The effectiveness of external beam radiotherapy for acromegaly is not affected by previous pituitary ablative treatments

Thirty-three acromegalic patients were treated with radiotherapy and followed up for at least 3 years (mean 6 years, range 3 to 12). Seventeen had not had previous pituitary ablative therapy and 16 had. The mean GH level for these two groups before radiotherapy was comparable at 98 and 119 mIU/l. The observed frequency of reaching less than 10 mIU/l was 53% and 75% of patients in the two groups, respectively, the mean observed falls in growth hormone level were 81 and 85% of the initial level, and the calculated exponential decline rate of GH level was 72 and 52% per year. Considering all 35 patients, requirement for pituitary hormone replacement therapy increased from 15 patients before radiotherapy to 20 after radiotherapy, being mostly those who had had prior ablative therapies. There were no complications attributable to the radiotherapy treatment. It appears that radiotherapy is equally efficacious whether a prior unsuccessful ablative procedure had been used or not.     

Response of acromegaly to long term bromocriptine therapy: a biochemical and clinical assessment.

The long term effects of bromocriptine in 12 acromegalics treated for a mean duration of 10.2 months are reported. Seven showed a significant (P less than 0.05) and sustained fall in serum immunoreactive growth hormone (GH) levels throughout 24 h, 6 of whom had a 50% or greater reduction in mean circulating GH during glucose tolerance testing. Only one patient had mean serum GH levels throughout the day suppressed to normal (less than 5 mIU/l) but 3 had suppression of mean serum GH during GTT to normal or very near normal (less than 10 mIU/l). The effective dose was 20 mg daily. Only 4 patients reported any improvement in soft tissue swelling and acral features, which was unrelated to the GH response. Possible reasons for the discrepancy between clinical and biochemical responses are discussed. In 9 of the 12 patients bromocriptine was discontinued and pituitary ablative therapy offered. Three out of 4 patients who underwent trans-sphenoidal hypophysectomy had mean GH levels during GTT reduced to less than 7 mIU/l. In the three who continued bromocriptine treatment GH suppression was maintained at less than 10 mIU/l for up to 3 years but with little change in acral features. Although bromocriptine is safe and was well tolerated it is not as effective as existing forms of pituitary ablative therapy and should be reserved for those cases where ablation is contraindicated or unsuccessful.     

EFFECTIVE LONG-TERM TREATMENT OF ACROMEGALY WITH A LONG-ACTING SOMATOSTATIN ANALOGUE (SMS 201–995)

Nine acromegalic patients, six previously untreated, were studied before and after 3-15 months of treatment with a long-acting somatostatin analogue (SMS 201-995; 100 micrograms injected s.c. three times daily). During treatment, the mean (+/- SEM) 24-h GH concentration fell from 82 +/- 22 mIU/l to 33 +/- 7 mIU/l (P less than 0.001), and eight of the 9 patients showed a reduction of at least 50% in GH levels in the fasting state and/or during a glucose tolerance test. There was a significant 30% fall in serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) with SMS. All patients showed rapid clinical improvement, with diminished sweating and headaches, and reduction in skinfold thickness, hand volumes and finger size. Computer tomographic scanning of the pituitary in eight patients showed no change in the size of the pituitary tumour during treatment. The only side-effects of SMS noted were transient abdominal discomfort and loose stools in two patients on initiating therapy. Although fasting plasma glucose concentration did not change during treatment (5.4 +/- 0.3 vs 5.5 +/- 0.3 mmol/l), mean 24-h plasma glucose concentration was higher with SMS (6.6 +/- 0.5 mmol/l vs 6.0 +/- 0.4 mmol/l; P less than 0.02). Mean 24-h plasma insulin concentration fell from 87 +/- 11 mIU/l before treatment to 39 +/- 6 mIU/l during treatment (P less than 0.005). No change in other anterior pituitary hormones was observed. SMS appears to be a safe, rapidly effective, long-term treatment for certain patients with acromegaly.     

Efficacy of radiotherapy in normalizing serum IGF-I, acid-labile subunit (ALS) and IGFBP-3 levels in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE: Radiotherapy (RT) has been used for many years in order to complete the cure of unsuccessfully operated acromegalic patients. Several studies have shown its efficacy in normalizing GH levels, while reports about IGF-I normalization are conflicting. Moreover, data regarding other markers of disease activity, such as IGFBP-3 and acid-labile subunit (ALS), i.e. the other two components of the circulating 150 kDa complex, are lacking. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Sixty-seven acromegalic patients (20 males and 47 females, aged 40 +/- 6 years) who underwent postoperative RT (in fractionated doses for a total of 40-75 Gy) were followed-up for 11 +/- 6 years (range: 1-26 years, median: 10 years). Serum GH and IGF-I levels off medical therapy were measured in all patients; ALS and IGFBP-3 were measured in 11 patients with normalization of IGF-I concentrations. Computed tomography or nuclear magnetic resonance imaging periodically assessed possible development of pituitary deficiency along with imaging of the hypothalamic-pituitary region. RESULTS: Forty-one out of 67 patients (58%) achieved GH levels < 2.5 microg/l by 1-15 years after RT (mean 8 +/- 6) and 37/67 patients (55%) had normal or low IGF-I levels 1-26 years after RT (mean: 12 +/- 6), a normalization of both parameters being seen in 37 patients. GH < 2.5 microg/l and normal IGF-I levels were achieved in 17/26 (65%) patients followed-up for at least 15 years. ALS and IGFBP-3 concentrations paralleled IGF-I levels in all patients studied. With respect to secondary pituitary insufficiency, acquired ACTH deficiency was found in 25 patients, TSH deficiency in 20, gonadotropin deficiency in 23 and GH deficiency in seven. In total, two cases of meningioma and one pineal tumour, possibly related to RT, were seen 9-22 years after RT. CONCLUSIONS: RT is an effective, although slow-acting, therapeutic tool for acromegaly, with 'safe' GH levels and normal IGF-I concentrations being achieved in 65% of patients after 15 years. IGF-I levels normalize more slowly than GH levels. Radiotherapy is able to normalize the concentration of all three components of the circulating 150 kDa complex. Checks for loss of pituitary function and appearance of second brain tumours must be carried out life-long.     

Clinical and biochemical response following withdrawal of a long-acting, depot injection form of octreotide (Sandostatin-LAR®)

OBJECTIVE: Monthly injections of Sandostatin-LAR have been shown to be an effective therapy for patients with acromegaly. Because of an ongoing need to assess a patients response to definitive therapy such as surgery and/or radiotherapy, we aimed to evaluate GH levels and acromegaly symptom scores in patients withdrawing from Sandostatin-LAR. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: 12 patients with acromegaly previously treated with Sandostatin-LAR, 20-40 mg intramuscularly every 28 (n = 9) or 42 (n = 3) days for 12-36 months were studied at monthly intervals for 4 months following the withdrawal of the drug. MEASUREMENTS: Hourly fasting serum GH measurements between 0800 h and 1200 h, serum IGF-1 and symptom scores were undertaken at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks following the last injection of Sandostatin-LAR. MRI/CT scans of the pituitary were undertaken at 16 weeks and compared to scans taken on Sandostatin-LAR within the previous 10 months. RESULTS: Serum GH rose progressively from 7.7 (1.5 to 14.6) (median (range)) mIU/l at 4 weeks to 9.9 (1.5-21.8), to 12.6 (4.9-31.9) (P < 0.05 vs 4 weeks) and to 13.1 (6.0-39.1) mIU/l (P < 0.002) at 8, 12 and 16 weeks, respectively, following cessation of Sandostatin-LAR. IGF-1 rose from 38.5 (12.6-73.8) nmol/l at 4 weeks to 62.4 (37.4-159) at 16 weeks (P < 0.002) and mean symptom score (comprising headache, sweating, arthralgia, paraesthesiae, tiredness) from 4.0 (0 to 10) (4 weeks) to 4.5 (0-9) (8 weeks) to 6.0 (2-10) (12 weeks) to 6.5 (4-12) (16 weeks, P < 0.05). Individual GH profiles indicated a rise in GH in 5/12 patients between weeks 4-8 and between weeks 8-12 in a further 5/12 patients. There were no changes in pituitary tumour size following discontinuation of Sandostatin-LAR. CONCLUSIONS: GH and symptom scores rise progressively following discontinuation of Sandostatin-LAR in acromegalic patients. However, GH and symptom scores remain suppressed in some patients for at least 8 weeks following cessation of Sandostatin-LAR. We suggest that a withdrawal period of 3 months from Sandostatin-LAR is required in order to perform a meaningful re-assessment of GH and clinical status.     

Evolving criteria for post-operative biochemical remission of acromegaly: can we achieve a definitive cure? An audit of surgical results on a large series and a review of the literature

Criteria to define the biochemical remission of acromegaly following surgery have changed over the years, and the current use of stringent criteria needs a critical re-evaluation of the surgical results. On the other hand, few data are currently available concerning the possible impact of pituitary surgery on the quality of life of operated acromegalic patients. In this prospective study, we wished to evaluate the initial outcome and long-term recurrence rate in a large series of acromegalic patients operated on by transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), to carefully analyse predictive factors for surgical outcome and to point out possible additional effects of surgery in these patients. Ninety-two out of 98 operated patients could be considered for follow-up. Biochemical remission was strictly defined as plasma GH levels <1 ng/ml during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and normalisation of age-related IGF-I levels. Hormonal assessment, including an OGTT, was performed 6 months following surgery and then annually to evaluate pituitary function. Fifty-five per cent of patients achieved a biochemical remission of acromegaly. The remission rate at 6 months was 80% for patients with microadenoma and 50% for macroadenoma. Univariate analysis showed that a large extrasellar extension, preoperative high GH levels and dural invasion were correlated with a poor outcome of surgery while, according to multivariate analysis, only invasion of cavernous sinus and preoperative GH levels > 10 ng/ml were independent negative predictors. Mortality was 0% and the overall complication rate was about 10%. Pituitary function worsened in five patients but improved in 16 out of 30 patients with preoperative pituitary defects. No recurrence was observed during a median follow-up of about 8 years. We conclude that TSS is able to achieve a biochemical remission in more than half of acromegalic patients, and that the current criteria for remission seem to indicate a cure in most cases.     

The role of prolactin in the inhibitory action of bromocriptine on growth hormone secretion in acromegaly

Bromocriptine treatment results in clinical improvement and inhibition of plasma GH levels in only part of the acromegalic patients. The possible role of the simultaneous presence of Prl and GH in GH-secreting pituitary adenomas was investigated with regard to the inhibitory action of bromocriptine on GH secretion and the paradoxical increase of GH release in reaction to TRH. Surgically obtained pituitary tumour tissue from 35 consecutive acromegalic patients was studied immunohistochemically. In 21 patients no Prl was present in the tumour tissue. These patients had normal plasma Prl levels. In the other 14 patients Prl was present in the tumour tissue. Hyperprolactinaemia was found in 10 of these 14 patient. Plasma GH levels from 2 till 10 h after the administration of 2.5 mg bromocriptine measured before operation were significantly more suppressed in the patients with mixed GH/Prl-containing than in those with pure GH-containing pituitary adenomas, being 38 +/- 4% and 65 +/- 4% of basal values, respectively (P less than 0.01). The response of GH to TRH, however, did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions: 1. In about 70% of patients with 'mixed' GH/Prl containing adenomas, hyperprolactinaemia is present. 2. The simultaneous presence of Prl and GH in a GH-secreting pituitary tumour increases the sensitivity of GH secretion to bromocriptine. 3. The plasma Prl level is of value to predict which patients with acromegaly are likely to respond to bromocriptine with an inhibition of GH secretion.     

继发与不继发糖尿病的肢端肥大症型垂体腺瘤患者的临床比较分析

目的：比较分析继发与不继发糖尿病的肢端肥大症型垂体腺瘤患者的临床资料,初步探讨肢端肥大症垂体腺瘤继发糖尿病的可能病理免疫学机制。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年6月济宁医学院附属医院神经外科采用单鼻孔直达蝶窦入路显微手术切除的84例肢端肥大症垂体腺瘤患者的临床资料,运用免疫化学发光法测定术前基础血生长激素（GH）水平,使用多田公式（xyz／2）计算MRI上肿瘤体积,采用免疫组织化学的方法检测肿瘤内分泌激素的表达,采用χ2或t检验比较继发与不继发糖尿病的肢端肥大症垂体腺瘤患者在发病年龄、性别、发病时间、瘤体大小、基础血GH水平以及肿瘤激素免疫反应等方面的差异。结果20例（24％）肢端肥大症垂体腺瘤患者继发糖尿病。继发和不继发糖尿病的肢端肥大症垂体腺瘤患者男女均可发病（χ2＝1.944,P＝0.163）,发病年龄多集中在41～50岁（P＝0.652）,MRI显示瘤体大小均有微腺瘤、大腺瘤、巨大腺瘤,差异均无统计学意义（P＝1.000）;发病时间分别集中在1～5年（55％）、6～10年（45％）,差异有统计学意义（P＝0.004）;术前基础血GH水平分别为（42.83±8.70）ng／ml、（38.91±36.46）ng／ml,差异有统计学意义（t＝5.253,P＝0.031）。继发糖尿病的肢端肥大症垂体腺瘤患者促甲状腺激素（TSH）免疫反应平均光密度值（0.545±0.023）明显高于不继发糖尿病者（0.408±0.019）,差异有统计学意义（t＝5.336,P＝0.001）;TSH免疫反应阳性率（70％）亦明显高于不继发糖尿病的肢端肥大症患者（14％）,差异有统计学意义（χ2＝23.971,P＝0.000）。结论继发与不继发糖尿病的肢端肥大症垂体腺瘤患者在发病年龄、性别、瘤体大小方面无明显差别,但二者在发病时间、术前基础血GH水平及肿瘤病理免疫反应方面存在明显差别,肿?     

Cabergoline addition to depot somatostatin analogues in resistant acromegalic patients: efficacy and lack of predictive value of prolactin status

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin analogues (SA) are currently the mainstay in the medical treatment of acromegaly. However, even high doses of depot SA for prolonged periods do not achieve GH-IGF-I normalization in some patients. Even though some data were reported about the addition of cabergoline, a long-acting dopamine agonist (DA), to SA in resistant patients, definite data are still lacking. DESIGN: Prospective open trial. PATIENTS: In 19 acromegalic patients with active disease (34-82 years old, seven males, 12 females) resistant to chronic (9-12 months) depot SA (octreotide-LAR, 30 mg/28 days in 13 patients, lanreotide, 60 mg/28 days intramuscularly in six patients) cabergoline was added (combined treatment). In these patients, SA treatment had partially relieved GH and IGF-I hypersecretion but no patient had achieved 'safe' GH and normal IGF-I-values. Eight patients had PRL levels greater than 15 micro g/l (range 16-60 micro g/l; 1 micro g = 21.2 mIU). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was positive for PRL in four out of eight operated patients. RESULTS: The addition of cabergoline, using the minimal effective and the maximal tolerated dose (range 1-3.5 mg/week), decreased GH from 6.6 +/- 0.9 to 4.6 +/- 0.6 micro g/l (P = 0.018), and IGF-I from 552 +/- 44 to 428 +/- 54 micro g/l (P = 0.019) after 6 months (median, range 3-18 Months). Combined treatment decreased GH to < 2.5 micro g/l in four patients (21%) and normalized IGF-I for age in eight patients (42%). It obtained a decline of both GH and IGF-I (-49 +/- 7%, and -47 +/- 5%, respectively) in nine patients (47%), and a partial improvement in six (32%) patients (GH decreased by 43 +/- 8% in four, and IGF-I by 35-38% in two patients). No change was observed in two patients, and worsening in two other patients. Results were not dependent on PRL status (serum levels or IHC). Combined treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of cabergoline to depot SA-resistant acromegalic patients is effective, not dependent on PRL values and normalizes IGF-I levels in 42% of patients. The association of long-acting DA and SA deserves a more relevant role in the therapeutical algorithm of acromegaly.     

Paradoxical growth hormone response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in acromegaly. Clinical correlations and prognostic value

We have investigated the effect of TRH on the release of GH in 20 acromegalic patients (14 females and 6 males) before and after selective removal of a pituitary tumour via transsphenoidal route. The follow-up period was 8 years. Pre-operatively the paradoxical response was present in 15 patients (75%). Mean GH values in TRH responders were significantly lower than in non-responders. According to the size and expansion diffusion of the adenoma, the patients were divided into 3 classes. The percentage of paradoxical response in patients in class III was significantly lower than in the other two classes. Postoperatively, mean GH values in pre-operative TRH responders were significantly lower than in non-responders; among 15 responders, 13 (86%) had postoperative GH levels under 5 micrograms/l; among 5 non-responders only 2 (40%) had GH values under 5 micrograms/l. Postoperatively 8 patients still had GH responsiveness to TRH: 6 with GH levels persistently (follow-up 8 years) under 5 micrograms/l and 2 with elevated GH values. The other 7 patients, who were responders pre-operatively and non-responders postoperatively, persistently exhibited low GH levels, except one subject who showed an increase in GH levels with reappearance of the paradoxical response, two years after surgery. These results suggest: 1. the paradoxical response may be expressed only when the hypothalamus-pituitary interactions are intact; 2. the disappearance of the paradoxical response cannot surely suggest a remission, and 3. the presence of a pre-operative paradoxical response is a good prognostic feature.     

Comparison of octreotide acetate LAR and lanreotide SR in patients with acromegaly

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The most effective option for the medical treatment of patients with acromegaly is the use of somatostatin analogues. Long-acting depot formulations for intramuscular injection of two somatostatin analogues have recently become available: octreotide acetate LAR (Sandostatin LAR, Novartis Pharma AG) and lanreotide SR (Somatuline, Ipsen Biotech). We wished to compare efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR in acromegalic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of 125 patients with acromegaly (67 females; mean age, 47 years; 59 patients had previous pituitary irradiation) from 26 medical centres in France, Spain and Germany were studied. Before the study, all patients had been treated with intramuscular injections of lanreotide SR (mean duration, 26 months) at a dose of 30 mg which was injected every 10 days in 64 and every 14 days in 61 patients, respectively. All patients were switched from lanreotide SR to intramuscular injections of 20 mg of octreotide LAR once monthly for three months. In order to obtain efficacy and safety data of lanreotide SR under study conditions, it was decided to randomly assign at day 1, in a 3 : 1 ratio, the time point of the treatment switch; 27 of the patients were randomly assigned to continue the lanreotide SR treatment for the first 3 months of the study (group A); they were on octreotide LAR 20 mg from month 4-6. The other 98 patients were assigned to be switched to treatment with octreotide LAR 20 mg at day 1 (group B). In group B patients, octreotide LAR treatment was continued until month 6, with an adjustment of the dose based on GH levels obtained at month 3. RESULTS: The mean GH concentration decreased from 9.6 +/- 1.3 mU/l at the last evaluation on lanreotide SR to 6.8 +/- 1.0 mU/l after three injections of octreotide LAR (P < 0.001). The percentages of patients with mean GH values < or = 6.5 mU/l (2.5 microg/l) and < or = 2.6 mU/l (1.0 microg/l) at the last evaluation on lanreotide SR were 54% and 14%, and these values increased after 3 months treatment with octreotide LAR to 68% and 35% (P < 0.001), respectively. IGF-I levels were normal in 48% at the last evaluation on lanreotide SR and in 65% after 3 months on octreotide LAR (P < 0.001). Patients with pre-study pituitary irradiation had lower mean GH and IGF-I concentrations. But the effects of the treatment change did not differ between the irradiated and the nonirradiated patients. In general both drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Octreotide LAR 20 mg administered once monthly was more effective than lanreotide SR 30 mg administered 2 or 3 times monthly in reducing GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly.     

GROWTH HORMONE-RELEASING FACTOR INCREASES SERUM PROLACTIN CONCENTRATIONS IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH PITUITARY ADENOMAS

We have examined the serum growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) response to growth hormone releasing factor (hGRF-(1-44)NH2 (GRF) 1 microgram/kg i.v. bolus) in 16 acromegalic patients (eight of whom were hyperprolactinaemic), 13 patients with microprolactinoma, and 14 healthy subjects. The GH responses to TRH and to the somatostatin analogue SMS 201-995 were also studied in acromegalic patients. In these, and in patients with microprolactinoma, GH responses after GRF (P less than 0.001 vs saline) were variable. The absolute GH increase (calculated as area under the curve) in acromegalic patients (2489 +/- 920 micrograms/l min), or in patients with microprolactinoma (1322 +/- 279 micrograms/l min) was not different from that in controls (2238 +/- 633 micrograms/l min). In addition, a significant increase in PRL release was observed after GRF in comparison to saline in acromegalic patients (P less than 0.01), in patients with microprolactinoma and in normal subjects (P less than 0.001). The PRL increase was significantly correlated with basal PRL levels in acromegalic patients (r = 0.99, P less than 0.001) and in patients with microprolactinomas (r = 0.61, P less than 0.05). Furthermore, a significant correlation was found between GH rise after GRF and basal GH, and between GH rise after GRF and GH decrement after SMS in patients with acromegaly. These results suggest that GRF can stimulate PRL release by actions on the normal pituitary and on pituitary adenomas, including microprolactinomas. Moreover, the data suggest that in acromegaly there is a relative functional deficiency of hypothalamic somatostatin.     

Different responses of growth hormone secretion to guanfacine, bromocriptine, and thyrotropin-releasing hormone in acromegalic patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-containing and mixed GH/prolactin-containing pituitary adenomas

There is great variability in the GH secretory responses to different stimuli in patients with acromegaly. In the present study, we compared the effects on GH secretion of two compounds (bromocriptine and TRH), which presumably act directly at the pituitary level, with the effect of the centrally acting alpha-adrenergic agonist guanfacine in 14 untreated acromegalic patients. These in vivo responses of GH release were correlated with the results of immunocytochemical studies of the pituitary adenomas. In nine patients with pure GH-containing adenomas, GH secretion was suppressed by bromocriptine by more than 50% in one patient, while TRH stimulated GH release by more than 100% in another patient. Guanfacine (2 mg, orally) did not elicit a change in circulating GH levels in any of these nine patients. In the group of five patients with mixed GH/PRL-containing adenomas, however, bromocriptine suppressed GH levels by more than 50% in all patients, and TRH stimulated GH release by more than 100% in four of them. Guanfacine stimulated GH secretion significantly in four of these five patients. Guanfacine inhibited GH secretion significantly in five other acromegalic patients who had been treated 5-10 yr previously by external pituitary irradiation. We conclude that in acromegaly, the presence of PRL within the GH-secreting pituitary adenoma makes GH secretion more sensitive to bromocriptine and TRH, while normal sensitivity to hypothalamus-mediated stimulation (alpha-adrenergic agonist) is retained to some extent. In contrast, pure GH-secreting tumors responded little or not at all to bromocriptine, TRH, or guanfacine.     

The outcome of surgery for acromegaly: the need for a specialist pituitary surgeon for all types of growth hormone (GH) secreting adenoma

OBJECTIVE: Acromegaly is associated with reduced life expectancy, while therapeutic 'cure' (defined by achievement of GH levels < 5 mU/l) is associated with normalization of life expectancy. Surgery remains the treatment of choice but in those in whom operative 'cure' is not achieved, radiotherapy and/or medical treatment are valuable treatment modalities. The chance of subsequent 'cure' with radiotherapy or somatostatin analogue therapy is increased if the post-operative GH level is reduced below 30 mU/l. Using strict criteria for cure and a single dedicated pituitary surgeon, two large European studies reported 'cure' rates of 42% and 56%. In the Manchester region, surgery for these patients has been performed by a number of neurosurgeons, with no specific designated pituitary surgeon dominating the picture. We wished to examine the impact of this surgical strategy on cure rates and the incidence of a post-operative GH level below 30 mU/l. DESIGN: We reviewed the GH results between 1974 and 1997 for every acromegalic who had been referred to the endocrine departments of the two Manchester hospitals responsible for the majority of pituitary disease referrals in Manchester and who had been subsequently referred for pituitary surgery. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Seventy-three (33 male) patients had had GH status assessed before and after surgery by an OGTT or GH profile. The patients were aged between 19 and 70 (mean 43) years at surgery. Seventy-one underwent transsphenoidal and 2 transfrontal surgery. Nine surgeons performed operations. RESULTS: Eighteen (24.7%) had microadenomas and 51 (69.9%) macroadenomas. In 4 patients (5.5%) insufficient data were available to size the adenoma. 17.8% of patients were cured by surgery, 38.8% with microadenomas and 11.8% with macroadenomas. In addition, of 52 patients whose GH levels were > 30 mU/l before surgery, only 27 (51.9%) had GH levels below 30 mU/l post-operatively (81.8% of microadenomas, 43.2% of macroadenomas). CONCLUSION: In comparison with other series, the cure rate in this study is significantly lower. The success in reducing GH levels below 30 mU/l post-operatively is difficult to compare with previously published studies, as few groups have analysed their data in this manner. Nonetheless, of our acromegalic patients with a pretreatment GH level in excess of 30 mU/l, nearly 50% have similar GH status postoperatively, thereby rendering them less amenable to cure by alternative therapeutic modalities. This highlights the importance of a specialist pituitary surgeon, not only for GH secreting microadenomas but also for GH secreting macroadenomas. If these patients are not 'cured', the cost of continuing therapy becomes a significant burden on health-care costs. In addition, if the postoperative GH levels remain above 30 mU/l the chances of achieving adequate control of GH levels are greatly reduced, thereby increasing mortality rates as well as morbidity in these patients.     

Acromegalic features in growth hormone (GH)-deficient patients after long-term GH therapy

BACKGROUND: Craniofacial, hand, foot and somatic growth depend on normal GH secretion. Acromegalic features have been described in children with GH insensitivity after IGF-I treatment. We observed patients with acromegalic features such as increase of foot size, nose and jaw enlargement among our cases with GH deficiency, treated with standard recombinant (rh)GH doses. The aim of our study was to analyse the possible factors involved in the development of acromegalic features in these patients. PATIENTS: We evaluated 21 patients, 17 with combined pituitary hormone deficiency and four with isolated GH deficiency treated with rhGH (0.05-0.15 U/kg/day, sc, at night) for 2-12 years who achieved final height. IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were measured before and every 6 months during therapy and bone age was evaluated yearly. At the end of therapy, patients' hand and foot sizes and height were measured and plotted on nomograms for hand according to height and age, and foot size according to height. Lateral radiographs of the face were performed to obtain the linear measurement of the lower jaw length. RESULTS: Foot size was greater than 97th percentile in 8/21 patients and lower jaw length was greater than +2SD in 4/21 patients. Patients were classified in two groups: group 1 (with foot size greater than 97th percentile and/or lower jaw length greater than +2SD) consisted of 11 patients (six females); nine had combined pituitary hormone deficiency (six associated to hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism) and three had isolated GH deficiency; group 2 (with foot size smaller than 97th percentile and lower jaw length less than +2SD) consisted of 10 patients (seven boys); nine had combined pituitary hormone deficiency (six associated to hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism) and one with isolated GH deficiency. During treatment, IGF-I levels ranged from < or = 3 to +2SD and IGFBP-3 levels ranged from -3 to +2SD, in both groups. We observed no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding chronological age, bone age, height at the beginning and at the end of therapy, pubertal development, duration of rhGH treatment and IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels (P > 0.05). Foot size percentile exceeded final height percentile in 11/21 patients (seven girls). CONCLUSION: Long-term rhGH treatment with standard doses might be associated with acromegalic features (increased foot size and lower jaw measurements) in patients with GH deficiency who achieved final height, especially in girls. Neither the clinical nor the hormonal parameters, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels, were useful to predict the development of these features. Further studies are necessary to analyse the frequency of this side-effect and how to prevent it.     

Circadian variations in serum levels of LH, FSH, estradiol, testosterone and sex hormone binding globulin in acromegalic women with menstrual disturbances before and after transsphenoidal adenectomy

Day/night profiles of serum GH, PRL, IGF-I, LH, FSH, testosterone (TT and FT), estradiol (E2) and SHBG were estimated in 12 acromegalic women with GH- and PRL-producing pituitary adenomas and 13 patients with GH-secreting pituitary tumors before and 3 months after transsphenoidal adenectomy. All the subjects studied have had irregular menstrual cycles. Blood for profile determinations was drawn from a peripheral vein at 3 h intervals for three 24 h periods (starting at 08.00). Before surgery all acromegalic women had high mean 24 h GH and IGF-I levels (with irregular peaks) even in the absence of hyperprolactinemia. Postoperative mean 24 h GH level was still high only in 5 out of 25 women studied, and that of IGF-I in 10 of these patients. In 12 acromegalic women with preoperative hyperprolactinemia and disturbed 24 h fluctuations postoperative 24 h mean level of PRL and its circadian rhythm were normal. Before surgery, the circadian variations of pituitary-sex hormone levels and SHBG capacity in serum were not impaired. However, mean 24 h levels of LH, FSH, TT, FT E2 and SHBG were altered mainly in patients with mixed type of GH and PRL producing adenomas. This may be related to the increased activity of GH/IGF-I axis on the one hand and to the excess of PRL on the other. The postoperative normalization of pituitary-sex hormone levels and SHBG capacity in serum was noted only in women with normal 24 h circadian variations of IGF-I levels.     

RADIATION-INDUCED HYPERPROLACTINAEMIA IN A TREATED ACROMEGALIC

A 31-year-old acromegalic was normoprolactinaemic after partial removal of her pituitary tumour. The post-operative external pituitary irradiation lowered the mean growth hormone (GH) level from 75 mU/1 to less than 1 mU/1 within 2 years. However, at the same time hyperprolactinaemia developed. These changes in the GH and prolactin levels were confirmed 3 and 4 years after irradiation. The cause of the hyperprolactinaemia was radiation-induced hypothalamic damage. Therefore it is suggested that similar damage may occur in patients receiving external pituitary irradiation for 'prolactinomas' and that this mechanism may contribute to the persistent hyperprolactinaemia observed in such patients.     

Secretion of growth hormone-releasing hormone in patients with idiopathic pituitary dwarfism and acromegaly

The plasma levels of immunoreactive-GHRH in patients with idiopathic pituitary dwarfism and acromegaly were studied in the basal state and during various tests by a sensitive and specific RIA. The fasting plasma GHRH level in 22 patients with idiopathic pituitary dwarfism was 6.3 +/- 2.3 ng/l (mean +/- SD), which was significantly lower than that in normal children (9.8 +/- 2.8 ng/l, N = 21), and eight of them had undetectable concentrations (less than 4.0 ng/l). Little or no response of plasma GHRH to oral administration of L-dopa was observed in 7 of 10 pituitary dwarfs, and 3 of the 7 patients showed a response of plasma GH to iv administration of GHRH (1 microgram/kg). These findings suggest that one of the causes of idiopathic pituitary dwarfism is insufficient GHRH release from the hypothalamus. The fasting plasma GHRH level in 14 patients with acromegaly and one patient with gigantism was 8.0 +/- 3.9 ng/l, which was slightly lower than that in normal adults (10.4 +/- 4.1 ng/l, N = 72). One acromegalic patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I had a high level of plasma GHRH (270 ng/l) with no change in response to L-dopa and TRH test. In 3 untreated patients with acromegaly L-dopa did not induce any response of plasma GHRH in spite of inconsistent GH release, and in 4 patients with acromegaly, TRH evoked no response of plasma GHRH in spite of a marked GH release, suggesting that the GH responses are not mediated by hypothalamic GHRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 induces long-acting inhibition of growth hormone secretion without rebound hypersecretion in acromegalic patients

The acute effect of the somatostatin analog SMS 201-995 (SMS) was investigated in eight acromegalic patients. This substance is an octapeptide [DPhe-Cys-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Cys-Thr-(ol)] that inhibits GH release in experimental animals and man. After a control day, 50 micrograms SMS were injected sc, and plasma GH and insulin and blood glucose levels were measured at multiple intervals for 24 h. GH significantly (P less than 0.001) decreased in seven of eight acromegalic patients from 30 +/- 5 (+/- SE) to an average of 10.7 +/- 4 micrograms/l from 1-10 h after drug administration. No rebound effect occurred. Postprandial blood glucose levels were significantly (P less than 0.01) higher between 2 and 4 h after SMS treatment compared with control day values, and there was a substantial reduction in insulin secretion, as estimated by the area under the curve (P less than 0.01), during the first 3 h after SMS administration. Circulating GH was not altered by SMS or the dopamine agonist mesulergine in one patient, but the combination of both substances (50 micrograms SMS, sc, and 0.5 mg mesulergine, orally) reduced GH to below 50% of basal. In vitro studies showed that 1 PM, 0.1 nM, and 10 nM SMS or natural somatostatin exerted a similar inhibitory effect (12-39% reduction; P less than 0.01 for all three strengths) on GH release by cultured human pituitary tumor cells. In conclusion, the somatostatin derivative SMS exerts a potent and prolonged inhibitory action on GH secretion and a shorter lasting suppression of insulin in acromegalic patients. Therefore, it may represent a useful tool in the chronic management of this condition.     

Neurosurgery restores late GH rise after glucose-induced suppression in cured acromegalics

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: A decrease of GH levels below 2 microg/l after an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is still currently accepted as the gold standard for assessing cure in surgically treated acromegaly. Whether glucose-induced suppression of GH is accompanied by a restoration of normal GH late rebound has not yet been evaluated in this disease. In order to assess the restoration of normal GH regulation after removal of a pituitary adenoma, we have evaluated GH changes after an OGTT in a series of selected acromegalic patients (transsphenoidal surgery and lack of pituitary failure). METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (13 male, 16 female, age range 27-70 years) entered the study. Their neuroradiological imaging before neurosurgery showed microadenoma in 7, intrasellar macroadenoma in 8 and macroadenoma with extrasellar extension in 14. Plasma GH levels were assayed up to 300 min after glucose administration (75 g p.o.) and IGF-I on basal samples. RESULTS: Basal GH levels were below 5 microg/l in 20 patients and below 2 microg/l in 5 of these. Normal age-adjusted IGF-I levels were observed in 12 patients. GH values were suppressed below 2 microg/l during an OGTT in 13 patients, and below 1 microg/l in 7 of these. In 9 patients out of these 13, a marked rise in GH levels occurred after nadir. Baseline and nadir GH values of these 9 patients were not different from the corresponding values of the other 4 patients without OGTT-induced late GH peaks. CONCLUSIONS: GH rebound after GH nadir occurs in acromegalic patients considered as cured on the basis of OGTT-induced GH suppression and/or IGF-I normalization. The restoration of this physiological response could be regarded as a marker of recovered/preserved integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. Even though the reason for this GH rebound has not yet been elucidated (GHRH discharge?/end of somatostatin inhibition?), the lack of late GH peak in the patients regarded as cured by the usual criteria could be due to injury to the pituitary stalk caused by the adenoma or by surgical manipulation.