9:45-10:00. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is Superior to Computerized Tomography (CT) for Metastatic Staging in Melanoma Patients

PET provides diagnostic information currently not available with traditional imaging. Retrospective analysis was performed of 104 patients with primary or recurrent melanoma who underwent PET for staging to determine sensitivity/specificity compared to body CT. 157 PET and 70 CT scans were analyzed with a mean follow up of 26 months. Metastatic events were confirmed with positive histology (73%) or documented disease progression.PET demonstrated 86% sensitivity and 97% specificity in 41 patients with metastasis. CT showed 57% sensitivity and 70% specificity in 30 patients with metastasis. Exclusion of areas not evaluated on CT (head, neck/supraclavicular, and extremities) increased CT sensitivity to 68%. Fifty-three patients underwent 67 consecutive CT and PET scans that detected 132 metastases in 30 individuals. PET detected a greater percentage of metastases (83%) compared to CT (56%), and specifically, in the soft tissue, neck, peripheral/mediastinal/intraabdominal lymph nodes, and small bowel. PET detected 100% of mediastinal metastasis while CT detected only 67%. Surprisingly, PET detected 84% of lung parenchymal metastasis compared to 72% with CT.PET is more sensitive and specific than CT for detection of melanoma metastasis and should be considered the primary staging study upon suspicion of recurrent disease. PET shows greater ability to detect soft tissue, small bowel, and lymph node metastasis that do not meet criteria designated as abnormal by CT. Likewise, CT does not routinely evaluate the supraclavicular area, neck, or upper/lower extremities. However, even when these sites are excluded from comparative analysis, PET is superior to CT in detecting melanoma metastasis.     

Chemotherapy response assessment in stage IV melanoma patients—comparison of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG-PET/CT,CT, brain MRI,and tumormarker S-100B

PURPOSE: This study aims to compare the use of 18F-FDG-PET/CT, CT, brain MRI, and tumormarker S-100B in chemotherapy response assessment of stage IV melanoma patients. METHODS: In 25 patients with stage IV melanoma, FDG-PET/CT and S-100B after 2-3 months (three cycles) of chemotherapy was compared with baseline PET/CT and baseline S-100B. Retrospectively, the response was correlated with the outcome. In patients with clinical suspicion for brain metastases, MRI or CCT was performed. RESULTS: There was agreement between FDG-PET/CT and CT regarding response to chemotherapy in all patients. There was a clear trend to a longer OS of PET/CT responders (n=10) compared with PET/CT non-responders (n=15; p=0.072) with remarkably better 1-year OS of 80% compared to 40% (p=0.048). There was a significant longer PFS of PET/CT responders compared with PET/CT non-responders (p=0.002). S-100B was normal at baseline in eight of 22 patients where it was available. Chemotherapy response assessment with S-100B failed to show correlation with OS or PFS. Eleven patients developed brain metastases during treatment, first detected by PET/CT in two and by MRI or CCT in nine of 11 patients. Appearance of brain metastases was associated with a poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: 18F-FDG-PET/CT and CT alone are equally suitable for chemotherapy response assessment in melanoma patients and clearly superior to S-100B. PET/CT responders have better early survival, but this is shortlived due to late therapy failure--often with brain recurrence. Additional brain MRI for therapy response assessment in such high-risk patients is mandatory to detect brain metastases missed by PET/CT.     

High-risk melanoma: accuracy of FDG PET/CT with added CT morphologic information for detection of metastases

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) with added CT morphologic information for depiction of metastases in patients with high-risk melanoma and negative findings for metastases at PET, by using histologic findings or additional imaging and/or follow-up findings as reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained. Informed consent was obtained from patients. One hundred twenty-four consecutive high-risk melanoma patients (65 female, 59 male; mean age, 54.4 years; range, 15-82 years) were included. Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT was performed. First, PET/CT scans were evaluated for presence of metastases with increased FDG uptake; CT anatomic location was determined. Lesions were considered metastases if there was focal uptake higher than that of background tissue. Second, coregistered CT images of combined PET/CT scans were evaluated for presence of lesions without FDG uptake. Findings were compared with reference standard findings to determine the accuracy of each evaluation. McNemar test was used to assess statistical differences in accuracy. RESULTS: In 53 of 124 patients, metastases were found. In 46 of 53 patients with metastases, lesions had increased FDG uptake. In seven patients with metastatic disease, metastases did not have increased FDG uptake (maximum standard uptake value [SUV], <1.5; n = 5) or had faint FDG uptake (maximum SUV, 2.5 and 2.9; n = 2)-findings that were inconclusive with PET alone. These lesions were interpreted as metastases only with coregistered CT images. Lesions missed with PET were located in the lungs, iliac lymph nodes, subcutis, and psoas muscle. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively, of PET/CT for depiction of metastases were 85%, 96%, and 91%, and those of PET/CT with dedicated CT interpretation were 98%, 94%, and 96% (P = .016). CONCLUSION: Dedicated analysis of coregistered CT images significantly improves the accuracy of integrated PET/CT for depiction of metastases in patients with high-risk melanoma.     

Association between number and sites of new bone scan abnormalities and presence of skeletal metastases in patients with breast cancer

Review of 1,441 bone scans performed on 242 breast cancer patients without known skeletal metastases identified 239 scans with new abnormalities. Findings on 54 of these 239 scans (23%) represented bone metastases. The proportion of scans reflecting metastases, grouped by the number of new abnormalities, was: (1) 20/182 (11%); (2) 9/26 (35%); (3) 4/9 (45%); (4) 1/2 (50%); greater than or equal to 5-20/20 (100%). When metastatic disease presented as a bone scan with 1-4 new abnormalities, the spine was the most common site of involvement (18 of 34 (53%)), followed by the skull (5/34; 15%), extremities and sternum (each 4/34; 12%). Rib lesions were the most common new findings on scans with less than 5 new abnormalities (seen on 76 of 219 scans (35%)) but only infrequently represented metastases (n = 2). Considering as indicative of malignancy only, those bone scans which demonstrated either (a) greater than or equal to 5 new abnormalities, (b) initial radiographic correlation suggestive of metastases, or (c) thoracic spine lesions with normal correlative radiographs, the presence of skeletal metastatic disease could be predicted with a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.94.     

The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma at diagnosis

The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of whole-body (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT alters staging and management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) when compared with current staging practice. 52 patients with Stage III-IV NPC without distant metastases on chest X-ray/CT, abdominal ultrasound or bone scan were recruited for the study. Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the head and neck were performed. The scans were compared for extent of the primary tumour (PT), cervical nodal metastases (CNM) and distant metastases (DM). Any discordance in results was assessed with respect to staging and impact on management. MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans were discordant in 28 (54%) patients. There was discordance in the extent of PT at 28 sites; in all sites, MRI showed more extensive tumour involving the nasopharynx (n = 8), skull base (n = 14), brain (n = 4) and orbit (n = 2). There was also variation among the extent of CNM in four nodes of the retropharyngeal region, with the nodes being positive on MRI. (18)F-FDG PET /CT did not identify any additional distant metastases but did identify a second primary tumour in the colon. The additional use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT did not "up-stage" the overall stage or change management in any patient. In conclusion, there is discordance between MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and the additional use of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the current assessment of NPC at diagnosis does not appear to be justified in this cohort of patients.     

18 F-FDG PET显像对致痫灶的定位诊断价值

目的　探讨 18F -脱氧葡萄糖 (FDG)PET显像对癫痫灶的定位诊断价值。方法　难治性癫痫患者 2 2例 ,男 15例 ,女 7例 ,平均年龄 19.0岁 ,平均病程 8.2年。所有患者均进行常规 18F -FDGPET显像 ,结合脑电图 (EEG)及MRI、CT对 2 1例患者进行开颅手术 ,术中在皮层脑电图 (EcoG)监测下行致痫灶切除术 ,并送病理学检查 ;另 1例进行立体定向杏仁、海马损毁术。所有患者术后随访疗效。结果　 2 2例癫痫患者中 ,2 1例 18F -FDGPET显像阳性 (95 .5 % ) ,2 0例表现为发作间期低代谢灶 ,1例为发作期高代谢灶 ;EEG检查阳性 17例 (77.3 % ) ,其中 8例无定位意义 ;CT、MRI阳性者 5例 (2 2 .7% ) ;18F -FDGPET定位的致痫灶与EcoG一致的有 18例 (85 .7% ) ,不完全一致的 2例 ,不一致的 1例 ;18F -FDGPET显像阳性 19例中 ,18例手术病理异常 (94.7% ) ,PET阴性的 1例手术病理为正常脑组织 ;开颅手术治疗后 ,癫痫发作完全消失者 9例 (4 2 .9% ) ,癫痫发作次数减少 5 0 %以上者 9例 (4 2 .9% ) ,发作次数无明显变化 3例 (14 .3 % ) ;另 1例进行立体定向杏仁海马损毁术的患者癫痫发作次数无明显变化。结论　18F -FDGPET显像对致痫灶的定位诊断灵敏、准确 ,对指导癫痫外科手术有重要的临床价值     

Is 18F-FDG PET more accurate than standard diagnostic procedures in the detection of suspected recurrent melanoma?

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET in detecting recurrent melanoma. METHODS: PET findings were compared with those obtained by standard diagnostic clinical procedures (CP) to establish the role of PET in the management of patients with melanoma. From 156 patients with confirmed melanoma and recurrence suspected by clinical examination, 184 PET scans were retrospectively reviewed. Histology or clinical follow-up was used for final diagnosis. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of PET for detecting lesions on an individual-patient basis were 74% and 86%, respectively, compared with respective values of 58% and 45% for CP alone. The overall accuracy for PET was 81%, compared with 52% for other methods. PET was more accurate (91% vs. 67%) than CP in detecting locoregional disease and distant metastases (85% vs. 55%), and PET results led to a change in the planned clinical management of 36% of patients included in this study. PET was more accurate than CT in detecting skin lesions, malignant lymph nodes, and metastases to the abdomen, liver, and bone. In the assessment of pulmonary disease, PET showed higher specificity (92% vs. 70%) than CT for the detection of lung parenchyma lesions; however, the sensitivity was better for CT (93%) than for PET (57%). CONCLUSION: PET is better than CP in detecting locoregional disease and distant metastases in all sites except the lung, where it appears to be a useful adjunct to CT. The use of PET as a routine clinical tool can lead to a substantial change in the clinical management of suspected recurrent melanoma.     

Tumour assessment in advanced melanoma: value of FDG-PET/CT in patients with elevated serum S-100B

Purpose To evaluate the usefulness of PET/CT in melanoma patients with an elevated serum S-100B tumour marker level. Methods Out of 165 consecutive high-risk melanoma patients referred for PET/CT imaging, 47 had elevated (>0.2 μg/l) S-100B serum levels and a contemporaneous ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan. PET/CT scans were evaluated for the presence of metastases. To produce a composite reference standard, we used cytological, histological, MRI and PET/CT follow-up findings as well as clinical and S-100B follow-up. Results Among the 47 patients with increased S-100B levels, PET/CT correctly identified metastases in 38 (30 distant metastases and eight lymph node metastases). In one patient with cervical lymph node metastases, PET/CT was negative. Eight patients had no metastases and PET/CT correctly excluded metastases in all of them. Overall sensitivity for metastases was 97% (38/39), specificity 100% (8/8) and accuracy 98% (46/47). S-100B was significantly higher in patients with distant metastases (mean 1.93 μg/l, range 0.3–14.3 μg/l) than in patients with lymph node metastases (mean 0.49 μg/l, range 0.3–1.6 μg/l, p = 0.003) or patients without metastases (mean 0.625 μg/l, range 0.3–2.6 μg/l, p = 0.007). However, 6 of 14 patients with a tumour marker level of 0.3 μg/l had no metastases. Conclusion In melanoma patients with elevated S-100B tumour marker levels, FDG-PET/CT accurately identifies lymph node or distant metastases and reliably excludes metastases. Because of the significant number of false positive S-100B tumour marker determinations (17%), we recommend repetition of tumour marker measurements if elevated S-100B levels occur before extensive imaging is used.     

Bone scans with one or two new abnormalities in cancer patients with no known metastases: frequency and serial scintigraphic behavior of benign and malignant lesions

Scintigraphic, radiologic, and clinical follow-up findings were reviewed in cases in which bone scans (n = 301) showed one or two new abnormalities in patients with malignancy but no known metastases. Metastatic disease was confirmed for 25 of 231 scans (11%) with one new abnormality and for 17 of 70 scans (24%) with two new abnormalities. The prevalence of metastases was 0.06 to 0.13 for lesions in all regions of the skeleton, except the sternum (three of six) and the pelvis (10 of 32). On follow-up scans, in the absence of an interval change in therapy, 19 of 21 metastases became more intense, whereas most benign abnormalities either remained unchanged (47%) or resolved (41%). Benign lesions in the ribs, extremities, and pelvis generally resolved within 12-24 months, while most benign skull and spine abnormalities were still apparent after 35-58 months of follow-up.     

Optimized contrast-enhanced CT protocols for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: technical aspects of single-phase versus multiphase CT imaging.

The purpose of this study was to compare various PET/CT examination protocols that use contrast-enhanced single-phase or contrast-enhanced multiphase CT scans under different breathing conditions. METHODS: Sixty patients with different malignant tumors were randomized into 4 different PET/CT protocols. Single-phase protocols included an intravenous contrast-enhanced (Ultravist 370; iodine at 370 mg/mL) single-phase whole-body CT scan (90 mL at 1.8 mL/min; delay, 90 s) during shallow breathing (protocol A) or during normal expiration (NormExp; protocol B). Multiphase protocols included 2 separate CT scans in the arterial contrast enhancement phase (90 mL at 2.5-2.8 mL/min; bolus tracking; scan range, base of the skull to the kidneys) and the portal-venous contrast enhancement phase (delay, 90 s; scan range, base of the lungs to the proximal thighs) during shallow breathing (protocol C) or during NormExp (protocol D) followed by a low-dose CT scan during shallow breathing for attenuation correction and whole-body PET. Feasibility was assessed by comparing the misalignment of the upper abdominal organs quantitatively by means of the craniocaudal, lateral, and anterior-posterior differences on coregistered PET/CT images. For image quality, the occurrence of CT artifacts and mismatching of rigid body points were evaluated qualitatively. RESULTS: Misalignment was significantly lower for protocol B in almost all organs and represented the best coregistration quality. Surprisingly, protocol A showed significantly better alignment than the multiphase CT scans during NormExp. Misalignment values between the multiphase protocols were not significantly different, with a trend toward lower values for protocol D. The best CT image quality, with a significantly lower occurrence of artifacts, was found for protocols B and D (NormExp). The levels of mismatching of rigid body points because of patient movement in between the transmission and emission scans were similar for all protocols. CONCLUSION: Multiphase CT protocols presented a technical disadvantage represented by suboptimal image coregistration compared with single-phase protocols. Nevertheless, multiphase protocols are technically feasible and should be considered for patients who will benefit from a contrast-enhanced multiphase CT examination for diagnosis.     

Prevalence and patterns of bone metastases detected with positron emission tomography using F-18 FDG

PURPOSE: The aim of this retrospective study was to report the prevalence and imaging characteristics of bone metastases detected with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and, when possible, compare these findings with the performance of bone scans in the same patients. METHODS: The reports of 403 patients with histologically proved malignant disease who underwent a PET scan for initial or post-therapeutic staging were reviewed for the presence of possible bone metastases. Based on the final diagnosis confirmed by histopathologic analysis or clinical follow-up, the PET findings of patients with positive bone metastases were evaluated in terms of location, intensity, and patterns. When the PET scan was positive, the PET results were compared with the findings of available bone scans. RESULTS: PET studies suggested the presence of bone metastases in 38 patients (9%). No follow-up data were available for 9 patients, and the remaining 29 were evaluated further. Of these patients, 6 had false-positive findings, whereas bone metastatic involvement was clinically confirmed in 23 patients. The primary malignant findings included lung cancer (n = 9), esophageal cancer (n = 3), lymphoma (n = 2), melanoma (n = 2), thyroid cancer (n = 2), breast cancer (n = 1), colon cancer (n = 1), prostate cancer (n = 1), testicular cancer (n = 1), and nasopharyngeal cancer (n = 1). On PET, 5 patients had a solitary metastatic focus (22%), and the remaining 18 patients had multiple lesions (78%). The vertebrae were the most frequently involved bones (74%), followed by pelvic bones (70%), ribs (65%), upper extremities including the scapula (48%), sternum (43%), and lower extremities (43%). The patterns of abnormal uptake were classified into three groups: focal (15 patients, 65%), diffuse (2 patients, 9%), and a mixed pattern (6 patients, 26%). Most of the lesions showed intense abnormal uptake (18 patients, 78%); 5 patients had both intense and moderate FDG uptake. Thirteen of the 23 patients with confirmed bone metastases also had a bone scan, which revealed positive bone disease in all of these patients. However, PET consistently revealed more metastatic foci than did the bone scan on a lesion basis. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent pattern of detectable bone metastases with FDG-PET imaging was multiple foci of intense uptake. PET revealed more lesions than did bone scanning, independent of the type of cancer or location of bone involvement, in patients who were accurately diagnosed by FDG-PET imaging.     

Sensitivity in detecting osseous lesions depends on anatomic localization: planar bone scintigraphy versus 18F PET.

Radionuclide bone scanning (RNB) is considered to be the most practical screening technique for assessing the entire skeleton for skeletal metastases. However, RNB has been shown to be of lower sensitivity than MRI and CT in detecting osteolytic metastases. A prospective study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of planar RNB versus tomographic bone imaging with 18F-labeled NaF and PET (18F PET) in detecting osteolytic and osteoblastic metastases and its dependency on their anatomic localization. METHODS: Forty-four patients with known prostate, lung or thyroid carcinoma were examined with both planar RNB and 18F PET. A panel of reference methods including MRI of the spine, 1311 scintigraphy, conventional radiography and spiral CT was used as the gold standard. RNB and 18F PET were compared by a lesion-by-lesion analysis using a five-point score for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: 18F PET showed 96 metastases (67 of prostate carcinoma and 29 of lung or thyroid cancer), whereas RNB revealed 46 metastases (33 of prostate carcinoma and 13 of lung or thyroid cancer). All lesions found with RNB were also detected with 18F PET. Compared with 18F PET and the reference methods, RNB had a sensitivity of 82.8% in detecting malignant and benign osseous lesions in the skull, thorax and extremities and a sensitivity of 40% in the spine and pelvis. The area under the ROC curve was 0.99 for 18F PET and 0.64 for RNB. CONCLUSION: 18F PET is more sensitive than RNB in detecting osseous lesions. With RNB, sensitivity in detecting osseous metastases is highly dependent on anatomic localization of these lesions, whereas detection rates of osteoblastic and osteolytic metastases are similar. Higher detection rates and more accurate differentiation between benign and malignant lesions with 18F PET suggest the use of 18F PET when possible.     

Detection of bone metastases in thyroid cancer patients: bone scintigraphy or 18F-FDG PET?

BACKGROUND: Similar to the situation in other tumour types, it is currently unclear whether fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is adequate in the detection of bone metastases of thyroid cancer. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of bone scans in comparison with FDG PET in the detection of bone metastases in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients had undergone both FDG PET and bone scans within 6 months because of suspected bone metastases. All scans were re-evaluated using all available additional imaging and clinical data for verification. Scan findings were scored as positive, negative or doubtful. RESULTS: Bone metastases were present in eight of 24 (33%) patients. Only bone scintigraphy but not FDG PET suggested the presence of bone metastases in three patients, all confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/X-ray. Five patients were identified with bone metastases on both bone scan and FDG PET, which was confirmed by computed tomography (CT)/MRI/X-ray in four. Five patients had doubtful findings on bone scans whereas FDG PET scans were negative. MRI showed degenerative disorders in two of five and was normal in two. Eleven patients had both a negative bone scan and FDG PET scan. CONCLUSION: In three of eight (38%) thyroid cancer patients bone metastases were only identified on bone scans. Therefore, bone scans are still valuable in detecting bone metastases in patients with DTC and can not be replaced by FDG PET.     

18F-FDG PET/CT在黑色素瘤中的应用价值

目的 探讨18F-脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT显像在黑色素瘤诊断、临床分期及监测治疗后肿瘤复发与转移灶中的应用价值.方法 黑色素瘤患者61例,均进行18F-FDG PET/CT全身显像.所有PET、CT及PET/CT融合图像均通过融合软件进行帧对帧对比分析.肿瘤病灶根据病理学检查、多种影像学检查及临床随访结果诊断.结果 18F-FDG PET/CT显像对黑色素瘤病灶检出的灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为90.9%(40/44)、88.2%(15/17)和90.2%(55/61).其中12例治疗前患者中,18F-FDG PET/CT显像诊断的灵敏度为83.3%(10/12).在黑色素瘤病灶局部切除、尚未进行其他治疗的9例患者中,5例残余病灶18F-FDG PET/CT显像检出3例;4例远处转移灶患者全被检出,提高了临床分期,改变了治疗方案.首先发现转移性黑色素瘤病灶并且手术切除后,寻找原发灶的7例患者中,18F-FDG PET/CT检出原发灶2例,4例其他转移灶全被检出.黑色素瘤患者根治术后监测肿瘤复发或转移患者33例,18F-FDG PET/CT显像灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为100.0%(19/19)、85.7%(12/14)和93.9%(31/33).与同期临床其他影像学检查比较,18F-FDG PET/CT显像发现更多,33例患者中,16例(48.5%)病灶提高临床分期;7例(21.2%)排除可疑病灶,降低临床分期;10例(30.3%)检出病灶与临床一致.结论 18F-FDG PET/CT显像对于黑色素瘤的诊断,残余病灶、复发病灶及转移灶的检出,临床分期的明确具有重要价值.     

Evaluation of [<Superscript>18</Superscript>F]-choline PET/CT for staging and restaging of prostate cancer

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of [¹⁸F]-choline (FCH) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for staging and restaging of prostate cancer. Methods FCH PET/CT was performed in 111 patients with prostate cancer using 200 MBq FCH: 43 patients [mean age 63 years; mean prostrate specific antigen (PSA) 11.58 μg/l] were examined for initial staging, and 68 patients (mean age 66.4 years) were examined for restaging (mean PSA 10.81 μg/l). FCH PET/CT results were correlated to histopathology, bone scan, morphology as revealed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT, PET/CT follow-up and PSA follow-up after therapy. Results FCH PET/CT scans at initial staging correctly showed no metastases in 36/38 patients undergoing radical surgery, as confirmed by PSA levels <0.1 μg/l 6 months postoperatively. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 24 of these patients, revealing four false FCH-negative lymph nodes (LN). In one patient, only lymphadenectomy was performed since a FCH-positive LN was confirmed by histology. Four patients showed FCH-positive bone metastases, as proven by bone scan. FCH PET/CT scans at restaging correctly revealed local recurrence in 36 patients. No pathological FCH uptake was observed in 11 patients with biochemical recurrence. Twenty-three patients showed FCH-positive LN. Twenty LN were surgically removed in seven patients. Histopathology verified metastases in all LN, but revealed two additional metastastic, FCH-negative LN. Seventeen patients showed FCH-positive bone metastases, as proven by bone scan or MRI. Sensitivity to detect recurrent disease was 86%. Conclusion The results obtained using FCH PET/CT scans for initial N-staging were discouraging, especially in terms of its inability to detect small metastases. Recurrent disease can be localized reliably in patients with PSA levels of >2 μg/l.     

Brain metastases detectability of routine whole body (18)F-FDG PET and low dose CT scanning in 2502 asymptomatic patients with solid extracranial tumors

As fluorine-18-fluorodesoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( (18)F-FDG PET/CT) is gaining wider availability, more and more patients with malignancies undergo whole body PET/CT, mostly to assess tumor spread in the rest of the body, but not in the brain. Brain is a common site of metastatic spread in patients with solid extracranial tumors. Gold standard in the diagnosis of brain metastases remains magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However MRI is not routinely indicated and is not available for all cancer patients. Fluorine-18-FDG PET is considered as having poor sensitivity in detecting brain metastases, but this may not be true for PET/CT. The aim of our study was to assess the value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of brain metastases found by whole body scan including the brain, in patients with solid extracranial neoplasms. A total of 2502 patients with solid extracranial neoplasms were studied. All patients underwent a routine whole body (18)F-FDG PET/CT scan with the whole brain included in the scanned field. Patients with known or suspected brain metastases were preliminary excluded from the study. Hypermetabolic and ring-like brain lesions on the PET scan were considered as metastases. Lesions with CT characteristics of brain metastases were regarded as such irrespective of their metabolic pattern. Lesions in doubt were verified by MRI during first testing or on follow-up or by operation. Our results showed that brain lesions, indicative of and verified to be metastases were detected in 25 out of the 2502 patients (1%), with lung cancer being the most common primary. Twenty three out of these 25 patients had no neurological symptoms by the time of the scan. The detection rate of brain metastases was relatively low, but information was obtained with a minimum increase of radiation burden. In conclusion, whole body (18)F-FDG PET/CT detected brain metastases in 1% of the patients if brain was included in the scanned field. Brain scanning as a part of whole body scan cannot replace routine imaging techniques, but in case of positive findings provides early and crucial information for further patient management, especially in asymptomatic patients.     

Is the assessment of the central skeleton sufficient for osseous staging in breast cancer patients? A retrospective approach using bone scans

Objective

By analyzing bone scans we aimed to determine whether the assessment of the central skeleton is sufficient for osseous staging in breast cancer patients. This might be of interest for future staging modalities, especially positron emission tomography/computed tomography, usually sparing the peripheral extremities, as well as the skull.

Materials and methods

In this retrospective study, a total of 837 bone scans for initial staging or restaging of breast cancer were included. A total of 291 bone scans in 172 patients were positive for bone metastases. The localization and distribution of the metastases were re-evaluated by two readers in consensus. The extent of the central skeleton involvement was correlated to the incidence of peripheral metastases.

Results

In all 172 patients bone metastases were seen in the central skeleton (including the proximal third of humerus and femur). In 34 patients (19.8 %) peripheral metastases of the extremities (distally of the proximal third of humerus and femur) could be detected. Sixty-four patients (37.2 %) showed metastases of the skull. Summarizing the metastases of the distal extremities and skull, 79 patients (45.9 %) had peripheral metastases. None of the patients showed peripheral metastases without any affliction of the central skeleton. The incidence of peripheral metastases significantly correlated with the extent of central skeleton involvement (p?<?0.001).

Conclusions

Regarding bone scans, an isolated metastatic spread to the peripheral skeleton without any manifestation in the central skeleton seems to be the exception. Thus, the assessment of the central skeleton should be sufficient in osseous breast cancer staging and restaging. However, in case of central metastases, additional imaging of the periphery should be considered for staging and restaging.     

Evaluation of FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer.

Although many human cancers can be imaged by 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and PET, there is little clinical experience with FDG PET in cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of FDG PET scans on patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: FDG PET scans were performed on 21 patients with histologically proven uterine cervical cancer (17 newly diagnosed, 4 recurrence). After two levels of transmission scanning, approximately 370 MBq FDG were injected, and dynamic scans over 60 min were obtained at the level of suspected tumors, followed by static scans. Postvoid scans were also obtained in 11 patients to minimize FDG activity in the urinary bladder. FDG uptake was interpreted visually and classified into 4 grades (0 = normal, 1 = probably normal, 2 = probably abnormal and 3 = definitely abnormal). For a semiquantitative index of FDG uptake in tumors, the standardized uptake value (SUV) corrected by predicted lean body mass (SUL) was calculated and compared. The detectability of lymph node metastases by PET was compared with that by CT. RESULTS: Of the 21 newly diagnosed or recurrent cancers, 16 (76%) were detected by FDG PET without use of postvoid imaging (i.e., interpreted as grade 2 or 3). The SULs of tumors ranged from 2.74-13.03, with a mean of 8.15 +/- 3.00 (SUV range 3.68-14.94, mean 10.31 +/- 3.19). There was no significant relationship between the SUL of cervical cancer and the clinical stage. Postvoid FDG PET images substantially reduced the tracer activity in the urinary bladder and improved the visualization of cervical cancers, with three additional cases detected using the postvoid images. In the 11 patients with postvoid imaging, all 11 cancers (100%) were detected. FDG PET detected lymph node metastases in 6 (86%) of 7 patients with known metastases, whereas CT was positive in 4 patients (57%), equivocal in 2 patients (29%) and negative in 1 patient (14%). All PET and CT scans were true-negative in the patients with no lymph node metastases (interpreted as grade 0 or 1 by PET, and as negative by CT). CONCLUSION: These preliminary data demonstrate the feasibility of FDG PET imaging in patients with cervical cancer. FDG PET appears to be promising for detecting untreated or recurrent cervical cancers and lymph node metastases, although the excreted FDG in the urine remains problematic in some cases.     

Usefulness of 18F-fluoride PET/CT in Breast Cancer Patients with Osteosclerotic Bone Metastases

Purpose

Bone metastasis is an important factor for the treatment and prognosis of breast cancer patients. Whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBBS) can evaluate skeletal metastases, and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT seems to exhibit high specificity and accuracy in detecting bone metastases. However, there is a limitation of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in assessing sclerotic bone metastases because some lesions may be undetectable. Recent studies showed that ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT is more sensitive than WBBS in detecting bone metastases. This study aims to evaluate the usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT by comparing it with WBBS and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients with osteosclerotic skeletal metastases.

Materials and Methods

Nine breast cancer patients with suspected bone metastases (9 females; mean age ± SD, 55.6 ± 10.0 years) underwent ^99mTc-MDP WBBS, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT. Lesion-based analysis of five regions of the skeletons (skull, vertebral column, thoracic cage, pelvic bones and long bones of extremities) and patient-based analysis were performed.

Results

¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and WBBS detected 49, 20 and 25 true metastases, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT were 94.2 %, 46.3 %, 57.7 % and 91.2 %, respectively. Most true metastatic lesions on ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT had osteosclerotic change (45/49, 91.8 %), and only four lesions showed osteolytic change. Most lesions on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT also demonstrated osteosclerotic change (17/20, 85.0 %) with three osteolytic lesions. All true metastatic lesions detected on WBBS and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were identified on ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT.

Conclusion

¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT is superior to WBBS or ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in detecting osteosclerotic metastatic lesions. ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT might be useful in evaluating osteosclerotic metastases in breast cancer patients.     

Detection of unexpected additional primary malignancies with PET/CT.

This study evaluated the yield of whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of unexpected (18)F-FDG-avid additional primary malignant tumors in patients being evaluated by PET/CT for known or suspected malignances. METHODS: Reports from whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans from June 2001 to June 2003 were reviewed, and 1,912 patients (924 men and 988 women; mean age +/- SD, 58.9 +/- 13.9 y) who had been scanned for known or suspected malignant lesions were included in this study. The sites of known or suspected primary tumors included lung (28.6%), colon or rectum (12.4%), head or neck (12.1%), lymph nodes (10.9%), breast (7.6%), gynecologic organs (7.1%), genitourinary organs (4.2%), esophagus (3.6%), skin (melanoma) (3.5%), pancreas (2.5%), bone or soft tissue (2.2%), and other sites (5.4%). Lesions that were newly discovered on PET/CT, had not been previously detected by other modalities, and were atypical in location for metastases on the PET/CT study were interpreted as suggestive of a new primary malignant tumor. These abnormalities were compared with the final diagnosis obtained from the medical records, including pathologic reports. RESULTS: PET-positive lesions suggestive of new primary malignant tumors were found in 79 (4.1%) of 1,912 patients. In 22 (1.2%) of 1,912 patients, these lesions were pathologically proven to be malignant. Proven sites were lung (7 lesions), thyroid (6 lesions), colon (4 lesions), breast (2 lesions), esophagus (2 lesions), bile duct (1 lesion), and head and neck other than thyroid (1 lesion). Two new lesions in the lung and the thyroid were proven malignant in 1 patient. In 17 patients, the treatment plan was changed and the new lesion was surgically resected after the PET/CT examination. In 10 patients, PET was falsely positive after pathologic assessment. False-positive sites included thyroid (5 lesions), uterus (2 lesions), head and neck other than thyroid (2 lesions), and lung (1 lesion). In 8 patients, the PET-positive lesions were considered benign after clinical follow-up of at least 8 mo. In 39 patients, the follow-up record was not yet available and the final diagnosis of the detected lesion has not yet been resolved. CONCLUSION: Whole-body PET/CT detected new, unexpected (18)F-FDG-avid primary malignant tumors in at least 1.2% of patients with cancer.