Tissue tracking allows rapid and accurate visual evaluation of left ventricular function.

AIMS: To evaluate the ability of tissue tracking for rapid assessment of left ventricular function by determination of the systolic mitral annular displacement. Tissue tracking is a new echocardiographic modality based on Doppler Tissue imaging allowing rapid visual assessment of the systolic baso-apical displacement of each myocardial segment in apical views by a graded colour display. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 90 patients (69 male, age 60.4 +/- 10.1 years) with different left ventricular function (25 subjects with normal left ventricular function, 25 patients with homogeneous depression of left ventricular function and 40 patients with prior myocardial infarction). Systolic mitral annular displacement was determined by tissue tracking and M-mode echocardiography. Apical two-, three- and four-chamber views were used to determine the mitral annular displacement of six sites. Left ventricular ejection fraction was determined by two-dimensional echocardiography using Simpson's rule. Tissue tracking was possible in all patients. In the 50 patients with normal left ventricular function or homogeneous depression of left ventricular function, mean mitral annular displacement correlated closely with mitral annular displacement determined by M-mode (r=0.99,P <0.001) and with left ventricular ejection fraction (r=0.97, P<0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 30% could be predicted with a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 78% using a cut-off value of 4.8mm for the mitral annular displacement determined by tissue tracking. In patients with prior myocardial infarction correlation between the mean mitral annular displacement and left ventricular ejection fraction was lower (r=0.87, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Systolic mitral annular displacement determined by tissue tracking correlates closely with mitral annular displacement determined by M-mode and with left ventricular ejection fraction. Thus, tissue tracking allows rapid semiquantitative evaluation of global left ventricular function by assessment of systolic mitral annular displacement.     

Quantitative three dimensional echocardiography in patients with pulmonary hypertension and compressed left ventricles: comparison with cross sectional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of quantitative three dimensional echocardiography in patients with deformed left ventricles. DESIGN: Three dimensional and cross sectional echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction were prospectively compared to those obtained from magnetic resonance imaging. SETTING: Echocardiography laboratory of a university hospital. PATIENTS: 26 patients (9 months to 42 years, median age 11 years) with pulmonary hypertension and fixed reversal of normal interventricular septal curvature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic volumes and ejection fraction. RESULTS: Three dimensional echocardiographic comparison to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) yielded r values of 0.94 and 0.87 with a bias of -6.9 (SD 6.9) ml and -16 (11.2) ml for systolic and diastolic volumes respectively. Inter-observer variability was minimal (8.3% and 7.6% respectively). Cross sectional echocardiography gave correlation coefficients of 0.62 and 0.80 and bias of 3.1 (14.1) ml and 16.3 (18.3) ml for systolic and diastolic volumes respectively. Ejection fraction by three dimensional echocardiography also had closer agreement with MRI (bias = 1.1 (7.7)%) than cross sectional echocardiography (bias = 4.4 (13.9)%). CONCLUSIONS: Three dimensional echocardiography provides reliable estimates of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction, comparable to magnetic resonance imaging in pulmonary hypertension patients with compressed ventricular geometry. Because it eliminates the need for geometric assumptions it shows closer agreement with magnetic resonance imaging in that setting than cross sectional echocardiography.     

Prevalence and clinical significance of left atrial thrombus in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation

The prevalence and clinical significance of left atrial thrombus were prospectively investigated in a consecutive series of 219 patients with chronic nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation using transesophageal echocardiography. Fifteen left atrial thrombi were detected in 15 of the 219 patients (6.8%); 12 of these thrombi (80%) were confined to the left atrial appendage. Left atrial spontaneous echo contrast was visualized in 85 patients (39%). All the thrombi were found in the left atria with spontaneous echo contrast. Patients with left atrial thrombus had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction than those without (49±14% vs. 59±14%; P<0.05). Multivariate analysis among clinical and transthoracic echocardiographic variables showed that left ventricular ejection fraction <50% was the only independent predictor for the presence of left atrial thrombus. A history of thromboembolism was significantly more frequent in patients with left atrial thrombus than in those without (73% vs. 32%; P<0.005). The presence of left atrial thrombus was more specific than spontaneous echo contrast for predicting history of thromboembolism (97% vs. 80%), but its sensitivity was significantly lower (14% vs. 73%). We conclude that: (1) Transesophageal echo-detected left atrial thrombus is not uncommon in patients with chronic nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and is exclusively observed in those with left atrial spontaneous echo contrast. (2) Impaired left ventricular systolic function may predispose the left atrial thrombus formation. (3) Left atrial thrombus is a highly specific but insensitive predictor for thromboembolic events.     

New insight into left ventricular function in tricuspid atresia after total cavopulmonary connection: a three-dimensional echocardiographic study

BACKGROUND: In patients with tricuspid atresia palliated by construction of a total cavopulmonary connection, both pulmonary and systemic circulations depend on the performance of the dominant left ventricle. When estimating the volume of such ventricles using cross-sectional echocardiography, it is necessary to make assumptions concerning the geometry of the ventricular shape. This is avoided by three-dimensional echocardiography, which provides direct volumetric data. Our purpose was to apply this new method to quantify left ventricular volumes and function in patients with tricuspid atresia after construction of a total cavopulmonary connection. METHODS: We studied ten patients (median age: 8 years) with tricuspid atresia who had undergone a total cavopulmonary connection, comparing them with 10 normal children matched for age, sex and size. The three-dimensional echocardiography was performed with electrocardiographic and respiratory gating. A new transthoracic integrated probe designed for small children was used with a rotational scanning increment of 3 degrees. The 60 slices obtained from the ventricular cavity were stored and formatted in a commercial system (TomTec). End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, stroke volume and ejection fraction were calculated after manual tracing of the endocardial surfaces. The volumes were indexed to the body surface area. RESULTS: As seen in the reconstructions, the dominant left ventricle in tricuspid atresia had a spherical shape, whereas the normal left ventricle is oblong. The left ventricular volumes and function in tricuspid atresia were 54+/-4 ml/m2 (end-diastolic volume), 28+/-3 ml/m2 (end-systolic volume), 26+/-7 ml/m2 (stroke volume) and 48+/-6% (ejection fraction). These volumes were not different from those obtained in the controls (p = NS). The left ventricular stroke volume and ejection fraction in 10 patients with tricuspid atresia were lower than those calculated for the controls (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional echocardiography provides a quantitative insight into the pathophysiologic function of the dominant left ventricle in tricuspid atresia after construction of a total cavopulmonary connection.     

Measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction after intravenous contrast agent administration using standard echocardiographic equipment

The enhancement of endocardial border delineation using second harmonic imaging and contrast administration improves the measurement of ventricular volumes. In the majority of existing echocardiographic equipment, however, harmonic imaging is not yet available. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of the measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction after intravenous administration of the contrast agent Levovist using standard echocardiographic equipment and fundamental imaging modality. In 10 patients with good-quality two-dimensional echo imaging, 4 g (400 mg/mL concentration) of Levovist was injected intravenously. Hewlett-Packard Sonos 2000 ultrasound equipment without second harmonic imaging capability was used. To avoid the destruction of microbubbles, the echo machine was set to produce only one end-systolic and one end-diastolic frame in each cardiac cycle (dual triggering). Native and contrast imaging measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions calculated by modified Simpson's rule were compared in the fundamental mode. Intraobserver and interobserver variability values were assessed. End-diastolic volumes in native continuous and triggered mode and by contrast echo were 126 +/- 48, 121 +/- 46, and 130 +/- 50 mL, respectively (NS), whereas end-systolic volumes were 79 +/- 48, 76 +/- 45, and 79 +/- 46 mL, respectively (NS). Calculated ejection fraction using the three different imaging modalities were 0.41 +/- 0.16, 0.41 +/- 0.16, and 0.42 +/- 0.16 (NS). The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility values were excellent in triggered mode. Standard echocardiographic equipment with fundamental imaging modality in the triggered mode is suitable for the measurement of left ventricular volumes after intravenous Levovist administration. In clinically difficult patients, contrast echocardiography in triggered mode may be applied even if echocardiographic equipment does not have harmonic imaging possibility.     

Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?

AIMS: To prospectively compare the agreement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by M-mode echocardiography (echo), 2D echo, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance performed in patients with chronic stable heart failure. It is important to know whether the results of each technique are interchangable, and thereby how the results of large studies in heart failure utilizing one technique can be applied using another. Some studies have compared cardiovascular magnetic resonance with echo or radionuclude ventriculography but few contain patients with heart failure and none have compared these techniques with the current fast breath-hold acquisition cardiovascular magnetic resonance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty two patients with chronic stable heart failure taking part in the CHRISTMAS Study, underwent M-mode echo, 2D echo, radionuclude ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance within 4 weeks. The scans were analysed independently in blinded fashion by a single investigator at three core laboratories. Of the echocardiograms, 86% had sufficient image quality to obtain left ventricular ejection fraction by M-mode method, but only 69% by 2D Simpson's biplane analysis. All 52 patients tolerated the radionuclude ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and all these scans were analysable. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction by M-mode cube method was 39+/-16% and 29+/-15% by Teichholz M-mode method. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction by 2D echo Simpson's biplane was 31+/-10%, by radionuclude ventriculography was 24+/-9% and by cardiovascular magnetic resonance was 30+/-11. All the mean left ventricular ejection fractions by each technique were significantly different from all other techniques (P<0.001), except for cardiovascular magnetic resonance ejection fraction and 2D echo ejection fraction by Simpson's rule (P=0.23). The Bland-Altman limits of agreement encompassing four standard deviations was widest for both cardiovascular magnetic resonance vs cube M-mode echo and cardiovascular magnetic resonance vs Teichholz M-mode echo at 66% each, and was 58% for radionuclude ventriculography vs cube M-mode echo, 44% for cardiovascular magnetic resonance vs Simpson's 2D echo, 39% for radionuclide ventriculography vs Simpson's 2D echo, and smallest at 31% for cardiovascular magnetic resonance-radionuclide ventriculography. Similarly, the end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume by 2D echo and cardiovascular magnetic resonance revealed wide limits of agreement (52 ml to 216 ml and 11 ml to 188 ml, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ejection fraction measurements by various techniques are not interchangeable. The conclusions and recommendations of research studies in heart failure should therefore be interpreted in the context of locally available techniques. In addition, there are very wide variances in volumes and ejection fraction between techniques, which are most marked in comparisons using echocardiography. This suggests that cardiovascular magnetic resonance is the preferred technique for volume and ejection fraction estimation in heart failure patients, because of its 3D approach for non-symmetric ventricles and superior image quality.     

Reproducibility of left ventricular size, shape and mass with echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide angiography in patients with anterior wall infarction

After myocardial infarction, left ventricular volume and ejection fraction can be assessed by echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide angiography to guide therapy and determine prognosis. Whether a measured parameter gives the same results irrespective of the method used and the observer who performs the analysis is only partly known. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability were determined for echo and magnetic resonance imaging. Left ventricular ejection fraction measured by these techniques was related to radionuclide angiograms performed in the same period. Intra-observer variability for both echo and MRI was low and in most instances below 5%. Inter-observer variability for the echo and MRI measurements were substantially higher than intra-observer variability. Comparison of the three imaging modalities revealed systematic differences. Therefore, in clinical studies, left ventricular volume and function parameters have to be measured with the same technique and by the same observer in qualified core laboratories.     

Comparison of four echocardiographic techniques for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction

Accurate quantitative measurement of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) by 2-dimensional echocardiography is limited by subjective visual endocardial border detection. Both harmonic and precision contrast microbubbles provide better delineation of endocardial borders than fundamental imaging. The aim of this study was to correlate 2-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of LVEF measured by 4 currently available techniques with radionuclide angiography. A total of 50 patients who underwent radionuclide (EF) measurement (47 of 50 had technically difficult echocardiograms by fundamental imaging) underwent echocardiography by 4 methods: fundamental alone, fundamental with contrast, harmonic alone, and harmonic with contrast. Three echocardiologists measured the biplane 2-dimensional echocardiographic LVEF independently and were blinded to radionuclide angiography. The correlation of echocardiographic EF with radionuclide EF improved incrementally with each method. However, contrast with harmonic imaging provided the closest correlation (r = 0.95, 0.96, and 0.95 as assessed by the 3 independent analysts.     

Echocardiographic online quantification of left ventricular systolic function in children: comparison with conventional off-line determination

Accurate and efficient echocardiographic on-line determination of left ventricular volume would be advantageous in the care of children with congenital heart disease and children with hemodynamic instability. The prospective study was performed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the on-line automatic border detection system (acoustic quantification: AQ) for determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in comparison to the conventional off-line method (manual tracing). 107 patients were enrolled in the study. The ages ranged from 0.1 to 18.8 years (mean 8.3 +/- 5.6). All patients were studied in the apical four-chamber plane for acoustic quantification (AQ) and manual tracing as well. Left ventricular volumes were determined using the mono-plane Simpson's rule. Left ventricular end-diastolic volumes obtained by AQ correlated well but were slightly underestimated compared to those determined by manual tracing (r = 0.99). Left ventricular endsystolic volumes by AQ correlated well but were also slightly underestimated compared to those obtained by manual tracing (r = 0.98). Mean ejection fraction was 61.1 +/- 6.8% by AQ compared with 61.5 +/- 5.9% by manual tracing. Linear regression analysis demonstrated good correlation: y = 0.77x + 14.1, r = 0.89; p < 0.001. Measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by AQ using automatic border detection compares well with measurements done by manual tracing. However, AQ tends to underestimate to some degree. The time necessary for acquisition of data was similar in both methods. AQ seems to be a promising method for real-time estimation of left ventricular volume, even in children.     

Improved reliability for echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular volume using harmonic power imaging mode combined with contrast agent

Harmonic power imaging (HPI) is a new echocardiographic modality that enhances the detection of contrast agents in the left ventricle. The endocardium can be delineated by conventional echocardiography using ultrasound contrast agents, although the images tend to be faint. The present study was designed to assess left ventricular volume using HPI after intravenous injection of the contrast agent Levovist (Schering SA, Berlin, Germany) in 25 unselected patients. End-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and ejection fraction were determined for each patient with angiography and with 4 different ultrasound modalities: (1) conventional mode without contrast, (2) contrast conventional mode, (3) contrast harmonic intermittent imaging mode, and (4) contrast triggered HPI. The use of HPI improved correlations between the echographic and angiographic measurements for all parameters as well as precision and bias determined by Bland and Altman analysis. The relative errors for interobserver variability were also lower with HPI. This study demonstrates that echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction is more accurate and reproducible using HPI combined with Levovist.     

Velocity vector imaging to quantify ventricular dyssynchrony and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Velocity vector imaging is a novel quantitative echocardiographic technique that was applied to routine grayscale echocardiographic images of 23 patients with heart failure who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy. The hypothesis was tested that velocity vector imaging can quantify left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and predict response to resynchronization therapy. Tissue velocities were determined by the automated tracking of periodic B-mode image patterns on digital cine loops from standard apical 4-chamber, 2-chamber, and long-axis views, with the user tracing the mid left ventricular wall from a single frame. Dyssynchrony was determined as the greatest opposing wall peak longitudinal systolic velocity delay from the 3 views. Responders, defined as those with >or=15% increases in the ejection fraction, had greater baseline dyssynchrony than nonresponders (opposing wall velocity delays of 131 +/- 83 vs 52 +/- 60 ms, p <0.05), and >or=75 ms predicted response with 85% sensitivity and 80% specificity when followed 8 +/- 5 months after resynchronization therapy. Baseline electrocardiographic QRS duration was not predictive in the same patients. In conclusion, echocardiographic velocity vector imaging has potential for clinical utility.     

Assessment of early changes in the segmental functions of the left and the right ventricles after biventricular pacing in heart failure: a study with tissue Doppler imaging

Tissue Doppler imaging allows assessment of systolic and diastolic regional ventricular function. The aim of this study was to assess early changes in regional systolic and diastolic functions and differences in transition time to contraction between the ventricles after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Fourteen patients were included, who underwent echocardiography before and 1 month after resynchronization. The difference between transition time to contraction of left and right ventricles decreased to 24.4 +/- 10.7 milliseconds from 65.3 +/- 18.2 milliseconds after resynchronization therapy (P = .001). There was a significant relation between the decrease in difference between transition time and increase in ejection fraction (r = 0.80, P = .002). Early or late diastolic myocardial motion increased in 7 segments of left and 2 segments of right ventricles. Systolic myocardial motion increased in 7 segments of left and in all segments of right ventricles. Resynchronization therapy improved systolic and diastolic functions in both ventricles. The difference between transition time to contraction of ventricles might be helpful in estimating optimal resynchronization.     

Comparison of contrast agent-enhanced versus non-contrast agent-enhanced real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for analysis of left ventricular systolic function

Ultrasound contrast has shown to improve endocardial border definition. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of contrast agent-enhanced versus non-contrast agent-enhanced real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction. Thirty-nine unselected patients underwent RT3DE with and without SonoVue contrast agent enhancement and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the same day. An image quality index was calculated by grading all 16 individual LV segments on a scale of 0 to 4: 0, not visible; 1, poor; 2, moderate; 3, good; and 4, excellent. The 3-dimensional data sets were analyzed offline using dedicated TomTec analysis software. By manual tracing, LV end-systolic volume, LV end-diastolic volume, and LV ejection fraction were calculated. After contrast agent enhancement, mean image quality index improved from 2.4 +/- 1.0 to 3.0 +/- 0.9 (p <0.001). Contrast agent-enhanced RT3DE measurements showed better correlation with MRI (LV end-diastolic volume, r = 0.97 vs 0.86; LV end-systolic volume, r = 0.96 vs 0.94; LV ejection fraction, r = 0.94 vs 0.81). The limits of agreement (Bland-Altman analysis) showed a similar bias for RT3DE images with and without contrast agent but with smaller limits of agreement for contrast agent-enhanced RT3DE. Also, inter- and intraobserver variabilities decreased. In a subgroup, patients with poor to moderate image quality showed an improvement in agreement after administration of contrast agent (+/-24.4% to +/-12.7%) to the same level as patients with moderate to good image quality without contrast agent (+/-10.4%). In conclusion, contrast agent-enhanced RT3DE is more accurate in assessment of LV function as evidenced by better correlation and narrower limits of agreement compared with MRI, as well as lower intra- and interobserver variabilities.     

Comparison between Transthoracic Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Status Post Atrial Switch Procedure

Objectives. This study compares image quality, cost, right ventricular ejection fraction analysis, and baffle visualization between transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in those status post atrial switch for transposition of the great arteries. Background. This population requires imaging for serial evaluations. Transthoracic echocardiography is often first line but has drawbacks, many of which are addressed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Methods. Twelve patients (mean age 25 years) with relatively concurrent (mean 157 days) studies were included. Three separate echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging physicians independently analyzed baffles, image quality, and right ventricular ejection fractions. Institutional and Medicaid charges were compared. Results. For right ventricular ejection fraction, echocardiography (36.1%) underestimated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (47.8%, P= .002). Image quality for transthoracic echocardiography was significantly rated lower than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (P= .002). Baffles were better seen in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (transthoracic echocardiography vs. cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: superior vena cava 86% vs. 100% [P= .063]; inferior vena cava 33% vs. 97% [P= .002]; pulmonary vein 92% vs. 100% [P= .250]). Comparing hospital charges and Medicaid reimbursement, transthoracic echocardiography respectively costs 18% and 38% less than cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions. In conclusion, transthoracic echocardiography underestimated right ventricular ejection fraction compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging had consistently higher image quality and better visualization of the baffles. Cost differences are minimal. We propose that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging be considered first line for imaging in certain patients' status post atrial switch procedure.     

Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by mechanical cross-sectional echocardiography.

Cross-sectional echocardiography is a new noninvasive technique for imaging the heart. We developed a method for using mechanical cross-sectional echocardiograms (sector scans) to determine left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Using left ventricular cineangiography as a standard, sector scan ejection fraction correlated better (r = 0.93) than M-mode echocardiography by any of three established methods, and the sector scan regression line did not differ from the line of identity (p greater than 0.33). Interobserver variability for sector scan ejection fraction was 2.3 +/- 1.2% (mean +/- SD). Variation between two studies performed within 24 hours and analyzed by the same observer was 1.4 +/- 1.5%. However, the sector scans consistently underestimated left ventricular end-diastolic volume. We conclude that sector scan echocardiography is more reliable than conventional M-mode technique for estimating left ventricular ejection fraction, but estimation of left ventricular end-diastolic volume is unreliable with the methods currently available.     

Usefulness of digital angiography in the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction

With modern digital cardiac systems the image data are digitized on-line and in real-time, allowing the replay and subsequent interpretation and analysis during or directly after the cardiac catheterization procedure. In this study we have evaluated the advantages and limitations of a manual tracing technique for left ventricular digital angiograms on the Phillips DCI system. Thirty-three patients who were catheterized for suspected coronary artery disease were studied. The manual tracings were performed by a senior cardiologist and an experienced function-analyst. It was found that the short- and long-term intraobserver variabilities in the assessment of the global ejection fraction were very small; short-term mean difference +/- standard deviation (correlation coefficient): 0.5 +/- 2.7 (r = 0.97) global EF%-units; long term; 0.7 +/- 2.7 (r = 0.96) EF%-units. The interobserver variabilities (5.1 +/- 4.8 (r = 0.93) EF%-units) were slightly higher than the intraobserver variabilities. A decrease by 25% in the amount of contrast medium administered did not significantly influence the variabilities in the contour tracings, which would suggest the use of smaller doses. At the average, the cardiologist and the function-analyst required 6 and 11 min of analysis time for a left ventricular study, respectively, emphasizing the need for further developments towards automated contour detection. Finally, an excellent correlation was found with a standard off-line cinefilm analysis procedure. Thus, it may be concluded that quantitative digital left ventricular angiography based on manual tracing of the outlines performed immediately following the cardiac catheterization (post-processing) is feasible as a routine procedure for the assessment of left ventricular function.     

Comparison of radionuclide angiography with three echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular function in patients after myocardial infarction

Aims. Left ventricular function is an important outcome measure in patients with coronary artery disease, in particular in patients after myocardial infarction. It is reliably assessed by radionuclide angiography, but echocardiographic wall motion scoring might be an attractive alternative. Methods. Four days after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction both radionuclide angiography and echocardiography were performed in 90 patients. Segmental wall motion scoring (WMSI) and visual estimation of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was done by 2 independent observers. Repeated analysis was performed 1 month after the first reading. In 41 patients the LVEF was assessed quantitatively by tracing of endocardial outlines of the left ventricle. Results. Both correlation with radionuclide angiography (estimated LVEF: r = 0.71, WMSI: r = – 0.68, Tracing: r = 0.59) and inter- and intra-observer variability (estimated LVEF: 19% and 15%, WMSI: 65% and 59%) were in favour of the LVEF estimation method. Correlation with radionuclide angiography measurements was related to the quality of the echocardiogram and to the extent of coronary artery disease. Conclusion. Simple echocardiographic estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients after reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction proved to be superior to quantitative assessment of ejection fraction and to segmental wall motion scoring in comparison with radionuclide angiography.     

Contrast echocardiography clarifies uninterpretable wall motion in intensive care unit patients

OBJECTIVES: The study examined the value of contrast echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) wall motion in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. BACKGROUND: Echocardiograms done in the ICU are often suboptimal. The most common indication is the evaluation of LV wall motion and ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiograms were done in 70 unselected ICU patients. Wall motion was evaluated on standard echocardiography (SE), harmonic echocardiography (HE), and after intravenous (IV) contrast echocardiography (CE) using a score for each of 16 segments. A confidence score was also given for each segment with each technique (unable to judge; not sure; sure). The EF was estimated visually for each technique, and a confidence score was applied to the EF. RESULTS: Uninterpretable wall motion was present in 5.4 segments/patient on SE, 4.4 on HE (p = 0.2), and 1.1 on CE (p < 0.0001). An average of 7.8 segments were read with surety on SE, 9.2 on HE (p = 0.1), and 13.7 on CE (p < 0.0001). Ejection fraction was uninterpretable in 23% on SE, 13% on HE (p = 0.14), and 0% on CE (p = 0.002 vs. HE; p < 0.0001 vs. SE). The EF was read with surety in 56% of patients on SE, 62% on HE (p = 0.47), and 91% on CE (p < 0.0001). Thus, wall motion was seen with more confidence on CE. More importantly, the actual readings of segmental wall motion and EF significantly differed using CE. CONCLUSIONS: CE should be used in all ICU patients with suboptimal transthoracic echocardiograms.     

Doppler tissue velocity sampling improves diagnostic accuracy during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the assessment of viable myocardium in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Both nuclear imaging with F18-fluorodeoxyglucose and dobutamine stress echocardiography have been used to identify viable myocardium, although dobutamine-stress echocardiography has been demonstrated to be the less sensitive of the two. AIM: To compare the accuracy of pulsed-wave Doppler tissue sampling with dobutamine-stress echocardiography for the detection of viable myocardium, using F18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging as a reference. Methods Forty patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction (mean ejection fraction 33+/-11%), underwent F18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging, dobutamine-stress echocardiography and pulsed-wave Doppler tissue sampling. Evaluation was performed using a six-segment model. RESULTS: Visual assessment by resting echo was feasible in 230 out of 240 segments (96%); 177 (77%) segments showed severe dyssynergy at rest. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging showed viability in 95 (54%) segments while 82 (46%) were non-viable. Ejection phase velocity at rest was not significantly different; ejection velocities during low-dose and peak-dose dobutamine, however, were significantly higher in viable myocardium (8.6+/-2.9 vs 6.0+/-1.8 and 9.3+/-3.1 vs 6.2+/-2.1 cm x s(-1)). Using receiver operating characteristic curves the optimal cut-off value for viability assessment was an increase in the ejection phase velocity low-dose of 1+/-0.5 cm x s(-1), while 0+/-0.5 cm x s(-1)predicted non-viability. The sensitivity and specificity (95%CI) of pulsed-wave Doppler tissue sampling and dobutamine-stress echocardiography for the prediction of viability was respectively 87% (82-92) vs 75% (67-81) (P<0.05) and 52% (44-59) vs 51% (45-59) (P=ns). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of pulsed-wave Doppler tissue sampling is superior to dobutamine-stress echocardiography for the assessment of myocardial viability.     

Accurate and reproducible measurement of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction by contrast echocardiography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the accuracy and reproducibility of contrast echocardiography versus tissue harmonic imaging for measurements of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Digital echo recordings of apical LV views before and after intravenous contrast were collected from 110 consecutive patients. Magnetic resonance imaging of multiple short-axis LV sections was performed with a 1.5-T scanner. Left ventricular volumes and EF were calculated offline by method of discs. Thirty randomly selected patients were reanalyzed for intraobserver and interobserver variability. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, contrast echo increased feasibility for single-plane and biplane volume analysis from 87% to 100% and from 79% to 95%, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated volume underestimation by echo, but much less pronounced with contrast. Limits of agreement between echo and MRI narrowed significantly with contrast: from -18.1% to 8.3% to -7.7% to 4.1% (EF), from -98.2 to -11.7 ml to -59.0 to 10.7 ml (end-diastolic volume), and from -58.8 to 21.8 ml to -38.6 to 23.9 ml (end-systolic volume). Ejection fraction from precontrast echo and MRI differed by > or =10% (EF units) in 23 patients versus 0 after contrast (p < 0.001). At intraobserver and interobserver analysis, limits of agreement for EF narrowed significantly with contrast. CONCLUSIONS: The two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of LV volumes and EF in non-selected cardiac patients was found to be more accurate and reproducible when adding an intravenous contrast agent.