Survival of cadaveric renal allografts in Hispanic as compared with Caucasian recipients

Evaluation of allograft survival rates revealed a significantly better overall graft survival in Hispanic (n = 66) as compared with Caucasian (n = 38) recipients of primary cadaveric renal transplants. There were no significant differences between the Hispanic and Caucasian cadaveric recipient groups in terms of patient survival, pretransplant transfusion status, immunosuppressive protocols, rejection therapy, mean age, or frequency of diabetes mellitus. Cadaveric donor ethnic origin (i.e., Caucasian or Hispanic) did not significantly alter graft survival rates in either recipient ethnic group. Although Caucasian patients with splenectomies had better cadaveric graft survival than Caucasian graft recipients without splenectomies (P = .02), splenectomy had no significant effect on the renal allograft survival rate in Hispanics. Other factors that were evaluated and found not to correlate significantly with cadaveric graft survival rates were donor recipient HLA matching (A, B, or DR), and panel reactivities of recipient pregraft serum samples. In contrast to the superior cadaveric renal allograft survival in Hispanic as compared with Caucasian recipients, 1-haplotype-matched or 2-haplotype-matched living-related renal allografts had comparable graft survival rates in Caucasian and Hispanic recipients. These results indicate that Hispanics without splenectomy enjoy a cadaveric renal allograft survival rate superior to nonsegregated populations (treated with conventional immunosuppression) reported elsewhere.     

Flow cytometry-detected IgG is not a contraindication to renal transplantation: IgM may be beneficial to outcome

BACKGROUND: At our transplant center, primary recipients of either a haplo-identical (haplo-ID) living related (LRD) or a cadaveric (CAD) donor renal allograft are transplanted after a negative donor-specific IgG anti-human globulin (AHG) cross-match (XM). Testing included the historically highest panel-reactive antibody and the immediate (0-7 days) pretransplant sera. A positive donor specific IgM-AHG XM has not been a contraindication to transplant. Reports suggest that donor-specific flow cytometry cross-matches (FCXM) may be more clinically informative than the AHG-XM. METHODS: We therefore evaluated the impact of a positive FCXM (IgG or IgM) on the rejection frequency (0-12 months after transplant) and 1-year graft survival for cyclosporine-prednisone-treated primary (haplo-ID and CAD) renal allograft recipients. All transplants were performed after a negative donor-specific IgG AHG-XM regardless of the IgM-AHG XM status. RESULTS: Rejection frequencies (26% vs. 31%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (92% vs. 89%, P = NS) were comparable for haplo-ID LRD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. However, IgM-FCXM-positive LRD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (13% vs. 26% P<0.02) and an improved 1-year graft survival (100% vs. 92%, P<0.02) than FCXM-negative LRD recipients. Similar results were observed for primary CAD recipients. Rejection frequencies (40% vs. 44%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (83% vs. 81%, P = NS) were comparable for primary CAD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. Again, IgM-FCXM-positive primary CAD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (22% vs. 40%, P<0.02) and improved 1-year graft survivals (89% vs. 83%, P<0.05) than FCXM-negative recipients. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that, after a negative donor-specific IgG-AHG XM, an IgG-positive FCXM is not a contraindication to transplantation. The presence of IgM may be beneficial in reducing the occurrence of rejection episodes and improving graft survivals.     

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation and living related donor renal transplantation in patients with diabetes: is there a difference in survival?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and living related donor renal transplantation (LRD) in patients with diabetes. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It remains unanswered whether diabetic patients with end-stage renal failure are better served by LRD or SPK. METHODS: Using a longitudinal database, data from all diabetic patients receiving LRD or cadaveric renal transplants or SPKs from January 1986 through January 1996 were analyzed. Patient and graft survival, early graft function, and the cause of patient and graft loss were compared for 43 HLA-identical LRDs, 87 haplotype-identical LRDs, 379 SPKs, and 296 cadaveric renal transplants. RESULTS: The demographic composition of the SPK and LRD groups were similar, but because of less strict selection criteria in the cadaveric transplant group, patients were 10 years older, more patients received dialysis, and patients had been receiving dialysis longer before transplantation. Patient survival was similar for the SPK and LRD groups but was significantly lower for the cadaveric renal transplant group. Similarly, there was no difference in graft survival between SPK and LRD recipients, but it was significantly lower for recipients in the cadaveric renal transplant group. Delayed graft function was significantly more common in the cadaveric renal transplant group. Discharge creatinine, the strongest predictor of patient and graft survival, was highest in the SPK group and lowest in the HLA-identical LRD group. The rate of rejection within the first year was greatest in SPK patients (77%), intermediate in the haplotype-identical LRD and cadaveric transplant groups (57% and 48%, respectively), and lowest (16%) in the HLA-identical LRD group. Cardiovascular disease was the primary cause of death for all groups. Acute rejection, chronic rejection, and death with a functioning graft were the predominant causes of graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there was no difference in patient or graft survival in diabetic patients receiving LRD or SPK transplants. However, graft and patient survival rates in diabetic recipients of cadaveric renal transplants were significantly lower than in the other groups.     

再次肾移植受者和移植肾长期预后影响因素分析

目的探究再次肾移植受者和移植肾存活情况及长期预后影响因素。 方法回顾性分析1991年1月1日至2017年12月31日于浙江大学医学院附属第一医院肾脏病中心接受肾移植受者临床资料。共纳入再次肾移植受者37例,首次肾移植受者5 374例。根据再次肾移植受者移植肾存活时间长短,将其分为长期存活组(19例,>5年)和短期存活组(18例,≤5年)。采用成组t检验比较长期和短期存活组供受者年龄、首次与再次肾移植间隔时间、HLA错配数和再次移植供肾冷/热缺血时间。采用卡方检验比较长期和短期存活组受者性别、再次移植供肾类型、再次移植前后群体反应性抗体阳性比例、首次移植失功移植肾切除比例、再次移植前免疫诱导比例及再次移植后移植肾功能延迟恢复(DGF)和急性排斥反应发生比例。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析再次和首次肾移植受者/移植肾1、5和10年存活率。采用Cox比例风险模型分析影响再次肾移植术后移植肾长期存活影响因素。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果截至2018年3月1日,37例再次肾移植受者中位随访时间为152个月(11～323个月),2例死亡,18例发生移植肾失功,17例移植肾功能稳定。5 374例首次肾移植受者中位随访时间为108.9个月(0.1～350.0个月),459例死亡,1 343例发生移植肾失功。再次移植组受者/移植肾1、5和10年存活率分别为86%/81%、86%/62%和82%/36%,首次移植组受者/移植肾1、5和10年存活率分别为99%/98%、93%/89%和88%/80%。再次移植组移植肾1、5和10年存活率均低于首次移植组(χ²＝60.816、25.110和43.900,P均<0.05);再次移植组受者1年存活率低于首次移植组,差异有统计学意义(χ²＝40.409,P<0.05)。长期和短期存活组受者再次移植后移植肾DGF和急性排斥反应发生比例差异均有统计学意义(χ²＝4.039和4.748,P均<0.05)。Cox回归分析结果示DGF和急性排斥反应是影响再次肾移植受者移植肾长期存活的独立危险因素,差异有统计学意义(RR＝4.317和4.571,P均<0.05)。 结论再次肾移植受者移植肾存活率低于首次肾移植受者,DGF和急性排斥反应是影响再次移植受者移植肾存活的独立危险因素。     

The adverse impact of cytomegalovirus infection on clinical outcome in cyclosporine-prednisone treated renal allograft recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was diagnosed in 28% (n = 144) of 516 renal allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine-prednisone (CsA-Pred) immunosuppressive therapy. The majority of infections produced either asymptomatic (n = 37) or mild-to-moderate (n = 75) clinical disease, while 10% were lethal (n = 14). Transplantation from a seropositive donor to a seronegative recipient was associated with an increased incidence of (CMV) infection but did not predispose to more severe clinical disease. Similarly, donor source (cadaver [CAD] vs. living-related donor [LRD]), age greater than or equal to 45 years, and antecedent pulse steroid therapy for the treatment of acute rejection were not correlated with clinically more severe disease. An increase in serum creatinine to greater than or equal to 25% of preinfection nadir values occurred in association with CMV infection in 106 patients, returning to nadir values or below in 74.5% of these individuals. CMV infection did not impact on actual patient survival among recipients of LRD or CAD allografts or on actual 1-year HLA-haploidentical or HLA-identical LRD graft survival. In contrast, actual 1-year cadaveric graft survival was significantly lower among CMV-infected (n = 95) vs. uninfected (n = 198) patients (75.8% vs. 87.8%, P = .01). In association with the finding of reduced actual 1-year CAD graft survival, CMV-infected patients were found to be more predisposed to develop acute rejection episodes. Of the CMV-infected CAD graft recipients, 48.4% developed greater than or equal to 1 acute rejection episode during the first year following transplantation vs. 25.3% of their uninfected counterparts (P less than .001). The impact of CMV infection in CsA-Pred treated renal transplant recipients does not differ substantially from that reported historically in association with prednisone-azathioprine immunosuppressive therapy.     

Pretreatment of renal allograft recipients with immunosuppression and donor-specific blood

The induction of immunologic unresponsiveness to improve renal allograft survival was attempted in 64 patients by the pretransplant administration of donor-specific whole blood or buffy coat in conjunction with continuous azathioprine immunosuppression. All donor/recipient combinations were at least one-haplotype-disparate. Presensitization, defined as a positive Amos or antiglobulin crossmatch or a high-titer (greater than 1:8) B-cell-positive crossmatch, was present in 6 patients and not present in 58 patients. Attempts at desensitization of the already sensitized group were uniformly unsuccessful. Treatment of the 58 nonpresensitized patients resulted in transient sensitization in 2 patients, permanent sensitization in 1 patient, and no evidence of sensitization in 55 patients. Fifty-three patients underwent renal transplantation from the specific blood donor, and only two have experienced renal allograft rejection loss during a mean follow-up period of 22 months (5-45 months); 57% have never experienced a rejection episode. The two-year renal allograft survival rate was 85%. This is significantly (P less than 0.01) better than our historical experience of 64% with one-haplotype living-related transplants. The low rate of sensitization (5%) has permitted almost all patients to undergo eventual renal transplantation from the specific blood donor. This and the low rate of rejection (4%) argues for a modification of the immunologic response, rather than a selecting-out process as the mechanism for improved allograft survival.     

The transmission of donor-derived malignant melanoma to a renal allograft recipient

The transmission to organ transplant recipients of donor origin malignancy in the allograft has been described. Here we report the transmission of malignant melanoma in a renal allograft transplanted from a multiorgan donor. The lung transplant recipient presented with an allograft lesion that was proven to be melanoma and of donor-origin based on human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR typing. One renal allograft recipient was undergoing his second deceased donor renal transplant, having lost his first graft from recurrent IgA nephropathy. He was unsensitized and immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisolone. He achieved stable graft function and there were no episodes of rejection. Four and a half months post-transplant a diagnosis of donor origin melanoma in the lung recipient was made and his immunosuppression was stopped. He presented with clinical rejection two wk later and a transplant nephrectomy was undertaken. Histology demonstrated vascular and cellular rejection and there was a 3-mm melanoma deposit with no evidence of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes. Three years post-transplant he remained clinically well with no evidence of melanoma and received his third deceased donor renal transplant. This was complicated by cellular rejection in the first week treated with methylprednisolone and vascular rejection at day 10 treated with anti-thymocyte globulin. Three months post-transplant he has achieved good allograft function and remains well with no evidence clinically or on imaging of metastatic melanoma. The other renal allograft recipient was receiving his first deceased donor transplant, having end-stage renal failure of uncertain aetiology. His immunosuppression was not stopped until melanoma was proven in the renal allograft pair six months post-transplant and he then presented with clinical rejection six wk later. Transplant nephrectomy was undertaken and histology did not demonstrate melanoma, but severe vascular and cellular rejection was evident. At three-yr post-transplant he remains disease free clinically and on imaging. At present, the cardiac allograft recipient has no evidence of transmitted melanoma. The highest risk of transmission of donor origin melanoma appears to be from donors who are older and have died from an intracerebral haemorrhage. It is likely these donors have metastatic melanoma and their intracerebral haemorrhage is not primary but has occurred in an unrecognized metastatic cerebral deposit. While the occurrence of donor-transmitted malignancy is not common, the outcome is often fatal.     

The use of cyclosporine in living-related renal transplantation. Donor-specific hyporesponsiveness and steroid withdrawal

Fourteen HLA-identical (HLA-ID) and 62 haploidentical (HP-ID) living-related donor (LRD) renal allograft recipients were transplanted using cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone immunosuppression. No patients were preconditioned with pretransplant blood transfusions (third-party or donor-specific)--and, therefore, none were sensitized to their donor. Patient 93% (13/14) and graft 93% (13/14) survival for the HLA-ID patients is not significantly different (P greater than .1) compared with patient 98% (61/62) and graft 91% (56/62) survival in the HP-ID patients, with a mean follow-up of 16.3 (8-30) and 14.7 (2-35) months, respectively. A significant difference was noted in the incidence of treated rejection episodes (0% vs. 31%, P less than .01) and the mean serum (mg/dl) creatinine (1.37 vs. 1.71, P less than .05) at 18 months between the HLA-ID and the HP-ID and HP-ID recipients, respectively. Ten of 22 HP-ID recipients demonstrated donor-specific mixed lymphocyte culture hyporesponsiveness one year posttransplant that may have been due to the emergence of monocytoid suppressor cells. Nine of these HP-ID and seven HLA-ID recipients were subjected to a protocol of steroid withdrawal. Eleven of these patients are currently on CsA monodrug therapy and two are on alternate-day steroids from 9-18 months after discontinuation of prednisone. These findings suggest that CsA is an effective steroid-sparing agent in LRD renal transplantation that diminishes the frequency of treated rejection episodes and may permit monodrug therapy in selected individuals.     

Short‐term kidney transplant outcomes among African American recipients do not predict long‐term outcomes: donor pair analysis

Keith D, Patrie JT. Short‐term kidney transplant outcomes among African‐American recipients do not predict long‐term outcomes: donor pair analysis.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 69–76. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: African American (AA) renal transplant recipients have poorer graft survival compared to other racial and ethic groups. This study was undertaken to determine whether pre‐transplant factors and events occurring in the first six months post‐transplant were predictive of the poorer long‐term outcomes in AA recipients. To control for kidney quality, a paired analysis of deceased donor kidneys in which one donor kidney was transplanted into an adult AA recipient and the other was transplanted into an adult Caucasian was undertaken. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to determine the impact of outcome variables at six months. Outcomes at six months among the paired recipients were very similar for graft and patient survival, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Less than 10% of difference in long‐term outcomes was explained by differences in the pre‐transplant covariates and events in the first six months. Causes of graft failure after six months revealed a two to three times higher rate of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and late acute rejection among AA. In conclusion, early outcomes after kidney transplant did not predict the poor long‐term graft survival among AA, and AA recipients appear to be more prone to graft loss because of CAN and late acute rejection.     

Excess risk of renal allograft loss associated with cigarette smoking.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking contributes to a number of health-related problems, but its impact on renal transplant survival beyond accelerated patient death is unclear. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of 645 adult renal allograft recipients from 1985 to 1995 to evaluate the relationship between smoking and graft outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of recipients (156/645) were smokers at the time of transplant evaluation. Of these, 90% continued to smoke after transplantation. Pretransplant smoking was significantly associated with reduced overall graft and death-censored graft survival. Patients who were smokers at the time of pretransplant evaluation had kidney graft survival of 84%, 65%, and 48% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, compared with graft survival in nonsmokers of 88%, 78%, and 62% (P=0.007). Pretransplant smoking adversely affected death-censored graft survival in recipients of cadaveric (P=0.02) and of living donor kidneys (P=0.02). Reduced graft survival in pretransplant smokers could not be accounted for by differences in rejection (64% vs. 61%, P=0.35). In a multivariate analysis, pretransplant smoking was associated with a relative risk of 2.3 for graft loss. Among patients with a smoking history before transplantation, death-censored graft survival was significantly higher for those who quit smoking before transplant evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoking before kidney transplantation contributes significantly to allograft loss. The effect of smoking on graft outcome is not explained by increases in rejection or patient death. Smoking cessation before renal transplantation has beneficial effects on graft survival. These effects should be emphasized to patients with end-stage renal disease who are considering renal transplantation.     

Kidney transplantation by use of splenectomy and transfusions, cadaver haplotype matching, suppressor cell assays, and T-cell monitoring

We attempted to modulate several determinants of the host immunologic profile to improve kidney transplant survival: (1) genotype matching of the cadaver donor with the recipient, (2) assessment in recipients of living related donors (LRD) for predisposition to generate suppressor cells in mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC), (3) pretransplant splenectomy and transfusions, and (4) posttransplant immunologic monitoring. Between January, 1979, and July, 1980, 48 primary renal transplants were performed and followed up between 6 and 24 months. Pretransplant splenectomy was performed, and transfusions were administered in 38 of 48 and 48 of 48 patients, respectively. Donors and recipients of 10 of 11 cadaveric transplants were genotyped and selected for one HLA haplotype identity. All 10 proved to also be one DR antigen matches. There were no cadaveric kidney losses, but one surgical antibody to T cell subtest were used to modulate rejection therapy. The LRD group (n = 37) included 13 HLA-identical, seven haploidentical low MLC reactors, and 17 haploidentical high MLC reactors. Three deaths occurred (diabetes and myocardial infarction, stroke, and pancreatitis). A three-component coculture assay was used in the LRD group before transplantation to determine the capacity to generate specific and nonspecific MLC suppressor cells. Suppressor cells were seen in 17 patients given standard immunosuppression postoperatively without rejection episodes. However, in 20 patients incapable of generating suppressor cells, seven biopsy-proved rejection episodes occurred. There were no kidney losses, with 44 of 48 surviving recipients demonstrating normal renal function.     

The effect of cyclosporine on early graft function in human renal transplantation

The effect of cyclosporine and steroids on early renal allograft function and eventual graft outcome was analyzed in 100 recipients; 33 recipients of living related donor (LRD) and 67 recipients of cadaveric donor (CAD) allografts were studied. A concurrent population of 47 CAD recipients treated with azathioprine and steroids was used for comparison. Recipients received oral cyclosporine (14 mg/kg) 48 hours (LRD) or 6-12 hours (CAD) pretransplant. No cases of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) were observed in the LRD recipients. The incidence of posttransplant ATN was similar in the cyclosporine-treated (41%) and in the azathioprine-treated (45%) CAD recipients (P = ns). Cyclosporine-treated CAD kidneys preserved less than 24 hr experienced a lower rate of ATN (P less than .01) using simple cold storage (31%), as compared with hypothermic pulsatile perfusion (57%). One-month creatinine nadirs were higher in cyclosporine-treated than in azathioprine-treated recipients, using median values for each group. One-year actuarial patient survival for cyclosporine-treated LRD recipients was 97%; CAD recipients, 94%, and azathioprine-treated CAD recipients, 91%. Graft survival rates in the same groups were 91%, 76%, and 55%, respectively. The major causes of graft loss in cyclosporine-treated patients were nonimmunologic. It is concluded that cyclosporine and prednisone are a safe, efficacious combination for LRD and CAD renal transplantation. The possibility of nephrotoxicity leading to impaired graft function in the early posttransplant period should not preclude the administration of cyclosporine prior to alloantigen presentation.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy uniformly affects recipients of cadaveric,nonidentical living-related,and living-unrelated grafts

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains a major barrier to long-term allograft survival. The authors retrospectively compared the development of CAN in recipients of cadaveric (CAD), living-related donor (LRD), and living-unrelated donor (LURD) transplants at their center. METHODS: The authors retrospectively examined the impact of various factors on the incidence of CAN using univariate and multivariate proportional hazards analysis in a single-center kidney transplant population. RESULTS: Between 1 January 1990 and 31 May 2000, 2,140 kidney-alone transplants were performed at the authors' center. The overall 5-year incidence of biopsy-proven CAN was 12.2% (n=203). Risk factors for CAN included the number of transplants (P=0.0001), acute rejection (P=0.0001), panel reactive antibody (P=0.0001), discharge creatinine (P=0.0001), 1-year creatinine (P=0.0015), delayed graft function (P=0.007), total human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B and -DR mismatches (P=0.0005), recipient age (P=0.003), black donor race (P=0.001), black recipient race (0.0457), donor age (P=0.0053), cold storage time (P=0.019), and cytomegalovirus infections (P=0.002). Interestingly, although the LRD HLA-identical recipients had a significantly lower incidence of CAN (P=0.0015), the incidence of CAN in CAD and HLA-nonidentical LRD recipients did not differ. Graft survival was significantly worse in CAD recipients compared with all other groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the importance of immunologic and nonimmunologic factors on the development of CAN. The disparities in overall graft survival, despite the similarities in CAN rates, suggests that other factors, in addition to CAN, influence the increase in graft loss in CAD transplant recipients.     

Failure of ganciclovir prophylaxis to completely eradicate CMV disease in renal transplant recipients treated with intense anti-rejection immunotherapy

Ganciclovir prophylactic regimens have been shown to be effective in renal transplant recipients at risk for primary (donor seropositive/recipient seronegative) and secondary (recipient seropositive) cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. However, in addition to serologic factors, the type and intensity of the administered immunosuppression is a strong risk factor for CMV disease. Since January 1995, we have utilized a potent immunosuppressive protocol selectively in recipients at high risk for immunologic graft loss, defined as retransplant recipients, recipients with delayed graft function, non-Caucasian recipients, and recipients suffering from acute rejection. Between January 1995 and December 1996, 110 consecutive renal transplants were performed in recipients who were either CMV seropositive or received an allograft from a CMV-seropositive donor. All recipients received ganciclovir prophylactic therapy for 3 months post-transplant. Group I (N = 43) consisted of recipients at high-immunologic risk for graft loss as defined above. These recipients were treated with an intense anti-rejection immunotherapeutic regimen consisting of Cellcept, Neoral, and prednisone, with the frequent addition of antilymphocyte antibody therapies and intravenous methylprednisolone. The remaining 67 recipients (group II) were treated with a less intense immunotherapeutic regimen consisting of azathioprine, Neoral, and prednisone. The incidence and severity of CMV disease and the patient and allograft survival were compared. The incidence of CMV syndrome was greater in group I (28%) compared with group II (7%), and was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The 1-yr patient and graft survival were similar, 95 and 91%, respectively, for group I compared with 97 and 97%, respectively, for group II. These data suggest that 3 months of ganciclovir prophylactic therapy is significantly less effective for the prevention of CMV disease in renal transplant recipients at high risk for acute rejection treated with an intense immunotherapeutic regimen. These data suggest that more effective prevention of CMV disease in these high-risk recipients will require the addition of other anti-viral agents, such as immunoglobulin preparation to the prophylactic regimen.     

Comparable renal graft survival in African-American and Caucasian recipients

In past years, many pediatric transplant centers found African-American renal transplant recipients to have poor graft survival. Since 1991 anti-lymphocyte induction therapy has been routinely used for pediatric cadaveric (CAD) and living-related donor (LRD) renal allograft recipients at the University of Tennessee, Memphis. Sixteen African-American first renal allograft recipients received induction therapy: 11 CAD allografts (10 OKT3, 1 ATGAM) and five LRD (all ATGAM). Sixteen Caucasian recipients received induction therapy; 3 CAD (all OKT3), 1 living-unrelated donor (OKT3), and 12 LRD (9 ATGAM, 3 OKT3). Mean age at renal transplantation was 11.8 and 10.5 years for African-American and Caucasian recipients, respectively. Predicted graft survival (PGS) estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method for the African-American patients was 94% at both 1 and 3 years, and for Caucasian patients was 94% and 85% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Eleven African-American CAD recipients had a PGS of 91% at 1 and 3 years. Renal allograft survival for African-American and Caucasian pediatric recipients at our center appears to be comparable. This could be due, in part, to the use of anti-lymphocyte induction therapy. However, other factors, such as improved compliance or better immunological and pharmacological monitoring, may also have contributed. Received April 18, 1997; received in revised form January 14, 1998; accepted January 19, 1998     

A retrospective flow cytometric crossmatch study in transplant recipients with autoreactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies

Abstract Our previous data shows renal transplant recipients with autoreactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies to have a reduced transplant survival when compared to patients without autoantibodies. This could have been due to the presence of weak IgG antibodies inhibited by the dithiothreitol used to remove IgM antibodies in the pretransplant cytotoxicity cross-match. That possibility was investigated in a retrospective study of 52 recipients of 57 renal transplants who were recrossmatched using a more sensitive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) to detect recipient IgG antibodies to donor T and/or B cell splenic lymphocytes. Fourteen of the 57 (24%) transplants failed. Six losses were within the 1st month posttransplant and four of these were immunological failures. None of the transplant failures had a positive pretransplant FCXM. These results showed that the recipients with autoantibodies did not have pretransplant IgG anti-donor antibodies. The transplant failures did not, therefore, relate to the presence of antibodies undetected by the dithiothreitol-treated cytotoxicity crossmatch.     

The effect of cyclosporine on mortality and renal function in living related pediatric kidney transplant recipients

The outcome, incidence of acute rejection episodes, complications and cyclosporine (CyA) induced nephrotoxicity were studied in 10 pediatric kidney transplant recipients who were grafted from one-haplotype indentical parent with immunosuppression of CyA and prednisolone (Pred). Excellent patient and graft survival could be achieved in this population with low incidences of acute rejection or serious complications as when compared with the results of azathioprine (AZ) treated pediatric patients. With a mean follow-up of 12.9 months (range 1 to 50 months), the patient survival rate was 100 per cent and the graft survival rate was 100, 84, 84 and 84 per cent at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years post transplantation, respectively. Serum creatinine levels in the group were 0.97, 1.17, 1.14 and 1.2 mg/dl at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post transplantation, respectively. The incidence of treated acute rejection episodes was 20 per cent (2 out of 10) in the CyA-treated children, whereas it was 53 per cent (9 of 17) in the Az-treated children. Five children who had undergone transplant surgery before they were 11 years old displayed linear growth in height after their transplantation. There have been no opportunistic infections, aseptic necrosis or peptic ulcers in this group and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity has not been a serious problem in the pediatric recipients. Only 10 per cent (1 out of 10) of the recipients displayed acute nephrotoxicity and only one recipient has converted from CyA+Pred to CyA+AZ+Pred (Three drug therapy) due to persistent nephrotoxicity. Cyclosporine and prednisolone have therefore constituted a relatively safe, effective immunosuppressive regimen for pediatric renal allograft recipients. This paper was presented at the 7th international congress of pediatric nephrology.     

Cytomegalovirus infection: a quantitative prospective study of three hundred twenty consecutive renal transplants

The quantitative effects of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection on morbidity and mortality rates were examined in 320 renal transplant cases. With the use of virus cultures and CMV antibody measurements, all patients were studied, regardless of symptoms, from a time before transplantation to at least 1 year, 11 months after transplantation for a maximum of 5 years, 9 months. The posttransplant risk factors of CMV infection--patient age, type of donor (living-related or cadaver), antigen match between donor and recipient, presence of diabetes, and the presence of pretransplant CMV antibody--were evaluated for their relative effects on patient survival, graft survival, fever, and leukopenia. CMV infection was a significant risk factor for these four events. CMV infection occurred in 181 patients after transplantation and accounted for 25% of the deaths, 20% of the graft failures, 30% of the occurrences of fever, and 35% of the occurrences of leukopenia. Unexpectedly, female recipients were at higher risk than men for the adverse effects of CMV infection. Young patients and those receiving their second transplant were at higher risk of graft loss if they had associated CMV infection. CMV infection was most reliably predicted by the presence of pretransplant antibody, indicating that reactivation of endogenous virus was responsible for most infections. The presence of pretransplant antibody offered a small amount of protection against fever, but no protection against death, graft failure, or leukopenia. Simultaneous episodes of CMV infection and transplant rejection, both common posttransplant events, most often occurred by chance.     

Immune Regulation and Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients Are Both Enhanced by Human Leukocyte Antigen Matching

We hypothesized that donor/recipient sharing of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) involved in allopeptide presentation to the T regulatory cell increases the incidence of immune regulation, thus contributing to long-term graft survival. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained from 40 living related donor (LRD) and 31 cadaver renal transplant recipients. The trans vivo delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) assay was used to assign patients to regulator, nonregulator, and sensitized categories. In a large cohort (n=1934 patients), primary graft survival and rejection episodes were analyzed using a log rank test for comparison with the DTH results. The highest incidence of regulated anti-donor DTH was observed in the LRD HLA-identical group (6/6; 100%) followed by the LRD HLA 1 haplotype matched group (18/27; 67%). Within the cadaver population, two DR-matched recipients had a higher frequency of regulated anti-donor DTH (6/11; 55%) than 1 & 0 DR-matched recipients (3/18; 17%). In a multivariate model, matching for HLA-DR alone, or for DR plus DQ was significantly (p=0.045, p=0.041) correlated with DTH regulation. The better HLA-matched groups showed the highest incidence of DTH regulation and, in a larger retrospective analysis, displayed better graft survival and freedom from acute rejection (p<0.0001). HLA matching, and HLA-DR matching in particular, correlates with the incidence of immune regulation after kidney transplantation.     

Graft thrombosis in pediatric renal transplant recipients. A report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study

Data from the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study were analyzed to determine the incidence and possible causes of graft thrombosis in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Between January 1987, and November 1989, 1045 renal transplants in recipients less than 18 years of age were registered in the study, including 484 living-related donor and 561 cadaver donor transplants. There were 213 graft failures (67 LRD, 146 CAD), and of these 27 were caused by thrombosis (8 LRD, 19 CAD). Thrombosis occurred in 2.6% of all transplants and accounted for 22.5% (27/120) of all graft failures that occurred in the first 60 days following transplantation. Among the LRD recipients, there were 24 graft failures in those less than 6 years of age, and 7 of these were due to thrombosis, compared to 1 thrombosis in 43 graft losses in recipients greater than 6 years (P less than 0.01). In recipients less than 6 years old, the thrombosis rate for those who received transplants without prior dialysis was 4/32 (12.5%) versus 3/109 (2.8%) with prior dialysis. Among the CAD recipients, age of the recipient did not influence graft thrombosis. Donor age, however, was strongly associated with the risk of thrombosis, as was cold storage time. Donor age and cold storage time were not independently distributed within the population, with longer cold storage times required for younger donors. Both factors, however, independently affected outcome. Other factors, including prior nephrectomy, prior transplant, center size, and use of cyclosporine were not associated with increased risk of thrombosis in LRD or CAD recipients. We conclude that graft thrombosis is an important cause of renal graft loss in children. In LRD transplants the risk of graft thrombosis is increased in recipients less than 6 years old, and preliminary data suggest that the lack of prior dialysis may be associated with thrombotic risk in these patients. CAD transplant recipients who receive grafts from young donors, particularly those with long cold storage time, are at increased risk for graft failure due to thrombosis.