Focal fibrosis of the breast: imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation

PURPOSE: To characterize mammographic and ultrasonographic (US) features of focal fibrosis of the breast (FFB), to compare the radiologic and histopathologic findings, to investigate the incidence of FFB, and to determine if histopathologic diagnosis of FFB is an acceptable diagnosis for specific mammographic and US findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review of findings from 1,268 surgical excisional and 796 percutaneous breast biopsies (290 US-guided, 370 stereotactically guided, and 136 vacuum-assisted stereotactically-guided) revealed 44 (2.1%) diagnoses of FFB. Mammographic and US features were correlated with histopathologic types. RESULTS: Thirty-seven (84%) of the 44 lesions diagnosed as FFB were visualized on mammograms and appeared as six (14%) circumscribed masses, two (5%) lobulated masses, one (2%) microlobulated mass, 11 (25%) obscured masses, two (5%) architectural distortions, and 15 (34%) asymmetric densities. Seven palpable lesions were not visualized on mammograms. Thirty-three of the 44 lesions were evaluated at US; 25 (76%) of 33 were visible. Twenty (80%) of 25 were well-defined hypoechoic masses; three (12%), ill-defined masses; and two (8%), marked shadowing without visible mass. At histopathologic examination, 17 (39%) of the 44 lesions were characterized as mass-like fibrosis; 14 (32%), as nodular fibrosis; 12 (27%), as haphazard fibrosis; and one (2%), as septal fibrosis. Histopathologic type and specific imaging findings did not correlate statistically. CONCLUSION: FFB is a histopathologic entity that has a wide spectrum of imaging findings. It is an acceptable histopathologic result of percutaneous breast biopsy, provided that careful radiologic-histopathologic clinical correlation is performed.     

Focal fibrosis: a common breast lesion diagnosed at imaging-guided core biopsy

OBJECTIVE: Focal fibrosis is a benign breast lesion commonly diagnosed by imaging-guided core biopsy. The goal of this study is to determine the frequency of focal fibrosis diagnosed at core biopsy and to describe its imaging features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 894 imaging-guided breast core biopsies were reviewed, and all cases of focal fibrosis were selected. The imaging features of each lesion were characterized. All lesions had been reviewed during radiologic-histologic review sessions to assess for accurate needle positioning and concordant results. Follow-up imaging and histologic data were reviewed to document lesion stability. RESULTS: Focal fibrosis was diagnosed in 80 (8.9%) of 894 imaging-guided core biopsies: 20 (8.7%) of 229 sonographically guided biopsies and 60 (9.0%) of 665 mammographically guided biopsies. Of 75 mammographically visible lesions, 39 (52%) were masses, 29 (39%) were densities, and seven (9.3%) were clusters of calcifications. Thirty-five hypoechoic lesions were visualized on sonography: 29 (80%) were oval, and six (17%) were irregularly shaped. Six (21%) of the 28 oval masses showed posterior enhancement, four (14%) posterior shadowing, and 19 (68%) neither feature. Fifty-two (65%) of 80 patients with focal fibrosis had routine imaging follow-up; all had stable findings (mean follow-up period, 27 months). No false-negative cases were identified. CONCLUSION: Focal fibrosis most commonly appears as an enlarging solid mass or developing density on mammography or as an oval mass on sonography. Our data suggest that focal fibrosis accounts for 9% of lesions that undergo imaging-guided core biopsy and that the diagnosis can be accurately reached using imaging-guided biopsy.     

Testicular US findings after biopsy

PURPOSE: To determine the ultrasonographic (US) abnormalities that may be encountered after testicular biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Testicular US studies in 33 patients (64 testes) who had undergone unilateral or bilateral testicular biopsy were retrospectively reviewed for evidence of postbiopsy changes. Biopsy had been performed in 55 testes. RESULTS: US abnormalities were found in 49 (89%) of 55 testes. These abnormalities included focal, hypoechoic, round lesions in five (9%) testes; focal hypoechoic lesions with linear margins in 27 (49%); ill-defined, localized, hypoechoic areas in four (7%); peritesticular echogenic foci in 40 (73%); linear hypoechoic striations in five (9%); and focal contour defects in three (5%). CONCLUSION: A range of US findings are encountered after testicular biopsy. The US appearance of a round hypoechoic lesion seen after biopsy can overlap with that of testicular malignancy. Other findings, such as hypoechoic lesion with linear margins, peritesticular echogenic foci, linear hypoechoic striations, and testicular contour defect, can be regarded as the benign sequelae of biopsy. In a patient with a focal, nonpalpable, hypoechoic, intratesticular lesion, a history of testicular biopsy should remind the radiologist of the increased likelihood of a benign change after biopsy, in which case follow-up US may be performed.     

Tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic and sonographic findings

PURPOSE: To determine and quantitate radiologic characteristics of tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast and to report clinical and pathologic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of records of 2872 women who received a diagnosis of breast carcinoma between January 1988 and January 2006 revealed 26 histopathologically proven tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast. Analysis included history; findings at physical examination, mammography, and sonography (US) at the time of diagnosis and in postoperative follow-up, and histopathological results. RESULTS: At physical examination, palpable mass was present in 85% (n=22) of the patients. The mammographic findings were mass in 17 (65%), asymmetric focal density in 2 (8%), architectural distortion in 2 (8%) and negative mammograms in 5 (19%) of the 26 patients. US depicted 25 masses in 24 patients, all of which were hypoechoic, with spiculated (n=13) or microlobulated (n=12) margins. The cancer was clinically occult in 12% (n=3), mammographically occult in 19% (n=5), and radiologically occult in 4% (n=1) of the patients. Histologically, the mean size of the tumor was 1.7cm and 18 (69%) patients were node negative. CONCLUSION: Tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast usually manifests clinically as a firm, immobile mass and mammographically as a spiculated or ill-defined, irregular, isodense mass without microcalcifications. Common findings on sonography include a homogeneously hypoechoic, spiculated or microlobulated mass with posterior acoustic shadowing or normal acoustic transmission. Tubulolobular carcinoma should be included in the differential diagnosis for breast masses with these imaging features.     

Clinically occult, noncalcified breast cancer: serial radiologic- pathologic correlation in 27 cases

A serial radiographic-pathologic correlation based on specimen radiography was performed on 27 consecutive, clinically occult, noncalcified breast cancers to determine the frequency of and correlation between appearances at mammography, pathologic diagnoses, and the features of the histologic margins. Twenty (74%) of the lesions were infiltrating ductal cancers, five (19%) were intraductal cancers, and two (7%) were medullary cancers. Forty-one percent of these malignancies contained microscopic calcifications. Lesions demonstrated at mammography in these 27 cases consisted of a well-defined round mass (n = 1); well-defined lobulated masses (n = 2); indistinct round, oval, or lobulated masses (n = 7); irregular or mixed lesions (n = 7); spiculated masses (n = 9); and architectural distortion (n = 1). Histologic margins of infiltrating and intraductal cancers, created by several types of tumor-fat interfaces and surrounding reactive fibrosis, correlated with these radiographic appearances. Serial specimen radiographic-pathologic correlation can improve our understanding of the appearance of early breast cancer at mammography.     

Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of sonographic guidance for biopsy of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with suspicious microcalcifications detected on mammography (15 associated with masses or distortion; eight with microcalcifications alone) underwent sonographically guided core biopsy (n = 18) or sonographically guided needle localization before excision (n = 5). Microcalcifications were targeted, and specimen radiographs were obtained for each lesion, with the success of the procedure based on identifying microcalcifications on the specimen radiograph. For core biopsies, the number of cores obtained was compared with that in 49 control patients who underwent sonographically guided core biopsy of noncalcified masses. RESULTS: All 23 lesions (100%) were successfully biopsied under sonographic guidance, with microcalcifications seen on specimen radiographs in each case. Of 18 core biopsies, a mean of 8.7 cores was obtained compared with a mean of 5.5 cores in the control group (p<0.0001). Of 13 lesions sampled with core biopsy that subsequently underwent surgical excision, three (23%) were upgraded from atypical ductal hyperplasia to ductal carcinoma in situ (n = 1) and from ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma (n = 2). Mammographically, most lesions contained more than 15 pleomorphic microcalcifications. On sonography, echogenic foci corresponded to microcalcifications in all but two cases in which broader echogenic regions were seen. When no mass or distortion was visible on mammography, sonography showed a mass or dilated ducts with internal echogenic foci. CONCLUSION: Microcalcifications identifiable on sonography can be successfully biopsied under sonographic guidance. Further study is necessary to determine whether targeting microcalcifications seen sonographically in the mass or duct can improve the rate of underestimation of disease compared with stereotactic core biopsy.     

Tubular carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, clinical and pathologic findings

PURPOSE: To determine and quantitate the radiological characteristics of tubular carcinoma of the breast, to report clinical and pathologic findings and to define findings at follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of records of 2872 women who received a diagnosis of breast carcinoma between January 1988 and January 2006 revealed 32 histopathologically proven pure tubular carcinoma of the breast. Analysis included history; findings at physical examination, mammography, and sonography (US) at the time of diagnosis and in postoperative follow-up and histopathological results. RESULTS: Fifty-nine percent of the patients (n=19) presented with a palpable mass. The mammographic findings were a mass in 23 (72%), a mass with microcalcifications in 2 (6%), asymmetric focal density in 1 (3%), architectural distortion in 1 (3%) and negative in 5 (16%) of the 32 patients. Most (96%) masses had spiculated margins. US depicted 30 masses in 29 patients, all of which were hypoechoic, mostly (n=27, 90%) with posterior acoustic shadowing. The cancer was clinically occult in 41% (n=13), mammographically occult in 16% (n=5), and sonographically occult in 6% (n=2) of the patients. Histologically, the tumor was multifocal in 3% (n=1) of the patients. Four (13%) patients developed contralateral breast carcinoma at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Tubular carcinoma has a variety of presentations, but it is mostly seen on mammography as a small spiculated mass, and on sonography as an irregular mass with posterior acoustic shadowing. Although tubular carcinoma is known as a well-differentiated tumor with excellent prognosis, the mammographic follow-up of the contralateral breast is important.     

Triple receptor-negative breast cancer: imaging and clinical characteristics

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the imaging findings of patients with breast cancer negative for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-so-called "triple receptor-negative cancer"-and to compare the mammographic findings and clinical characteristics of triple receptor-negative cancer with non-triple receptor-negative cancers (i.e., ER-positive, PR-positive, or HER2-positive or two of the three markers positive). CONCLUSION: Triple receptor-negative cancer was most commonly an irregular noncalcified mass with ill-defined or spiculated margins on mammography and a hypoechoic or complex mass with an irregular shape and noncircumscribed margins on ultrasound. Most triple receptor-negative cancers were discovered on physical examination. Compared with non-triple receptor-negative cancers, triple receptor-negative cancers were found in younger women and were a higher pathologic grade.     

Initial experience with the advanced breast biopsy instrumentation device.

OBJECTIVE: The Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation (ABBI) device (United States Surgical; Norwalk, CT) is designed to percutaneously excise nonpalpable breast lesions. Because this is a new technique, we report our initial experience with regard to technical success, complications, and histologic margins for malignancies. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From May 14, 1997, until March 4, 1998, 89 consecutive patients elected to undergo the ABBI procedure. Preprocedure imaging included screening mammography and additional mammographic and sonographic studies when deemed necessary. Lesions were targeted by the surgeons. Specimen radiography was performed for all lesions, and the images were interpreted by radiologists. Pathologic analysis was provided or reviewed by a dedicated breast pathologist. Parameters analyzed included technical success, complications, lesion size, histologic diagnosis, and margin status for malignant lesions. RESULTS: There were 29 patients with 30 noncalcified masses, 53 patients with clustered calcifications, three patients with masses and calcifications, three patients with asymmetric densities, and one patient with architectural distortion. Eighteen ABBI procedures were aborted, converted to core biopsy, or failed to remove the targeted lesion. Fifteen patients experienced a total of 19 complications; 10 of the complications required treatment and follow-up after the biopsy. Of 11 malignant tumors revealed by ABBI, four had negative margins. Seven of these 11 malignant tumors had positive margins. CONCLUSION: The ABBI procedure had a high number of complications and technical failures and did not reliably provide cancer-free margins for malignant tumors. Women with nonpalpable breast lesions that need a tissue diagnosis are better treated by stereotactic or sonographically guided needle biopsy.     

Fibrotic lesions of the breast: radiological findings and core-neddle biopsy results

Objectives

To evaluate the incidence of breast lesions with a histopathological diagnosis of focal fibrosis based on imaging guided core biopsy, to review the radiologic findings and to assess the diagnostic reliability of 14 G core needle biopsy.

Materials and methods

723 patients, who had undergone 14 G core biopsy and/or surgical excisions, were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, 43 lesions were diagnosed as focal fibrosis. Physical examination, mammography, ultrasonography, and follow-up findings were all reviewed.

Results

Radiological evaluation revealed that 35 (81%) lesions were solid masses. Of 35 mass lesions, 24 (69%) were well circumscribed, the remaining 11 (31%) lesions were ill defined on mammograms or sonograms. None of the lesions had pathological microcalcifications. Three lesions were surgically excised because of radio-pathological discordance after core needle biopsy.

Conclusions

Focal fibrosis of the breast is a benign condition and reflects the ductal and lobular atrophy secondary to stromal proliferation. The radiological findings of this entity may vary and sometimes mimic those of malignant lesions. The incidence of focal fibrosis among our study population is 6% and a well-defined mass lesion is the most frequent finding. Core needle biopsy is a safe and reliable diagnostic procedure in the management of these cases.     

Evaluation of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the utility of sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy to evaluate renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of our imaging-guided procedures from January 1999 to June 2001. We performed 26 sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsies of renal masses in 26 patients. From two to five specimens were obtained from a single mass in each patient using an 18-gauge automated biopsy system. We examined the patients' medical records, pathology results, and imaging studies. Core biopsy results were compared with surgical pathology (n = 6) or clinical follow-up (n = 20). RESULTS: All biopsies provided sufficient material for analysis. Biopsy findings were positive for malignancy in 19 (73%) of 26 masses. Histologic diagnoses included renal cell carcinoma were (n = 11), metastasis (n = 3), lymphoma (n = 2), and transitional cell carcinoma (n = 2). Specific cell type characterization could not be made on one biopsy, but the specimens were highly suspicious for malignancy. Biopsy revealed seven (27%) of 26 benign diagnoses: oncocytoma (n = 3), angiomyolipoma (n = 2), and fibrosis (n = 2). The average follow-up period for patients with benign diagnoses was 10 months. One case of surgically proven necrotic pyelonephritis was mischaracterized as fibrosis at core biopsy. Sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of malignancy. The core specimens yielded a specific diagnosis in 92% (24/26) of masses. No immediate complications occurred after the procedure. One patient developed a pseudoaneurysm that presented 3 months after the biopsy. CONCLUSION. Sonographically guided percutaneous core biopsy is a reliable and accurate method for evaluating renal masses.     

Stromal fibrosis of the breast

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe the imaging features of stromal fibrosis of the breast and to determine the false-negative rate (number of cancers missed) at percutaneous biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1997 and October 1999, 1095 imaging-guided core biopsies were performed. Patients were included in our study if stromal fibrosis was the predominant histologic finding. Cores adjacent to previous excisional biopsies or from calcified lesions were excluded. RESULTS: Stromal fibrosis was diagnosed in 74 (6.8%) of 1095 imaging-guided core needle biopsies in 73 patients. The 10 mammographic lesions were variable in appearance. Most of the sonographic lesions were indeterminate, with 16 (25%) of 64 showing suspicious features. Discordant imaging resulted in three patients having a second core biopsy and nine patients having an excisional biopsy. The two false-negative findings were the result of an infiltrating lobular carcinoma and an infiltrating ductal carcinoma, the latter diagnosis delayed for 6 months. CONCLUSION: The low incidence (2.7%) of missed cancers in our series suggests that patients diagnosed at core biopsy as having stromal fibrosis can be treated conservatively with a short-term follow-up protocol. However, it would be prudent to continue to recommend either a second core biopsy or an excisional biopsy for imaging features that cannot be reliably differentiated from malignancy.     

Touch-preparation cytologic examination of breast core biopsy specimens: Accuracy in predicting benign or malignant core histologic results

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of touch-preparation cytologic examination of breast core biopsy specimens in predicting benign or malignant core histologic results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred two core biopsies were performed on 88 women with stereotactic or ultrasonographic (US) guidance. Slides were prepared by smearing one core sample on each slide, spraying the slides with fixative, and staining them with the Papanicolaou technique. Slides were blindly reviewed by a cytopathologist. Cytologic results were categorized as positive for malignancy, not diagnostic for malignancy, or insufficient for diagnosis. Results were correlated with histologic results from all specimens obtained during the core biopsy. RESULTS: Imaging depicted the lesions sampled for biopsy as masses (n = 70), clustered calcifications (n = 29), focal asymmetries (n = 2), or architectural distortion (n = 1). Touch-preparation slides of 87 (85%) lesions contained sufficient material for diagnosis. Cytologic results correctly identified 12 of 16 (three of five intraductal and nine of 11 invasive) malignancies in 10 of 13 masses and two of three clusters of calcifications. Two false-positive results occurred, both with fibroadenomas. Overall, touch-preparation studies produced 69 true-negative and four false-negative results. Excluding slides with insufficient material, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of touch-preparation results were 75%, 97%, and 93%, respectively. Including insufficient samples, accuracy was 79%. CONCLUSION: Although touch-preparation cytologic examination of breast core biopsy specimens is fairly accurate in prediction of benign or malignant core histologic results, its correlation with histologic results is not sufficient to justify routine use in immediate counseling and treatment planning.     

Proliferative high-risk lesions of the breast: contribution and limits of US-guided core biopsy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively correlate high-risk proliferative breast lesions (radial scar, atypical lobular hyperplasia, lobular carcinoma in situ and papillary lesions) diagnosed on core biopsy with the definitive histopathological diagnosis obtained after surgical excision or with the follow-up, in order to assess the role of core biopsy in such lesions. To discuss the management of the patient after a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 74 out of 1776 core biopsies consecutively performed on 67 patients. The histopathologic findings were as follows: 11 radial scars (RS), 3 atypical lobular hyperplasias (ALH), 3 lobular carcinomas in situ (LCIS), 57 benign papillary lesions. All patients underwent bilateral mammography, whole-breast ultrasound with a linear-array broadband transducer, and core biopsy with a 14 Gauge needle and a mean number of samples of 5 (range 4-7). Sixty-two of 67 patients, for a total of 69/74 lesions, underwent surgical biopsy despite benign histopathologic findings, mostly because of highly suspicious imaging for malignancy (BIRADS 4-5), whereas 5 patients refused surgery and have been followed up for a least 18 months and are still being followed up (2 with RS, 1 with ADH and 2 with papillary lesions). RESULTS: Among the core biopsied lesions with a diagnosis of RS (n = 11) pathology revealed one ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (this case was characterized by granular microcalcifications on mammography and by a mass with irregular margins on ultrasound). Also in the group of ADH (n = 3) pathology revealed one DCIS (lesion not visible on mammography but depicted as a suspicious mass on US). In the group of LCIS (n = 3) pathologists found an invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Among the benign papillary lesions (n = 57) histopathologic analysis of the surgical specimen revealed 7 malignant lesions (4 papillary carcinomas and 3 DCIS), whose mammographic and ultrasound findings were indistinguishable from benign lesions. Altogether there were 10 false negative results (underestimation) out of 74 core biopsies with a diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions. CONCLUSION: The high rate of histological underestimation after core biopsy (10/74) (13.5%) demands a very careful management of patents with a core biopsy diagnosis of high-risk proliferative breast lesions, especially in the case of RS, lobular neoplasia and papillary lesions. However, the high imaging suspicion for malignancy prompts surgery. It is possible to assume that, when there is a low imaging suspicion for malignancy, when enough tissue has been sampled for pathology and no atypia is found within the lesions, surgery is not mandatory but a very careful follow-up is recommended. We must underline that there is no agreement regarding the quantity of tissue to sample. Vacuum-assisted biopsy may lead to better results, although there is as yet no proof that it can actually replace surgery in this group of lesions, since it seems only to reduce but not abolish the histological underestimation.     

Hypoechoic lesions without halo in echogenic liver. A frequent sonographic dilemma

Sonographic evaluation for the presence of hypoechoic hepatic lesions without halo was carried out in 365 consecutive patients with echogenic livers. In 115 patients (31%) such lesions could be demonstrated. Computed tomography of the liver was performed in 52 of these patients, a long term sonographic follow-up in 76, and a biopsy in 3 cases. In 103 patients the hypoechoic lesions were due to sonographic pseudolesions (PL's), probably representing normal liver tissue in otherwise diffusely fatty infiltrated livers. The PL's showed characteristic sonographic appearances such as a missing mass effect, a 'landscape'-like configuration with angulated margins and slender extensions of hypoechoic tissue. The PL's were located below the capsule, near the gallbladder (41%), and ventral to the portal vein (37%). In 75 per cent they occurred in a liver with considerably increased echogenicity. In 12 patients hypoechoic lesions were caused by circumscribed malignant or infectious involvement of the liver. They could be discriminated from PL's by their mass-like appearance in 8 subjects. In 4 of these 12 cases the foci were of PL-typical appearance, but not of PL-typical location. In the light of these results and of recently published reports a rational diagnostic approach to hypoechoic lesions without halo in echogenic livers varies, depending on such factors as known primary malignancy or site of the lesion.     

Focal nodular hyperplasia: CT findings with emphasis on multiphasic helical CT in 78 patients

PURPOSE: To evaluate features of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) at multiphasic helical computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical, pathologic, and preoperative imaging findings were retrospectively reviewed in 78 patients. Conventional liver CT was performed in nine patients; helical multiphasic CT, in 69. Diagnosis was based on complete resection (n = 20), biopsy (n = 42), or clinical and imaging follow-up for a minimum of 6 months (n = 16). Number, size, location, margins, surface, homogeneity of enhancement, and presence of a central scar, mass effect, exophytic growth, calcification, pseudocapsule, or vessels feeding or draining the lesion were evaluated. RESULTS: CT depicted 124 tumors (mean diameter, 4.1 cm; range, 1-11 cm); 62 were small (< or =3 cm). FNHs were hypervascular and hyperattenuating to liver on 106 of 106 arterial phase scans and were isoattenuating to liver on 82 of 89 delayed scans. Of the 124 tumors, 111 enhanced homogeneously, 109 had a smooth surface, 101 were subcapsular, 89 had ill-defined margins, and 62 had a central scar that was observed more often in large lesions (40 of 62 lesions) than in small lesions (22 of 62 lesions). FNHs less frequently exerted a mass effect (43 lesions), had vessels around or within the lesion (42 lesions), demonstrated exophytic growth (40 lesions), or showed a pseudocapsule (10 lesions). Only one FNH had calcification. CONCLUSION: Helical CT demonstrates characteristic features that may allow confident diagnosis of FNH. In typical cases, neither biopsy nor further imaging is necessary.     

Image-guided core breast biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a non-calcified abnormality

Objective: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) typically presents as calcifications which are detected mammographically. Our aim was to evaluate the less common presentations of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by image-guided core biopsy and correlate with histopathologic diagnoses. Methods and Material: Imaging and histopathologic findings were retrospectively reviewed in 11 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed at core biopsy that presented as noncalcified radiographic abnormalities. Results: Mammography showed non-calcified, circumscribed nodules, ill-defined nodules and architectural distortion. In two patients, no mammographic abnormality was detected. Sonography showed circumscribed, round or oval, solid masses; irregular, heterogeneous masses; and a tubular structure. Histopathologic diagnoses included multiple architectural subtypes and ranged from low to high nuclear grade. Conclusion: Although image-guided core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma is typically made when sampling calcifications, DCIS can be diagnosed following biopsy of non-calcified masses or distortion. There is no correlation between histopathologic subtype and radiologic appearance.     

Organizing pneumonia: perilobular pattern at thin-section CT

PURPOSE: To describe the appearance and frequency of a perilobular pattern at thin-section computed tomography (CT) in patients with organizing pneumonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thin-section CT scans of 21 consecutive patients with cryptogenic organizing pneumonia were retrospectively reviewed. Two thoracic radiologists in consensus recorded the presence and distribution of the CT abnormalities (consolidation, ground-glass opacification, nodules, bandlike opacities, interlobular septal thickening, and findings of fibrosis), with a particular focus on the presence and predominant location of the perilobular pattern, that is, a poorly defined arcadelike or polygonal appearance. RESULTS: The perilobular pattern was present in 12 (57%) of 21 patients, 10 of whom had five or more perilobular opacities. Other CT features were consolidation (20 patients, 95%), which was predominantly a subpleural and/or peribronchial distribution in 17 patients, and ground-glass opacification (18 patients, 86%). Bandlike opacities and interlobular septal thickening were observed in four patients and one patient, respectively. The perilobular pattern abutted the pleural surface in 10 of 12 patients and was surrounded by aerated lung parenchyma in 11 of 12 patients. There was no obvious relationship between perilobular opacities and CT findings indicative of established fibrosis. CONCLUSION: A perilobular pattern was present in more than half of the patients, along with the expected thin-section CT features of organizing pneumonia.     

MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of screening magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the detection of synchronous contralateral breast cancer in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1999 and July 2001, 182 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (after either core or excisional biopsy with positive or close margins of resection) underwent bilateral contrast material-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T with a dedicated bilateral breast multicoil array. The contralateral breast was imaged for cancer screening. Family history of breast cancer, index cancer histology, breast density, and age at diagnosis of first breast cancer were assessed as potential risk factors for synchronous contralateral breast cancer. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (8.2%) had a suspicious enhancing lesion depicted in the contralateral breast. Seven patients (3.8%) had malignant results: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in four, invasive ductal carcinoma with DCIS in two, and invasive ductal carcinoma in one. Eight patients (4.4%) had benign results: fibrocystic changes in four, atypical ductal hyperplasia in two, atypical lobular hyperplasia and focal lobular carcinoma in situ in one, and ductal hyperplasia in one. Six patients with negative MR findings underwent prophylactic mastectomy; no malignancy was found. No significant differences were noted among patients with true-positive (n = 7), false-positive (n = 8), or negative (n = 167) MR findings with regard to family history of breast cancer (P <.27), index cancer histology (P <.19), breast density (P <.34), or age at diagnosis of first breast cancer (P <.10). CONCLUSION: The preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of using MR imaging of the breast in a screening role, specifically to evaluate the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer to detect mammographically and clinically occult synchronous breast cancer.