Development of Doxycycline MIC and Disk Diffusion Interpretive Breakpoints and Revision of Tetracycline Breakpoints for Streptococcus pneumoniae

A study was performed to derive susceptibility testing interpretive breakpoints for doxycycline with Streptococcus pneumoniae and to reassess breakpoints for tetracycline using the requirements defined in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document M23-A3. Tetracycline and doxycycline MICs and disk diffusion zone sizes were determined on 189 isolates selected from the 2009-2010 CDC Active Bacterial Core surveillance strain collection according to the testing methods described in CLSI documents M07-A8 and M02-A10. Tetracycline and doxycycline MICs and zones were compared to each other directly, and the reproducibility of MICs and zone diameters for both drugs was determined. Scattergrams of tetracycline MICs versus corresponding zone diameters and doxycycline MICs versus zones were prepared, and analysis indicated that the present CLSI tetracycline MIC and disk breakpoints did not fit the susceptibility data for doxycycline. Doxycycline was 1 to 3 dilutions more potent than tetracycline, especially in strains harboring the tetM resistance determinant. tetM was detected in ≥90% of isolates having tetracycline MICs of ≥4 μg/ml and in ≥90% with doxycycline MICs of ≥1. Limited pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data coupled with application of the error-rate bounded method of analysis suggested doxycycline-susceptible breakpoints of either ≤0.25 μg/ml or ≤0.5 μg/ml, with intermediate and resistant breakpoints 1 and 2 dilutions higher, respectively. The disk diffusion zone diameter correlates were susceptible at ≥28 mm, intermediate at 25 to 27 mm, and resistant at ≤24 mm. Revised lower tetracycline MIC breakpoints were suggested as susceptible at ≤1 μg/ml, intermediate at 2 μg/ml, and resistant at ≥4 μg/ml. Suggested tetracycline disk diffusion zones were identical to those of doxycycline.     

Interpretive criteria for temocillin disk diffusion susceptibility testing

The susceptibility of 677 clinical bacterial isolates to temocillin was determined by broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for the purpose of evaluating disks with three different temocillin concentrations and determining the temocillin disk diffusion interpretive criteria. The 60μg temocillin disk provided the highest interpretive accuracy (96.2 %), although the 30μg disk differed by having only three (1.2 %) additional minor interpretive errors. Based on available temocillin pharmacokinetics and recommended dosage schedules, the minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoints chosen were: ? 32μg/ml = resistant and ? 16μg/ml = susceptible. The corresponding disk diffusion zone diameter breakpoints for the 60μg disk were ? 17 mm and ? 21 mm; zone diameters of 18–20 mm were considered intermediate. For the 30μg disk these were ? 15 mm, ? 19 mm and 16–18 mm respectively.     

Cefotiam susceptibility testing criteria.

Interpretive zone size breakpoints for diffusion tests with 30-micrograms cefotiam disks are diameters of greater than or equal to 18 mm for susceptible and less than or equal to 14 mm for resistant strains. The standard control strains Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 should both give zones 27 to 33 mm in diameter. Tests with 579 clinical isolates yielded an unacceptably high rate of very major discrepancies between disk tests and microdilution tests; such discrepancies were especially common among Enterobacter spp. Additional studies support the concept that standard microdilution tests and standard disk diffusion tests may fail to detect a potential for resistance among some microorganisms.     

Assessment of metronidazole susceptibility in Helicobacter pylori: statistical validation and error rate analysis of breakpoints determined by the disk diffusion test

Metronidazole susceptibility of 100 Helicobacter pylori strains was assessed by determining the inhibition zone diameters by disk diffusion test and the MICs by agar dilution and PDM Epsilometer test (E test). Linear regression analysis was performed, allowing the definition of significant linear relations, and revealed correlations of disk diffusion results with both E-test and agar dilution results (r2 = 0.88 and 0.81, respectively). No significant differences (P = 0.84) were found between MICs defined by E test and those defined by agar dilution, taken as a standard. Reproducibility comparison between E-test and disk diffusion tests showed that they are equivalent and with good precision. Two interpretative susceptibility schemes (with or without an intermediate class) were compared by an interpretative error rate analysis method. The susceptibility classification scheme that included the intermediate category was retained, and breakpoints were assessed for diffusion assay with 5-microg metronidazole disks. Strains with inhibition zone diameters less than 16 mm were defined as resistant (MIC > 8 microg/ml), those with zone diameters equal to or greater than 16 mm but less than 21 mm were considered intermediate (4 microg/ml < MIC 相似文献   

Fluoroquinolone Susceptibility Testing of Salmonella enterica: Detection of Acquired Resistance and Selection of Zone Diameter Breakpoints for Levofloxacin and Ofloxacin

Fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin) have become a mainstay for treating severe Salmonella infections in adults. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella is mostly due to mutations in the topoisomerase genes, but plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) mechanisms have also been described. In 2012, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) revised the ciprofloxacin interpretive criteria (breakpoints) for disk diffusion and MIC test methods for Salmonella. In 2013, the CLSI published MIC breakpoints for Salmonella to levofloxacin and ofloxacin, but breakpoints for assigning disk diffusion results to susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) categories are still needed. In this study, the MICs and inhibition zone diameters for nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and ofloxacin were determined for 100 clinical isolates of nontyphi Salmonella with or without resistance mechanisms. We confirmed that the new levofloxacin MIC breakpoints resulted in the highest category agreement (94%) when plotted against the ciprofloxacin MICs and that the new ofloxacin MIC breakpoints resulted in 92% category agreement between ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. By applying the new MIC breakpoints in the MIC zone scattergrams for levofloxacin and ofloxacin, the following disk diffusion breakpoints generated the least number of errors: ≥28 mm (S), 19 to 27 mm (I), and ≤18 mm (R) for levofloxacin and ≥25 mm (S), 16 to 24 mm (I), and ≤15 mm (R) for ofloxacin. Neither the levofloxacin nor the ofloxacin disk yielded good separation of isolates with and without resistance mechanisms. Further studies will be needed to develop a disk diffusion assay that efficiently detects all isolates with acquired resistance to fluoroquinolones.     

MIC determination of fusidic acid and of ciprofloxacin using multidisk diffusion tests

Objective   To investigate the possibility of estimating the MICs of fusidic acid and ciprofloxacin for bacterial isolates using series of antibiotic disk concentrations in diffusion tests, so-called M-tests.
Methods   Thirty Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis strains were tested for fusidic acid susceptibility. Sixty-one clinical isolates of eight bacterial species were tested for ciprofloxacin susceptibility. Disk diffusion was standardized according to the Swedish reference group for antibiotics (SRGA). For fusidic acid, a series of disks (1.5, 5.0, 15, 50 and 150 µg) was used. Ciprofloxacin was applied in four different diffusion sources (1, 3, 10 and 30 µg) on a single strip, the M-strip, and used. True MIC values were determined using the standardized agar dilution method according to the SRGA. Single-strain regression analysis (SRA) was employed to calculate critical concentration equivalents ( Q _zero).
Results   Fusidic acid and ciprofloxacin critical concentrations were determined for the bacterial isolates. The mean conversion factors for Q _zero to yield the true MIC were 2.06 (range 0.34–8.9) for fusidic acid and 2.05 (range 0.37–8.1) for ciprofloxacin. There was a correlation between true MIC values (all MICs expressed as 2 log + 9) and the calculated MIC values ( Q _zero× conversion factor) for both fusidic acid ( R  = 0.9822) and ciprofloxacin ( R  = 0.9696).
Conclusions   MIC values of clinical isolates can be estimated using SRA calculations on zone measurements in disk tests with several concentrations of the antibiotic in diffusion sources.     

Development of interpretive criteria and quality control limits for macrolide and clindamycin susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

A six-laboratory collaborative study was conducted to develop MIC and zone diameter quality control limits and interpretive criteria for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae with azithromycin, clarithromycin, dirithromycin, and clindamycin. The MICs of all of the agents plus erythromycin for 302 clinical isolates of pneumococci that had been selected with an emphasis on resistant strains were determined by use of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)-recommended broth microdilution procedure. The zone diameters of the isolates were also determined for the same agents except erythromycin by the NCCLS disk diffusion test procedure. Repeated testing of S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 with different sources and lots of media and disks allowed development of MIC and zone diameter quality control ranges for these agents. Interpretive criteria for the MIC of azithromycin were established and were as follows: susceptible, < or = 0.5 microgram/ml; intermediate, 1 microgram/ml; and resistant, > or = 2 micrograms/ml. The interpretive criteria advocated for the MICs of clarithromycin and clindamycin were as follows: susceptible, < or = 0.25 microgram/ml; intermediate, 0.5 microgram/ml; and resistant, > or = 1 microgram/ml. Comparison of MICs and disk diffusion zone diameters led to the development of interpretive criteria for the zone diameters for azithromycin, clarithromycin, and clindamycin that correlated well with these MIC breakpoints. Testing of this organism collection also led to the reestablishment of the erythromycin MIC breakpoints as being identical to those of clarithromycin, which resulted in equivalent cross-susceptibility and cross-resistance for the three macrolides that are currently marketed in the United States. Thus, the susceptibility of pneumococci to azithromycin and clarithromycin can be predicted accurately by testing only erythromycin in clinical laboratories. This recommendation, as well as the interpretive and quality control criteria that are described, have been accepted by NCCLS and are included in the latest NCCLS susceptibility testing guidelines.     

Proposed disk diffusion susceptibility criteria for ofloxacin.

Disk diffusion zone diameter breakpoint criteria for ofloxacin were tentatively established by correlating MICs with 1-, 3-, and 5-micrograms disk inhibitory zone diameters for 638 bacterial isolates representing 36 species. We recommend use of 5-micrograms disks with the following breakpoints: susceptible (MIC, less than or equal to 2.0 micrograms/ml), greater than or equal to 16 mm; intermediate (MIC, 4.0 micrograms/ml), 13 to 15 mm; and resistant (MIC, greater than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml), less than or equal to 12 mm.     

Evaluation of proposed criteria of disk susceptibility testing for tosufloxacin and lomefloxacin in NCCLS guidelines and WHO standards]

Disk diffusion zone diameter breakpoint criteria for Tosufloxacin and Lomefloxacin were tentatively established by correlating MICs with 1-, 5- and 10 micrograms of Tosufloxacin disk inhibitory zone diameters and with 10 micrograms of Lomefloxacin disk of those to 418 clinical isolates representing 32 species. We recommend 5 micrograms disks for Tosufloxacin with the following breakpoints: Susceptible (MIC, less than or equal to 0.5 microgram/ml), greater than or equal to 22 mm; intermediate, 17 to 21 mm; and resistant (MIC, greater than or equal to 2.0 micrograms/ml), less than or equal to 16 mm. We recommend 10 micrograms disks for Lomefloxacin with the following breakpoints: Susceptible (MIC, less than or equal to 2.0 micrograms/ml), greater than or equal to 21 mm; intermediate, 16 to 20 mm; and resistant (MIC, greater than or equal to 8.0 micrograms/ml), less than or equal to 15 mm. Using these criteria for Tosufloxacin and Lomefloxacin, the occurrence rate of major errors in judging susceptibility and resistance was 0.48%.     

Single-strain regression analysis for determination of interpretive breakpoints for cefoperazone disk diffusion susceptibility testing.

A novel approach for setting interpretive breakpoints in disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing according to determined minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) limits is described, using the method of single-strain regression analysis. The procedure was tested on reference strains Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Streptococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853), using published results from cefoperazone disk diffusion experiments. The correlation between logarithm of the disk content and inhibition zone diameter squared was linear, excluding three endpoint values. When constants A and B in the new regression line equation were calculated for the four strains, all four showed different regression lines. Zone diameters corresponding to various MICs were calculated for a disk content of 75 micrograms. The values obtained for the four strains were 20.1, 20.9, 24.9, and 25.8 mm, respectively, for an MIC of 16 micrograms/ml, and 15.7, 15.7, 22.3, and 17.9 mm, respectively, for an MIC of 64 micrograms/ml. The following zone diameter breakpoints were determined for the "I" (intermediate) category, using a 75-micrograms disk: S. aureus, 18 to 15 mm; S. faecalis, 23 to 13 mm; E. coli, 20 to 17 mm; and P. aeruginosa, 20 to 17 mm.     

Reevaluation of interpretive criteria for Haemophilus influenzae by using meropenem (10-microgram), imipenem (10-microgram), and ampicillin (2- and 10-microgram) disks.

A collection of 300 Haemophilus influenzae clinical strains was used to assess in vitro susceptibility to carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem) by MIC and disk diffusion methods and to compare disk diffusion test results with two potencies of ampicillin disks (2 and 10 micrograms). The isolates included ampicillin-susceptible or- intermediate (167 strains), beta-lactamase-positive (117 strains), and beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR; 16 strains) organisms. Disk diffusion testing was performed with 10-micrograms meropenem disks from two manufacturers. Meropenem was highly active against H. influenzae strains (MIC50, 0.06 microgram/ml; MIC90, 0.25 microgram/ml; MIC50 and MIC90, MICs at which 50 and 90%, respectively, of strains are inhibited) and was 8- to 16-fold more potent than imipenem (MIC50, 1 microgram/ml; MIC90, 2 micrograms/ml). Five non-imipenem-susceptible strains were identified (MIC, 8 micrograms/ml), but the disk diffusion test indicated susceptibility (zone diameters, 18 to 21 mm). MIC values of meropenem, doxycycline, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone for BLNAR strains were two- to fourfold greater than those for other strains. The performance of both meropenem disks was comparable and considered acceptable. A single susceptible interpretive zone diameter of > or = 17 mm (MIC, < = or 4 micrograms/ml) was proposed for meropenem. Testing with the 2-micrograms ampicillin disk was preferred because of an excellent correlation between MIC values and zone diameters (r = 0.94) and superior interpretive accuracy with the susceptible criteria at > or = 17 mm (MIC, < or = 1 microgram/ml) and the resistant criteria at < or = 13 mm (MIC, > or = 4 micrograms/ml). Among the BLNAR strains tested, 81.3% were miscategorized as susceptible or intermediate when the 10-micrograms ampicillin disk was used, while the 2-micrograms disk produced only minor interpretive errors (12.5%). Use of these criteria for testing H. influenzae against meropenem and ampicillin should maximize reference test and standardized disk diffusion test performance with the Haemophilus Test Medium. The imipenem disk diffusion test appears compromised and should be used with caution for detecting strains for which imipenem MICs are elevated.     

Fluconazole Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Testing of Candida Species

We describe a simple procedure for detecting fluconazole-resistant yeasts by a disk diffusion method. Forty clinical Candida sp. isolates were tested on RPMI-glucose agar with either 25- or 50-μg fluconazole disks. With 25-μg disks, zones of inhibition of ≥20 mm at 24 h accurately identified 29 of 29 isolates for which MICs were ≤8 μg/ml, and with 50-μg disks, zones of ≥27 mm identified 28 of 29 such isolates. All 11 isolates for which MICs were >8 μg/ml were identified by using either disk. Disk diffusion may be a useful screening method for clinical microbiology laboratories.     

Determination of Penicillin MICs for Streptococcus pneumoniae by Using a Two- or Three-Disk Diffusion Procedure

The potential for the use of the disk diffusion method to accurately predict penicillin MICs for Streptococcus pneumoniae was investigated with penicillin (6 μg), methicillin (5 μg), and oxacillin (1 μg) disks. A total of 183 S. pneumoniae isolates were tested by three MIC procedures (agar dilution, microdilution, and E-test). Regression analyses of the geometric mean of the three MIC results against (i) the sum of the zone diameters for methicillin, penicillin, and oxacillin disks; (ii) the sum of the zone diameters for methicillin and penicillin disks; and (iii) each of the three individual zone diameters were performed. Calculated MICs were determined from each of these regression analyses and compared to the mean reference MICs. A high level of correlation was obtained with both the two- and the three-disk procedures (r = 0.97), with essential agreement rates (±1 doubling dilution) between MICs calculated by the three-disk procedure and the two-disk procedure and the mean reference MICs of 98.4 and 98.9%, respectively. No major or very major errors were obtained with the two- or three-disk procedures. The accuracy of the disks used individually was lower (r = 0.84 to 0.93). However, oxacillin and methicillin disk testing remain excellent for screening strains, with all penicillin-susceptible strains having zones of >21 and >22 mm, respectively. The combination disk procedure, which involves the use of three disks (methicillin, oxacillin, and penicillin) or two disks (methicillin and penicillin) for testing S. pneumoniae, can provide accurate penicillin MICs and qualitative category results that are comparable to results obtained by the E-test, agar, and microdilution MIC methods.     

Caspofungin disk diffusion breakpoints and quality control

Interpretive disk diffusion breakpoints for caspofungin are proposed by evaluating 762 isolates of Candida spp., representing 10 different species obtained as part of the caspofungin clinical trials. Standardized broth microdilution reference tests were compared to the zone diameters observed with 5-microg caspofungin disks produced by two different disk manufacturers. Disk diffusion breakpoints of >or=11 mm for susceptible are proposed. Compared to results from MIC testing, these zone diameters produced error rates that were 相似文献   

Preliminary antimicrobial susceptibility interpretive criteria for cefetamet (Ro 15-8074) and cefteram (Ro 19-5247) disk tests

Preliminary interpretive zone criteria were calculated for cefetamet (Ro 15-8074) and cefteram (Ro 19-5247) by using 10- and 30-micrograms disks and three possible MIC susceptibility breakpoints. Absolute interpretive agreement between MICs and zone size criteria ranged from 91.8 to 97.2%. Very major errors (false susceptibility) were less than or equal to 1.2% for both cephalosporin disk tests. Morganella morganii strains appeared to produce the highest rates of very major interpretive errors with cefetamet disks.     

Criteria for disk susceptibility tests and quality control guidelines for the cefoperazone-sulbactam combination.

For in vitro susceptibility tests with cefoperazone and sulbactam (a beta-lactamase inhibitor), 75/30-micrograms disks may be used with the interpretive zone size breakpoints that are currently used for 75-micrograms cefoperazone disks. For dilution tests, a 2:1 ratio of cefoperazone to sulbactam is recommended. For quality control purposes, MIC limits that are used to monitor cefoperazone tests were also applied to tests with the combination of drugs. For gram-negative control strains, zone size limits were calculated to be 1 mm smaller than those used for cefoperazone disks. To monitor the sulbactam portion of the combination, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus subsp. anitratus ATCC 43498 was selected; zones with 75/30-micrograms disks were 26 to 32 mm in diameter, and broth microdilution MICs ranged from 1.0/0.5 to 8.0/4.0 micrograms/ml. With cefoperazone alone, MICs for Acinetobacter calcoaceticus subsp. anitratus were 16 to 64 micrograms/ml and zones ranged from 14 to 18 mm in diameter. For anaerobic dilution tests, only Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron ATCC 29741 is recommended for cefoperazone-sulbactam; MICs ranged from 8.0/4.0 to 32/16 micrograms/ml.     

Proposed interpretive criteria and quality control parameters for ofloxacin susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

A multilaboratory study designed to determine the in vitro susceptibility criteria and quality control parameters for ofloxacin against Neisseria gonorrhoeae was conducted according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Proposed susceptibility breakpoints are MICs of less than or equal to 0.25 microgram/ml for the agar dilution test and greater than or equal to 31 mm for the disk diffusion test. A category for resistance could not be defined. Proposed acceptable quality control MICs for N. gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213 range from 0.004 to 0.03 microgram/ml and 0.25 to 1.0 microgram/ml, respectively. With 5-micrograms ofloxacin disks, acceptable inhibitory zone diameters for S. aureus ATCC 25923 and the N. gonorrhoeae control strains range from 22 to 27 mm and 43 to 51 mm, respectively.     

Disk diffusion method for susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

The standard medium for disk diffusion and MIC testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (that of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) was tested to establish zone correlations for the MIC breakpoints currently used in Sweden. Eight gonococcal control strains representing both susceptible and resistant strains and 50 clinical isolates were tested. The standard medium did not support the growth of two control strains and three clinical isolates when the standardized inoculum was used in the disk diffusion test. The same medium with the addition of hemoglobin was introduced. This medium supported the growth of all strains. The correlations between the MICs and the zones of inhibition were calculated for penicillin, ampicillin, cefuroxime, erythromycin, tetracycline, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin, and spectinomycin. The range of MICs for the clinical isolates were broad, without bimodal distribution, for all antibiotics, except ciprofloxacin and spectinomycin. With the susceptibility distribution of MICs and zones near the current susceptible and intermediate or intermediate and resistant limits, a low reproducibility of tests and a high frequency of minor interpretive errors can be expected. A revision of MIC breakpoints seems warranted but can only be done after renewed clinical evaluation of different treatment regimens.     

Antipneumococcal activity of telithromycin by agar dilution, microdilution, E test, and disk diffusion methodologies

Agar dilution and microdilution (both in air) and E test and disk diffusion (both in air and CO(2)) were used to test the activity of telithromycin against 110 erythromycin-susceptible and 106 erythromycin-resistant pneumococci. The MICs at which 50 and 90% of strains are inhibited (MIC(50)s and MIC(90)s, respectively) for erythromycin-susceptible strains varied between 0.008 and 0.016 microg/ml and 0.016 and 0.03 microg/ml when the samples were incubated in air. By comparison, telithromycin MIC(50)s and MIC(90)s for erythromycin-resistant strains were in air 0.03 to 0.125 and 0. 125 to 0.5 microg/ml, respectively. When agar dilution was used as the reference method, essential agreement was found for 112 of 216 strains (51.9%) for microdilution, 168 of 216 (77.8%) for E test in air, and 132 of 216 (61.1%) for E test in CO(2). With the exception of four strains tested by E test in CO(2), all organisms were susceptible to a proposed telithromycin susceptibility breakpoint of < or =1 microg/ml. By disk diffusion with 15-microg telithromycin disks, all strains but one had zones of inhibition > or =19 mm in diameter when incubated in CO(2), while all strains had zone diameters of > or = 22 mm when incubated in air. Zone diameters in air were generally 4 to 5 mm larger than in CO(2). By all methods, MICs and zones of all erythromycin-resistant strains occurred in clusters separated from those seen with erythromycin-susceptible strains. The results for macrolide-resistant strains with erm and mef resistance determinants were similar. The results show that (i) telithromycin is very active against erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant strains irrespective of macrolide resistance mechanism; (ii) susceptibility to telithromycin can be reliably tested by the agar, microdilution, E test, and disk diffusion methods; and (iii) incubation in CO(2) led to smaller zones by disk diffusion and higher MICs by E test, but at a susceptible MIC breakpoint of < or =1 microg/ml and a susceptible zone diameter cutoff of > or =19 mm in CO(2), 215 of 216 strains were found to be susceptible to telithromycin.