Phase II study of thalidomide in patients with metastatic melanoma

The aim of this study was to determine the antitumour activity and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with metastatic melanoma. Between July 1999 and July 2001, 20 patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled into this study. Patients were required to have progressive disease following standard therapies (unless there was a known contraindication for their usage) and to be free from symptomatic brain metastases. Thalidomide was administered orally at a starting dose of 200 mg/day, with increments of 100 mg every 7 days to a maximum dose of 800 mg/day. Patients experiencing intolerable side effects had their dose reduced to the maximum tolerated dose. Response and tolerance to treatment were assessed at 4 week intervals and therapy was continued until progression of disease or development of intolerable side effects despite appropriate dose reduction. All 20 patients were assessable for response. No objective response (complete or partial remission) was observed. In seven patients (35%), stable disease with a duration of 12-32 weeks (median 16 weeks) was seen. The median time to progression for all patients was 8 weeks (range 5-32 weeks) and the median overall survival was 20 weeks (range 7-130+ weeks). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Nine patients (45%) were able to tolerate the maximal planned dose of thalidomide (800 mg/day). Constipation, fatigue, somnolence and dryness of skin or mouth were the most common side effects. Thalidomide appears to possess cytostatic activity in patients with metastatic melanoma. Further studies of thalidomide in melanoma are warranted.     

Multi-centre phase II trial of Thalidomide in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a hypervascular tumour, which overexpresses vascular endothelial growth factor. Thalidomide is an antiangiogenic agent with activity in refractory multiple myeloma. The purpose of this multi-centre phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with advanced HCC. From February 2000 to November 2001, 37 patients with histologically proven, bi-dimensionally measurable advanced, unresectable HCC were enrolled. The starting dose of Thalidomide was 100 mg per day and escalated weekly by 100 mg to a maximum dose of 800 mg/day according to individual patient tolerance. Radiological tumour response and treatment related toxicities were prospectively assessed. Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for toxicity and 24 patients were evaluable for response. The median Thalidomide dose was 400 mg/day. There was no complete response (CR). One patient had a radiological partial response (PR) (3%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0% to 8%) and six (16%) patients had stable disease for more than 6 months. Somnolence and fatigue were the most common side effects, occurring in 84% and 73% of patients respectively. Thalidomide monotherapy is tolerable and associated with modest antitumour activity in advanced HCC.     

Phase II trial of thalidomide for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with RCC were treated with thalidomide at a starting dose of 200 mg daily. Thalidomide was increased by 200 mg every 2 weeks until a maximum dose of 800 mg or prohibitive toxicity was reached. Fifteen patients had prior nephrectomy, 11 patients had no prior systemic therapy, and 15 had received one prior systemic regimen. RESULTS: A maximum dose of 800 mg, 600 mg, 400 mg, and 200 mg was reached in five, 10, eight, and three patients, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 dyspnea occurred in four and three patients, respectively. Grade 2 and 3 neurologic toxicity was observed in five and two patients, respectively. Of the 25 assessable patients, the best response was stable disease in 16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 82%) patients. The 6-month progression-free survival rate was 32% (95% CI, 14% to 50%). Three patients achieved prolonged stable disease of 16, 16+, and 18+ months, including two patients who were refractory to previous cytokine therapy. Fifty-seven percent were alive at 1 year (95% CI, 37% to 76%). CONCLUSION: This trial does not support the routine use of thalidomide to induce partial response for metastatic RCC. Because disease stabilization occurs as a part of the natural history of metastatic RCC, the potential effect of thalidomide on progression-free and overall survival for patients with advanced RCC is being addressed in a randomized phase III trial. New immunomodulatory analogs of thalidomide that have shown potentially greater antitumor effects in preclinical models warrant study in metastatic RCC.     

Low-dose thalidomide treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy of oral thalidomide in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with unresectable and nonembolizable HCC were consecutively enrolled in a compassionate treatment program of oral thalidomide. Tumor response and treatment-related toxicity were prospectively followed. Thalidomide was given at a starting dose of 200 mg per day. The dose was gradually escalated in 100-mg steps up to 600 mg per day if no limiting toxicities developed. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were evaluable for response. One complete and 3 partial responses, defined by World Health Organization criteria, were seen, with a response rate of 6.3% (95% CI 0-12.5). The duration of response was 50+, 24.6, 11.6+ and 8.7+ weeks, respectively. All 4 responders had a dramatic decrease in alpha-fetoprotein (alpha-FP) levels. Another 6 of the 42 patients with elevated alpha-FP levels before treatment had a more than 50% decrease in their alpha-FP levels after thalidomide treatment. Totally 10 patients had an objective response to thalidomide. The median overall survival for all of the 68 patients was 18.7 weeks (95% CI 11.8- 25.6) with a 1-year survival rate of 27.6%. The median overall survival of the 10 patients with an objective response to thalidomide was 62.4 weeks (95% CI 31.2-93.6 weeks). All responders responded at a dose equal to or less than 300 mg per day. Toxicities of thalidomide were generally manageable, and only 16, 6, and 0 patients developed grade 2, 3, and 4 toxicities, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low-dose thalidomide is safe and induces unequivocal tumor response in a minority of patients with advanced HCC.     

A phase II study of thalidomide and irinotecan for treatment of glioblastoma multiforme

Purpose Irinotecan is a cytotoxic agent with activity against gliomas. Thalidomide, an antiangiogenic agent, may play a role in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). To evaluate the combination of thalidomide and irinotecan, we conducted a phase II trial in adults with newly-diagnosed or recurrent GBM. Patients and methods Thalidomide was given at a dose of 100 mg/day, followed by dose escalation every 2 weeks by 100 mg/day to a target of 400 mg/day. Irinotecan was administered on day 1 of each 3 week cycle. Irinotecan dose was 700 mg/m² for patients taking enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants and 350 mg/m² for all others. The primary endpoint was tumor response, assessed by MRI. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Twenty-six patients with a median age of 55 years were enrolled, with fourteen evaluable for the primary outcome, although all patients were included for secondary endpoints. One patient (7%) exhibited a partial response after twelve cycles, and eleven patients (79%) had stable disease. The intention to treat group with recurrent disease included 16 patients who had a 6-month PFS of 19% (95% CI: 4–46%) and with newly-diagnosed disease included 10 patients who had a 6-month PFS of 40% (95% CI: 12–74%). Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity was mild, but six patients (23%) experienced a venous thromboembolic complication. Two patients had Grade 4 treatment-related serious adverse events that required hospitalization. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination of irinotecan and thalidomide has limited activity against GBM. Mild GI toxicity was observed, but venous thromboembolic complications were common. Presented in part at the 8th Annual SNO Meeting in Keystone, CO, November 13–16, 2003.     

Phase II trial of thalidomide with chemotherapy and as maintenance therapy for patients with poor prognosis small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Despite the high response rates achieved following standard chemotherapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), the majority of patients will subsequently die from disease progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide, an anti-angiogenic agent, in combination with carboplatin and etoposide and as maintenance therapy in patients with untreated SCLC. Twenty-five chemotherapy-naive patients with extensive disease (ED) or limited disease (LD) SCLC were enrolled in a single-arm phase II study. Carboplatin and etoposide were given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles with concurrent thalidomide 100mg orally daily. The treatment with thalidomide was continued as maintenance for up to 2 years. RESULTS: Median progression free and overall survival were 8.3 months and 10.1 months, respectively. One-year survival was 40% and the 1-year progression-free survival was 36%. The overall response rate was 68% (95% CI 46-85%) with four complete remissions (20%) and 13 partial remissions (48%). We observed no increase in chemotherapy related toxicity. Thalidomide was well-tolerated and median time on thalidomide treatment was 7.6 months. CONCLUSION: Concurrent thalidomide with chemotherapy followed by maintenance thalidomide appears to be well tolerated. The results on tumour response rate and survival led us to initiate a randomised phase III trial in the United Kingdom.     

Phase II study of thalidomide in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The hypervascular nature of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is well characterized. Recent data have suggested that thalidomide possesses antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory activity. Therefore, the authors initiated a study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of thalidomide in patients with advanced HCC as primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were unresectable HCC with bidimentionally measurable disease, age > or = 18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < or = 2, and adequate organ function. Thalidomide was administered at a starting dose of 200 mg per day in a 100-mg-per-week dose escalation regimen, up to the maximum tolerated dose or to 800 mg per day. Toxicity was monitored according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 27 patients were eligible and assessable for toxicity and response. A median daily dose of 300 mg was achieved. One patient experienced near-complete recovery of alpha-fetoprotein levels and a partial radiographic response on computed tomography. Two patients had stable disease during the 16-week study period. The median duration of progression-free survival was 42 days. The overall median survival was 123 days. Fatigue and somnolence were the most common side effects, occurring in 81% and 62% of patients, respectively. No Grade 4 hematologic toxicity was observed. Three patients experienced Grade 4 hepatic toxicity (namely, hyperbilirubinemia). CONCLUSIONS: With gradual dose escalation, thalidomide was tolerated in most patients with advanced HCC. However, treatment with thalidomide alone was associated with only a modest response in the treatment of HCC.     

A prospective randomized trial of thalidomide with topotecan compared with topotecan alone in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide is an antiangiogenic agent with immune modulating potential. The objective of this study was to determine response rates among women who were treated for recurrent ovarian cancer using topotecan with or without thalidomide. METHODS: Women were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, randomized phase 2 trial between April 2001 and July 2005. Eligible patients had recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma with measurable disease or elevated CA 125 values. Patients had received prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Treatment arms received topotecan at a dose of 1.25 mg/m(2) on Days 1 through 5 of a 21-day cycle with or without thalidomide starting at a dose of 200 mg per day and then increasing the dose as tolerated. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. The chi-square test was used to assess differences in response and toxicity, and the log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: The analysis included 69 women (39 women in the control arm and 30 women in the thalidomide arm). Known prognostic factors, including platinum sensitivity, were represented equally in each arm. The median thalidomide dose was 200 mg per day. The overall response rate in the control arm was 21% (complete response [CR] rate, 18%; partial response [PR] rate, 3%) compared with 47% in the thalidomide arm (CR rate, 30%; PR rate, 17%) (P= .03). The median progression-free survival for the control arm was 4 months compared with 6 months in the thalidomide arm (P= .02). The median overall survival was 15 months in the control arm and 19 months in the thalidomide arm (P= .67). Toxicities were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of thalidomide to topotecan for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer appears to improve response rates, and the authors believe that it warrants study through larger phase 3 trials.     

Thalidomide for previously untreated indolent or smoldering multiple myeloma.

We conducted a clinical trial of thalidomide as initial therapy for asymptomatic smoldering (SMM) or indolent multiple myeloma (IMM). Sixteen patients were studied. Thalidomide was given orally at a dose of 200 mg/day for 2 weeks, and then increased as tolerated by 200 mg/day every 2 weeks to a maximum dose of 800 mg/day. Bone marrow microvessel density (MVD) and angiogenesis grading were estimated using CD34 immunostaining. Six patients had a confirmed response to therapy with at least 50% or greater reduction in serum and urine monoclonal (M) protein. When minor responses (25-49%) decrease in M protein concentration) were included, 11 of 16 patients (69%) responded to therapy. Major grade 3-4 toxicities included two patients with somnolence, and one patient each with syncope and neutropenia. Pre-treatment MVD was not a significant predictor of response to therapy, median MVD 4 and 12 in responders and non-responders respectively, P = 0.09. We conclude that thalidomide has significant activity in the treatment of newly diagnosed SMM/IMM. However, we do not recommend treatment with thalidomide at this stage since some patients with SMM/IMM can be stable for several months or years without any therapy. Additional randomized trials are needed to determine if thalidomide will delay progression to active multiple myeloma.     

Final report of toxicity and efficacy of a phase II study of oral cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and prednisone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A Hoosier Oncology Group Trial, HEM01-21

Thalidomide has direct antimyeloma and immunomodulatory effects. In addition, both thalidomide and metronomic chemotherapy inhibit angiogenesis. The synergy of such a combination may decrease toxicity while maintaining efficacy. The Hoosier Oncology Group conducted a phase II trial of oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg b.i.d. for 21 days), thalidomide (200 mg/day), and prednisone (50 mg q.o.d.) (CTP) per 28-day course in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). Of the 37 patients enrolled, 16 had prior stem cell transplantation. The median follow-up time was 25.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 23.2-27.7). Of 35 patients treated, 22 patients (62.9%) responded: 7 (20.0%) complete responses, 2 (5.7%) near-complete responses, and 13 (37.1%) partial responses. Eight patients (22.9%) had stable disease, and three (8.6%) had disease progression. Two patients withdrew from the study early due to reasons unrelated to progression or toxicity and were treated as nonresponders. The median time to best response and time to progression were 3.6 months (95% CI 2.8-10.9) and 13.2 months (95% CI 9.4-21.0), respectively. The median number of treatment cycles was seven (range 1-12 cycles). Grade III to IV toxicities included leukopenia (42.9%; febrile neutropenia, 11.4%), hyperglycemia (20%), sensory neuropathy (11.4%), thromboses (8%), and motor neuropathy (5.7%). No patient withdrew from the study due to toxicity. The efficacy and low toxicity of the CTP regimen support the future development of such an approach in MM.     

Thalidomide as an Anti-angiogenic Agent in Relapsed Gliomas

BACKGROUND: Thalidomide (alpha-phthalimidoglutarimide), a synthetic sedative drug, has anti-angiogenic properties due to inhibition of growth-factor mediated neovascularisation and has been shown to inhibit tumour growth in experimental solid tumour models. AIM: To assess response of recurrent malignant gliomas to thalidomide. METHODS: Eighteen patients with recurrent gliomas were enrolled to an open, non-randomised phase II trial between October 1997 and December 1999. All patients had failed following treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy with PCV and/or temozolomide regimens. Eleven patients had high-grade gliomas de novo and 7 high-grade gliomas following transformation of low-grade gliomas. Thalidomide was prescribed at 100 mg/day p.o. continuously. Response was assessed at 4-weekly intervals. Disease progression was defined as neurological deterioration and/or radiological evidence of increased tumour size. Treatment was discontinued at the time of disease progression, or if toxicity occurred, or at patients' request. RESULTS: Thalidomide was prescribed for a median of 42 days (range 7-244). Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity (peripheral sensory neuropathy) in 1 patient. Six patients died before response could be fully assessed and are classified as non-responders. Of 12 who continued treatment for more than 4 weeks, 1 patient had clinical and radiological response (PR), 2 patients had stable disease for 2 and 4 months respectively and 9 patients had disease progression. The median survival from the start of thalidomide was 2.5 months. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of thalidomide in terms of response in recurrent gliomas is low, with a partial response rate of only 6%. Future studies should investigate thalidomide in combination with other agents and at an earlier stage of disease. Methods to assess anti-angiogenic properties such as changes in tumour vasculature could be employed as initial surrogate end-points in the investigation of efficacy.     

A multicenter phase II trial of thalidomide and celecoxib for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Preclinical data indicates that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibition impairs plasma cell growth and potentially synergizes with thalidomide. We performed a trial in previously treated patients with myeloma using thalidomide up to a maximum dose of 800 mg/d with celecoxib (400 mg bid). Outcomes were compared with a prior trial of thalidomide. Sixty-six patients with median age of 67 (range, 43-85) received a median dose of thalidomide and celecoxib of 400 and 800 mg/d, respectively, with median durations of treatment of 27 and 13 weeks, respectively. The most common toxicities associated with premature discontinuation of celecoxib (n = 30 of 53, 57%) were fluid retention and deterioration of renal function. Overall response rate (RR) was 42% and with 20 months median follow-up; the actuarial median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.8 and 21.4 months, respectively. Unlike our prior study, age >65 years was not predictive of inferior RR due to improvement in RR in older patients with the combination (37% versus 15%, P = 0.08). The RR was superior in patients who received a total dose of celecoxib exceeding 40 g in the first 8 weeks of therapy (62% versus 30%, P = 0.021). Progression-free survival and overall survival were also improved. Other predictors for inferior progression-free survival were age >65 years (P = 0.016) and elevated beta(2)-microglobulin (P = 0.017). This study provides evidence that the addition of high-dose celecoxib adds to the antimyeloma activity of thalidomide but this comes with unacceptable toxicity. Future studies should use newer COX-2 inhibitors with thalidomide, or their respective derivatives.     

A pilot study of thalidomide in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The highly vascular nature of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) suggests that angiogenesis inhibition may be therapeutic for patients with this disease. Thalidomide inhibits basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-induced angiogenesis. METHODS: In a pilot study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of escalating doses of thalidomide in patients with progressive metastatic RCC (mRCC), measurable disease, and good organ function. Patients received oral thalidomide starting at 200 mg per day and increasing by 100-200 mg per day weekly until a target dose of 1200 mg per day was reached. Study endpoints were objective tumor response and toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 20 patients enrolled, 19 were evaluable for response. Eighteen achieved the target dose. The most common, but reversible, toxicities were constipation, somnolence, and fatigue. Peripheral neuropathy was seen after prolonged therapy, necessitating dose reduction. Two patients achieved a partial response and nine had stable disease for a median of 14 months (range, 3-17 months). Median time to progression was 4.7 months (range, 0.7-31.3 months). Fifteen patients died (median survival, 18.1 months; 95% lower confidence bound 10.7). Survival was significantly longer in patients with higher hemoglobin level and longer time from first metastasis to start of thalidomide, but significantly shorter in patients with multiple organ involvement and previous treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Thalidomide at this dose is associated with manageable acute toxicities but long-term dose-limiting neuropathy. Objective responses are rare in patients with mRCC and are characterized by delay in achieving maximum tumor reduction. Prolonged stable disease is seen in some patients, but the benefit of thalidomide, as well as other angiogenesis inhibitors, in that setting needs to be studied in controlled, randomized trials.     

Phase II trial of the antiangiogenic agent thalidomide in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

PURPOSE: Little progress has been made in the treatment of adult high-grade gliomas over the last two decades, thus necessitating a search for novel therapeutic strategies. Malignant gliomas are vascular or angiogenic tumors, which leads to the supposition that angiogenesis inhibition may represent a potentially promising strategy in the treatment of these tumors. We present the results of a phase II trial of thalidomide, a putative inhibitor of angiogenesis, in the treatment of adults with previously irradiated, recurrent high-grade gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a histologic diagnosis of anaplastic mixed glioma, anaplastic astrocytoma, or glioblastoma multiforme who had radiographic demonstration of tumor progression after standard external-beam radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy were eligible. Patients were initially treated with thalidomide 800 mg/d with increases in dose by 200 mg/d every 2 weeks until a final daily dose of 1,200 mg was achieved. Patients were evaluated every 8 weeks for response by both clinical and radiographic criteria. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were accrued, with 36 patients being assessable for both toxicity and response. Thalidomide was well tolerated, with constipation and sedation being the major toxicities. One patient developed a grade 2 peripheral neuropathy after treatment with thalidomide for nearly a year. There were two objective radiographic partial responses (6%), two minor responses (6%), and 12 patients with stable disease (33%). Eight patients were alive more than 1 year after starting thalidomide, although almost all with tumor progression. Changes in serum levels of basic fibroblastic growth factor (bFGF) were correlated with time to tumor progression and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Thalidomide is a generally well-tolerated drug that may have antitumor activity in a minority of patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. Future studies will better define the usefulness of thalidomide in newly diagnosed patients with malignant gliomas and in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Additionally, studies will be needed to confirm the potential utility of changes in serum bFGF as a marker of antiangiogenic activity and/or glioma growth.     

Thalidomide maintenance following high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support in myeloma

BackgroundRecent experience with thalidomide maintenance after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support has demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We further explored the tolerability and efficacy of lower doses of maintenance thalidomide in this single-institution study.Patients and MethodsThirty-eight patients with myeloma were enrolled and treated with melphalan 200 mg/m² followed by autologous stem cell transplantation. Thalidomide 50 mg per day was started on day ≥ 60 after recovery of blood counts and was escalated to a maximum dose of 200 mg per day. Responses were assessed at 2 months, 1 year, and 2 years after transplantation.ResultsOf the 38 enrolled patients, 7 patients never received thalidomide. Among 31 patients receiving thalidomide, complete or very good partial responses were observed in 65% and 42% of patients at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Tolerability was a major issue, with only 17 patients completing 1 year of thalidomide. The goal of dosing 200 mg per day was achieved in just 17 of 31 patients, and the median tolerated thalidomide dose was 100 mg per day. Sensory neuropathy was the primary reason for dose modification and discontinuation. No thromboembolic events were observed. The median PFS was 20.8 months, and the median OS was > 60 months.ConclusionThalidomide maintenance at a goal dose of 200 mg per day was not feasible in this population, with our data suggesting that 100 mg per day is a more reasonable maintenance dose.     

Thalidomide in refractory and relapsing multiple myeloma.

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) refractory to chemotherapy can only benefit from supportive measures and have a very short survival. Thalidomide has recently shown antitumor activity in patients with refractory myeloma. Twenty-three patients (12 men and 11 women; median age, 72 years) with advanced MM were treated with thalidomide. Sixteen patients had refractory disease and seven had untested relapse. The median dose of thalidomide was 400 mg d (range, 200 to 800 mg/d). The drug was generally administered in two divided doses. Five patients required treatment discontinuation because of toxicity. Twelve of 23 patients (52%) responded. Three (13%) achieved a partial response, with greater than 50% reduction in serum monoclonal (M)-protein levels, and nine (39%) attained a minimal response, with a greater than 25% decrease in serum M-protein levels. No decrease in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas was observed in six patients with extramedullary involvement.     

Therapeutic application of thalidomide in multiple myeloma.

Treatment with thalidomide and dexamethasone was given to 26 patients with active, previously untreated multiple myeloma (MM). Thalidomide was administered in an initial dosage of 200 mg/d for 2 weeks and then increased as tolerated (in 200-mg increments at 2-week intervals) to a maximum daily dose of 800 mg. Dexamethasone was given orally in a dosage of 40 mg/d on days 1 through 4, 9 through 12, and 17 through 20 in odd cycles and 40 mg/d on days 1 through 4 in even cycles at monthly intervals. Response was defined as a decrease in serum and urine monoclonal (M)-protein by 50% or greater. Twenty (77%) of 26 patients with active MM exhibited a therapeutic response. Among the first seven patients treated with a thalidomide dose of 400 mg, grade III to IV skin toxicity developed in two. Drug titration was then stopped and the thalidomide dose maintained at 200 mg/d. Six (86%) of seven patients showed a response after thalidomide dose escalation, whereas 14 (74%) of 19 patients demonstrated a response with a constant thalidomide dose of 200 mg/d. Thalidomide alone produced a response in six (38%) of 16 patients with smoldering or indolent myeloma. The angiogenesis grade was elevated in only 8% of these patients. Thirty-two patients with relapsed myeloma were treated with thalidomide dosed at 200 mg/d, with 200-mg escalations every 2 weeks to a maximum daily dose of 800 mg. Prior chemotherapy had failed and five (16%) patients had experienced relapse following stem cell transplantation. Ten (38%) of the 26 patients who had received at least two cycles of therapy obtained a response.     

Thalidomide in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to describe the experience with the anti-angiogenic agent thalidomide in the treatment of patients with a malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a histological confirmed diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma received thalidomide orally at night. Increasing doses of 100, 200 or maximally 400 mg were given till progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients that did not show signs of progression for > or =6 months were considered responders. Neurological examination included the use a sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) test. RESULTS: Forty patients were evaluable for toxicity and efficacy. Twenty of them (50%) had received prior treatment. Thirty patients (75%) received a dose of 400 mg, 11 (37%) required dose reduction and 10 patients were confined to a dose of 200 mg or less. The major toxicity elicited by thalidomide concerned constipation (18/40 grade I and II) and two patients developed grade II neurotoxicity. A decline in SNAP test (>50%) did not seem to be related to the extent of neurological complaints. Eleven patients (27.5%) showed disease stabilization for >6 months and the median survival was 230 days (CI 130-330). CONCLUSIONS: The advised dose for future studies in these patients is 200 mg/day. At this dose level, the toxicity is mild and routine monitoring of neurological toxicity (SNAP test) can be omitted. The percentage of patients seen with prolonged disease stabilization upon thalidomide treatment warrants phase III studies in MPM.     

Thalidomide in low doses is effective for the treatment of resistant or relapsed multiple myeloma and for plasma cell leukaemia

Thalidomide is an effective treatment for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), but is associated with a significant side effect profile at higher doses. In a recent study, only half of the enrolled patients were able to tolerate the maximum dose of 800 mg/day [Singhal, S., et al. (1999) "Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma", New Engl. J. Med. 341, 1565-1571]. Moreover, the dose-response relationship has not been defined. We report our use of low dose thalidomide in a small cohort of 12 patients-eight with relapsed or refractory MM and four with plasma cell leukaemia (PCL). Five of the 12 (42%) patients had a partial response, showing a median fall in their PP/BJP of 80% (63-90%) at a median dose of 175 mg (100-300 mg) with negligible side effects. Three of four patients with PCL showed an impressive response to treatment with thalidomide as a single agent. No patient who failed to show any evidence of response at low dose (<150 mg/day) responded to higher doses. In this study, thalidomide induces a similar rate of response at a lower and better tolerated dose than previously reported and produced "best ever" responses in patients with resistant PCL.     

Thalidomide as initial therapy for early-stage myeloma.

Patients with early-stage myeloma are typically observed without therapy until symptomatic disease occurs. However, they are at high risk of progression to symptomatic myeloma, with a median time to progression of approximately 1-2 years. We report the final results of a phase II trial of thalidomide as initial therapy for early-stage multiple myeloma in an attempt to delay progression to symptomatic disease. In total, 31 patients with smoldering or indolent multiple myeloma were studied at the Mayo Clinic. Two patients were deemed ineligible because they were found to have received prior therapy for myeloma, and were excluded from analyses except for toxicity. Thalidomide was initiated at a starting dose of 200 mg/day. Patients were followed-up monthly for the first 6 months and every 3 months thereafter. Of the 29 eligible patients, 10 (34%) had a partial response to therapy with at least 50% or greater reduction in serum and urine monoclonal (M) protein. When minor responses (25-49% decrease in M protein) were included, the response rate was 66%. Three patients had progressive disease while on therapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival are 80% at 1 year and 63% at 2 years. Major grade 3-4 toxicities included two patients with somnolence and one patient each with neuropathy, deep-vein thrombosis, hearing loss, weakness, sinus bradycardia, and edema. Thalidomide has significant activity in early-stage myeloma and has the potential to delay progression to symptomatic disease. This approach must be further tested in randomized trials.