角膜生物参数对青光眼患者眼压测量影响的研究

目的:探讨角膜生物参数对青光眼患者眼压测量的影响。方法:对80例121眼青光眼患者进行眼反应分析仪(ocular response analyzer,ORA)与Goldmann压平眼压计(Goldmann applanation tonometer,GAT)测量,并用先进的OrbscanⅡ眼前节分析系统测量中央角膜厚度(central corneal thickness,CCT)。结果:平均矫正眼压(IOPcc)值17.41±5.62mmHg;平均GAT值15.76±6.06mmHg;IOPcc与角膜滞后性(cornealhysteresis,CH)有相关性(P=0.000;r=-0.236);IOPcc与GAT显著相关(P=0.000;r=0.857);IOPcc与CCT无相关性。结论:对已经诊断的青光眼患者,平均IOPcc值高于平均GAT值;随着CH的降低,IOPcc值有升高的趋势;且IOPcc值不受CCT值的影响。     

Hornhautdickenunabhängige Methoden der Messung des Augeninnendrucks

Introduction

Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) has been the gold standard for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) for about 50 years. However, it depends on central corneal thickness (CCT) and is, therefore, prone to being incorrect. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) has recently been introduced to measure IOP independently of CCT; however, DCT is costly and difficult. IOP measurement using the ocular response analyzer (ORA) offers noncontact tonometry with declaration of the corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc), which takes corneal hysteresis (CH) into account and is supposed to be independent of CCT.

Patients and methods

Using the ORA instrument, IOPcc was determined in 192 glaucoma eyes and 59 nonglaucoma eyes. Subsequently, measurement by DCT and GAT was performed. IOP measurements were compared and analyzed with respect to CCT and CH.

Results

Average values were as follows: IOPcc, 18.38±6.3 mmHg; GAT, 14.69±4.5 mmHg; DCT, 15.17±3.9 mmHg; CH, 9.96±2.5 mmHg; CCT, 552±57 μm. Neither CCT nor CH differed between the two groups. There was a positive correlation between GAT and CCT that did not exist for IOPcc and DCT values. However, IOPcc and DCT differed significantly in Bland–Altman analysis (p<0.01). Furthermore, these two IOP values differed significantly with respect to CH and the level of IOP.

Conclusion

Because IOPcc is not a primarily measured variable but also takes CH into account, a direct comparison of DCT and IOPcc values is not acceptable, and a simple correction factor may not be valid.     

Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open‐angle glaucoma

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure (IOP) and the role of biomechanical properties in eyes of patients with unilateral primary open‐angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: The biomechanical properties of corneal hysteresis (CH) and the corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured with the ocular response analyser (ORA). In an experimental setting, three human donor eyes with Schiotz‐tonometry‐controlled IOP were investigated. In addition, a series of patients with unilateral POAG were evaluated. Main outcome measures were CH, CRF, corneal‐compensated IOP (IOPcc), standard automated perimetry parameters mean defect (MD) and pattern standard deviation, central corneal thickness, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and cup‐to‐disc ratio. Results: A highly significant linear correlation between CH and the corneal‐compensated IOP (IOPcc, r = ?0.926; p < 0.001) was found. The correlation between IOP_CC and CRF was not significant (r = 0.335; p = 0.08). In total, 36 eyes of 18 patients with unilateral POAG were examined. Regarding uncorrected CH (mean 7.73 ± 1.46 mmHg glaucomatous eye and 9.28 ± 1.42 mmHg fellow eye), there was a highly significant difference between both eyes. This difference disappears, when CH was corrected for IOP (9.44 ± 3.78 mmHg and 9.97 ± 3.22 mmHg, respectively). Conclusions: Corneal hysteresis but not corneal resistance factor is dependent on IOP. In patients with unilateral POAG, IOP is higher in the affected eye. When CH is corrected for IOP, corneal biomechanical properties do not differ in both eyes of patients with unilateral POAG.     

Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To assess the changes in corneal hysteresis (CH) as measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, New York, USA) to describe the influence of clear corneal cataract surgery on corneal viscoelastic properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by noncontact tonometry (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional, comparative study. METHODS: One hundred and one eyes of 101 consecutive patients who underwent routine clear corneal cataract surgery were evaluated. CH, NCT, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured by ORA before surgery and at postoperative day 1. A control group of 48 pseudophakic eyes (surgery >3 months previously) was included. RESULTS: CCT increased from 556.82 +/- 32.5 microm before surgery to 580.26 +/- 45.5 microm after surgery (P < .001; control, 555.16 +/- 42.33 microm). Mean CH decreased from 10.35 +/- 2.5 mm Hg before surgery to 9.20 +/- 1.9 mm Hg after surgery (P < .001; control, 10.47 +/- 1.63 mm Hg). NCT values rose from 17.85 +/- 3.8 mm Hg before surgery to 20.10 +/- 6.3 mm Hg after surgery. GAT values were 14.85 +/- 2.8 mm Hg before surgery and 15.24 +/- 4.1 mm Hg after surgery (P = .52). There was no significant difference of CCT or CH between the preoperative values and the values of the control group (CCT, P = .986; CH, P = .166), in contrast to the difference between postoperative values and the values of the control group (CCT, P = .005; CH, P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: At day 1 after clear corneal cataract surgery, CH is diminished, whereas CCT is increased significantly. Postoperative corneal edema leads to a change of corneal viscoelastic properties, resulting in a lower damping capacity of the cornea. It is supposed that GAT and NCT measurements are significantly different because of postoperative changes in viscoelastic properties of the cornea.     

Corneal biomechanical properties in normal‐tension glaucoma

Purpose: To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) and corneal biomechanical properties of normal and normal‐tension glaucoma (NTG) eyes. Methods: This study included 83 normal and 83 NTG eyes. We measured corneal‐compensated IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann‐correlated IOP (IOPg), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal hysteresis (CH) and central corneal thickness (CCT) three times each for normal and NTG eyes using an Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Results: No significant difference in CCT was seen between normal eyes (541.4 ± 26.8 μm) and NTG eyes (535.4 ± 24.9 μm; p = 0.16). IOPcc was significantly higher in NTG eyes (16.1 ± 2.6 mmHg) than in normal eyes (15.1 ± 2.9 mmHg; p = 0.01), while IOPg was significantly lower in NTG eyes (14.1 ± 2.7 mmHg) than in normal eyes (15.1 ± 3.0 mmHg; p = 0.04). CRF and CH were significantly lower in NTG eyes (CRF, 8.9 ± 1.5 mmHg; CH, 9.2 ± 1.3 mmHg) than in normal eyes (CRF, 10.6 ± 1.4 mmHg; CH, 10.8 ± 1.3 mmHg; p < 0.0001 each). Conclusion: IOPcc was significantly higher in NTG eyes than in normal eyes. The ORA may be useful for distinguishing between the IOPcc of NTG eyes with normal IOP and that of normal eyes. In addition, the ORA enables CRF and CH to be measured in vivo, and weakness of the lamina cribrosa may be clinically inferred from the fact that CRF and CH were reduced in NTG eyes in our study. Low CRF and CH may be clues to the pathology of NTG.     

Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of the cornea and their association with intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT) and the central corneal radius of curvature (Rc). Methods: Eighty‐three eyes were divided into two groups. The biomechanical properties of the cornea were measured in 63 normal eyes and in 20 post‐laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes. The IOP, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). The Rc and CCT were measured using the corneal topographer Medmont E‐300 and the Tomey SP‐100 Handy ultrasonic pachymeter. Other parameters measured by the ORA, such as TimeIn and TimeOut, were also studied. Results: A mean corneal hysteresis of 10.8 mmHg and CRF of 10.6 mmHg were recorded for the normal eyes. There was no significant association with central curvature. All parameters measured by the ORA showed a significant correlation with the CCT, except for the corneal‐compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc). Both IOPs measured by the ORA had the same values for the mean CH and CRF. For the post‐LASIK eyes, the CH and CRF were lower than in the normal non‐operated eyes. The TimeIn and the TimeOut also presented lower values for the post‐LASIK eyes, suggesting that additional data can be obtained with the ORA measurements. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that there is no correlation between the parameters measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer and central corneal radius of curvature. Some of the biomechanical properties of the cornea studied were found to differ in the normal eyes compared to the post‐LASIK eyes.     

Assessment of intraocular pressure measured by Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Dynamic Contour Tonometry in healthy individuals

AIM: To investigate the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by a Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), as well as the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP as measured by ORA, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). METHODS: A total of 158 healthy individuals (296 eyes) were chosen randomly for measurement of IOP. After CCT was measured using A-ultrasound (A-US), IOP was measured by ORA, GAT, and DCT devices in a randomized order. The IOP values acquired using each of the three tonometries were compared, and the relationship between CCT and IOP values were analyzed separately. Two IOP values, Goldmann-correlated IOP value (IOPg) and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc), were got using ORA. Three groups were defined according to CCT: 1) thin cornea (CCT<520μm); 2) normal-thickness cornea (CCT: 520–580μm); and 3) thick cornea (CCT>580μm) groups. RESULTS: In normal subjects, IOP measurements were 14.95±2.99mmHg with ORA (IOPg), 15.21±2.77mmHg with ORA (IOPcc), 15.22±2.77mmHg with GAT, and 15.49±2.56mmHg with DCT. Mean differences were 0.01±2.29mmHg between IOPcc and GAT (P>0.05) and 0.28±2.20mmHg between IOPcc and DCT (P>0.05). There was a greater correlation between IOPcc and DCT (r=0.946, P=0.000) than that between IOPcc and GAT (r=0.845, P=0.000). DCT had a significant correlation with GAT (r=0.854, P=0.000). GAT was moderately correlated with CCT (r=0.296, P<0.001), while IOPcc showed a weak but significant correlation with CCT (r=?0.155, P=0.007). There was a strong negative correlation between CCT and the difference between IOPcc and GAT(r=-0.803,P=0.000), with every 10μm increase in CCT resulting in an increase in this difference of 0.35mmHg. The thick cornea group (CCT>580μm) showed the least significant correlation between IOPcc and GAT (r=0.859, P=0.000); while the thin cornea group (CCT＜520μm) had the most significant correlation between IOPcc and GAT (r=0.926, P=0.000). The correlated differences between IOPcc and DCT were not significant in any of the three groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Measurement of IOP by ORA has high repeatability and is largely consistent with GAT measurements. Moreover, the ORA measurements are affected only to a small extent by CCT, and are likely to be much closer to the real IOP value than GAT.     

Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry

PURPOSE: To compare the preoperative and postoperative measurement of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), the ocular response analyzer (ORA), and the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT) in eyes undergoing myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS: IOP was measured in 66 myopic eyes before and after LASIK by GAT, ORA, and PDCT in a randomized sequence. Metrics of corneal biomechanical properties (corneal hysteresis [CH], corneal resistance factor [CRF], and ocular pulse amplitude [OPA]) were recorded. RESULTS: After LASIK, there was a reduction in mean corneal pachymetry of 90.2 mum and in IOP measurements with GAT (Delta = -1.8 +/- 2.8 mm Hg; P < .01), ORA-Goldmann (Delta = -4.6 +/- 2.8 mm Hg, P < .01), and ORA-corneal compensated (Delta - 2.1 +/- 2.6 mm Hg; P < .05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements taken by PDCT (Delta = -0.5 +/- 2.6 mm Hg). Postoperatively, CRF decreased by 28.6% (P < .01), CH by 16.2% (P < .01), and OPA by 1.8% (P = .32). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of IOP with PDCT appears to be relatively immune to changes in corneal biomechanics and pachymetry after LASIK, in comparison to GAT and ORA measures of IOP. PDCT and ORA both showed statistically lower variation in measurement than GAT. LASIK produced a marked decline in CH and CRF, which may reflect respective changes in the viscous and elastic qualities of the post-LASIK cornea. In contrast, there was no statistical change in OPA.     

角膜补偿眼压与前房穿刺测量眼内压的比较

目的 比较角膜补偿眼压(IOPcc)与前房穿刺测量眼压(direct intracameral IOP,IOPintra),探讨角膜生物特性对眼压测量的影响.方法 双肓前瞻性研究.拟行超声乳化手术患者73例(73只眼),随机选择1只眼.超声测厚仪测量中央角膜厚度(CCT),ORA测量IOPcc和角膜生物属性:角膜滞后性(cornealhysteresis,CH).角膜阻力因子(corneal resistance factor,CRF).应用IOD眼压测量装置行前房穿刺测量IOPintra.结果 IOPintra为(15.48±4.64)mmHg,IOPcc为(16.63±3.68)mmHg;IOPcc高出IOPintra(1.15±4.12)mmHg(P=0.019);IOPcc和IOPintra与CH、CRF相关,IOPcc,IOPintra及两者的差异与CCT不相关;IOPcc与IOPintra的差异与cH相关(r=-0.283 P=0.015).结论 IOPcc读数比IOPintra高1.15mmHg,其差异受CH影响.角膜生物属性对眼压测量的影响需慎重考虑.     

Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser

BACKGROUND: The Ocular Response Analyser (ORA, Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments) is a non-contact applanation tonometer, providing two measures of intraocular pressure (IOP) - IOPg which represents a Goldmann equivalent IOP measure and IOPcc, representing a measure of IOP independent of corneal effects. In addition, the device provides two measures believed to represent corneal biomechanical properties: corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of these measurements. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One randomly chosen eye from 49 healthy volunteers was measured four times consecutively with the ORA prior to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). The repeatability coefficient (RC), the coefficient of variation (CV) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated as a measure of intrasession repeatability. RESULTS: CH was the most variable and IOPg the most repeatable measure, with an RC of 2.61 and 1.97, respectively, and ICC of 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. CV ranged between 5.73 % for IOPg and 12.38 % for CH. ORA IOP measurements were higher than GAT (IOPcc = 17.43 +/- 3.23; IOPg = 17.53 +/- 3.0; GAT = 15.75 +/- 2.77 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: ORA measurements show good short-term repeatability in normal volunteers. Thus, this device appears to be applicable in clinical practice.     

Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following Femto-LASIK using Goldman applanation tonometry and ocular response analyzer

AIM:To compare intraocular pressure(IOP)measurements before and after laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK)with a femtosecond laser for flap creation using ocular response analyzer(ORA)and Goldmann applanation tonometry,and to identify factors that may influence the preoperative and postoperative IOP.METHODS:A prospective study conducted on myopic patients who underwent LASIK using a femtosecond laser for flap fashioning.Enrolled patients were evaluated preoperatively,6 wk and 3 mo postoperatively for manifest refraction(MR),keratometric(K)readings and central corneal thickness(CCT)using a scheimpflug-based topography.Corneal resistance factor(CRF),corneal hysteresis(CH),Goldmann correlated IOP(IOPg)and corneal compensated IOP(IOPcc)were measured using ORA besides IOP assessment by Goldman applanation tonometry(GAT).RESULTS:There was a statistically significant decrease in measures of IOPg by 3.35±0.83 mm Hg,followed by GAT which decreased by 2.2±0.44 mm Hg,and the least affected by operation was IOPcc which decreased only by 0.87±0.1 mm Hg after 6 wk.After 3 mo follow up there was a statistically significant decrease in IOPcc which decreased only by 0.76±0.4 mm Hg,followed by IOP GAT by 1.6±0.5 mm Hg,and the most affected by operation was IOPg which decreased by 2.3±0.3 mm Hg.Correspondingly,there was a statistically significant decrease in CH and CRF after 6 wk and 3 mo.At 3 mo,the preoperative MR and preoperative GAT were prominent significant predictors of the postoperative GAT changes.The prediction equation was subsumed.CONCLUSION:IOP measurements and corneal biomechanical factors reduce significantly after LASIK with a femtosecond laser for flap creation.The IOPcc values are less influenced by changes in corneal properties than IOPg and GAT,indicating that IOPcc may provide the most reliable measurement of IOP after this procedure.     

眼反应分析仪与非接触眼压计眼压测量的对比观察

目的比较眼反应分析仪(ORA)与非接触眼压计(NCT)测量眼压结果的差异,分析ORA、NCT测量结果与角膜中央厚度(CCT)的关系。方法近视患者57例(114只眼),于准分子激光手术前行ORA测量,得出角膜补偿眼压(IOPcc)和Goldmann相关眼压值(IOPg)两个数值,NCT测眼压3次取平均值。结果 ORA测得IOPcc平均值16.85 mm Hg,IOPpg平均值15.26 mm Hg,NCT眼压计测得平均值15.66 mm Hg;IOPcc>NCT>IOPg。IOPcc、IOPg与NCT所测眼压值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。NCT和IOPg均与CCT呈正相关(r:分别为0.463和0.419,P<0.05);IOPcc与CCT无相关性(r:0.230,P>0.05)。结论 ORA测量屈光不正患者的眼压与NCT测量结果存在一定差异,其中IOPcc不受角膜厚度的影响,在临床运用中准确性较好。     

Evaluation of biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism

The purpose of this study is to compare the corneal biomechanical properties in primary hyperparathyroid patients and healthy control subjects. The study consisted of 31 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (study group) and 31 healthy subjects (control group). Corneal biomechanical properties, including corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured with an ocular response analyzer (ORA). IOP was also measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter. The differences in ORA parameters and CCT between study and control group participants were analyzed. The mean CH in study and control groups was 8.7 ± 1.9 mmHg (5.3–13.7 mmHg) and 9.8 ± 1.5 mmHg (7.7–14.3 mmHg), respectively (p = 0.018). The mean CRF was 9.5 ± 1.8 (5.5–13.7) in the study group compared with 9.8 ± 1.5 (6.2–12.8) in the control group. The difference for CRF was not statistically significant (p = 0.41). In study and control group, corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc) values were 18.2 ± 4.2 and 16.9 ± 2.7 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.12). Mean IOP measurement values with GAT were 16.3 ± 3.4 mmHg for study group and 16.5 ± 2.7 mmHg for control group (p = 0.71). The mean differences of IOPcc and IOPGAT in the study group eyes were higher than that of control group eyes (1.9 vs. 0.4 mmHg). CCT was 536.5 ± 25.4 µm (490–593 µm) in study group eyes compared with 534.2 ± 31.4 µm (472–602 µm) in control eyes (p = 0.75). Hyperparathyroidism could be associated with a decrease of CH. The differences between IOPcc and IOPGAT in these patients were higher than normal subjects. Underestimation of IOP readings with GAT may be a consequence of the lower CH in patients with hyperparathyroididsm.     

Comparation of the new rebound tonometer IOPen and the Goldmann tonometer, and their relationship to corneal properties

Purpose

To compare the intraocular pressures (IOPs) obtained with the IOPen rebound tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and investigate the effects of corneal biomechanical properties on IOPen measurements.

Methods

A total of 198 normal eyes were included in this cross-sectional and randomized study. Three measurements were taken using IOPen. Agreement between tonometers was calculated using the Bland and Altman limits of agreement (LoA) analysis.

Results

The median IOPen IOP was 3 mm Hg below the GAT (P<0.001), 3 mm Hg below the ORA IOP similar to Goldmann (IOPg), and 3 mm Hg below the ORA IOP corrected using corneal parameters (IOPcc)(P<0.01). The LoA width between the IOPen and GAT IOPs varied between 13.92 (mean IOPen IOP) and 15.99 mm Hg (third IOPen measurement). The central corneal thickness (CCT) was unrelated to IOPen measurements (P>0.05). Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal rigidity factor (CRF) were correlated with IOPen and GAT.

Conclusions

IOPen underestimated the IOP compared with GAT and ORA. The effect of measurement quality or measurement order on IOPen was low. CCT did not affect the IOPen, but the CH and CRF did. The LoA width between the IOPen and GAT IOPs was higher than between the ORA IOPg or ORA IOPcc and GAT IOPs.     

Internal limiting membrane dragging and peeling: a modified technique for macular holes closure surgery

AIM: To introduce a modified technique of internal limiting membrane (ILM) centripetal dragging and peeling to treat idiopathic macular hole (IMH) and to observe the ILM-retina adhesive forces. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with stage 3 to 4 IMH and followed up at least six months were enrolled. All patients underwent complete par plana vitrectomy, ILM dragging and peeling, fluid and gas exchange, 15% C3F8 tamponade and 2-week prone position. The best corrected visual acuity, macular hole evaluation by optical coherence tomography, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean diameter of IMH was 524±148 μm (range: 201-683 μm), with 21 cases (80.8%) greater than 400 μm. ILM dragging and peeling were successfully performed in all cases. Most of the ILM-retina adhesive forces are severe (42.3%, 11/26), followed by mild (38.5%, 10/26), and moderate (19.2%, 5/26). The mean follow-up duration was 21.2±6.1mo. The IMH was closed in 25 (96.3%) eyes. Visual acuity (logMAR) improved significantly from 1.2±0.6 preoperatively to 0.7±0.5 postoperatively (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Preexisting ILM-retina adhesive force is found in IMH patients. With assistance of this force, this modified technique may help to release the IMH edges and improve the closure rate of large IMH.     

Inter-instrument agreement and influence of central corneal thickness on measurements with Goldmann, pneumotonometer and noncontact tonometer in glaucomatous eyes

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by the Goldman applanation tonometer (GAT), non contact tonometer (NCT) and the ocular blood flow (OBF) pneumotonometer in different IOP ranges in glaucomatous eyes. The effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurement in chronic glaucomatous eyes using the three different tonometers was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IOP measurements of 130 eyes of primary glaucoma patients were performed using GAT by an ophthalmologist while NCT and OBF-pneumotonometer measurements were performed by an experienced optometrist. The IOP values were compared amongst the three instruments in the three different IOP ranges (0-18 mmHg, > 18 to 25 mmHg, > 25 mmHg). CCT was also measured in all patients. RESULTS: The mean of paired difference between GAT and NCT was 0.9 +/- 3.1 mmHg while that between GAT and OBF-pneumotonometer was 0.3 +/- 3.4 mmHg. The OBF-pneumotonometer and NCT were more affected by corneal thickness (0.41 mmHg and 0.4 mmHg / 10 micro corneal thickness respectively) while GAT was the least affected by corneal thickness (0.3 mmHg / 10 micro corneal thickness) though the difference was not statistically significant ( P =0.42). CONCLUSION: With appropriate correction for corneal thickness the NCT and OBF-pneumotonometer can be used as reliably as GAT in following up glaucomatous patients.     

Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry

PURPOSE: To analyze the correlation between corneal hysteresis (CH) measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert) and ultrasonic corneal central thickness (CCT US) and intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP GA). SETTING: Bordeaux 2 University, Ophthalmology Department, Bordeaux, France. METHODS: This study comprised 498 eyes of 258 patients. Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor (CRF), and IOP corneal-compensated (IOPcc) were provided by the ORA device; CCT US and IOP GA were also measured in each eye. The study population was divided into 5 groups: normal (n = 122), glaucoma (n = 159), keratoconus (n = 88), laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (n = 78), and photorefractive keratectomy (n = 39). The Pearson correlation was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Corneal hysteresis was not strongly correlated with IOP or CCT US. The mean CH in the LASIK (8.87 mm Hg) and keratoconus (8.34 mm Hg) groups was lower than in the glaucoma (9.48 mm Hg) and normal (10.26 mm Hg) groups. The lower the CH, the lower its correlation with IOPcc and IOP GA. A CH higher than the CRF was significantly associated with the keratoconus and post-LASIK groups. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal hysteresis, a new corneal parameter, had a moderate dependence on IOP and CCT US. Weaker corneas could be screened with ORA parameters, and low CH could be considered a risk factor for underestimation of IOP. The CCT US should continue to be considered a useful parameter.     

Comparison of IOP measurements between ORA and GAT in normal Chinese.

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained from the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) on a group of normal Chinese. METHODS: One hundred twenty-five normal subjects were recruited, with one eye randomly selected for this study. Each eye was measured first with the noncontact tonometer ORA, followed by the GAT and ultrasound pachometry, in a randomized order. Four readings were obtained from the ORA, and three measurements were taken with the GAT. The mean was used for analysis. The ORA provided a Goldmann-correlated IOP (IOPg) and a corneal-compensated IOP (IOPcc). Three central corneal thickness (CCT) values were measured using an ultrasound pachometer, and the mean was used for analysis. RESULTS: IOP obtained from the ORA was similar to that from the GAT (IOPg minus GAT: mean difference = 0.33 mm Hg, 95% limits of agreement = 4.55 to -4.44 mm Hg; IOPcc minus GAT: mean difference = 0.24 mm Hg, 95% limits of agreement = 4.83 to -5.07 mm Hg). CCT was positively associated with corneal hysteresis (CH) (r2 = 0.30, p < 0.01), corneal resistance factor (r2 = 0.38, p < 0.01), GAT (r2 = 0.09, p < 0.01) and IOPg (r2 = 0.16, p < 0.01). IOPcc was not associated with CCT (r2 = 0.01, p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Both IOPg and IOPcc have good agreement with GAT on normal subjects. The influence of CCT on IOPcc was insignificant.     

Relationship Between Corneal Hysteresis and Corneal Resistance Factor with Other Ocular Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) with age, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature (KM), corneal volume (CV), and refractive error in naïve eyes. Methods: 105 healthy subjects (58 male and 47 female) were included in this study. The ages ranged from 19 to 82 years (mean 43.1?±?15.4 years) and refraction between ?11?D and +6?D (mean ?0.79?±?2.95?D). CH and CRF obtained with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) were correlated with age, refractive error, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT), and with CCT, KM, CV obtained with the Pentacam, and with Corneal-Compensated Intraocular Pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure measurement (IOPg) obtained with ORA. A multivariable mixed effect model was used to evaluate associations among these parameters. Results: CH ranged from 6.9 to 14.6?mmHg (mean 10.26?±?1.49?mmHg); CRF ranged from 5.8 to 17?mmHg (mean 10.38?±?1.64?mmHg). Multivariate analysis showed a statistically significant correlation between CH with CCT (p?<?0.001), and KM (p?<?0.001), and between CRF with CCT (p?<?0.001) and GAT (p?<?0.001). Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis that CH and CRF are related to the corneal shape and thickness, and show a decrease of CH with age.     

手法小切口白内障摘除术后早期角膜生物力学特性的变化

目的:观察年龄相关性白内障患者手法小切口白内障摘除术(manual small incision cataract surgery,MSICS)后1d角膜滞后性(corneal hysteretic,CH)、角膜阻力因数(cornealresistance factor,CRF)、角膜补偿眼压(corneal compensa-ted IOP,IOPcc)、Goldmann相关眼压(goldmann correlatedIOP,IOPg)的变化规律,并探讨MSICS术后早期角膜生物力学特性改变的相关因素。方法:应用Reichert眼反应分析仪(ocular response analy-zer,ORA)测量50例50眼年龄相关性白内障患者术眼MSICS术前及术后1d的CH,CRF,IOPg,IOPcc。用SPSS10.0统计学软件分析各测量值的变化规律以及CH变化量与眼压变化量的相关性。结果:术后1d的CH,CRF较术前下降(P<0.01;P<0.01),IOPcc,IOPg较术前升高(P<0.01;P=0.001),CH降低量与眼压增加量呈正相关性(IOPg,r=0.492,P<0.01;IOPcc,r=0.688,P<0.01)。结论:年龄相关性白内障患者手法小切口白内障摘除术后早期角膜生物力学特性明显改变,术后角膜不同程度的水肿和眼压的升高可能是导致改变的主要原因。