Breast cancer adjuvant endocrine therapy

Adjuvant endocrine therapy with the selective estrogen receptor modulator, tamoxifen, has significantly improved mortality from early-stage breast cancer for both pre- and postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Recent large clinical trials have demonstrated a clear and consistent benefit for the incorporation of aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy within adjuvant endocrine regimens for postmenopausal women. The AIs, which are associated with myalgias, arthralgias, and a reduction in bone mineral density, are generally well tolerated and have lower risks of endometrial carcinoma and thromboembolic events than tamoxifen. Data are awaited from ongoing trials to better define the optimal sequencing strategy, duration, and AI agent. Attempts to further optimize adjuvant endocrine therapy by identifying predictive biomarkers of response, as well as by developing strategies to overcome endocrine resistance are underway. In premenopausal women AI monotherapy is currently contraindicated and tamoxifen remains the standard of care. The role of ovarian function suppression in addition to tamoxifen or combined with AI therapy is being explored. The hope is that continued advances in endocrine therapy will translate into improved survival among both pre- and postmenopausal women with receptor-positive breast cancer.     

Effects of third-generation aromatase inhibitors on bone

Low oestradiol levels in women are associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased fracture risk. The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs; anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) are used in the treatment of early and advanced breast cancer and act by substantially reducing oestrogen synthesis in postmenopausal women. However, due to their mechanism of action, there is concern regarding the long-term effects of these agents on bone, particularly when used in the adjuvant setting. In this paper, the currently available data on the effects of the third-generation AIs on markers of bone turnover, BMD, and fracture risk are reviewed, with the emphasis on results in the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer. These data suggest that both the steroidal (exemestane) and non-steroidal (anastrozole and letrozole) AIs appear to affect bone turnover. Conclusions regarding any clinically relevant differences between these agents are difficult to make, and further data are awaited from long-term adjuvant use of these three agents in ongoing clinical studies. Postmenopausal women are at increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture, and the increasing use of AIs in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients will require appropriate consideration of fracture risk, with the use of anti-osteoporotic therapies, if necessary.     

The aromatase inhibitors (plus ovarian function suppression) in premenopausal breast cancer patients: Ready for prime time?

Tamoxifen alone or the combination of ovarian function suppression (OFS) and tamoxifen are the mainstay of hormonal therapy in premenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer. The results of large trials conducted with the third generation of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, indicated better outcomes among postmenopausal breast cancer patients with endocrine responsive disease given AIs than among those given tamoxifen. These results supported the investigation of AIs in combination with OFS in premenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. In this article we reviewed the efficacy and toxicity data on the use of AIs combined with OFS in premenopausal breast cancer patients in metastatic, neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting.     

Recent perspectives of endocrine therapy for breast cancer

The choice of endocrine therapy for breast cancer depends on the menopausal status and stage of disease. Endocrine therapy remains the first choice and most important component in the treatment of hormone sensitive non-life threatening advanced breast cancer. In premenopausal women with metastatic disease, the combination of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist plus tamoxifen is reasonable as first-line endocrine therapy. In postmenopausal patients with recurrent disease progressing after or during adjuvant tamoxifen, third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the preferred first-line endocrine treatment. Many premenopausal and postmenopausal women with hormone responsive breast cancer benefit from sequential use of endocrine therapies at the time of disease progression. Recent clinical trials designs have been implemented, employing AIs as monotherapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients, as first-line adjuvant therapy, and in sequence either 2-3 or 5 years, with initial tamoxifen. Emerging results from these trials indicate an advantage to patients for any of these strategies, and most international guidelines now suggest the use of an AI in the adjuvant setting in postmenopausal women. The use of endocrine treatment for metastatic and early breast cancer will be reviewed here.     

Adjuvant therapy of breast cancer

The treatment of early-stage breast cancer includes the use of chemotherapeutic and hormonal agents. Both chemotherapy and hormonal therapy have been shown by large, randomized trials to offer a survival advantage. The most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents used in the United States are doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). However, 3 studies have suggested that there may be an advantage in the use of taxanes in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Furthermore the use of dose dense chemotherapy, incorporating AC and paclitaxel, has shown very promising results. It is well established that tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), improves overall survival (OS) in women with hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer. However, the results from large multicenter, randomized trials, suggest the potential superiority of aromatase inhibitors, compared to tamoxifen or an advantage of sequencing tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor (AI). The role of ovarian suppression is still being investigated in patients who have received prior chemotherapy. Newer agents, such as the monoclonal antibody against the HER2/neu receptor, trastuzumab, are now being studied as adjuvant therapy in early-stage breast cancer. In the next few years, with the completion of several large randomized trials, we will be able to answer several questions, including the optimal way of incorporating AIs into adjuvant therapy, the long-term sequella of using trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer and the role of ovarian suppression combined with an aromatse inhibitor in premenopausal women with breast cancer.     

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer

Endocrine therapy is a critical part of adjuvant therapy in women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, and has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence and death from breast cancer. For decades, 5 years of tamoxifen has been the standard treatment. For premenopausal women, it remains so, and we await the results of ongoing trials to define the role of ovarian suppression or ablation with endocrine therapy. If a woman becomes postmenopausal during treatment, consideration should be given to extended adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) for another 5 years. In postmenopausal women, trials have shown that AIs are more beneficial than tamoxifen in preventing disease recurrence.They have been compared as upfront treatment for 5 years, as sequential therapy after 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen, and as extended treatment for 5 years after 5 years of tamoxifen. Among the questions still being studied are the optimal duration of extended adjuvant therapy with AIs, how one AI performs compared to another, and whether there is a benefit to intermittent extended adjuvant treatment.     

Controversies in adjuvant endocrine treatment of premenopausal women

For patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, some form of endocrine therapy is central to the management of their disease. For premenopausal patients in whom estrogen synthesis occurs primarily in the ovaries, current treatment options include ovarian ablation or suppression and selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen and toremifene. Ovarian ablation and tamoxifen have demonstrated their effectiveness in the adjuvant setting, reducing the risk of recurrence and death. However, although some studies suggest ovarian ablation results in an equivalent outcome to chemotherapy alone, studies examining the combination have not demonstrated a clear benefit with the addition of ovarian suppression to standard chemotherapy. Results from trials combining ovarian suppression with tamoxifen have also been inconclusive. Finally, although aromatase inhibitors cannot be used as monotherapy in premenopausal patients, the reduction in the risk of recurrence observed with the integration of these agents into adjuvant regimens in postmenopausal patients when compared with the standard 5 years of tamoxifen has stimulated interest in evaluating the combination of ovarian suppression with an aromatase inhibitor in premenopausal women. Several ongoing trials will investigate these combinations as well as ovarian suppression plus tamoxifen.     

Adjuvant hormonal therapy in peri- and postmenopausal breast cancer

Tamoxifen has been the mainstay of endocrine treatment for early-stage breast cancer in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women for many years. Since 2001, the results of several large, randomized, clinical trials have provided evidence that aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy, either upfront or in sequence after tamoxifen, improves disease-free survival and, in certain patients, overall survival for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Thus far, with relatively short-term follow-up, AIs have been generally safe and well tolerated among the population of patients treated in these adjuvant trials. However, important side effects such as musculoskeletal and bone-related problems, including the risk for osteoporosis and fractures, remain of concern and warrant continued monitoring and follow-up. Several questions regarding the appropriate AI to use and the timing of AI therapy remain unresolved, and ongoing studies will help address these issues. Caution is warranted in the use of AIs in perimenopausal women, including those that develop chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea, and clinical evidence supports the role for AI use in postmenopausal women only. Areas of active investigation include the mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy with tamoxifen and AIs and clinical strategies to overcome this resistance.     

Aromatase inhibitor plus ovarian suppression as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal women with breast cancer

The goal of adjuvant hormonal therapy for breast cancer is to prevent recurrence by eradicating micrometastatic disease. Recent studies have shown that the use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as adjuvant therapy improves outcomes for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer compared to adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen alone. The research question has been raised whether AIs would have similar improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) in premenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer. Combining 2 phase 3 clinical trials (n = 4,690), Pagani and colleagues randomized premenopausal women with ER-positive early breast cancer to exemestane plus ovarian suppression or tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression for a period of 5 y. After a median follow-up of 68 months, DFS was 91.1% in the AI group and 87.3% in the tamoxifen group. In premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive early breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with exemestane plus ovarian suppression, as compared with tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression, significantly reduced recurrence.     

Osteopenia and osteoporosis in women with breast cancer

Osteopenia and osteoporosis are prevalent in women. Epidemiologic studies show that the risk of breast cancer is greater in postmenopausal women with higher bone mineral density (BMD). Standard treatments for breast cancer such as adjuvant chemotherapy or hormonal therapy can increase bone loss, and hence may increase the risk of osteoporosis. Premenopausal women treated with standard adjuvant chemotherapy frequently develop permanent ovarian failure, or early menopause. Ovarian failure is associated with accelerated bone loss, and bisphosphonates may mitigate this bone loss in women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Tamoxifen preserves BMD in postmenopausal women; however, in premenopausal women tamoxifen may increase bone loss. Anastrazole, an aromatase inhibitor, is approved for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. With a follow-up duration of less than 5 years, anastrazole-treated women experience increased fractures relative to those treated with tamoxifen. The management of osteopenia and osteoporosis in women with breast cancer generally does not differ from women without breast cancer. Adequate dietary calcium and vitamin D intake, encouraging weight-bearing exercise, and counseling about the relationship between smoking and alcohol and bone loss are all prudent recommendations for overall health and may lessen bone loss and the risk of subsequent osteoporosis. BMD should be measured in women with chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, and in those on aromatase inhibitors. Bisphosphonates reduce the bone loss associated with chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, and clinical trials evaluating third-generation bisphosphonates in women with chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure are underway. As many women with breast cancer will be long-term survivors, increasing recognition of maintaining skeletal health is important.     

Emerging data on optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy: Breast International Group trial 1-98/MA.17

In recent years, several major trials have studied aromatase inhibitors (AIs)/inactivators as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. The AIs have demonstrated improved efficacy compared with 5 years of tamoxifen when used as initial therapy or when used sequentially after 2-3 years. They also improve outcomes when used after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen in this patient population. In all cases, AIs improve disease-free survival compared with the standard 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, leading to a reassessment of the optimal adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. The American Society of Clinical Oncology now recommends the inclusion of an AI into the adjuvant regimen at some point for most postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer. However, the optimal duration of AI therapy and the comparative efficacy and safety of the alternative strategies for their incorporation remain matters of debate. In addition, the long-term impact of AIs on other organs, such as the bone and cardiovascular systems, is not completely understood, and longer follow-up of patients from these original trials as well as carefully planned future trials with appropriate substudies are essential to determine the optimal endocrine treatment strategy.     

Perte osseuse liée aux hormonomodulateurs

The use of hormonal deprivation therapy in the management of breast and prostate cancers is associated with an increased risk of fracture and accelerated bone loss. In women with breast cancer, large adjuvant trials showed that all third-generation AIs (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) have been associated with an increased risk of fractures and bone loss. The hypogonadism induced by GnRH agonists increases the risk of osteoporosis; the risk of fracture was shown to be correlated with the duration of therapy and bone loss is maximal in the first year after initiation of the treatment and increases with time. The measurement of bone mineral density is necessary before initiating any hormonal deprivation therapy. The use of bisphosphonates in patients with osteoporosis (defined by a T-score <- ?2.5) and or fracture is useful to prevent bone loss.     

Bone health in women with early-stage breast cancer

Bone health is an increasingly important concern in breast cancer survivors because in postmenopausal women, bone-sparing tamoxifen is being replaced by aromatase inhibitors, whereas in premenopausal women, ovarian suppression is playing an increasing role in adjuvant management. Estrogen reduction resulting from aromatase inhibition and ovarian suppression are associated with loss in bone mineral density (BMD) and an increase in fracture risk. These side effects must be placed in context of the overall risks and benefits seen with these interventions. The American Society of Clinical Oncology has outlined a management strategy for bone health maintenance in breast cancer survivors with early-stage disease that incorporates baseline and ongoing screening for BMD and treatment based on BMD results. Limited but consistent data suggest bisphosphonate therapy represents a treatment option for this condition. A variety of interventions to maintain bone health in breast cancer survivors are undergoing clinical evaluation and include the oral bisphosphonates risedronate and clodronate, the intravenous bisphosphonate zoledronic acid, the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand inhibitor AMG-162, and the hormonal agent tibolone. Current information suggests bone loss associated with estrogen reduction in breast cancer survivors may represent a preventable and treatable condition. Ongoing clinical trials will definitively evaluate this hypothesis.     

Aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with early stage breast cancer

Endocrine therapy of hormone receptor-positive breast tumors is widely used as palliative therapy for metastatic breast cancer and as adjuvant therapy for early stage breast cancer. Tamoxifen has been the definitive standard of hormonal therapies for the last 30 years because of its documented efficacy and reasonable safety profile. Based on encouraging results from trials utilizing the selective, third generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in metastatic breast cancer, a number of trials were designed to examine these agents as adjuvant therapies. Trials directly comparing AIs with tamoxifen have, to date, demonstrated superior disease-free-survival with AIs. Likewise, trials examining the use of AIs after tamoxifen have demonstrated better outcomes compared with tamoxifen alone. Additionally, letrozole has been demonstrated to result in superior disease-free-survival after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, compared with no further therapy. In general, the AIs are tolerated at least as well as tamoxifen but decrease bone mineral density and increase osteoporosis due to their lack of estrogenic effects on bone. Based on the fact that AIs appear more effective at preventing contralateral breast cancers than tamoxifen, they are being examined as breast cancer preventives. Despite available data using the AIs as adjuvant therapies, many questions remain unanswered, and further trials will be needed to address these important issues.     

Skeletal health in postmenopausal survivors of early breast cancer

Estrogen plays an important role in the skeletal health of all women. Many therapies used in the treatment of breast cancer reduce estrogen levels and have the potential to affect bone negatively by increasing the risk of osteoporosis and associated bone fractures. The long-term effects of systemic endocrine therapy on bone, therefore, are an important consideration in the adjuvant setting. Tamoxifen has been shown to have a moderate protective effect on postmenopausal bone due to its partial estrogen agonist activity; however, its long-term use is potentially associated with negative side effects, such as an increased risk of thromboembolic disease and endometrial cancer. Newer agents, the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, for example, do not possess estrogen agonist effects and have improved breast cancer outcomes when compared to the standard 5 years of tamoxifen. However, patients treated with adjuvant AIs have been shown to have an increased incidence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. In order to select the optimal adjuvant therapy for each patient, it is important to assess the overall risk:benefit ratio for each endocrine strategy. All postmenopausal women should follow published guidelines to assess the risk of osteoporosis and, where appropriate, they should receive bone mineral density monitoring. Postmenopausal women with breast cancer who are at increased risk of osteoporotic fracture should be identified and managed with appropriate nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic measures.     

Adjuvant bisphosphonates in endocrine-responsive breast cancer: what is their place in therapy?

Recent advances in the treatment of early breast cancer have improved clinical outcomes and prolonged survival, especially in women with endocrine-responsive disease. However, cancer therapies including cytotoxic chemotherapy, ovarian suppression, and aromatase inhibitors can drastically reduce circulating estrogen, increasing bone loss and fracture risk. Because most women with early breast cancer will live for many years, it is important to protect bone health during cancer therapy. Several recent clinical trials combining adjuvant endocrine therapy with bisphosphonates have demonstrated efficacy for preventing cancer treatment-induced bone loss in pre- and postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. The largest body of evidence supporting the use of adjuvant bisphosphonates comes from studies with zoledronic acid; however, studies with risedronate, ibandronate, and denosumab (a biologic agent) have also demonstrated efficacy for preventing bone loss. Adding zoledronic acid to endocrine therapy prevents bone loss and improves bone mineral density (BMD). In addition, preclinical studies suggest that bisphosphonates have direct and indirect antitumor activity, such as inducing tumor cell apoptosis, reducing tumor cell adhesion and invasion, reducing angiogenesis, activating immune responses, and synergy with chemotherapy agents, among others. Clinical trials have demonstrated significantly improved disease-free survival in patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid compared with endocrine therapy alone. Ongoing studies will further define the role of adjuvant bisphosphonates in maintaining bone health and improving clinical outcomes. The available evidence suggests that pre- and postmenopausal patients may receive clinical benefit from including bisphosphonates as part of their adjuvant treatment regimen for endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.     

Women and bone health: maximizing the benefits of aromatase inhibitor therapy

Postmenopausal women with early breast cancer (EBC) are already at risk for bone loss, osteoporosis and fracture as they age because of declining estrogen levels. Adjuvant hormonal therapy with aromatase inhibitors (AIs; e.g. letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane) can exacerbate this risk. All three AIs appear to have similar effects on bone, increasing bone turnover and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with EBC. Risk factors for bone loss can be used to assess fracture risk and the need for ongoing assessment and/or treatment in postmenopausal women receiving AIs for EBC. The concomitant, up-front use of intravenous bisphosphonate therapy, such as zoledronic acid, in combination with AIs can inhibit bone loss. In addition, a strong body of evidence suggests an anticancer activity of bisphosphonate therapy with zoledronic acid in EBC in both the pre- and postmenopausal adjuvant setting. Zoledronic acid thus provides a therapeutic option for postmenopausal women with EBC who may be at higher risk for bone loss while on AIs, allowing more patients to receive treatment with effective adjuvant hormonal therapy to prevent recurrence.     

New insights on the role of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists in premenopausal early breast cancer patients

Luteinising hormone releasing hormone agonists (LH-RHa) are effective in the treatment of advanced endocrine-sensitive breast cancer in premenopausal patients, but their role in the adjuvant setting has remained controversial for a long time.Tamoxifen for 5 years has been traditionally considered the standard endocrine therapy for premenopausal patients and this is still valid for many patients. However, the recently reported SOFT trial has suggested that adding ovarian function suppression (OFS) to tamoxifen could improve DFS in women at sufficient risk to warrant adjuvant chemotherapy and who remained premenopausal after this therapy. The administration of an aromatase inhibitor plus OFS represents an additional therapeutic option for hormone-receptor positive premenopausal breast cancer patients, according to the combined analysis of the SOFT and TEXT trials. Temporary ovarian suppression induced by LH-RHa has been recognized as an effective strategy to preserve ovarian function from the toxic effects of chemotherapy and is now recommended in young breast cancer patients with endocrine-insensitive tumors.In this review, we discuss recent data on the role of LH-RHa in combination with tamoxifen or with an aromatase inhibitor, and we comment on its role as a strategy to preserve ovarian function in young patients candidates for adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Safety of aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting

The third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane are replacing tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in most postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Although AIs have demonstrated superior efficacy and better overall safety compared with tamoxifen in randomized controlled trials, they may not provide the cardioprotective effects of tamoxifen, and bone loss may be a concern with their long-term adjuvant use. Patients require regular bone mineral density monitoring, and prophylactic bisphosphonates are being evaluated to determine whether they may protect long-term bone health. AIs decrease the risks of thromboembolic and cerebrovascular events compared with tamoxifen, and the overall rate of cardiovascular events in patients treated with AIs is within the range seen in age-matched, non-breast-cancer populations. AIs are also associated with a lower incidence of endometrial cancer and fewer vaginal bleeding/discharge events than tamoxifen. Compared with tamoxifen, the incidence of hot flashes is lower with anastrozole and letrozole but may be higher with exemestane. Generally, adverse events with AIs are predictable and manageable, whereas tamoxifen may be associated with life-threatening events in a minority of patients. Overall, the benefits of AIs over tamoxifen are achieved without compromising overall quality of life.     

Optimal treatment strategies in hormone-responsive early breast cancer: the role of aromatase inhibitors

Results from large controlled clinical trials have identified the third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as the first significant therapeutic advance in the adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early breast cancer in postmenopausal women since the introduction of tamoxifen. Although all 3 agents, letrozole, exemestane and anastrozole, provide benefits compared with a 5-year course of tamoxifen, the optimum strategy for adjuvant AI therapy has not yet been defined. AIs have been studied upfront, in sequence with tamoxifen, in therapy switch strategies after 2-3 years of tamoxifen, and after the completion of standard adjuvant tamoxifen. Clearly, only upfront treatment with an AI can address the peak risk of relapse during the first 2-3 years after surgery, and both letrozole and anastrozole significantly reduce relapses compared with tamoxifen in this setting. Switching to exemestane or anastrozole benefits women who are disease-free following 2-3 years of tamoxifen, and women who have successfully completed the standard 5 years of tamoxifen can benefit from extended adjuvant letrozole therapy. Ongoing studies will help to determine the optimum treatment strategy, and answer other important questions, such as whether the AIs differ clinically, what influence HR expression profiles have on outcomes, and what long-term toxicities may be associated with these highly effective agents.