Transfusion-related immunomodulation by platelets is dependent on their expression of MHC Class I molecules and is independent of white cells

BACKGROUND: Transfusion‐related immunomodulation (TRIM) has been correlated with the presence of white cells (WBCs) in blood transfusions, but the role of components such as platelets (PLTs) in mediating TRIM has not been extensively examined. We designed a murine PLT transfusion model to study whether leukoreduced PLTs mediate TRIM effects. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: CBA recipient mice were administered four weekly transfusions of either fresh (4 hr) or aged (24 and 72 hr) donor leukoreduced PLTs from allogeneic BALB/c mice and then transplanted with skin grafts from donor‐matched mice. TRIM was measured by comparing the times to graft rejection and these were correlated with immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody development measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Compared with nontransfused control recipients, four transfusions of fresh, extremely leukoreduced (<0.05 WBCs/mL), allogeneic PLTs significantly (p < 0.002) reduced the recipient's ability to reject donor‐matched skin grafts (survival >49 days compared with <14 days in nontransfused controls) despite the presence of high‐titered serum IgG donor antibodies. In contrast, however, aged PLTs or fresh PLTs devoid of MHC Class I molecules were unable to affect skin graft survival nor stimulate antibody production. The PLT age‐related inability to induce TRIM was shown to be due to loss of PLT‐associated MHC Class I molecules; soluble supernatant MHC molecules that were transfused were unable to induce TRIM. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that fresh PLTs can induce TRIM independently of WBCs due to their MHC antigen expression whereas aging results in loss of MHC and ability to mediate TRIM. The findings support the concept that either active MHC removal from fresh PLTs or passive removal by, for example, storage, may reduce any deleterious effects of TRIM in transfusion recipients.     

In vitro and in vivo quality of leukoreduced apheresis platelets stored in a new platelet additive solution

BACKGROUND: Platelets (PLTs) stored in additive solutions (PASs) may reduce the risk of several plasma‐associated adverse transfusion reactions such as allergic reactions and potentially transfusion‐associated lung injury. The objective of this study was to determine the in vitro characteristics and the in vivo radiolabeled recovery and survival of apheresis PLTs (APs) stored in a new PAS and compare the latter to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Hyperconcentrated APs were collected from healthy subjects in a paired crossover study comparing PAS (35% plasma) and 100% plasma‐stored APs (Part 1) up to 7 days and, in Part 2, to determine the in vivo recovery and survival of PAS stored AP at 5 days compared to fresh PLT controls. In vitro and in vivo assays were performed following standard methods. RESULTS: Sixty‐six and 25 evaluable subjects successfully completed Parts 1 and 2, respectively. pH for PAS AP was maintained above 6.6 for 5 days of storage. P‐selectin values were consistent with published values for commonly transfused PLT products. The PAS in vivo PLT recovery (54.3 ± 8.1%) was 86.7% of the fresh control, and survival (6.4 ± 1.3 days) was 78.0% of the fresh control, both meeting the FDA performance criteria. CONCLUSION: APs stored in PAS with 35% plasma carryover maintained pH over 5 days of storage and met current FDA criteria for radiolabeled recovery and survival. The use of PAS for storage of single‐donor PLTs in clinical practice represents an acceptable transfusion product that reduces the volume of plasma associated with PLT transfusion.     

Pathogen inactivation of platelets using ultraviolet C light: effect on in vitro function and recovery and survival of platelets

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effect of treating platelets (PLTs) using ultraviolet (UV)C light without the addition of any photosensitizing chemicals on PLT function in vitro and PLT recovery and survival in an autologous radiolabeled volunteer study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: For in vitro studies, pooled or single buffy coat–derived PLT concentrates (PCs) were pooled and split to obtain identical PCs that were either treated with UVC or untreated (n = 6 each) and stored for 7 days. PLT recovery and survival were determined in a two‐arm parallel autologous study in healthy volunteers performed according to BEST guidelines. UVC‐treated or untreated PCs (n = 6 each) were stored for 5 days and were compared to fresh PLTs from the same donor. RESULTS: There were no significant differences on Day 7 of storage between paired UVC‐treated and control PC units for pH, adenosine triphosphate, lactate dehydrogenase, CD62P, CD63, PLT microparticles, and JC‐1 binding, but annexin V binding, lactate accumulation, and expression of CD41/61 were significantly higher in treated units (p < 0.05). Compared with control units, the recovery and survival of UVC‐treated PC were reduced after 5 days of storage (p < 0.05) and when expressed as a percentage of fresh values, survival was reduced by 20% (p = 0.005) and recovery by 17% (p = 0.088). CONCLUSION: UVC‐treated PLTs stored for 5 days showed marginal changes in PLT metabolism and activation in vitro and were associated with a degree of reduction in recovery and survival similar to other pathogen inactivation systems that are licensed and in use.     

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of apheresis platelets stored for 5 days in 65% platelet additive solution/35% plasma

BACKGROUND: In the United States, apheresis platelets (PLTs) are suspended in autologous plasma. PLT additive solutions, long used in Europe, decrease recipient allergic reactions and may reduce the risk of transfusion‐related acute lung injury. We evaluated Amicus‐collected PLTs stored in platelet additive solution (PAS) III (InterSol) for 5 days. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In Study 1, 71 subjects donated two products on a single day—one each stored in 100% plasma or 65% PAS III/35% plasma. Products underwent standard in vitro testing on Days 1 and 5. In Study 2, 43 additional subjects provided Amicus products stored for 5 days in 65% PAS III/35% plasma for in vivo radiolabeled recovery and survival determinations. The effect of approximately 2500 cGy Day 1 gamma irradiation was evaluated in a subset of products. RESULTS: PAS III PLTs (n = 70) had a median Day 5 pH_22°C of 7.2 (lower 95%, 95% tolerance limit, 6.9). Mean Day 5 recovery and survival of radiolabeled PAS III PLTs (n = 33) were, respectively, 80.5 and 72.1%, of fresh autologous PLTs. With 95% confidence, these values were at least 66% of fresh PLT recovery and 58% of survival. All in vitro variables remained within ranges seen in licensed products for irradiated and nonirradiated PAS III PLTs. CONCLUSION: Leukoreduced Amicus PLTs stored in 65% PAS III/35% plasma in PL‐2410 containers maintained pH ≥ 6.9 throughout 5 days' storage. Radiolabeled PLT recovery and survival values met US Food and Drug Administration statistical criteria. Gamma‐irradiated PAS III PLTs demonstrated no significant adverse effects due to irradiation in in vitro testing.     

Viability and function of 8-day-stored apheresis platelets

BACKGROUND: Methods of bacterial detection and pathogen inactivation of platelets (PLTs) may allow extended storage of PLTs as long as PLT quality is maintained. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty normal volunteers had their PLTs collected with an apheresis machine (Haemonetics Corp.). A variety of in vitro PLT function and metabolic assays were performed both on Day 0 and after 8 days of storage. On Day 8, a small blood sample was drawn from each donor to obtain fresh PLTs. The fresh and stored autologous PLTs were labeled with either (51)Cr or (111)In, and the radiolabeled PLTs were transfused. Posttransfusion serial blood samples were drawn to determine the relative posttransfusion recoveries and survivals of the fresh versus the stored PLTs. RESULTS: Although the in vitro assays showed some differences between the two trial sites, the results were generally within the ranges expected for fresh and stored PLTs. Overall, PLT recoveries averaged 66 +/- 16 percent versus 53 +/- 20 percent and survivals averaged 8.5 +/- 1.6 days versus 5.6 +/- 1.6 days, respectively, for fresh compared to 8-day-stored PLTs. There were no significant differences in the in vivo PLT data between the trial sites or based on the radiolabel used for the measurements. CONCLUSION: After 8 days of storage, the in vivo posttransfusion recovery and survival of autologous Haemonetics apheresis PLTs meet the proposed standards for poststorage PLT quality.     

Removal by adsorbent beads of biological response modifiers released from platelets,accumulated during storage,and potentially associated with platelet transfusion reactions

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that biological response modifiers (BRMs) released from platelets (PLTs) during storage may have a clinical significance in PLT transfusion reactions. Washing PLTs and partial substitution of plasma with artificial solutions reduce transfusion reactions, but the washing procedure is time‐consuming, and partial plasma substitution is not sufficient to completely eliminate transfusion reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study determined the levels of three BRMs: soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L); regulated upon activation, normal T‐cell expressed, and secreted (RANTES, CCL5); and transforming growth factor‐β1 (TGF‐β1). These BRMs were released from PLTs during storage up to Day 10. To selectively remove these BRMs, four types of cellulose beads were investigated. The levels of these three BRMs in plasma derived from PLT concentrates (PCs) stored for 10 days or in PCs stored for 5 days were determined after treatment with or without each adsorbent bead for 3 hours. RESULTS: These three BRMs accumulated in proportion to the storage duration. The 3‐hour treatment with cellulose beads possessing sulfate ester groups (A) or phosphate ester groups (B) effectively removed sCD40L and RANTES and partly removed TGF‐β1. In addition, although PLT activation was minimally induced, PLT counts decreased by approximately 13% to 30%, after these treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that Cellulose Beads A or B are effective in removing the three BRMs that accumulate during PLT storage. Additional in vitro assays and in vivo studies are required to evaluate whether this method is effective in reducing transfusion reactions.     

Platelet concentrates prepared after a 20- to 24-hour hold of the whole blood at 22°C

BACKGROUND: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that red blood cells must be refrigerated within 8 hours of whole blood collection. Longer storage of whole blood at 22°C before component preparation would have many advantages. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two methods of holding whole blood for 20 to 24 hours at room temperature were evaluated, refrigerated plates or a 23°C incubator. After extended whole blood storage, platelet (PLT) concentrates were prepared from PLT‐rich plasma on Day 1 postdonation, and the PLTs were stored for 6 more days. On Day 7 of PLT storage, blood was drawn from each subject to prepare fresh PLTs. The stored and fresh PLTs were radiolabeled and transfused into their donor. RESULTS: Eleven subjects' whole blood was stored using refrigerated butanediol plates (Compocool, Fresenius), and 10 using an incubator. Poststorage PLT recoveries averaged 47 ± 13% versus 53 ± 11% and survivals averaged 4.6 ± 1.7 days versus 4.7 ± 0.9 days for Compocool versus incubator storage, respectively (p = NS). With all results, poststorage PLT recoveries averaged 75 ± 10% of fresh and survivals 57 ± 13% of fresh; PLT recoveries met FDA guidelines for poststorage PLT viability but not survivals. CONCLUSION: Seven‐day poststorage PLT viability is comparable when whole blood is stored for 22 ± 2 hours at 22°C using either refrigerated plates or an incubator to maintain temperature before preparing PLT concentrates.     

In vivo recovery of human platelets in severe combined immunodeficient mice as a measure of platelet damage

BACKGROUND: Clinical performance of human platelet (PLT) products processed or stored under novel conditions is difficult to predict based on in vitro studies alone. Recovery and survival of radiolabeled PLTs in human subjects are used as surrogate markers for PLT efficacy in development of new products. Such experiments pose some risk to the participants, can be a financial burden on the sponsor, and may stifle innovation and development of new PLT products. Animal models for in vivo recovery and survival of human PLTs are limited by rapid, immune-mediated clearance of human cells. The severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice allowed prolonged circulation of human PLTs and were used to detect differences in recovery and survival between chemically damaged, aged PLTs, or normal PLTs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Human PLTs were transfused into SCID and wild-type (WT) mice, and the recoveries and survival times were detected in mouse whole blood by flow cytometry with an anti-human CD41-fluorescein isothiocyanate monoclonal antibody. Recoveries of damaged PLTs were compared to normal PLTs. RESULTS: Recoveries were significantly shorter in WT than in SCID mice at 4 hours after transfusion (WT, 20.8 +/- 5.4%, n = 12; SCID, 63.8 +/- 8.4%, n = 10) and with a t((1/2)) estimate of 2 hours for WT and 7 hours for SCID mice. Human PLTs damaged either by chemical treatment or by improper storage exhibited decreased recoveries in SCID mice. CONCLUSION: The SCID mouse model can detect differences between damaged and control human PLTs and could be useful in evaluating novel PLT collection, processing, and storage technologies that may impact PLT quality.     

Pressure‐aided transfusion of platelets: does it affect the platelets?

BACKGROUND: In massively bleeding patients, pressure infusers are used for transfusion of red blood cells and plasma but not for platelets (PLTs) due to an assumed negative effect on the PLTs. This study examined whether pressure‐aided in vitro transfusion affected the number, activation state, and/or function of the PLTs as measured by flow cytometry and thrombelastography (TEG). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PLT concentrates stored for 1 (n = 8) or 8 (n = 7) days were transfused in vitro by means of a pressure inducer (300 mmHg). Samples before and after transfusion were measured for PLT concentration and expression of CD62P, CD63, and PAC‐1. These activation markers were measured by flow cytometry on resting PLTs as well as PLTs stimulated with thrombin receptor–activating peptide. Clot generation and strength was examined by TEG by measuring the angle (degree) and maximum amplitude (mm), values that are highly dependent on the PLT function. RESULTS: PLT concentrations were unchanged after pressure‐aided transfusion reflecting no destruction. With respect to activation state and in vitro functional capacity either no or only minor differences (<7%) were detected. CONCLUSION: In this study, use of a pressure inducer decreased the transfusion time of in vitro PLT transfusion by approximately 50%. No or only minor and inconsistent changes of the PLT number and function were observed. Consequently, this study indicates that pressure infusers could be used for transfusion of PLTs if clinically indicated, that is, in massively bleeding patients. However, in vivo studies to assess the safety and utility of pressure‐aided PLT transfusion are warranted.     

Paired in vitro and in vivo comparison of apheresis platelet concentrates stored in platelet additive solution for 1 versus 7 days

BACKGROUND: To improve clinical access to platelet concentrates (PCs), prolonging the storage period is one alternative, provided that they are free from bacteria. The quality of platelets (PLTs) stored for 1 versus 7 days was compared by in vitro analyses and in vivo recovery and survival in blood donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Apheresis PCs from 10 donors were divided and stored in PLT additive solution in 2 equal units for a paired comparison. PLTs in one unit were (111)In-labeled at 1 day of storage, and PLTs in the other unit were labeled after 7 days of storage. PLTs were injected into the donor after labeling and samples were drawn after 30, 60, and 150 minutes and thereafter once a day for 14 days for recovery and survival measurements. RESULTS: PLT recovery on Day 7 was 80 percent of the recovery on Day 1 (p<0.05), and the survival on Day 7 was 65 percent of survival on Day 1 (p<0.005). No significant differences were seen regarding mean PLT volume (MPV), pH, pCO2, pO2, bicarbonate, or hypotonic shock response. Lactate increased and lactic dehydrogenase increased slightly, whereas glucose and ATP decreased, but not to a critical level. A significant increase in RANTES (110.7+/-76.6 vs. 277.6+/-50.8 pg/10(6) PLTs [p<0.005]) and PLT factor 4 (19.9+/-9.6 vs. 59.8+/-7.5 IU/10(6) PLTs [p<0.0001]) was noticed during storage. CONCLUSION: Recovery and survival of PCs stored for 7 days decreased, but met suggested criteria. Analyzed in vitro parameters showed acceptable results. Randomized patient transfusion studies will provide additional verification of the suitability of 7-day storage of PLTs.     

Function of platelets in apheresis platelet concentrates and in patient blood after transfusion as assessed by Impact‐R

BACKGROUND: Platelet (PLT) transfusion is a mainstream therapy for preventing or treating bleeding episodes in patients with thrombocytopenia. The efficacy is usually estimated from the corrected count increment of PLTs after transfusion, which does not assess PLT function. We therefore evaluated PLT function in blood samples of patients with thrombocytopenia before and after transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PLT function was assessed in 24 chemotherapy‐treated patients and in the PLT concentrates (PCs) by the Impact‐R (DiaMed). This device evaluates PLT adhesion and aggregation recorded as surface coverage (%) and size of aggregates (AS µm²). P‐selectin expression was determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: The PCs were stored for a median of 70 hours before transfusion. An analysis stratified by the median storage of PCs (<70 hr or >70 hr) showed no differences in the SC, the AS, and P‐selectin expression between these concentrates' groups. Transfusion resulted in an increase of adhering PLTs in the patients after transfusion. There were no differences in the AS and in P‐selectin expression before and after transfusion, but the AS increased after transfusion upon ex vivo exposure to adenosine 5′‐diphosphate. P‐selectin expression was significantly lower in the patient group receiving PCs stored for more than 70 hours. CONCLUSION: The current trial shows the feasibility of using the Impact‐R to assess the function of transfused PLTs in the patient's blood stream.     

Monitoring survival and function of transfused platelets in Bernard-Soulier syndrome by flow cytometry and a cone and plate(let) analyzer (Impact-R)

BACKGROUND: Bernard-Soulier syndrome (BSS) patients may repeatedly require transfusion of platelets (PLTs). The hemostatic competence of transfused PLTs requires monitoring. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Flow cytometry and a cone and plate(let) analyzer (Impact-R, DiaMed) were used to monitor survival and function of transfused PLTs in a 7-year-old girl with BSS undergoing surgery. Flow cytometry was applied to differentiate autologous PLTs from transfused PLTs by staining for CD42b. The Impact, which measures PLT adhesion and aggregation in response to high shear stress, was used to evaluate PLT function. RESULTS: Transfused PLTs were detectable by flow cytometry for 1 week after transfusion. While the patient's PLTs did not respond to high shear stress before transfusion, a normal response was documented by the Impact on the day after transfusion and 1 week thereafter. CONCLUSION: Transfused PLTs were detectable by flow cytometry, and their functional activity was demonstrated by the Impact.     

Recipient‐derived HPA‐1a antibodies: a cause of prolonged thrombocytopenia after unrelated donor stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND: Patients with human platelet antigen (HPA) specific antibodies in cases of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia and platelet (PLT) refractoriness derive clinical benefit from the use of HPA‐selected PLTs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study describes three patients with underlying diagnoses of acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and myelodysplasia, respectively, who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with unrelated donors matched at the HLA‐A, B, C, Dr, and DQ loci but who failed to achieve an adequate PLT count. Investigation using PLT immunofluorescence test, monoclonal antibody immobilization of PLT antigens assay, and genotyping revealed the presence of recipient‐derived HPA‐1a antibodies. RESULTS: In two patients, anti‐HPA‐1a was detected post‐BMT and in the third patient, anti‐HPA‐1a was detected during pre‐BMT chemotherapy. Despite apparent 100% engraftment of donor cells, the patients' PLT counts failed to recover 9‐10 months posttransplant. The patients remained PLT‐transfusion dependent and failed to achieve satisfactory increments following random donor or HLA‐matched PLT transfusions. After the identification of HPA‐1a antibodies, the patients were supported by HPA‐1a(‐) PLTs and satisfactory posttransfusion PLT increments were obtained. These cases illustrate that HPA‐1a antibodies may remain detectable for 10 months following apparently successful donor engraftment and the disappearance of recipient‐derived HLA antibodies. The prolonged persistence of recipient‐derived PLT‐specific antibodies following BMT has to our knowledge not been described previously. CONCLUSION: HPA‐1a antibodies were associated with protracted PLT‐transfusion dependence and significant hemorrhagic complications. Appropriate and timely laboratory investigation for HPA‐specific antibodiesfollowed by transfusion support with HPA‐selected PLTs provided the cornerstone of the hemostatic management in these cases.     

Screening plateletpheresis donors for HLA antibodies on two high‐throughput platforms and correlation with recipient outcome

BACKGROUND: To determine the prevalence and impact of transfusing plasma containing white blood cell antibodies, we compared two high‐throughput HLA antibody screening assays and prospectively examined the medical records of all platelet (PLT) recipients to detect subtle manifestations of transfusion‐related acute lung injury and other transfusion reactions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serum samples from 136 plateletpheresis donors were tested for HLA Class I and II antibodies using microbead (LABScreen PRA, One Lambda) and microchip (Dynachip, Invitrogen) assays. Electronic medical records of all recipients were reviewed for vital signs and nursing documentation before and after transfusion. RESULTS: In the microchip assay with a cutoff value of 0.25, 2.9% of samples were positive for Class I and 8.9% for Class II antibodies; with a cutoff value of 0.1, the results were 14.9 and 21.6%, respectively. In the microbead assay (normalized background ratio, 1.5), 15% were positive for Class I and 21% for Class II antibodies. The prevalence of HLA antibodies was 17% in donors without pregnancy or transfusion history and 47% in donors with such history. The PLTs were transfused in 265 episodes to 67 patients. There were no reported reactions; however, symptoms or vital sign changes were noted in seven transfusion episodes. The incidence of reactions was 2.7% (2/75) for antibody‐positive units and 2.6% (5/190) for antibody‐negative units. CONCLUSIONS: Microbead and microchip assays yielded similar results. The prevalence of HLA antibodies was greater in donors with a history of pregnancy or transfusion, but no increase in the incidence of transfusion reactions was noted in recipients of components from donors with HLA antibodies.     

A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous radiolabeled in vivo platelet (PLT) recoveries and survivals of 7-day-stored PLT-rich plasma and buffy coat PLTs from the same subjects

BACKGROUND: A recent review concluded that there was inadequate evidence to show a difference between buffy coat (BC) and platelet (PLT)‐rich plasma (PRP) PLT concentrates prepared from whole blood. We hypothesized that 7‐day‐stored BC‐PLTs would have superior autologous recoveries and survivals compared to PRP‐PLTs and that both would meet the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria for poststorage viability. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, crossover study design in healthy subjects who provided informed consent. Each participant donated a unit of whole blood on two occasions. In random order, either BC‐PLTs or PC‐PLTs were prepared after a 20 ± 2°C overnight hold of the whole blood. PLTs were stored under standard conditions. On Day 7, fresh PLTs were prepared from 43 mL of autologous whole blood. The fresh PLTs paired with either BC‐PLTs or PRP‐PLTs were alternately labeled with ¹¹¹In or ⁵¹Cr and simultaneously reinfused to determine recoveries and survivals. In vitro assays were performed on Days 1 and 7. RESULTS: Fourteen subjects completed the study at two sites. No differences in poststorage PLT viabilities were observed between BC‐PLTs and PRP‐PLTs; recovery differences averaged 3.7 ± 2.4% (±SE, p = 0.15) and survival differences averaged 0.48 ± 0.56 days (p = 0.41). Neither type of PLTs met the current FDA criteria for either poststorage PLT recoveries or survivals. CONCLUSION: We were unable to demonstrate that single‐unit BC‐PLTs stored for 7 days have superior poststorage viability compared to PRP‐PLTs. Failure to meet the minimum FDA criteria for poststorage PLT viability raises questions regarding the acceptance thresholds of these metrics.     

Quantitation of coated platelet potential during collection, storage, and transfusion of apheresis platelets

BACKGROUND: Coated platelets (PLTs), a subpopulation of PLTs observed upon dual agonist stimulation with collagen and thrombin, are known to retain several procoagulant α‐granule proteins on their surface. By formation of a highly active membrane‐bound prothrombinase complex, these PLTs represent an important step in the coagulation cascade as a consequence of their ability to generate thrombin at the site of vascular injury. Various clinical observations suggest that higher levels of coated PLTs are associated with thrombosis while a deficiency of coated PLTs results in a bleeding diathesis. Current quality control guidelines for in vitro PLT storage measure PLT viability but no routine evaluation of the hemostatic function of stored PLTs and particularly no estimation of coated PLT potential is performed. Our primary objective was to evaluate if the process of apheresis and storage of PLT units alters the levels of coated PLTs. In addition, we sought to determine how transfusion of stored PLTs into patients with thrombocytopenia affects the patient's coated PLT levels. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Coated PLT levels were analyzed in 13 voluntary PLT donors before donation, in the fresh apheresis product (Trima, CaridianBCT) and in the stored apheresis product just before transfusion. In addition, 10 patients with thrombocytopenia were analyzed for coated PLTs before and after transfusion of a stored PLT product. RESULTS: Coated PLT levels were significantly decreased after the process of apheresis (17% relative decline; p < 0.01) and with prolonged storage (1 to 5 days; 53% relative decline; p < 0.001). Transfusion of stored PLT units did not result in significant increment of coated PLT levels in patients with thrombocytopenia as expected considering the low level of coated PLTs in stored PLT units. Furthermore, there was no suggestion of regeneration of coated PLT potential upon reinfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Isolation and storage of apheresis PLTs by standard blood bank procedures results in a significant decline in coated PLT potential. Reinfusion of stored apheresis PLTs into patients with thrombocytopenia resulted in a predictable change in coated PLT potential with no suggestion of regeneration of lost coated PLT potential.     

Alloimmunization to transfused platelets requires priming of CD4+ T cells in the splenic microenvironment in a murine model

BACKGROUND: Alloantibodies are a clinically significant sequelae of platelet (PLT) transfusion, potentially rendering patients refractory to ongoing PLT transfusion support. These antibodies are often IgG class switched, suggesting the involvement of CD4+ T‐cell help; however, PLT‐specific CD4+ T cells have not been visualized in vivo, and specifics of their stimulation are not completely understood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A murine model of alloimmunization to transfused PLTs was developed to allow in vivo assessment and characterization of CD4+ T cells specific for PLT major histocompatibility complex (MHC) alloantigen. PLTs were harvested from BALB/c mice, filter leukoreduced, and transfused into C57BL/6 recipients. PLT‐specific CD4+ T‐cell responses were visualized by using a T‐cell receptor transgenic mouse that detects peptide from donor MHC I presented on recipient MHC II. Antibody responses were determined by indirect immunofluorescence using BALB/c donor targets. RESULTS: C57BL/6 recipients of BALB/c leukoreduced PLT transfusions produced BALB/c antibodies, with proliferation of antigen‐specific CD4+ T cells seen in the spleen but not lymph nodes or liver. Depletion of recipient CD4+ cells or splenectomy independently abrogated the alloantibody response. CONCLUSION: We report a novel model to study antigen‐specific CD4+ T cells during alloimmunization to PLT transfusion. The presented data support a critical role for CD4+ T‐cell help in the humoral response to PLT transfusion and establish the spleen as a required microenvironment for effective CD4+ T‐cell priming against donor PLT–derived MHC I.     

Decreased platelet aggregation of platelet concentrate during storage recovers in the body after transfusion

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have shown that storage decrease the ability of PLTs to aggregate in the form of PLT concentrate (PC). Nevertheless, there are few reports that have studied the PLT function in blood samples obtained from recipients after PLT transfusion. In this study, this issue was addressed by examining the ability of PLTs to aggregate after being transfused into the blood stream. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PC was transfused to the patients with extremely low PLT counts resulting from chemotherapy. The maximum extent of PLT aggregation and size of the aggregates were compared between PLT in stored PC before transfusion with the PLT-rich plasma (PRP) from the recipients after transfusion and with PRP from patients with moderate decrease in PLT counts after chemotherapy. RESULTS: The maximum extent of PLT aggregation was significantly higher in PRP collected from the patients after transfusion compared to the extent obtained before transfusion. There were no significant differences in the maximum extents of PLT aggregation between the PRP collected from the recipients after PC transfusion and, in the same patients, when PLT counts were moderately low. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the observed decreased in PLT aggregation after storage can improve in the body after transfusion, and transfused PLTs have similar aggregation ability compared to the PLTs derived from the patient.     

Extended storage of platelet‐rich plasma–prepared platelet concentrates in plasma or Plasmalyte

BACKGROUND: Using bacterial detection or pathogen reduction, extended platelet (PLT) storage may be licensed if PLT viability is maintained. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s poststorage PLT acceptance guidelines are that autologous stored PLT recoveries and survivals should be 66 and 58% or greater, respectively, of each donor's fresh PLT data. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Nonleukoreduced PLT concentrates were prepared from whole blood donations. Autologous PLT concentrates from 62 subjects were stored in 100% plasma (n = 44) or 20% plasma/80% Plasmalyte (n = 18), an acetate‐based, non–glucose‐containing crystalloid solution previously used for PLT storage. Fresh PLTs were obtained on the day the donor's stored PLTs were to be transfused. The fresh and stored PLTs were alternately radiolabeled with either ⁵¹chromium or ¹¹¹indium, and in vitro measurements were performed on the stored PLTs. RESULTS: The FDA's PLT recovery criteria were met for 7 days of plasma storage, but PLT survivals maintained viability for only 6 days. Plasmalyte‐stored PLTs did not meet either acceptance criteria after 6 days of storage. After 7 days of storage, PLT recoveries averaged 43 ± 4 and 30 ± 4% and survivals 4.1 ± 0.4 and 2.0 ± 0.2 days for plasma‐ and Plasmalyte‐stored PLTs, respectively (p = 0.03 for recoveries and p < 0.001 for survivals). Poststorage PLT recoveries correlated with the commonly used in vitro PLT quality measurements of hypotonic shock response and annexin V binding, while survivals correlated with extent of shape change, morphology score, and pH. CONCLUSION: There is a progressive decrease in recoveries and survivals of plasma‐stored PLTs over time. PLT viability is better maintained in plasma than Plasmalyte.