Advances in the management of pediatric trauma

BACKGROUND: Numerous important advances have been made in the management of trauma in childhood in prevention, prehospitalization and intrahospital care, postoperative management, and rehabilitation. As with adult trauma care, the development of trauma systems has impacted greatly on morbidity and mortality in injured children. DATA SOURCES: Recent literature was searched for information regarding selected aspects of pediatric trauma care where significant improvements in outcome have occurred. The specific areas selected because of their contribution to improved outcomes include changes in the organization of care including the establishment of trauma centers and trauma systems, understanding trauma physiology as a basis for care, selective management of blunt trauma, management of burn injury, and prevention. CONCLUSION: Because of the various advances in the understanding of the effects of injury that have been translated to improved approaches to treatment, overall treatment mortality in childhood has dropped 45% over the last 20 years and mortality with burn injury has been reduced by half in patients with over 60% of body surface burn and almost eliminated below that level unless there are additional circumstances. Nonetheless, trauma is still the leading cause of death in childhood, so continuing commitment by pediatric surgeons to advancing trauma care for children is in order as well as providing education for adult surgeons willing to commit themselves to care of the injured child.     

Can adult trauma surgeons care for injured children?

Large urban trauma centers care for injured children as well as adults in many areas of the country, but the quality of care in these hospitals has not been evaluated versus that available at pediatric trauma centers. The recent validation of TRISS methodology in pediatric populations allowed us to evaluate the quality of pediatric trauma care being provided in a level I trauma center treating injured patients of all ages. We reviewed the records of 353 injured children (aged 0-17 years) who were admitted to our trauma center over a 30-month period for the following data: demographics, mechanism of injury, initial physiologic status (RTS), surgical procedures required, need for intensive care, nature and severity of the injuries (ISS), and outcome. TRISS analysis allowed us to compare our population with the Major Trauma Outcome Study. Only two of the 21 total deaths (overall mortality, 6%) were unexpected, and there were seven unexpected survivors. One hundred twenty-one patients underwent emergency surgical procedures and 63 required admission to the intensive care unit. The Z scores ranged from +0.32 for the children aged less than 2 years to +3.98 for the older age group (14-17 years). We conclude that the quality of care for pediatric trauma patients admitted to trauma centers that care for patients of all ages compares favorably with national standards. In most areas of the country, improvements in pediatric trauma care will likely come from addressing the special needs of injured children in general trauma centers rather than from developing separate pediatric facilities.     

The evolution and current status of emergency medical services for children

Emergency physicians have come to believe that comprehensive pediatric emergency care should be integrated into an overall medical system and organized regionally to address the special needs of children. Since our emergency medical systems have evolved in the care of adult trauma victims, we must look to that development for the origin of our present emergency medical services for children. Not until the 1970s did it became obvious that children, just as adults, should be included in an comprehensive emergency medical system for the care of their life threatening injuries. Since there is considerable overlap in the basic principles of trauma resuscitation and management of shock in children and adults, most children's regional trauma program developed as a part of an overall emergency medical system. The sharing of trauma facilities made it possible to utilize the special expertise of a very small number of pediatric surgeons who had trauma experience and to incorporate their skills into the broader concept of comprehensive regional trauma centers for children and adults. With further experience we soon realized that such emergency medical services for children's systems should include the following components: A two way communication system, a transport system with special equipment for the management of small children, a training program for first responders at the trauma site, a designated pediatric trauma center, a pediatric intensive care unit at the regional trauma center, a neurology/neurosurgery intermediate care unit at the regional center, a pediatric trauma rehabilitation unit and finally a pediatric trauma longterm rehabilitation and management unit for those with residual disabilities. With the further development of this concept of trauma units for children, pediatric surgeons, general surgeons involved in trauma care and pediatric emergency physicians have offered leadership to expand the emergency medical system for children to include life-threatening illness, as well as injuries. Thus, the organization of regional emergency medical services for children permits the highest quality management of children with life-threatening injuries and illness. This then is the final product: an inclusive, comprehensive emergency medical system for children for all life threatening conditions, both trauma and serious illness.     

Evaluation of pediatric trauma care in Ontario

Three hundred sixty-seven consecutive pediatric trauma deaths which occurred in Ontario between 1985 and 1987 were analyzed from the coroners' records. Injuries were classified as survivable or unsurvivable, and a preventable death rate of 20% was identified. Rural preventable deaths occurred mainly before arrival at hospital, but 55% of urban preventable deaths occurred in hospitals. The causes of death in children with survivable injury suggest that the institution of prehospital resuscitation and improvement in trauma care education for physicians might reduce mortality. The high incidence of unsurvivable injury suggests that injury prevention will be more cost effective in the long term.     

Patterns of injury in children

Trauma is the leading cause of death for children over 1 year of age. This study was undertaken to identify the patterns of injury among children admitted to a regional pediatric trauma center. During a 34-month period, 3,472 injured children were consecutively admitted to a regional pediatric trauma center. Data were collected on medical, etiological, and financial aspects of injury. Eight subgroups were defined by mechanism of injury: motor-vehicle crash occupants, pedestrian and cycle injuries, falls, child abuse, gunshot and stab wounds, burns, poisonings, and foreign body ingestions or aspirations. Analysis of variance, Duncan's multiple range test, and contingency table analysis were used to determine differences among subgroups of children. Blunt and penetrating trauma accounted for 64.3% of all admissions. The mean age of injured children was 5.5 years; 64% of the children were boys. Sixty-seven percent of the children were admitted directly from the scene of injury. One-way analysis of variance yielded significant differences in mean age, mean hospital length of stay (LOS), mean intensive care LOS, mean trauma score, mean injury severity, and mean hospital charges by mechanism of injury (P less than .01). The overall mortality rate was 2.4%. Child abuse, gunshot/stab wounds, and drowning had the highest mortality rates, but injuries to motor-vehicle crash occupants and pedestrians accounted for the greatest number of deaths.     

A needs assessment for regionalization of trauma care in a rural state

Systems of trauma care in urban areas have a demonstrated survival benefit. Little is known of the benefit of trauma system organization in rural areas. We hypothesized that examination of all trauma deaths during a 1-year period would provide opportunities to improve care in our rural state. We used a medical examiner database of trauma deaths occurring during a 1-year period. Five board-certified surgeons analyzed deaths as preventable (P), potentially preventable (PP), and non-preventable (NP) using modified Delphi technique. There were 223 trauma deaths during a 1-year period. Most (63%) died at the scene prior to any medical intervention. Adjudication of the deaths demonstrated 5 P (2%; 95% CI 1-5%), 36 PP (16%; 95% CI 12-27%), and 179 NP (81%; 95% CI 76-86%). Agreement among trauma surgeons was only moderate with a k of 0.46. Suicide accounted for a significant number of the overall trauma deaths at 32 per cent. Rural trauma system design should focus on discovery, as that is where the majority of deaths occur. Suicide is a significant problem in this rural state that should be aggressively targeted with prevention programs.     

Pediatric spinal injury: review of 61 deaths.

Injury to the spinal column and spinal cord occurs relatively infrequently in the pediatric population. The authors present a unique review of 61 pediatric deaths associated with spinal injury. This group represented 28% of the total pediatric spine-injured population and 45% of the total pediatric spinal cord-injured group studied. The ratio of pediatric to adult spinal injury mortality was 2.5:1. Of the 61 children, 54 (89%) died at the accident scene. Thirty patients underwent a complete autopsy, 19 of whom had an Abbreviated Injury Scale Grade 6 injury (maximum score, untreatable). Spinal cord injury was found to be the cause of death in only eight children and was associated with injury to the high cervical cord and cardiorespiratory arrest. These children typically sustained severe multiple trauma. In this population, there appears to be little room for improved outcome through changes in treatment strategy.     

A population-based multivariate analysis of the association of county demographic and medical system factors with per capita pediatric trauma death rates in North Carolina.

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed the association between demographic and medical system factors and the pediatric trauma death rate in North Carolina. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Trauma is the leading cause of death in children. Various medical system factors have been suggested to reduce pediatric morbidity and mortality rates, but the association with these rates has not been tested. METHODS: Data were obtained from the North Carolina medical examiner's database. The dependent variable was the county per capita pediatric trauma death rate. Twenty-one demographic and medical system measures were selected as independent variables. RESULTS: Nine hundred forty-one pediatric trauma deaths from 1986 to 1989 were included in our sample. Multivariate analysis identified the variables most highly associated with the dependent variables. The presence of advanced life support (ALS) training was the only medical system factor associated significantly with pediatric trauma death rates. Trauma centers, emergency (911) telephone access, and other medical resource variables had no significant association. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms other reports showing that demographic factors have an important predictive association with the trauma death rate in children. Advanced life support was the only medical system resource associated significantly with pediatric trauma death rates. This study underlines the significance of pre-hospital care in the treatment of pediatric trauma.     

Pediatric trauma deaths: a three-part analysis from a nonacademic trauma center

A three-part analysis was undertaken to assess pediatric trauma mortality in a nonacademic Level II trauma center at Parkview Hospital in Fort Wayne, Indiana. Part I was a comparison of Parkview trauma registry data collected from 1999 through 2003 with those of pediatric and adult trauma centers in Pennsylvania. The same methodology used in Pennsylvania was used for the initial evaluation of pediatric deaths from trauma in our trauma center. Part II was a formal in-depth analysis of all individual pediatric deaths as well as surgical cases with head, spleen, and liver injuries from the same time frame. Part III proposes a new methodology to calculate a risk-adjusted mortality rate based on the TRISS model for the evaluation of a trauma system. The use of specific mortality and surgical intervention rates was not an accurate reflection of trauma center outcome. The proposed risk-adjusted mortality rate calculation is perhaps an effective outcome measure to assess patient care in a trauma system.     

Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons' position statement on the use of all-terrain vehicles by children and youth

The goal of the Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons is to improve the surgical care of infants and children in Canada. Its areas of interest include all aspects of general and thoracic pediatric surgery with recognition of its unique responsibility to infants born with congenital anomalies and children with malignancies. Although its responsibility to pediatric trauma is not unique, that injury remains the number one cause of death of all children beyond infancy creates a pivotal role of this association in issues related to pediatric trauma. With modern methods of first aid, transportation, resuscitation, intensive care, and specialized surgical team effort, many of these seriously traumatized children can be saved. However, despite these advances in trauma care, it is recognized that the most important and ultimate approach to childhood injuries lies in the realm of prevention.     

Firearm injuries and children: Position statement of the American Pediatric Surgical Association

Firearm injuries are the second most common cause of death in children who come to a trauma center, and pediatric surgeons provide crucial care for these patients. The American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) is committed to comprehensive pediatric trauma readiness, including firearm injury prevention. APSA supports a public health approach to firearm injury, and it supports availability of quality mental health services. APSA endorses policies for universal background checks, restrictions on assault weapons and high capacity magazines, strong child access protection laws, and a minimum purchase age of 21 years. APSA opposes efforts to keep physicians from counseling children and families about firearms. APSA promotes research to address this problem, including increased federal research support and research into the second victim phenomenon. APSA supports school safety and readiness, including bleeding control training. While it may be daunting to try to reduce firearm deaths in children, the U.S. has seen success in reducing motor vehicle deaths through a multidimensional approach – prevention, design, policy, behavior, trauma care. APSA believes that a similar public health approach can succeed to save children from death and injury from firearms. APSA is committed to building partnerships to accomplish this.Type of StudyAPSA Position Statement.Level of EvidenceLevel V, Expert Opinion.     

Pediatric trauma anesthesia

Trauma has a significant impact on pediatric morbidity and mortality. Depending on the emergency medical services and health care system, anesthesiologists may be involved in pediatric trauma care at the scene, in the emergency department, in the operating room, or in the intensive care unit. Familiarity with the pathophysiology of pediatric trauma and age-dependent anatomical and physiological features is, therefore, essential to every anesthesiologist. Fast and appropriate interventions with respect to the clinical status and the suspected injuries are the key to successful treatment. Due to the high incidence of head injury, airway management and hemodynamic stabilization are of utmost importance. For preclinical trauma care, however, evidence-based data showing a gold standard for pediatric trauma care are still lacking.     

Fatal injury: characteristics and prevention of deaths at the scene

BACKGROUND: Almost half of all trauma deaths occur at the scene. It is important to determine if these deaths can be prevented. METHODS: Penetrating or blunt force trauma deaths were identified through the Office of the Medical Examiner during a 2-year period. Data were also obtained through review of these records. RESULTS: There were 312 deaths at the scene that received no medical care. Almost 60% were firearm-related. About 80% of the victims were men, and 55% of these deaths occurred in people between 20 and 49 years old. Suicide accounted for nearly half of these deaths. Eighty percent of these injured people had Abbreviated Injury Scale scores of 5 or 6. CONCLUSION: Almost 60% of deaths at the scene occurred at the same time as injury and reflect severe injury to vital regions of the body. These findings suggest that primary prevention of the initial event causing injury may be more important than definitive prehospital emergency medical care to prevent these deaths.     

Preventable traumatic deaths in children

In order to discern the frequency of preventable traumatic deaths in children, the medical examiners' records of 118 consecutive traumatic deaths (except burns and drownings) in children up to 15 years of age in metropolitan St. Louis were reviewed between 1977 and 1981. Thirty-eight different hospitals were involved in the case of these patients. Where possible, victims were assigned a Modified Injury Severity Score (MISS). Twenty-five percent of the deaths unassociated with neurological damage were deemed preventable. The frequency of preventable deaths and the excessive number of hospitals involved suggests that pediatric surgeons should become involved in the development of regionalized trauma care, lending their expertise to the development of triage and treatment protocols for injured children.     

Windows 99: a source of suburban pediatric trauma

BACKGROUND: Falls from windows in urban areas cause a significant number of pediatric injuries. Window falls have not been well described in the nonurban setting. We describe the epidemiology of window falls from residential homes among pediatric patients at a suburban Level I trauma center. METHODS: A review of patients admitted from January 1991 through November 1999 to a center serving a rapidly growing suburban area was performed. RESULTS: A total of 2,322 children, ages 0-14 years, were admitted during the study period. Falls comprised 41% of these admissions, and 11% of falls were from windows, greater than twice the national average. More than 39% of children who fell from windows were admitted directly to the intensive care unit. Overall mortality rate was 4%. Ages 0 to 4 years comprised the largest percentage (83%), and all children who died were in this age group. Children < or = 4 years were more likely to have an Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 2 (head injury) than those ages 10 to 14 years (p = 0.032). More than 31% of all children injured in window falls seen at the study institution between 1991 and 1999 were admitted in the last 2 years. CONCLUSION: Pediatric falls from windows in this suburban area appear to be increasing, with an incidence greater than the national average. Children at greatest risk are less than 4 years old. Further research in injury prevention at the national level aimed at suburban areas may be warranted.     

Pediatric prehospital trauma care. A retrospective comparison of air and ground transportation

OBJECTIVE: In contrast to prehospital care of adult trauma victims, prehospital care providers have only limited clinical experience of pediatric trauma cases as these are relatively infrequent. Literature reports on prehospital pediatric trauma care given by paramedics are frequently found in the literature, but there are few publications analyzing the quality of prehospital trauma care provided by emergency physicians in the care of injured children. It was the goal of this study to analyze the prehospital care of the pediatric trauma victims transported to a trauma center by physician-staffed ambulances and helicopters. METHODS: The study took the form of a retrospective 5-year review of pediatric trauma patients admitted to a trauma center. The inclusion criteria were age younger than 13 years and a NACA score higher than 3. In all, 104 patients were included, and these were divided into two groups, those transported to hospital by helicopter (RTH, n=87) and those taken to hospital by road ambulance (NEF, n=17). RESULTS: With a mean NACA score of 4.6 and a mean ISS of 15, no significant differences were found between the two groups in either severity of injury or length of hospital stay. The mortality of the total patient population was 15.4%, with no evidence of preventable deaths in patients who were admitted to the trauma center with vital signs. Analysis of prehospital therapy showed no differences in the volume of intravenous fluids administered (RTH 636 ml vs NEF 476 ml) or in the proportion of children with a GCS<9 in whom endotracheal intubation was implemented (RTH 39/44 vs NEF 7/7). Placement of more than one i.v. line and endotracheal intubation were associated with longer times at the scene of the accident before patients were taken to hospital (>one i.v. corresponded to 9 min longer, and endotracheal intubation, to 10 min longer). CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital pediatric trauma care delivered by physician-staffed ambulances or rescue helicopters is associated with a high rate of i.v. line placement (92%) and high intubation rates (90%) in patients with an altered level of consciousness (GCS<9). The prehospital care provided by helicopter or ground ambulance personnel was not different and was not associated with longer stays in the intensive care unit or longer overall stays in hospital. Scene times became longer with increasing number of i.v. line placements and with endotracheal intubation, but was not prolonged by a greater severity of injury as determined by the ISS. Preventable deaths were not observed in the patient population. In summary, owing to the the local infrastructure, pediatric trauma patients are more frequently transported to the trauma center by air (87 by air vs. 17 by road per 5-year time period). However, despite being less frequently involved in the case of pediatric trauma, the quality of care provided by road ambulance staff is similar to that in air ambulances.     

A critical review of urban pediatric trauma

Accidents are the leading single cause of childhood mortality in the United States. While prevention plays a major role in reducing morbidity and mortality, improvement in all aspects of management is a crucial goal. This study was designed to critically evaluate the prevalence and significant features of childhood injuries as experienced at Cook County Children's Hospital, including the transport system utilized. During a 2-year period (1 April 1979 to 31 March 1981) 719 pediatric patients with trauma were admitted to our institution. Forty-six per cent had lacerations, fractures, or wringer injuries serious enough to warrant hospitalization; 35% had isolated head injuries; and 10% had multiple injuries. Gunshot wounds, straddle injuries, and stab wounds formed the bulk of the rest. Forty-one patients were directly admitted to the intensive care unit with serious injuries, half of whom were transferred after initial care (or no care) from an outlying hospital with an average transport time of 4 hours. Four of the transferred patients died within 24 hours and three had serious sequelae. A review of their injuries showed that early, aggressive, and coordinated management would have significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality. There were no deaths and only one serious sequela in the patients brought directly to our institution. A detailed presentation of the direct correlation between improved survival and early initiation of specialized care to these traumatized children is discussed.     

Close to zero preventable in-hospital deaths in pediatric trauma patients – An observational study from a major Scandinavian trauma center

BackgroundIn line with international trends, initial treatment of trauma patients has changed substantially over the last two decades. Although trauma is the leading cause of death and disability in children globally, in-hospital pediatric trauma related mortality is expected to be low in a mature trauma system. To evaluate the performance of a major Scandinavian trauma center we assessed treatment strategies and outcomes in all pediatric trauma patients over a 16-year period.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of all trauma patients under the age of 18 years admitted to a single institution from 1st of January 2003 to 31st of December 2018. Outcomes for two time periods were compared, 2003–2009 (Period 1; P1) and 2010–2018 (Period 2; P2). Deaths were further analyzed for preventability by the institutional trauma Mortality and Morbidity panel.ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 3939 patients. A total of 57 patients died resulting in a crude mortality of 1.4%, nearly one quarter of the study cohort (22.6%) was severely injured (Injury Severity Score > 15) and mortality in this group decreased from 9.7% in P1 to 4.1% in P2 (p<0.001). The main cause of death was brain injury in both periods, and 55 of 57 deaths were deemed non-preventable. The rate of emergency surgical procedures performed in the emergency department (ED) decreased during the study period. None of the 11 ED thoracotomies in non-survivors were performed after 2013.ConclusionA dedicated multidisciplinary trauma service with ongoing quality improvement efforts secured a low in-hospital mortality among severely injured children and a decrease in futile care. Deaths were shown to be almost exclusively non-preventable, pointing to the necessity of prioritizing prevention strategies to further decrease pediatric trauma related mortality.     

The pediatric patient and thoracic trauma

Trauma remains the leading cause of death for children aged 1 to 14 years. Thoracic trauma is seen in 4% to 6% of pediatric patients presenting to pediatric trauma centers and rarely occurs in isolation. The medical and surgical evaluation of children is a challenging task to even the most experienced physician. Effective treatment of the pediatric trauma patient can only be provided if the physician understands the major pitfalls which are common in the pediatric population. The assessment of the pediatric patient is simplified by an understanding of specific anatomic and physiologic differences between children and adults. While noting children are not small adults, the systematic approach taken towards the evaluation of an adult is similar. Sequential evaluation and management of the ABCs by a caregiver familiar with age specific norms is the most important initial consideration. The care of specific injuries is similar to those found in adults but the patient's size limits the physician's options in many cases.     

The tip of the iceberg for child abuse: the critical roles of the pediatric trauma service and its registry

BACKGROUND: The incidence of child abuse is approximately 10% of all children presenting to an emergency department (ED), with a mortality rate less than 1%. By contrast, the characteristics of the subset of abused children presenting to a pediatric trauma service (PTS) is not well defined. METHODS: This study was a retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected information from an urban Level I pediatric trauma registry from 1990 to 2002 (n = 11,919). Child abuse cases and their perpetrators were identified by E-codes. Patterns of injuries were examined by integer International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, and diagnostic model was evaluated by discrimination and goodness-of-fit. RESULTS: A total of 171 cases of child abuse (1.4%) were identified, and the majority were boys (59%, p > 0.05 vs. nonabuse cases). The median age of the abused cohort was younger than 1 year old, and the number of abuse cases did not differ over time (mean, 11 per year.) Abused children present with a higher median Injury Severity Score (10 vs. 4, p < 0.01), more severe injuries of the head and integument, longer hospital lengths of stay (4 vs. 1 day, p < 0.01), and a higher mortality rate (12% vs. 2%, p < 0.01). The following variables emerged with significant association to abuse: fracture of base or vault of skull, contusion of eye, rib fracture, intracranial bleeding, multiple burns, and age. A new Diagnostic Index for Physical Child Abuse was created. CONCLUSION: Significant characteristics of the abused children in this pediatric trauma service include higher Injury Severity Score (especially in the head and integument), requirement for longer lengths of stay, and a nearly 10-times higher risk of death compared with the ED population. The Diagnostic Index for Physical Child Abuse is proposed as a new tool to assist in the identification of child abuse among pediatric trauma patients. An epidemiologic triangle for child abuse is described, with different prevalence and severity of child abuse seen at different levels of our health care system, starting with primary care providers, followed by the ED, the PTS, and ultimately the medical examiners. The number of cases decreases from the bottom to the top of the health care system, but the mortality rate increases as abuse escalates through the triangle. This establishes the PTS as possibly the final gatekeeper before an abused case becomes a fatality. These data emphasize the need for rigorous registry evaluation and subsequent evidence-based prevention initiatives.