Visual performance with night vision goggles after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate visual performance and resolution through night vision goggles (NVG) before and after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: Nonrandomized, comparative (self-controlled) trial. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen patients (38 eyes) of active-duty US Army Special Forces soldiers. INTERVENTION: PRK for myopia and astigmatism. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity with best optical correction was measured preoperatively and postoperatively (3 months) using acuity charts of various contrast (100%, 10%, 2.5%, 1.25%). Preoperative and postoperative (3 month) uncorrected and best-corrected visual resolutions through NVGs were assessed using a high contrast tribar chart presented at four light levels (3.44 x 10(-3), 1.08 x 10(-3), 1.04 x 10(-4), 1.09 x 10(-5) foot Lamberts) simulating a range of night sky conditions. Subjects were trained before testing. RESULTS: Uncorrected visual acuity at the 3-month postoperative assessment was greater than or equal to 20/20 in 33 of 38 (86.8%) eyes. No eyes lost 2 or more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative best-corrected low-contrast acuity measurements showed no significant differences at all levels of resolution. Preoperative visual resolution through NVGs decreased systematically with decreasing night sky condition. Visual acuities before PRK were reduced without optical correction. Postoperative visual performance with NVGs (without optical correction) equaled or exceeded performance preoperatively with best correction. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective case series provides data on the safety and efficacy of PRK with respect to visual performance under night sky conditions using NVGs. There was no significant loss of visual acuity across a range of contrast levels 3 months postoperatively. There was no change in best-corrected NVG visual resolution postoperatively, whereas uncorrected visual resolution was significantly enhanced compared with preoperative levels. This improvement may translate into better function for soldiers who are unable to or choose not to use optical correction in operational environments.     

Muscular asthenopia and eccentric ablation after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between muscular asthenopia and eccentric ablation after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Sixteen eyes of eight myopic patients whose muscular asthenopia was corrected by subjectively accepted spectacle prism after PRK, with visual acuity better than 0.8, were followed for 6 to 14 months. On the basis of preoperative and post-operative data and corneal topography, we calculated the total corrected corneal power using the Holladay formula and then measured the ablation eccentricity (h, millimeters) and its direction. According to the formula delta approximately equals Dh, the prism effective value (delta) caused by the eccentric ablation was computed and compared with the objectively accepted spectacle prism. RESULTS: The subjectively accepted spectacle prisms were similar to calculated values from the formula. Mean difference was 0.10 +/- 0.25delta. The direction of the subjectively accepted prism was in the direction of the ablation deviation. CONCLUSIONS: Eccentric ablation is an important cause of muscular visual asthenopia after PRK. The asthenopia may be corrected by spectacle prism. The spectacle prism value may be estimated by the formula delta approximately equals Dh.     

Visual outcomes of sterile corneal infiltrates after photorefractive keratectomy

Purpose:Sterile infiltrates following laser refractive surgery is an uncommon complication. This study was undertaken to analyze the visual outcomes of sterile infiltrates following photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).Methods:This retrospective study included 14 eyes that developed sterile infiltrates following PRK out of a total of 6280 eyes that underwent PRK between 2014 and 2017. Medical records of these patients, including patient demographics, characteristics of the infiltrate, presenting visual acuity, and treatment outcomes were recorded and analyzed.Results:The incidence of sterile corneal infiltrates post-PRK in our study was 0.22% (14/6280). The mean age of the patients was 27.42 ± 4.87 years. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) at presentation was 0.49 ± 0.13 log MAR units. The mean size of the infiltrate was 3.22 ± 2.85 mm². All cases were successfully managed medically with topical steroids. The mean UCVA and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the last follow-up visit were 0.08 ± 0.08 and 0.05 ± 0.07 log MAR units, respectively. The mean time taken for resolution of the infiltrate was 8.91 ± 4.57 days.Conclusion:Sterile infiltrates following PRK can be effectively treated with aggressive topical steroids. The outcome is generally favorable and does not require surgical intervention if treatment is instituted early.     

Corneal sensitivity after photorefractive keratectomy.

Corneal anesthesia or hypesthesia can complicate refractive surgical procedures such as epikeratophakia and radial keratotomy. An esthesiometer was used to measure the corneal sensitivity in unoperated-on corneas and fellow corneas after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Decrease in corneal sensitivity was noted within six postoperative weeks, with mean sensitivity being 75.2% +/- 13.3% of normal. Within the first three postoperative months, the patients operated on for correction of compound astigmatism recovered 95.7% +/- 5.3% of the corneal sensitivity, whereas the patients operated on for correction of severe myopia recovered 86.2% +/- 11.2% (P = .07). None of the patients had delayed epithelial healing or recurrent corneal erosions during the time of decreased corneal sensitivity. In otherwise normal myopic eyes, photorefractive keratectomy measurably reduced corneal sensitivity for several postoperative weeks.     

Paraformaldehyde-induced keratitis after photorefractive keratectomy.

We examined three patients who developed keratitis after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. All patients were treated on the same day and in all three cases paraformaldehyde tablets were used for disinfection of the excimer laser iris cone. All patients developed an intense postoperative corneal inflammation that resulted in corneal opacities. In the first patient, the opacities were central and persisted for at least 4 1/2 months postoperatively. He became more myopic than before the operation. His best spectacle-corrected visual acuity worsened by four Snellen lines. In the other two patients, the corneal opacities were paracentral and of less density. Six months postoperatively, these opacities were barely seen. In these two patients the postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity remained unchanged or improved one Snellen line compared to the preoperative level. In all three patients, astigmatism increased postoperatively. These observations suggest that paraformaldehyde tablets are not safe for the disinfection of the excimer laser iris cone.     

Effect of ablation profile on wound healing and visual performance 1 year after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

BACKGROUND: Early photorefractive keratectomy ablations were of limited diameter and depth to maintain the integrity of the globe and to minimise postoperative haze. This study evaluated the effects of deeper, larger diameter wounds on refractive stability and corneal haze, and investigated the effects of ablation profile on wound healing and visual performance. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing -3.00D and -6.00D corrections were randomised to receive 5 mm, 6 mm, or multizone treatments. The multizone treatment was 6 mm in diameter, but only the depth of the 5 mm treatment. Outcome was measured by Snellen visual acuity, residual refractive error, objective techniques for haze and halos, pupil diameter, subjective night vision, and requirement for retreatment. RESULTS: Overall, the results of 6 mm treatments were superior to those of 5 mm and multizone treatments: they had a smaller hyperopic shift (p < 0.01), a more predictable (p < 0.001) and stable refractive outcome, less haze (p < 0.05), smaller halos (p < 0.05), fewer subjective night vision problems, and fewer patients required retreatment. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of these data and a literature review of corneal wound healing demonstrated that the improved outcome associated with the 6 mm beam did not relate to the depth of ablation. The factor with greatest apparent influence on the development of haze and regression was the slope of the wound surface over the entire area of the ablation. Tapering the wound edge provided no additional benefit, and contributed to night vision problems. It is, therefore, recommended that small diameter or multizone treatments should not be used in low and moderate myopia.     

Visual outcomes and quality of life before and after photorefractive keratectomy

Purpose:To compare visual outcomes and vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) between subjects before and after photorefractive keratotomy (PRK) and controls. In addition, VRQoL was compared between subjects at different periods of PRK surgery.Methods:This was a cross-sectional study that included subjects with refractive errors aged 19–40 years and age-matched controls. Subjects were divided into three groups: pre-, post-PRK, and control. Subjects in the post-PRK group were divided into three subgroups (1-week, <6-month, and >6-month follow-up visits). Measurements including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical equivalent (SE) of manifest refraction, and corneal topography were obtained for all participants. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) questionnaire was administered to compare VRQOL between groups and between post-refractive surgery subgroups.Results:A total of 145 participants were included in this study. The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of all participants was 26.29 ± 5.1 years. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) in total QIRC scores between groups. The total QIRC score was better in the post-PRK group than in the pre-PRK and control groups. The scores of items included in the convenience, well-being, and health concern domains were significantly higher in the post-PRK group than in the pre-PRK and control groups. Within the post-PRK group, significant differences (P < 0.001) were found in UCVA and SE between the post-PRK subgroups. Uncorrected VA and SE were better in the post-PRK groups who were followed up in the < 6 and > 6 months subgroups than in the 1-week follow-up subgroup (P < 0.0001).Conclusion:A significant improvement in visual outcomes and VRQoL occurred after PRK surgery. Subjects enjoyed their VRQoL after refractive surgery.     

Contact lens fitting after photorefractive keratectomy.

AIMS/BACKGROUND: This study evaluated contact lens fitting and the longer term response of the photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) cornea to lens wear. In PRK for myopia problems such as regression, anterior stromal haze, irregular astigmatism, halo aberration, and anisometropia have been reported. Certain patients therefore require contact lens correction to obtain best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). METHOD: From an original cohort of 80 patients, 15 were dissatisfied with their visual outcome 6 months after PRK. Ten of these were fitted with lenses and monitored regularly. RESULTS: The best fit rigid gas permeable lens of diameter 9.20-10.00 mm was generally 0.10 mm steeper than mean keratometry readings. Because of lid discomfort five patients were refitted with daily wear soft lenses. All 10 achieved satisfactory lens wear of 10 hours per day. Central corneal steepening of 0.75 D (0.15 mm) occurred in one patient. Two patients had slight central corneal flattening. Three patients discontinued lens wear as they found lens care a nuisance. Four finally opted for retreatment by PRK. CONCLUSIONS: In most cases, contact lenses gave good visual acuity and, in cases of mild irregular astigmatism, a significant improvement over spectacle BCVA. No significant adverse reaction to contact lens wear was found. Although ocular tolerance of lenses was satisfactory, several patients discontinued lens wear or sought improved unaided vision.     

准分子激光角膜切削术后的屈光回退

目的通过准分子激光角膜切削术（ｐｈｏｔｏｒｅｆｒａｃｔｉｖｅｋｅｒａｔｅｃｔｏｍｙ,ＰＲＫ）术后屈光回退的分析,以期探讨可能影响回退的因素。方法经ＰＲＫ手术治疗近视于术后发生回退（≥－１．００Ｄ）１０３只眼,术前屈光度－４．００～－１４．５０Ｄ（－８．７５±２．６５Ｄ）。分为二组进行比较,Ⅰ组为中度近视（－４．００～－７．９０Ｄ）,Ⅱ组为高度近视（≥－８．００Ｄ）。结果中度近视回退率１．１７％,高度近视回退率６．９３％（Ｐ＜０．００１）。高年龄组回退率较低年龄组高（Ｐ＜０．０１）。较严重的角膜上皮下雾状混浊（ｈａｚｅ）多与回退伴行。因激素性高眼压减少或停止局部糖皮质激素的应用可导致回退,屈光的稳定性与性别无关,回退常伴Ｋ值增大。结论回退与预期矫正度、年龄以及ｈａｚｅ有明显相关     

Corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy

Background Corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) has only been occasionally reported, and its incidence has not been assessed. Methods In a retrospective, non-comparative case series, incidence of corneal ectasia was evaluated in a personal consecutive 6453-case series of myopic PRK with a minimum follow-up of 18 months. Features and prognosis were evaluated in all patients with ectasia after PRK (in both personal and referred cases). Results Ectasia was detected in three eyes of two patients (patients 1 and 2) 3 years and 1 year after PRK performed elsewhere. In addition, in the personal PRK series, two eyes of two patients (patients 3 and 4) developed corneal ectasia 5 months after surgery (incidence: 0.03%). Pre-operatively, forme fruste keratoconus was present in patients 1, 3 and 4; keratoconus in the fellow eye in patient 2; pachymetry <500 micron in patients 2 and 3. In patient 1, rigid contact lenses were prescribed, and in patient 2 deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty was needed; in patients 3 and 4, low induced astigmatism resulted, requiring driving spectacles in patient 3. Conclusions PRK induced corneal ectasia in predisposed eyes, even after low myopic ablations. Forme fruste keratoconus and keratoconus in the fellow eye were the main pre-operative findings. Prognosis varies according to severity. The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any product or technique mentioned. The author has full control of all primary data, and agrees to allow Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review the data upon request.     

Corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy

Two patients developed corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Case 1 had evidence of early keratoconus preoperatively, with manifest refractions of -4.00 +2.50 x 160 (20/20) in the right eye and -7.00 +3.00 x 180 (20/30) in the left eye; thin corneas (472 microm and 441 microm, respectively); and inferior paracentral steepening in the right eye and central steepening in the left eye on topography. Case 2 had manifest refractions of -8.50 +3.75 x 123 (20/20(-2)) in the right eye and -9.25 +4.00 x 077 (20/20(-1)) in the left eye; corneal thickness of 509 microm and 508 microm, respectively; and symmetric bow-tie patterns in both eyes on topography. Case 2 had a family history suspicious for keratoconus, with a sibling who had bilateral corneal transplantation at a young age. Both patients developed bilateral corneal ectasia after PRK.     

Bilateral keratectasia after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features, management, and outcome of a patient who developed bilateral ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: Case report of a 35-year-old man who underwent bilateral PRK. Preoperative uncorrected visual acuity was 20/200 in the right eye and 20/100 in the left eye. The patient's history was unremarkable and he denied a family history of ocular disorders. RESULTS: Two weeks after surgery, the patient presented with loss of visual acuity in both eyes. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/80 in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye. Objective refraction could not be obtained. Slit-lamp microscopy showed corneal thinning in both eyes. After examining the patient's family, his sister was found to have clinical and topographic keratoconus. CONCLUSIONS: Ectasia is a rare complication of PRK. We report the occurrence of bilateral ectasia after PRK in a patient with asymmetric bowtie topographies. We recommend that refractive surgery, even surface techniques such as PRK, be avoided in patients with a family history of keratoconus.     

Frequency-doubling perimetry after photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on frequency-doubling perimetry (FDP) patterns in myopic patients without glaucoma. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy. METHODS: Sixteen myopic patients (16 eyes) with a spherical equivalent worse than -7.0 diopters were enrolled. The fellow eyes were used as controls. All patients had PRK for myopia. Using FDP, the mean defect (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD) were evaluated preoperatively and 2 weeks and 3 and 6 months after PRK. At the same examinations, the effect of the reprofiled cornea on the visual field was studied; the cornea was divided into 4 concentric zones (central, paracentral, lateral, and peripheral) and each median zone contrast sensitivity (MZCS) evaluated. RESULTS: There was no difference in PSD and MZCS between treated eyes and controls in any zone at any time (P >.05). Longitudinally, there was no variation in any perimetry zone (P >.05). In treated eyes, there was a significant relationship among ablation depth, MD, and MZCS in all zones until 2 weeks after laser surgery (P <.02). CONCLUSIONS: Frequency-doubling perimetry did not appear to be affected by corneal changes induced by PRK and can therefore be safely used in the early diagnosis of glaucoma.