Susceptibility of bacterial isolates to gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin from clinical trials 1997-1998

MICs of gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin against 3482 pre-treatment, clinical trial isolates collected during 1997–1998 are reported. These data suggested that gatifloxacin was four- to eight-fold more active than ciprofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria, with gatifloxacin MIC₉₀s≤0.33 mg/l against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae, and ≤1.0 mg/l versus viridans streptococci and Enterococcus faecalis. Both quinolones had similar MIC₉₀s versus Enterobacteriaceae (generally ≤0.38 mg/l, except 0.7–0.8 mg/l for Citrobacter freundii) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8 mg/l). A total of 78% P. aeruginosa had gatifloxacin MICs ≤2 mg/l. Gatifloxacin was more active than ciprofloxacin against Acinetobacter species and non-P. aeruginosa pseudomonads. Both had exceptional activity versus Haemophilus spp, Moraxella catarrhalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. In summary, compared to ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin had improved activity against Gram-positive bacteria and comparable activity against Gram-negative bacteria.     

In vitro activity of four fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa determined by the E test

Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and trovafloxacin were tested by the E-test against 100 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Ciprofloxacin was the most active of the tested agents with 82% of isolates having a MIC 8). Levofloxacin and trovafloxacin had nearly identical potency: 75% and 76% of the isolates were inhibited by 8 for levofloxacin; 0.19->8 for trovafloxacin). Ofloxacin was the least active of the four quinolones, with 43% of the isolates having a MIC >2 mg/l. All isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin were also resistant to the other agents, i.e. resistance to ciprofloxacin predicted resistance to all the quinolones tested in every case. This data demonstrates that fluoroquinolones are active agents against P. aeruginosa. In vitro susceptibility testing, however, is crucial to assess the resistance pattern in any specific location and for each individual agent.     

Comparative in vitro activity of gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin against 4151 Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms

Gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin are fluoroquinolones with enhanced Gram-positive activity while retaining broad-spectrum activity against Gram-negative pathogens. Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin are older quinolones with broad activity against Gram-negative pathogens and borderline activity against some Gram-positive organisms. We compared the in vitro activity of these compounds against 4151 Gram-negative and -positive organisms. Gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin were highly active against penicillin sensitive and resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were active but less potent. All compounds were highly active (overall) against Gram-negative pathogens with ciprofloxacin being the most active agent against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Our data indicate that the advanced fluoroquinolones will be important compounds for treating infections caused by Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.     

Multicentre study of the in vitro evaluation of moxifloxacin and other quinolones against community acquired respiratory pathogens.

The in vitro activity of moxifloxacin was compared with that of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin and trovafloxacin against 710 strains (180 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 180 Haemophilus influenzae, 160 Moraxella catarrhalis and 190 Streptococcus pyogenes) isolated from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections. MIC values for moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin were 0.25/0.25, 0.03/0.03, 0.06/0.03 and 0.125/0.0125 mg/l for S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, M. catharralis and S. pyogenes. Based upon the MIC(90) values and the MIC distributions, moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin were the most active of the quinolones tested. They showed enhanced activity against Gram-positive organisms including penicillin non susceptible S. pneumoniae strains. Moxifloxacin was also highly active against ciprofloxacin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains.     

Antibacterial activity of gatifloxacin against various fresh clinical isolates in 2002

Antibacterial activities of gatifloxacin (GFLX) and other antibacterial drugs against various fresh clinical strains (800 isolates) isolated from specimens of patients in 2002 were compared. GFLX was more active than levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria such as methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae. For these isolates, clarithromycin and azithromycin were less active (MIC90; > 16- > 64 micrograms/mL), GFLX was more active than cefdinir. For Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter species, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis, three quinolones including GFLX were potently active (MIC90; < or = 0.06-0.5 microgram/mL). Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from urinary tract infections were resistant to three quinolones including GFLX (MIC90; 32-64 micrograms/mL), however P. aeruginosa isolated from respiratory and otolaryngological infections were more susceptible (MIC90; 0.5-2 micrograms/mL). Quinolones were less active against Neisseria gonorrhoeae as compared with the cephem antibiotics tested, but GFLX was the most active against N. gonorrhoeae among the quinolones tested. In this study, we investigated activity of GFLX against fresh clinical strains isolated early in 2002, GFLX is widely and potently active against S. aureus, S. pneumoniae and various Gram-negative bacteria.     

In vitro susceptibility of 4903 bacterial isolates to gemifloxacin--an advanced fluoroquinolone

The in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against over 4900 bacterial isolates was determined by microbroth dilution with interpretation in accordance with NCCLS guidelines. Susceptibility results were compared with those for ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. Gemifloxacin and the other fluoroquinolones were not affected by either beta-lactamase production or penicillin-resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. The MIC90 values for gemifloxacin were: S. pneumoniae 0.063 mg/l; Haemophilus influenzae 0.016 mg/l; Moraxella catarrhalis 0.008 mg/l, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus 0.063 mg/l; methicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes 0.031 mg/l; Enterobacteriaceae 0.031-0.16 mg/l; Pseudomonas aeruginosa 4 mg/l; Neisseria meningitidis 0.008 mg/l. The MIC90 for gemifloxacin was lower than those for the other quinolones tested against S. pneumoniae (ciprofloxacin 2-4 mg/l, gatifloxacin 0.5 mg/l, levofloxacin 1-2 mg/l, moxifloxacin 0.25 mg/l). This study confirms the enhanced potent activity of gemifloxacin against Gram-positive pathogens, its broad-spectrum, Gram-negative activity and indicates that gemifloxacin is likely to have an important role in treating patients with Gram-positive and/or Gram-negative infections.     

Activity of gatifloxacin against strains resistant to ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin and its ability to select for less susceptible bacterial variants.

Gatifloxacin is an 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone. On quinolones, this side chain imparts increased activity against Gram-positive bacteria and enhanced killing. Gatifloxacin was tested against ofloxacin non-susceptible (ofloxacin MIC>2 mg/l) strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (gatifloxacin MIC(90), 1 mg/l) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, gatifloxacin MIC(90), 4 mg/l), and to ciprofloxacin non-susceptible (ciprofloxacin MIC>1 mg/l) strains of Escherichia coli (gatifloxacin MIC(90),>16 mg/l) and ciprofloxacin non-susceptible (ciprofloxacin MIC>0.06 mg/l) Neisseria gonorrhoeae (gatifloxacin MIC(50), 0.12 mg/l and MIC(90), 0.5 mg/l). Though gatifloxacin showed some reduced susceptibility to these populations, the MIC(50) and MIC(90) values suggest that gatifloxacin may be useful against pneumococci and some gonococcal strains not susceptible to other fluoroquinolones. Gatifloxacin did not select for less susceptible variants of MRSA and pneumococci, in contrast to the 10- to 100-fold higher selection frequencies with ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. The single-step E. coli mutants selected by gatifloxacin and the comparator quinolones had quinolone MICs within the susceptible range. These data suggest that gatifloxacin use may hinder the development of quinolone-resistance, particularly in Gram-positive bacteria.     

In vitro activity of gatifloxacin compared with gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against uropathogens cultured from patients with complicated urinary tract infections

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of gatifloxacin were compared with those of gemifloxacin, moxifloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin using an agar dilution method for 400 uropathogens cultured from the urine of urological patients with complicated and/or hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (UTI). The collection of strains was made up of Enterobacteriaceae (34.5%), enterococci (31.5%), staphylococci (21.2%) and non-fermenting bacteria (12.8%). The antibacterial activity of the three newer fluoroquinolones, gatifloxacin, gemifloxacin, and moxifloxacin, were similar, but showed some drug specific differences. Gemifloxacin was most active against Escherichia coli, but less so against Proteus mirabilis. In this series all isolates of E. coli were inhibited at a MIC of 0.25 mg/l gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin and by 0.125 mg/l gemifloxacin. The MIC distribution of all fluoroquinolones showed a bimodal distribution for staphylococci, enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The two modes for P. aeruginosa were 1 and 64 mg/l for gemifloxacin and moxifloxacin and 0.5 and 64 mg/l for gatifloxacin. For staphylococci the two modes were 0.125 and 2 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.03 and 4 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.03 and 2 mg/l for moxifloxacin; for enterococci, 0.25 and 16 mg/l for gatifloxacin, 0.06 and 2 mg/l for gemifloxacin, and 0.25 and 8 mg/l for moxifloxacin. Compared with trovafloxacin the MICs were similar, but the newer fluoroquinolones were more active than ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against Gram-positive bacteria. Of the newer fluoroquinolones gatifloxacin had the highest rate of renal excretion and could be considered a promising alternative fluoroquinolone agent for the treatment of UTI.     

Contemporary in vitro spectrum of activity summary for antimicrobial agents tested against 18569 strains non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli isolated in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2001)

The frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of 18 569 non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli consecutively collected as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program were summarized. The isolates were tested by the broth microdilution method in three coordinator laboratories using common reagents and reference methodologies. The most frequently isolated pathogen was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (11 968 isolates; 64.5%) followed by Acinetobacter spp. (3468 isolates; 18.7%) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (1488 isolates; 8.0%). The lowest resistance rates for P. aeruginosa documented were for amikacin (8%), meropenem (10%) and cefepime (10%), and all fluoroquinolones tested showed similar resistance rates (22–24%). The most active compounds against Acinetobacter spp. were the carbapenems, imipenem (11% resistance) and meropenem (12% resistance) followed by cefepime (31% resistance) and gatifloxacin (32% resistance). Very few compounds showed reasonable in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, with the most active antimicrobial agents being trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole, gatifloxacin and levofloxacin (5–6% resistance). Resistance surveillance among these organisms remains necessary to guide empirical antimicrobial therapy, especially for these less frequently isolated and difficult to test pathogens.     

In vitro activity of gemifloxacin and contemporary oral antimicrobial agents against 27247 Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic isolates: a global surveillance study

This study was a multi-centre, multi-country surveillance of 27247 Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates collected from 131 study centres in 44 countries from 1997 to 2000. MICs of gemifloxacin were compared with penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, azithromycin, clarithromycin, trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, grepafloxacin and levofloxacin by broth microdilution. Penicillin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae was extremely high in the Middle East (65.6%), Africa (64.0%) and Asia (60.4%) and lower in North America (40.3%), Europe (36.9%) and the South Pacific (31.8%). Macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae was highest in Asia (51.7%) but varied widely between laboratories in Europe (26.0%), North America (21.6%), the Middle East (13.7%), the South Pacific (10.6%) and Africa (10.0%). All the study quinolones were highly active against penicillin-resistant and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. Overall, gemifloxacin had the lowest MIC(90) at 0.06 mg/l with MICs 4-64-fold lower than ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and grepafloxacin against S. pneumoniae. Gemifloxacin MICs were more potent than grepafloxacin > levoflaxacin > ciproflaxin against the Gram-positive aerobes and shared comparable Gram-negative activity with ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin.     

甲磺酸加替沙星与其他4种氟喹诺酮类药物对临床分离菌的体外抗菌活性比较

目的 :比较甲磺酸加替沙星与氧氟沙星、左氧沙星、环丙沙星、司帕沙星对 182株临床分离菌的体外抗菌活性。方法 :采用琼脂平板二倍稀释法测定加替沙星等 5种氟喹诺酮类药物对 182株临床试验分离菌株的最低抑菌浓度 (MIC)。结果 :加替沙星对葡萄球菌属的MIC90 比其他 4种氟喹诺酮类药物低。葡萄球菌属对加替沙星的敏感率显著高于其他4种氟喹诺酮类药物 ;对其他G 球菌的MICR 也较其他氟喹诺酮类药物低。G-杆菌中埃希菌属、肠杆菌属对加替沙星的敏感率明显高于其他 4种氟喹诺酮类药物 ,加替沙星对埃希菌属、肠杆菌属的MIC90比左氧沙星低 2倍 ,比其他 3种抗菌药物低 8倍 ;假单胞菌属、克雷伯菌属和其他G-杆菌对加替沙星的敏感率与左氧沙星的差异无统计学意义 ,与其他 3种氟喹诺酮类药物的差异有统计学意义。结论 :甲磺酸加替沙星具有广谱而强大的体外抗菌活性。     

In vitro activity of levofloxacin against coagulase-positive and -negative staphylococci.

The in vitro activity of levofloxacin compared with that of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and norfloxacin were examined by conventional in vitro tests against 150 clinical isolates of staphylococci, subdivided according to species and susceptibility to methicillin. Although the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of all quinolones were highest in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains, the activity of levofloxacin was almost complete in methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis and methicillin-resistant S. haemolyticus when compared with ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, which showed more than 30% resistance. Methicillin-susceptible S. aureus and S. epidermidis strains were susceptible to all quinolones with few differences between the antibiotics tested. The minimal bactericidal activity of levofloxacin was within the double dilution range of MIC values for all strains tested, demonstrating its potent role against staphylococci. In time-kill studies, levofloxacin exerted bactericidal activity within 3 h against all staphylococci. These in vitro results suggest that levofloxacin is a potent fluoroquinolone against coagulase-negative staphylococci and that it is both methicillin-susceptible and resistant. Further studies are necessary to determine the role of this drug in the treatment of infections sustained by these microorganisms.     

Mutagenesis induced by 12 quinolone antibacterial agents in Escherichia coli WP2uvrA/pKM101.

The mutagenic potential of 12 quinolone antibacterial agents (quinolones) was examined at concentrations of 3.91-1000 ng/plate with or without S9 mix in Escherichia coli WP2uvrA/pKM101. All quinolones showed mutagenic potential in the strain: the maximum numbers of revertant colonies were observed at 7.81 ng/plate for clinafloxacin and sitafloxacin; 15.63 ng/plate for ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin; and 31.25-500 ng/plate for enoxacin, lomefloxacin, norfloxacin and ofloxacin. The numbers for all quinolones were comparable between the groups with and without S9 mix. In all quinolones, bactericidal effects were observed at one or two higher concentrations than their mutagenic concentrations except for enoxacin without S9 mix. From these results, the WP2uvrA/pKM101 strain is proved to be highly sensitive to quinolones.     

In vitro activity of gemifloxacin against clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with and without mutations in the gyrA gene

The MIC of gemifloxacin and five other quinolones was tested against 31 clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae; strains were analyzed for the presence of mutations in both the gyrA and parC genes. Only seven strains were resistant to nalidixic acid due to a mutation in the gyrA gene but not in the parC gene, with six and two considered intermediate to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, respectively. The activity of gemifloxacin was similar to that of trovafloxacin and moxifloxacin, but was more active than nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin against the gyrA mutant strains. Gemifloxacin is a valid therapeutic alternative to treat infections with N. gonorrhoeae, retaining its activity against strains already presenting a mutation in gyrA.     

Comparative in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of five fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare in vitro activity and pharmacodynamics of five fluoroquinolones against clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. DESIGN: In vitro analysis. SETTING: University research laboratory. INTERVENTION: Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for penicillin and five fluoroquinolones by E test for 201 S. pneumoniae isolates. Serum concentration-time profiles were simulated for the following regimens: ciprofloxacin 750 mg orally every 12 hours and 400 mg intravenously every 8 hours; levofloxacin 500 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; trovafloxacin 200 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; gatifloxacin 400 mg orally and intravenously every 24 hours; and clinafloxacin 200 mg orally and intravenously every 12 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Free 24-hour areas under the serum concentration-time curves (AUC0-24) were calculated using the trapezoidal rule, and the average AUC0-24:MIC ratio was calculated for each regimen. Differences in ratios among agents were determined by analysis of variance (Scheffe post hoc test, p < 0.05). For intravenous dosing, the average AUC0-24:MIC for gatifloxacin, clinafloxacin, trovafloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin was 146, 142, 122, 71, and 61, respectively. For both oral and intravenous regimens, gatifloxacin and clinafloxacin ratios were significantly greater than those for trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin (p < or = 0.007). Ratios for trovafloxacin were significantly greater than those for levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (p < 0.0001), and levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin ratios were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSION: Gatifloxacin and clinafloxacin achieve significantly higher AUC0-24:MIC ratios for S. pneumoniae than trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Large comparative studies are necessary to determine the clinical significance of these findings.     

Urinary concentrations and bactericidal activities of newer fluoroquinolones in healthy volunteers

Eleven healthy male subjects participated in a crossover study to compare the urine concentrations and bactericidal activities of newer fluoroquinolones against common uropathogens. Each volunteer received a single oral dose of gatifloxacin (400 mg), levofloxacin (250 mg), moxifloxacin (400 mg) and trovafloxacin (200 mg), and a urine sample was obtained at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after the dose. Urine concentrations were highest with gatifloxacin and levofloxacin and lowest with trovafloxacin. Each drug concentration was studied against a levofloxacin susceptible and moderately-susceptible strain of Escherichia coli (minimal inhibitory concentration, MICs: 0.125 and 4 mg/l), K. pneumoniae (MICs: 0.125 and 4 mg/l), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MICs: 0.5 and 4 mg/l) and Enterococcus faecalis (MICs: 0.25 and 4 mg/l). The duration of urine bactericidal activity (UBA) was based upon the median bactericidal titre at each time period. Both gatifloxacin and levofloxacin exhibited prolonged (> or = 6 h) UBA against all of the study isolates. Moxifloxacin exhibited prolonged UBA against both isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae and E. faecalis but not against either strain of P. aeruginosa. Prolonged UBA was not observed for trovafloxacin against the moderately-susceptible strains with the exception of E. faecalis. Furthermore, UBA was not observed for trovafloxacin against the susceptible strain of P. aeruginosa. Although these newer fluoroquinolones exhibited similar in vitro activity against these uropathogens, only those compounds with the highest urinary concentrations (gatifloxacin and levofloxacin) produced prolonged UBA against both strains of P. aeruginosa. The findings from this study suggest that both microbiological activity and urinary concentrations are important parameters to consider when choosing a fluoroquinolone for empirical treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs).     

The comparative activity of twelve 4-quinolone antimicrobials against gram-positive and gram-negative anaerobes

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of twelve 4-quinolone antimicrobials were determined for the Bacteroides fragilis group (50), Bacteroides melaninogenicus (20), Bacteroides bivius (10), Fusobacterium spp. (10), anaerobic Gram-positive cocci (50) and Clostridium spp. (20). MICs were determined using an agar dilution technique in Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 10% lysed horse blood. The inoculum used was approximately 10(4) colony-forming units, contained in 10 microliter of Mueller-Hinton broth, which was applied to the agar plates using a multipoint inoculator. Following inoculation, plates were incubated at 37 degrees C for 48 h in an anaerobic atmosphere. The MIC of each antimicrobial for each isolate examined was determined as the lowest concentration of the antimicrobial which completely inhibited growth of the inoculum. The minimum concentrations required to inhibit the growth of 50% (MIC50) and 90% (MIC90) of the organism examined were also determined. All of the more recently synthesised 4-quinolones showed increased activity against the anaerobic bacteria used in this study. Ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin were the most active compounds examined (Bacteroides fragilis group MIC90 ciprofloxacin 4 micrograms/ml; ofloxacin 4 microgram/ml; Bacteroides melaninogenicus MIC90 ciprofloxacin 2 micrograms/ml, ofloxacin 2 micrograms/ml; Bacteroides bivius MIC90 ciprofloxacin 16 micrograms/ml, ofloxacin 32 micrograms/ml; Fusobacterium spp. MIC90 ciprofloxacin 2 micrograms/ml, ofloxacin 4 micrograms/ml; Clostridium spp. MIC90 ciprofloxacin 1 microgram/ml, ofloxacin 1 microgram/ml and anaerobic Gram-positive cocci MIC90 ciprofloxacin 4 micrograms/ml, ofloxacin 4 micrograms/ml).     

In vitro activities of fourteen antimicrobial agents against obligately anaerobic bacteria

The in vitro activities of fourteen antimicrobial agents were tested against 292 clinical isolates of obligately anaerobic bacteria using the broth microdilution technique. Taking all strains as a group the MIC(50/90) (mg/l) values were metronidazole and imipenem 0.25/1, meropenem 0.25/0.5, trovafloxacin 0.25/1, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin 0.5/2, levofloxacin 2/16, ciprofloxacin 4/32, clindamycin 0.5/8, amoxycillin/clavulanate 1/4, doxycycline and chloramphenicol 2/4, erythromycin 4/>32 and penicillin G 16/>32.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility surveillance of recent isolates from ophthalmological infections to gatifloxacin and other antimicrobial drugs

The antimicrobial susceptibility of 240 isolates from the ophthalmological infections during July 2003 to March 2004 was determined to gatifloxacin (GFLX), levofloxacin, lomefloxacin and cefmenoxime applicable for ophthalmological infections. The in vitro activities of these drugs against the fresh isolates were compared. The quinolones including GFLX were potently active against Gram-positive bacteria, except for MRSA, a major causative pathogens for ophthalmological infection. When MIC ranges, MIC50 and MIC90 of three quinolones were compared, it was considered that the activity of GFLX was the most active of them. GFLX showed to be more active against opportunistic pathogens including Pseudomonas aeruginosa than other antimicrobial agents, and GFLX was especially potent against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Enterococcus faecalis. In conclusion, GFLX exhibits a potently active against fresh isolates from ophthalmological infections, and has an effective potential in the treatment of ophthalmological infections with the drug to administer eye drops.     

Susceptibility to fluoroquinolones among commonly isolated Gram-negative bacilli in 2000: TRUST and TSN data for the United States. Tracking Resistance in the United States Today. The Surveillance Network

From January to May 2000, as part of the Tracking Resistance in the United States Today (TRUST) surveillance initiative, clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n=2519) and non-fermentative Gram-negatives (n=580) were prospectively collected from 26 hospital laboratories across the United States. Isolates were tested for susceptibility to three fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin) and seven other agents. In addition, data for the same period were collected from The Surveillance Network (TSN) Database-USA, an electronic surveillance network that receives data from more than 200 laboratories in the US. Both surveillance methods produced similar results. Against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, imipenem was the most active agent, followed by the fluoroquinolones; > or = 86.7% of isolates of all species of Enterobacteriaceae except Providencia spp. were susceptible to fluoroquinolones by TRUST and TSN surveillance. TRUST identified differences in susceptibility to the three fluoroquinolones of > or = 2% for Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Serratia marcescens. Isolates of P. mirabilis were considerably more susceptible to levofloxacin (94.0%) than to ciprofloxacin (87.7%) and gatifloxacin (87.7%). Other results from TRUST included Pseudomonas aeruginosa being slightly more susceptible to ciprofloxacin (73.5%) and levofloxacin (73.0%) than gatifloxacin (71.0%). Imipenem was the only compound with significant activity (95.1% susceptible, TRUST; 87.4% susceptible, TSN) against Acinetobacter baumannii, but it was inactive against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. S. maltophilia isolates were more susceptible to levofloxacin and gatifloxacin (77.7-79.8%) than ciprofloxacin (29.7-33.0%). Against 513 urinary isolates of Escherichia coli in TRUST, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin were equipotent. Age and gender had no clear effect on the activity of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin or gatifloxacin. Similar results for all three fluoroquinolones were seen in outpatients and inpatients. TRUST and TSN data indicated that resistance rates had not changed appreciably for any compound studied since a similar study conducted in 1999. TRUST centralized in vitro and electronic (TSN) surveillance methods provided an effective strategy for monitoring trends in resistance.