A double-blinded, comparative study of the effects of short preseason specific immunotherapy and topical steroids in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma

BACKGROUND: Both specific immunotherapy (SIT) and nasal steroid (NS) have been shown to effectively reduce symptoms of allergic rhinitis. Although a number of investigators have convincingly shown anti-inflammatory effects of both treatments in separate studies, few comparative studies have been performed. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of preseason SIT with a standardized allergen extract and NS in seasonal allergic disease (rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma). METHODS: We examined 41 patients allergic to birch pollen, 21 with rhinoconjunctivitis and 20 with both rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma; they were treated in a randomized, double-blinded comparative study with birch SIT and NS (budesonide 400 microg daily). Bronchial hyperresponsiveness was measured before and during the season. Changes in eosinophil number, eosinophil cationic protein, and eosinophil chemotactic activity (ECA) in peripheral blood were investigated. RESULTS: Symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis increased significantly less in the NS-treated patients than in the SIT-treated patients during the final 2 weeks of the season (P = .03 and P = .04, respectively). Seasonal peak expiratory flow values decreased significantly only in the NS-treated patients (P = .01). In the NS-treated patients, bronchial hyperresponsiveness increased significantly during the season (P = .0001); however, SIT treatment prevented seasonal PC(20) increase in the asthmatic patients. Measurement of blood eosinophils, eosinophil cationic protein, and eosinophil chemotactic activity demonstrated significant seasonal increase only in the NS-treated asthmatic patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment with NS was more effective than short-course preseason SIT in reducing symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis; however, the 2 therapies were equivalent in terms of the need for rescue medication. SIT prevented seasonal increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness, eosinophil number, eosinophil cationic protein, and eosinophil chemotactic activity only in asthmatic patients. The mechanisms underlying bronchial hyperresponsiveness developing during allergen exposure in rhinitis might be different from those operating in asthma.     

The effect of anti-IgE treatment on in vitro leukotriene release in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Binding of allergens with IgE to the IgE receptors on mast cells and basophils results in the release of inflammatory mediators as sulfidoleukotrienes (SLTs), triggering allergic cascades that result in allergic symptoms, such as asthma and rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate whether anti-IgE (Oma-lizumab), a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, in addition to specific immunotherapy (SIT) affects the leukotriene pathway. METHODS: Ninety-two children (age range, 6-17 years) with sensitization to birch and grass pollens and with seasonal allergic rhinitis were included in a phase III, placebo- controlled, multicenter clinical study. All subjects were randomized to one of 4 treatment groups. Two groups subcutaneously received birch SIT and 2 groups received grass SIT for at least 14 weeks before the start of the birch pollen season. After 12 weeks of SIT titration, placebo or anti-IgE was added for 24 weeks. The primary clinical efficacy variable was symptom load (ie, the sum of daily symptom severity score and rescue medication score during pollen season). Blood samples taken at baseline and at the end of study treatment after the grass pollen season were used for separation of leukocytes in this substudy. After in vitro stimulation of the blood cells with grass and birch pollen allergens, SLT release (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4) was quantified by using the ELISA technique. RESULTS: Before the study treatment, SLT release to birch and grass pollen exposure did not differ significantly among the 4 groups. Under treatment with anti-IgE + SIT-grass (n = 23), a lower symptom load occurred during the pollen season compared to placebo + SIT-grass (n = 24, P =.012). The same applied to both groups receiving birch SIT (n = 23 and n = 22, respectively; P =.03). At the end of treatment, the combination of anti-IgE plus grass SIT, as well as anti-IgE plus birch SIT, resulted in significantly lower SLT release after stimulation with the corresponding allergen (416 ng/L [5th-95th percentile, 1-1168] and 207 ng/L [1-860 ng/L], respectively) compared with placebo plus SIT (2490 ng/L [384-6587 ng/L], P =.001; 2489 ng/L [1-5670 ng/L], P =.001). In addition, treatment with anti-IgE was also followed by significantly lower SLT releases to the allergens unrelated to SIT (grass SIT: 300 ng/L [1-2432 ng/L] in response to birch allergen; birch SIT: 1478 ng/L [1-4593 ng/L] in response to grass pollen) in comparison with placebo (grass SIT: 1850 ng/L [1-5499 ng/L], P =.001; birch SIT: 2792 ng/L [154-5839 ng/L], P =.04]. CONCLUSION: Anti-IgE therapy reduces leukotriene release of peripheral leukocytes stimulated with allergen in children with allergic rhinitis undergoing allergen immunotherapy independent of the type of SIT allergen used.     

Upregulation of nasal mucosal eotaxin in patients with allergic rhinitis during grass pollen season: effect of a local glucocorticoid

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is a common disease characterized by infiltration of eosinophils into the nasal mucosa during the periods of symptoms. Among chemokines, which attract cells to the site of inflammation, eotaxin is relatively specific for eosinophils. OBJECTIVE: We examined the influence of grass pollen season on nasal eotaxin expression in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, as well as the effect of a nasal glucocorticoid on this eotaxin expression. METHODS: Nineteen patients with allergic rhinitis received treatment with either nasal beclomethasone (400 microgram/day) or placebo over a grass pollen season. In these patients, nasal biopsies were taken prior to and during the peak of the pollen season and stained immunohistochemically for eotaxin and EG2 + eosinophils. Five healthy subjects served as controls and gave nasal biopsies once prior to the pollen season. RESULTS: Prior to pollen season, there was no significant difference in nasal eotaxin expression between patients with allergic rhinitis and healthy subjects. Grass pollen season induced significant increase in eotaxin expression in placebo-treated (P = 0.04; n = 9) but not in beclomethasone-treated rhinitis patients (P = 0.8; n = 10). During peak grass pollen season, the eotaxin expression in placebo-treated patients was significantly higher compared with healthy subjects outside season (P = 0.03). There was no significant correlation between the expression of eotaxin and the number of EG2 + eosinophils in nasal mucosa. The serum levels of eotaxin in rhinitis patients remained stable over the pollen season. CONCLUSION: Expression of eotaxin in nasal mucosa of grass-pollen allergic rhinitis patients is upregulated during pollen season and treatment with a nasal glucocorticoid protects against this upregulation.     

Effect of anti-immunoglobulin E on nasal inflammation in patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND: Binding of allergens to IgE on mast cells and basophils causes release of inflammatory mediators in nasal secretions. OBJECTIVE: The combined effect of specific immunotherapy (SIT) and omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, on release of eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, IL-6, and IL-8 in nasal secretion was evaluated. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty five children (aged 6-17 years) with a history of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis induced by birch and grass pollen were randomized into four groups: either birch- or grass-pollen SIT in combination with either anti-IgE or placebo. Complete sets of nasal secretion samples before treatment Visit 1 (V1), during birch- (V2) and grass (V3)-pollen season and after the pollen season (V4) were collected from 53 patients. RESULTS: A significant reduction in tryptase only was seen in the anti-IgE-treated group at V2 (P<0.05) and V4 (P<0.05) compared with the placebo group. During the pollen season, patients with placebo showed an increase of ECP compared with baseline (V2: +30.3 microg/L; V3: +134.2 microg/L, P< 0.005; V4: +79.0 microg/L, P< 0.05), and stable levels of tryptase, IL-6 and IL-8. Treatment with anti-IgE resulted in stable ECP values and a significant decrease of tryptase compared with V1 (baseline): V2: -80.0 microg/L (P< 0.05); V3: -56.3 microg/L, which persisted after the pollen season with V4: -71.6 microg/L (P< 0.05). After the pollen season, a decrease of IL-6 was observed in both groups (V4 placebo group: -37.5 ng/L; V4 anti-IgE group: -42.9 ng/L, P< 0.01). CONCLUSION: The combination of SIT and anti-IgE is associated with prevention of nasal ECP increase and decreased tryptase levels in nasal secretions.     

The co-seasonal application of anti-IgE after preseasonal specific immunotherapy decreases ocular and nasal symptom scores and rescue medication use in grass pollen allergic children

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) and treatment with anti-immunoglobulin (Ig)E antibody are complementary approaches to treat allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, which may be used for single or combined treatment. OBJECTIVE: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of single and combined treatment with SIT and anti-IgE (Omalizumab) in reducing symptom severity and rescue medication use. METHODS: A total of 221 subjects with birch and grass pollen allergic rhinoconjunctivitis aged 6-17 years were analysed during the grass pollen season. Group A (SITbirch + placebo) served as a reference group obtaining no effective treatment for grass pollen allergy. Group B received anti-IgE monotherapy during grass pollen season, group C SIT grass pollen monotherapy, and group D the combined treatment of SIT and Omalizumab. RESULTS: Preseasonal treatment with grass pollen SIT alone compared with SIT with the nonrelated allergen did not reduce symptoms or rescue medication use. Anti-IgE monotherapy significantly diminished rescue medication use and number of symptomatic days. The combined treatment with SIT and anti-IgE showed superior efficacy on symptom severity compared with anti-IgE alone. CONCLUSIONS: Co-seasonal Omalizumab therapy showed considerable effects in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis. The combination of SIT plus Omalizumab was clinically superior to each treatment alone during the first year of observation.     

Efficacy of combination treatment with anti-IgE plus specific immunotherapy in polysensitized children and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) and treatment with monoclonal anti-IgE antibody have complementary modes of action. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether combined therapy could provide better efficacy than either treatment alone. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blinded trial to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneously administered anti-IgE (omalizumab) or placebo in children and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis in both a birch pollen season and a grass pollen season (sequential seasons together lasting an average of 84 days). There were 4 treatment arms. Each subject was started on SIT-birch or SIT-grass, and anti-IgE or placebo was started before and maintained during the anticipated pollen seasons (a total of 24 weeks). The primary efficacy variable was symptom load, the sum of daily symptom severity score plus rescue medication use. RESULTS: A total of 221 subjects (intent-to-treat population) aged 6 to 17 years were analyzed for efficacy. Combination therapy reduced symptom load over the 2 pollen seasons by 48% (P <.001) over SIT alone. When analyzed separately by season, the 2 groups receiving unrelated SIT were considered placebo controls. In the grass season, symptom loads were as follows: unrelated (birch) SIT + placebo, 0.89 (reference value); unrelated (birch) SIT + anti-IgE, 0.49 (-45%); SIT-grass + placebo, 0.61 (-32%); SIT-grass + anti-IgE, 0.26 (-71%). CONCLUSION: Anti-IgE therapy conferred a protective effect independent of the type of allergen. Additional clinical benefit was demonstrated in both pollen seasons, whether there was coverage by SIT or not. This combination might prove useful for the treatment of allergic rhinitis, particularly for polysensitized patients.     

Seasonal idiopathic rhinitis with local inflammatory response and specific IgE in absence of systemic response

Background: Patients with idiopathic rhinitis (IR) are considered to be nonallergic because they have a negative skin prick test (SPT) and allergen specific‐IgE in serum. The concept of localized mucosal allergy in the absence of atopy has recently been proposed. The immunological mechanisms involved in seasonal IR have not been sufficiently studied. We examined nasal mucosa inflammation, the presence of nasal specific‐IgE and the response to nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) in patients with seasonal IR who presented symptoms only in spring. Methods: We evaluated 32 patients with seasonal IR and 35 with persistent allergic rhinitis to pollen (PAR‐P) and compared these with healthy controls and persons with PAR to house dust mite during the pollen season, as well as by NAPT out‐of‐season with grass and Olea europea. We measured the nasal leukocyte–lymphocyte phenotype (CD45, CD33, CD16, CD3, CD4 and CD8), eosinophil‐cationic‐protein, and total and specific‐IgE to grass and olive pollen in serum and nasal lavage and performed NAPT. Results: In the IR group, 62.5% had a positive NAPT (IR‐PosNAPT), 20/32 to grass, with four of these having a positive NAPT to olive pollen as well. IR‐PosNAPT patients showed a similar nasal leukocyte–lymphocyte profile to the PAR‐P patients and different to controls. We detected nasal specific‐IgE in 35% of IR‐PosNAPT patients. Conclusions: These results support the hypothesis that a subgroup of patients with IR have seasonal symptoms with evidence of a nasal allergic immune reaction in the absence of a positive SPT or serum specific IgE.     

Specific immunotherapy has long-term preventive effect of seasonal and perennial asthma: 10-year follow-up on the PAT study

BACKGROUND: 3-year subcutaneous specific immunotherapy (SIT) in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis reduced the risk of developing asthma during treatment and 2 years after discontinuation of SIT (5-year follow-up) indicating long-term preventive effect of SIT. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term clinical effect and the preventive effect of developing asthma 7-years after termination of SIT. METHODS: One hundred and forty-seven subjects, aged 16-25 years with grass and/or birch pollen allergy was investigated 10 years after initiation of a 3-year course of SIT with standardized allergen extracts of grass and/or birch or no SIT respectively. Conjunctival provocations were performed outside the season and methacholine bronchial provocations were performed during the season and winter. Asthma was assessed by clinical evaluation. RESULTS: The significant improvements in rhinoconjunctivitis and conjunctival sensitivity persisted at the 10-year follow-up. Significantly less actively treated subjects had developed asthma at 10-year follow-up as evaluated by clinical symptoms [odds ratio 2.5 (1.1-5.9)]. Patients who developed asthma among controls were 24/53 and in the SIT group 16/64. The longitudinal treatment effect when adjusted for bronchial hyper-responsiveness and asthma status at baseline including all observations at 3, 5 and 10 years follow-up (children with or without asthma at baseline, n = 189; 511 observations) was statistically significant (P = 0.0075). The odds ratio for no-asthma was 4.6 95% CI (1.5-13.7) in favor of SIT. CONCLUSION: A 3-year course of SIT with standardized allergen extracts has shown long-term clinical effects and the potential of preventing development of asthma in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis up to 7 years after treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Specific immunotherapy has long-term clinical effects and the potential of preventing development of asthma in children with allergic rhino conjunctivitis up to 7 years after treatment termination.     

Nasal rinsing with hypertonic solution: an adjunctive treatment for pediatric seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND: Recent but limited evidence suggests that nasal lavage with hypertonic saline may be useful as an adjunctive treatment modality in the management of pediatric allergic rhinitis. The aim of this study was to clarify whether nasal irrigation with hypertonic solution should be routinely recommended to children with seasonal grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: Fourty-four children with seasonal grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis were recruited. Twenty-two patients were randomized to receive three-times daily nasal rinsing with hypertonic saline during the pollen season, which lasted 7 weeks. Twenty-two patients were allocated to receive no nasal irrigation and were used as controls. Twenty patients per group completed the study. A mean daily rhinoconjunctivitis score based on the presence of nasal discharge and obstruction as well as ocular symptoms as reddening and itching were calculated for each week of the pollen season. Patients were allowed to use oral antihistamines when required and the mean number of drugs taken per week was also calculated. RESULTS: The mean weekly rhinoconjunctivitis score in the active group was reduced during the whole pollen period. This difference was statistically significant in week 6 and 7 of therapy. A markedly reduced intake of oral antihistamines was also observed in patients allocated to nasal rinsing, being statistically significant in 5 of the 7 weeks. No adverse effect was reported in the active group. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of nasal rinsing with hypertonic saline in the pediatric patient with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. This treatment proved to be tolerable, inexpensive and effective.     

Intramuscular betamethasone dipropionate vs. topical beclomethasone dipropionate and placebo in hay fever

A double-blind, double-dummy comparative study was made of 30 adult birch pollen-allergic outpatients with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis. They were treated with either topically applied beclomethasone dipropionate 100 micrograms in each nostril twice daily for 4 weeks, placebo, or an injection of 2 ml of a suspension containing 5 mg betamethasone dipropionate and 2 mg betamethasone disodium phosphate per ml (Diprospan) immediately prior to the birch pollen season. Placebo- and topical steroid-treated patients experienced an increase in rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms, i.e. nasal blockage, nasal itching, rhinorrhea, sneezing and eye symptoms, and placebo-treated patients used significantly more antihistamine tablets during the pollen season. Diprospan-treated patients experienced fewer symptoms on all measured parameters. We concluded that one injection of Diprospan immediately prior to the birch pollen season produces significantly fewer rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms than does placebo and topical steroid treatment.     

Pollen immunotherapy reduces the development of asthma in children with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis (the PAT-study)

BACKGROUND: Children with allergic rhinitis are likely to develop asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether specific immunotherapy can prevent the development of asthma and reduce bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: From 6 pediatric allergy centers, 205 children aged 6 to 14 years (mean age, 10.7 years) with grass and/or birch pollen allergy but without any other clinically important allergy were randomized either to receive specific immunotherapy for 3 years or to an open control group. All subjects had moderate to severe hay fever symptoms, but at inclusion none reported asthma with need of daily treatment. Symptomatic treatment was limited to loratadine, levocabastine, sodium cromoglycate, and nasal budesonide. Asthma was evaluated clinically and by peak flow. Methacholine bronchial provocation tests were carried out during the season(s) and during the winter. RESULTS: Before the start of immunotherapy, 20% of the children had mild asthma symptoms during the pollen season(s). Among those without asthma, the actively treated children had significantly fewer asthma symptoms after 3 years as evaluated by clinical diagnosis (odds ratio, 2.52; P <.05). Methacholine bronchial provocation test results improved significant in the active group (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy can reduce the development of asthma in children with seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis.     

A follow-up study of immunotherapy-treated birch-allergic patients: effect on the expression of chemokines in the nasal mucosa

Background Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only treatment producing lasting clinical improvement in patients with allergy. We investigated the long‐term effect of SIT treatment on the expression of chemokines: eotaxin, RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) and thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine (TARC), and their receptors CCR3 and CCR4 in biopsies of nasal mucosa from birch‐allergic individuals. Methods Sixteen patients who completed a 3‐year treatment programme 3–5 years ago, and 12 untreated, matched controls were included in the study. Patients recorded symptoms and use of rescue medication before and during the pollen season. Nasal mucosa samples obtained before and during the season were stained for eosinophil and mast cell markers and for eotaxin, RANTES, TARC, CCR3 and CCR4. Results During the pollen season, rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms increased in both SIT and control groups (P=0.001 and 0.002, respectively). However, SIT patients had 37% fewer symptoms than controls. Medication use increased in both groups (P=0.002) during the season but the SIT group used 28% less than the controls (P=0.02). The number of eosinophils in the nasal mucosa increased in the control group (P=0.01) and the difference between the groups was significant during the season (P=0.01). No seasonal increase in the numbers of mast cells was seen, but during the pollen season, more (P=0.02) AA⁺ cells were found in the controls than in the SIT group. The number of eotaxin⁺ and RANTES⁺ cells increased in the control group (P=0.01 and 0.03, respectively) and the difference between groups during the season was significant (P=0.01 and 0.01, respectively). The TARC⁺ cell numbers were lower in the SIT group during the season (P=0.003). The CCR3⁺ cells increased only in the control group during the pollen season and remained unchanged in SIT patients, while CCR4⁺ cell numbers increased in both the control (P=0.03) and SIT (P=0.02) groups. Conclusion This study confirmed that decreased numbers of eosinophils in the nasal mucosa is a long‐lasting effect of birch SIT. SIT also prevented seasonal rises in the number of cells expressing the chemokines eotaxin and RANTES.     

Effect of topical corticosteroids on seasonal increases in epithelial eosinophils and mast cells in allergic rhinitis: a comparison of nasal brush and biopsy methods

BACKGROUND: Nasal brushing and nasal biopsy are well-tolerated sampling techniques. Seasonal grass pollen-induced rhinitis is characterized by epithelial mast cell infiltration and seasonal increases in both epithelial and sub-mucosal eosinophils. OBJECTIVE: To compare the ability of the nasal brush and nasal biopsy techniques to detect natural seasonal increases in eosinophils and mast cells, and to assess the influence of topical corticosteroid. METHODS: Nasal brush samples and nasal biopsies were collected from 46 grass pollen-sensitive seasonal rhinitis patients before the grass pollen season and at the peak of the pollen season following 6 weeks' treatment with either fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (200 microg, twice daily) or placebo nasal spray. RESULTS: Placebo patients showed seasonal increases in epithelial eosinophils both with nasal brushing (P < 0.0001) and biopsy (P < 0.001). Epithelial mast cell numbers also increased during the pollen season as detectable by brushing (P < 0.0001) and biopsy (P < 0.03). Changes in cell numbers measured by nasal brushing correlated with those observed with nasal biopsy, both for eosinophils and mast cells (P < 0.05). Sub-mucosal eosinophils but not mast cells also increased during the pollen season (P < 0.002). Nasal brushing and biopsy revealed that fluticasone treatment inhibited seasonal increases in epithelial eosinophils (P < 0.00001) and epithelial infiltration by mast cells (nasal brushing P < 0.00001 and nasal biopsy P < 0.01). Fluticasone also inhibited seasonal increases in sub-mucosal eosinophils (P < 0.001) and significantly reduced nasal symptoms (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nasal brushing harvests sufficient inflammatory cells from the surface of the nasal mucosa to be used in lieu of nasal biopsies in observation of the effect of drugs on the nasal epithelium.     

Oral Immunotherapy of Children with Rhinoconjunctivitis due to Birch Pollen Allergy A Double Blind Study

Thirty children with rhinoconjunctivitis due to birch pollinosis were treated in a double blind manner for 10 months with enteric-coated capsules containing either a birch pollen preparation (n = 14) with doses up to 1.4 X 10(6) biologic units per day or placebo (n = 16). Compared with the placebo group the actively treated children had less symptoms during the birch pollen season after 3 months of therapy (P = 0.035). Skin prick reactions decreased significantly more in the active group than in the placebo group after 10 months (P = 0.01). Conjunctival sensitivity was lower in the active group than in the placebo group after 3 months of treatment (P = 0.01) but not after 10 months. Compared with the placebo group the treated children more often increased their levels of IgG (P = 0.007) and pre-seasonal IgE (P = 0.001) against birch. There was a seasonal increase of IgE antibody level against birch in the placebo but not in the treatment group (P less than 0.001). None of the treated children developed asthma, compared with five of the untreated children. No general reactions occurred and few side effects were seen during the treatment period. We conclude that in children with birch pollinosis oral immunotherapy with high doses of a biologically potent preparation in enteric-coated capsules is effective, easy to perform, economic and safe.     

The anti-inflammatory effects of omalizumab confirm the central role of IgE in allergic inflammation

Anti-IgE therapy with omalizumab reduces serum levels of free IgE and downregulates expression of IgE receptors (Fc epsilonRI) on mast cells and basophils. In the airways of patients with mild allergic asthma, omalizumab reduces Fc epsilonRI+ and IgE+ cells and causes a profound reduction in tissue eosinophilia, together with reductions in submucosal T-cell and B-cell numbers. In patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis, omalizumab inhibits the allergen-induced seasonal increases in circulating and tissue eosinophils. Omalizumab decreases Fc epsilonRI expression on circulating dendritic cells, which might lead to a reduction in allergen presentation, T(H)2 cell activation, and proliferation. As a systemic anti-IgE agent, omalizumab has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with moderate and severe allergic asthma and in those with seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis, as well as in patients with concomitant allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis. The anti-inflammatory effects of omalizumab at different sites of allergic inflammation and the clinical benefits of anti-IgE therapy in patients with allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis emphasize the fundamental importance of IgE in allergic inflammation.     

Variations in histamine concentration in nasal secretion in patients with allergic rhinitis

The histamine concentration and content in nasal secretion and the volume of nasal secretion in nasal washing samples were measured under different conditions in 28 patients with allergic rhinitis sensitive to birch pollen. The mean histamine concentration was significantly lower after intranasal birch pollen challenge (2.08 micrograms/ml) than in prechallenge samples (6.96 micrograms/ml), and was also significantly lower in untreated patients during the birch pollen season (2.30 micrograms/ml) than off-season (7.18 micrograms/ml). The same relationship was found between the histamine content of the secretion samples obtained on these occasions. The mean secretion volume was greater after than before challenge, but not significantly higher during the season than off-season. A partial reversion of the changes in histamine concentration and content that occurred during the season was observed during intranasal corticosteroid therapy. The concentration and content of histamine in nasal secretion from symptomatic patients after intranasal histamine challenge did not differ significantly from those in asymptomatic subjects before challenge. It was concluded that although the histamine level in nasal secretion can be used as a marker of changes in the severity of allergic rhinitis, it is not ideal for this purpose.     

Cc-chemokine eotaxin as a marker of efficacy of specific immunotherapy in patients with intermittent IgE-mediated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) is believed to be a valuable remedy in several allergic diseases; however, an accurate immunological marker of the efficacy of this treatment method has not been found yet. Cc-chemokine eotaxin, owing to its selective action on eosinophils, seems to play an important role in the pathophysiology of allergic response. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of eotaxin in monitoring of SIT efficacy in patients with IgE-mediated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-two patients with seasonal IgE-mediated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to tree- (birch, n = 42; hazel/alder, n = 14) or grass/cereal- (n = 66) pollen received allergen-specific immunotherapy.Serum eotaxin levels were determined four times in every patient, shortly before immunotherapy (Evaluation 0), immediately after the treatment (Evaluation 1), in the height of pollen season (Evaluation 2) and at least 2 weeks after the pollen season (Evaluation 3). Serum eotaxin levels were simultaneously measured in 59 healthy people from the control group. Changes in serum eotaxin levels were assessed in the healthy and allergic groups. Clinical symptoms of IgE-mediated rhinoconjunctivitis were evaluated and compared with serum eotaxin concentration changes. RESULTS: Mean values of eotaxin concentrations in serum during Evaluations 0-3 did not significantly differ in the healthy subjects and the patients with IgE-mediated rhinoconjunctivitis (P > 0.05). Moreover, no statistically significant differences in the serum eotaxin levels between the visits were observed in the patients who received immunotherapy (P > 0.05); however, immediately after immunotherapy (Evaluation 1) the mean serum level of eotaxin was lowest and closest to the serum eotaxin concentration in the control group at the same visit. No significant correlation between the mean value of the serum eotaxin level in the height of pollen season (r = -0.12, P > 0.05) or mean changes of the eotaxin levels between Evaluations 2 and 1 (r = -0.03, P > 0.05), on the one hand, and the cumulative score of symptoms and drug, on the other, were found. CONCLUSIONS: The results allow to conclude that although eotaxin plays a significant role in the mechanism of antigen-specific immunotherapy, its serum expression remains a poor marker of SIT efficacy.     

Increased expression of lipoxygenase enzymes during pollen season in nasal biopsies of pollen-allergic patients

BACKGROUND: Exposure of patients sensitized to pollen triggers development of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms (SAR). Eicosanoids are a group of arachidonic acid metabolites contributing to the symptoms of SAR. The aim of this study was to investigate seasonal changes in the expression of enzymes of the eicosanoid pathway in the nasal mucosa of patients with SAR. METHODS: Twenty SAR patients allergic to birch or grass and eight healthy subjects were included in the study. Patients registered rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of rescue medication before and during the pollen season. Nasal biopsies were obtained before and around the peak of the season, sectioned and stained using markers for eosinophils, mast cells, T cells and neutrophils. Antibodies against the following enzymes were also used: cyclo-oxygenase (COX-1, COX-2), 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO), 5-lipoxygenase-activating factor (FLAP), LTA4 hydrolase (LTA4h) and LTC4 synthase (LTC4s). RESULTS: During the pollen season symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis and medication score increased significantly (P=0.001; P=0.001 respectively). During the pollen season numbers of eosinophils (P=0.02) and cell positive 5-LO (P=0.02), LTC4s (P=0.04) and LTA4h (P=0.02) increased significantly. During season number of mast cells and cells expressing 5-LO and LTA4h were higher in SAR than in healthy controls group (P=0.02; P=0.01; P=0.03 respectively). CONCLUSION: In sensitized patients exposure to pollen allergen results in increased expression of enzymes of the eicosanoid pathway.     

Effects of topical budesonide and levocabastine on nasal symptoms and plasma exudation responses in seasonal allergic rhinitis

This study compares the effects of two topical nasal treatments for allergic rhinitis, budesonide and levocabastine, on symptom development during seasonal pollen exposure. Additionally, the protective effects of drug treatments on allergen-challenge-induced responses (symptoms and microvascular exudation of plasma) are examined late into the pollen season. Forty-four patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis to birch pollen participated in this single-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. Topical nasal treatment with either levocabastine (200 p.g b.i.d.: n = 16), budesonide (200 μg b.i.d.; n = 16), or placebo (n= 12) was instituted before the start of the pollen season and continued for 5 weeks until the end of the birch pollen season. The participants kept diaries for scores of nasal and ocular symptoms. Nasal allergen challenges with increasing doses of a birch pollen extract (10², 10³ and lC SQ-U) were carried out both before, when patients were asymptomatic and without treatment, and late into the pollen season. A nasal lavage followed each challenge, and the lavage fluid levels of albumin were measured as an index of the acute inflammatory response of the allergic mucosa. The birch pollen season was rather mild, producing only small increases in nasal symptoms. Budesonide treatment reduced the total nasal symptoms compared to placebo (P<0.01) and to levocabastine (P<0.05), while levocabastine treatment did not differ significantly from placebo. Ocular symptoms and use of rescue medication did not differ between placebo and the active treatments. At the end of the pollen season, both treatments reduced allergen-challenge-induced nasal symptoms compared to placebo (P<0.01). Only budesonide reduced allergen-challenge- induced increments of albumin levels in postchallenge nasal lavage fluids (P<0.05, in comparison with placebo). The results suggest that budesonide reduces both seasonal and allergen-challenge-induced nasal symptoms, while levocabastine is effective against allergen-challenge-induced symptoms also during the season. In addition, the topical steroid treatment, but not the antihistamine, inhibits the inflammatory exudation evoked by allergen challenge in patients with active seasonal disease.