Inclusion of spleen in pediatric multivisceral transplantation

Inclusion of the donor spleen may be beneficial for small children who receive multivisceral transplantation (MVT) because asplenia is associated with increased risk of bacterial sepsis. Beginning in 2003, the spleen was transplanted together with multivisceral transplantation in 17 children under daclizumab induction (spleen group). The results were compared to 23 children who received multivisceral transplantation without the spleen (control group) with the same immunosuppression regimen. Median age of 17 patients who received a spleen was 0.80 years (range 0.54-1.66). Platelet counts at 30 and 60 days posttransplant were significantly lower in the spleen group (average values: day 30: 399,000 vs 636,000, P = .015; day 60: 413,000 vs 622,000, P = .0056). WBC counts at 30 and 60 days posttransplant were also decreased in the spleen group but the difference was not statistically significant. Median rejection-free survival was 205 days in the spleen group and 101 days in the control group (P = NS). Median length of hospital stay was 39 days in the spleen group and 61 days in the control group. With a median follow-up of 398 days (spleen group) and 1232 days (control group), 3 of 17 (17%) in the spleen group developed graft versus host disease (GVHD), whereas 1 of 23 (4.5%) in control group did (P = NS). In one patient in each group, GVHD was fatal. No patient developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in the spleen group, whereas 4 of 23 (17%) in the control group developed PTLD. One-year patient survival was 84% in the spleen group and 86% in the control group. Recipients of the spleen as part of a multivisceral graft had significantly lower platelet counts. Rejection-free survival may be prolonged, but the risk of GVHD may be increased.     

Renal transplantation in end-stage sickle cell nephropathy

BACKGROUND: The role of renal transplantation as treatment for end-stage sickle cell nephropathy (SCN) has not been well established. METHODS: We performed a comparative investigation of patient and allograft outcomes among age-matched African-American kidney transplant recipients with ESRD as a result of SCN (n=82) and all other causes (Other-ESRD, n=22,565). RESULTS: The incidence of delayed graft function and predischarge acute rejection in SCN group (24% and 26%) was similar to that observed in the Other-ESRD group (29% and 27%). The mean discharge serum creatinine (SCr) was 2.7 (+/-2.5) mg/dl in the SCN recipients compared to 3.0 (+/-2.5) mg/dl in the Other-ESRD recipients (P=0.42). There was no difference in the 1-year cadaveric graft survival (SCN: 78% vs. Other-ESRD: 77%), and the multivariable adjusted 1-year risk of graft loss indicated no significant effect of SCN (relative risk [RR]=1.39, P=0.149). However, the 3-year cadaveric graft survival tended to be lower in the SCN group (48% vs. 60%, P=0.055) and their adjusted 3-year risk of graft loss was significantly greater (RR= 1.60, P=0.003). There was a trend toward improved survival in the SCN transplant recipients compared to their dialysis-treated, wait-listed counterparts (RR=0.14, P=0.056). In comparison to the Other-ESRD (RR=1.00), the adjusted mortality risk in the SCN group was higher both at 1 year (RR=2.95, P=0.001) and at 3 years (RR=2.82, P=0.0001) after renal transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term renal allograft result in recipients with end-stage SCN was similar to that obtained in other causes of ESRD, but the long-term outcome was comparatively diminished. There was a trend toward better patient survival with renal transplantation relative to dialysis in end-stage SCN.     

Improved survival of primary cadaveric renal allografts in blacks with quadruple immunosuppression.

Black recipients of cadaveric kidneys have been shown to have a lower rate of allograft survival than whites. Data were reviewed from 642 primary cadaveric transplants: results in 276 patients (163 white and 113 black) (group 1) who had received triple therapy (azathioprine-CsA-prednisone, 1985-87) were compared with those in 366 patients (180 white and 186 black) (group 2) receiving quadruple immunosuppression (MALG-azathioprine-CsA-prednisone, 1987-90). Blacks in group 2 had better patient (97% vs. 91%, P = 0.03) and graft (77% vs. 55%, P = 0.0002) survival at 1 year than in group 1. There was no difference in these parameters among whites in either group. Racial differences in graft survival noted in group 1 disappeared in group 2. While HLA BDR matching improved in group 2 patients (P = 0.0001), whites received better matched kidneys than blacks in both groups (P = 0.001). HLA matching was associated with improved graft survival only in white recipients of 4 BDR-matched kidneys. In group 1, more blacks than whites had at least one episode of acute rejection (76% vs. 57%, P = 0.001); blacks also lost more grafts to acute and chronic rejection. In group 2, there were no racial differences in the number of rejection episodes or immunologic graft losses. Of 14 potential variables examined by parametric analysis, only quadruple therapy significantly reduced risk of graft loss in blacks. Quadruple immunosuppression improved primary cadaveric renal allograft survival in black recipients, abrogating previously noted racial differences.     

Effect of panel-reactive antibody positivity on graft rejection before or after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Because it is well known that kidney transplant recipients with preformed lymphocytotoxic antibodies against HLA antigens have increased graft rejection rates, a serological crossmatch is routinely performed before kidney transplantation. But, the presence of these antibodies is not routinely monitored after transplantation. We investigated the panel-reactive antibody (PRA) response to know whether variations before or after kidney transplantation were associated with graft rejection. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed sera from 350 renal allograft recipients from September 1998 to March 2003. Pretransplantation and posttransplantation sera at 3 or 5 weeks postoperatively were tested in PRA. Recipients were stratified into 3 groups according to their PRA levels group I, PRA = 0; group II, PRA = less than 50%, and group III, PRA = more than 50%. RESULTS: The total graft rejection rate among 350 recipients was 9.4% (n = 33). Twenty-four pretransplantation PRA-positive recipients had a graft rejection rate of 20.8% (n = 5), compared with an 8.6% (n = 28) rate among 326 pretransplantation PRA-negative recipients. Six of 24 posttransplantation PRA-positive recipients (25%) experienced a graft rejection versus 27 (8.3%) of 326 posttransplantation PRA-negative subjects. Among the pretransplantation PRA stratae, the rejection rate in group III was 25% (1 of 4) versus 20% (4 of 20) in group II and 8.6% (28 of 326) in group I (P < .05). According to the postransplantation PRA level, 37.5% (3 of 8) in group III versus 18.8% (3 of 16) in group II and 8.3% (27 of 326) in group I (P < .05) had a graft rejection. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that the PRA response pretransplantation and in the early posttransplantation period correlates with the kidney allograft rejection rate.     

An essential role for natural killer cells in augmentation of allograft survival mediated by donor spleen cells

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that skin allograft survival can be augmented by the administration of donor spleen or donor bone marrow in antithymocyte serum (ATS) treated recipients. Because natural killer cells (NK) have been reported to possess immunoregulatory properties, we investigated whether the ability of donor spleen or bone marrow cells to enhance allograft survival was dependent on the presence of donor NK cells. METHODS: Recipient (C57BL/6 x A/J)F1 strain mice (H2 haplotypes Kb/k, Ab/k, E-/k, Db/d) were treated with ATS on days -1 and +2 relative transplantation of a C3H (H-2k) skin allograft. On day +7, each recipient was randomly assigned to one of the following groups that received i.v. donor C3H cell infusions via the tail vein: 1) 5.0x10(7) wild-type donor spleen cells (SPC); 2) 5.0x10(7) spleen cells from C3H/HeJ-Lystbg-2J/+ mice (commonly called beige mice and have selectively impaired NK cell function); 3) 2.5x10(7) wild-type donor bone marrow cells (BMC); 4) 2.5x10(7)beige C3H bone marrow cells; and 5) no donor cell infusion (ATS controls). In another experiment, each recipient was randomly assigned to one of the following groups that received injections of: 1) 4.75x10(7) spleen cells depleted of NK cells; 2) 2.5x10(6) purified splenic NK cells; 3) a coinfusion of 5.0x10(7) beige spleen cells and 2.5x10(6) purified wild-type splenic NK cells. RESULTS: Recipients infused with wild-type SPC exhibited significant augmentation of allograft survival compared with ATS controls. However, graft survival was reduced in recipients that were infused with spleen cells from beige mice compared with recipients infused with wild-type SPC (median survival time (MST): 38 vs. 92 days, P=0.02). In contrast, infusions of beige BMC augmented allograft survival as well as wild-type BMC (MST: 47 vs. 49 days, P=0.76). Furthermore, the ability of wild-type SPC to augment allograft survival was abrogated by the depletion of NK cells (MST=92 vs. 34 days, respectively, P=0.005). The co-infusion of beige SPC and purified splenic NK cells enhanced allograft survival as well as wild-type SPC (MST=56 days, P=0.65). Finally, recipients infused with purified NK cells did not experience increased graft survival compared to recipients that received no infusion (MST=29 vs. 33 days, respectively, P=0.6). CONCLUSIONS: Donor splenic NK cells are necessary, but not sufficient, for the extension of graft survival by infusion of donor splenocytes, suggesting that they may work in concert with another cell-type. In contrast, the extension of graft survival by donor bone marrow does not depend on the presence of donor NK cells.     

Evaluation of posttransplantation soluble CD30 for diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Posttransplantation measurement of soluble CD30 (sCD30) may be useful for identifying kidney graft recipients at risk of impending graft rejection in the early posttransplantation period. METHODS: We measured plasma sCD30 levels and evaluated the levels in relation to the diagnosis of rejection. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated that on posttransplantation days 3 to 5, sCD30 allowed a differentiation of recipients who subsequently developed acute allograft rejection (n=25) from recipients with an uncomplicated course (n=20, P<0.0001) (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.96, specificity 100%, sensitivity 88%) and recipients with acute tubular necrosis in the absence of rejection (n=11, P=0.001) (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.85, specificity 91%, sensitivity 72%). CONCLUSIONS: sCD30 measured on posttransplantation days 3 to 5 offers a noninvasive means for differentiating patients with impending acute allograft rejection from patients with an uncomplicated course or with acute tubular necrosis.     

Mycophenolate mofetil substitution for cyclosporine a in renal transplant recipients with chronic progressive allograft dysfunction: the "creeping creatinine" study

BACKGROUND: This study determined whether cyclosporine A (CsA)-treated renal allograft recipients with deteriorating renal function ("creeping creatinine") secondary to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) benefit from the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to their immunosuppressive regimen, followed by withdrawal of CsA. METHODS: In a controlled, open, multicenter study, CsA-treated renal allograft recipients with progressively deteriorating renal function were randomized to have their CsA discontinued with the concomitant addition of MMF to their regimen (group A) or to continue treatment with CsA (group B). The primary endpoint was the response rate over the 6-month period after withdrawal of CsA in group A or the equivalent time in group B. Response was defined as a stabilization or reduction of serum creatinine (SCr), as evidenced by a flattening or positive slope of the 1/SCr plot and no graft loss. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of acute rejection, graft and patient survival, and changes in selected metabolic parameters. RESULTS: The response rate in the primary intent-to-treat population (n=122) was 58% (36/62) in group A versus 32% (19/60) in group B (P=0.0060). The corresponding percentages of responders in the per-protocol population (n=107) were 60% (36/60) and 26% (12/47), respectively (P=0.0008). There were no acute rejections in group A during the study period. Patients in this group also experienced a significant decrease in total cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with progressively deteriorating renal function secondary to CAN, addition of MMF followed by withdrawal of CsA results in a significant improvement in transplant function without the risk of acute rejection.     

Elimination of acute GVHD and prolongation of rat pancreas allograft survival with DST cyclosporine, and spleen transplantation

Allogeneic spleen transplantation has been shown to have a tolerizing effect on pancreas allograft survival in rats. In this study we examined the effect of blood transfusions and cyclosporine administration on both rat pancreas allograft survival and acute graft-versus-host disease in BN recipients of Lewis pancreas-spleen allografts. We found that in this strain combination significant pancreas allograft prolongation occurred when the spleen was included en bloc with the pancreas graft. However, 50% of these recipients developed GVHD and died. A single donor-specific transfusion delivered to BN recipients of Lewis pancreas and pancreas-spleen allografts did not extend graft survival, but precluded the development of GVHD. A short, 6-day, and long, 26-day, course of CsA to recipients of pancreas and pancreas-spleen allografts extended graft and animal survival times, although not indefinitely. All pancreas-spleen recipients of both CsA protocols died following acute GVHD. Combined DST and CsA (short and long-course) administration in pancreas-only allograft recipients was deleterious to graft survival, compared with CsA administration alone. However, in pancreas-spleen recipients, combined DST and CsA had an additive effect. Moreover, in DST and long-course CsA-treated pancreas-spleen recipients, indefinite graft survival occurred with no signs of acute GVHD. The beneficial effect of the spleen allograft on pancreas graft survival was not dependent upon GVHD, since splenic-induced prolongation of pancreas graft survival was observed in the F1-donor to parent-recipient combination.     

Pregnancy in kidney transplant recipients

PURPOSE: Our aim was to investigate kidney allograft, obstetric, and maternal outcomes in pregnant women undergoing kidney transplantation in our center. METHODS: Retrospective data on 74 pregnancies in 60 patients were reviewed and completed through phone interviews were compared with information on a control group of female kidney recipients. RESULTS: Mean age of patients at transplantation was 26.55 +/- 4.72 years and the median interval between transplantation and pregnancy was 27.5 months. Gestational period was 8 months. Live birth was the outcome in 43.2% of pregnancies; 9.5% led to still birth, 24.3% were aborted, and obstetrical data of the remaining were unavailable. Among the 11 patients who became pregnant within 12 months after transplantation, we observed seven live births and four abortions. None of pregnancies that were accompanied by acute rejection episodes (ARE) were successful. Twenty-six patients experienced at least one ARE versus 23 patients of the control group (P = NS). However, the first ARE occurred later in the pregnant group (P = .028). Chronic rejection and graft loss were seen in 24 and 18 study group cases and 17 and 17 control cases, respectively (P = NS). One-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year graft survivals were 100%, 96.5%, 94.5%, and 77.1% in the pregnant group versus 93.2%, 85.7%, 81%, and 64.7% in the control group, respectively (P = .07). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy in kidney recipients seems to be safe for kidney allograft recipients even within the first year posttransplant. Nonetheless, the outcomes of pregnancy in this group of patients is not always favorable, especially when rejection occurs simultaneously.     

Factor V R506Q mutation (activated protein C resistance) is an additional risk factor for early renal graft loss associated with acute vascular rejection

BACKGROUND: The factor V R506Q mutation (FV R506Q, FV:Q506, or FV Leiden) resulting in activated protein C (APC) resistance is the most common inherited risk factor for venous thrombosis, including in renal transplant recipients. We investigated a possible association between the FV mutation and early renal graft loss, and the prevalence of macro- and microvascular thrombosis, endothelialitis, and fibrinoid vascular necrosis by FV genotype. METHOD: One hundred and nine renal allograft recipients were genotyped for FV mutation. A vascular rejection subgroup of patients (n=29) had experienced at least one episode of vascular rejection, or graft thrombosis. A second group of patients (n=80) had experienced no acute rejection and retained a well-functioning graft. RESULTS: The prevalence of APC resistance was numerically but not statistically significantly higher in the vascular rejection group (17.2%) compared with the group without rejection episodes (7.5%) (P=0.16). There was a significant association between the presence or absence of FV mutation and graft survival, with a 55.6% 1-year graft survival rate versus a 76.4% rate, respectively (P=0.02). The prevalence of vascular rejection, as evidenced by endothelialitis or fibrinoid vascular necrosis, was significantly associated with APC resistance but macro- or microvascular thrombosis were not. CONCLUSION: Renal transplant recipients who are carriers of the FV:Q506 allele have an increased risk of early graft loss. Vascular rejection changes including endothelialitis and fibrinoid vascular necrosis were more common in this group, and therefore an association between the hypercoagulable state, which entails an up-regulation of the mitogenic and proinflammatory enzyme thrombin, and the immunological challenge to the endothelium may be the cause of inferior prognosis in these patients.     

Rejection episodes and 3-year graft survival under sirolimus and tacrolimus treatment after adult intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE: Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have been recently introduced in clinical practice after intestinal transplantation. We focused on Sirolimus (Rapamycin) to examine effects on rejection and graft survival following intestinal transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty isolated intestinal recipients and 5 multivisceral patients (2 with liver) in our series were divided into 3 groups: patients started on Sirolimus (because of nephrotoxicity or biopsy-proven rejection), who continued therapy longer than 3 months (n = 11); patients started on Sirolimus (because of nephrotoxicity or biopsy-proven rejection), who received therapy less than 3 months because of side effects (n = 4); and a control group, who never received rapamycin (n = 10). RESULTS: During prolonged treatment combined with Tacrolimus (Prograf), both Sirolimus groups showed a decreased number of acute cellular rejections (P < .01). Cumulative 3-year graft and patient survival rates were 81% in the Sirolimus greater than 3 months group, 100% in the Sirolimus less than 3 months group, and 80% and 90% in the control group, respectively (P = .63 and P = .62). CONCLUSION: In our experience, the use of mTOR-inhibitors in combination with calcineurin-inhibitors seemed to be more effective than monotherapy to reduce the number of rejections. Side effects can limit its use as maintenance therapy.     

Transplanting kidneys from CMV-seropositive donors to CMV-seronegative recipients is not associated with poorer renal allograft function or survival.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative recipients of renal allografts from CMV-seropositive donors (D+/R-) have a higher rate of acute rejection than other renal transplant recipients. A relationship between CMV infection/disease and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) has been proposed from animal studies, although human studies have been inconclusive. The objective of this study was to determine if CMV seromatching has an effect on renal allograft function and allograft survival. METHODS: A retrospective single centre study was carried out in 333 first cadaveric transplant recipients from January 1, 1991 to December 31, 1997. The primary end-point was creatinine clearance at 3 years post-transplant in groups based on CMV seromatching. The secondary end-point was renal allograft survival. RESULTS: Mean creatinine clearance 3 years post-transplant was 53.4 ml/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area. There was no significant difference in the mean creatinine clearance for groups formed on the basis of CMV seromatching. Delayed graft function and acute rejection were associated with a lower creatinine clearance at 3 years and reduced overall graft survival [hazard ratios 2.35 (1.56-3.54) (P<0.001) and 1.57 (1.0-2.46) (P = 0.046), respectively]. Considering the end-point of graft loss due to acute rejection (censoring for death with a functioning graft) identified the D+/R- group as having an increased hazard of graft loss due to acute rejection [hazard ratio 3.12 (1.16-8.57) (P = 0.024)]. CONCLUSIONS: The D+/R- group does not appear to have poorer renal allograft function 3 years post-transplant. This group does, however, have an increased risk of early allograft loss due to acute rejection.     

Comparison of transplanted kidney function in patients on two different doses of mycophenolate mofetil

INTRODUCTION: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressant that is widely used in renal transplant recipients, is associated with several dose-dependent hematologic and gastrointestinal side effects that lead to drug dose reduction or even discontinuation. The aim of this study was to compare the renal function and acute rejection rates of kidney allograft recipients who were on two different mycophenolate mofetil doses. METHODS: In a prospective study, 59 allograft kidney recipients who were on MMF 2 g/d were randomly selected and followed for evidences of acute rejection or drug side effects. Four patients were excluded from the study due to noncompliance, graft loss, and patient loss from opportunistic infection. Of the remaining 55 patients, 22 patients (40%) underwent MMF dose reduction to 1.35 +/- 0.23 g/d due to perceived side effects or economic reasons (group 1). The mean time for this change was 4.2 +/- 2.1 months after the kidney transplantation. The remaining patients (group 2, n = 33, 60%) had no change in MMF 2 g/d drug dosage. All patients were followed for at least 30 months after transplantation. Renal function tests (blood urea and serum creatinine) were measured monthly. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.0 (Student t test). A P value < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable regarding age, gender, other immunosuppressive medications, and the time after transplantation. There were no episodes of acute rejection in group 1 after MMF dose reduction. The renal function (blood urea or serum creatinine levels) was comparable between the two groups at the end of study (P = .846 and .610, respectively). CONCLUSION: MMF dose reduction was not associated with an increased risk of acute renal allograft rejection or impaired graft function.     

Immune responses in small intestinal transplantation in the rat: correlation of histopathology and monocyte procoagulant activity

No predictive serologic marker exists for rejection or graft versus host disease (GVHD) reactions in small intestinal transplantation (SIT). SIT was performed in Lewis (Lew) and Lew X Brown Norway Fl hybrid (LBN) rats in the following combinations: group 1, Lew X Lew; group 2 (isolated rejection), LBN X Lew, and group 3 (isolated GVHD), Lew X LBN. Procoagulant activity (PCA), an index of monocyte immune activation, was measured in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of graft recipients to assess its value as an immunologic monitor. Histologic findings and PCA were evaluated on days 1, 2, and 3 and every 2 to 3 days after SIT. No pathologic findings of graft or host tissue developed in group 1 (n = 14). Histologic rejection (blunted villi and mononuclear cell infiltration) was seen beginning on day 5 in group 2 (n = 19); early GVHD (loss of nodal and splenic architecture) was first noted on days 5 and 6 in group 3 (n = 17). PCA elevation in SIT was seen to precede histologic evidence of rejection or graft versus host disease in this model and may constitute an important marker for these immunologic events.     

Risk factors for chronic rejection after pediatric liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Chronic rejection is a major cause of graft failure and a frequent reason for retransplantation after pediatric liver transplantation. Identification of risk factors for chronic rejection in pediatric transplant recipients is vital to understanding the pathogenesis of chronic rejection and may help prevent further graft loss. METHODS: The study population consisted of 285 children with 385 liver transplants performed at University of Chicago between 1991 and 1999. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for chronic rejection, including age, sex, race, type of graft (living related vs. cadaveric), native liver disease, acute rejection episodes, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). RESULTS: The chronic rejection rate was significantly lower in recipients of living-related grafts than in recipients of cadaveric grafts (4% vs. 16%, P=0.001). African-American recipients had a significantly higher rate of chronic rejection than did Caucasian recipients (26% vs. 8%, P<0.001). Numbers of acute rejection episodes, transplantation for autoimmune disease, occurrence of PTLD, and CMV infection were also significant risk factors for chronic rejection. However, recipient age, gender, donor-recipient gender mismatch, and donor-recipient ethnicity mismatch were not associated with higher incidence of chronic rejection CONCLUSION: We have identified a number of risk factors for chronic rejection in a large group of pediatric liver allograft recipients. We believe that donor-recipient matching for gender or race is not likely to reduce the incidence of chronic rejection. The elucidation of the mechanisms by which living-related liver transplantation affords protection against chronic rejection may provide insight into the immunogenetics of chronic rejection and help prevent further graft loss.     

Immediate graft function positively affects long-term outcome of renal allografts from older but not from younger donors

There is disagreement about the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on renal allograft outcome. This may depend on several variables including the age of the donor. We evaluated whether DGF could have different effects in recipients of kidneys from donors aged more than 60 years versus well-matched recipients of younger kidney donors. Patients were retrospectively subdivided into 3 groups. Immediate graft function (IGF), DGF without dialysis (DGF-ND), DGF requiring dialysis (DGF-D). DGF-ND and DGF-D occurred more frequently among 198 older than 198 younger donors (P = .016 and P = .044, respectively). The 5-year patient (96% vs 93%) and pure graft (96% vs 89%) survivals were significantly better in younger recipients, while the incidence of acute rejection was similar. After a mean follow-up of 66 +/- 44 months in older donor recipients, the graft survival was significantly better among IGF than patients in the DGF-ND (P = .046) or DGF-D (P = .003) groups. Instead, in younger recipients there was no difference in graft survival between IGD and DGF-ND. Only patients with DGF-D showed a significantly worse outcome. Upon multivariate analysis of older donors, their recipients, showed the pattern of graft function recovery to be the only variable associated with allograft outcome. Instead in younger donor recipients, acute rejection and time on dialysis were the main variables associated with a poor outcome. In older donor recipients, DGF was an independent variable associated with a poor graft outcome. In younger donor recipients, duration of dialysis and rejection were the most important predictors of poor graft outcomes.     

Parental donors in live-donor kidney transplantation associated with increased rejection rates and reduced glomerular filtration rates

BACKGROUND: Living unrelated and related kidney transplantation has been shown to have similar allograft survival. However, the effect of donor-recipient relatedness in living-related and unrelated kidney transplantation on graft and patient survival remains uncertain. METHODS: Using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, primary living renal transplant recipients in Australia between 1995 and 2004 were studied (n=1989). Donors were categorized according to their relationship with recipients: parent (n=606), child (n=103), spouse (n=358), sibling (n=656), other living-related donors (n=81), and other living-unrelated donors (n=185). Outcomes analyzed included the presence of rejection at 6 months, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 and 3 years, graft survival, and patient survival. RESULTS: A greater proportion of renal transplant recipients from parental and spousal donors were transplanted preemptively. Donor groups had no relationship with graft or patient survival. Parental donors were associated with an increased relative odds of acute rejection (odds ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.53, P=0.009) and a lower eGFR at both 1 and 3 years (coefficient -2.99 and -5.68, respectively; P<0.0001) compared to other donor groups (reference sibling donor group). CONCLUSIONS: This study has established that donor-recipient relatedness in both related and unrelated living kidney transplantation had no significant effect on graft and patient survival. Parental donors were associated with a higher relative risk of rejection and lower eGFR in the transplant recipients, although these findings did not translate to a worse graft outcome.     

Donor and recipient pretransplant conditioning with nonlethal radiation and antilymphocyte serum improves the graft survival in a rat small bowel transplant model

BACKGROUND: Lymphoid tissue within the intestinal graft require immunomodulatory strategies to prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD) after transplant. Herein, we evaluate the potential advantage of donor-specific bone marrow infusions in donor and or recipient preconditioned with total body irradiation and or antilymphocyte serum (ALS) on the incidence of GVHD and rejection after small bowel transplantation. METHODS: Heterotopic SBTx was performed from DA to Lewis rats and distributed in nine groups: control group G0 (n=4) and G1 (n=6) without irradiation; recipients in G2 (n=4) were given 400 rd although in groups 3 (n=5), G4 (n=6), G6 (n=5), G7 (n=5), and G8 (n=6) with 250 rd. Donors in G5 (n=4) and G6 were given 250 rd of total body irradiation 2 hours before intestinal retrieval. Donors and recipients in G7 and donors in G8 additionally received ALS (day -5). G1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 8 were infused with UDBM and G4 with the same amount of TCDBM. Animals received tacrolimus for 15 days and accessed for rejection, GVHD and for chimerism analysis. RESULTS: High mortality due to GVHD was observed in G2, 3, and 4, and correlated with high levels of donor T cells in recipients blood. G0 and G1 showed early acute rejection with progression toward chronic rejection, in contrast to the preconditioned groups. High and low doses of total body irradiation resulted in allogeneic and in a mixed chimerism, respectively. Decrease in donor chimeric cells after 11 weeks in preconditioned groups was correlated with severe allograft rejection. CONCLUSION: Donor preconditioning with 250 rd and or ALS combined with recipient preconditioning and donor-specific bone marrow infusions prevented GVHD and resulted in a transient mixed chimerism with inhibition of allograft rejection after small bowel transplantation.     

Italian experience in adult clinical intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: 6 years later

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 2000 and November 2006, 28 isolated intestinal transplants and nine multivisceral transplants (five with liver) from cadaveric donors have been performed for short gut syndrome (n = 15), chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (n = 10), Gardner's syndrome (n = 9), radiation enteritis (n = 1), intestinal atresia (n = 1), and massive intestinal angiomatosis (n = 1). Indications for transplantations were: loss of venous access, recurrent sepsis due to central line infection, and/or major electrolyte and fluid imbalance. Liver dysfunction was present in 19 cases. All patients were adults of median age at transplant of 34.7 years and mean weight 59.6 kg. All recipients were on total parenteral nutrition for a mean time of 38.8 months. Mean donor/recipient body weight ratio was 1.1. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 892 +/- 699 days. Twenty-five patients were alive (67.5%) with 3-year patient survivals of 70% for isolated intestinal transplantations and 41% for the multivisceral transplantations (P = .01). The mortality rate was 32.5% with losses due to sepsis (63%) or rejection. Our 3-year graft survival rates were 70% for isolated intestinal transplantations and 41% for multivisceral transplantations (P = .02); graftectomy rate was 16%. These were 88% of grafts working properly with patients on regular diet with no need for parenteral nutrition. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Induction therapy has reduced the doses of postoperative immunosuppressive agents, especially in the first period, lowering the risk of renal failure and sepsis, mucosal surveillance protocol for early detection of rejection dramatically reduced the number of severe acute chronic rejections.     

Beneficial effect of concomitant induction with antilymphoblast globulin, cyclosporine, and steroids on long-term renal allograft outcome

BACKGROUND: The addition of induction therapy with antilymphocytic antibodies to cyclosporine (CsA) based immunosuppression, has reduced acute rejection incidence and improved short-term survivals, but has not had well-established effects on long-term renal transplant survival. PATIENTS: We analyzed the long-term allograft outcome of patients included in a prospective randomized clinical study conducted in our center 15 years ago by comparing two strategies: (A) horse antilymphoblast globulin (ALG) given at 10 mg/kg on alternate days to a maximum of 6 doses with low-dose CsA started at 8 mg/kg per day and prednisone at 0.25 mg/kg per day, versus (B) CsA started at 15 mg/kg per day and prednisone at 0.5 mg/kg per day. Diabetic and highly sensitized patients (PRA > 70%) were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The characteristics of the 50 patients enrolled in each group were not different. Although patient survival was not different (88% in group A vs 77% in group B), recipients treated with ALG showed a lower incidence of acute rejection episodes (20% vs 44%, P = .01) and better death-censored renal allograft survival (57% vs 41%, P = .03). Among rejection-free patients, graft survival was 15% higher in group A (60% vs 45%, P = .12). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an acute rejection episode (relative risk [RR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-4.39; P = .0029) rather than ALG immunosuppression (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.33; P = NS) was an independent predictor of death-censored graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we confirmed that concomitant induction therapy with ALG, CsA, and steroids improves long-term renal allograft survival.