The radiation oncologist's perspective on stereotactic radiosurgery

Unfavorable gliomas: The basis for single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is largely historical in nature and rooted in conventional thinking. This is derived from the original use of SRS in the treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), where the benefit of single-fraction high-dose radiation is clearly optimal in terms of addressing AVM obliteration kinetics. However, tumor cell kinetics are not the same as AVM obliteration kinetics and therefore may not be optimally addressed by single-fraction SRS. In addition, fractionated (F) SRS, as compared to single-fraction SRS, should allow for sparing of normal tissue damage. The relatively noninvasive nature of SRS allows for the potential of exploiting the use of FSRS and also allows for consideration of delivering FSRS in a split-course fashion. This provides an additional advantage over what can normally be achieved by use of stereotactic brachytherapy, in that sterotactic brachytherapy is likely to be performed only once in the course of a patient's primary treatment. This strategy exploits tumor and/or normal tissue cell kinetics, inclusive of attempting to counteract the initial accelerated tumor growth phase pre-CEBRT(conventional external beam radiation therapy), thereby decreasing the rate of clinical tumor progression during CEBRT. This split-course design should also help to counteract the effect of accelerated tumor repopulation post-CEBRT. Our unique experience with this approach in patients with unfavorable gliomas will be reviewed. Brain metastases: While whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) remains a standard of care in patients with brain metastases, is potential neurocognitive morbidity remains a poorly understood concern. Despite this, and with an increasing role of surgery and/or SRS in the primary management of patients with brain metastasis, recently reported experiences withholding WBRT as part of primary therapy for brain metastases have not analyzed the potential effects on neurological functional status and/or neurocognition associated with the increased risk of brain tumor recurrence seen with such a strategy. We recently evaluated the risk of symptomatic brain tumor recurrence and associated neurologic deficit in 36 patients treated for newly diagnosed unresected brain metastases treated by Gamma Knife SRS alone followed by planned observation. Among the 17 patients (47%) developing brain tumor recurrence, 71% (12/17) were symptomatic and 59% (10/17) had an associated neurologic deficit. Also of interest, the author (WFR) performed a secondary analysis of a randomized phase III study of accelerated hyperfractionation (AH) versus standard accelerated fractionation (AF) in patients with unresected brain metastases. Control of brain metastases had a significant impact on MMSE. It is only among patients with 'uncontrolled" brain metastases that a drop in MMSE score is seen. Details of these studies, along with others, will be reviewed and implications with regards to the complementary role of WBRT in patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases will be discussed.     

The Role of Whole Brain Radiation Therapy for the Management of Brain Metastases in the Era of Stereotactic Radiosurgery

The goals of treatment for brain metastases (BMs) include preservation of function and improvement of survival. Although whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been a mainstay in the treatment of BMs, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) monotherapy has been increasingly used because of concern about the deterioration of neurocognitive function as a late adverse effect of WBRT. The results of four randomized controlled trials comparing focal treatment alone versus focal treatment combined with WBRT have shown, however, that SRS monotherapy significantly increases the risk of brain tumor recurrence (BTR) and that this increased risk of BTR may cause deterioration of neurocognitive function. We suggest identifying patients according to their risk of BTR when selecting treatment. Patients who have solitary BM with the absence of extracranial metastases may be indicated for SRS monotherapy given the lower risk of BTR compared with those having multiple BMs or extracranial metastases.     

Radiation therapy for brain metastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies that metastasize to the brain. Radiation therapy plays a central role in the management of brain metastases. METHODS: The medical records of 36 patients with brain metastases from breast cancer who underwent whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) at Kyoto University Hospital between 1993 and 2001 were reviewed. The treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median age at the time of diagnosis of brain metastases was 52 years. Only 4 patients (11%) had a single metastasis, while the others had multiple metastases. Uncontrolled extracranial metastases were present in 26 patients at the time of diagnosis of brain metastases. All patients received WBRT at a median dose of 31 Gy. Eight patients received conventional external-beam boost irradiation, and 2 received boost stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The overall median survival time was 7.9 months. Uncontrolled extracranial metastases except for bone metastases and old age were significantly associated with a poor survival rate. Twenty-six patients (82%) showed initial response, but 15 developed CNS failure, including 9 patients whose tumor recurred at the original site, 4 patients who developed tumors elsewhere in the brain and 3 patients who exhibited meningeal spread. The median duration of intracranial failure was 5.0 months. Whole-brain dose, and total tumor dose did not affect intracranial control. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy yielded a high initial response, but the duration of effect was limited with external beam irradiation alone. New treatment strategies such as adding SRS need to be studied further.     

Application of recursive partitioning analysis and evaluation of the use of whole brain radiation among patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for newly diagnosed brain metastases

PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) for brain metastases among patients receiving stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 135 patients who underwent linear accelerator (Linac) (n = 73) or Gamma Knife (n = 62) SRS for newly diagnosed brain metastases at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 8/89 and 12/98. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of age, primary site, control of the primary, interval to development of brain metastases (disease-free interval [DFI]), number of brain metastases, presence of extracranial metastases, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), treatment of brain metastases, and RPA class on overall survival. RESULTS: Application of the RPA classification revealed 29 patients fit the criteria for class I, 96 for class II, and 10 for class III. All of the patients underwent SRS. Fifty-seven patients also received WBRT at the time of initial presentation (SRS and immediate WBRT), and 78 patients received WBRT only if CNS relapse occurred (SRS alone). The median survival for all patients was 7.9 months (range: 1.1-90.1), and was 11.2 months for RPA class I compared to 6. 9 months for RPA classes II-III (p = 0.016). Median survival was 10. 5 months following SRS alone compared to 6.4 months following SRS and WBRT (p = 0.07). On univariate analysis, KPS >/= 80% (p = 0.002) and absence of systemic disease (p = 0.013) were also associated with longer survival, whereas control of the primary, DFI, and number of brain metastases did not have an impact. Multivariate analysis revealed only RPA class (p = 0.023) to be an independent predictor for overall survival, whereas treatment group (p = 0.079) was only marginally significant. At 2 years, immediate WBRT improved control at the original site of metastases (80% vs. 52%, p = 0.03) and prevention of new metastatic sites within the brain, 74% vs. 48% (p = 0.06). The 2-year intracranial disease-free survival was 60% following SRS and WBRT compared to only 34% following SRS alone (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the inherent biases to select more favorable patients for SRS, the RPA class retains its prognostic value. Omission of WBRT from the initial management was not detrimental in terms of overall survival; however, progressive disease occurred in over 50% of patients treated in this manner. Further studies are required to determine which, if any, patients should be considered for SRS with WBRT held in reserve.     

The treatment of brain metastases from malignant melanoma

Metastasis to the CNS develops in nearly half of patients with advanced melanoma; in 15% to 20% of these patients, the CNS is the first site of relapse. While systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma produces objective responses in 15% to 50% of patients, the available drugs do not penetrate well into the CNS, and these patients rarely benefit from systemic therapy. Although brain metastasis may be treated with surgery and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) when disease is limited to approximately one to three lesions, treatment for patients with large or multiple metastases is limited to whole brain irradiation (WBRT). While formal response and survival analyses of the impact of WBRT in melanoma have not been reported, the estimated median survival time for unselected patients with CNS metastases is only 2 to 4 months, with 1-year survival rates of less than 13%. In a selected population of patients with limited CNS involvement, surgical resection alone or in combination with WBRT appears to prolong median survival. More recently, SRS has been shown to be an effective local treatment for selected patients with brain metastases. In several retrospective reports of patients with melanoma CNS metastases, treatment with surgical resection alone or in combination with WBRT has been demonstrated to prolong median survival. More recently, SRS has been shown to be an effective local treatment for selected patients with brain metastases. In several retrospective reports, patients with CNS metastases from melanoma treated with a combination of WBRT plus SRS or SRS alone had median survivals and rates of control in the CNS superior to published reports for traditional WBRT. Most of these patients died from progressive extracranial disease with locally controlled CNS disease. Investigation of the contribution of newer systemic agents to the control of melanoma metastatic to the CNS has been based on the identification of drugs that have antitumor activity and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Fotemustine is a nitrosourea that produced similar activity in CNS metastasis as in systemic disease, with a response rate of about 25%. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent that acts via the same mechanism as dacarbazine (DTIC), the most active single agent in melanoma. TMZ, which is highly active in brain tumors, has also been associated with activity in systemic and CNS metastases in melanoma patients, also in the 25% range. Efforts are underway to assess the additive benefit of TMZ and other drugs to WBRT or focused radiotherapy in this disease.     

Radiotherapy of brain metastases of breast cancer

Twenty-two patients with brain metastases of breast cancer treated by irradiation between 1974 and 1983 were reviewed. Significant neurologic improvement was obtained in 80%. The median duration of symptomatic palliation caused by irradiation and the median survival from the diagnosis of brain metastases were 3.0 months and 5.0 months, respectively. As a favorable prognosis can be expected for patients showing good performance, minor neurologic disorders, a long latent period between the first treatment of the primary lesion and the onset of the brain metastasis, and without extracranial metastases, irradiation with more than 40 Gy is recommended. Sequential CT examinations were useful to judge the effectiveness of treatment.     

Radiation therapy for brain metastases in breast cancer patients

Most randomized comparison trials (RCTs) investigating treatments for brain metastases (BM) have included BM from any origin; as a result, more than half (52.4–77.0%) of the BM in these trials originated from the lungs (mostly non-small-cell lung cancer, NSCLC), with the breasts being the origin in only 6.8–19.0% of cases. In addition, patients with poor systemic status (KPS < 70) were not included in these trials. Hence, before we can apply RCT-based information to the daily clinical treatment of BM from breast cancers, it will be crucial to differentiate the characteristics of BM originating from NSCLC and BM originating from breast cancer. Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used in Japan, level-1 evidence suggests that the benefit of using SRS in addition to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been proven only for patients with a single BM. Treatment with SRS alone, which is widely used in Japan, seems attractive because it could avoid the risk of long-term adverse effects of WBRT. However, level-1 evidence suggests that the omission of WBRT results in a high frequency of brain tumor recurrence (BTR). In an RCT between SRS-alone and SRS + WBRT conducted in Japan, we found that patients who had a single BM and no extracranial metastases had a low risk of developing BTR after initial brain management (low-risk group) compared with those who had 2 or more BM and extracranial metastases (high-risk group). In order to meet the criteria of “low-risk” BTR, patients also should have good systemic status (KPS ≧ 70). Epidemiologic data suggest that the prognosis is twice as likely to be poor in patients with BM from breast cancer (RPA III = KPS < 70) than in patients with BM from NSCLC (40 vs. 20%); in addition, the probability of brain-only metastases in patients with breast cancer is less than half that in patients with NSCLC (20–25 vs. 60–75%). Considering these findings, we should be aware that most patients with BM from breast cancer are not good candidates for SRS alone, and, therefore, the role of WBRT is still important in the era of modern radiation techniques.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery in elderly patients with brain metastases

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly employed as an alternative to whole brain radiation therapy in patients with brain metastases, with the aim to reduce its potential toxicity. We have evaluated clinical outcomes of SRS as initial treatment for brain metastases in patients 70 years and older. Between November 2007 and October 2011, 102 patients of 70 years and older with 1–4 metastases were treated with SRS. The primary end point of the study was overall survival. Secondary end points were local control and distant failure rates, cause of death, performance measurements, and toxicity of treatment. At a median follow-up of 11.0 months (range 1–48 months), median survival and median time to distant failure were 13.2 and 10 months, respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 63 and 28 %, and respective distant failure rates were 54 and 78 %. Forty-five patients succumbed to their extracranial disease and 14 patients died of progressive intracranial disease. Nine patients recurred locally after SRS. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 90 and 84 %, respectively. Evaluation of neurocognitive function using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) showed no significant neurocognitive decline after SRS. MMSE score improved in 15 % of patients, worsened in 12 % of patients, and remained stable in the others. Severe neurological complications were reported in 7 (7 %) patients, requiring surgery or medical treatment. Initial treatment with SRS with close monitoring may represent a relatively safe treatment strategy associated with survival benefit, with outcomes similar to those reported in historical series of SRS for younger patients.     

Treatment outcome for patients with primary nonsmall-cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastasis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of treatment for patients with newly diagnosed nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an isolated, single, synchronous brain metastasis. A retrospective review was performed evaluating any patient diagnosed between 1982 and 1996 at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation with NSCLC metastatic only to the brain. Patients with multiple brain metastases or with systemic metastases to any other organ were excluded. Survival was measured from the date of the first treatment for malignancy. All hospital records were thoroughly reviewed in a retrospective manner. Thirty-three patients were identified who met the study criteria. Twelve patients had primary disease limited to the lung and hilar nodes, and 21 had more advanced primary disease with involvement of the mediastinum. Treatment of the chest was considered aggressive in 13 patients and palliative in 15. The primary tumor was observed in 5 patients. The management of the brain metastasis was as follows: 21 patients underwent surgical resection and postoperative whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), 5 underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and WBRT, 3 had resection alone, 2 had SRS alone, and 2 underwent WBRT alone. The median overall and disease-free survival for all patients was 6.9 months and 3.3 months, respectively. Overall survival was markedly improved with the addition of WBRT (P = 0.002) and with the aggressive management of the primary tumor (P = 0.005). A total of 9 patients experienced CNS failure, including both patients receiving WBRT alone. CNS failures were divided as follows: 3 local, 5 distant, and 1 local and distant. Two of the 4 patients with a local failure were salvaged, and ultimate local control of the original brain metastasis was achieved in 93.6% of cases. Survival remains poor for patients with Stage IV NSCLC even when metastatic disease is limited to a single site within the brain; however, aggressive therapy of both the lung primary and the brain metastasis may provide a survival advantage. Excellent local control of single brain metastases was achieved with a combination of WBRT with either surgical resection or SRS.     

Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered in 2–5 fractions (multi-fraction SRS) has been employed in patients with brain metastases as an alternative to single-fraction SRS with the aim to reduce late radiation-induced toxicity while maintaining high local control rate. In the present study we have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of multi-fraction SRS in patients with 1–3 brain metastases. Between March 2006 and October 2012, 135 patients (63 men and 72 women) with 171 brain metastases have been treated with multi-fraction SRS (3 × 9 Gy or 3 × 12 Gy). At a median follow-up of 11.4 months, 16 lesions recurred locally. The 1- and 2-year local control rates were 88 and 72 %, respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 57 and 25 %, and respective distant failure rates were 52 and 73 %. Seventy-eight percent of patients succumbed to their extracranial disease and 22 % died of progressive intracranial disease. Multivariate analysis showed that melanoma histology was predictive of local failure (p = 0.02; HR 6.1, 95 % CI 1.5–24). Specifically, the 1-year local control rates were 68 % for melanoma, 92 % for breast carcinoma, and 88 % for NSCLC, respectively. Stable extracranial disease (p = 0.004) and Karnofsky performance status (p = 0.01) were predictive of longer survival. Radiologic changes suggestive of radionecrosis occurred in 12 (7 %) out of 171 lesions, with an actuarial risk of 9 % at 1 year and 17 % at 2 years, respectively. In conclusion, multi-fraction SRS appears to be an effective and safe treatment modality for brain metastases. It may represent an alternative to single-dose SRS for patients with large lesions or lesions located near critical structures.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: results and prognostic factors

This study was conducted to determine prognostic factors for tumor response and patient survival after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis. Eighty-four patients with brain metastasis underwent SRS at a single institution. After fixation of the head with a stereotactic frame, computed tomography treatment planning was performed. The metastatic lesion was treated with multiple arcs to a median dose of 19 Gy. Forty-seven patients (56%) had a solitary brain lesion. Fifty-nine patients (70%) had evidence of extracranial disease at the time of SRS. The median survival duration from SRS was 7 months. Sixty-three percent of the patients had an objective radiographic response to SRS, which in turn was associated with superior central nervous system control. Age, collimator size, number of arcs, tumor location, and histology did not influence objective response rates. Patients who had a solitary lesion or who received treatment within 2 weeks after diagnosis were more likely to have an objective response than were those who did not (P < 0.05). Progressive brain disease accounted for 37% of the deaths. Nineteen patients (23%) had an in-field relapse. Four severe complications were attributed to SRS. This study confirms the role of SRS as an acceptable treatment option for patients with solitary or limited brain metastases. Int. J. Cancer (Radiat. Oncol. Invest.) 90, 157-162 (2000).     

Long-term survivors after gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastases

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery, with or without whole-brain radiation therapy, has become a valued management choice for patients with brain metastases, although their median survival remains limited. In patients who receive successful extracranial cancer care, patients who have controlled intracranial disease are living longer. The authors evaluated all brain metastasis in patients who lived for > or = 4 years after radiosurgery to determine clinical and treatment patterns potentially responsible for their outcome. METHODS: Six hundred seventy-seven patients with brain metastases underwent 781 radiosurgery procedures between 1988 and 2000. Data from the entire series were reviewed; and, if patients had > or = 4 years of survival, then they were evaluated for information on brain and extracranial treatment, symptoms, imaging responses, need for further care, and management morbidity. These long-term survivors were compared with a cohort who lived for < 3 months after radiosurgery (n = 100 patients). RESULTS: Forty-four patients (6.5%) survived for > 4 years after radiosurgery (mean, 69 mos with 16 patients still alive). The mean age at radiosurgery was 53 years (maximum age, 72 yrs), and the median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 90. The lung (n = 15 patients), breast (n = 9 patients), kidney (n = 7 patients), and skin (melanoma; n = 6 patients) were the most frequent primary sites. Two or more organ sites outside the brain were involved in 18 patients (41%), the primary tumor plus lymph nodes were involved in 10 patients (23%), only the primary tumor was involved in 9 patients (20%), and only brain disease was involved in 7 patients (16%), indicating that extended survival was possible even in patients with multiorgan disease. Serial imaging of 133 tumors showed that 99 tumors were smaller (74%), 22 tumors were unchanged (17%), and 12 tumors were larger (9%). Four patients had a permanent neurologic deficit after brain tumor management, and six patients underwent a resection after radiosurgery. Compared with the patients who had limited survival (< 3 mos), long-term survivors had a higher initial KPS (P = 0.01), fewer brain metastases (P = 0.04), and less extracranial disease (P < 0.00005). CONCLUSIONS: Although the expected survival of patients with brain metastases may be limited, selected patients with effective intracranial and extracranial care for malignant disease can have prolonged, good-quality survival. The extent of extracranial disease at the time of radiosurgery was predictive of outcome, but this does not necessarily mean that patients cannot live for years if treatment is effective.     

Salvage stereotactic radiosurgery for breast cancer brain metastases: outcomes and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND:

Salvage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is often considered in breast cancer patients previously treated for brain metastases. The goal of this study was to analyze clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for survival in the salvage setting.

METHODS:

The authors retrospectively examined 79 consecutive breast cancer patients who received salvage SRS (interval of >3 months after initial therapy), 76 of whom (96%) received prior whole‐brain radiation therapy. Overall survival (OS) and central nervous system (CNS) progression‐free survival rates were calculated from the date of SRS using the Kaplan‐Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS:

Median age was 50.5 years. Fifty‐eight percent of this population was estrogen receptor positive, 62% was HER2 positive, and 10% was triple negative. At the time of SRS, 95% had extracranial metastases, with 81% of extracranial metastases at other visceral sites (lung/pleura/liver). Forty‐eight percent had stable extracranial disease. Median interval from initial brain metastases therapy to SRS was 8.4 months. Median CNS progression‐free survival after SRS was 5.7 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3.6‐11 months), and median OS was 9.8 months (IQR, 3.8‐18 months). Eighty‐two percent of evaluable patients received further systemic therapy after SRS. HER2 status (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; P = .008) and extracranial disease status (adjusted HR, 2.7; P = .004) were significant prognostic factors for survival on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with good Karnofsky performance status, salvage SRS for breast cancer brain metastases is a reasonable treatment option, given an associated median survival in excess of 9 months. Furthermore, patients with HER2‐positive tumors at diagnosis or stable extracranial disease at the time of SRS have an improved clinical course, with median survival of >1 year. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Nonsmall cell lung cancer presenting with synchronous solitary brain metastasis

BACKGROUND: Solitary brain metastases occur in about 50% of patients with brain metastases from nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard of care is surgical resection of solitary brain metastases, or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plus whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). However, the optimal treatment for the primary site of newly diagnosed NSCLC with a solitary brain metastasis is not well defined. The goal was to distinguish which patients might benefit from aggressive treatment of their lung primary in patients whose solitary brain metastasis was treated with surgery or SRS. METHODS: The cases of 84 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients presenting with a solitary brain metastasis and treated from December 1993 through June 2004 were retrospectively reviewed at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. All patients had undergone either craniotomy (n = 53) or SRS (n = 31) for management of the solitary brain metastasis. Forty-four patients received treatment of their primary lung cancer using thoracic radiation therapy (median dose 45 Gy; n = 8), chemotherapy (n = 23), or both (n = 13). RESULTS: The median Karnofsky performance status score was 80 (range, 60-100). Excluding the presence of the brain metastasis, 12 patients had AJCC Stage I primary cancer, 27 had Stage II disease, and 45 had Stage III disease. The median follow-up was 9.7 months (range, 1-86 months). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates from time of lung cancer diagnosis were 49.8%, 16.3%, 12.7%, and 7.6%, respectively. The median survival times for patients by thoracic stage (I, II, and III) were 25.6, 9.5, and 9.9 months, respectively (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: By applying American Joint Committee on Cancer staging to only the primary site, the thoracic Stage I patients in our study with solitary brain metastases had a more favorable outcome than would be expected and was comparable to Stage I NSCLC without brain metastases. Aggressive treatment to the lung may be justified for newly diagnosed thoracic Stage I NSCLC patients with a solitary brain metastasis, but not for locally advanced NSCLC patients with a solitary brain metastasis.     

Patient selection criteria for the treatment of brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery

In this study we evaluate prognostic factors that predict local-regional control and survival following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with brain metastasis and establish guidelines for patient selection. Our evaluation is based on 73 patients with brain metastasis treated with SRS at the University of Minnesota between March 1991 and November 1995. The ability of stereotactic radiosurgery to improve local control in patients with brain metastases is confirmed in our study in which only 6 of 62 patients failed locally after SRS, with an actuarial local progression-free survival of 80% at 2 years. Variables that predicted worse prognosis were larger tumor size (p=0.05) for local progression-free survival and multiplicity of metastasis (p=0.03) and infratentiorial location of metastases (p=0.006) for regional progression-free survival. Absence of extracranial disease, KPS 70, and single intracranial metastasis were significant predictors of longer survival. Patients who fulfill all three criteria will survive longer after SRS (MS=17.7 months) and will most likely benefit from the increase local control in the brain achieved by SRS. Survival in patients who do not meet any of these criteria is very poor (MS=1.5 months), and these patients are less likely to benefit from this treatment. Careful selection of patients for SRS is warranted.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery alone versus resection plus whole-brain radiotherapy for 1 or 2 brain metastases in recursive partitioning analysis class 1 and 2 patients

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone with resection plus whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for the treatment of patients in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class 1 and 2 who had 1 or 2 brain metastases. METHODS: Two hundred six patients in RPA class 1 and 2 who had 1 or 2 brain metastases were analyzed retrospectively. Patients in Group A (n = 94) received from 18 grays (Gy) to 25 Gy SRS, and patients in Group B (n = 112) underwent resection of their metastases and received 10 x 3 Gy/20 x 2 Gy WBRT. Eight other potential prognostic factors were evaluated regarding overall survival (OS), brain control (BC), and local control (LC) of treated metastases: age, sex, performance status, tumor type, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, RPA class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment of brain metastases. RESULTS: A comparison of the 2 treatment groups did not reveal significantly different OS (P = .19), BC (P = .52), or LC (P = .25). In RPA subgroup analyses, outcome also did not differ significantly for either RPA class of patients (P values from .21 to .83). On multivariate analysis, improved OS was associated with age < or =60 years (relative risk [RR], 1.75; P = .002), better performance status (RR, 1.67; P = .015), no extracranial metastases (RR, 2.84; P < .001), interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment >12 months (RR, 1.70; P = .003), and RPA class 1 (RR, 1.51; P = .016). Improved BC was associated with a single metastasis (RR, 1.54; P = .034) and an interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment >12 months (RR, 1.58; P = .019), and improved LC was associated with an interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment >12 months (RR, 1.59; P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: SRS alone appeared to be as effective as resection plus WBRT in the treatment of 1 or 2 brain metastases for patients in RPA class 1 and 2. Patient outcomes were associated with age, Karnofsky performance status, number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, RPA class, and interval from tumor diagnosis to treatment.     

X射线立体定向放射治疗配合全脑照射治疗脑转移瘤疗效分析

目的　分析X射线立体定向放射治疗(SRS)配合全脑照射治疗脑转移瘤的作用。方法　对55例脑转移瘤患者进行SRS配合全脑照射,17例行单纯SRS治疗。全脑照射采用8?MVX射线,1.5～2.0 Gy/次,DT30～42 Gy,4～5周;SRS处方剂量为18～30 Gy,SRS前行全脑放射治疗39例,SRS后行全脑放射治疗16例。结果　SRS加全脑照射组病变完全消失(CR)占60.0%,部分消失(PR)占32.7%,无变化(NC)占7.3%,总缓解率(CR+PR)为92.7%;与单纯SRS组的35.0%、41.2%、23.5%、76.2%相比差异无显著性意义（χ2=3.47,P＞0.05）。SRS加全脑照射组复发率为14.5%,中位复发时间为10个月,中位生存时间为13个月;与单纯SRS组的41.2%、4个月、7.5个月相比差异有显著性意义(χ     

Radiotherapeutic management of brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The management of brain metastases is a significant health care problem. An estimated 20-40% of cancer patients will develop metastatic cancer to the brain during the course of their illness. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized trials on adult cancer patients with single or multiple brain metastases from cancer of any histology was conducted. Eligible studies investigated external beam radiotherapy or radiosurgery in one of the study arms. Outcomes of interest included survival, intracranial progression-free duration, response of brain metastases to therapy, quality of life, symptom control, neurological function, and toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-seven trials were included in this systematic review of the evidence. Pooled results from three randomized trials of surgical excision combined with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) showed no improvement in overall survival as compared to WBRT alone in patients with single brain metastasis. One randomized study of postoperative WBRT following excision of a single brain metastasis versus surgery alone detected a significant reduction in intracranial tumour recurrence rates but no corresponding difference in overall survival. Nine trials of altered dose-fractionation schedules compared to a standard control fractionation schedule (3000 cGy in 10 fractions) of WBRT showed no difference in probability of survival at 6 months. The addition of radiosensitizers, as assessed in five trials, did not confer additional benefit to WBRT in terms of overall survival or the frequency of brain metastases response. Three trials examined the use of WBRT and radiosurgery boost versus WBRT alone in selected patients with brain metastases. Overall survival did not improve for patients with multiple brain metastases. However, one trial reported an improvement in survival for patients with single brain metastasis treated with WBRT and radiosurgery boost. One older randomized trial examined the use of WBRT versus supportive care alone (using oral prednisone). Results were not conclusive. CONCLUSION: For patients with a single brain metastasis, good performance status, and minimal or no evidence of extracranial disease, surgical excision and postoperative WBRT improves survival (as compared to WBRT alone). There may be a small survival advantage associated with the use of radiosurgery boost and WBRT as compared to WBRT alone in selected patients with a single brain metastasis. There is no difference in overall survival or in neurologic function improvement with the use of altered whole brain dose-fractionation schedules as compared to standard fractionation schedules (3000 cGy in 10 fractions or 2000 cGy in 5 fractions). There is no survival benefit associated with the use of radiosurgery boost and WBRT versus WBRT alone in patients with multiple brain metastases. Currently, neither chemotherapy nor radiosensitizers show a clear benefit in the objective parameters of survival and progression-free survival. For patients with poor performance status and active extracranial disease, steroids and supportive care are an option.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Multiple brain metastases are a common health problem, frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer. The prognosis, even after treatment with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), is poor with average expected survivals less than 6 months. Retrospective series of stereotactic radiosurgery have shown local control and survival benefits in case series of patients with solitary brain metastases. We hypothesized that radiosurgery plus WBRT would provide improved local brain tumor control over WBRT alone in patients with two to four brain metastases. METHODS: Patients with two to four brain metastases (all < or =25 mm diameter and known primary tumor type) were randomized to initial brain tumor management with WBRT alone (30 Gy in 12 fractions) or WBRT plus radiosurgery. Extent of extracranial cancer, tumor diameters on MRI scan, and functional status were recorded before and after initial care. RESULTS: The study was stopped at an interim evaluation at 60% accrual. Twenty-seven patients were randomized (14 to WBRT alone and 13 to WBRT plus radiosurgery). The groups were well matched to age, sex, tumor type, number of tumors, and extent of extracranial disease. The rate of local failure at 1 year was 100% after WBRT alone but only 8% in patients who had boost radiosurgery. The median time to local failure was 6 months after WBRT alone (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-8.5) in comparison to 36 months (95% CI, 15.6-57) after WBRT plus radiosurgery (p = 0.0005). The median time to any brain failure was improved in the radiosurgery group (p = 0.002). Tumor control did not depend on histology (p = 0.85), number of initial brain metastases (p = 0.25), or extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.26). Patients who received WBRT alone lived a median of 7.5 months, while those who received WBRT plus radiosurgery lived 11 months (p = 0.22). Survival did not depend on histology or number of tumors, but was related to extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.02). There was no neurologic or systemic morbidity related to stereotactic radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: Combined WBRT and radiosurgery for patients with two to four brain metastases significantly improves control of brain disease. WBRT alone does not provide lasting and effective care for most patients.     

Palliative radiotherapy for metastatic malignant melanoma: brain metastases, bone metastases, and spinal cord compression

The records of all patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for malignant melanoma metastatic to brain, to bone, or with spinal cord compression were reviewed. The median survival of 77 patients with brain metastases from the initiation of radiotherapy was 14 weeks. A statistically improved survival was observed only in the 10 patients who underwent subtotal to total resection of a solitary brain metastasis prior to radiotherapy (median = 36 weeks). No improved survival was observed in the 12 patients with a solitary brain metastasis treated by radiotherapy alone (median = 16 weeks). Multivariate analysis revealed that fraction size, total dose, patient age, sex, and duration of the interval between initial diagnosis and appearance of brain metastases did not significantly influence survival, but the use of chemotherapy was associated with a decreased survival. Twenty six patients with symptomatic and radiographic evidence of 39 bone metastases showed a palliative response rate of 85%. 18 of 20 bony lesions treated with high-dose-per-fraction (greater than or equal to 400 cGy) and 15 of 19 bony lesions treated with conventional fractionation (less than or equal to 300 cGy) were palliated. Total dose, patient age, sex, interval between initial diagnosis of malignant melanoma and the appearance of bone metastases, prior or concurrent chemotherapy, or lesion location did not significantly influence palliation. Seventeen patients were identified with symptomatic and myelographic evidence of spinal cord compression. Complete palliation was observed in 47% (8/17) and partial palliation was observed in 24% (4/17). The overall palliation response rate for neurologic symptoms due to spinal cord compression of 71% appeared to be independent of fraction size and total dose.