Facial pustules due to drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms may histopathologically mimic eosinophilic pustular folliculitis: A case report

Pustules with facial and/or neck edema is one characteristic feature of drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DIHS/DRESS) at the early stage. Although several retrospective histopathologic studies on DIHS/DRESS have been reported, the detailed histopathologic findings of facial pustules for DIHS/DRESS are unavailable. We herein report a case of DIHS/DRESS with facial pustules that was histopathologically similar to eosinophilic pustular folliculitis (EPF). Eosinophilic infiltration into expanded follicles and sebaceous glands, which is highly characteristic of EPF, was detected in pustules due to DIHS/DRESS in this case. There are numerous pathophysiological similarities between DIHS/DRESS and EPF, which may cause their histopathologic similarity. Our findings suggest that facial pustules of DIHS/DRESS may histopathologically mimic EPF.     

Drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms due to lamotrigine differs from that due to other drugs

Drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), also referred to as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a multi‐organ systemic drug reaction characterized by hematological abnormalities and reactivation of human herpesvirus‐6 (HHV‐6). DIHS/DRESS is typically associated with a limited number of drugs, such as the anticonvulsants. Our group has treated 12 patients for DIHS/DRESS due to lamotrigine (LTG), but their presentation differed from that of patients with DIHS/DRESS caused by other drugs. The aim of the present study was to identify significant differences between DIHS/DRESS caused by LTG versus other drugs. We retrospectively reviewed data of 12 patients with DIHS/DRESS caused by LTG and 32 patients with DIHS/DRESS due to other drugs. The increase in alanine aminotransferase level was significantly milder in the LTG group than the DIHS/DRESS group due to other drugs. The percentage of atypical lymphocytes in the blood during DIHS/DRESS was lower in the LTG group. Serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase and thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine were also lower in the LTG group. There were fewer DIHS/DRESS patients with HHV‐6 reactivation in the LTG group than in the group treated with other drugs. Lymphocyte transformation after DIHS/DRESS onset was faster in the LTG group. The two groups did not differ with respect to the interval from first drug intake to rash, white blood cell count, blood eosinophilia or DRESS score. There were no significant histopathological differences between the two groups. The features of LTG‐associated DIHS/DRESS and DIHS/DRESS due to other drugs differ.     

Late-onset interstitial nephritis in a patient with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), also referred to as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe hypersensitivity drug reaction affecting the skin and multiple internal organ systems. We report a 47-year-old man with DIHS/DRESS and comorbidities (fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus, valsartan-induced photosensitivity, vitiligo and acute interstitial nephritis). Although acute interstitial nephritis usually appears in the early phase, his is a rare case of acute interstitial nephritis more than 2 years after the onset of DIHS/DRESS.     

Drug‐reaction eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), is a rare, severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterised by fever, rash, lymphadenopathy, eosinophilia and/or other leukocyte abnormalities, and internal organ involvement and often has a relapsing–remitting course despite withdrawal of the drug. The drugs that are most implicated include aromatic anticonvulsants, allopurinol, sulphonamides, antiretrovirals (abacavir and nevirapine), and minocycline. The pathogenesis of DRESS/DIHS is far from clear but probably involves a combination of impaired pharmacokinetics and the accumulation of drug metabolites, the sequential reactivation of the herpesvirus family and genetic susceptibility conferred by the association with certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I alleles. The strong association between abacavir and HLA‐B*5701 has enabled pharmacogenetics screening to be employed successfully to minimise the occurrence of hypersensitivity. A prolonged course of oral corticosteroids is required to treat DRESS/DIHS, given the relapsing–remitting nature of the condition with i.v. immunoglobulin and valgangciclovir reserved for refractory or life‐threatening cases.     

Patch testing is an effective method for the diagnosis of carbamazepine‐induced drug reaction,eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome in an 8‐year‐old girl

Drug reaction, eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is an acute and life‐threatening disease, characterised by fever, rash and systemic symptoms, including lymphadenopathy, abnormal liver function, interstitial nephritis, pulmonary and cardiac infiltrates and haematological abnormalities with eosinophilia and atypical lymphocytes. The drugs mostly associated with DRESS are anticonvulsants, allopurinol, minocycline and sulfonamides. This syndrome is rarely seen in childhood even though a large number of children have anticonvulsant treatment. An 8‐year‐old girl was admitted with fever, lymphadenopathy and skin eruptions on her trunk. Her medical history was notable for epilepsy and carbamazepine treatment had been started 5 weeks previously. Laboratory studies showed a white cell count of 6200/µL (normal, 4100–11 200/µL) with 22% eosinophils and a γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase level of 296 U/L (normal, 0–23 U/L). Laboratory tests for infections and collagen diseases were in the normal range. Persistence of fever and maculopapular eruption with generalised desquamation and the appearance of cheilitis and facial angioedema suggested a hypersensitivity reaction to carbamazepine. The carbamazepine was replaced with levetiracetam. All clinical symptoms improved within a week with corticosteroids and antihistamine treatment. Six weeks after complete recovery an epicutaneous patch test with carbamazepine was performed and a carbamazepine‐induced positive skin reaction was observed at 48‐h. Carbamazepine‐induced DRESS syndrome is a rare entity in children. An epicutaneous patch test is a useful tool for identifying the inducing agent for the DRESS syndrome and for identifying a safe anticonvulsant drug.     

Long-term outcome of patients with severe cutaneous adverse reactions

Visceral involvement associated with Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) and drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DIHS/DRESS) is well documented. However, little is known about the long-term outcomes of severe drug eruptions due to a lack of long-term follow-up. Long-term sequelae may arise in patients who survive the acute complications of severe drug reactions. In SJS/TEN, extensive scarring that result from the healing of mucocutaneous ulcerative lesions may interfere with organ function. Severe sequelae include visual impairment and pulmonary obliterative disease that impair patients' quality of life. In DIHS/DRESS, recent observations suggest that fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus (FT1D) and autoimmune diseases such as autoimmune thyroiditis and lupus erythematosus can occur after a disease-free period of several months to years. Thus, DIHS/DRESS may lead to the development of autoimmune diseases, which may be overlooked. Dermatologists need to be aware of the sequelae that may arise following resolution of severe cutaneous adverse reactions and should be vigilant for manifestations of autoimmune disease during follow-up.     

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: A drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome with variable clinical features

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) or drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) involves a unique and severe adverse drug reaction. Patients present with fever, rash, lymphadenopathy, hematological abnormalities, systemic illness, and may suffer from prolonged courses. Although the precise pathogenesis of DRESS/DIHS is not fully understood, it is widely considered to be an immunological reaction to a drug or drug metabolites. In this review article, we discuss the historical aspects of nosology, variable clinical and histopathological features, advantages and disadvantages of using an international Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) and Japanese DIHS criteria, pathogenesis, treatment, and long-term sequelae of DRESS/DIHS. Early recognition of this syndrome, withdrawal of suspected culprit drugs, and adequate supportive care are mainstays of improving patient prognosis and reducing morbidities and mortality. Moreover, some DRESS/DIHS patients may develop long-term sequelae, especially autoimmune diseases and end organ failure. Physicians should be aware of these possibilities in patients after DRESS/DIHS and cautiously follow-up symptoms and laboratory tests for early detection of these sequelae.     

Case Report of Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Demonstrating Human Herpesvirus‐6 Reactivation

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome that presents with diffuse cutaneous eruptions, fever, and multiorgan involvement. Here we present a pediatric case of DRESS complicated by human herpesvirus (HHV)‐6 reactivation. After 1 week of sulfasalazine, our patient developed a diffuse morbilliform eruption. Sulfasalazine was discontinued. The patient presented to the emergency department soon thereafter with worsening eruption, fever, rigors, facial edema, and lymphadenopathy. Methylprednisolone was initiated. Peripheral smear did not demonstrate eosinophilia but showed toxic granulation with atypical lymphocytes. Transaminase levels and white blood cell count quickly became elevated, with increased eosinophils, suggesting DRESS. During the methylprednisolone taper, our patient experienced symptom exacerbation, acute hepatitis, and HHV‐6 seroconversion, indicating HHV‐6 reactivation as the cause. As demonstrated by our patient, a decelerated methylprednisone taper is important because of potential symptom flaring during taper. Additionally, in the care of individuals with DRESS, HHV‐6 is often tested for upon admission and not repeated. Delay in the rise of titers necessitates repeat testing.     

Koebnerization of Hailey–Hailey disease into a cutaneous drug eruption of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis associated with systemic symptoms

We describe a 65‐year‐old Caucasian female with well‐controlled Hailey–Hailey disease (HHD) who developed acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) with severe systemic symptoms. Despite sparing of the patient's intertriginous skin, histopathologic evidence of HHD was observed in all biopsies, suggestive of a unique koebernization phenomenon of HHD to areas of cutaneous drug eruption. While internal organ involvement is less commonly reported in AGEP, there are an increasing number of patients with signs and symptoms suggestive of an AGEP/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) spectrum of cutaneous drug disorders. Early diagnosis of patients with AGEP and systemic symptoms is critical so that these patients may receive prompt and aggressive systemic therapy to decrease the risk of end organ damage and improve overall morbidity and mortality.     

Identification of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17) as a potential marker for early indication of disease and prediction of disease activity in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)

BackgroundDrug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a serious acute drug reaction with fever, cutaneous eruption, lymphadenopathy, and several visceral dysfunctions. Eosinophilia is a common hematological abnormality in DIHS/DRESS suggesting that the Th2-type immune response is involved. Thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17) is a family of CC chemokines known to play an important role in Th2-mediated immune-inflammatory processes.ObjectiveWe investigated the pathogenic role of TARC in patients with DIHS.MethodsSera were obtained from 8 patients with DIHS, 7 patients with Stevens–Johnson syndrome/Toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN), and 14 patients with drug-induced maculopapular exanthema (MPE). Serum TARC levels were measured by ELISA. TARC levels were then compared with clinical symptoms and various hematological parameters. In addition, a biopsy was taken from the lesional skin of patients with DIHS and stained with anti-TARC Ab and anti-CD11c Ab.ResultsSerum TARC levels in patients with DIHS were significantly higher than those in patients with SJS/TEN and MPE during the acute phase. Serum TARC levels in DIHS patients correlated with skin eruptions, serum sIL-2R levels, eosinophil counts, and serum IL-5 levels. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that TARC was mainly expressed on CD11c+ dermal dendritic cells in patients with DIHS.ConclusionSerum TARC levels may be associated with the initial presentation of DIHS as well as disease activity during the course. Thus, they could be useful as an indicator for early diagnosis and assessment of disease activity in DIHS. CD11c+ dendritic cells may be the main source of TARC in patients with DIHS.     

Clinical course of drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome treated without systemic corticosteroids

Background /aim Drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) is a severe reaction to drugs which characteristically occurs after a long latency period. In addition, human herpes virus 6 (HHV‐6) reactivation is a characteristic finding in DIHS, which has been known to be related to disease severity. Because DIHS has generally been treated by systemic corticosteroids, the natural clinical course is not clear. Methods Data for patients with both DIHS and HHV‐6 reactivation were retrospectively collected from four hospitals. Results Data were collected on 12 patients ranging in age from 21 to 76 years (median, 65.5). All cases had been suspected of DIHS at their initial visit, and the elevation of serum anti‐HHV‐6 antibody had been confirmed (4–256 times: median; 32). The culprit drugs were carbamazepine (6), salazosulfapyridine (4), mexiletine (1) and zonisamide (1). The period of latency from the first administration of the drug ranged from 15 to 50 days (median, 30). All patients were treated conservatively for DIHS without systemic corticosteroids. The peaks of the patients’ symptoms and laboratory findings were as follows (days from the onset of skin lesions): fever, 4–16 (median, 10.5); liver abnormality, 3–22 (median, 7.5); leukocytosis, 7–20 (median, 9). All patients recovered without pneumonia, myocarditis, nephritis or other systemic disease, from 7 to 37 days (median, 18) after withdrawal of the drug and from 11 to 44 days (median, 21) after the onset of skin lesions. Conclusion It might be unnecessary to give systemic corticosteroids immediately to all patients suspected of having DIHS.     

Influence of corticosteroid therapy on viral reactivation in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe adverse drug reaction characteristically associated with sequential reactivation of herpesviruses, such as human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV). Since systemic corticosteroids are thought to result in viral reactivation due to their immunosuppressive effects, we clarified the influence of systemic corticosteroid therapy on viral reactivation in DIHS/DRESS. Viral DNA in peripheral whole blood and serum sIL-2R level were measured during the disease course in twenty DIHS/DRESS patients. Six of seven patients treated without corticosteroids experienced HHV-6 viremia associated with elevated serum sIL-2R levels. In contrast, high-dose corticosteroids started within 1 week after onset tended to inhibit the occurrence of HHV-6 reactivation with remarkable suppression of serum sIL-2R level. Low-dose corticosteroids or late-start high-dose corticosteroids did not suppress occurrence of HHV-6 viremia and the increase of sIL-2R levels. HHV-6 load in the blood was clearly correlated with the serum sIL-2R level. On the other hand, increased CMV load were found in patients treated with corticosteroids regardless of the start time. The frequency of detection of EBV DNA in peripheral blood was similarly observed in all groups. In conclusion, high-dose corticosteroids started within 1 week tended to suppress HHV-6 reactivation through suppression of T cell activation. However, CMV proliferation was promoted by corticosteroids regardless of the start time. These observations suggested that careful consideration should be given to the dose and timing of administration of systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of DIHS/DRESS.     

Presence of the HLA‐A*3101 allele in a familial case of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms,secondary to carbamazepine

Anticonvulsants such as carbamazepine and phenytoin are associated with adverse skin reactions ranging from maculopapular exanthems to more severe reactions, including drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. In addition to their antiepileptic role, anticonvulsants are also used to treat pain syndromes including trigeminal neuralgia. Until recently, the associated skin reactions were thought to be unpredictable; however, the current literature suggests a genetic predisposition involving the human leucocyte antigen (HLA) in cutaneous reactions associated with carbamazepine usage. We present two familial cases of DRESS secondary to carbamazepine, in which an underlying genetic predisposition and allelic association were identified.     

Carbamazepine-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: report of four cases and brief review

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a rare but severe drug reaction, most commonly to aromatic anticonvulsants with a delayed onset, variable clinical presentation and protracted course. The exact incidence of DRESS syndrome is not known because of the variability in clinical presentation, lack of strict diagnostic criteria and universally accepted nomenclature.
We report four cases of DRESS syndrome associated with the use of carbamazepine. The clinical manifestation was similar: a maculopapular eruption progressing to exfoliative erythroderma, fever, and lymphadenopathy. Leukocytosis, atypical lymphocytes and liver injury (in 2 patients) were also observed. Assessment of causality using the Naranjo algorithm established a "probable" relationship with carbamazepine in three of the cases and a "possible" relationship in one case.
Detection of DRESS syndrome is dependent on the exclusion of a variety of diseases with similar manifestations and may be delayed in time. DRESS syndrome is a potentially life-threatening multisystem adverse drug reaction, and accidental reexposure or drug provocation tests must be avoided.     

Piperacillin/Tazobactam-Associated Hypersensitivity Syndrome with Overlapping Features of Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis and Drug-Related Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms Syndrome

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare disorder characterized by acute onset of erythematous and edematous eruptions with sterile pustules, accompanied by fever, and a self-limiting condition thought to be caused by drugs, in particular, antibiotics. Drug-related rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a severe adverse drug-induced reaction, characterized by a generalized skin rash associated with hypereosinophilia, lymphocytosis, and internal organ involvement. These reactions differ in causative agents, as well as clinical presentation, prognosis, and treatment. Therefore, appropriate diagnostic measures should be rapidly undertaken. Herein, we described a patient who developed overlapping features of hypersensitivity syndromes, AGEP and DRESS, with the use of piperacillin and the beta-lactamase inhibitor sodium tazobactam. Coexistence of AGEP and DRESS in the same patient is quite rare. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no previous reports on the coexistence of AGEP and DRESS associated with piperacillin/tazobactam.     

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions seen in a tertiary hospital in Johor,Malaysia

Background Adverse drug reactions are most commonly cutaneous in nature. Patterns of cutaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and their causative drugs vary among the different populations previously studied. Objective Our aim is to determine the clinical pattern of drug eruptions and the common drugs implicated, particularly in severe cutaneous ADRs in our population. Materials and Methods This study was done by analyzing the database established for all adverse cutaneous drug reactions seen from January 2001 until December 2008. Results A total of 281 cutaneous ADRs were seen in 280 patients. The most common reaction pattern was maculopapular eruption (111 cases, 39.5%) followed by Stevens‐Johnson Syndrome (SJS: 79 cases, 28.1%), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS: 19 cases, 6.8%), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN: 16 cases, 5.7 %), urticaria/angioedema (15 cases, 5.3%) and fixed drug eruptions (15 cases, 5.3%). Antibiotics (38.8%) and anticonvulsants (23.8%) accounted for 62.6% of the 281 cutaneous ADRs seen. Allopurinol was implicated in 39 (13.9%), carbamazepine in 29 (10.3%), phenytoin in 27 (9.6%) and cotrimoxazole in 26 (9.3%) cases. Carbamazepine, allopurinol and cotrimoxazole were the three main causative drugs of SJS/TEN accounting for 24.0%, 18.8% and 12.5% respectively of the 96 cases seen whereas DRESS was mainly caused by allopurinol (10 cases, 52.6%) and phenytoin (3 cases, 15.8%). Discussion The reaction patterns and drugs causing cutaneous ADRs in our population are similar to those seen in other countries although we have a much higher proportion of severe cutaneous ADRs probably due to referral bias, different prescribing habit and a higher prevalence of HLA‐B*1502 and HLA‐B*5801 which are genetic markers for carbamazepine‐induced SJS/TEN and allopurinol‐induced SJS/TEN/DRESS respectively. Conclusion The most common reaction pattern seen in our study population was maculopapular eruptions. Antibiotics, anticonvulsants and NSAIDs were the most frequently implicated drug groups. Carbamazepine and allopurinol were the two main causative drugs of severe ADRs in our population.     

DRESS syndrome associated with carbamazepine and phenytoin

Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome reflects a serious hypersensitivity reaction to drugs. Its clinical manifestations include diffuse maculopapular rash, exfoliative dermatitis, facial edema, lymphadenopathy, fever, multivisceral involvement and it is associated with a high mortality rate. We report a 62-year-old patient suffering from epilepsia presenting erythroderma following carbamazepine intake. Blood tests revealed eosinophilia, leukocytosis, elevated liver enzymes and high levels of Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP). We applied systemic steroids and anticonvulsant therapy was switched to phenytoin, which had been taken previously without adverse reactions. The skin eruptions persisted and the patient developed fever. Anticonvulsant medication was discontinued and skin eruptions finally resolved under steroid application. This case report demonstrates that cross reactivity between carbamazepine and phenytoin may not only lead to the development but also to the worsening of DRESS syndrome. ECP blood levels may represent a sufficient parameter to monitor the development of DRESS syndrome.     

Syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone associated with limbic encephalitis in a patient with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS)/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe multiorgan reaction with reactivation of herpesviruses. Various features are often seen during the course of the disease. Many aspects of this syndrome suggest close similarities between DIHS/DRESS and graft-versus-host disease. We describe a patient with phenobarbital-induced hypersensitivity syndrome who revealed syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) associated with limbic encephalitis during the course of the disease. In view of previous reports that SIADH and limbic encephalitis are caused by reactivation of latent herpesviruses after transplantation, both conditions may be secondarily caused by reactivation of latent herpesviruses, which is typically observed in DIHS/DRESS. These neurological symptoms should be added to a growing list of important complications of DIHS/DRESS because of the high mortality rate associated with them.     

Hereditary lactate dehydrogenase M‐subunit deficiency with late‐developing pustular psoriasis‐like lesions

Hereditary lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) M‐subunit deficiency is very rare and we have found reports of close to a dozen cases in the published work, two of which were associated with pustular psoriasis‐like lesions. We report a third case of pustular psoriasis‐like eruptions associated with LDH M‐subunit deficiency, which occurred 24 years after the diagnosis of LDH M‐subunit deficiency. These cases indicate that abnormal activity of LDH can induce pustular psoriatic lesions in the long term. Some patients with symptoms of hereditary LDH M‐subunit deficiency have antecedent annular scaly plaque lesions, that resemble psoriatic lesions. We discuss a hypothesis to explain this scenario.     

Intractable genital ulcers from herpes simplex virus reactivation in drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome caused by allopurinol

Background Drug‐induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS/DRESS) is a severe adverse systemic reaction. Reactivation of human herpesvirus (HHV) family members other than HHV‐6 has been reported in patients with DIHS. Reactivation of HHV family members is generally characterized by increased serum antibody titers against the virus. By contrast, clinical symptoms caused by viral reactivation are relatively rare. Method We report a case of DIHS with intractable genital ulcers from reactivation of herpes simplex virus (HSV) in accordance with reactivation of HHV‐6 and cytomegalovirus (CMV). Result Twenty‐two days after the onset of the rash, the patient developed intractable genital ulcers that were resistant to treatment. Histological examination of the ulcers revealed necrotic degeneration in the epidermal cells, with giant cells containing inclusion bodies and marked lymphocytic infiltration in the upper dermis. Immunohistochemical staining with antibodies reactive to HSV or CMV showed that these giant cells were positive for HSV but negative for CMV. Conclusion Genital herpes is a common skin disease. However, our case was considered to be a DIHS‐associated symptom, not an accidental complication, as the symptoms were severe and resistant to treatment.