X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners

A synergy of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanners is the use of the CT data for x-ray-based attenuation correction of the PET emission data. Current methods of measuring transmission use positron sources, gamma-ray sources, or x-ray sources. Each of the types of transmission scans involves different trade-offs of noise versus bias, with positron transmission scans having the highest noise but lowest bias, whereas x-ray scans have negligible noise but the potential for increased quantitative errors. The use of x-ray-based attenuation correction, however, has other advantages, including a lack of bias introduced from post-injection transmission scanning, which is an important practical consideration for clinical scanners, as well as reduced scan times. The sensitivity of x-ray-based attenuation correction to artifacts and quantitative errors depends on the method of translating the CT image from the effective x-ray energy of approximately 70 keV to attenuation coefficients at the PET energy of 511 keV. These translation methods are usually based on segmentation and/or scaling techniques. Errors in the PET emission image arise from positional mismatches caused by patient motion or respiration differences between the PET and CT scans; incorrect calculation of attenuation coefficients for CT contrast agents or metallic implants; or keeping the patient's arms in the field of view, which leads to truncation and/or beam-hardening (or x-ray scatter) artifacts. Proper interpretation of PET emission images corrected for attenuation by using the CT image relies on an understanding of the potential artifacts. In cases where an artifact or bias is suspected, careful inspection of all three available images (CT and PET emission with and without attenuation correction) is recommended.     

Does reducing CT artifacts from dental implants influence the PET interpretation in PET/CT studies of oral cancer and head and neck cancer?

In patients with oral head and neck cancer, the presence of metallic dental implants produces streak artifacts in the CT images. These artifacts negate the utility of CT for the spatial localization of PET findings and may propagate through the CT-based attenuation correction into the PET images. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of an algorithm that reduces metallic artifacts in CT images and the impact of this approach on the quantification of PET images. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with and 9 without dental implants underwent a PET/CT study. CT images through the patient's dental implants were reconstructed using both standard CT reconstruction and an algorithm that reduces metallic artifacts. Attenuation correction factors were calculated from both sets of CT images and applied to the PET data. The CT images were evaluated for any reduction of the artifacts. The PET images were assessed for any quantitative change introduced by metallic artifact reduction. RESULTS: For each reconstruction, 2 regions of interest were defined in areas where the standard CT reconstruction overestimated the Hounsfield units (HU), 2 were defined in underestimated areas, and 1 was defined in a region unaffected by the artifacts. The 5 regions of interest were transferred to the other 3 reconstructions. Mean HU or mean Bq/cm(3) were obtained for all regions. In the CT reconstructions, metallic artifact reduction decreased the overestimated HUs by approximately 60% and increased the underestimated HUs by approximately 90%. There was no change in quantification in the PET images between the 2 algorithms (Spearman coefficient of rank correlation, 0.99). Although the distribution of attenuation (HU) changed considerably in the CT images, the distribution of activity did not change in the PET images. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the algorithm can enhance the structural and spatial content of CT images in the presence of metallic artifacts. The CT artifacts do not propagate through the CT-based attenuation correction into the PET images, confirming the robustness of CT-based attenuation correction in the presence of metallic artifacts. The study also demonstrated that considerable changes in CT images do not change the PET images.     

Head and neck imaging with PET and PET/CT: artefacts from dental metallic implants

Germanium-68 based attenuation correction (PET(Ge68)) is performed in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for quantitative measurements. With the recent introduction of combined in-line PET/CT scanners, CT data can be used for attenuation correction. Since dental implants can cause artefacts in CT images, CT-based attenuation correction (PET(CT)) may induce artefacts in PET images. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of dental metallic artwork on the quality of PET images by comparing non-corrected images and images attenuation corrected by PET(Ge68) and PET(CT). Imaging was performed on a novel in-line PET/CT system using a 40-mAs scan for PET(CT) in 41 consecutive patients with high suspicion of malignant or inflammatory disease. In 17 patients, additional PET(Ge68) images were acquired in the same imaging session. Visual analysis of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) distribution in several regions of the head and neck was scored on a 4-point scale in comparison with normal grey matter of the brain in the corresponding PET images. In addition, artefacts adjacent to dental metallic artwork were evaluated. A significant difference in image quality scoring was found only for the lips and the tip of the nose, which appeared darker on non-corrected than on corrected PET images. In 33 patients, artefacts were seen on CT, and in 28 of these patients, artefacts were also seen on PET imaging. In eight patients without implants, artefacts were seen neither on CT nor on PET images. Direct comparison of PET(Ge68) and PET(CT) images showed a different appearance of artefacts in 3 of 17 patients. Malignant lesions were equally well visible using both transmission correction methods. Dental implants, non-removable bridgework etc. can cause artefacts in attenuation-corrected images using either a conventional 68Ge transmission source or the CT scan obtained with a combined PET/CT camera. We recommend that the non-attenuation-corrected PET images also be evaluated in patients undergoing PET of the head and neck.     

Application of oral contrast media in coregistered positron emission tomography-CT

OBJECTIVE: Coregistration of positron emission tomography (PET) and CT images results in significantly improved localization of abnormal FDG uptake compared with PET images alone. For delineation of intestinal structures, application of oral contrast media is a standard procedure in CT. The influence of oral contrast agents in PET imaging using CT data for attenuation correction was evaluated in a comparative study on an in-line PET-CT system. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients referred for PET-CT were evaluated in two groups. One group of 30 patients received oral Gastrografin 45 min before data acquisition. The second group received no contrast medium. PET images were reconstructed, using CT data for attenuation correction. Image analysis was performed by two reviewers in consensus, using a 4-point scale comparing FDG-uptake in the gastrointestinal tract in PET images of both groups. Furthermore, correlation of FDG uptake and localization of contrast media in the intestinal tract in CT images were determined. RESULTS: No significant difference in FDG uptake in PET images in all regions of the gastrointestinal tract except the ascending colon was seen in both groups. No correlation was found in the location of increased FDG uptake and contrast media in the CT images. CONCLUSION: An oral contrast agent can be used for coregistered PET-CT without the introduction of artifacts in PET.     

Do implanted pacemaker leads and ICD leads cause metal-related artifact in cardiac PET/CT?

Artifacts related to metallic implants are an established limitation of CT-based attenuation correction (CT-AC) in PET/CT. However, the impact of metallic components of pacemaker leads and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads on the accuracy of cardiac PET has not been evaluated. The goal of this study was to investigate the magnitude of artifacts related to pacing and defibrillation leads in both phantom and patient studies. METHODS: Images were acquired on a PET/CT scanner using CT-AC and were compared with those obtained on a dedicated PET scanner using transmission source-based attenuation correction. Phantoms consisting of pacemaker leads and ICD leads submerged in uniform background activity solution were imaged, and regions were analyzed to measure radionuclide concentrations at known lead locations relative to background. In addition, 15 cardiac 18F-FDG patients (having either pacing leads, defibrillation leads, or both) were imaged on both PET/CT and PET scanners. Images were visually and quantitatively assessed to determine whether artifact related to the implanted leads was present and, if so, its severity relative to surrounding myocardium. RESULTS: In phantom studies, artifacts caused by pacing lead electrodes were barely noticeable, but artifacts arising from highly radioopaque ICD shock coil electrodes were clearly apparent. In the patient studies, no artifacts from pacing leads were identified. However, significant artifact was observed in 50% of the patient studies with ICD leads. In the affected areas, local myocardial uptake in PET/CT images using CT-AC was, on average, 30% higher than that in the corresponding PET images. CONCLUSION: Although pacemaker leads do not appear to cause artifact in cardiac PET/CT images, ICD leads frequently do result in artifacts of sufficient magnitude to impact clinical image interpretation. Accordingly, software-based corrections in CT-AC algorithms appear necessary for accurate cardiac imaging with PET/CT.     

Applications of positron emission tomography/computed tomography image fusion in clinical positron emission tomography-clinical use,interpretation methods,diagnostic improvements

Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanners with combined dedicated high performance PET and CT scanners have been introduced recently in PET imaging. Oncological imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is currently the dominant application of PET. The addition of CT to PET offers many advantages, including obtaining a fast and relatively low-noise transmission scan, shortening the duration of the examination, adding precise anatomical information to FDG imaging, and providing additional diagnostic information. However, the use of CT for attenuation correction can lead to some artifacts that need to be considered when interpreting a PET/CT study: quantitative measurements may be altered, high density IV and oral and metallic objects may produce artifacts, and the registration of PET and CT may occasionally be suboptimal. Areas where using PET/CT offers particular potential advantages include the head and neck region, abdomen, and pelvis. Even in the thorax, PET/CT offers some advantages. Although clinical data evaluating the added value of PET/CT over PET are presently limited, preliminary results are very encouraging. More studies are warranted to clearly define the clinical impact of PET/CT over PET; however, it is clear this dedicated fusion technology will be very important for patient imaging in the coming years.     

Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts.

We investigated the effect of CT truncation in whole-body (WB) PET/CT imaging of large patients, and we evaluated the efficacy of an extended field-of-view (eFOV) correction technique. METHODS: Two uniform phantoms simulating a "torso" and an "arms-up" setup were filled with (18)F-FDG/water. A third, nonuniform "body phantom was prepared with hot and cold lesions. All 3 phantoms were positioned in the center of the PET/CT gantry with >or=10% of their volume extending beyond the maximum CT FOV. An eFOV algorithm was used to estimate complete CT projections from nonlinear extrapolation of the truncated projections. CT-based attenuation correction (CT AC) of the phantom data was performed using CT images reconstructed from truncated and extended projections. For clinical validation, we processed truncated datasets from 10 PET/CT patients with and without eFOV correction. RESULTS: When using truncated CT images for CT AC, PET tracer distribution was suppressed outside the transverse CT FOV in phantom and patient studies. PET activity concentration in the truncated regions was only 10%-32% of the true value but increased to 84%-100% when using the extended CT images for CT AC. At the same time, the contour of phantoms and patients was recovered to the anatomically correct shape from the uncorrected emission images, and the apparent distortion of lesions near the maximum CT FOV was reduced. CONCLUSION: Truncation artifacts in WB PET/CT led to visual and quantitative distortions of the CT and attenuation-corrected PET images in the area of truncation. These artifacts can be corrected to improve the accuracy of PET/CT for diagnosis and therapy response evaluation.     

18F-FDG PET/CT的特点及其在肿瘤诊断中的应用

最近几年,具有高性能PET和CT的同机PET/CT已投入临床,其在肿瘤学中的应用呈迅速增长之势.加入高档CT的PET较之传统的PET在技术和临床方面具有明显优势.CT扫描一方面为PET提供了快速、准确的衰减校正数据,大大缩短采集时间,另一方面为PET图像提供了精确的解剖定位,使结果更加肯定,但引入CT的PET扫描也带来了一些技术上的新问题.PET/CT在头颈、腹盆肿瘤具有明显优势,即使在生理运动影响较大的胸部也取得了满意的效果.初步临床研究表明,PET/CT较之单独CT或PET在临床肿瘤学中具有明显优势,PET/CT融合显像对肿瘤患者和临床医生具有越来越重要的价值.     

Effective methods to correct contrast agent-induced errors in PET quantification in cardiac PET/CT.

In combined PET/CT studies, x-ray attenuation information from the CT scan is generally used for PET attenuation correction. Iodine-containing contrast agents may induce artifacts in the CT-generated attenuation map and lead to an erroneous radioactivity distribution on the corrected PET images. This study evaluated 2 methods of thresholding the CT data to correct these contrast agent-related artifacts. METHODS: PET emission and attenuation data (acquired with and without a contrast agent) were simulated using a cardiac torso software phantom and were obtained from patients. Seven patients with known coronary artery disease underwent 2 electrocardiography-gated CT scans of the heart, the first without a contrast agent and the second with intravenous injection of an iodine-containing contrast agent. A 20-min PET scan (single bed position) covering the same axial range as the CT scans was then obtained 1 h after intravenous injection of (18)F-FDG. For both the simulated data and the patient data, the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced attenuation datasets were used for attenuation correction of the PET data. Additionally, 2 threshold methods (one requiring user interaction) aimed at compensating for the effect of the contrast agent were applied to the contrast-enhanced attenuation data before PET attenuation correction. All PET images were compared by quantitative analysis. RESULTS: Regional radioactivity values in the heart were overestimated when the contrast-enhanced data were used for attenuation correction. For patients, the mean decrease in the left ventricular wall was 23%. Use of either of the proposed compensation methods reduced the quantification error to less than 5%. The required time for postprocessing was minimal for the user-independent method. CONCLUSION: The use of contrast-enhanced CT images for attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT significantly impairs PET quantification of tracer uptake. The proposed CT correction methods markedly reduced these artifacts; additionally, the user-independent method was time-efficient.     

Correction of oral contrast artifacts in CT-based attenuation correction of PET images using an automated segmentation algorithm

Purpose  Oral contrast is usually administered in most X-ray computed tomography (CT) examinations of the abdomen and the pelvis as it allows more accurate identification of the bowel and facilitates the interpretation of abdominal and pelvic CT studies. However, the misclassification of contrast medium with high-density bone in CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) is known to generate artifacts in the attenuation map (μmap), thus resulting in overcorrection for attenuation of positron emission tomography (PET) images. In this study, we developed an automated algorithm for segmentation and classification of regions containing oral contrast medium to correct for artifacts in CT-attenuation-corrected PET images using the segmented contrast correction (SCC) algorithm. Methods  The proposed algorithm consists of two steps: first, high CT number object segmentation using combined region- and boundary-based segmentation and second, object classification to bone and contrast agent using a knowledge-based nonlinear fuzzy classifier. Thereafter, the CT numbers of pixels belonging to the region classified as contrast medium are substituted with their equivalent effective bone CT numbers using the SCC algorithm. The generated CT images are then down-sampled followed by Gaussian smoothing to match the resolution of PET images. A piecewise calibration curve was then used to convert CT pixel values to linear attenuation coefficients at 511 keV. Results  The visual assessment of segmented regions performed by an experienced radiologist confirmed the accuracy of the segmentation and classification algorithms for delineation of contrast-enhanced regions in clinical CT images. The quantitative analysis of generated μmaps of 21 clinical CT colonoscopy datasets showed an overestimation ranging between 24.4% and 37.3% in the 3D-classified regions depending on their volume and the concentration of contrast medium. Two PET/CT studies known to be problematic demonstrated the applicability of the technique in clinical setting. More importantly, correction of oral contrast artifacts improved the readability and interpretation of the PET scan and showed substantial decrease of the SUV (104.3%) after correction. Conclusions  An automated segmentation algorithm for classification of irregular shapes of regions containing contrast medium was developed for wider applicability of the SCC algorithm for correction of oral contrast artifacts during the CTAC procedure. The algorithm is being refined and further validated in clinical setting.     

Reduction of artefacts caused by hip implants in CT-based attenuation-corrected PET images using 2-D interpolation of a virtual sinogram on an irregular grid

Purpose  

Metallic prosthetic replacements, such as hip or knee implants, are known to cause strong streaking artefacts in CT images. These artefacts likely induce over- or underestimation of the activity concentration near the metallic implants when applying CT-based attenuation correction of positron emission tomography (PET) images. Since this degrades the diagnostic quality of the images, metal artefact reduction (MAR) prior to attenuation correction is required.     

CT-based attenuation correction in the calculation of semi-quantitative indices of [<Superscript>18</Superscript>F]FDG uptake in PET

The introduction of combined PET/CT systems has a number of advantages, including the utilisation of CT images for PET attenuation correction (AC). The potential advantage compared with existing methodology is less noisy transmission maps within shorter times of acquisition. The objective of our investigation was to assess the accuracy of CT attenuation correction (CTAC) and to study resulting bias and signal to noise ratio (SNR) in image-derived semi-quantitative uptake indices. A combined PET/CT system (GE Discovery LS) was used. Different size phantoms containing variable density components were used to assess the inherent accuracy of a bilinear transformation in the conversion of CT images to 511 keV attenuation maps. This was followed by a phantom study simulating tumour imaging conditions, with a tumour to background ratio of 5:1. An additional variable was the inclusion of contrast agent at different concentration levels. A CT scan was carried out followed by 5 min emission with 1-h and 3-min transmission frames. Clinical data were acquired in 50 patients, who had a CT scan under normal breathing conditions (CTAC(nb)) or under breath-hold with inspiration (CTAC(insp)) or expiration (CTAC(exp)), followed by a PET scan of 5 and 3 min per bed position for the emission and transmission scans respectively. Phantom and patient studies were reconstructed using segmented AC (SAC) and CTAC. In addition, measured AC (MAC) was performed for the phantom study using the 1-h transmission frame. Comparing the attenuation coefficients obtained using the CT- and the rod source-based attenuation maps, differences of 3% and <6% were recorded before and after segmentation of the measured transmission maps. Differences of up to 6% and 8% were found in the average count density (SUV(avg)) between the phantom images reconstructed with MAC and those reconstructed with CTAC and SAC respectively. In the case of CTAC, the difference increased up to 27% with the presence of contrast agent. The presence of metallic implants led to underestimation in the surrounding SUV(avg) and increasing non-uniformity in the proximity of the implant. The patient study revealed no statistically significant differences in the SUV(avg) between either CTAC(nb) or CTAC(exp) and SAC-reconstructed images. The larger differences were recorded in the lung. Both the phantom and the patient studies revealed an average increase of approximately 25% in the SNR for the CTAC-reconstructed emission images compared with the SAC-reconstructed images. In conclusion, CTAC(nb) or CTAC(exp) is a viable alternative to SAC for whole-body studies. With CTAC, careful consideration should be given to interpretation of images and use of SUVs in the presence of oral contrast and in the proximity of metallic implants.     

Correction for oral contrast artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected PET images obtained by combined PET/CT.

Recent studies have shown increased artifacts in CT attenuation-corrected (CTAC) PET images acquired with oral contrast agents because of misclassification of contrast as bone. We have developed an algorithm, segmented contrast correction (SCC), to properly transform CT numbers in the contrast regions from CT energies (40-140 keV) to PET energy at 511 keV. METHODS: A bilinear transformation, equivalent to that supplied by the PET/CT scanner manufacturer, for the conversion of linear attenuation coefficients of normal tissues from CT to PET energies was optimized for BaSO(4) contrast agent. This transformation was validated by comparison with the linear attenuation coefficients measured for BaSO(4) at concentrations ranging from 0% to 80% at 511 keV for PET transmission images acquired with (68)Ge rod sources. In the CT images, the contrast regions were contoured to exclude bony structures and then segmented on the basis of a minimum threshold CT number (300 Hounsfield units). The CT number in each pixel identified with contrast was transformed into the corresponding effective bone CT number to produce the correct attenuation coefficient when the data were translated by the manufacturer software into PET energy during the process of CT attenuation correction. CT images were then used for attenuation correction of PET emission data. The algorithm was validated with a phantom in which a lesion was simulated within a volume of BaSO(4) contrast and in the presence of a human vertebral bony structure. Regions of interest in the lesion, bone, and contrast on emission PET images reconstructed with and without the SCC algorithm were analyzed. The results were compared with those for images obtained with (68)Ge-based transmission attenuation-corrected PET. RESULTS: The SCC algorithm was able to correct for contrast artifacts in CTAC PET images. In the phantom studies, the use of SCC resulted in an approximate 32% reduction in the apparent activity concentration in the lesion compared with data obtained from PET images without SCC and a <7.6% reduction compared with data obtained from (68)Ge-based attenuation-corrected PET images. In one clinical study, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) measurements for the lesion, bladder, and bowel were, respectively, 14.52, 13.63, and 13.34 g/mL in CTAC PET images, 59.45, 26.71, and 37.22 g/mL in (68)Ge-based attenuation-corrected PET images, and 11.05, 6.66, and 6.33 g/mL in CTAC PET images with SCC. CONCLUSION: Correction of oral contrast artifacts in PET images obtained by combined PET/CT yielded more accurate quantitation of the lesion and other, normal structures. The algorithm was tested in a clinical case, in which SUV(max) measurements showed discrepancies of 2%, 1.3%, and 5% between (68)Ge-based attenuation-corrected PET images and CTAC PET images with SCC for the lesion, bladder, and bowel, respectively. These values correspond to 6.5%, 62%, and 66% differences between CTAC-based measurements and (68)Ge-based ones.     

PET/CT in musculoskeletal infection

Early diagnosis of musculoskeletal infections is the key to successful therapy and prevention of complications. Fluorine-18 (F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is a promising modality for imaging musculoskeletal infection and might play an important role in the evaluation of chronic osteomyelitis and spinal infection. FDG-PET has shown promising results for diagnosing both acute and chronic infection of the axial and appendicular skeletons. PET imaging will have increased importance in patients with metallic implants because FDG uptake, in contrast to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), is not hampered by metallic artifacts. In patients with suspected prosthetic joint infection, results of PET are controversial, and combined indium-111-labeled leukocyte and technetium-99m-sulfur colloid marrow scintigraphy still remains the gold standard. PET/CT with the combination of PET and a low-dose or full-dose diagnostic CT provides exact anatomical correlation of bone and joint lesions and increases the accuracy of the test compared with PET alone. The question of in which situations PET/CT becomes the preferred imaging method in suspected musculoskeletal infection depends on several factors, including cost and availability. This article reviews the currently available literature and addresses the use of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal infections.     

Whole-body PET/CT: spectrum of physiological variants, artifacts and interpretative pitfalls in cancer patients

Accurate diagnosis and staging in oncology is essential in the evaluation of cancer for optimal patient outcome. Conventional imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT), rely basically on morphological changes for tumour detection. Clinical experience, however, shows that morphological criteria may be misleading and may not always allow differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Positron emission tomography (PET) with [F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is rapidly gaining a critical role in the clinical evaluation of patients with cancer. However, PET lacks anatomical landmarks for topographic orientation, and identification of abnormal glucose metabolic activity in regions close to organs with variable physiological FDG uptake can be difficult. To overcome these difficulties, a combined PET/CT scanner that acquires both functional (PET) and CT images has been recently developed. Proper interpretation of PET (and PET/CT) images requires a thorough understanding of the normal physiological distribution of FDG in the body, along with a knowledge of frequently encountered physiological variations in FDG distribution, and recognition of non-malignant causes of FDG uptake that can be confused with a malignant neoplasm. In addition, because of the utilization of the CT transmission information for the correction of the attenuation of the PET emission data (and for the reconstruction of the PET images), some artifacts may be generated. As a consequence, CT based attenuation correction of PET images may result in erroneous PET/CT interpretations. The aim of this extensively illustrated paper is to demonstrate several potential pitfalls encountered during the interpretation of PET/CT images so that radiologists can avoid false positive diagnoses and recognize inherently non-specific findings on PET/CT images obtained for oncological diagnosis.     

PET/CT artifacts

There are several artifacts encountered in positron emission tomography/computed tomographic (PET/CT) imaging, including attenuation correction (AC) artifacts associated with using CT for AC. Several artifacts can mimic a 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) avid malignant lesions and therefore recognition of these artifacts is clinically relevant. Our goal was to identify and characterize these artifacts and also discuss some protocol variables that may affect image quality in PET/CT.     

PET/CT——功能与解剖结构的同机图像融合

PET/CT为近几年出现的一种新技术,将PET与CT安装在同一机架上,一次扫描可获得PET与CT的融合图像,对定位诊断肿瘤、指导肿瘤放疗计划、选择活检部位及监测疗效等具有重要价值,同时,CT提供了一种PET衰减校正的方法。本文简要介绍PET/CT的结构设计与性能、优势及目前尚存在的技术问题。     

Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid metal artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device

BACKGROUND: Attenuation correction is generally used to PET images to achieve count rate values independent from tissue densities. The goal of this study was to provide a qualitative comparison of attenuation corrected PET images produced by a PET-CT device (CT, 120 kV, 40 mAs, FOV 600 mm) with and without segmentation of transmission data (ACseg+ and ACseg-respectively). Methods: The reconstructed images were compared to attenuation corrected images obtained with a high-energy transmission source (Cs-137 - 662 keV).Thirty oncologic patients were studied using CT and 137Cs for attenuation correction. All image data were acquired using the Gemini PET-CT scanner (Philips Medical Systems). It is an open PET-CT system that consists of the MX8000 multislice CT and the Allegro PET scanner arranged in a separable configuration. Images with ACseg+ and ACseg- were analyzed simultaneously in coronal, sagittal and transaxial planes. Two nuclear medicine physicians reviewed the image sets. Results: The image quality in the area of metal implants was better with ACseg+ than ACseg-, without metal induced artifacts generally observed in CT corrected images. Further the images with ACseg+ were qualitatively comparable to those obtained with 137Cs attenuation correction. Conclusions: In case of metal implants, PET studies corrected by CT should preferably use the ACseg+ method to avoid the image artifacts.     

Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Standard application of CT intravenous contrast agents in combined PET/CT may lead to high-density artifacts on CT and attenuation-corrected PET. To avoid associated diagnostic pitfalls, we designed and compared different intravenous contrast injection protocols for routine whole-body PET/CT. METHODS: Whole-body PET/CT included a topogram and a single spiral CT scan (2-row) with or without intravenous contrast, followed by an emission scan. The CT scan was used for attenuation correction of the emission data. Four groups of 10 whole-body PET/CT referrals each were investigated: (A) no intravenous contrast agent, (B) biphasic injection (90 and 50 mL at 3 and 1.5 mL/s, respectively) of intravenous contrast (300 mg/mL iodine) and CT in the craniocaudal direction with a 30-s delay, (C) triple-phase injection (90, 40, and 40 mL at 3, 2, and 1.5 mL/s, respectively) in the craniocaudal direction with a 50-s delay, and (D) dual-phase injection (80 and 60 mL at 3 and 1.5 mL/s, respectively) in the caudocranial direction with a 50-s delay. CT image quality was assessed on a scale from 1 to 3, and CT and attenuation-corrected PET images were reviewed separately for contrast-induced artifacts. RESULTS: Average CT image quality was poorest for protocol A (1.0) but improved to 2.8 when using intravenous contrast agents (protocols B-D). Only protocols B and C resulted in contrast-induced image artifacts that were limited to the thorax. The most homogeneous intravenous contrast enhancement without high-density image artifacts on either CT or PET after CT-based attenuation correction was achieved with protocol D. CONCLUSION: Dual-phase intravenous contrast injection and CT in the caudocranial direction with a 50-s delay yields reproducible high image quality and is now used routinely for combined diagnostic PET/CT at our hospital.     

PET/CT today: System and its impact on cancer diagnosis

Over the past six years, PET/CT has spread rapidly and replaced conventional PET. Although PET/CT is a combination of PET for functional information and CT for morphological information, their combination is synergistic. PET/CT fusion images result in higher diagnostic accuracy with fewer equivocal findings. This results in a greater impact on cancer diagnosis. With attenuation correction performed by the CT component, PET/CT can provide higher quality images over shorter examination times than conventional PET. As with all modalities, PET/CT has several characteristic artifacts such as misregistration due to respiration, overattenuation correction due to metals, etc. Awareness of these pitfalls will help the imaging physician use PET/CT effectively in daily practice.