Clinical symptoms, psychopathology and intestinal motility in patients with "irritable bowel"

Recent investigations of pathogenesis of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) either suggested psychopathology as the cause of bowel symptoms or proposed abnormalities in colonic motor and myoelectrical activity. Therefore, we prospectively compared clinical symptoms, personality traits, subjective stress reports, and motor and myoelectrical activity of the sigmoid colon and rectum in patients with IBS, patients with lactose malabsorption (LMA) who had not consulted a doctor for bowel complaints, and normal subjects. It could be shown that neither colonic activity nor stress distinguished patients with IBS from those with LMA. Patients with IBS exhibited significantly more clinical symptoms and psychopathology than patients with LMA and normal subjects. These findings suggest that psychopathology does not cause the symptoms or results from bowel dysfunctions but determines who will consult a doctor for bowel complaints.     

Psychosocial factors in the irritable bowel syndrome. A multivariate study of patients and nonpatients with irritable bowel syndrome

In this multivariate analysis of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) we describe the symptomatic and psychologic features of the condition and their possible contributions to health care seeking. We studied 72 IBS patients, 82 persons with IBS who had not sought medical treatment, and 84 normal subjects. All subjects received complete medical evaluation, diary card assessment of abdominal pain and stool habit, and standard psychologic tests of pain, personality, mood, stressful life events, illness behavior, and social support. Pain and diarrhea were the most important symptoms associated with patient status. When controlling for these symptoms we found that (a) IBS patients have a higher proportion of abnormal personality patterns, greater illness behaviors, and lower positive stressful life event scores than IBS nonpatients (p less than 0.001) and normals (p less than 0.001); (b) IBS nonpatients, although psychologically intermediate between patients and normals, are not different from normals (p less than 0.21); and (c) IBS nonpatients have higher coping capabilities, experience illness as less disruptive to life, and tend to exhibit less psychologic denial than patients. These factors may contribute to "wellness behaviors" among people with chronic bowel symptoms. We conclude that the psychologic factors previously attributed to the IBS are associated with patient status rather than to the disorder per se. These factors may interact with physiologic disturbances in the bowel to determine how the illness is experienced and acted upon.     

Psychologic Therapies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Opinion statement The treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a difficult task, as the results from therapy with pharmacologic agents have been disappointing. Psychologic treatments, in particular cognitive behavior therapy, hypnotherapy, and dynamic psychotherapy have all shown to be effective in the treatment of patients with IBS. Underpinning all these treatments is a clear understanding of a biopsychosocial model of interaction between emotion and gut function in IBS. These psychologic therapies are intended to break the negative feedback loop between emotion and gut function in order to reduce symptoms. Attention to the psychologic issues underlying IBS helps reduce psychosocial factors that maintain the presence of symptoms and inappropriate health-care seeking behavior. There are a number of common elements in the psychologic approaches that can be used in routine clinical practice; these include a detailed assessment, psychoeducation, support, and reassurance.     

Effects of acute psychologic stress on small-intestinal motility in health and the irritable bowel syndrome.

Psychologic stress may be a provoking factor in the alterations in phase-2 motor activity of the migrating motor complex (MMC) which have been recorded in patients with the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). To test this, changes in phase-2 duodenojejunal motor activity during 20 min of psychologic stress in 10 patients with IBS were compared with those shown by 10 healthy subjects. Autonomic arousal in response to the stressor was assessed by cardiovascular responses and self-reported levels of anxiety and tension. IBS and controls showed a significant cardiovascular and subjective response to stress which was comparable in the two groups. In general, duodenal phase-2 motor activity was suppressed during stress in both IBS and controls. Jejunal motor activity showed a similar inhibitory response in both groups, but the change in motility index was significant for controls only. Qualitatively, stress did not cause clustered contractions in either the IBS or the control group. However, in IBS patients with clustered contractions in the basal period there was inhibition of this pattern during stress. These findings suggest that acute psychologic stress profoundly suppresses, rather than enhances, duodenojejunal MMC phase-2 motility in healthy subjects. IBS patients, irrespective of their underlying phase-2 motor pattern show similar, although less marked, changes in motility.     

New concepts of irritable bowel syndrome

Significant recent advances in basic and clinical science have improved our understanding of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Sensory abnormalities, particularly visceral hypersensitivity after sensitizing stimulation, indicate neural dysfunction in patients with IBS. This dysfunction could be mediated by N-methyl-D-aspartate or calcium gene-related peptide receptors in the spinal cord. The stress response in the gut is augmented in IBS, which may be related to hypothalamic release of corticotropin-releasing factor. Postinfectious IBS may be related to psychologic factors that allow persistent inflammation. Finally, functional brain imaging has shown augmented central nervous system responses to visceral pain in IBS, particularly in the prefrontal cortex. Low-dose tricyclic antidepressants are useful to control symptoms, and the new serotonin type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists show promise for symptom control.     

Relationship of functional gastrointestinal disorders and psychiatric disorders： Implications for treatment

This article revisits the links between psychopathology and functional gastrointestinal disorders such as irritable bowel syndrome （IBS）, discusses the rational use of antidepressants as well as non-pharmacological approaches to the management of IBS, and suggests guidelines for the treatment of IBS based on an interdisciplinary perspective from the present state of knowledge. Relevant published literature on psychiatric disorders, especially somatization disorder, in the context of [BS, and literature providing direction for management is reviewed, and new directions are provided from findings in the literature. IBS is a heterogeneous syndrome with various potential mechanisms responsible for its clinical presentations. IBS is typically complicated with psychiatric issues, unexplained symptoms, and functional syndromes in other organ systems. Most IBS patients have multiple complaints without demonstrated cause, and that these symptoms can involve systems other than the intestine, e.g. bones and joints （fibromyalgia, temporomandibular joint syndrome）, heart （non-cardiac chest pain）, vascular （post-menopausal syndrome）, and brain （anxiety, depression）. Host IBS patients do not have psychiatric illness per se, but a range of psychoform （psychological complaints in the absence of psychiatric disorder） symptoms that accompany their somatoform （physical symptoms in the absence of medical disorder） complaints. It is not correct to label IBS patients as psychiatric patients （except those more difficult patients with true somatization disorder）. One mode of treatment is unlikely to be universally effective or to resolve most symptoms. The techniques of psychotherapy or cognitive-behavioral therapy can allow IBS patients to cope more readily with their illness. Specific episodes of depressive or anxiety disorders can be managed as appropriate for those conditions. Medications designed to improve anxiety or depression are not uniformly useful for psychiatric complaints in IBS, because the p     

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine does not change rectal sensitivity and symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although widely prescribed, the evidence for the use of antidepressants for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is limited. In this study, we hypothesized that fluoxetine (Prozac), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, has visceral analgesic properties, leading to increased sensory thresholds during rectal distention and improvement of symptoms, in particular in IBS patients with visceral hypersensitivity. METHODS: Forty non-depressed IBS patients underwent a rectal barostat study to assess the sensitivity to rectal distention before and after 6 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg or placebo. Abdominal pain scores, individual gastrointestinal symptoms, global symptom relief, and psychologic symptoms were assessed before and after the intervention. RESULTS: At baseline, 21 of 40 patients showed hypersensitivity to rectal distention. Fluoxetine did not significantly alter the threshold for discomfort/pain relative to placebo, either in hypersensitive (19 +/- 3 vs. 22 +/- 2 mm Hg above MDP) or in normosensitive (34 +/- 2 vs. 39 +/- 4 mm Hg above MDP) IBS patients. Overall, 53% of fluoxetine-treated patients and 76% of placebo-treated patients reported significant abdominal pain scores after 6 weeks (not significant). In contrast, in hypersensitive patients only, fluoxetine significantly reduced the number of patients reporting significant abdominal pain. Gastrointestinal symptoms, global symptom relief, and psychologic symptoms were not altered. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoxetine does not change rectal sensitivity in IBS patients. Possible beneficial effects on pain perception need to be confirmed in larger trials.     

Diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome: poor agreement between general practitioners and the Rome II criteria

Background: The new guidelines for diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in clinical practice recommend the use of the Rome II criteria. In this study the agreement between general practitioners (GPs) and the Rome II criteria for diagnosing of IBS and functional bowel disorders (FBD) is examined. Methods: Consecutive patients in general practice were asked to report on abdominal complaints, for which they had consulted or wanted to consult a GP. Patients with such complaints completed a questionnaire based on the Rome II criteria for FBD. After consultations, the GPs reported their diagnoses on the abdominal complaints. Results: Of 3097 screened patients, 553 patients were diagnosed by their GP and had complete data in the questionnaire. Of these patients, 107 had IBS according to the GPs and 209 had IBS according to the Rome II criteria (agreement 58%, kappa 0.01 (CI: ?0.06; 0.09)). Agreement on IBS and FBD in patients without organic disease, without reflux or dyspepsia and in patients with a verified diagnosis was 45%–58%, with kappa values from ?0.02 to 0.13. IBS and FBD cases were diagnosed by the Rome II criteria more often than by the GPs in all these groups of patients (P?Conclusions: This study shows poor agreement in the diagnosis of IBS between GPs and the Rome II criteria. Therefore, current knowledge about IBS based on strict criteria is not necessarily transferable to patients with IBS in general practice.     

Psychological factors in the irritable bowel syndrome.

This paper reviews recent psychological studies of patients with the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or 'functional abdominal pain'. Many studies have used unreliable or invalid methods of assessment and some have confused personality with treatable psychiatric illness. Reliable and valid measures have indicated that 40-50% of patients with recently diagnosed functional abdominal pain have demonstrable psychiatric illness; these patients have a worse prognosis than those who are psychologically normal. When psychiatric disorder is diagnosed in a patient with IBS there are three possibilities: (1) The patient may have developed abdominal and psychiatric symptoms simultaneously in which case treatment of the latter may relieve the bowel symptoms. (2) Psychiatric disorder may precipitate increased concern about bowel symptoms, and consequent attendance at the gastroenterology clinic, of those with chronic mild symptoms. In this case it is illness behaviour, rather than abdominal symptoms, that is caused by the anxiety/depression. (3) Those with chronic neurotic symptoms as part of their personality must be screened for organic disease if they have a fresh onset of bowel symptoms; but they are at high risk of becoming persistent clinic attenders. Further research is needed to clarify when psychological abnormalities play a role in the aetiology of IBS and when they are coincidental, but lead to illness behaviour. The role of psychological factors in the aetiology of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is far from clear, but a review of the literature suggests that some consistent patterns are emerging in spite of methodological problems. There have been three major defects with studies that have linked IBS with neurotic symptomatology. First, the measurement of psychological factors has generally been imprecise. Second, most studies have considered IBS patients as a single group, without making allowance for differing symptom patterns. Third, conclusions have been drawn about hospital samples and extrapolated to all IBS subjects, without taking account of factors which affect consulting behaviour. Most studies have been concerned with psychological factors so these will be considered in most detail.     

Symptoms of psychologic distress associated with irritable bowel syndrome. Comparison of community and medical clinic samples

Women with symptoms indicative of irritable bowel syndrome who had not consulted a physician were compared with female patients at a gastroenterology clinic to investigate whether self-selection for treatment accounts for psychologic abnormalities in clinic patients' with irritable bowel syndrome. Two sets of diagnostic criteria were compared: restrictive criteria based on the work of Manning and conventional criteria (abdominal pain plus altered bowel habits). Lactose malabsorbers were included as a control group because they have medically explained bowel symptoms similar to those that define irritable bowel syndrome. Thus they control for the causative effects of chronic bowel symptoms on psychologic distress. Women who met restrictive criteria for irritable bowel syndrome but had not consulted a physician had no more symptoms of psychologic distress on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist than asymptomatic controls. However, medical clinic patients with both irritable bowel syndrome and lactose malabsorption had significantly more psychologic symptoms than asymptomatic controls or nonconsulters with the same diagnoses. Individuals who met only the conventional criteria for irritable bowel syndrome reported more psychologic distress than controls, whether or not they consulted a physician. These results suggest that (a) symptoms of psychologic distress are unrelated to irritable bowel syndrome but influence which patients consult a doctor and (b) conventional diagnostic criteria identify more psychologically distressed individuals than do restrictive criteria.     

A population study on irritable bowel syndrome and mental health

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is commonly thought to be associated with psychologic distress. However, in some studies only persons who had sought medical care for IBS (IBS patients) showed an increased frequency of psychiatric symptoms, and nonpatients did not differ significantly from normal subjects. Our aims were 1) to estimate the prevalence of IBS in the population aged 18-45 years, 2) to find the proportion seeking medical care for IBS, and 3) to compare IBS subjects with normals, and IBS patients with IBS nonpatients with regard to mental health. METHODS: Questionnaires on IBS symptoms and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) were mailed to 5000 randomly sampled persons aged 18-45 years. The response rate was 58%. RESULTS: IBS was found in 7.4% of the men and 13.3% of the women. Those who had sought medical attention had more severe symptoms. The Likert mean score on the GHQ was 4.7 (95% confidence interval, 4.4-5.0) points higher for the IBS group than for normals (P < 0.001). There was no difference in GHQ scores between IBS patients and nonpatients. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that IBS per se is associated with more psychiatric distress, regardless of medical care-seeking. Seeking medical care is associated with more severe IBS symptoms.     

A Population Study on Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Mental Health

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is commonly thought to be associated with psychologic distress. However, in some studies only persons who had sought medical care for IBS (IBS patients) showed an increased frequency of psychiatric symptoms, and nonpatients did not differ significantly from normal subjects. Our aims were 1) to estimate the prevalence of IBS in the population aged 18-45 years, 2) to find the proportion seeking medical care for IBS, and 3) to compare IBS subjects with normals, and IBS patients with IBS nonpatients with regard to mental health. Methods: Questionnaires on IBS symptoms and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) were mailed to 5000 randomly sampled persons aged 18-45 years. The response rate was 58%. Results: IBS was found in 7.4% of the men and 13.3% of the women. Those who had sought medical attention had more severe symptoms. The Likert mean score on the GHQ was 4.7 (95% confidence interval, 4.4-5.0) points higher for the IBS group than for normals (P &lt; 0.001). There was no difference in GHQ scores between IBS patients and nonpatients. Conclusions: The results indicate that IBS per se is associated with more psychiatric distress, regardless of medical care-seeking. Seeking medical care is associated with more severe IBS symptoms.     

Impact of psychological stress on irritable bowel syndrome

Psychological stress is an important factor for the development of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). More and more clinical and experimental evidence showed that IBS is a combination of irritable bowel and irritable brain. In the present review we discuss the potential role of psychological stress in the pathogenesis of IBS and provide comprehensive approaches in clinical treatment. Evidence from clinical and experimental studies showed that psychological stresses have marked impact on intestinal sensitivity, motility, secretion and permeability, and the underlying mechanism has a close correlation with mucosal immune activation, alterations in central nervous system, peripheral neurons and gastrointestinal microbiota. Stress-induced alterations in neuro-endocrine-immune pathways acts on the gut-brain axis and microbiota-gut-brain axis, and cause symptom flare-ups or exaggeration in IBS. IBS is a stress-sensitive disorder, therefore, the treatment of IBS should focus on managing stress and stress-induced responses. Now, non-pharmacological approaches and pharmacological strategies that target on stress-related alterations, such as antidepressants, antipsychotics, miscellaneous agents, 5-HT synthesis inhibitors, selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, and specific 5-HT receptor antagonists or agonists have shown a critical role in IBS management. A integrative approach for IBS management is a necessary.     

Irritable bowel syndrome: evaluation and treatment

Irritable bowel syndrome is a common gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, and disturbed defecation in the absence of other medical conditions with similar presentations. Because physical findings and currently available diagnostic tests lack sufficient specificity for clinical use, the diagnosis of IBS is based on characteristic symptoms as outlined in several symptom-based criteria for IBS. When used in combination with a detailed history, physical examination, and limited diagnostic testing, these criteria are a valid method of diagnosing IBS. Once a confident diagnosis of IBS has been made, treatment of IBS should be based on the predominant symptom while taking into account the severity of symptoms and the degree of functional impairment both physically and psychologically. Most patients with IBS have mild symptoms and education, reassurance, dietary and lifestyle changes, and a therapeutic physician-patient relationship form the backbone of treatment. A smaller number of patients have moderate symptoms, which are typically intermittent, but may at times interrupt their normal activities. In addition to dietary and lifestyle modifications, pharmacologic intervention based on the predominant symptom (diarrhea, constipation, or pain) may be used to relieve symptoms. Finally, a small subset of patients has severe or intractable symptoms. These patients, often seen in tertiary referral centers, often have constant pain symptoms and psychosocial impairments. A multidisciplinary approach including pharmacologic treatments, psychologic treatments, and possibly a mental health or pain center involvement may be beneficial.     

Recollection of childhood events in adults with irritable bowel syndrome

We examined retrospectively premorbid factors that might relate to the development of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We administered a semistructural interview to adult IBS patients, adults with symptoms of IBS who had not visited a doctor (nonpatients), and asymptomatic normals. Patients with IBS differed from nonpatients by reporting more severe bowel problems, more frequent doctor visits in childhood, and more pain associated with current bowel symptoms. These factors may contribute to the tendency of people with bowel symptoms to seek medical care. More patients, and in most cases nonpatients with IBS, reported poorer general health and headaches, stomachaches, and bowel complaints during childhood. They also showed evidence for greater parental attention to illness with more frequent school absences and doctor visits than normal subjects. Loss and separation during childhood, and in the current family, and conflicted or dependent maternal relationships were also more frequently reported among patients and nonpatients. These factors may contribute to the development of IBS.     

Efficacy of current drug therapies in irritable bowel syndrome: what works and does not work

Based on current evidence, bulking agents are not more effective than placebo at improving global irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)symptoms, although they may increase stool frequency in large doses. Tricyclic antidepressants are more effective than placebo for patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS. Imodium is more effective than placebo at improving stool consistency and decreasing stool frequency in patients with IBS, and it may be an important component for treating diarrhea-predominant IBS. Antispasmodics agents available in the United States are not more effective than placebo for treating IBS, although the studies are small and poorly designed. There are no randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of laxatives for managing IBS. Tegaserod is more effective than placebo at improving global IBS symptoms in women with nondiarrhea-predominant IBS. Alosetron is more effective than placebo in women with diarrhea-predominant IBS, although its use should be limited to patients who have failed conventional therapy because of its adverse event profile.     

Cognitive-behavioral therapy for the management of irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome(IBS)is a common disorder,reported to be found in 5%-20%of the general population.Its management accounts for up to 25%of a gastroenterologist’s workload in the outpatient department,and the main symptoms are abdominal pain,bloating,and altered bowel habits.Despite a great amount of available pharmacological treatments aimed at a wide variety of gastrointestinal and brain targets,many patients have not shown adequate symptom relief.In recent years,there has been increasing evidence to suggest that psychological treatments,in particular cognitive-behavioral therapy(CBT),are effective for the management of IBS.This review discusses CBT for the management of IBS.CBT has proved to be effective in alleviating the physical and psychological symptoms of IBS and has thus been recommended as a treatment option for the syndrome.     

Splitting irritable bowel syndrome: from original Rome to Rome II criteria

OBJECTIVES: Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other functional bowel disorders (FBD) is based on symptom evaluation. Clinical criteria have changed over time, yielding different proportions of subjects fulfilling diagnostic requirements. According to new diagnostic criteria (Rome II), subjects considered some years ago to have IBS no longer do so. The aim of this article is to evaluate how patients diagnosed as having IBS according to original Rome criteria have been split, and to which clinical diagnosis they belong today. METHODS: Two hundred and eleven subjects meeting original Rome IBS diagnostic criteria were studied: 65 also met Rome II criteria while 146 did not. Subjects were extracted from an epidemiological survey, using home-based personal interviews, on 2000 subjects randomly selected as representative of the Spanish population. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were compared. RESULTS: Of the subjects meeting original Rome but not Rome II criteria, the present diagnosis should be: 40%"minor" IBS (IBS symptoms of less than 12 wk duration), 37% functional constipation, 12% alternating bowel habit, 7% functional diarrhea, 3% functional abdominal bloating, and 1% unspecified functional bowel disorder (FBD). Thus, 52 subjects (36%) should not be diagnosed with IBS because they really had other FBD, 59 (40%) because of symptoms consistent with IBD diagnosis but not the required duration or frequency, and 35 (24%) because of symptoms consistent with some other FBD diagnosis but not meeting the required duration. Clinical complaints, personal well-being, resource utilization, and HRQOL were more severely affected in IBS than in other FBD as a group, and in "major" rather than in "minor" forms. CONCLUSIONS: Many subjects meeting original Rome criteria for IBS do not meet Rome II criteria: approximately one quarter of subjects do not have sufficient symptom duration or frequency to be diagnosed with IBS and almost half are now considered as having other ("major" or "minor") FBD.     

Diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome: poor agreement between general practitioners and the Rome II criteria

BACKGROUND: The new guidelines for diagnosing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in clinical practice recommend the use of the Rome II criteria. In this study the agreement between general practitioners (GPs) and the Rome II criteria for diagnosing of IBS and functional bowel disorders (FBD) is examined. METHODS: Consecutive patients in general practice were asked to report on abdominal complaints, for which they had consulted or wanted to consult a GP. Patients with such complaints completed a questionnaire based on the Rome II criteria for FBD. After consultations, the GPs reported their diagnoses on the abdominal complaints. RESULTS: Of 3097 screened patients, 553 patients were diagnosed by their GP and had complete data in the questionnaire. Of these patients, 107 had IBS according to the GPs and 209 had IBS according to the Rome II criteria (agreement 58%, kappa 0.01 (CI: -0.06; 0.09)). Agreement on IBS and FBD in patients without organic disease, without reflux or dyspepsia and in patients with a verified diagnosis was 45%-58%, with kappa values from -0.02 to 0.13. IBS and FBD cases were diagnosed by the Rome II criteria more often than by the GPs in all these groups of patients (P < 0.001). In patients with diagnostic discrepancies concerning IBS, 'stress-related symptoms' was predictive of a diagnosis of IBS made by the GPs only (OR 2.17 (CI: 1.1; 4.2)). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows poor agreement in the diagnosis of IBS between GPs and the Rome II criteria. Therefore, current knowledge about IBS based on strict criteria is not necessarily transferable to patients with IBS in general practice.     

Reizdarmsyndrom

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) represents a common, functional gastrointestinal disorder. Predominant symptoms are pain, flatulence, constipation, diarrhea, meteorism and abdominal distension. The diagnosis is made by exclusion of relevant differential diagnoses. Patients are categorized according to defecation problems into diarrhea predominant, constipation predominant and alternating mixed stool behavior. To date, several pathomechanisms of IBS are under discussion. Owing to its heterogeneity, no standard therapy is available and current therapeutic approaches focus on the main symptoms. Dietary fibre, laxatives, spasmolytics, antidepressants, hypnotherapy/psychotherapy and also antibiotics have been reported to be beneficial in the treatment of IBS. Recently, evidence has accumulated that probiotics represent a useful therapeutic approach in the treatment of IBS although effects are strain-specific and individual and cannot be generally assigned to all patients.