Invasive versus conservative strategy after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction in patients with antecedent angina. A report from Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Phase II (TIMI II).

OBJECTIVES. This study was designed to assess the possibility that a subgroup of patients at high risk for recurrent ischemia and reinfarction after thrombolytic therapy might benefit from early intervention. BACKGROUND. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Phase II (TIMI II) study recently concluded that an obligatory invasive strategy after thrombolytic therapy offered no advantage over a more conservative strategy. METHODS. Data from the 3,534 patients enrolled in the TIMI II trial were analyzed to determine whether a history of antecedent angina before myocardial infarction identifies patients at high risk for subsequent ischemia and whether these patients might benefit from an invasive strategy. RESULTS. Within the TIMI II population, antecedent angina identified patients at increased risk for recurrent chest pain in the hospital (32.3% vs. 22.1%, p < 0.001) and recurrent infarction during the 1st year of follow-up (11.2% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.001) compared with that of patients without antecedent angina. Among patients assigned to the invasive strategy, coronary arteriography revealed that those with antecedent angina had a more severe residual stenosis of the infarct-related artery after thrombolytic therapy (77.1 +/- 0.7% vs. 73.0 +/- 0.9%, p < 0.001) and more multivessel disease (37.9% vs. 26.4%, p < 0.001). The clinical outcome of the patients with antecedent angina assigned randomly to either the invasive or the conservative strategy were compared. The invasive strategy patients had a slightly lesser incidence of recurrent chest pain in the hospital (29.9% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.13) and more negative (normal) findings on exercise tolerance tests (24.7 vs. 18.9%, p = 0.003), but there was no difference between the treatment strategies in the end point variable of recurrent myocardial infarction or death. CONCLUSIONS. These data demonstrate that antecedent angina identifies patients at increased risk for recurrent ischemic events after thrombolytic therapy. However, similar to the results for the overall population, the invasive strategy does not alter the risk of reinfarction or death compared with the conservative approach.     

Long-term outcome after primary angioplasty: report from the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction (PAMI-I) trial

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the two-year outcome after primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty or thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty, that is, angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy, has been shown to be an effective reperfusion modality for patients suffering an acute myocardial infarction. This report reviews the two-year clinical outcome of patients randomized in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial. METHODS: At 12 clinical centers, 395 patients who presented within 12 h of the onset of myocardial infarction were randomized to undergo primary angioplasty (195 patients) or to receive tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) (200 patients) followed by conservative care. Patients were followed by physician visits, phone call, letter and review of hospital records for any hospital admission at one month, six months, one year and two years. RESULTS: At two years, patients undergoing primary angioplasty had less recurrent ischemia (36.4% vs. 48% for t-PA, p = 0.026), lower reintervention rates (27.2% vs. 46.5% for t-PA, p < 0.0001) and reduced hospital readmission rates (58.5% vs. 69.0% for t-PA, p = 0.035). The combined end point of death or reinfarction was 14.9% for angioplasty versus 23% for t-PA, p = 0.034. Multivariate analysis found angioplasty to be independently predictive of a reduction in death, reinfarction or target vessel revascularization (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The initial benefit of primary angioplasty performed by experienced operators is maintained over a two-year follow-up period with improved infarct-free survival and reduced rate of reintervention.     

Antecedent angina: a predictor of residual stenosis after thrombolytic therapy

Patients with a significant residual stenosis after thrombolytic therapy are believed by many to be at increased risk for repeat ischemic events and may be candidates for prompt angiography and revascularization. To test the hypothesis that patients with antecedent angina (Canadian classes I to IV, greater than or equal to 24 h before myocardial infarction) are more likely to have a significant residual stenosis (greater than or equal to 60% diameter reduction) than are those without antecedent angina, the coronary angiograms of 82 consecutive patients undergoing routine angiography after thrombolytic therapy were reviewed. Compared with the patients without antecedent angina, the group with antecedent angina had an increased mean stenosis (74% versus 58%) and more multivessel disease (44% versus 5%). The sensitivity and specificity of a clinical history of antecedent angina predicting the presence of a significant residual stenosis were 75% and 96%, respectively; the positive predictive accuracy was 98%. These data suggest that antecedent angina can be used to identify a high risk subgroup whose condition may warrant routine coronary angiography.     

Symptom-limited versus low level exercise testing before hospital discharge after myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE. This study was undertaken to compare a low level and a symptom-limited test performed before hospital discharge after an uncomplicated myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND. Exercise testing after myocardial infarction provides useful prognostic information. Usually either a low level test is performed before hospital discharge or a symptom-limited test is performed at 3 weeks. METHODS. The study group comprised 202 patients with an uncomplicated myocardial infarction; 58 patients had a non-Q wave infarction and 115 patients had received thrombolytic therapy. Both a low level and a symptom-limited exercise test were performed in 200 of the 202 study patients in randomized order on consecutive days, a mean of 7.4 +/- 2.3 days after infarction. RESULTS. The symptom-limited test required a considerably greater effort than the low level test: exercise duration was 554 +/- 209 versus 389 +/- 125 s (p less than 0.0001), and peak work load was 5.7 +/- 1.8 versus 4.2 +/- 1.1 METs (p less than 0.0001). The peak heart rate was higher during the symptom-limited test (121 +/- 20 vs. 108 +/- 14 beats/min, p less than 0.0001), as was the rate-pressure product. The number of patients who developed ST segment depression greater than or equal to 1 mm increased from 56 during the low level test to 89 during the symptom-limited test (p less than 0.0001). ST segment depression greater than or equal to 2 mm occurred in 22 patients during the low level test and in 41 patients during the symptom-limited test, an 86% increase (p less than 0.0001). The number of patients with either angina or ST depression greater than or equal to 1 mm increased from 66 to 105 (p less than 0.0001) with the symptom-limited test. Exercise test results were similar for patients with a Q wave or a non-Q wave infarction. Exercise duration was longer and exercise-induced ST depression less frequent in patients who had received thrombolytic therapy. CONCLUSIONS. A symptom-limited exercise test performed before hospital discharge after uncomplicated myocardial infarction provides a significantly greater cardiovascular stress than does a low level test and is associated with an ischemic response nearly twice as frequently. The prognostic significance of a positive response at higher work loads has not been defined.     

Comparison of the natural history of new onset and exacerbated chronic ischemic heart disease. The Chest Pain Study Group

To compare the natural history of patients with new onset ischemic heart disease with that of patients with exacerbations of chronic ischemic heart disease, short- and long-term outcomes of 3,465 emergency room patients with acute ischemic heart disease at four community and three university hospitals were evaluated. Acute myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 598 (33%) of the 1,835 patients with a prior history of infarction or angina and 934 (57%) of the 1,630 without such a history (p less than 0.001). Patients with new onset ischemic heart disease with acute myocardial infarction were more likely than patients with infarction and exacerbated chronic ischemic heart disease to have Q wave infarction (57% versus 36%) and to receive thrombolytic therapy (11% versus 5%); they also had higher maximal creatine kinase levels (1,088 +/- 1,299 versus 733 +/- 906 U/liter) (p less than 0.0001 for all three). After adjustment for differences in clinical presentation and initial triage, patients with new onset ischemic heart disease with acute myocardial infarction were less likely than the comparison group to have congestive complications (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 0.84, p less than 0.01) but not less likely to have arrhythmic, ischemic or overall complications. Among patients with angina without acute myocardial infarction, patients with new onset ischemic heart disease were less likely to have recurrent ischemic pain and congestive heart failure. In multivariate analysis of long-term follow-up data on 457 patients from one hospital, patients with new onset ischemic heart disease had better cardiovascular survival rates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Coronary bypass surgery improves global and regional left ventricular function following thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group

Coronary bypass surgery was performed prior to hospital discharge in 303 (22%) of 1387 consecutive patients enrolled in the TAMI 1 to 3 and 5 trials of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Bypass surgery was of emergency nature (less than 24 hours from treatment with intravenous thrombolytic therapy) in 36 (2.6%) and was deferred (greater than 24 hours) in 267 (19.3%) patients. The indications for bypass surgery included failed angioplasty (12%); left main or equivalent coronary disease (9%); complex or multivessel coronary disease (62%); recurrent postinfarction angina (13%); and refractory pump dysfunction, mitral regurgitation, ventricular septal rupture or abnormal predischarge functional test (1% each). Although patients having bypass surgery were older (59.5 +/- 9.8 versus 56.0 +/- 10.2 years, (p less than 0.0001), had more extensive coronary artery disease (46% with three-vessel disease versus 11%, (p less than 0.0001), had more frequent diabetes mellitus (19% versus 15%, (p = 0.048), had more prior infarctions (p less than 0.0001), had more severe initial depression in global left ventricular ejection fraction (48.0 +/- 11.9% versus 51.8 +/- 11.9%, p = 0.0002), and regional infarct zone (-2.7 +/- 0.94 versus -2.5 +/- 1.1 SD/chord, p = 0.02) and noninfarct zone function (-0.36 +/- 1.8 versus 0.43 +/- 1.6 SD/chord, p less than 0.0001) than patients not having coronary bypass surgery, no difference in the incidence of death in hospital (7% surgical versus 6% nonsurgical) or death at long-term follow-up of hospital survivors (7% surgical versus 6% nonsurgical) was noted between groups. Surgical patients demonstrated a greater degree of recovery in left ventricular ejection fraction (3.4 +/- 9.8% versus 0.16 +/- 8.5%, p = 0.036) and infarct zone regional function (0.71 +/- 1.1 versus 0.34 +/- 0.99 SD/chord, p = 0.001) when immediate (90 minutes following initiation of thrombolytic therapy) and predischarge (7 to 14 days after treatment) contrast left ventriculograms were compared than did patients who received only intravenous thrombolytic therapy with or without coronary angioplasty. These data suggest a beneficial influence of coronary bypass surgery on left ventricular function and possibly on the clinical outcome of patients initially treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.     

Coronary angiographic findings and troponin T in patients with unstable angina pectoris

This study sought to identify differences in coronary anatomic pathology in patients with unstable angina and elevated versus nonelevated serum troponin T values. Previous studies have shown a worse prognosis in unstable angina patients with elevated serum troponin T values. Consecutive patients (n = 117) with Braunwald class IIIB angina were included in the study. Serum samples for troponin T were obtained at admission and every 6 to 8 hours for 18 to 24 hours. Acute myocardial infarction was excluded by routine creatine kinase measurements. All patients underwent coronary angiography before discharge. Cardiac events including cardiac death and myocardial infarction were recorded. Two thirds of the patients with unstable angina had no increase in serum troponin T (<0.1 microg/L) (n = 80). They had a lower incidence of 3-vessel disease (26% vs 46%, p <0.001), left main disease (5% vs 16%, p = 0.04), visible thrombus (4% vs 22%, p = 0.006), and less severe stenosis of the culprit artery (65% vs 84%, p <0.004) than patients with elevated serum troponin T values (> or =0.1 microg/L) (n = 37). The 1-year cardiac event rate was 0% versus 19% in patients with troponin T values <0.1 microg/L compared with patients with serum troponin T values > or =0.1 microg/L (p <0.0001). It was concluded that patients with unstable angina and no release of troponin T have less severe coronary artery disease, and have an excellent prognosis. It is suggested that these patients may be managed more conservatively and without invasive evaluation before discharge.     

Acute coronary artery obstruction in myocardial infarction: overview of thrombolytic therapy

Pump failure, ranging from ventricular dysfunction to acute cardiogenic shock, is now the leading cause of cardiac death. Efforts at temporary mechanical or pharmacologic support of the heart have been largely unsuccessful so that attention is now directed toward prevention of ventricular failure and limitation of myocardial infarct size or even outright prevention of infarction itself. In particular, attention has been refocused on earlier reperfusion efforts with streptokinase. The effect of thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction on enzymatic infarct size, left ventricular function and early mortality was studied in subsets of patients in a randomized trial (Netherlands Interuniversity Cardiology Institute). Early thrombolytic therapy with intracoronary streptokinase (152 patients) or with intracoronary streptokinase preceded by intravenous streptokinase (117 patients) was compared with conventional treatment (264 patients). All 533 patients were admitted to the coronary care unit within 4 hours after onset of symptoms indicative of acute myocardial infarction. Of the patients eligible for this detailed analysis, 245 were allocated to thrombolytic therapy and 243 to conventional treatment. Early angiography was preformed in 212 of the 245 patients allocated to thrombolytic therapy. Patency of the infarct-related artery was achieved in 181 patients (85%). Enzymatic infarct size, measured from cumulative alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase release, was smaller in patients allocated to thrombolytic therapy (median 760 versus 1,179 U/liter in control subjects, p = 0.0001). Left ventricular ejection fraction measured by radionuclide angiography before discharge was higher after thrombolytic therapy (median 50% versus 43% in control subjects, p = 0.0001). Twelve month mortality was lower in patients allocated to thrombolytic therapy (8% versus 16% in the control group, p less than 0.01). In multivariate regression analysis infarct size limitation, improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction and 3 month mortality were predicted by sigma ST, time from onset of symptoms to admission and Killip class at admission. Thrombolysis was most useful in patients admitted within 2 hours after onset of symptoms and in patients with a sigma ST segment of 1.2 mV or more. On the other hand, no beneficial effects of streptokinase on enzymatic infarct size, left ventricular function or mortality were observed in the subset of patients with sigma ST less than 1.2 mV, admitted 2 to 4 hours after onset of symptoms.     

Ten-year incidence of myocardial infarction and prognosis after infarction. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

BACKGROUND. The 10-year incidence of myocardial infarction (fatal and nonfatal) and the prognosis after infarction were evaluated in 686 patients with stable angina who were randomly assigned to medical or surgical treatment in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS. Myocardial infarction was defined by either new Q wave findings or clinical symptoms compatible with myocardial infarction accompanied by serum enzyme elevations with or without electrocardiographic findings. Treatment comparisons were made according to original treatment assignment; 35% of the medical cohort had bypass surgery during the 10-year follow-up period. The overall cumulative infarction rate was somewhat higher in patients assigned to surgery (36%) than in medical patients (31%) (p = 0.13) due to perioperative infarctions (13%) and an accelerated infarction rate after the fifth year of follow-up (average, 2.4%/yr in the surgical group versus 1.4%/yr in the medical group). The 10-year cumulative incidence of death or myocardial infarction was also higher in surgical (54%) than in medical (49%) patients (p = 0.20). According to the Cox model, the estimated risk of death after infarction was 59% lower in surgical than in medical patients (p less than 0.0001). The reduction in postinfarction mortality with surgery was most striking in the first month after the event: 99% in the first month (p less than 0.0001) and 49% subsequently (p less than 0.0001). The estimated risk of death in the absence of infarction was nearly identical regardless of treatment (p = 0.75). Exclusion of perioperative infarctions did not alter the findings. CONCLUSIONS. Although surgery does not reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction overall, it does reduce the risk of mortality after infarction, particularly in the first 30 days after the event (fatal infarctions).     

Optimal utilization of thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: concepts and controversies

Timely administration of thrombolytic therapy decreases myocardial infarct size, lessens the incidence of congestive heart failure and improves survival. However, available data suggest that only 10% of patients with acute infarction in the United States receive thrombolytic drugs. Given the benefits of thrombolytic therapy, all patients with myocardial infarction would likely be treated were it not for associated risks. Several groups exist in which the risk/benefit ratio of thrombolytic therapy continues to be controversial, including those with inferior infarction, absence of ST segment elevation or presentation greater than 6 h from symptom onset, elderly patients and those with hypertension. Three recent thrombolytic trials reported a reduction in mortality that was entirely independent of infarct location. Pooled data from trials involving 12,000 patients with inferior infarction have demonstrated a reduction in mortality rate (6.8% versus 8.7%, p less than 0.0001). Furthermore, improvement in regional and global left ventricular function occurred after reperfusion therapy of inferior infarction. Pooled data indicate that patients treated between 6 and 24 h after symptom onset have a lower mortality rate than do those who receive placebo (11.1% versus 13.1%, p less than 0.001). Improved survival occurs after thrombolytic therapy in patients with ST segment elevation or left bundle branch block, but not in those with isolated ST depression or a normal electrocardiogram. Age should not be considered an absolute contraindication because the lifesaving potential of thrombolytic therapy in the elderly may be two to three times that of the overall group of patients with myocardial infarction. Finally, recent studies demonstrated that patients who present with hypotension or hypertension or who have undergone cardiopulmonary resuscitation may also benefit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical and prognostic implications of age in acute myocardial infarct]

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and the factors related to early mortality in the acute myocardial infarction of the geriatric population. We studied 814 consecutive patients with their first acute myocardial infarction admitted to the coronary care unit at tha Hospital General de Galicia. 401 patients were older than 65 years (Group A) and 413 were younger (Group B). Group A was found a significantly lower percentage of males (64.7% versus 88.4%; p less than 0.001) and smokers (46.7% versus 72.7%; p less than 0.001; and older patients showed a greater incidence of diabetes mellitus (28.1% versus 15.2%; p less than 0.001) and arterial hypertension (45.6% versus 31.7%; p less than 0.01). In the geriatric population, the clinical course of the acute myocardial infarction is characterized by a greater incidence of heart failure (35.3% versus 11.1%; p less than 0.001), cardiogenic shock (18% versus 5.7%; p less than 0.001) and post-acute myocardial infarction angina pectoris (18.3% versus 12.2%; p less than 0.05). Early mortality (first month) was significantly higher in elderly patients (22.7% versus 6.3%; p less than 0.001). The multivariate analysis by stepwise logistic regression identified cardiogenic shock, age and heart failure as the only independent predictive variables for early mortality. We conclude that early mortality in the acute myocardial infarction is high and related to severe degrees of pump failure and age.     

Immediate coronary angioplasty versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction: Left ventricular ejection fraction,hospital mortality and reinfarction

Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to compare intravenous Streptokinase therapy with immediate coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy with regard to left ventricular function and hospital mortality and reinfarction.Background. Despite the widespread use of intravenous thrombolytic therapy and immediate percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, these two strategies to treat patients with an acute myocardial infarction have only recently been compared in randomized trials. Coronary angioplasty has been shown to result In a higher patency rate of the Infant-related coronary artery, with a less severe residual stenotic lesion, compared with streptokinase therapy, but whether this more favorable coronary anatomy results in clinical benefit remair to be established.Methods. We studied 301 patients with acute myocardial infarction randomly assigned to undergo immediate coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy or to receive intravenous streptokinase therapy. Before discharge left ventricular ejection fraction was measured by radionuclide scanning.Results. The in-hospital mortality rate in the streptokinase group was 7% (11 of 149 patients) compared with 2% (3 of 152 patients) in the angioplasty group (p = 0.024). In the streptokinase group recurrent myocardial infarction occurred in 15 patients (10%) versus in 2 (1%) in the angioplasty group (p < 0.001). Either death or nonfatal reinfarction occurred in 23 patients (15%) in the streptokinase group and in 5 patients (3%) in the angioplasty group (p = 0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction was 44 ± 11% (mean ± SD) in the streptokinase group versus 50 ± 11% in the angioplasty group (p < 0.001).Conclusions. These findings indicate that immediate coronary angioplasty without antecedent thrombolytic therapy results in better left ventricular function and lower risk of death and recurrent myocardial infarction than treatment with intravenous streptokinase.     

Risk factors and clinical angiographical characteristics of myocardial infarction in women.

INTRODUCTION: Myocardial infarction has a higher incidence in men. However, in women, although less frequent, it has a worse prognosis. OBJECTIVE: With the present work we aim to define the clinical and angiographical characteristics and evolution of myocardial infarction in women compared with men. METHODOLOGY: We studied 235 sequential inpatients with acute myocardial infarction in the Intensive Care Unit who underwent post-infarction catheterization. We then compared female with male patients in terms of risk factors, location and type of infarction, coronary morphology and post-infarction complications. RESULTS: About 22% of the patients hospitalized following myocardial infarction were female. The women were older than the men (65.9 +/- 11.2 vs. 60.3 +/- 11.9; p < 0.01), and had a higher prevalence of high blood pressure (71% vs. 54%, p < 0.05) and a lower prevalence of smoking (19% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). Post-infarction angina was more frequent in women (50% vs. 23%, p < 0.001). Neither Q-wave versus non-Q wave myocardial infarction nor its location were significantly different between the sexes. In terms of coronary morphology, myocardial infarction without significant lesions was more frequent in women (10% vs. 3%, p < 0.05) and there were no significant.     

梗死前心绞痛对女性急性前壁心肌梗死的保护作用研究

目的　观察梗死前心绞痛对女性急性前壁心肌梗死有无保护作用。方法　选择女性急性前壁心肌梗死 98例 ,有梗死前心绞痛者为A组 ( 4 8例 )、无梗死前心绞痛为B组 ( 5 0例 ) ,行心电图、心肌酶、超声心动图、核素心血池等检查。对心电图QRS积分值、心肌酶峰峰值、左室射血分数、心源性休克、室壁瘤形成及短期病死率进行比较。结果　B组心肌梗死患者QRS积分值、心肌酶峰值、心源性休克、室壁瘤形成及 1个月病死率明显高于A组 ,P <0 .0 5 ,左室射血分数明显低于A组 ,P <0 .0 5。结论　梗死前 2 4小时内心绞痛可减低女性急性心肌梗死患者QRS积分值、保护心功能、降低短期病死率     

Effect of infarct location on myocardial salvage assessed by technetium-99m isonitrile.

To investigate the influence of infarct location on myocardial salvage, technetium-99m isonitrile was injected into 43 patients with a first myocardial infarction before early reperfusion therapy. Primary coronary angioplasty was performed in 22 patients and successful intravenous thrombolytic therapy was given to 15 patients, both within 6 h of the onset of chest pain. Patency of the infarct-related artery was confirmed by angiography in all 37 patients. In the remaining six patients (three with and three without early thrombolytic therapy) the infarct-related artery remained occluded. Single photon emission computed tomography was performed within 6 h of the administration of technetium-99m isonitrile and repeated at the time of hospital discharge. Radionuclide ejection fraction at discharge was significantly lower for patients with anterior infarction (0.41 +/- 0.12) than for those with inferior infarction (0.56 +/- 0.09, p less than 0.001). Early perfusion defect size, a measure of myocardium at risk, was greater in patients with anterior than in those with inferior infarction (52 +/- 9% vs. 18 +/- 10% of the left ventricle, p = 0.0001) as was final defect size (30 +/- 20% vs. 9 +/- 8%, p less than 0.01). The change in myocardial perfusion, an estimate of myocardial salvage, was also greater in patients with anterior infarction (24 +/- 16% vs. 10 +/- 7%, p less than 0.01). However, the proportion of jeopardized myocardium salvaged (salvage index) was not significantly different between patients with anterior or inferior infarction (0.49 +/- 0.34 vs. 0.59 +/- 0.35, p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Smoking and prognosis after acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era (Israeli thrombolytic national survey)

Objectives. This study sought to compare the relation between smoking and the 30-day and 6-month outcome after acute myocardial infarction in an Israeli nationwide survey.Background. Studies before and during the thrombolytic era reported similar or lower early mortality after acute myocardial infarction in smokers than in nonsmokers. This finding is intriguing and may be misleading because numerous epidemiologic studies have clearly shown that smoking is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction and death.Methods. The study cohort comprised 999 consecutive patients with an acute myocardial infarction from a prospective nationwide survey conducted during January and February 1994 in all coronary care units operating in Israel. The prognosis of 367 patients (37%) who were smokers (current smokers and those who smoked up to 1 month before admission) was compared with that of 632 nonsmokers (past smokers or those who never smoked).Results. Smokers were on average 10 years younger and were more frequently men and patients with a family history of coronary heart disease and inferior infarction and less frequently patients with a previous infarction or a history of angina, hypertension and diabetes than nonsmokers. Smokers also had a lower incidence of congestive heart failure on admission or during the hospital period. Thrombolytic therapy (49% vs. 40%, p < 0.01) and aspirin (89% vs. 80%, p < 0.001) were administered more frequently in smokers than nonsmokers. The crude 30-day (6.0% vs. 15.7%) and cumulative 6-month (7.9% vs. 21.5%) mortality rates were significantly lower (p < 0.0001 for both) in smokers than nonsmokers, respectively. However, after adjustment for age, baseline characteristics, thrombolytic therapy and invasive coronary procedures, the lower 30-day (odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 1.29, p = 0.30) and 6-month (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.30, p = 0.42) mortality rates in smokers and nonsmokers were not significantly different. The model had a power of 0.80 for OR 0.50, with alpha 0.1.Conclusions. In our nationwide survey, the seemingly better prognosis of smokers early after acute myocardial infarction was no longer evident after adjustment for baseline and clinical variables and may be explained by their younger age and a more favorable risk profile. Smokers develop acute myocardial infarction a decade earlier than nonsmokers. Efforts to lower the prevalence of smoking should continue.     

Role of previous angina pectoris and collateral flow to preserve left ventricular function in the presence or absence of myocardial infarction in isolated total occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery

The aim of this study was to determine whether previous angina pectoris and collateral circulation influenced myocardial function after isolated coronary occlusion. In 58 consecutive patients, coronary angiography showed a complete isolated occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery; 43 patients (74%) had previous myocardial infarction. Duration of previous angina pectoris was defined as the time from the first ischemic symptom to the date of myocardial infarction or of coronary angiography in the absence of myocardial infarction. Left ventricular ejection fraction was measured on the 30 degrees right anterior oblique projection of the left ventricular angiogram. Collateral circulation was graded as follows: none or filling limited to side branches (group 1) and partial or complete filling of the epicardial arterial segment (group 2). Group 2 (40 patients) had higher ejection fraction (57 vs 38%; p less than 0.0001) and longer duration of previous angina pectoris (11 vs 0.1 months; p less than 0.002) than group 1 (18 patients). A longer duration of previous angina pectoris probably allows collateral development before coronary occlusion in 1-vessel coronary artery disease, thereby limiting myocardial damage.     

Coronary artery stenting in the elderly: short-term outcome and long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up

Objectives. This study sought to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery stenting with those of younger patients and to determine the long-term clinical outcome and survival of elderly patients post stent implantation.Background. Elderly patients undergoing coronary revascularization are considered a high-risk group. Few data exist that relate the results of stenting in treating coronary artery disease in the elderly population.Methods. All elderly patients ≥75 years of age who underwent coronary artery stenting between March 1993 and July 1997 (n = 137) at our center were compared to the patients <75 who underwent coronary artery stenting during the same time period (n = 2,551). Long-term clinical follow-up and survival were determined for the elderly group.Results. Elderly patients presented with lower ejection fractions (54% vs. 58%, p = 0.0001), more unstable angina (47% vs. 28%, p = 0.0001), and more multivessel disease (78% vs. 62%, p = 0.0001) than younger patients. These older patients had higher rates of procedure related complications including procedural myocardial infarction (MI) (2.9% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.2), emergency CABG (3.7% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.04), and death (2.2% vs. 0.12%, p = 0.0001). Angiographic follow-up, obtained in both groups, demonstrated significantly higher restenosis rates in the elderly versus younger patients (47% vs. 28%, p = 0.0007). Longer term clinical follow-up, which was obtained only in the elderly group, showed that at a mean follow-up period of 12 months post coronary stenting, elderly survival free from death, MI, revascularization and angina was 54% and that their overall survival was 91%. Subanalysis of the elderly patients who died showed much higher incidence of combined unstable angina (80%), prior MI (60%), lower ejection fraction (46%), multivessel disease (100%) and complex lesions (100%) than the overall group.Conclusions. Elderly patients who undergo coronary artery stenting have significantly higher rates of procedural complications and worse six month outcomes than younger patients, especially those who present with combined unstable angina, history of MI, EF < 50%, multivessel disease and complex lesions. Overall survival in the elderly population at 12 months postcoronary artery stenting was 91% and event-free survival was 54%.     

Left ventricular function after myocardial infarction: clinical and angiographic correlations

There is a paucity of information correlating the angiographic findings immediately after myocardial infarction with the clinical status before infarction. Therefore, the coronary anatomy, collateral circulation and quantitative left ventricular function were studied in 39 patients who underwent angiography within 3 weeks of a first transmural myocardial infarction. In all patients, the vessel supplying the infarct was totally occluded at the time of angiography. Patients without angina before infarction (Group I) had fewer coronary obstructions than did patients with a long history of angina before infarction (Group II) (1.5 +/- 0.5 versus 2.5 +/- 0.5, respectively, p less than 0.001) but worse overall and regional left ventricular function. These paradoxical differences between Groups I and II were evident in patients with anterior as well as inferior infarction. Patients in Group I had significantly lower collateral scores than did patients in Group II (0.6 +/- 0.8 versus 1.9 +/- 0.9, respectively, p less than 0.0001) and 13 of 22 patients in Group I had no collateral vessels compared with only 1 of 17 in Group II (p less than 0.001). Partial preservation of anterior wall function in Group II patients with anterior infarction was related both to the presence of collateral vessels and to the more distal obstruction of the left anterior descending coronary artery in these patients as compared with patients with anterior infarction in Group I. In contrast, in patients with inferior wall infarction, no relation could be found between the presence of collateral vessels and regional left ventricular function, although only two patients in this series with inferior infarction did not have collateral vessels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Unstable angina: individualized stratification and prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the methodology of risk stratification and the prognosis of patients admitted with unstable angina. POPULATION AND METHODS: This retrospective study involved a population of 68 patients (43 males and 25 females with a mean age of 65.8 +/- 9.8 years) consecutively admitted for suspected unstable angina during the year of 1996. Thirty six patients (52.9%) had angina at rest, 13 patients (19.1%) had both exertional and rest angina, 9 patients (13.2%) crescendo angina, 6 patients (8.8%) new onset exertional angina (less than 1 month), and 4 patients (5.8%) post-infarction angina (less than 2 weeks). The risk stratification was individualized. The coronary angiography (35 patients) was only performed when the medical therapy failed in patients with recurrent angina, or with proved ischemia after an exercise test and/or thallium 201 stress scintigraphy. Thirteen patients (19.1%) did not undergo these tests (advanced age and or bad general condition, or refusal). The follow-up of patients with and without ST-T changes was compared, as well as those revascularized versus non-revascularized. It was possible to achieve a mean follow-up of 13.7 +/- 6.2 months (3 to 25 months). RESULTS: The exercise test and/or thallium-201 stress scintigraphy were positive for myocardial ischemia in 28 pts (41.1%) and negative in 7 patients (10.2%). The coronary angiography revealed three-vessel coronary artery disease in 18 patients (26.4%), one vessel disease in 11 patients (16.1%) and two-vessel disease in 5 patients (7.3%). One patient had normal coronary arteries. Medical therapy was the initial approach. Coronary surgery was urgently performed in 3 patients and coronary angioplasty in 5 patients for refractory unstable angina. In the whole group coronary artery surgery was undertaken in 14 patients (20.5%) and coronary angioplasty in 12 patients (17.6%). A mean follow-up of 13.7 +/- 6.2 months was obtained in the 68 patients. During this period 6 patients (8.8%) died due to cardiac causes and 16 patients (23.5%) were readmitted: 8 patients (11.7%) for unstable angina, 5 patients (7.3%) for congestive heart failure and 3 patients (4.4%) for myocardial infarction. Fifty two patients (76.4%) remained free of cardiac events. The patients with transitory ST-T changes had more cardiac events (unstable angina, myocardial infarction, mortality) than the patients without ECG changes (13/30 vs 2/30, p = 0.003). When the revascularized patients were compared to the non revascularized no significant differences were observed regarding myocardial infarction and mortality, however revascularized pts had a less significant incidence of rehospitalization for unstable angina (0/26 vs 8/42 p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: An individualized strategy can be effective in pts with unstable angina. In this study 76.4% of patients remained free of cardiac events during the follow-up, 23.6% had severe cardiac events and the cardiac mortality was 8.8%. The patients with transitory ST-T changes had more cardiac events and worse prognosis. No patients significant difference was observed in the revascularized versus non revascularized patients for myocardial infarction and mortality; however, the revascularized patients had less significant incidence of rehospitalization for unstable angina.