Groin injecting in the context of crack cocaine and homelessness: From ‘risk boundary’ to ‘acceptable risk’?

Drawing on data from recent surveys and pilot qualitative interviews among injecting drug users (IDUs) in England, we highlight the potential ‘normalisation’ of the use of the femoral vein (groin) as a site of injection. We estimate that 45% (428/952) of IDUs in English cities report groin injecting in the last 4 weeks, rising to over 50% in some areas. We also note transitions towards the injection of crack cocaine among poly drug injectors in some UK locations. We estimate that 40% (381/952) of IDUs in English cities report crack injection in the last 4 weeks, rising to over 70% in some cities. Findings from pilot qualitative interviews among homeless injectors in London are suggestive of groin injecting being situated as an ‘acceptable risk’. We emphasise the need for research to explore the potential interplay between unstable housing, groin injecting and crack injecting. We call for renewed emphasis within harm reduction interventions advising injectors how to maximise the health and longevity of arm and other peripheral veins, and for greater preparedness to advise known groin injectors how to minimise health risks associated with groin injecting.     

Low knowledge and perceived Hepatitis C risk despite high risk behaviour among injection drug users in Kathmandu,Nepal

BackgroundIn Nepal, prevalence of Hepatitis C (HCV) among injecting drug users (IDUs) has been measured at 50% and knowledge of the virus is low. Rehabilitation and harm reduction attendees constitute populations to whom health care providers can deliver services. As such, characterizing their drug use and risk profiles is important for developing targeted service delivery. We measured drug use and risk patterns of IDUs participating in residential rehabilitation as well as those contacted through needle exchanges to identify correlates of drug use frequency, risky injection practices as well as HCV testing, knowledge and perceived risk.MethodsWe collected cross-sectional data from one-on-one structured interviews of IDUs contacted through needle-exchange outreach workers (n = 202) and those attending rehabilitation centres (behaviour immediately prior to joining rehabilitation) (n = 167).ResultsRoughly half of participants reported injecting at least 30 times in the past 30 days and individuals with previous residential rehabilitation experience reported frequent injection far more than those without it. About one in fourteen respondents reported past week risky injection practices. Participants were over three times as likely to report risky injection if they consumed alcohol daily (17.2%) than if they did not (5.0%) (p = 0.002). Those who reported injecting daily reported risky injection practices (11.9%) significantly more than non-daily injectors (1.8%) (p < 0.001). Respondents reported high HCV infection rates, low perceived risk, testing history and knowledge. HCV knowledge was not associated with differences in risky injecting.ConclusionTreatment centres should highlight the link between heavy drinking, frequent injection and risky injecting practices. The link between rehabilitation attendance and frequent injection may suggest IDUs with more severe use patterns are more likely to attend rehabilitation. Rehabilitation centres and needle exchanges should provide testing and education for HCV. Education alone may not be sufficient to initiate change since knowledge did not predict lower risk.     

Social context of needle selling in Baltimore, Maryland

Although much of the debate surrounding the distribution of sterile syringes to injection drug users (IDUs) has focused on needle exchange programs (NEPs), IDUs acquire their syringes from three major sources: NEPs, pharmacies, and secondary exchangers or needle sellers. The purpose of the present study is to examine types and frequencies of social interactions among drug injectors who sell needles, most of which come from NEPs, compared with individuals who do not sell needles. Specifically, we compared engagement in drug-related behaviors, roles in the drug economy, and social network membership. Data were collected as part of the SHIELD study, an HIV prevention intervention targeted at drug users and their social networks (n=910) from February 2001 through September 2003 in Baltimore, Maryland (USA). In this sample, 56 participants reported selling needles. Needle sellers had higher levels of engagement in drug-related social interactions, including using drugs with others, giving or receiving drugs from others, and buying drugs with other users. Participants who sold needles had a significantly higher number of roles in the drug economy. Also, they had more social network members who were injectors, with whom they talked about risky drug behaviors, gave needles to, and shared cookers and bleach with. Compared with nonselling injectors, needle sellers engage in HIV risk-related behaviors, such as injecting daily and sharing injection equipment, more frequently. The study's findings may be useful to determine whether secondary exchangers should be targeted for HIV prevention activities both to reduce their own risk and to diffuse risk reduction information throughout the drug using community.     

Social Context of Needle Selling in Baltimore,Maryland

Although much of the debate surrounding the distribution of sterile syringes to injection drug users (IDUs) has focused on needle exchange programs (NEPs), IDUs acquire their syringes from three major sources: NEPs, pharmacies, and secondary exchangers or needle sellers. The purpose of the present study is to examine types and frequencies of social interactions among drug injectors who sell needles, most of which come from NEPs, compared with individuals who do not sell needles. Specifically, we compared engagement in drug-related behaviors, roles in the drug economy, and social network membership. Data were collected as part of the SHIELD study, an HIV prevention intervention targeted at drug users and their social networks (n = 910) from February 2001 through September 2003 in Baltimore, Maryland (USA). In this sample, 56 participants reported selling needles. Needle sellers had higher levels of engagement in drug-related social interactions, including using drugs with others, giving or receiving drugs from others, and buying drugs with other users. Participants who sold needles had a significantly higher number of roles in the drug economy. Also, they had more social network members who were injectors, with whom they talked about risky drug behaviors, gave needles to, and shared cookers and bleach with. Compared with nonselling injectors, needle sellers engage in HIV risk-related behaviors, such as injecting daily and sharing injection equipment, more frequently. The study's findings may be useful to determine whether secondary exchangers should be targeted for HIV prevention activities both to reduce their own risk and to diffuse risk reduction information throughout the drug using community.     

Injecting alone among young adult IDUs in five US cities: evidence of low rates of injection risk behavior

Illicit drug injection typically occurs in private or semi-public settings where two or more injectors are present. In a large sample of young adult injectors (aged 15-30) in five US cities, we describe those who reported consistently injecting by themselves in a recent period. Among 3199 eligible subjects, 85% were male, median age was 24 years, and median number of years injecting was four. Fifteen percent (n=467) who reported always injecting alone in the previous 3 months were compared to other IDUs to understand the relationship between this practice and injection risk behavior. IDUs who reported injecting alone were substantially less likely to report injection with a syringe (AOR=0.16, 95% CI 0.1-0.2) or other drug preparation equipment (AOR=0.17, 95% CI 0.13-0.2) previously used by another injector. Markedly low rates of injection risk behavior were observed in IDUs who reported injecting alone; this practice may facilitate safe injection by granting the individual greater control over the injection setting. However, risks may include accidental overdose with severe consequences.     

Injection behaviors among injection drug users in treatment: the role of hepatitis C awareness

Background

Injection drug use (IDU) is a primary vector for blood-borne infections. Awareness of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection status may affect risky injection behaviors. This study determines the prevalence of risky injection practices and examines associations between awareness of positive HCV status and risky injection behaviors.

Methods

We surveyed individuals seeking treatment for substance use at 12 community treatment programs as part of a national HIV screening trial conducted within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. Participants reported socio-demographic characteristics, substance use, risk behaviors, and HCV status. We used multivariable logistic regression to test associations between participant characteristics and syringe/needle sharing.

Results

The 1281 participants included 244 (19.0%) individuals who reported injecting drugs in the past 6 months and 37.7% of IDUs reported being HCV positive. During the six months preceding baseline assessment, the majority of IDUs reported obtaining sterile syringes from pharmacies (51.6%) or syringe exchange programs (25.0%), but fewer than half of IDUs always used a sterile syringe (46.9%). More than one-third (38.5%) shared syringe/needles with another injector in the past 6 months. Awareness of positive HCV vs. negative/unknown status was associated with increased recent syringe/needle sharing (aOR 2.37, 95% CI 1.15, 4.88) in multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

Risky injection behaviors remain prevalent and awareness of HCV infection was associated with increased risky injection behaviors. New approaches are needed to broadly implement HCV prevention interventions for IDUs seeking addiction treatment.     

四川省凉山地区静脉吸毒人群药物滥用及其行为特征调查

目的:了解四川省凉山地区静脉吸毒人群药物滥用及行为特征情况,为采取有针对性的戒毒干预措施预防艾滋病病毒的传播提供数据.方法:以社区为基础招募了379名静脉吸毒人员,调查其人口学特征,艾滋病病毒感染情况,药物滥用的种类、吸毒方式和频率,口吸和静脉吸毒时间,共用注射器具情况等.结果:静脉吸毒人群艾滋病病毒感染率为11.3%(43/379).379名被调查者全部为海洛因滥用者,其中247人(65.2%)单独使用过海洛因,297人(78.4%)混合注射过海洛因与安定,滥用过的其他药物有安定(8.2%)和鸦片(1.3%).300人(79.2%)每天静脉注射吸毒一次及以上;曾经共用注射器具静脉吸毒的为247人(65.2%),87人(35.2%)首次静脉注射吸毒即与他人共用注射器具;初次口吸吸毒和静脉注射吸毒的平均年龄分别为22.37岁和25.35岁,口吸吸毒和静脉注射吸毒的平均时间分别为6.41年和3.42年.结论:加强青少年、吸毒人员关于毒品危害和拒绝毒品的健康教育活动,以及开展美沙酮或丁丙诺啡口服治疗海洛因依赖者,降低静脉注射吸毒行为,控制艾滋病病毒的传播.     

Sex related HIV risk behaviors: differential risks among injection drug users, crack smokers, and injection drug users who smoke crack

This study was designed to assess differences in sex-related risk behaviors between drug injectors who did not smoke crack cocaine, crack smokers who did not inject drugs, and drug users who both injected drugs and smoked crack. Current drug users (i.e. used within the past 30 days) from 22 cities were recruited and assessed. The sample (n = 26,982) included 28% who injected only, 42% who smoked crack only, and 30% who both injected and smoked crack. Results showed that active drug users were at risk of HIV infection through sexual transmission: in the 30 day period prior to their interview, 28% reported sex with two or more individuals, 23% had an IDU sex partner, and 24% had exchanged sex for drugs or money. In addition, more than 80% did not use a condom during sex. Crack only smokers and crack smoking injectors were more likely than injectors only to report multiple sex partners and exchanging sex. Because of these high risk behaviors, condom use was of particular importance. The number of days of alcohol use and having an IDU sex partner were independently associated with not using a condom. Crack smoking injectors reported the highest average number of days of alcohol consumption and were the most likely to have had an IDU sex partner.     

The role of "long-term" and "new" injectors in a declining HIV/AIDS epidemic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

BACKGROUND: A substantial decline of HIV prevalence has been observed in injection drug users (IDUs) from Rio de Janeiro, in recent years. Differential characteristics and behaviors of new (injecting for <6 years) and long-term (>=6y) injectors may help to understand recent changes and to implement appropriate prevention strategies. METHODS: Between October 1999 and December 2001, 609 active/ex-IDUs were recruited from different communities, interviewed, and tested for HIV. Contingency table analysis and t-tests were used to assess differences between new and long-term injectors. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of HIV serostatus for long-term and new injectors. RESULTS: HIV prevalence was 11.7% for 309 long-term injectors (95% CI 8.1-15.3) and 4.3% for 300 new injectors (95% CI 2.0-6.6). New injectors reported having engaged in treatment and having received syringes from needle exchange programs (NEPs) more frequently than long-term injectors in the last 6 months, but sharing behaviors remained frequent and even increased vis-à-vis long-term injectors. For male new injectors, "sexual intercourse with another man" was found to be the sole significant risk factor for HIV infection (Adj OR = 8.03; 95% CI 1.52-42.48). Among male long-term injectors, "to have ever injected with anyone infected with HIV" (Adj OR = 3.91; 95% CI 1.09-14.06) and to have "ever been in prison" (Adj OR = 2.56; 95% CI 1.05-6.24) were found to be significantly associated with HIV infection. DISCUSSION: New injectors are seeking help in drug treatment centers or needle exchange programs. They differ from long-term injectors in terms of their risk factors for HIV infection and have lower prevalence levels for HIV. Such differences may help to understand the recent dynamics of HIV/AIDS in this population and highlight the need to reinforce new injectors' help-seeking behavior and to reduce current unacceptably high levels of unprotected sex and syringe sharing in new injectors despite attendance of prevention/treatment programs.     

High-risk behaviors associated with transition from illicit non-injection to injection drug use among adolescent and young adult drug users: a case-control study

OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to elucidate characteristics of persons likely to transition into injection drug use so that an identifiable group with high-risk for blood-borne infection may be targeted for interventions. METHODS: An age-matched case-control analysis was performed from a cohort study in Baltimore, 1997-1999, of street-recruited non-injection and injection drug users (IDUs), aged 15-30. Cases were IDUs injecting < or = 2 years and controls were age-matched persons who used non-injection heroin, cocaine or crack. At baseline, all were interviewed about prior year-by-year behaviors; analysis using conditional logistic regression was based on information for the year prior to injection onset for the case and the same calendar time for the controls as well as recent behaviors for both groups. RESULTS: Of 270 participants, most were African American (78%), female (61%), and HIV seroprevalence was 7% at baseline. IDUs were significantly more likely than controls to be non-African American (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=0.09) and report high school dropout (AOR=2.32), early sex-trading (AOR=2.72), and recent violence victimization (AOR=9.28). CONCLUSION: Given that new injectors are at high-risk for HIV and hepatitis yet difficult to reach for prevention efforts, our data suggest some categories to use to target non-injectors who are likely to transition into injection use.     

A comparison of HIV risk behaviors between new and long-term injection drug users

The purpose of this study was to characterize the injection and sexual risk behaviors of a cohort of active drug injectors who have initiated injection within the past 4 years and to compare their behaviors with the risk behaviors of long-term injectors who have been injecting drugs since 1984. A stratified, network-based sample was used to recruit injection drug users from the streets in Miami-Dade, Florida. After screening for eligibility, which included a urine test to confirm current drug use, participants were administered a structured questionnaire that included basic demographic information, drug-use history, and HIV risk behavior practices. Both injector groups displayed a high level of HIV injection risk behavior. Although new initiates into injection demonstrated lower risk behavior than long-term injectors at the first injection episode, the current risk behavior between new and long-term injectors is similar.     

A COMPARISON OF HIV RISK BEHAVIORS BETWEEN NEW AND LONG-TERM INJECTION DRUG USERS

The purpose of this study was to characterize the injection and sexual risk behaviors of a cohort of active drug injectors who have initiated injection within the past 4 years and to compare their behaviors with the risk behaviors of long-term injectors who have been injecting drugs since 1984. A stratified, network-based sample was used to recruit injection drug users from the streets in Miami-Dade, Florida. After screening for eligibility, which included a urine test to confirm current drug use, participants were administered a structured questionnaire that included basic demographic information, drug-use history, and HIV risk behavior practices. Both injector groups displayed a high level of HIV injection risk behavior. Although new initiates into injection demonstrated lower risk behavior than long-term injectors at the first injection episode, the current risk behavior between new and long-term injectors is similar. [Translations are provided in the International Abstracts Section of this issue.]     

Differences in sexual behaviour and condom use among cocaine and opioid injectors in Santos, Toronto and London

This paper makes comparisons in the sexual risk behaviour of cocaine and opioid injecting drug users (IDUs) in the cities of Santos, Toronto and London. Using a standardised WHO Multi-City Study interview schedule, 6 months risk behaviour data were collected among 1204 community-recruited drug injectors in Santos (n=220), Toronto (n=479) and London (n=505). Statistically significant differences in patterns of drug injecting and sexual behaviour were found between the cities. Results show cocaine injection to be most likely in Santos and heroin injection to be most likely in London. Anonymous saliva samples show HlV-1 prevalence among IDUs to be significantly higher in Santos (60%) than in London (7.0%) or Toronto (4.5%). Santos IDUs also were statistically more likely than Toronto or London IDUs to report higher frequencies of penetrative sex with both primary and casual partners, sex in exchange for drugs or money, sex with same sex partners, anal sex with opposite sex partners, and lower levels of condom use. Santos IDUs also reported a higher average number of sexual partners (6.1) than IDUs in Toronto (3.7) or London (1.8). These findings show that sexual behaviour change among IDUs is needed most urgently in Santos, where rates of HlV-1 prevalence and casual partner change were highest and condom use lowest. Possible explanations for the observed behavioural differences include the impact of particular injected drugs on sexual activity/safety, and the impact of social and economic factors on risk behaviour. There is an absence of ‘social epidemiology’ in contemporary cross-national HIV research and this hinders the development of culturally appropriate interventions. Interventions, whether in developed or developing countries, not only need to promote changes in individual behaviour but also in the social and political environment.     

Strategies to avoid opiate withdrawal: Implications for HCV and HIV risks

BackgroundResearch on heroin withdrawal has primarily been done clinically, thus focussing on symptom severity, physiological manifestations, and how withdrawal impairs normal functioning. However, there is little scientific knowledge on how heroin withdrawal affects injection behaviour. This paper explores how withdrawal episodes heighten unsafe injection practices and how some long-term injectors manage such risks.MethodsWe interviewed 32 injection drug users in New York City who had been injecting drugs for 8–15 years (21 HIV and HCV uninfected; 3 HIV and HCV infected; and 8 singly infected with HCV). We used in-depth life history interviews to inquire about IDUs’ life history, injection practices and drug use behaviour over time. Analysis used grounded theory techniques.ResultsWithdrawal can enhance risk by undermining IDUs’ willingness to inject safely; increasing the likelihood of attending risky settings; raising the number of injection partners; and seeking ad hoc partners for drug or needle sharing. Some IDUs have developed practices to cope with withdrawal and avoid risky practices (examples include carrying clean needles to shooting galleries and sniffing rather than injecting). Strategies to avoid withdrawal include back up methods, resorting to credit, collaborating with others, regimenting drug intake, balancing drug intake with money available, and/or resorting to treatment.ConclusionWithdrawal periods can heighten risky injection practices. Some IDUs have applied strategies to avoid withdrawal or used practices to cope without engaging in risky practices. These behaviours might in turn help IDUs prevent an infection with hepatitis C or HIV.     

Injecting drug use,risk behaviour and risk environment in Hungary: A qualitative analysis

There is an absence of qualitative research investigating risk behaviour and risk environments associated with the transmission of blood-borne viruses (BBVs) among injecting drug users (IDUs) in Hungary. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 33 IDUs who had injected at least once during last 30 days. Participants were residents of Budapest and Pécs, mostly aged 22–25 years, and comprised 22 men and 11 women. The interviews focused on the preparation and division of drug solution and on the shared use of needles and syringes and other injecting paraphernalia, as well as the physical, social, economic and policy components of the injecting micro-environment. Interviews were analysed using Atlas.ti computer software. Findings identified that the division of the drug solution between injectors typically involved the shared use of cooking equipment, filters and water containers. Collective preparation was often followed by shared needle and syringe use. Withdrawal symptoms were perceived to increase the likelihood of such risky behaviour. This study highlights BBV risks arising from the micro-risk environment of injecting drug use, and emphasises the importance of setting and context in harm reduction interventions.     

Comparing Injection and Non-Injection Routes of Administration for Heroin,Methamphetamine, and Cocaine Users in the United States

ABSTRACT

Research examining the demographic and substance use characteristics of illicit drug use in the United States has typically failed to consider differences in routes of administration or has exclusively focused on a single route of administration—injection drug use. Data from National Survey on Drug Use and Health were used to compare past-year injection drug users and non-injection drug users' routes of administration of those who use the three drugs most commonly injected in the United States: heroin, methamphetamine, and cocaine. Injection drug users were more likely than those using drugs via other routes to be older (aged 35 and older), unemployed, possess less than a high school education, and reside in rural areas. IDUs also exhibited higher rates of abuse/dependence, perceived need for substance abuse treatment, and co-occurring physical and psychological problems. Fewer differences between IDUs and non-IDUs were observed for heroin users compared with methamphetamine or cocaine users.     

Comparing injection and non-injection routes of administration for heroin, methamphetamine, and cocaine users in the United States

Research examining the demographic and substance use characteristics of illicit drug use in the United States has typically failed to consider differences in routes of administration or has exclusively focused on a single route of administration?injection drug use. Data from National Survey on Drug Use and Health were used to compare past-year injection drug users and non-injection drug users' routes of administration of those who use the three drugs most commonly injected in the United States: heroin, methamphetamine, and cocaine. Injection drug users were more likely than those using drugs via other routes to be older (aged 35 and older), unemployed, possess less than a high school education, and reside in rural areas. IDUs also exhibited higher rates of abuse/dependence, perceived need for substance abuse treatment, and co-occurring physical and psychological problems. Fewer differences between IDUs and non-IDUs were observed for heroin users compared with methamphetamine or cocaine users.     

HIV prevalence and risk behaviors among new initiates into injection drug use over the age of 40 years old

Injection drug users (IDUs) who have recently initiated an injecting career have high risk behaviors for HIV infection. The average age of an IDUs first injection is typically reported as 19-20 years, and some literature has reported 'maturing out' of drug use typically around 40 years old. The purpose of this study was to discriminate risk behaviors among newer injectors by age of initiation. This cross-sectional study includes volunteers enrolled using extensive community recruitment techniques in 1988 and 1989 in Baltimore, MD. Of the 722 injection drug users who had initiated injection within the prior six years, 124 were over 35 years old of whom 53 were 40 years and older. Rates of HIV were lower among those over 40 years (13.2%) than those who were 35-39 years (22.5%) or under 35 years old (20.9%). The behavioral characteristics of those aged 35-39 were similar to those under 35 years old, but those over 40 years old when compared with less than 39 years reported injecting at least daily less frequently (88.7% vs 76.5%, p = 0.042), using a needle from a sterile wrapper (19.0% vs 36.6%, p = 0.006), and injecting with their own works (52.6% vs 28.8%, p = 0.021). This study shows that people initiate injection drug use across a wide age range and that needle hygiene practices early after initiation tend to be safer in older compared to younger initiates.     

Correlates of sharing injection equipment among male injecting drug users in Kathmandu, Nepal

BackgroundHIV prevalence is high and risky injection practices occur frequently among injecting drug users (IDUs) in Nepal. We explored the correlates of sharing injection equipment (having injected with a needle or syringe previously used by another) among male IDUs in Kathmandu, Nepal.MethodsFrom August to September 2007, we anonymously interviewed 296 male IDUs in Kathmandu, Nepal, using a structured questionnaire. We performed bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis and identified variables associated with sharing injection equipment.ResultsOver half (n = 152) of the participants reported injecting drugs with a needle or syringe previously used by another in the past year. Of these, 70% reported engaging in sharing injection equipment with multiple persons. The unavailability of new needles and drinking alcohol were independently associated with sharing injection equipment among the study participants.ConclusionsIDUs who drank alcohol or who could not obtain new needles when needed were more likely to share injection equipment. Our results suggest that reducing alcohol use and increasing the availability of new needles and syringes might improve safer injection practices among male IDUs in Kathmandu, Nepal.     

Overdosing among young injection drug users in San Francisco.

Heroin overdoses increased sharply in the US in the 1990s, but few studies have addressed overdose risk. We examined overdosing and injection-related risk behavior in young injection drug users (IDUs). We interviewed all consenting injectors under age 30 at needle exchanges and youth outreach sites in San Francisco. Their median age was 22, and their median number of years of injecting was 4. About 48% reported at least one overdose, with a median of two overdoses reported. Overdosing was associated with injecting "speedballs" (i.e. mixtures of heroin and cocaine), with borrowing syringes, and (with P-values of borderline statistical significance) with heroin injection and with gay or bisexual behavior. It was not associated with age, sex, years of injecting, or frequency of injecting. In multivariate analysis, only borrowing syringes and gay or bisexual behavior were independent statistically significant predictors, probably because gay and bisexual subjects were more likely to be heroin or "speedball" injectors. Most subjects (65%) reported that they had not received medical attention at time of last overdose. Risk of overdose in young injectors is acute and closely associated with HIV risk. HIV interventions should include overdose prevention. Emergency response protocols should minimize risk of arrest. Injectors and providers should be trained in overdose prevention, and developing overdose interventions should be a priority among drug educators.