CYP19A1基因多态性与晚期乳腺癌阿那曲唑治疗疗效相关性研究

[目的]研究CYP1 9A 1基因的rs4646和rs 10046位点多态性与晚期乳腺癌阿那曲唑治疗疗效的相关性.[方法]本研究共纳入272例激素受体阳性晚期乳腺癌患者,接受阿那曲唑治疗后抽取患者外周静脉血,提取DNA,多重PCR获取目的基因片段后,采用直接测序法分析CYP19A1基因多态性.对比等位基因分布频率在突变型和野生型两组患者中的差异.[结果]被检测的rs4646和rs 10046符合Hardy-Weinberg平衡检验;比较rs4646突变型和野生型两组阿那曲唑疗效,32例完全缓解的患者中24例是rs4646突变型,76例疾病进展者中有60例是rs4646野生型,P＜0.005,经过Bonferroni矫正P值仍有统计学意义.与rS4646野生型相比,携带rs4646突变型患者的中位生存期(median survival time,MST)显著延长(Log-rank检验P=0.007).携带rs4646突变型患者的疾病进展时间(time to progression,TTP)显著延长(Log-rank检验P=0.049).[结论]rs4646多态性位点可能会成为预测晚期乳腺癌阿那曲唑治疗疗效和预后的预测因子.     

A dual-center randomized controlled double blind trial assessing the effect of acupuncture in reducing musculoskeletal symptoms in breast cancer patients taking aromatase inhibitors

Estrogen synthesis suppression induced by aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer (BC) patients may be affected by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the gene encoding aromatase enzyme, CYP19A1. We assessed the association between plasma estrone sulfate (ES), letrozole treatment, and four SNPs of CYP19A1 gene (rs10046 C>T, rs4646 G>T, rs749292 C>T, rs727479 T>G) which seem to be related to circulating estrogen levels. Patients were enrolled into a prospective, Italian multi-center clinical trial (Gruppo Italiano Mammella, GIM-5) testing the association of CYP19A1 SNPs with the efficacy of letrozole adjuvant therapy, in postmenopausal early BC patients. SNPs were identified from peripheral blood cell DNA. Plasma ES concentrations were evaluated by Radio Immuno Assay. Blood samples were obtained immediately before letrozole therapy (N = 204), at 6-weeks (N = 178), 6 (N = 152) and 12-months (N = 136) during treatment. Medians (IQR) of ES were 160 pg/mL (85–274) at baseline, 35 pg/mL (12–64) at 6-weeks, 29 pg/mL (17–48) at 6 months and 25 pg/mL (8–46) after 12 months treatment. No statistically significant association was evident between polymorphisms and ES circulating levels during letrozole therapy. Letrozole suppression of the aromatase enzyme function is not affected by polymorphisms of CYP19A1 gene in postmenopausal BC patients.     

Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the aromatase gene (CYP19A1), HER2/neu status, and prognosis in breast cancer patients

Purpose Estrogen exposure is involved in both breast cancer susceptibility and the prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Aromatase is involved in the production of estrogens, and altered expression of it might be associated with the prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the aromatase gene, CYP19A1, on the prognosis, and in relation to tumor and patient characteristics in a cohort of breast cancer patients. Patients and methods The cohort analyzed in this study consisted of 1,257 patients with invasive primary breast cancer. Polymorphisms rs10046, rs4646 and rs700519 were genotyped within this group. Results The variant genotypes of rs10046 and rs4646 were associated with a lower percentage of HER2-positive tumors. There was no association of rs700519 and rs4646 with disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS). The variant genotype of rs10046 was significantly associated with a better 5-year DFS (hazards ratio 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.81; P = 0.004) adjusted for age, nodal status, tumor size grading, and hormone receptor status. This effect appeared to be determined in the subgroup of premenopausal patients. Conclusion SNPs rs10046 and rs4646 may influence the HER2 status of breast cancer tumors, and rs10046 genotypes are associated with an altered DFS. Genotypes of aromatase polymorphisms may influence the prognosis for breast cancer patients not only by affecting the extent of estrogen exposure but also through an alteration in tumor characteristics. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Elevated Aromatase (<Emphasis Type="Italic">CYP19A1</Emphasis>) Expression Is Associated with a Poor Survival of Patients with Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

Genetic variants in CYP19A1, the gene encoding aromatase, have been reported to be associated with circulating estrogen concentrations, a key risk factor for breast cancer. The mechanism underlying this association is still unclear; it has been suggested that some of these variants may alter the expression and/or activity of aromatase. Here we analyzed the expression of intra-tumoral CYP19A1 messenger RNA (mRNA) and the genotypes of rs10046, a well-characterized single nucleotide polymorphism in CYP19A1, in 138 breast cancer patients and 15 breast cancer cell lines. The genotype TT was detected in 36 patients and six cell lines, genotype CT in 55 patients and five cell lines, and genotype CC in 28 patients and four cell lines. We found no evidence for a significant association of CYP19A1 levels with rs10046 genotypes, although expression tended to be higher in tumors and cell lines with the homozygous risk genotype TT. We also found no evidence for a significant association of rs10046 genotypes with breast cancer prognosis. In contrast, high CYP19A1 expression was highly significantly associated with a poor overall, disease-free, and metastasis-free survival in estrogen receptor-positive but not negative breast cancer patients. Moreover, CYP19A1 mRNA was significantly elevated in postmenopausal patients and in patients older than 50 years, and a trend towards a positive correlation with ER status and ESR1 mRNA expression was observed. These findings highlight the key role of aromatase in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer biology.     

High circulating HER2 extracellular domain levels correlate with reduced efficacy of an aromatase inhibitor in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a confirmatory prospective study

BACKGROUND: In this specifically designed, prospective study, the authors addressed the predictive value of circulating levels of the extracellular domain (ECD) of HER2 in patients with metastatic breast cancer who were treated with letrozole. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-six patients with hormone receptor-positive, metastatic breast cancer received letrozole (2.5 mg daily) until they developed either disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy was measured primarily as the time to progression (TTP) and, secondarily, as the objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival. HER2 ECD levels were determined by using a sandwich enzyme HER2/neu immunoassay before letrozole treatment was initiated. Positive HER2 ECD status was correlated with treatment efficacy. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (19%) had elevated HER2 ECD levels, which were associated with primary tumor HER2 expression (P < .001) but not with age, performance status, location, or number of metastatic sites. The median TTP was significantly shorter among patients who had elevated HER2 ECD compared with the median TTP among patients who had normal levels (4 months vs 14 months; P = .0004), and the ORR was lower in the group with elevated HER2 ECD levels (14% vs 30%; P < .036). Overall survival was significantly shorter among patients with elevated serum HER-2 ECD (P < .0005). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated HER2 ECD concentrations predicted poorer outcomes in postmenopausal women with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who were treated with aromatase inhibitors like letrozole.     

Single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP19A1 predict clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with letrozole in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Purpose  

The CYP19A1 gene encodes the aromatase enzyme involved in the peripheral conversion of androgen to estrogen. We evaluated the efficacy of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as related to DNA polymorphisms of CYP19A1.     

Serum HER-2/neu and response to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole versus tamoxifen.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of elevated serum HER-2/neu on the response of metastatic breast cancer patients to an aromatase inhibitor versus an antiestrogen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-two estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients were randomized to first-line hormone therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen. An automated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect serum HER-2/neu. RESULTS: For patients with normal serum HER-2/neu (70.5%), objective response rate (ORR; 39% in letrozole-treated patients v 26% in tamoxifen-treated patients; P =.008), clinical benefit (CB; 57% v 45%; P =.016), time to progression (TTP; median, 12.2 v 8.5 months; P =.0019), and time to treatment failure (TTF; median, 11.6 v 6.2 months; P =.0066) were significantly better in patients treated with letrozole. In the elevated HER-2/neu group (29.5%), there was no significant difference in ORR (17% in letrozole-treated patients v 13% in tamoxifen-treated patients; P =.45) or CB (33% v 26%; P =.31), but there was a strong trend in favor of a longer TTP with letrozole (median, 6.1 v 3.3 months; P =.0596) and a significantly longer TTF with letrozole (median, 6.0 v 3.2 months; P =.0418). Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated serum HER-2/neu was a negative predictor for ORR and TTP. CONCLUSION: Patients with normal serum HER-2/neu receiving letrozole demonstrated a significantly greater ORR and CB and longer TTP and TTF than patients receiving tamoxifen. Although in patients with elevated serum HER-2/neu there was no significant difference between letrozole and tamoxifen in ORR or CB, there was a strong trend favoring longer TTP and significantly longer TTF with letrozole.     

A comparison of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Randomized clinical trials have established the role of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) as standard treatment for patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer who have experienced disease progression with antiestrogen therapy. Significant gains in clinical efficacy and improved tolerability over progestins (megestrol acetate) and the first-generation AI aminoglutethimide have positioned these agents above previous therapies. Estrogen receptor (ER) status remains the best predictive determinant of endocrine response, and further randomized trials with properly selected patient populations may distinguish individual AIs within this class. A recently completed, randomized, head-to-head phase III trial of letrozole versus anastrozole as second-line endocrine therapy demonstrated a significant difference in objective response rate for letrozole compared with anastrozole (19% versus 12%, respectively; P = 0.014), with similar time to progression. The improved efficacy and safety of AIs as second-line endocrine therapies has spawned trials of their use as first-line endocrine therapy versus tamoxifen for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Based on favorable results from these trials, letrozole and anastrozole have also been approved for use as first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.     

Polymorphisms of CYP19A1 and response to aromatase inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer patients

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene encoding aromatase (CYP19A1) have been associated with differential benefit from letrozole treatment in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients, but validation is lacking. The aim was to investigate whether polymorphic variation of CYP19A1 and enzymes involved in estrogen and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) metabolism are associated with efficacy of AIs. 308 Women with estrogen-receptor-positive metastatic mBC treated with a third-generation AI were identified retrospectively. DNA was extracted from archival formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumors and genotyped for 71 variants in 16 candidate genes, including CYP19A1. Time to treatment failure (TTF) was significantly improved in patients carrying the minor (T) allele of rs4775936 when compared to patients with the reference allele [HR = 0.79 per T allele (0.66-0.95); P = 0.012]. Patients with >7 TTTA repeats on either allele of CYP19A1 intron 4 had a lower risk of failure than those with a smaller repeat size [HR = 0.84 per >7 TTTA repeats (0.7-0.99); P = 0.04]. However, importantly in multivariate analysis, adjusting for the number of disease sites; disease-free interval from diagnosis to first recurrence, grade at diagnosis and first recurrence type neither variant maintained independent predictive significance. None of the 56 SNPs analyzed as an exploratory set showed significant association with TTF. Variants in CYP19A1 or other selected genes associated with AI metabolism were not independently associated with improved AI efficacy and emphasize the importance in pharmacogenetic studies of considering genetic biomarkers in the context of relevant prognostic factors.     

Letrozole for the management of breast cancer

Letrozole, a third-generation aromatase inhibitor, has been the only aromatase inhibitor to date to show unequivocal superiority to tamoxifen as first-line treatment of metastatic postmenopausal breast cancer. The superiority of letrozole compared with tamoxifen was also reflected in the neoadjuvant setting, in both estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-unknown patients with differing HER-2 status. Currently, studies are being performed in the adjuvant setting, which will provide important data on the long-term safety of letrozole and help determine its suitability as a chemopreventive agent in healthy women at risk of developing breast cancer. Nevertheless, the superior clinical efficacy and survival data of letrozole suggest that it has the potential to displace tamoxifen as the gold standard in breast cancer treatment in the coming years.     

Letrozole for the management of breast cancer

Letrozole, a third-generation aromatase inhibitor, has been the only aromatase inhibitor to date to show unequivocal superiority to tamoxifen as first-line treatment of metastatic postmenopausal breast cancer. The superiority of letrozole compared with tamoxifen was also reflected in the neoadjuvant setting, in both estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-unknown patients with differing HER-2 status. Currently, studies are being performed in the adjuvant setting, which will provide important data on the long-term safety of letrozole and help determine its suitability as a chemopreventive agent in healthy women at risk of developing breast cancer. Nevertheless, the superior clinical efficacy and survival data of letrozole suggest that it has the potential to displace tamoxifen as the gold standard in breast cancer treatment in the coming years.     

Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tamoxifen with that of letrozole, an oral aromatase inhibitor, with tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred seven patients were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (453 patients) or tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (454 patients). Patients had estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors, or both receptors were unknown. Recurrence during adjuvant antiestrogen therapy or within the following 12 months or prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease precluded enrollment. One prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease was allowed. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included overall objective response rate (ORR), its duration, rate and duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and tolerability. RESULTS: TTP was significantly longer for letrozole than for tamoxifen (median, 41 v 26 weeks). Treatment with letrozole reduced the risk of progression by 30% (hazards ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.82, P =.0001). TTP was significantly longer for letrozole irrespective of dominant site of disease, receptor status, or prior adjuvant antiestrogen therapy. Similarly, TTF was significantly longer for letrozole (median, 40 v 25 weeks). ORR was higher for letrozole (30% v 20%; P =.0006), as was the rate of clinical benefit (49% v 38%; P =.001). Survival data are currently immature and not reported here. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Letrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in TTP, TTF, ORR, and clinical benefit rate. Our results support its use as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.     

Additive antitumor effect of aromatase inhibitor letrozole and antiestrogen fulvestrant in a postmenopausal breast cancer model

Blocking estrogen receptors with antiestrogens and blocking estrogen synthesis with aromatase inhibitors are two strategies currently being used for reducing the effect of estrogen in postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. To optimize these treatment strategies, we have investigated whether tumor progression can be delayed by combining the pure antiestrogen fulvestrant with the nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor letrozole. These studies were done in ovariectomized, athymic mice bearing tumors of estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cells stably transfected with the aromatase gene (MCF-7Ca). Groups of mice with equivalent tumor volumes were injected s.c. daily with vehicle (control; n = 6), fulvestrant (1 mg/d; n = 7), letrozole (10 microg/d; n = 18), or letrozole (10 microg/d) plus fulvestrant (1 mg/d; n = 5). All treatments were effective in suppressing tumor growth compared with controls (P < 0.001). Tumor volumes of the fulvestrant-treated group had doubled in 10 weeks. After 19 weeks of letrozole (10 microg/d) treatment when tumors had nearly doubled in volume, mice (n = 18) were assigned to second-line therapy with letrozole (100 microg/d; n = 6), tamoxifen (100 microg/d; n = 6), or remained on letrozole treatment (10 microg/d; n = 6). However, tumors continued to increase in volume in these groups. Tumors of animals treated with the combination of letrozole plus Faslodex regressed over 29 weeks of treatment by 45%. Thus, the combination of letrozole plus fulvestrant was more effective in suppressing tumor growth than either letrozole or fulvestrant alone or sequential therapies with tamoxifen or a higher dose of letrozole (100 microg/d).     

Sequential treatment with exemestane and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The steroidal aromatase inactivator exemestane has demonstrated activity after prior failure of non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (including third-generation inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. If exemestane is used as first anti-aromatase agent, however, it is unclear whether patients can still benefit from letrozole or anastrozole after progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive or -unknown breast cancer were eligible for this study. Patients with no prior exposure to anti-aromatase drugs received exemestane, 25 mg daily, as first anti-aromatase agent. At the time of progression, patients were crossed-over to anastrozole or letrozole if further endocrine therapy was considered appropriate. Patients with prior exposure to anti-aromatase agents were also included in the study, and were given anastrozole or letrozole if they had previously received exemestane, or exemestane if they had previously received anastrozole or letrozole. The primary endpoint of the study was the clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stabilization of disease for >or=24 weeks). RESULTS: Forty patients received exemestane 25 mg daily as first anti-aromatase agent, with a CB rate of 67.5% (95% CI 52.9-82.0%) and a median time to progression (TTP) of 9.6 months. In 18 patients, letrozole (n = 17) or anastrozole (n = 1) were used after failure of exemestane: the CB rate was 55.6% (95% CI 32.6-78.5%) with a median TTP of 9.3 months. In 23 patients, exemestane was used after failure of letrozole or anastrozole: the CB rate was 43.5% (95% CI 23.2-63.7%) with a median TTP of 5.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that exemestane is active after prior failure of letrozole or anastrozole. We have also shown that patients can receive exemestane as their first anti-aromatase agent and still benefit from letrozole or anastrozole after progression. This suggests that the partial non-cross resistance between steroidal and non-steroidal anti-aromatase agents is independent of the sequence employed.     

Human aromatase: gene resequencing and functional genomics

Aromatase [cytochrome P450 19 (CYP19)] is a critical enzyme for estrogen biosynthesis, and aromatase inhibitors are of increasing importance in the treatment of breast cancer. We set out to identify and characterize genetic polymorphisms in the aromatase gene, CYP19, as a step toward pharmacogenomic studies of aromatase inhibitors. Specifically, we "resequenced" all coding exons, all upstream untranslated exons plus their presumed core promoter regions, all exon-intron splice junctions, and a portion of the 3'-untranslated region of CYP19 using 240 DNA samples from four ethnic groups. Eighty-eight polymorphisms were identified, resulting in 44 haplotypes. Functional genomic studies were done with the four nonsynonymous coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (cSNP) that we observed, two of which were novel. Those cSNPs altered the following amino acids: Trp39Arg, Thr201Met, Arg264Cys, and Met364Thr. The Cys264, Thr364, and double variant Arg39Cys264 allozymes showed significant decreases in levels of activity and immunoreactive protein when compared with the wild-type (WT) enzyme after transient expression in COS-1 cells. A slight decrease in protein level was also observed for the Arg39 allozyme, whereas Met201 displayed no significant changes in either activity or protein level when compared with the WT enzyme. There was also a 4-fold increase in apparent K(m) value for Thr364 with androstenedione as substrate. Of the recombinant allozymes, only the double mutant (Arg39Cys264) displayed a significant change from the WT enzyme in inhibitor constant for the aromatase inhibitors exemestane and letrozole. These observations indicate that genetic variation in CYP19 might contribute to variation in the pathophysiology of estrogen-dependent disease.     

Genetic variation at the CYP19A1 locus predicts circulating estrogen levels but not breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women

The CYP19A1 gene encodes the enzyme aromatase, which is responsible for the final step in the biosynthesis of estrogens. In this study, we used a systematic two-step approach that included gene resequencing and a haplotype-based analysis to comprehensively survey common genetic variation across the CYP19A1 locus in relation to circulating postmenopausal steroid hormone levels and breast cancer risk. This study was conducted among 5,356 invasive breast cancer cases and 7,129 controls comprised primarily of White women of European descent drawn from five large prospective cohorts within the National Cancer Institute Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium. A high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) map of 103 common SNPs (> or =5% frequency) was used to identify the linkage disequilibrium and haplotype patterns across the CYP19A1 locus, and 19 haplotype-tagging SNPs were selected to provide high predictability of the common haplotype patterns. We found haplotype-tagging SNPs and common haplotypes spanning the coding and proximal 5' region of CYP19A1 to be significantly associated with a 10% to 20% increase in endogenous estrogen levels in postmenopausal women [effect per copy of the two-SNP haplotype rs749292-rs727479 (A-A) versus noncarriers; P = 4.4 x 10(-15)]. No significant associations were observed, however, with these SNPs or common haplotypes and breast cancer risk. Thus, although genetic variation in CYP19A1 produces measurable differences in estrogen levels among postmenopausal women, the magnitude of the change was insufficient to contribute detectably to breast cancer.     

Elevated serum Her-2/neu level predicts decreased response to hormone therapy in metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of elevation of serum HER-2/neu on response to hormone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seven hundred nineteen metastatic patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)), progesterone receptor-positive, or both or ER status unknown breast cancer were randomized in three independent clinical trials to receive second-line hormone therapy with either megestrol acetate or an aromatase inhibitor (fadrozole or letrozole). An automated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay specific for the extracellular domain of the HER-2/neu (c-erbB-2) oncoprotein product was used to detect serum levels. RESULTS: Two hundred nineteen patients (30%) had elevated serum HER-2/neu protein levels, using the mean + 2 SD (15 ng/mL) from the serum of healthy women as an upper limit. Response to treatment was available for 711 patients. The response rate (complete responses plus partial responses plus stable disease) to endocrine therapy was 45% in 494 patients with non-elevated and 23% in 217 patients with elevated serum HER-2/neu levels (P <.0001). Median duration of treatment response (using the time to progression [TTP] variable for patients who responded) was shorter in the group with elevated serum HER-2/neu levels (11.7 months) compared with the patient group with non-elevated levels (17.4 months). TTP, time to treatment failure, and median survival (17.2 months v 29.6 months) were also significantly shorter in the patients with elevated serum HER-2/neu levels (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients with ER(+) and serum HER-2/neu-positive metastatic breast cancer are less likely to respond to hormone treatment and have a shorter duration of response than ER(+) and serum HER-2/neu-negative patients. Their survival duration is also shorter.     

Effects of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole on normal breast epithelial cell proliferation and metabolic indices in postmenopausal women: a pilot study for breast cancer prevention.

The aromatase enzyme converts androgens to estrogens and is the therapeutic target for aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Third-generation inhibitors such as letrozole are being considered as potential prophylactic agents for breast cancer. The rationale for their preventive application would be aided by knowledge of their effects on the normal breast and on other estrogen-dependent processes such as bone and lipid metabolism. Thirty-two women without active breast disease were recruited to 3-month treatment with letrozole (2.5 mg/day). Core-cut biopsies from the breast and blood samples were collected before and at the end of treatment. Plasma estradiol levels were markedly suppressed in all but two patients, who were excluded from the efficacy assessment. There was no significant change in the proliferation marker Ki67 (mean change, -23%; 95% confidence interval, -50% to +23%) or estrogen receptor in breast epithelial cells with treatment. Similarly, there were no significant changes in plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor I or lipid profiles. However, there was a significant increase (25%) in the levels of the bone resorption marker C-telopeptide crosslinks (CTx). We conclude that any prophylactic effect of letrozole is not likely to be dependent on antiproliferative effects on normal breast. Studies in healthy patients will need to recognize the potential for enhanced bone resorption.     

Genetic variation in the androgen estrogen conversion pathway in relation to breast cancer prognosticators

Genetic variation in the androgen-to-estrogen conversion pathway has been shown to be associated with risk of breast cancer and, in particular, with estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumours. We aimed at studying how the genetic alterations, which have been identified for risk, are associated with breast cancer prognosticators, with a prior hypothesis that, in general, hormone-related breast cancers have a better prognosis than non-hormone-related breast cancers. Association between tagging SNPs in genes involved in estrogen metabolism and patient’s lymph node status, tumour size and histological grade were estimated in a sample of 1569 Swedish breast cancer patients. Polymorphisms in CYP19A1, which have previously been linked to breast cancer risk, are shown to be associated with breast cancer prognosticators. The strongest association was observed for rs4646, with histological grade. The common allele of rs4646, which has been associated with increased breast cancer risk, was associated with low-histological grade and small tumour size (P = 0.001 and 0.015; 1-sided, respectively). We also found evidence that SNP rs7167936 is associated with histological grade and tumour size (P = 0.010 and 0.005; 1-sided, respectively). We show that rs4646 and rs7167936 are associated with histological grade even amongst only ER-positive tumours (P = 0.008 and 0.011; 1-sided, respectively). Our results provide new evidence that CYP19A1 is involved in both breast cancer risk and prognosis.     

Emerging role of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have been approved as second-line treatment for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer after first-line treatment with the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) tamoxifen. Anastrozole and letrozole have also recently been widely approved as first-line endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. The three third-generation selective oral AIs approved for use in the United States include two nonsteroidal agents, anastrozole (Arimidex) and letrozole (Femara), and the irreversible steroidal inhibitor exemestane (Aromasin). Several major ongoing clinical trials with a variety of treatment regimens are comparing the relative efficacy of tamoxifen with the steroidal and nonsteroidal AIs in the adjuvant setting. The first strategy compares an AI against tamoxifen directly. Among these are the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) trial (anastrozole), the BIG FEMTA (Femara-Tamoxifen Breast International Group) trial (letrozole), and the EXEM and TEAM (exemestane) trials. A second strategy is examining the use of an AI as an extension after the initial 5 years of tamoxifen. Examples of this trial design are the MA-17 (letrozole) and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP B-33, exemestane) trials. A third approach is the use of these agents in sequence with tamoxifen as therapy within the initial 5 postoperative years. Examples of this approach are the International Collaboration Cancer Group trial (tamoxifen for 2-3 years followed by either tamoxifen or exemestane for the remainder of the 5-year period), the BIG FEMTA trial (patients are crossed over from tamoxifen to Ietrozole or letrozole to tamoxifen), and the Arimidex-Nolvadex (ARNO) trial (patients receiving tamoxifen are randomized either to continue with tamoxifen or to switch to anastrozole). A single trial is comparing tamoxifen and anastrozole as initial 5-year therapy, or a combination of the two. The study addressing this design is the ATAC trial. Finally, a small trial in Norway is comparing 2 years of an AI versus a placebo in very low-risk patients with receptor-positive breast tumors. Most adjuvant trials have companion studies associated with the main protocol. These are to determine the end-organ effects of the inhibitors and include measurements of quality of life, bone and lipid metabolism, and endometrial effects. This review addresses the clinical implications of these studies of AIs.