Diagnostic reference levels and effective dose in paediatric cardiac catheterization

European states within the EEC are required to establish and use diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in X-ray examinations. However, up to now there have been no DRLs for cardiac catheterization in children, nor as a rule is the effective dose estimated. We have evaluated the dose-area products (DAPs) for three different types of angiocardiography systems over a time span of 8 years. For each system DAP increased in proportion to the body weight (BW) over two orders of magnitude. The proportionality constant decreased over the years. To reduce the broad distribution of DAP the doses for cine acquisition (DAPA) and fluoroscopy (DAPF) were indexed with respect to the total numbers of acquired images (AN) and the total times of fluoroscopy (FT). DAPA/AN is directly proportional to BW with a high correlation (r = 0.896, n = 1346). Likewise, DAPF/FT is proportional to BW from 0.1 kg to 100 kg (r = 0.84, n = 2138). Therefore, by normalizing DAP to BW the growth dependent variation of DAP can be eliminated. There are numerous short examinations with very small total DAPs, which were separated from the group of diagnostic examinations. The mean DAP/BW of this group is 0.41 Gycm2 kg(-1) (90th percentile: 0.81 Gycm2 kg(-1), n = 1106). For interventional procedures in congenital heart diseases DAP/BW is significantly higher (p<0.001) (mean: 0.56 Gycm2 kg(-1), 90th percentile: 1.16 Gycm2 kg(-1), n = 883). There are significant differences between different types of interventional procedures, the mean values being between 0.35 Gycm2 kg(-1) (occlusion of patent ductus botalli, n = 165) and 1.30 Gycm2 kg(-1) (occlusion of ventricular septal defect, n = 32). For patients who are catheterized several times over the years, the cumulative effective dose (E) may reach high values, being especially high for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (typically 11 mSv). E is derived from DAP/BW by use of a constant DAP/BW to E conversion factor, independent of the age of the patient. DAP/BW is appropriate to describe paediatric DRLs and is recommended instead of using mean DAP values for age groups.     

Diagnostic reference levels in plain radiography for paediatric imaging: A Portuguese study

ObjectiveTo determine diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for the most frequent paediatric plain radiography examinations in Portugal (chest, pelvis and abdomen) and to characterise a standard paediatric patient for each age group used in literature.MethodsAnthropometric data was collected from 9935 patients. Each age group (<1, 1–<5, 5–<10, 10–<16, ≥16) was categorised by the median values of weight, height and BMI, to define a standard patient. Exposure parameters, kerma-area product (KAP-mGy cm²) and entrance surface air kerma (ESAK-μGy) were collected. DRLs for KAP and ESAK were defined as the 75th percentile (P75) of dose values and presented by age and weight.ResultsIn each age group the P75 of KAP varied from 11 to 77 mGy cm² for chest; 23–816 mGy cm² for pelvis; 25–979 mGy cm² for abdomen. The P75 of ESAK varied from 49 to 67 μGy for chest; 98–1129 μGy for pelvis and 70–1060 μGy for abdomen.ConclusionThe P75 of dose values determined in this study were lower than those published in literature. When available, weight is the preferred parameter to categorise paediatric patients. The large ranges of dose values found in this study, demonstrates a clear need for the optimisation and harmonisation of practice.     

Clinical indication-based diagnostic reference levels for paediatric head computed tomography examinations in Kano Metropolis,northwestern Nigeria

IntroductionPaediatric patients are recognised to be at higher risk of developing radiation-induced cancer than adults because of rapidly growing organs and tissues which are vulnerable to cellular damage. The aim of the study was to determine indication based Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL_CI) for paediatric head computed tomography (CT) examinations within Kano metropolis, Nigeria.MethodsCT dose index (CTDI_vol), dose length product (DLP) and other scan parameters were recorded for 113 paediatric undergoing CT head examinations. Different clinical indications were recorded and categorised in addition to patient age. Third quartile values (75th percentile) of the median dose were considered as DRL_CI. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences between DRL_CI, for different age groups, and variations among institutions. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23.0 was used for analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.ResultsDRL_CI for Hydrocephalus for <5 years and 5–10 years was 28.10 mGy and 28.11 mGy with DLP of 1623.20 mGy cm and 1623.21 mGy cm, respectively. The 11–15 year group recorded 29.10 mGy and 1625.20 mGy cm. Indications of haemorrhage/trauma and post-seizure imaging all had same values for <5 years and 5–10 years (28.10 mGy and 1623.20 mGy cm) while the 11 to 15-year group recorded 39.60 mGy and 1626 mGy cm. Intracranial Space Occupying lesion had the same DRL_CI value for < 5years and 5–10 years (29.0 mGy and 1600 mGy cm, respectively) the 11 to 15-year group recorded values of 46.20 mGy and 1663.4 mGy cm. There was no statistically significant difference between DRL_CI for <5 years and 5 to 10-year age groups (p = 0.199), while different centres showed some statistically significant relationships (p = 0.02).ConclusionThe study noted dose differences between age groups less than 10 years and above ten years, there were some statistically significant relationship with DRL_CI. Dose optimisation techniques for paediatric examinations together with selection of the right protocol for paediatric head CT are necessary.Implications for practiceThe study has provided DRL_CI for paediatric head CT examinations. These values can be used for future comparisons and as a potential dose optimisation tool. Such data can also guide radiographers when selecting appropriate parameters for indication-based CT examination to help achieve a low dose with acceptable image quality.     

Reference dose levels for patients undergoing common diagnostic X-ray examinations in Irish hospitals

Wide variations in patient dose for the same type of X-ray examination have been evident from various international dose surveys. Reference dose levels provide a framework to reduce this variability and aid in the optimization of radiation protection. The aim of this study was to establish, for the first time, a baseline for national reference dose levels in Ireland for four of the most common X-ray examinations: chest, abdomen, pelvis and lumbar spine. Measurements of entrance surface dose using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) for these four X-ray examinations were performed on 10 patients in each of 16 randomly selected hospitals. This represented 42% of Irish hospitals applicable to this study. Results have shown wide variation of mean hospital doses, from a factor of 3 for an anteroposterior lumbar spine to a factor of 23 for the chest X-ray. The difference between maximum and minimum individual patient dose values varied up to a factor of 75. Reasons for these dose variations were complex but, in general, low tube potential, high mAs and low filtration were associated with high-dose hospitals. This study also demonstrated lower reference dose levels of up to 40% when compared with those established by the UK and the Commission of the European Communities for four out of six projections. Only the chest X-ray exhibited a similar reference level to those established elsewhere. This emphasizes the importance of each country establishing its own reference dose levels that are appropriate to their own radiographic techniques and practices in order to optimize patient protection.     

The establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for paediatric interventional cardiology

BackgroundThere is a paucity of information worldwide on radiation exposure in paediatric interventional cardiology. At present Nationally established Diagnostic Reference Levels exist for adult interventional cardiology procedures in the UK but little data is available for paediatrics. In addition, interventional cardiology has been identified as one the highest contributors to medical exposure to ionising radiation and children are more radiosensitive than adults.ObjectiveThis study sought to determine current radiation dose levels in paediatric interventional cardiology (IC) with a view to establishing local diagnostic reference levels (LDRL).MethodsRadiation dose and examination details were recorded for 354 paediatric patients examined by IC in a specialised paediatric centre in Europe. Radiation doses were recorded using a Dose Area Product meter along with examination details. Procedures were categorised as either diagnostic (A) or therapeutic (B). Data was further sub-divided into five age ranges; (1) newborn <1 year (2) 1 <5 years (3) 5 <10 years (4) 10 <15 years (5) 15 years and over. Proposed LDRL were calculated from the mean dose area product readings.ResultsThe mean patient age was 2.6 years (range 0.0 days–16 years) and weight was 14.9 kg (range 2.4–112 kg). LDRL for the five age groupings were calculated as 190, 421, 582, 1289 and 1776 cGycm² respectively.ConclusionLocal dose reference levels have been proposed for paediatric IC and can be used as a benchmark for other hospitals to compare against their own radiation doses.     

A study of the application of paediatric reference levels

Radiation exposure of paediatrics is of particular concern because of the greater health detriment. In this study, the application of patient dose reference levels to paediatric radiographic examinations has been investigated. The relationships between entrance surface dose and patient age and size parameters have been studied in three hospitals. The data have been used to derive conversion factors to describe relationships between doses for children of different ages. The usefulness of equivalent patient diameter, weight and age as variables relating to doses has been examined. Simple conversion factors in look-up tables have been derived that link doses for patients of a variety of ages and sizes for particular examinations. It is proposed that factors of this type could be applied to data for individual patients to allow a wider range of ages to be included in any group. This would enable sufficient dose data to be collected from non-specialist hospitals for comparison with reference levels. It would facilitate identification of hospitals where doses are higher so that changes could be made to radiographic practice.     

Paediatric diagnostic reference levels for common radiological examinations using the European guidelines

Objective:The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility to determine regional diagnostic reference levels (RDRLs) for paediatric conventional and CT examinations using the European guidelines and to compare RDRLs derived from weight and age groups, respectively.Methods:Data were collected from 31 hospitals in 4 countries, for 7 examination types for a total of 2978 patients. RDRLs were derived for each weight and age group, respectively, when the total number of patients exceeded 15.Results:It was possible to derive RDRLs for most, but not all, weight-based and age-based groups for the seven examinations. The result using weight-based and age-based groups differed substantially. The RDRLs were lower than or equal to the European and recently published national DRLs.Conclusion:It is feasible to derive RDRLs. However, a thorough review of the clinical indications and methodologies has to be performed previous to data collection. This study does not support the notion that DRLs derived using age and weight groups are exchangeable.Advances in knowledge:Paediatric DRLs should be derived using weight-based groups with access to the actual weight of the patients. DRLs developed using weight differ markedly from those developed with the use of age. There is still a need to harmonize the method to derive solid DRLs for paediatric radiological examinations.     

Enhanced yield of chromosome aberrations after CT examinations in paediatric patients

PURPOSE: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) could enhance the chromosome aberration yields in paediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Blood samples were taken before and after CT scans from 10 children for whom the medical justifications for CT examinations were accidental injuries and not diseases as investigated in earlier studies. Chromosome analysis was carried out in lymphocytes by fluorescence plus Giemsa (FPG) staining exclusively in metaphases of the first cell cycle in vitro. RESULTS: The mean blood dose of the 10 children was about 12.9 mGy which was determined by a newly developed dose estimation. Based on more than 20,000 analyzed cells it was found that after CT examination the frequencies of dicentrics (dic) and excess acentric fragments (ace) in lymphocytes were significantly increased. By subdividing the children into two age groups, those with an age from 0.4 years to 9 years and from 10 - 15 years, it became obvious that the observed increase in chromosome aberrations was mainly contributed by the younger age group. In this group the frequency of dicentrics was significantly increased whereas in the older group the observed increase was not significant. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that CT examinations enhance the dicentrics yields in peripheral lymphocytes of children aged up to 15 years. Since in particular significantly increased dicentric yields could be observed in children with an age from 0.4 - 9 years, it can be assumed that children younger than 10 years may be more radiation sensitive than older subjects.     

Enhanced yield of chromosome aberrations after CT examinations in paediatric patients

Purpose: To determine whether computed tomography (CT) could enhance the chromosome aberration yields in paediatric patients.

Material and methods: Blood samples were taken before and after CT scans from 10 children for whom the medical justifications for CT examinations were accidental injuries and not diseases as investigated in earlier studies. Chromosome analysis was carried out in lymphocytes by fluorescence plus Giemsa (FPG) staining exclusively in metaphases of the first cell cycle in vitro.

Results: The mean blood dose of the 10 children was about 12.9 mGy which was determined by a newly developed dose estimation. Based on more than 20,000 analyzed cells it was found that after CT examination the frequencies of dicentrics (dic) and excess acentric fragments (ace) in lymphocytes were significantly increased. By subdividing the children into two age groups, those with an age from 0.4 years to 9 years and from 10 – 15 years, it became obvious that the observed increase in chromosome aberrations was mainly contributed by the younger age group. In this group the frequency of dicentrics was significantly increased whereas in the older group the observed increase was not significant.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that CT examinations enhance the dicentrics yields in peripheral lymphocytes of children aged up to 15 years. Since in particular significantly increased dicentric yields could be observed in children with an age from 0.4 – 9 years, it can be assumed that children younger than 10 years may be more radiation sensitive than older subjects.     

National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK

The National Patient Dose Database (NPDD) is maintained by the Radiation Protection Division of the Health Protection Agency. The latest review of the database analysed the data collected from 316 hospitals over a 5-year period to the end of 2005. The information supplied amounted to a total of 23 000 entrance surface dose measurements and 57 000 dose-area product measurements for single radiographs, and 208 000 dose-area product measurements along with 187 000 fluoroscopy times for diagnostic examinations or interventional procedures. In addition, patient dose data for dental X-ray examinations were included for the first time in the series of 5-yearly reviews. This article presents a summary of a key output from the NPDD - national reference doses. These are based on the third quartile values of the dose distributions for 30 types of diagnostic X-ray examination and 8 types of interventional procedure on adults, and for 4 types of X-ray examination on children. The reference doses are approximately 16% lower than the corresponding values in the previous (2000) review, and are typically less than half the values of the original UK national reference doses that were derived from a survey in the mid-1980s. This commentary suggests that two of the national reference doses from the 2000 review be retained as diagnostic reference levels because the older sample size was larger than for the 2005 review. No clear evidence could be found for the use of digital imaging equipment having a significant effect on dose.     

Diagnostic reference levels in pediatric radiology in Austria

Background  

Because of the higher sensitivity to radiation in children, optimization plays an essential role in pediatric radiology. Diagnostic reference levels are a helpful tool to optimize patient dose for standard radiographic procedures.     

欧洲儿童CT成像的诊断参考水平

欧盟委员会（EC）发布了最新《欧洲儿童成像诊断参考水平指南》（辐射防护第185号）。该指南详细介绍了建立欧洲儿童成像诊断参考水平（DRL）的背景、目的、方法和用法,涵盖X射线摄影、透视、CT及介入放射学（IR）方面。回顾性分析了现有欧洲儿童国家级DRL（NDRL）的现状、优势和局限性,在现有辐射剂量数据资源的基础上,达成了一些共识,出台了欧洲儿童的DRL（EDRL）,为欧洲儿童的辐射防护优化提供了最新的指导意见。对于国内放射从业人员了解相关知识具有积极的借鉴意义。     

Diagnostic reference levels in the X–ray department

This article reviews developments in Europe over the past 10 years in the radiation protection of patients undergoing medical X-ray examinations that led to the requirement in the EC Medical Exposure Directive of 1997 that all Member States should establish Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs). The purpose of DRLs is explained and methods for deriving national DRLs that comply with the requirements of the Directive are described. Suitable patient dose quantities are defined and dose measurement methods and patient sampling techniques that can be used both by the appropriate authorities for setting national DRLs, and by individual X-ray departments for checking compliance with them, are discussed. Finally, the progress made over the past 5 years in translating the requirements of the Directive into national legislation, including the provision of guidance on the use of DRLs for X-ray departments, is reviewed. It relies heavily on the author’s experience of how these matters are progressing in the UK, but will hopefully be of some practical help to the staff in X-ray departments from all over Europe.     

Doses to patients from routine diagnostic X-ray examinations in England

A collaborative survey between the National Radiological Protection Board and the Hospital Physicists' Association has been conducted to ascertain current levels of exposure for patients undergoing 10 routine types of X-ray examination in England. The main part of this study consisted of measurements on nearly 3200 patients attending 20 randomly selected English hospitals. The energy imparted to each patient was determined from a measurement of the total exposure-area product for the examination. In addition, thermoluminescent dosemeters were attached to the patient's skin to enable the derivation of doses to the major radiosensitive organs, either directly or using appropriate conversion factors calculated for a mathematical phantom by a Monte Carlo technique. Histograms are presented showing the wide distributions often observed in the doses for each type of examination. Mean values of exposure-area product, energy imparted to the patient, entrance skin dose per film and organ dose are reported, together with coefficients of variation. Comparison of the results with those from similar surveys in the UK and abroad is complicated by inconsistencies in the reporting of such data, but substantial differences are sometimes apparent, particularly for the estimates of organ doses. The present measurements will provide a useful baseline for future measurements and will be used to evaluate the collective dose to the population from medical exposures and the radiation risks from the various radiological procedures.     

Radiation doses for barium enema and barium meal examinations in Ireland: potential diagnostic reference levels

Wide variations in patient dose for the same examinations have been demonstrated by several studies throughout Europe. By investigating patient dose, variations can be acknowledged, causal agents sought and the necessary adjustments made. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) provide a framework with which dose levels from individual hospitals are compared, and when exceeded, corrective actions can be taken where appropriate. This study aimed to establish DRLs for barium enema and barium meal examinations in Ireland. Measurements were recorded using a dose-area product meter in 12 hospitals representing 33% of relevant hospitals. Results demonstrated wide mean hospital dose variation, by up to a factor of 7.8 and 4.2 for barium enema and barium meal examinations, respectively. Minimum and maximum individual patient dose values varied by a factor of 45 for barium enemas and 90 for barium meal examinations. Reasons for dose variations were complex, but major factors for both examinations were fluoroscopy time, secondary radiation grid type and level of filtration. Some examination-specific factors were also noted. DRLs, established using the quantity dose-area product, were calculated to be 47 Gy cm(2) for barium enemas and 17 Gy cm(2) for barium meal examinations. Although the DRL value for barium meals was the same as the reference value established in the UK for that examination in 1996, the barium enema DRL in this study was 45% higher than the relevant UK value.     

Application of European Commission reference dose levels in CT examinations in Crete, Greece

The purpose of this study was to apply European Commission reference dose levels (EC RDLs) to routine CT examinations. The dosimetric quantities proposed in the European Guidelines (EG) for CT are weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDI(w)) for a single slice and dose-length product (DLP) for a complete examination. Patient-related data as well as technical parameters for brain, chest, abdomen and pelvis examinations were collected for four CT scanners in the Euromedica Medical Center. Computed tomography dose index (CTDI) measurements were performed on each scanner and CTDI(w), DLP and effective dose E were estimated for each type of examination for a random sample of 10 typical patients. Mean values of CTDI(w) had a range of 27.0-52.0 mGy for brain and 13.9-26.9 mGy for chest, abdomen and pelvis examinations. Mean values of DLP had a range of 430-758 mGy cm for brain, 348-807 mGy cm for chest, 278-582 mGy cm for abdomen and 306-592 mGy cm for pelvis examinations. Mean values of E were 1.4 mSv for brain, 10.9 mSv for chest, 7.1 mSv for abdomen and 9.3 mSv for pelvis examinations. Results confirm that the Euromedica Medical Center meets EC RDLs for brain, abdomen and pelvis examinations, in terms of radiation dose and examination technique. As far as chest examination is concerned, although CTDI(w) of each scanner is within proposed values, the DLP is consistently exceeded, probably because of the large irradiation volume length L. It is anticipated that a reduction of L, or product mAs, or their combination, will reduce DLP without affecting image quality.