Studies on desglycinamide arginine vasopressin and scopolamine in a modified/lever-touch autoshaping model of learning/memory in rats

Vasopressin administration has been reported to improve acquisition and retard extinction of both conditioned avoidance and food-reinforced behavioral tasks. In the present experiment the effects of a vasopressin analog (DGAVP) and scopolamine (SCOP) were tested in an autoshaped lever-touch model of learning and memory. Rats were food-deprived to 80% of original body weights and tested in modular cages which contained a retractable lever that was presented on a random interval 48 sec schedule. The lever retracted after 15 sec or when it was touched, at which time one 45 mg food pellet was delivered. Subcutaneous injection of 10 micrograms/kg DGAVP 1 hr prior to acquisition and extinction sessions did not alter responding compared to saline controls. DGAVP at doses of 10, 20, and 30 micrograms/kg also failed to affect responding in a more difficult task which included an 8 sec delay between lever retraction and reinforcement. Homozygous Brattleboro rats, which are deficient in vasopressin, did not differ from normal heterozygous littermates in the acquisition of the lever-touch response. Intraperitoneal injection of SCOP (0.1-0.8 mg/kg) 30 min prior to testing caused a dose-related impairment of acquisition compared to saline controls, but did not alter responding in animals which had previously acquired the lever-touch response. These data suggest that manipulations of vasopressin do not affect, while SCOP impairs, the acquisition of a positively reinforced lever-touch response in rats.     

Further characterization of adjunctive behavior generated by schedules of cocaine self-administration

Rhesus monkeys (n = 5), surgically implanted with double-lumen catheters, were allowed to self-administer cocaine (0.1 or 0.3mg/kg/injection, i.v.) on one lever (COC lever) under several fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. Responding on a second lever (SAL lever) delivered saline (i.v.) under a fixed-ratio 1 schedule. Responding on both levers was a bitonic function of interval value and cocaine dose. A variety of experimental conditions were examined to determine whether SAL lever responding could be considered to be adjunctive in nature. SAL lever responding did not change when saline injections were discontinued, suggesting that SAL lever responding was not maintained by interoceptive stimuli associated with the injection. Discontinuation of various exteroceptive stimulus changes that had occurred as a consequence of SAL lever responding also did not affect the frequency of SAL lever responding. However, when there was no stimulus change following a SAL response, response rates on that lever decreased by approximately 40-60% indicating that stimulus change played some role in the maintenance of the behavior. The introduction of change-over-delays (2-16 s) between responding on the SAL and COC levers had little or no effect on responding on the SAL lever, suggesting that SAL lever responding was not maintained by adventitious reinforcement by cocaine injections. SAL lever responding also occurred in these same monkeys when cocaine was available under fixed-time or variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. These results confirm that presentation of cocaine under interval schedules of reinforcement can generate substantial amounts of behavior (pressing the SAL lever) that is not necessary for obtaining the drug. Further, the results strongly suggest that the behavior can be classified as an adjunctive behavior that is similar to adjunctive behaviors generated by the intermittent presentation of other positive reinforcers.     

Schedule-dependent effects of haloperidol and amphetamine: multiple-schedule task shows within-subject effects

A two-lever, multiple-schedule task was used to evaluate the effects of haloperidol (HA) and amphetamine (AM) on responding controlled by continuous reinforcement (CRF) and progressive ratio (PR) schedules of reinforcement. Rats were trained to press one lever for food delivered on a CRF schedule and the other lever for food delivered on a PR schedule. The operative schedule was signaled by the illumination of a cuelight mounted above the appropriate lever. Following 30 sessions of training, dose-response functions were determined for HA (0.0075, 0.015, 0.03, and 0.06 mg/kg) and AM (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mg/kg). Both drugs produced dose- and schedule-dependent effects. For example, administration of 0.03 mg/kg HA did not affect responding under the CRF schedule but did reduce responding during PR components, whereas administration of 0.06 mg/kg reduced responding under both schedules of reinforcement. Some doses of AM produced increased responding under the CRF schedule and, within the same session, decreased responding under the PR schedule. The results with HA are consistent with the view that interfering with dopaminergic function affects the allocation and maintenance of responding and that this effect depends on properties of the schedule of reinforcement. The results with AM emphasize that statements about the effects of the drug on positively reinforced behavior cannot be made without reference to specific schedules of reinforcement.     

Increased expression of the 5-HT6 receptor by viral mediated gene transfer into posterior but not anterior dorsomedial striatum interferes with acquisition of a discrete action-outcome task

Serotonin plays a role in reinforcement learning; however, it is not known which serotonin receptors mediate these effects. Serotonin 6 (5-HT(6)) receptors are abundant in the striatum, a brain area that is involved in reinforcement learning. We previously found that 5-HT(6) receptors in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) affect reinforcement learning or consolidation over several days. We use viral-mediated gene transfer to discern the role that 5-HT(6) receptors play in mediating post-synaptic responses in anterior versus posterior DMS. Male Long-Evans rats were used to study learning acquisition during a single session of 100 trials on a fixed interval of 20 seconds. In a discrete action-outcome learning task, rats had 10 seconds to press a lever to induce lever retraction and sucrose pellet delivery. In another group of rats, the task had a lever that was continuously extended but only active every 20 seconds, allowing for repetitive, mostly non-reinforced, lever pressing. Results demonstrate that increased expression of 5-HT(6) receptors in the posterior DMS interferes with earning sucrose pellets in only the former task. We take this to indicate that 5-HT(6) receptor signaling in the posterior DMS interferes with acquisition of discrete action-outcome responding.     

Cocaine self-administration improves performance in a highly demanding water maze task

Rationale Long-term potentiation (LTP) is considered to be a cellular substrate of learning and memory. Indeed, the involvement of LTP-like mechanisms in spatial learning has consistently been demonstrated in the Morris water maze test. We have previously shown that hippocampal LTP in Lewis rats was modulated by cocaine self-administration, although the performance of cocaine-self-administered rats in the Morris water maze was not altered. Objective Given that the ease of the task previously used could have masked any possible effects of the cocaine-induced LTP enhancement on spatial learning, a new and more difficult water maze task was devised to address this issue. Materials and methods Animals self-administered cocaine (1 mg/kg) or saline under a fixed ratio 1 schedule of reinforcement for 22 days. Spatial learning was assessed in a difficult water maze task (four sessions, two trials per session with a 90-min intertrial interval), and spatial memory was also evaluated 48 h after training (a 90-s test). Additionally, reversal learning and perseverance were also studied. Results There was a reduced latency in finding the hidden platform during training, as well as improved memory of the platform location in cocaine-self-administered rats with respect to animals that self-administered saline. No differences were observed in reversal learning or perseverance between groups. Conclusions Our data suggest that cocaine self-administration facilitates learning and memory in the water maze test only when animals are submitted to highly demanding tasks, involving working memory or consolidation-like processes during the intertrial interval. Del Olmo and Higuera-Matas contributed equally to this work.     

The pharmacological characterization of attentional processes using a two-lever choice reaction time task in rats

Activating the noradrenergic and cholinergic systems is known to enhance attentional processes, while stimulating dopaminergic, serotonergic, and GABAergic systems suppresses them. The objective of the present study was to investigate the pharmacological characterization in the attentional processes of a two-lever choice reaction time (CRT) task using different centrally acting drugs. We designed seven parameters in this task: the correct response (CR) rate; error response rate; nonresponse (NR) rate; differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO) responses; number of incorrect lever pressings during both the intertrial interval and DRO periods; the mean CRT of CR; and activity during 30 trials. The compounds produced different profiles at each dose. 1) Facilitative and disruptive effects on attentional processes occurred with changes in CRT alone. Scopolamine (0.1 mg/kg) and prazosin (0.3-1 mg/kg) prolonged the CRT, whereas methamphetamine (0.3 mg/kg) shortened the CRT. 2) Attentional deficits occurred with abnormal behavior showing premature response or perseverative behavior. Scopolamine (0.2-1 mg/kg), methamphetamine (3 mg/kg), delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (10 mg/kg), and MK-801 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg) produced a marked increase in the number of total lever pressings. 3) Motor function deficits rather than attentional deficits occurred. 8-OH DPAT (1 mg/kg) and muscimol (1 mg/kg) produced a decrease in CR and an increase in NR with a marked decrease in activity and prolonged the CRT. Activating noradrenergic alpha(1) receptors was found to enhance the attentional processes, while blocking muscarinic receptors, alpha(1) receptors, and NMDA receptors, and stimulating cannabinoid receptors and the dopaminergic systems impaired the attentional processes in the two-lever CRT task.     

Interactions between alcohol and nicotine on intracranial self-stimulation and locomotor activity in rats.

These studies were aimed at investigating interactions between alcohol and nicotine on operant behavior and on locomotor activity. Independent groups of rats with electrodes in the lateral hypothalamus were trained to lever press for intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) on either a fixed-ratio 15 (FR 15), FR 30, fixed-interval 15-second (FI 15-s) or FI 30-s schedule of reinforcement. In the FI 15-s experiment, nicotine increased and alcohol decreased responding. This also happened in the FI 30-s experiment; however, when the two drugs were combined, an increase in lever pressing occurred which was greater than that produced by nicotine alone. Nicotine increased rates in the FR 15 schedule but, when combined with alcohol, did not reverse the decrease in rates produced by alcohol. In the FR 30 schedule, nicotine also increased response rates, but did not reverse the decrease produced by alcohol in this paradigm. A separate group of animals was tested in a locomotor activity apparatus following administration of nicotine, alcohol or their combination. Nicotine increased locomotor activity and alcohol depressed it. However, when 0.10 or 0.17 mg/kg nicotine was combined with 0.3 g/kg alcohol, an increase greater than that produced by nicotine alone occurred. We have found that alcohol and nicotine together can produce a potentiation of nicotine's stimulatory effects depending upon the dose and the requirements of the task.     

Multiple 5-HT receptors are involved in the effects of acute MDMA treatment: studies on locomotor activity and responding for conditioned reinforcement

RATIONALE: Responding for conditioned reinforcement is increased by the dopamine releasing agent amphetamine, but reduced by drugs that enhance serotonin (5-HT) function. The amphetamine derivative 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, Ecstasy) releases both monoamines. OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study was to examine the effects of MDMA on responding for conditioned reinforcement as well as on locomotor activity. The roles of several 5-HT receptor sub-types in mediating these behavioural effects of MDMA were also examined. METHODS: Locomotion was measured in photocell activity monitors. For conditioned reinforcement experiments thirsty rats learned to associate a conditioned stimulus (CS) with water in operant chambers. Subsequently, two response levers were available; responding on one lever delivered the CS, while responding on the second lever had no consequences. Drug effects on this operant response were measured. RESULTS: MDMA dose-dependently increased locomotion but reduced responding for conditioned reinforcement. This latter effect differs from that induced by amphetamine, which potentiates conditioned reinforcement responding. The stimulant effect of MDMA was attenuated by GR127935 and ketanserin, indicating facilitatory roles of 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(2A) receptors in mediating this effect. The 5-HT(2C) antagonist SB242084 enhanced the stimulant effect of MDMA. Only SB242084 attenuated the suppressant effect of MDMA on responding for conditioned reinforcement. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors play a facilitatory role in mediating the stimulant effect of MDMA, whereas 5-HT(2C) receptors are inhibitory. Activation of 5-HT(2C) receptors also contributes to the deficit in operant responding. Multiple 5-HT receptor sub-types appear to contribute to the behavioural effects of MDMA.     

Estradiol impairs response inhibition in young and middle-aged, but not old rats

Estrogens have been shown to have a strong influence on such cognitive domains as spatial memory, response learning, and several tasks of executive function, including both working memory and attention. However, the effects of estrogens on inhibitory control and timing behavior, both important aspects of executive function, have received relatively little attention. We examined the effects of estradiol on inhibitory control and timing behavior using a differential reinforcement of low rates of responding (DRL) task. Ovariectomized young (3 month), middle-aged (12 month), and old (18 month) Long-Evans rats were implanted with Silastic implants containing 0, 5 or 10% 17β-estradiol in cholesterol vehicle and were tested on a DRL task requiring them to wait 15 s between lever presses to receive a food reinforcer. The ratio of reinforced to non-reinforced lever presses did not differ across age in the cholesterol vehicle group. Conversely, 17β-estradiol impaired learning of the DRL task in young and middle-aged rats, but the learning of old rats was not impaired relative to vehicle controls following either 5% or 10% 17β-estradiol treatment. Overall, old rats also made fewer lever presses than both the young and middle-aged rats. These results provide new evidence that estrogens impair inhibitory control, an important aspect of self regulation, and add to existing evidence that estrogens differentially affect cognition at different ages.     

Effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine on timing in the rat

Rats were trained to press a lever for food pellets provided according to a fixed interval 60-sec schedule of reinforcement. Probe trials (peak trials) assessed responding over two-min periods with no pellet delivered. The low rates of responding found early and late in probe trials were increased by methylphenidate and 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine (rate-dependent effect). Further, the mean time of responding (peak time) was shortened for both drugs (timing effect).     

Comparative effects of ethanol on motor activity and operant behavior.

Ethanol effects on two types of motor activity and on lever responding for food delivered on a fixed-ratio 20 (FR 20) reinforcement schedule were compared using C57BL/6 (C57) mice. Low doses of ethanol (1-2 g/kg) transiently elevated horizontal activity and high doses (2.5 and 3.0 g/kg) reduced this behavior throughout testing with a slight recovery toward the end of a 16-min test period. In contrast, similar ethanol doses produced a monotonic reduction in both vertical activity and lever responding for food under the FR 20 schedule. The ethanol-induced reduction in FR 20 lever responding was less prolonged than the reduction in vertical activity but was more prolonged than the reduction in horizontal activity. Because vertical activity and lever responding for food delivered on the FR 20 schedule were never elevated, were reduced at ethanol doses that either stimulated or depressed horizontal activity, and were unaffected by low ethanol doses that did not affect horizontal activity, it is unlikely that either are sensitive to the stimulatory effects of ethanol. Accountable mechanisms for the different effects of ethanol on the three behaviors are unknown; however, the present study eliminates ethanol dose, postinjection time, testing time, and food deprivation condition as possible reasons for the differences.     

The effects of repeated treatment with 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on the lever press responding of the rat under FI and DRL schedules of food reinforcement

In general, the effects of 8-OH-DPAT on the body temperature of rats or in inducing the 5-HT syndrome show rapid tolerance. However, in contrast, the 8-OH-DPAT-induced increase in the activity of rats in a two-way active avoidance task only occurs after repeated administration, i.e. there is sensitisation. The present study was conducted to examine whether this developing hyperactivity may also be expressed as increased rates of lever press responding, and if so, under which conditions it occurs. Rats were trained to press levers under fixed interval 60-s (FI 60) or differential reinforcement of low rates 20-s or 72-s (DRL20, DRL72) schedules of food reinforcement. Groups of trained rats were then treated daily 5 min before testing with doses of 0.01, 0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT SC for 10–21 days. In all three procedures, in the first couple of days of drug treatment, 8-OH-DPAT generally suppressed lever pressing in a dose-dependent manner. Thereafter, tolerance to this effect was seen to a greater (DRL20, DRL72) or lesser (FI60) extent. Some evidence for stimulation of low rates of lever press responding was seen after 10 days treatment under FI60, but not in DRL20 or DRL72 during short 30 to 60 min long daytime tests although in the latter case, the rats responded to the stimulating effects of 0.8 mg/kg SC amphetamine administered once at the end of the experiment. However, when rats were allowed to respond under DRL72 testing for 12 h during the night, after 10 days treatment a clear stimulation of lever pressing was observed. This stimulation was not specific to lever pressing, however, since a stimulation of entries into the food tray and licking were also seen. From these results, it may be concluded that the stimulating effect of 8-OH-DPAT after repeated administration may be expressed as increased rates of lever pressing, but not under all conditions in which psychomotor stimulation by amphetamine is seen. The potential for 8-OH-DPAT and related compounds to stimulate motor responding in this way should be taken into account when interpreting the effects of these drugs in animal models of psychiatric disorders.     

The effects of fenfluramine and fluoxetine on the acquisition of a conditioned avoidance response in rats

This study tested a behavior-suppressing punishment system and how its activity may be altered by agents known to interrupt or enhance serotonergic (5-HT) transmission. Holtzman male albino rats were tested for shuttle box avoidance acquisition and intertrial responding either 1 or 8 h following daily injections of fenfluramine (FEN) or fluoxetine (FXT). When the drug-test interval was 1 h, a time when both drugs are presumably potentiating 5-HT activity, avoidance acquisition and intertrial responding were impaired. When testing occurred 8 h after drug treatment, a time when 5-HT levels are unaltered by FXT and are maximally reduced by FEN, these drugs had no effect on avoidance acquisition, but FEN produced an increase in intertrial responses whereas FXT did not. These results support the proposal of an inhibitory 5-HT system. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that FEN is capable of exerting a biphasic action on intertrial responding and suggest that the time interval between drug administration and behavioural testing is a crucial variable when investigating FEN.     

Biochemical and behavioral effects of intrahippocampal AF64A in rats

AF64A (ethylcholine aziridinium, 1 nmole) injected into the dorsal hippocampus of the rat decreased choline acetyltransferase activity there by 20% without greatly affecting adjacent areas. The decrease was maximal by 3 days, and persisted for at least 3 weeks. The acetylcholine concentration at the injection site was decreased by 25-30% from 3 days to 4 weeks. Rats were trained on a continuous reinforcement (CRF) food-reinforced lever press schedule and then injected bilaterally in the dorsal and ventral hippocampus. Subsequent switching to a daily CRF-extinction schedule resulted in increased responding during extinction compared to controls which persisted for at least 13 session. However, injection after switching schedules increased it for only 2 sessions. This indicates that the persistently increased extinction responding is due mainly to impaired learned habituation to a new schedule. Most of the extinction effect of the intrahippocampal AF64A was due to its injection at the dorsal site. Separate rats which were trained on the 8-arm radial maze task (a test of short-term spatial working memory) and injected as above only showed marginally impaired task performance even at higher doses. We conclude that even relatively minor, localized, cholinergic deficits confined to the hippocampus can produce significant learning and memory impairments in situations where intermediate or long term memory formation is required.     

Effects of NMDA receptor channel blockers, MK-801 and memantine, on locomotor activity and tolerance to delay of reward in Wistar-Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive rats

N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor blockade enhances motor activity and stimulates dopamine metabolism, effects shared with classical psychostimulant drugs. The present study aimed to characterize behavioral effects of two NMDA receptor channel blockers, MK-801 and memantine, in both Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) and spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) rats. In Experiment 1, SHR rats demonstrated higher spontaneous locomotor activity and spent more time in the central area of the open field apparatus compared with WKY rats. Rats of both strains pre-treated with MK-801 (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) or memantine (1-32 mg/kg) demonstrated dose-dependent increases in the total distance traveled and time spent in the central area. Experiment 2 was based on the two-lever discrete-trial delayed reinforcement task in which rats could press one lever to obtain one pellet immediately or another lever for four pellets delivered after a variable delay (0-60 s). Tolerance to delay of reward did not differ between strains. MK-801 (0.03-0.3 mg/kg) and memantine (1-10 mg/kg) produced small, but significant, facilitation of the large-reward lever responding and markedly impaired operant performance at higher dose levels (increased number of missed trials). For both experiments, effects of MK-801 and memantine were more pronounced in WKY compared with SHR rats. Additional studies are needed to address the utility of noncompetitive NMDA receptor blockers in the treatment of attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder.     

Dissociating the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine using a rat self-administration paradigm with concurrently available drug and environmental reinforcers

Rationale Nicotine has two effects on reinforcement in traditional self-administration paradigms. It serves as a primary reinforcer by increasing the probability of behaviors that result in nicotine delivery. However, nicotine also potently enhances behaviors that result in the delivery of nonpharmacological reinforcers. Objectives The present study sought to dissociate these two effects of nicotine on reinforcement. Methods For one group of rats (2 lever), a nonpharmacological reinforcer [visual stimulus (VS)] was available for pressing one lever. Nicotine infusions were available for pressing a different lever. A second group (NIC + VS) received more traditional self-administration training; both the VS and nicotine were delivered for pressing a single active lever. Control groups received either nicotine infusions (NIC only) or VS presentations (VS only) for pressing the active lever. Results Nicotine alone was a weak reinforcer; the VS alone was slightly more reinforcing than nicotine. When these two reinforcers were combined (NIC + VS), response rates were synergistically increased. For the 2-lever group, responding on the nicotine lever was weak, matching the response rates of rats receiving nicotine alone. However, responding on the VS lever was potently enhanced in this group; equaling the response rates for rats receiving both reinforcers for making a single response (NIC + VS). Conclusions These data indicate that the reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine are very potent even when only moderate quantities of the drug are self-administered. Moreover, they provide the first demonstration that the reinforcement-enhancing and primary reinforcing effects of nicotine can be dissociated behaviorally.     

Effect of amphetamine on response inhibition in rats showing high or low response to novelty

Previous work has shown that rats categorized as either high responder (HR) or low responder (LR) based on the amount of activity assessed in a novel environment show a differential response to stimulant reward, with HR rats self-administering more amphetamine and cocaine than LR rats. The current study assessed behavioral inhibitory processes in HR and LR rats using either fixed consecutive number (FCN) or differential reinforcement of low rate of responding (DRL) tasks. Individual differences in free-choice preference for a novel environment or novel object were also assessed to determine if these measures were predictive of performance on these inhibitory tasks. Results showed that, regardless of the test used to characterize individual differences in response to novelty, groups showed a similar ability to learn the FCN and DRL tasks. When subsequently pretreated with amphetamine, there was no significant difference between groups in performance efficiency (accuracy) on either the FCN or DRL task; however, based on activity in inescapable novelty, HR rats were less sensitive than LR rats to amphetamine-disrupted responding on the reinforcement lever in the FCN task. Although a deficit in inhibition is generally thought to play a role in drug abuse behavior, the differential rate of stimulant self-administration described previously between HR and LR rats more likely reflects an incentive motivational effect that is independent of response inhibition.     

Alteration of response patterning by d-amphetamine on repeated acquisition in rats

The acute effects of d-amphetamine on response patterning in a repeated acquisition baseline were investigated with rats. Each session the animals acquired a different four-member response sequence on three levels. Each sequence (trial) completion produced a food pellet. Errors produced a brief timeout that was reset by responses made during the timeout. Acute doses of d-amphetamine (0.5–4.0 mg/kg) and saline were administered 30 min presession. The response patterns analyzed were perseverative responses to a single lever (runs), and a response to each lever in either a left-to-right or right-to-left direction (tranerses). The trial position, frequency, and lever location of error and timeout responses that occurred in the context of runs and traverses were studied. In contrast to control sessions, higher doses of d-amphetamine produced increases in the number of error and timeout responses emitted. The majority of these responses occurred as runs; traverse responding did not exceed control levels. Furthermore, the run error and timeout responding tended to occur early in the session and on a siingle response lever. The results are consistent with the view that d-amphetamine disrupts stimulus control and produces perseverative responding which may account for previous reports of disruption in repeated acquisition tasks following d-amphetamine administration.     

The 5-HT(2) receptor activation enhances impulsive responding without increasing motor activity in rats

The effects of 5-HT(2) receptor ligands on the performance of rats were investigated using a 5-choice serial reaction time (5-CSRT) task. Systemic administration of DOI (0.03 to 0.3 mg/kg subcutaneously [SC]), a 5-HT(2) receptor agonist, did not impair choice accuracy of well-performing rats under either baseline conditions or more demanding conditions of the task, in which the stimulus duration or intensity were reduced or the intertrial interval (ITI) was decreased. DOI (0.1 mg/kg or 0.15 mg/kg) increased premature responding (the probability of intertrial interval hole pokes) in all testing conditions, except under conditions of a short ITI when the rats did not make any hole responses. Ketanserin (0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg SC), a 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist, had no marked effect on performance. When combined with ketanserin (0.2 mg/kg SC), however, DOI (0.1 mg/kg) did not increase premature responding. The lowest doses of DOI (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) that increase premature responding had no effect on open-field performance. Further, the effects of systemically administered DOI were not reproduced by bilateral administration of DOI into the anterior cingulate cortex. These data indicate that excessive activation of 5-HT(2A/2C) receptors interferes with response control rather than visual attention. Furthermore, the DOI-induced enhancement of impulsive responses are not due to locomotor hyperactivity, and the anterior cingulate cortex is not the primary site of action for this enhancement of premature responding.     

Opposing effects of vasopressin on matching versus non-matching to position: further evidence for response,not memory,modulation

Rats were trained on either of two related variants of an operant memory task. In the matching to position (MTP) task, one of two retractable response levers appeared, at random, as the sample. A response caused the lever to retract and this was followed by a delay (0–32 s) interval, during which the subjects had to approach and respond at the magazine tray. Both levers were then presented and the rat had to respond, for food reward, to the one which had appeared as the sample. A second group of rats learned non-matching to position (NMTP). This task was very similar to MTP, with one crucial difference: here, the subject had to respond to the lever which hadnot appeared as the sample. Both groups of rats learned their respective tasks rapidly, performance depending on the delay interval as expected. They were then injected, peripherally, with different doses of arginine-vasopressin (AVP: 0–25 µg/kg), a peptide which others have argued improves mnemonic performance. There was evidence to suggest that MTP performance was improved by AVP; on the other hand, NMTP performance appeared to be disrupted. It is suggested that AVP induces a bias towards responding on one side of the two lever test chamber. In other words, it affects motor or motivational, not mnemonic mechanisms.