Central blood pressure variability is increased in hypertensive patients with target organ damage

We aimed to evaluate the association of aortic and brachial short‐term blood pressure variability (BPV) with the presence of target organ damage (TOD) in hypertensive patients. One‐hundred seventy‐eight patients, aged 57 ± 12 years, 33% women were studied. TOD was defined by the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiogram, microalbuminuria, reduced glomerular filtration rate, or increased aortic pulse wave velocity. Aortic and brachial BPV was assessed by 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring (Mobil‐O‐Graph). TOD was present in 92 patients (51.7%). Compared to those without evidence of TOD, they had increased night‐to‐day ratios of systolic and diastolic BP (both aortic and brachial) and heart rate. They also had significant increased systolic BPV, as measured by both aortic and brachial daytime and 24‐hours standard deviations and coefficients of variation, as well as for average real variability. Circadian patterns and short‐term variability measures were very similar for aortic and brachial BP. We conclude that BPV is increased in hypertensive‐related TOD. Aortic BPV does not add relevant information in comparison to brachial BPV.     

动态血压监测在评价老年高血压靶器官损害中的临床价值

目的探讨动态血压监测在评价老年高血压靶器官损害中的临床价值。方法对206例老年高血压患者进行24小时动态血压监测,根据是否有靶器官损害分为单纯高血压组（A组）,合并心脏损害组（B组）,脑损害组（C组）,肾损害组（D组）,多脏器损害组（E组）,对各组动态血压值、血压昼夜节律、血压变异性及血压负荷值进行分析。结果合并脏器损害组的动态血压值、血压负荷值较单纯高血压组明显增高（P〈0．05或P〈0．01）,在多脏器损害组中收缩压变异性明显增大（P〈0．01）;靶器官损害组的血压昼夜节律异常明显增多（P〈0．01）。结论高血压患者24小时动态血压变化对预测高血压并发症的发生和指导合理治疗有重要意义。     

Even mild depression is associated with among-day blood pressure variability,including masked non-dipping assessed by 7-d/24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

Abstract

The effect of mild depression on blood pressure (BP) was assessed in 116 Japanese (32–79 years). As compared to non-depressive (Geriatric Depression Scale, GDS-15 score <5) subjects, mild depressives (GDS-15 score: 1–15) had shorter sleep duration (p?=?0.021), lower subjective quality of life (health: p?=?0.016; life satisfaction: p?<?0.001; and happiness: p?<?0.001), and higher 7-d systolic BP (p?<?0.05). “Masked non-dipping” (dipping on day 1, but non-dipping on at least 1 of the following 6?d) was more frequent among depressive than non-depressive normotensives (p?=?0.008). Among-day BP variability may underlie cardiovascular disease accompanying a key component of psychological depression.     

Assessment of blood pressure in patients with Type 2 diabetes: comparison between home blood pressure monitoring, clinic blood pressure measurement and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

AIMS: To compare a home blood pressure (BP) monitoring device and clinic BP measurement with 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: Fifty-five patients with type 2 DM had BP measured at three consecutive visits to the DM clinic by nurses using a stethoscope and mercury sphygmomanometer (CBP). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP was measured using a Spacelabs 90207 automatic cuff-oscillometric device (ABPM). Subjects were then instructed in how to use a Boots HEM 732B semiautomatic cuff-oscillometric home BP monitoring device and measured BP at home on three specified occasions on each of 4 consecutive days at varying times (HBPM). RESULTS: Correlations between HBPM and ABPM were r = 0.88, P < 0.001 for systolic BP and r = 0.76, P < 0.001 for diastolic BP, with correlations between CBP and ABPM being systolic r = 0.59, P < 0.001, diastolic r = 0.47, P < 0.001. HBPM agreed with ABPM more closely compared with CBP (CBP +10.9/+3.8 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 6.9, 14.8/1.6, 6.1) vs. HBPM +8.2/+3.7 (95% CI 6.0, 10.3/2.0, 5.4)). The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of HBPM in detecting hypertension were 100%, 79% and 90%, respectively, compared with CBP (85%, 46% and 58%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with Type 2 DM, home BP monitoring is superior to clinic BP measurement, when compared with 24-h ambulatory BP, and allows better detection of hypertension. It would be a rational addition to the annual review process. Diabet. Med. 18, 431-437 (2001)     

动态血压联合家庭血压监测对慢性心力衰竭患者血压变异性及预后的指导意义

目的 对慢性心力衰竭（CHF）患者使用动态血压联合家庭血压监测,观察其对血压变异性（BPV）和预后的指导意义。方法 入选192例CHF患者随机分为联合监测组（n=97）和对照组（n=95）。对所有患者进行为期1年的随访,采用常规的门诊预约随访,随访间隔为1个月。联合监测组患者采用家庭血压监测模式进行CHF的监测随访,每日早晚测量的血压和脉率值通过手机传输给中央系统,由我院心血管内科专人负责中央系统维护和每位患者血压监测观察。当中央系统发现某位患者血压波动异常或脉率波动异常时,将电话通知该位患者增加血压、脉率测量次数或增加门诊随访次数,并及时调整CHF的治疗方案。所有患者在入组前、随访6月行动态血压监测,并收集记录所有数据。观察记录所有患者随访一年中的以下心血管事件：非计划性随访、心源性死亡、恶性心律失常、再次因心力衰竭住院。结果 入组前两组患者杓型血压患者所占比例没有统计学差异（P>0.05）。在随访6个月后,联合监测组患者杓型血压比例明显高于入组前水平（36.08% VS. 13.40%, P=0.004）,且高于随访6个月后对照组杓型血压患者比例（36.08% VS. 16.84%, P=0.012）。24h PR在入组前两组患者没有统计学差异（P>0.05）。在随访6个月后,两组患者的24h PR较入组前均明显降低（P<0.05）。6个月的随访后联合监测组患者24h PR明显低于对照组24h PR（70.14±13.42 VS. 77.02±16.15, P=0.002）。入组前两组患者24hSBPV和24hDBPV没有统计学差异（P>0.05）。随访6个月后联合监测组患者24hSBPV和24hDBPV均低于入组前水平,并低于随访6个月后对照组患者（P均<0.05）。联合监测组患者非计划性随访发生比例（11.34% VS. 24.21%, P=0.032）、再次住院发生比例（6.19% VS. 17.89%, P=0.023）和恶性心律失常发生比例（3.09% VS. 11.58%, P=0.047）明显低于对照组患者。结论 动态血压联合家庭血压监测模式较传统的门诊随访进一步降低血压变异性,增加杓型血压比例,并能改善CHF患者预后,值得临床推广。     

Ten‐year changes in ambulatory blood pressure: The prognostic value of ambulatory pulse pressure

Blood pressure (BP) changes and risk factors associated with pulse pressure (PP) increase in elderly people have rarely been studied using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The aim is to evaluate 10‐year ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) changes in older hypertensives, focusing on PP and its associations with mortality. An observational study was conducted on 119 consecutive older treated hypertensives evaluated at baseline (T0) and after 10 years (T1). Treatment adherence was carefully assessed. The authors considered clinical parameters at T1 only in survivors (n = 87). Patients with controlled ABP both at T0 and T1 were considered as having sustained BP control. Change in 24‐hour PP between T0 and T1 (Δ24‐hour PP) was considered for the analyses. Mean age at T0: 69.4 ± 3.7 years. Females: 57.5%. Significant decrease in 24‐hour, daytime, and nighttime diastolic BP (all P < .05) coupled with an increase in 24‐hour, daytime, and nighttime PP (all P < .05) were observed at T1. Sustained daytime BP control was associated with lower 24‐hour PP increase than nonsustained daytime BP control (+2.23 ± 9.36 vs +7.79 ± 8.64 mm Hg; P = .037). The association between sustained daytime BP control and Δ24‐hour PP remained significant even after adjusting for age, sex, and 24‐hour PP at T0 (β=0.39; P = .035). Both 24‐hour systolic BP and 24‐hour PP at T0 predicted mortality (adjusted HR 1.07, P = .001; adjusted HR 1.25, P < .001, respectively). After ROC comparison (P = .001), 24‐hour PP better predicted mortality than 24‐hour systolic BP. The data confirm how ABP control affects vascular aging leading to PP increase. Both ambulatory PP and systolic BP rather than diastolic BP predict mortality in older treated hypertensives.     

Home blood pressure monitoring in France: Device possession rate and associated determinants,the Esteban study

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is increasingly being promoted in hypertension guidelines to improve hypertension management. Possessing a HBPM device could improve blood pressure (BP) control and prognostic impact. The aims of this study were to estimate the possession rate of HBPM devices in the French population and in hypertensive adults, and to investigate the determinants of possessing such devices at home. Cross‐sectional analyses were performed using data from the Esteban survey, which comprised a representative sample of the French population. Among the 2,054 study participants, 673 had hypertension. Of these, 385 were aware they had it. Weighted logistic regressions were performed to investigate the factors (socioeconomic, clinical, drug treatment, and healthcare visits) associated with possessing a HBPM device. 20.9% of the study sample, 42.1% of those with hypertension, and 54% of those aware of their hypertension, possessed a HBPM device. Female gender (OR = 2.03, 95%CI [1.46; 2.60]), smoking (OR = 2.33, 95%CI [1.51; 3.15]), antihypertensive drugs (OR = 1.75, 95%CI [1.06; 2.44]), general practitioner (GP) visits (OR = 3.28, 95%CI [1.84; 4.68]), and diabetes (OR = 0.41 95% CI [0.14; 0.68]) were associated with possessing a HBPM device among those aware of their hypertension. Over 20% of the study population possessed a HBPM device at home. This proportion rose to one in two in those aware or their hypertension. Among the latter, possessing a device was positively associated with female gender, GP visits, and antihypertensive drug use. Increasing possession of HBPM devices in the hypertensive population could foster better management of the condition.     

Dialysis unit blood pressure two hours after hemodialysis is useful for predicting home blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure in maintenance hemodialysis patients

This study aimed to determine which BP measurement obtained in the HD unit correlated best with home BP and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM). We retrospectively analyzed data from 40 patients that received maintenance HD who had available home BP and ABPM data. Dialysis unit BPs were the averages of pre-, 2hr- (2 h after starting HD), and post-HD BP during a 9-month study. Home BP was defined as the average of morning and evening home BPs. Dialysis unit BP and home BP were compared over the 9-month study period. ABPM was performed once for 24 h in the absence of dialysis during the final 2 weeks of the study period and was compared to the 2-week dialysis unit BP and home BP. There was a significant difference between dialysis unit systolic blood pressure (SBP) and home SBP over the 9-month period. No significant difference was observed between the 2hr-HD SBP and home SBP. When analyzing 2 weeks of dialysis unit BP and home BP, including ABPM, SBPs were significantly different (dialysis unit BP > home BP > ABPM; P = 0.009). Consistent with the 9-month study period, no significant difference was observed between 2hr-HD SBP and home SBP (P = 0.809). The difference between 2hr-HD SBP and ambulatory SBP was not significant (P = 0.113). In conclusion, the 2hr-HD SBP might be useful for predicting home BP and ABPM in HD patients.     

GeogRaphic and socioecoNomic Distribution of real-world Indian data of home blood pressure monitoring (GRAND Study): Study protocol for an observational study in 18 medical centers across India

One-fourth of death in India is attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and more than 80% is related to ischemic heart disease and stroke. The main risk factor for CVD is hypertension. Every third person in India suffers from hypertension and the prevalence increased drastically in the past 20 years, especially among the youngest age group of 20 and 44 years. Regardless of being under anti-hypertension medication, the blood pressure (BP) control rate in the country is still low ranging between 6% and 28% only. Assessing the “true BP control rate” should be performed using both clinic BP measurement and out-of-office BP measurement as the latter shows better prognosis for patients’ hypertension and CVD outcomes. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) shows superiority over ambulatory BP measurement as multiple measurements can be collected at the patient's convenience. Only limited evidence on HBPM in India is available and it's either lacking in hypertension participants or of a small sample size. This study will investigate the real BP control status among 2000 hypertensive patients from 18 centers in 12 states across Pan-India. The outcome of this study will emphasize the value of establishing BP control management practice guidelines suitable for physicians and help policymakers in building proper strategies for hypertension management to reduce the CVD burden on the health situation in India.     

Association between real‐world home blood pressure measurement patterns and blood pressure variability among older individuals with hypertension: A community‐based blood pressure variability study

Home blood pressure (BP) monitoring is a useful tool for hypertension management. BP variability (BPV) has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. However, little is known about the correlation between BPV and different measurement patterns of long‐term home BP monitoring. This longitudinal cohort study aimed to assess the associations between dynamic BP measurement patterns and BPV. A total of 1128 participants (mean age, 77.4 ± 9.3 years; male, 51%) with 23 269 behavior measuring units were included. We used sliding window sampling to classify the home BP data with a regular 6‐month interval into units in a sliding manner until the data are not continuous. Three measurement patterns (stable frequent [SF], stable infrequent [SI], and unstable [US]) were assessed based on the home BP data obtained within the first 3 months of the study, and the data in the subsequent 3 months were used to assess the BPV of that unit. We used linear mixed‐effects model to assess the association between BP measurement patterns and BPV with adjustment for possible confounding factors including average BP. Average real variability and coefficient variability were used as measures of the BPV. No significant differences were observed in average BP between the SF, SI, and US patterns. However, BPV in the SF group was significantly lower than that in the US and SI groups (all p‐values < .05). The BPV in SI and US groups was not significantly different. A stable and frequent BP measuring pattern was independently associated with a lower BPV.     

老年原发性高血压患者血压晨峰现象对靶器官影响的临床研究

目的研究老年原发性高血压患者血压晨峰现象，明确其对主要靶器官结构及功能的潜在损害。方法采用24h动态血压监测仪分析88例老年高血压患者的血压，确认晨峰组与非晨峰组，均常规检查血脂、空腹血糖、测定尿微量白蛋白（UALB），计算体质量指数（BMI）、左心室质量指数（LVMI）、心电图计算QT离散度（QTcd）。结果晨峰组的24h白昼、夜间平均收缩压均显著高于非晨峰组动态血压监测水平，晨峰组的LVMI、QTcd和UALB指标均高于非晨峰组（P〈0．05）；2组BMI、血脂、血糖差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论血压晨峰使靶器官损害增加，因此遏制原发性高血压患者的晨峰反应对降压达标和减缓靶器官受累程度具有重要意义。     

BASIS: The blood pressure awareness and insight scale

Impaired illness awareness or not accepting that one has hypertension (HTN) may be an important predictor of treatment adherence and optimal blood pressure control. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of available instruments to evaluate HTN awareness, and subsequently present a novel scale that measures the core domains of subjective illness awareness in HTN. Based on the absence of any validated HTN specific measure identified through our review, the Blood Pressure Awareness and Insight Scale (BASIS) was developed ( www.illnessawarenessscales.com ). An online survey platform was used to collect data on 100 participants. BASIS showed good concurrent (r(98) = .65, P < 0.001) and discriminant validity, internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .75), and 1‐month test‐retest reliability (ICC = 0.77). BASIS is a comprehensive, easy‐to‐use instrument specifically designed to measure subjective HTN awareness. BASIS may be used in research studies and clinical practice to assess the impact of HTN awareness on treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.     

Hypertensive target organ damage is better associated with central than brachial blood pressure: The Northern Shanghai Study

To compare central and brachial blood pressure (BP) in the association of target organ damage (TOD) in a community‐based elderly population, 1599 (aged 71.4 ± 6.1 years) participants in northern Shanghai were recruited. TOD included left ventricular hypertrophy (n = 1556), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (n = 1524), carotid plaque (n = 1558), arteriosclerosis (n = 1485), and microalbuminuria (n = 1516). Both central and brachial BP significantly correlated with TOD. In full‐model regression, central BP was significantly associated with all TOD (P ≤ .04), whereas brachial BP was only significantly associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and arteriosclerosis (P ≤ .01). Similarly, in stepwise regression, central BP was significantly associated with left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, arteriosclerosis, and microalbuminuria (P ≤ .04), while brachial BP was not associated with any TOD. Receiver operating characteristic analyses indicated that central BP identified arteriosclerosis and microalbuminuria better than brachial BP (P ≤ .01). In conclusion, central BP showed superiority over brachial BP in the association of hypertensive TOD in a community‐based elderly population.     

Morning pulse pressure is associated more strongly with elevated albuminuria than systolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Post hoc analysis of a cross-sectional multicenter study

Aims

Recently, focus has been directed toward pulse pressure as a potentially independent risk factor for micro- and macrovascular disease. This study was designed to examine the relationship between pulse pressure taken at home and elevated albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

This study is a post hoc analysis of a cross-sectional multicenter study. Home blood pressure measurements were performed for 14 consecutive days in 858 patients with type 2 diabetes. We investigated the relationship between systolic blood pressure or pulse pressure in the morning or in the evening and urinary albumin excretion using univariate and multivariate analyses. Furthermore, we measured area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) to compare the ability to identify elevated albuminuria, defined as urinary albumin excretion equal to or more than 30 mg/g creatinine, of systolic blood pressure or pulse pressure.

Results

Morning systolic blood pressure (β = 0.339, P < 0.001) and morning pulse pressure (β = 0.378, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with logarithm of urinary albumin excretion independent of other potential co-factors. AUC for elevated albuminuria in morning systolic blood pressure and morning pulse pressure were 0.668 (0.632–0.705; P < 0.001) and 0.694 (0.659–0.730; P < 0.001), respectively. AUC of morning pulse pressure was significantly greater than that of morning systolic blood pressure (P = 0.040).

Conclusions

Our findings implicate that morning pulse pressure is associated with elevated albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes, which suggests that lowering morning pulse pressure could prevent the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy.     

The first study comparing a wearable watch‐type blood pressure monitor with a conventional ambulatory blood pressure monitor on in‐office and out‐of‐office settings

Wearable blood pressure (BP) monitoring devices which measure BP levels accurately both in and out of the office are valuable for hypertension management using digital technology. The authors have conducted the first comparison study of BPs measured by a recently developed wrist‐worn watch‐type oscillometric BP monitoring (WBPM) device, the “HeartGuide,” versus BPs measured by an ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) device, A&D TM‐2441, in the office (total of 4 readings alternately measured in the sitting position) and outside the office (30‐minutes interval measurements during daytime) in 50 consecutive patients (mean age 66.1 ± 10.8 years). The 2 BP monitoring devices were simultaneously worn on the same non‐dominant arm throughout the monitoring period. The mean difference (±SD) in systolic BPs (average of 2 readings) between WBPM and ABPM was 0.8 ± 12.8 mm Hg (P = .564) in the office and 3.2 ± 17.0 mm Hg (P < .001) outside the office. The proportion of differences that were within ±10 mm Hg was 58.7% in the office and 47.2% outside the office. In a mixed‐effects model analysis, the temporal trend in the difference between the out‐of‐office BPs measured by the two devices was not statistically significant. In conclusion, the difference between the WBPM and ABPM device was acceptable both in and out of the office.     

Home blood pressure telemonitoring for improving blood pressure control in middle‐aged and elderly patients with hypertension

The blood pressure (BP) control rate among treated hypertensives in China remains low at 37.5%. The relationship between home blood pressure telemonitoring (HBPT) and BP control is controversial. The authors aimed to investigate the relationship between HBPT and BP control in middle‐aged and elderly hypertensives. In total, 252 hypertension patients aged between 60 and 79 years were enrolled. The patients were given either HBPT through interactive platforms between physicians and patients (telemonitoring group, n = 126) or conventional management (routine management group, n = 126). All patients were followed‐up for 15 months. BP control was defined as home systolic blood pressure < 135 mm Hg and home diastolic blood pressure < 85 mm Hg. At baseline, there were no significant differences in the baseline BP control rate (p = .083). However, after 15 months, the BP control rate improved in both groups, and the telemonitoring group (71.3%) had a significantly higher BP control than the routine management group (49.8%) (p < .001). The change of BP control rate from baseline in the routine management group increased by 26.1%, and that of the telemonitoring group increased by 35.4%. The results of the fully adjusted binary logistic regression showed that HBPT was positively associated with BP control after adjusting for confounders (OR = 4.15, 95% CI 2.05–8.39). Similar results were observed after 3, 9, and 12 months. The association of HBPT with BP control was similar in subgroups. In conclusions, HBPT is recommended for BP control in middle‐aged and elderly hypertensives in the community setting.     

Current status of home blood pressure monitoring in Asia: Statement from the HOPE Asia Network

Hypertension represents a major burden in Asia, with a high prevalence rate but poor level of awareness and control reported in many countries in the region. Home blood pressure monitoring has been validated as an accurate and reliable measure of blood pressure that can help guide hypertension treatment as well as identify masked and white‐coat hypertension. Despite its benefits, there has been limited research into home blood pressure monitoring in Asia. The authors reviewed the current evidence on home blood pressure monitoring in Asia, including but not limited to published literature, data presented at congresses, and national hypertension management guidelines to determine the current utilization of home blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice in the region. Public policies to enable greater access to home blood pressure monitoring and its use in clinical care would add considerably to improving hypertension outcomes in Asia.     

高血压病患者血压变异性与靶器官损害的相关性研究

目的为评价高血压病患者血压变异性与靶器官损害程度的关系。方法对１５例正常人及４３例高血压病患者按临床分期进行了２４小时无创性动态血压监测。结果高血压病Ⅲ期组２４小时、日间及夜间的收缩压、舒张压的血压变异系数（ＣＶ）均显著大于Ⅱ期组和Ｉ期组（Ｐ＜０．０５）,Ⅱ期组的２４小时、日间的收缩压、舒张压和夜间的舒张压的血压变异系数亦显著大于１期组（Ｐ＜０．０５）;血压变异度（ＳＤ）Ⅲ期组２４小时、日间及夜间的收缩压、舒张压和Ⅱ期组２４小时收缩压、日间收缩压明显高于Ｉ期组（Ｐ＜０．０５）。高血压病Ⅲ期、Ⅱ期组的血压变异系数明显大于对照组（Ｐ＜０．０５）;血压变异度Ⅲ期组以及Ⅱ期组的２４小时收缩压、日间收缩压和夜间收缩压、舒张压显著大于对照组（Ｐ＜０．０５）,高血压病Ｉ期组的血压变异系数及血压变异度与对照组相比,无显著差异。结论随着靶器官损害加重,血压变异性亦增大,血压变异系数不受降压药物治疗的影响,应用动态血压监测高血压病患者的血压变异系数对评价靶器官的损害程度有一定价值。