Cytomegalovirus disease after prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir in renal transplantation: the importance of HLA-DR matching

This study assessed the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease and associated outcomes after oral ganciclovir prophylaxis in renal transplantation. A retrospective analysis was performed of all adult renal transplant recipients at a single transplant center transplanted between August 16, 1996, and December 31, 2000. CMV disease prophylaxis included ganciclovir 1000 mg orally thrice daily prescribed for 90 d in D-/R+ cases and 180 d in D+/R- and D+/R+ cases. Forty (9.1%) of 470 patients studied were diagnosed with CMV disease, which varied significantly by CMV serostatus and number of HLA-DR matches. The highest incidence of disease, 26.2%, was in D+/R- patients with zero HLA-DR matches. Five-year graft survival was 56.8% with CMV disease compared with 79.1% without (P < 0.001). Five-year graft survival with CMV disease was 75.9% with one or two HLA-DR matches versus 16.2% with zero HLA-DR matches (P < 0.001). CMV remains an important factor in long-term graft survival after oral ganciclovir prophylaxis. However, we have observed that the adverse impact of CMV disease on graft survival is apparent only in patients with zero HLA-DR matches. These results call for the development of new CMV disease prophylaxis and treatment strategies in patients with zero HLA-DR matches. In addition, organ allocation policies discouraging combining CMV-seropositive donors and zero HLA-DR matches may be worth consideration.     

The effect of HLA mismatches, shared cross-reactive antigen groups, and shared HLA-DR antigens on the outcome after pediatric liver transplantation.

The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and HLA-DR mismatching, sharing cross-reactive antigen groups (CREGs), and sharing HLA-DR antigens on the outcome after pediatric liver transplantation. Outcome parameters were graft survival, acute rejection, and portal fibrosis. A distinction was made between full-size (FSLTx) and technical-variant liver transplantation (TVLTx). A total of 136 primary transplants were analyzed. The effect of HLA on the outcome parameters was analyzed by adjusted multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis. HLA mismatches, shared CREGs, and shared HLA-DR antigens affected neither overall graft survival nor survival after FSLTx. Survival after TVLTx was superior in case of 2 mismatches at the HLA-DR locus compared to 0 or 1 mismatch (P = 0.01) and in case of no shared HLA-DR antigen compared to 1 shared HLA-DR antigen (P = 0.004). The incidence of acute rejection was not influenced by HLA. The incidence of portal fibrosis could be analyzed in 62 1-yr biopsies and was higher after TVLTx than FSLTx (P = 0.04). The incidence of portal fibrosis after TVLTx with 0 or 1 mismatch at the HLA-DR locus was 100% compared to 43% with 2 mismatches (P = 0.004). After multivariate analysis, matching for HLA-DR and matching for TVLTx were independent risk factors for portal fibrosis. In conclusion, an overall beneficial effect of HLA matching, sharing CREGs, or sharing HLA-DR antigens was not observed. A negative effect was present for HLA-DR matching and sharing HLA-DR antigens on survival after TVLTx. HLA-DR matching might be associated with portal fibrosis in these grafts.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in seronegative patients treated with prophylaxis: case-controlled study

Primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common in infancy with approximately 90% to 95% of subjects developing antibodies against this virus. CMV seronegative renal allograft recipients generally receive this infection with a graft or with blood transfusions, showing a high morbidity and mortality. Prophylaxis in these patients has shown good results; however, the published studies have included a small number of patients. Our case-controlled study evaluated 163 kidney transplant recipients: 76 seronegatives for CMV and 87 seropositive for CMV as controls. The evaluated parameters were: CMV infection, CMV disease, renal function, and survival of the patient and graft. We studied our experience among CMV seronegative patients treated with various prophylaxis guidelines. Our conclusions were that CMV prophylaxis in seronegative patients was effective because it showed a risk of infection that was equal (or even less) than that in seropositive patients and revealed a delay in the onset of the disease. CMV seronegativity may be a positive prognostic factor for graft survival.     

Cytomegalovirus infection and graft rejection in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and CMV disease have been associated with acute and chronic graft rejection. The introduction of the sensitive CMV antigenemia pp65 assay for detection of CMV infection allowed us to study the time course of CMV infection and acute rejection and the long-term outcome in renal transplant recipients with and without a CMV risk constellation. METHODS: Prospective single center study including 48 renal transplant recipients at risk for CMV infection (donor and/or recipient CMV seropositive) and a control group of 36 CMV seronegative recipients of CMV seronegative kidney donors. Evidence of CMV infection was monitored by the CMV antigenemia pp65 assay every 1 to 2 weeks and compared with the occurrence of acute rejection in the posttransplant period and graft function at 5 years. RESULTS: CMV infection developed in 83% (40/48) of patients of the CMV risk group within 4 months posttransplant. A total of 18 of patients experienced an acute rejection episode (control group 16/36; P=0.65). In 12/18 CMV infection followed rejection and in three patients antigenemia preceded the diagnosis of rejection. In three patients CMV antigenemia remained negative. Five-year follow up: Patient survival (44/48 vs. 31/36; P=0.48), graft survival (38/48 vs. 27/36; P=0.79), number of patients with at least one acute rejection episode: CMV risk group: 42.1%, control group 51% (P=0.46), serum creatinine: CMV risk group:130 +/- 66 micromol/iter, control group: 126 +/- 37 micromol/ liter (P=0.56), proteinuria: CMV risk group: 0.02 +/- 0.02 g/mmol creatinine, control group: 0.02 +/- 0.02 g/mmol creatinine (P=1.0). CONCLUSION: CMV infection within 4 months posttransplant, as defined by a positive antigenemia assay was not found to be a risk factor for acute graft rejection or chronic graft dysfunction at 5 years.     

Cytomegalovirus infection complicating renal transplantation and its relationship to acute transplant glomerulopathy

The incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was established, using laboratory criteria, in 298 patients receiving 362 renal allografts (164/298 = 55%). The incidence of CMV infection did not differ between azathioprine/prednisolone-treated and cyclosporine-treated patients (55% vs. 57% NS). The use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) increased the incidence of CMV infection (78% vs. 51%: P less than 0.01). Donor and recipient CMV status, known for 116 allografts, did not correlate with the incidence of CMV infection (recipient CMV-positive = 50%; recipient CMV-negative = 54%: NS). CMV infection was responsible for 8 patients' deaths (2.7% mortality). Thirty-three patients with acute transplant glomerulopathy were identified (11%). There was no correlation between acute transplant glomerulopathy and CMV infection. Glomerulopathy was associated with poor graft survival (22/33 patients with a graft survival of less than 6 months). Thus CMV infection, although a common complication of renal transplantation with significant morbidity and mortality, is not closely associated with acute transplant glomerulopathy. Further, the lack of correlation of donor-recipient CMV serologic status with graft outcome limits the usefulness of pretransplantation donor screening.     

The influence of HLA A-B-DR matching on cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation. Evidence that HLA-DR7-matched recipients are more susceptible to cytomegalovirus disease.

We examined the prevalence of cytomegalovirus infectious episodes, as defined by clinical, virological, and serological criteria (i.e., CMV disease), in 660 kidney graft recipients; 109 patients (16.5%) developed the disease, and 551 did not. No significant statistical link between CMV disease prevalence and a given HLA-A, -B, or -DR allele was observed. However, patients with HLA-DR7 matched grafts were statistically more frequently found (P < 0.01) in the group of recipients who developed CMV disease as compared with the group who did not develop CMV disease. Furthermore, among patients who developed CMV disease, a significant increase of HLA-DR7 matched over DR7 mismatched patients was noted, whereas no difference between matched and mismatched recipients for the other HLA-DR alleles was found. No difference in the severity of graft failure, often observed during, or immediately after, the CMV episode, was noted between patients matched or mismatched for HLA-DR7. Our data suggest that donor/recipient matching for HLA-DR7 is associated with increased CMV disease.     

Persistent cytomegalovirus infection in kidney allografts is associated with inferior graft function and survival

The long-term effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections on kidney allografts are unknown. We examined the impact of persistent intragraft CMV infection on long-term kidney allograft function and survival. CMV was diagnosed in 82/172 renal transplant recipients by antigenemia test and viral cultures. Biopsies from 48 of 82 patients taken after CMV infection and from 15 patients with no previous CMV infection detected were available for the immunohistochemical demonstration of CMV antigens and DNA hybridization in situ. Five-year follow-up data from these 63 patients were analysed. In 17 patients, CMV antigens and/or DNA persisted in the biopsy >2 months after the last positive finding in blood or urine. Patients with persistent intragraft CMV had reduced graft survival (P = 0.041) and Cox regression analysis showed persistent CMV as a risk factor for reduced graft survival (RR: 3.5). Recipients with persistent intragraft CMV had reduced creatinine clearance 1 and 2 years after transplantation (P = 0.007) and in multivariate logistic regression analyses including several potential pre- and posttransplant risk factors, persistent CMV was an independent risk factor for lower clearance at 1 and 2 years (OR: 4.4 and 4.9). Our novel findings show that persistent intragraft CMV infection was associated with reduced kidney allograft function and survival.     

Hyperimmunoglobulin prophylaxis,monitoring and preemptive ganciclovir treatment eliminate the risk of CMV infection to improve patient and renal allograft survival

Abstract This study was designed to investigate whether the introduction of ganciclovir to clinical use for anti‐CMV treatment changes the risk of CMV infection in renal transplant patients. A total of 1545 cases who had received cadaveric renal transplants were divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 721) was made up of patients who received their transplants within 6 years before the introduction (1991) of ganciclovir and group 2 (n = 824), of individuals transplanted thereafter. Patient and graft survival of CMV D+/R‐ patients was uni‐ and multivariately compared with non‐CMV D+/R‐ patients. In CMV D+/R‐ patients in group 1, survival was significantly lower, and their relative risk for graft loss was 1.32‐fold (P = 0.0483) that of non‐CMV D+/R‐ patients. In group 2 patient and graft survival was identical regardless of whether the patients were at risk for CMV infection or not. The risk of CMV infection can be eliminated by hyperimmunoglobulin prophylaxis, CMV monitoring and preemptive ganciclovir treatment in renal transplant patients.     

CMV Infection in the Donor and Increased Kidney Graft Loss: Impact of Full HLA‐I Mismatch and Posttransplantation CD8+ Cell Reduction

Despite a large body of literature, the impact of chronic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in donor on long‐term graft survival remains unclear, and factors modulating the effect of CMV infection on graft survival are presently unknown. In this retrospective study of 1279 kidney transplant patients, we analyzed long‐term graft survival and evolution of CD8⁺ cell population in donors and recipients by CMV serology and antigenemia status. A positive CMV serology in the donor was an independent risk factor for graft loss, especially among CMV‐positive recipients (R⁺). Antigenemia was not a risk factor for graft loss and kidneys from CMV‐positive donors remained associated with poor graft survival among antigenemia‐free recipients. Detrimental impact of donor's CMV seropositivity on graft survival was restricted to patients with full HLA‐I mismatch, suggesting a role of CD8⁺ cells. In R⁺ patients with positive CMV antigenemia during the first year, CD8⁺ cell count did not increase at 2 years posttransplantation, in contrast to R^? recipients. In addition, marked CD8⁺‐cell decrease was a risk factor of graft failure in these patients. This study identifies HLA‐I full mismatch and a decrease of CD8⁺ cell count at 2 years as important determinants of CMV‐associated graft loss.

     

Positive donor and negative recipient cytomegalovirus status is a detrimental factor for long-term renal allograft survival

Abstract In 524 allogeneic cadaveric kidney transplants, the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor/recipient status on the incidence of CMV infection, CMV disease, early and long-term graft, and patient survival have been analyzed with respect to rejection episodes. Most CMV infections (59%) and diseases (17%) were found in CMV-negative recipients of CMV-positive kidneys. The 1-year function rate of CMV-positive kidneys (75%) dropped about 10% below that of CMV-negative organs (85%), and in the case of CMV-negative recipients an additional graft loss of more than 10% happened within the 4th and 5th years (5-year graft survival pos./neg.: 56%). This detrimental effect was exaggerated if it coincided with antibody-treated rejection episodes.     

Risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection and disease in renal transplant recipients: HLA-DR7 and triple therapy

In a prospective study, an analysis of risk factors for the development of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease was performed on 77 renal allograft recipients. Twenty-five out of the 77 recipients (32%) had a CMV infection. Twenty-two of the recipients received triple immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporin A, prednisolone, and azathioprine) while the remaining 55 received standard therapy (cyclosporin A and prednisolone). In 23 recipients (30%) acute rejection was diagnosed and the first positive parameter of infection occurred 22 days after rejection therapy. Infection occurred in 10 out of 18 HLA-DR7-positive recipients (56%) and in 15 out of 59 HLA-DR7-negative recipients (25%; P< 0.02). In multiple regression analysis, HLA-DR7 was found to be a significant predictor of CMV infection (P< 0.005). CMV disease was diagnosed in only 9 out of 25 recipients with an acute infection. Six recipients (67%) with CMV disease received triple therapy for maintenance immuuosuppression; this was significantly correlated to CMV disease (P< 0.05) as compared to three recipients (33%) with CMV disease maintained with standard therapy. Our data suggest that HLA-DR7-positive recipients are more susceptible to CMV infection and that CMV disease is associated with triple immunosuppressive therapy.     

Improvement in Long-Term Renal Graft Survival due to CMV Prophylaxis with Oral Ganciclovir: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Oral ganciclovir prophylaxis and intravenous preemptive therapy are competitive approaches to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after renal transplantation. This trial compared efficacy, safety and long-term graft outcome in 148 renal graft recipients randomized to ganciclovir prophylaxis (N = 74) or preemptive therapy (N = 74). Hierarchical testing revealed (i) patients with CMV infection had more severe periods of impaired graft function (creatinine clearance_max-min 25.0 ± 14.2 mL/min vs. 18.1 ± 12.5 mL/min for patients without CMV infection; p = 0.02),(ii) prophylaxis reduced CMV infection by 65% (13 vs. 33 patients; p < 0.0001) but (iii) creatinine clearance at 12 months was comparable for both regimes (54.0 ± 24.9 vs. 53.1 ± 23.7 mL/min; p = 0.92). No major safety issues were observed, and patient survival at 12 months was similar in both groups (5 deaths [6.8%] vs. 4 [5.4%], p = 1.0000). Prophylaxis significantly increased long-term graft survival 4 years posttransplant (92.2% vs. 78.3%; p = 0.0425) with a number needed to treat of 7.19. Patients with donor +/recipient + CMV serostatus had the lowest rate of graft loss following prophylaxis (0.0% vs. 26.8%; p = 0.0035). In conclusion, it appears that routine oral prophylaxis may improve long-term graft survival for most renal transplant patients. Preemptive therapy can be considered in low risk patients in combination with adequate CMV monitoring.     

Impact of Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease on Graft Loss After Pancreas Transplantation: A Single-Institution Study in Japan

BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most frequent infections after pancreas transplantation (PTx), and it is unclear whether CMV infection is associated with pancreas graft loss. A limited number of studies about the relationship between CMV infection and pancreas graft loss have been reported from Western countries, but there have been no reports from Japan. This study investigated the relationship between CMV infection and pancreas graft loss after PTx in a single Japanese institution.MethodsThis study included 58 patients who underwent PTx from deceased donors from April 2000 to March 2021 in our institution. We assessed pancreas graft loss based on CMV infection and disease and investigated the causes of graft loss, the time of onset of CMV disease, and the time of graft loss for each case.ResultsThe numbers of patients in the 4 categories of donor (D) and recipient (R) pretransplant anti-CMV antibody status were as follows: 4 (6.9%) in the D−/R− group, 6 (10.3%) in the D−/R+ group, 34 (58.6%) in the D+/R+ group, and 14 (24.1%) in the D+/R− group. Of the 58 patients, 74.1% and 44.1% received diagnoses of CMV infection and disease after PTx, respectively. There were no significant differences in the survival rates of pancreas graft loss stratified by CMV infection (P = .1809) or disease (P = .6241).ConclusionsThis study suggests that CMV infection and disease had no significant influence on pancreas graft loss in this Japanese institution.     

Effect of primary and recurrent cytomegalovirus infections upon graft and patient survival after renal transplantation.

One hundred sixty-four patients were prospectively studied for evidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after renal transplantation to determine the effect of primary and recurrent CMV infection on early graft and patient survival. Primary infections occurred in 62% (21 of 34) of pretransplant seronegative recipients and recurrent infection infection in 93% (121 of 130) of seropositive recipients. Symptomatic infections occurred in 81% (17 of 21) of primarily infected and 31% (37 of 121) of recurrently infected recipients. CMV infections (determined by initial virus excretion) occurred in 86% of the primarily infected and 96% of the recurrently infected symptomatic recipients by the 9th post-transplant week. In contrast, only 53% of nonsymptomatic recipients excrete virus by the 9th week. Primarily infected recipients experienced a significantly lower graft survival at 6 months than uninfected seronegative or recurrently infected patients. However, there was no significant difference in patient or graft survival at 1 year. Recipients who developed recurrent symptomatic infections had a significantly lower graft and patient survival than those recipients who developed nonsymptomatic recurrent infections (P less than 0.0002 patient survival and P less than 0.001 graft survival at 12 months).     

The adverse impact of cytomegalovirus infection on clinical outcome in cyclosporine-prednisone treated renal allograft recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was diagnosed in 28% (n = 144) of 516 renal allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine-prednisone (CsA-Pred) immunosuppressive therapy. The majority of infections produced either asymptomatic (n = 37) or mild-to-moderate (n = 75) clinical disease, while 10% were lethal (n = 14). Transplantation from a seropositive donor to a seronegative recipient was associated with an increased incidence of (CMV) infection but did not predispose to more severe clinical disease. Similarly, donor source (cadaver [CAD] vs. living-related donor [LRD]), age greater than or equal to 45 years, and antecedent pulse steroid therapy for the treatment of acute rejection were not correlated with clinically more severe disease. An increase in serum creatinine to greater than or equal to 25% of preinfection nadir values occurred in association with CMV infection in 106 patients, returning to nadir values or below in 74.5% of these individuals. CMV infection did not impact on actual patient survival among recipients of LRD or CAD allografts or on actual 1-year HLA-haploidentical or HLA-identical LRD graft survival. In contrast, actual 1-year cadaveric graft survival was significantly lower among CMV-infected (n = 95) vs. uninfected (n = 198) patients (75.8% vs. 87.8%, P = .01). In association with the finding of reduced actual 1-year CAD graft survival, CMV-infected patients were found to be more predisposed to develop acute rejection episodes. Of the CMV-infected CAD graft recipients, 48.4% developed greater than or equal to 1 acute rejection episode during the first year following transplantation vs. 25.3% of their uninfected counterparts (P less than .001). The impact of CMV infection in CsA-Pred treated renal transplant recipients does not differ substantially from that reported historically in association with prednisone-azathioprine immunosuppressive therapy.     

Effects of acute cytomegalovirus infection on rat islet allograft survival

Transplantation of pancreatic islets is a promising therapy for the treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus. However, long-term islet graft survival rates are still unsatisfactory low. In this study we investigated the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in islet allograft failure. STZ-diabetic rats received an allogenic islet graft in combination with either an acute CMV infection or control infection. A third group received ganciclovir treatment in addition to the CMV infection. Graft function was assessed by measuring basal blood glucose levels. After sacrifice, the islet grafts were retrieved for analysis of infection and leukocyte infiltration. CMV-infected recipients demonstrated accelerated islet graft failure compared to noninfected controls. CMV infection of the graft was only observed prior to complete graft failure. Quantification of the leukocyte infiltration demonstrated increased CD8(+) T-cell and NK cell infiltration in the CMV-infected grafts compared to the controls. This suggests that CMV infection accelerates immune-mediated graft destruction. Antiviral ganciclovir treatment did not prevent accelerated graft failure, despite effectively decreasing the grade of infection. Our data confirm the recently published CITR data, which state that CMV is an independent risk factor for failure of islet grafts. Also, our data demonstrate that new approaches for preventing virus-induced islet allograft failure may be required.     

Efficacy and Safety of Ultra-Low-Dose Valganciclovir Chemoprophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus Infection in High-Risk Kidney Transplantation Patients

IntroductionValganciclovir (VGCV) prophylaxis of 900 mg twice daily for 6 months is recommended to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, which is a major cause of decreased graft and patient survival in kidney transplant recipients. However, recent studies have shown the efficacy of 900 mg once daily for 3 to 6 months. Maintaining VGCV compliance is difficult because of high drug costs and side effects, such as thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Therefore, we studied the efficacy of ultra-low dose, short-duration VGCV (450 mg every other day for 3 months) in preventing CMV infection in ABO-incompatible (ABOiKT) and deceased donor kidney transplant (DDKT) recipients.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all kidney transplant patients > 18 years old treated at Bong Seng Memorial Hospital from June 2009 to July 2016 who received ultra-low-dose VGCV prophylaxis (450 mg every other day for 3 months). The review included 74 CMV seropositive donor/seropositive recipient (D+/R+) ABOiKT and 78 CMV D+/R+DDKT recipients. The primary outcome was occurrence of CMV infection. Secondary outcomes were graft and patient survival and hematologic side effects.ResultsMean prophylaxis and follow-up were 3 and 98 months, respectively. CMV disease occurrence was significantly higher in DDKT than in ABOiKT (12 cases, 8.1%, vs 1 case, .7%, P < .01). There were no significant differences in patient survival rate, graft survival rate, or hematologic side effects between the groups.ConclusionUltra-low-dose VGCV prophylaxis to prevent CMV infection is effective in ABOiKT, but other treatment protocols are needed for DDKT patients.     

Cytomegalovirus infection: a quantitative prospective study of three hundred twenty consecutive renal transplants

The quantitative effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection on morbidity and mortality rates were examined in 320 renal transplant cases. With the use of virus cultures and CMV antibody measurements, all patients were studied, regardless of symptoms, from a time before transplantation to at least 1 year, 11 months after transplantation for a maximum of 5 years, 9 months. The posttransplant risk factors of CMV infection--patient age, type of donor (living-related or cadaver), antigen match between donor and recipient, presence of diabetes, and the presence of pretransplant CMV antibody--were evaluated for their relative effects on patient survival, graft survival, fever, and leukopenia. CMV infection was a significant risk factor for these four events. CMV infection occurred in 181 patients after transplantation and accounted for 25% of the deaths, 20% of the graft failures, 30% of the occurrences of fever, and 35% of the occurrences of leukopenia. Unexpectedly, female recipients were at higher risk than men for the adverse effects of CMV infection. Young patients and those receiving their second transplant were at higher risk of graft loss if they had associated CMV infection. CMV infection was most reliably predicted by the presence of pretransplant antibody, indicating that reactivation of endogenous virus was responsible for most infections. The presence of pretransplant antibody offered a small amount of protection against fever, but no protection against death, graft failure, or leukopenia. Simultaneous episodes of CMV infection and transplant rejection, both common posttransplant events, most often occurred by chance.     

Mycophenolate mofetil does not modify the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after kidney transplantation but prevents CMV-induced chronic graft dysfunction.

Ganciclovir, which is used to treat cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, has been shown in rodent models to abolish CMV-mediated chronic cellular damage and endothelial cell proliferation; when associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), it has been shown to increase its anti-herpes virus activity. This study tested the hypothesis that kidney graft recipients who received antirejection prophylaxis with MMF and who were treated with ganciclovir for a declared CMV disease could be protected from chronic graft dysfunction. Investigated was the impact of ganciclovir-treated CMV diseases in consecutive first kidney recipients according to their immunosuppressive therapy. The azathioprine (Aza)-treated group (Aza group) included 319 patients. The MMF-treated group (MMF group) included 126 patients. CMV disease was clinically defined and confirmed by virological proof of CMV infection and was treated for at least 14 d with ganciclovir. Despite having the same incidence (21.6% in the Aza group versus 24.6% in the MMF group) and severity, CMV disease was significantly associated with graft loss independent of acute rejection episodes or other factors when tested in a Cox proportional model in the Aza group only (P < 10(-4)). It was shown for the first time that patients whose CMV disease is treated with ganciclovir while they are on MMF therapy are protected from the long-term deleterious consequences of CMV disease on graft survival, independent of acute rejection. It is suggested that the enhanced anti-herpes virus activity of ganciclovir by MMF could contribute to this reported effect, which may represent a significant contribution of MMF efficacy to graft survival.     

HLA-DR matched transfusions: development of donor-specific T- and B-cell antibodies and renal allograft outcome

BACKGROUND: Pretransplant blood transfusions are reported to decrease acute rejection rate and increase graft survival after renal transplantation. This has been attributed to matching for HLA-DR with the transfusion donor, which also results in a lower rate of sensitization. METHODS: The development of donor-specific T- and B-cell antibodies was measured by National Institutes of Health and two-color fluorescence assays after one transfusion in 247 naive patients. Auto-cross-matches were performed to exclude autoantibodies. Patients were grouped according to DR-matching (n=107) or nonmatching (n=140) with the transfusion donor. In 103 renal allograft recipients, acute rejection rate and graft survival were analyzed by Cox regression. RESULTS: T-cell antibodies developed in 6.5% of the patients. There was no difference between the DR-matched and nonmatched group. No auto-antibodies against T-cells developed, whereas one quarter of the sera had a positive B-cell auto-cross-match. There was no difference with regard to B-cell antibodies (auto-antibody-positive sera excluded) between the DR-matched (15.8%) and nonmatched (18.6%) group. Sharing of HLA A and/or B antigens did not result in a lower frequency of donor-directed T- or B-cell antibodies. None of the risk factors, including DR sharing with transfusion donor, contributed significantly towards graft survival (odds ratio for DR sharing: 1.02; 95% confidence interval: 0.45-2.32; P=0.97). DR sharing was no risk factor towards acute rejection either, in contrast to DR mismatch with kidney donor (odds ratio: 2.9), and use of cyclosporine versus tacrolimus (odds ratio: 4.4). CONCLUSIONS: Development of donor-directed T-cell antibodies after one transfusion of leukocyte-poor blood is low and irrespective of HLA-DR match with transfusion donor. B-cell antibodies develop more frequently and independent of HLA-DR match. In 26% of the sera, B-cell auto-antibodies are detected. Rejection rate and graft survival are not significantly different between HLA-DR-matched and nonmatched transfusions.