Multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: anatomic vs functional assessment in clinical practice.

Non-invasive imaging plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and risk stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD). Several techniques such as stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion imaging have become available to assess cardiac function and myocardial perfusion. With the arrival of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTA), non-invasive imaging of coronary anatomy has also become possible. Studies concerning the diagnostic accuracy have demonstrated a good agreement with conventional coronary angiography resulting in a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 86% and 96%, respectively. The high negative predictive value of 97% renders it particularly useful to rule out the presence of CAD in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood. Moreover, comparative studies have demonstrated that anatomic imaging with CTA may provide information complementary to the traditionally used techniques for functional assessment. From these studies can be derived that only approximately 50% of significant stenoses on CTA are functionally relevant; a large proportion of significant (>50%) lesions on CTA does not result in perfusion abnormalities. Alternatively, many patients with a normal perfusion CTA show considerable atherosclerosis on CTA. Therefore, the combined use of these techniques may enhance the assessment of the presence and extent of CAD. In the future diagnostic algorithms, combining non-invasive anatomic and functional imaging need to be evaluated in large patient populations to establish their efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness. Importantly, these investigations should result in the development of comprehensive guidelines on the use of CTA in clinical practice as well.     

CT Perfusion: Ready for Prime Time

Advancements in computed tomography (CT) technology have revolutionized clinical practice, particularly regarding the noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). The versatility of cardiac CT has rendered multiple applications including assessment of cardiac structure and function, myocardial viability, and coronary anatomy. The merits of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA) have been proven for the detection, and particularly the exclusion, of CAD. However, CTA becomes limited in the presence of significant CAD. Its inability to consistently identify lesion-associated ischemia may necessitate additional radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging (CTP) has emerged as a useful and convenient method to immediately assess myocardial ischemia. In this review, we discuss the current state of CTP including available technology, its performance to date from current literature, and future challenges to this field.     

Prognostic utility of coronary computed tomographic angiography

Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) employing CT scanners of 64-detector rows or greater represents a noninvasive method that enables accurate detection and exclusion of anatomically obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), providing excellent diagnostic information when compared to invasive angiography. There are numerous potential advantages of CCTA beyond simply luminal stenosis assessment including quantification of atherosclerotic plaque volume as well as assessment of plaque composition, extent, location and distribution. In recent years, an array of studies has evaluated the prognostic utility of CCTA findings of CAD for the prediction of major adverse cardiac events, all-cause death and plaque instability. This prognostic information enhances risk stratification and, if properly acted upon, may improve medical therapy and/or behavioral changes that may enhance event-free survival. The goal of the present article is to summarize the current status of the prognostic utility of CCTA findings of CAD.     

Diagnostic Performance of Hybrid Cardiac Imaging Methods for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Stand-Alone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Meta-Analysis

Objectives

The current meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of hybrid cardiac imaging techniques compared with stand-alone coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) for assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of stress testing versus 64-multislice coronary computed tomography angiography in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease diagnosed by coronary angiography

Sixty-four-multislice coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and coronary angiography were performed in 145 patients (mean age 67 +/- 10 years), and stress testing was performed in 47 of these patients to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of coronary CTA and of stress testing in diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with suspected CAD. In 145 patients, coronary CTA had 98% sensitivity, 74% specificity, 90% positive predictive value, and 94% negative predictive value in diagnosing obstructive CAD. In 47 patients, stress testing had 69% sensitivity, 36% specificity, 78% positive predictive value, and 27% negative predictive value for diagnosing obstructive CAD, whereas coronary CTA had 100% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 92% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value for diagnosing obstructive CAD. In conclusion, coronary CTA has better sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than stress testing in diagnosing obstructive CAD.     

Impact of both cardiac-CT and cardiac-MR on the assessment of coronary risk

Today's definition of coronary artery disease (CAD) comprises two forms: obstructive and non-obstructive CAD. The 31-72% chance of a life-threatening event-like a myocardial infarction-with non-obstructive CAD is well documented in numerous studies. The objective in modern strategies of diagnosis and therapy should therefore be expedient identification of patients at high risk for coronary events, who will benefit from a customized therapy. Before initiating diagnostic procedures of CAD, a well defined strategy should be pursued. There are two possible primary objectives: ASSESSMENT OF THE INDIVIDUAL RISK FOR A CORONARY EVENT: Assessment of the individual "absolute" risk for a coronary event is not possible using single traditional risk factors. The individual risk can be estimated by integrating several of the traditional risk factors into a scoring system. These so-called risk scores (e.g. Framingham score and Procam score), however, have been associated with shortcomings: insufficient discrimination of high-risk from low-risk individuals. The calcium score has therefore become increasingly established; this Agatston score is independent of the traditional risk factors, so there is no correlation between Agatston and Procam scores. Today, the calcium score is considered the superior test for identifying individuals at high risk for a coronary event and its use is recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for prevention of cardiovascular diseases. PROOF OR EXCLUSION OF A HEMODYNAMICALLY SIGNIFICANT CORONARY STENOSIS: Another concept is the definitive proof or exclusion of a hemodynamically "significant" coronary narrowing. The probability of an obstructive CAD is traditionally assessed by the type of chest pain, age, gender and stress-ECG. In patients with a low probability of an obstructive CAD, cardiac catheterization is not indicated, whereas in patients with a high probability of a hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis, an invasive strategy should be performed. Since non-invasive coronary angiography (CTA) with cardiac-CT has been shown to provide a high negative predictive value, CTA (with good imaging quality) is suitable for ruling out a significant obstructive CAD in the group at intermediate risk for an obstructive CAD. Another approach could be a functional test to initially prove a relevant, inducible myocardial ischemia: In a large cohort it was shown that patients will only prognostically benefit from revascularization procedures if the ischemic myocardial area is greater than 10%. Therefore, the assessment of the extent of myocardial ischemia is the domain of modern stress imaging tests. Stress-echocardiography and myocardial scintigraphy have almost the same sensitivity (74-80%, 84-90%, respectively) and specificity (84-89%, 77-86%, respectively), which are considerably higher than for stress-ECG. Cardiac MR is most suitable for the assessment of myocardial perfusion, because it traces the first pass dynamics of gadolinium at rest and during stress in reproducible slices at an acceptable spatial and a high temporal resolution without ionizing radiation. Whether the non-invasive coronary angiography with cardiac-CT and the Adenosin-perfusion imaging with cardiac-MR will completely replace diagnostic cardiac catheterization and stress-echocardiography as well as myocardial scintigraphy remains to be evaluated in further studies.     

Utility of stress testing and coronary calcification measurement for detection of coronary artery disease in women

Accurate and safe diagnostic testing provides the crucial link between detection and optimal management of coronary artery disease (CAD). Noninvasive diagnostic testing for CAD may be less accurate in women than in men. Many noninvasive diagnostic modalities are available for this purpose. An exercise tolerance test provides an assessment of functional capacity and has the advantages of wide availability and low initial cost. However, exercise echocardiography may be the most cost-effective method for the initial assessment of coronary artery disease in intermediate-risk women owing to its higher sensitivity and specificity. Recent studies with electron-beam computed tomography reveal that women with no coronary calcification are very unlikely to have obstructive CAD. In symptomatic women with an intermediate likelihood of CAD, either an exercise treadmill test or exercise echocardiography is appropriate for initial screening and can provide useful prognostic information. Alternatively, an electron-beam computed tomographic scan with a 0 calcium score may spare many women with atypical chest pain or equivocal findings on an exercise tolerance test from undergoing more expensive stress imaging studies or coronary angiography. For high-risk symptomatic women, a more aggressive approach involving coronary angiography appears to be the preferred initial diagnostic strategy.     

Prognostic value of coronary CT angiography

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a highly accurate noninvasive test that is increasingly used in symptomatic patients primarily for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). Beyond its proven accuracy, data have now clearly demonstrated the incremental prognostic information available from coronary CTA related to the presence, extent, and severity of obstructive and nonobstructive CAD across a variety of clinical settings and patient populations. Current evidence supports the use of coronary CTA not only for the diagnosis of CAD in appropriately selected symptomatic patients but also to further refine their cardiovascular risk assessment following testing.     

Influence of coronary computed tomographic angiography on patient treatment and prognosis in patients with suspected stable angina pectoris

We evaluated the influence of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) as a first-line diagnostic test on patient treatment and prognosis. A total of 1,055 consecutive patients with suspected stable angina pectoris (mean age 55 ± 10 years, 56% women) and a low to intermediate pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) were included in the present study. The patients were followed for a median of 18 months. The use of downstream diagnostic testing and medical therapy after CTA were recorded. The CTA result was normal in 49%, and nonobstructive and obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) was demonstrated in 31% and 15% of the patients, respectively. Coronary CTA was inconclusive in 5% of the patients. The use of antiplatelet therapy decreased with normal findings from CTA, and the use of antiplatelet and lipid-lowering agents increased in patients with CAD. Additional testing was performed in 2% of patients with normal CTA findings and in 7% and 82% of patients with nonobstructive or obstructive CAD, respectively. No patients without CAD, 0.9% of patients with nonobstructive CAD, and 1.9% of patients with obstructive CAD met the primary end point (cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction, p = 0.008). No patients without CAD, 1.5% of patients with nonobstructive CAD, and 30% patients with obstructive CAD met the secondary end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization, p <0.0001). In conclusion, in patients suspected of having angina, the findings from CTA influence patient treatment without resulting in excessive additional testing. Coronary CTA provides important prognostic information, with excellent intermediate-term outcomes in patients with normal CTA findings.     

Coronary CT Angiography as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool: Perspective from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: PROMISE

The PROMISE (Prospective multicenter imaging study for evaluation of chest pain) trial compared the effectiveness of coronary CT angiography and functional testing as initial diagnostic test for patients with suspicion for stable coronary artery disease (CAD). With 10,003 patients randomized at 193 sites, the PROMISE trial provides a snapshot of real-world care for this very common presentation. Over a median follow-up of 25 months, PROMISE did not find significant differences in major clinical events (composite endpoint 164 vs. 151, HR 1.04 (0.83–1.29); p?=?0.75) between the two strategies. Other major findings were the large discrepancy between estimates of pre-test likelihood and observed prevalence for obstructive CAD (≥50 %) and the proportion of noninvasive tests positive for ischemia or obstructive CAD (53 vs. 11 %; respectively) and the better efficiency of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) to select patients for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) who had obstructive CAD (72 vs. 48 % for coronary CTA and functional testing, respectively). Radiation exposure was higher in the CT arm compared to all functional testing but lower than for nuclear perfusion stress testing. Improvement of patient selection for diagnostic testing and risk stratification will be keys to increase efficacy and efficiency of management of patients with suspicion for stable CAD.     

Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET

BackgroundGuidelines recommend verification of myocardial ischemia by selective second-line myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) following a coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Head-to-head data on the diagnostic performance of different MPI modalities in this setting are sparse.ObjectivesThe authors sought to compare, head-to-head, the diagnostic performance of selective MPI by 3.0-T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and ⁸²rubidium positron emission tomography (RbPET) in patients with suspected obstructive stenosis at coronary CTA using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference.MethodsConsecutive patients (n = 1,732, mean age: 59.1 ± 9.5 years, 57.2% men) referred for coronary CTA with symptoms suggestive of obstructive CAD were included. Patients with suspected stenosis were referred for both CMR and RbPET and subsequently ICA. Obstructive CAD was defined as FFR ≤0.80 or >90% diameter stenosis by visual assessment.ResultsIn total, 445 patients had suspected stenosis on coronary CTA. Of these, 372 patients completed both CMR, RbPET and subsequent ICA with FFR. Hemodynamically obstructive CAD was identified in 164 of 372 (44.1%) patients. Sensitivities for CMR and RbPET were 59% (95% CI: 51%-67%) and 64% (95% CI: 56%-71%); P = 0.21, respectively, and specificities 84% (95% CI: 78%-89%) and 89% (95% CI: 84%-93%]); P = 0.08, respectively. Overall accuracy was higher for RbPET compared with CMR (73% vs 78%; P = 0.03).ConclusionsIn patients with suspected obstructive stenosis at coronary CTA, CMR, and RbPET show similar and moderate sensitivities but high specificities compared with ICA with FFR. This patient group represents a diagnostic challenge with frequent mismatch between advanced MPI tests and invasive measurements. (Danish Study of Non-Invasive Diagnostic Testing in Coronary Artery Disease 2 [Dan-NICAD 2]; NCT03481712)     

Coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with stable coronary artery disease

The treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), which is defined by stable anatomical atherosclerotic and functional alterations of epicardial vessels or microcirculation, focuses on managing intermittent angina symptoms and preventing major adverse cardiovascular events with optimal medical therapy. When patients with known CAD present with angina and no acute coronary syndrome, they have historically been evaluated with a variety of noninvasive stress tests that utilize electrocardiography, radionuclide scintigraphy, echocardiography, or magnetic resonance imaging for determining the presence and extent of inducible myocardial ischemia. Patient event-free survival, however, is largely driven by the coronary atherosclerotic disease burden, which is not directly assessed by functional testing. Direct evaluation of coronary atherosclerotic disease by coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) has emerged as the first line noninvasive imaging modality as it improves diagnostic accuracy and positively influences clinical management. Compared to functional assessment of CAD, coronary CTA-guided management results in improved patient outcomes by facilitating prevention of myocardial infarction. Other strengths of coronary CTA include detailed atherosclerotic plaque characterization and the ability to assess functional significance of specific lesions, which may further improve risk assessment and prognosis and lead to more appropriate referrals for additional testing, such as invasive coronary angiography.     

Myocardial perfusion by CT versus hybrid imaging

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a reliable diagnostic test for the anatomic diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Although coronary CTA shows high sensitivity and negative predictive value for detecting stenosis greater than or equal to 50% diameter, it is limited in its ability to diagnose myocardial ischemia. Advances in computed tomography (CT) technology alone and technology that hybridizes CT with single-photon emission CT and positron emission tomography allow for the combined anatomic and physiologic diagnosis of CAD. This article summarizes these combined technologies, emphasizing the merits and limitations of each technology and their clinical implications.     

多层螺旋CT在冠状动脉疾病诊断中的应用

冠心病是严重影响人类健康的一种常见的重大疾病。在临床症状出现之前及早诊断冠状动脉疾病有着重要的意义。尽管常规冠状动脉造影术仍然是诊断冠心病的“金标准” ,但一些其它非介入技术的应用具有代替常规冠脉造影术的潜在可能性。这样 ,冠状动脉疾病的非介入诊断成为当今医学关心的问题。新一代的多层螺旋CT具有高的分辨率 ,可以对心脏及冠状动脉进行显像评价。它不仅可以直接检测冠脉管腔狭窄 ,而且可以检测冠脉粥样硬化斑块。虽然由于冠脉运动尤其是右冠和回旋支中、远段造成的伪影 ,限制了MSCT的应用 ,但在获得足够的冠脉显像质量的情况下 ,多层螺旋CT冠脉管腔显像诊断明确狭窄的敏感性及特异性达 90 %左右。近几年来 ,CT技术的进步和显像质量的提高为冠脉显像诊断提供了日益增加的临床价值。另一方面 ,多层螺旋CT通过对冠脉钙化的评价 ,进行冠脉斑块负荷的测量 ,可评价、预测心血管病的危险性。通过钙化斑块负荷和造影剂管腔显像结合可增加诊断的准确性。总之 ,MSCT作为评价冠状动脉疾病的非介入方法正在快速发展 ,将来可能成为一种有前途的诊断方法。     

16排螺旋CT评估冠状动脉病变的临床价值

目的:探讨16排螺旋CT对冠状动脉病变评估的临床价值。方法:对 40例冠心病病人进行16排螺旋CT冠状动脉造影(CTA)并和常规冠状动脉造影 (CAG)结果进行比较。结果:CTA能显示所有主要的冠状动脉分支及节段,以 CAG为金标准,CTA发现76支主干支有病变,其中67支病变部位与CAG一致;75 支畅通程度一致。118个节段血管有病变,其中96段病变部位与CAG一致;321段畅通程度一致。CTA检查冠状动脉主干支的敏感性为84．8％,特异性为89．3％,阳性预测值(PPVS)为88．2％,阴性预测值(NPVS)为86．2％。结论:CTA是诊断冠状动脉病变较可靠的无创检查方法。     

Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

BackgroundSeverity and extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) assessed by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) guide treatment and may predict clinical outcome in patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS).ObjectivesThis study tested the hypothesis that coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is equivalent to ICA for risk assessment in patients with NSTEACS.MethodsThe VERDICT (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes) trial evaluated timing of treatment in relation to outcome in patients with NSTEACS and included a clinically blinded coronary CTA conducted prior to ICA. Severity of CAD was defined as obstructive (coronary stenosis ≥50%) or nonobstructive. Extent of CAD was defined as high risk (obstructive left main or proximal left anterior descending artery stenosis and/or multivessel disease) or non–high risk. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction, hospital admission for refractory myocardial ischemia, or heart failure.ResultsCoronary CTA and ICA were conducted in 978 patients. During a median follow-up time of 4.2 years (interquartile range: 2.7 to 5.5 years), the primary endpoint occurred in 208 patients (21.3%). The rate of the primary endpoint was up to 1.7-fold higher in patients with obstructive CAD compared with in patients with nonobstructive CAD as defined by coronary CTA (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22 to 2.49; p = 0.002) or ICA (HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.11; p = 0.007). In patients with high-risk CAD, the rate of the primary endpoint was 1.5-fold higher compared with the rate in those with non–high-risk CAD as defined by coronary CTA (HR: 1.56; 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.07; p = 0.002). A similar trend was noted for ICA (HR: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.69; p = 0.07).ConclusionsCoronary CTA is equivalent to ICA for the assessment of long-term risk in patients with NSTEACS. (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes [VERDICT]; NCT02061891)     

A Computed Tomography Protocol to Evaluate Coronary Artery Disease Before Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) computed tomographic angiography (CTA) images can be used to evaluate coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive TAVR patients from November 2019 to February 2021 to evaluate TAVR CTA assessment of CAD on the rate of pre-TAVR invasive angiography. Patients had CTA first or invasive angiography first at the discretion of their treating physicians. TAVR CTA scans were categorised as normal/mild CAD, single-vessel disease, high risk (multivessel or left main disease), or nondiagnostic in patients without previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and as low risk or high risk in patients with previous CABG. Invasive angiography was recommended before TAVR for high-risk or nondiagnostic CTA findings.ResultsTAVR was performed on 354 patients; CTA first was performed in 273 and invasive angiography first in 81. Among 231 patients without previous CABG who had CTA first, 22.1% (51/231) had pre-TAVR invasive angiography and 1.3% (3/231) had pre-TAVR revascularisation. Normal/mild CAD or single-vessel disease was found on CTA in 174 patients, of whom 0.5% (1/174) had high-risk disease on invasive angiography. Among 42 patients with previous CABG who had CTA first, 14.3% (6/42) had pre-TAVR invasive angiography and 2.4% (1/42) had pre-TAVR revascularisation.ConclusionTAVR CTA CAD evaluation can avoid pre-TAVR invasive angiography in more than 70% of patients while rarely missing high risk findings. A CTA-first strategy to assess CAD should be considered, especially among patients where conservative management of CAD is preferred.     

Noninvasive diagnostic testing of coronary artery disease in women

Noninvasive diagnostic testing of coronary artery disease (CAD) is widely recognized as an area that is less studied and less accurate with regard to women than to men. Accurate and safe diagnostic testing constitutes the crucial link between early detection and optimal management of CAD. Many noninvasive diagnostic modalities are available to the clinician, including traditional electrocardiography, the relatively novel imaging of echocardiography, the emerging nuclear perfusion technology of electron beam computed tomography, exercise testing, and pharmacologic testing. The most accurate and cost-effective diagnostic method for patients depends on the patients' pretest likelihood of the disease as determined by factors such as sex, age, and cardiovascular risk factors. Noninvasive tests are most useful in the diagnosis of CAD in patients with intermediate pretest likelihood of CAD. Patients with low pretest likelihood of CAD with normal electrocardiograms may benefit from noninvasive tests or a watchful waiting strategy. Patients with a high pretest likelihood of CAD may benefit greatly from direct referral to coronary angiography. Among the noninvasive diagnostic methods, exercise electrocardiography is the most studied and least accurate with regard to women patients. Electrocardiography improves in accuracy when combined with imaging techniques such as echocardiography or nuclear single photon emission computed tomography. Combining data from all studies has shown that exercise echocardiography yields the highest diagnostic accuracy in women among all of the exercise stress tests. Patients who are unable to achieve maximal exercise capacity may undergo pharmacologic testing using dipyridamole or adenosine radionuclide perfusion or dobutamine echocardiography. Recent development of electron beam computed tomography accurately detects coronary artery calcium but has not been validated yet as a standard diagnostic test for CAD.     

Assessment of coronary artery disease using coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with aortic valve stenosis referred for surgical aortic valve replacement

Background

In patients referred for aortic valve replacement (AVR) a pre-surgical assessment of coronary artery disease is mandatory to determine the possible need for additional coronary artery bypass grafting. The diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (coronary CTA) was evaluated in patients with aortic valve stenosis referred for surgical AVR.

Methods

Between March 2008 and March 2010 a total of 181 consecutive patients were included. All patients underwent pre-surgical coronary CTA (64- or 320-detector CT scanner) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The analyses were performed blinded to each other.

Results

The mean ± SD age of the included patients was 71 ± 9 years and 59% were male. The prevalence of significant coronary artery stenosis > 70% by ICA was 36%. Average heart rate during coronary CTA was 65 ± 16 bpm. In a patient based analysis 94% of the patients (171/181) were considered fully evaluable. Coronary CTA had a sensitivity of 68%, a specificity of 91%, a positive predictive value of 81%, and a negative predictive value of 83%. Advanced age, obstructive lung disease, NYHA function class III/IV, and high Agatston score were found to be significantly associated with disagreement between ICA and coronary CTA in univariate analysis.

Conclusion

In patients with aortic valve stenosis referred for surgical AVR the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA to identify significant coronary artery disease is moderate. Coronary CTA may be used successfully in a subset of patients with low age, no chronic obstructive lung disease, NYHA function class < III and low coronary Agatston score.     

The Prognostic Value of CAC Zero Among Individuals Presenting With Chest Pain: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundThere is little consensus on whether absence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) can identify patients with chest pain (CP) who can safely avoid additional downstream testing.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the utility of CAC assessment for ruling out obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) among patients with stable and acute CP, at low-to-intermediate risk of obstructive CAD undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).MethodsThe authors searched online databases for studies published between 2005 and 2021 examining the relationship between CAC and obstructive CAD (≥50% coronary luminal narrowing) on coronary CTA among patients with stable and acute CP.ResultsIn this review, the authors included 19 papers comprising 79,903 patients with stable CP and 13 papers including 12,376 patients with acute CP undergoing simultaneous CAC and coronary CTA assessment. Overall, 45% (95% CI: 40%-50%) of patients with stable CP and 58% (95% CI: 50%-66%) of patients with acute CP had CAC = 0. The negative predictive values for CAC = 0 ruling out obstructive CAD were 97% (95% CI: 96%-98%) and 98% (95% CI: 96%-99%) among patients with stable and acute CP, respectively. Additionally, the prevalence of nonobstructive CAD among those with CAC = 0 was 13% (95% CI: 10%-16%) among those with stable CP and 9% (95% CI: 5%-13%) among those with acute CP. A CAC score of zero predicted a low incidence of major adverse cardiac events among patients with stable CP (0.5% annual event rate) and acute CP (0.8% overall event rate).ConclusionsAmong over 92,000 patients with stable or acute CP, the absence of CAC was associated with a very low prevalence of obstructive CAD, a low prevalence of nonobstructive CAD, and a low annualized risk of major adverse cardiac events. These findings support the role of CAC = 0 in a value-based health care delivery model as a “gatekeeper” for more advanced imaging among patients presenting with CP.