Extracranial metastatic patterns on occurrence of brain metastases

Extracranial metastases and their frequency by sites have been described as prognostic factors for survival of patients with brain metastasis. However, these factors must be identified and described in more detail for a large series of patients. Using routine data from the largest German health insurance fund, 5,074 patients with brain metastasis who were diagnosed and treated in 2008 were analyzed to identify the frequency and distribution of extracranial metastatic sites concurrent with brain metastasis in relation to age, gender, and tumor type. Brain metastases were observed in males more frequently than in females (56.4 and 43.6% respectively P < 0.001), and were most often from lung (51.2%), breast (12.3%), and unknown (7.5%) primaries. Extracranial metastatic sites were observed in 58.8% of patients; the number of sites was from 1 to 7, with a mean of 1.11. For the 16 most common primary sites the range was from 0.13 to 1.91 . In 11 of these 16 sites, lungs were the most common concurrent metastatic site. Lung cancer, breast cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and testicular cancer most commonly metastasized to bone, and bladder cancer to kidneys. Different primary tumors have different frequencies and patterns of extracranial metastatic sites concurrently with brain metastasis. The lung is the most common metastatic site of most primary tumors, bone for a few tumors, and kidneys for bladder cancer. For the unknown primary tumor type, screening for these most common metastatic sites must be intensified, in particular when molecular assessment is not available.     

Management of metastatic melanoma patients with brain metastases

Brain metastases seem to be an almost inevitable complication in patients with metastatic melanoma. Except for the rare patients who can undergo successful surgical resection of brain metastases, current management strategies do not appear adequate and result in a poor outcome (median survival, 2–4 months). In recent small series, stereotactic radiosurgery or gamma-knife treatment has suggested improvement in local control compared with whole brain radiation therapy. We have recently shown prolonged survival (11.1 months) using a multimodality treatment approach in 44 sequential patients with melanoma brain metastases. A subsequent study demonstrated that the outcome of biochemotherapy for metastatic melanoma is not affected by the presence or absence of brain metastases. Our results suggest that the outcome of patients with melanoma brain metastases can be improved using a multidisciplinary management strategy.     

Multimodality management of brain metastases in metastatic melanoma patients

Brain metastases are a frequent complication of advanced melanoma. Neurosurgery (generally followed by radiotherapy) may be useful in managing solitary, superficial brain metastases in good performance status patients, as well as for diagnostic purposes. Since most patients are not felt to be resectable and concurrent extracranial metastases frequently are present, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has become the de facto treatment standard. WBRT has resulted in disappointing outcomes, resulting in a 3.6-4.1-month median survival. Recent studies have suggested that focal irradiation using linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery or gamma-knife technologies can result in excellent local control and prolonged survival in some patients. It is possible that more aggressive combined modality treatment strategies, such as addition of systemic therapy, may further improve outcome. Current data suggest that aggressive treatment of patients with up to five brain melanoma brain metastases is capable of producing prolonged survival in many patients, including some long-term complete responses.     

Invasion patterns in brain metastases of solid cancers

Background

Brain metastases are generally considered to be well demarcated from the surrounding brain parenchyma, although infiltrative growth patterns have been observed. We systemically investigated infiltration patterns and expression of adhesion molecules in a large and well-defined series of autopsy cases of brain metastases.

Methods

Ninety-seven autopsy specimens from 57 brain metastasis patients (primary tumor: 27 lung cancer, 6 breast cancer, 8 melanoma, 2 colorectal cancer, 1 kidney cancer, and 13 other) were evaluated for patterns of invasion into surrounding brain parenchyma. Expression of integrins αv; cytoplasmic β3, αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, and αvβ8; and of E and N cadherin were evaluated using immunohistochemistry.

Results

Three main invasion patterns were seen: well-demarcated growth (29/57, 51%), vascular co-option (10/57, 18%), and diffuse infiltration (18/57, 32%). There was no statistically significant association of invasion pattern with primary tumor type, although vascular co-option was most common in melanoma brain metastases (4/10). Invasion patterns of different brain metastases of the same patient were highly concordant (P < .001, chi-square test). Distance of infiltration from the main tumor mass ranged from 12.5 µm to 450 µm (median 56.2 µm) and was not significantly different between the vascular co-option and the diffuse infiltration groups. Levels of αvβ6 were significantly higher in the well-demarcated group than in the vascular co-option and the diffuse infiltration groups (P = .033, Kruskal-Wallis test). Expression of αvβ5 in tumor cells was higher in brain metastasis lesions previously treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (P = .034, chi-square test).

Conclusions

Distinct invasion patterns of brain metastases into the brain parenchyma are not specific for primary tumor types, seem to be influenced by expression of αv integrin complexes, and may help to guide clinical decision-making.     

Sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND:

In a broad patient population with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), enrolled in an open‐label, expanded access program (EAP), the safety profile of sunitinib was manageable, and efficacy results were encouraging. Here, the authors report results for patients with baseline brain metastases participating in this global EAP.

METHODS:

Previously treated and treatment‐naive metastatic RCC patients ≥18 years received sunitinib 50 mg orally, once daily, on Schedule 4/2. Safety was assessed regularly, tumor measurements done per local practice, and survival data collected where possible. Analyses were done in the modified intention‐to‐treat (ITT) population, consisting of all patients who received ≥1 dose of sunitinib.

RESULTS:

As of December 2007, 4564 patients had enrolled in 52 countries. Of these enrollees, 4371 were included in the modified ITT population, of whom 321 (7%) had baseline brain metastases and had received a median of 3 treatment cycles (range 1‐25). Reasons for their discontinuation included lack of efficacy (32%) and adverse events (8%). The most common grade 3‐4 treatment‐related adverse events were fatigue and asthenia (both 7%), thrombocytopenia (6%), and neutropenia (5%), the incidence of which were comparable to that for the overall EAP population. Of 213 evaluable patients, 26 (12%) had an objective response. Median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 5.6 months (95% CI, 5.2‐6.1) and 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.8‐10.9), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

In patients with brain metastases from RCC, the safety profile of sunitinib was comparable to that in the general metastatic RCC population, and sunitinib showed evidence of antitumor activity. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Palliative radiotherapy for metastatic malignant melanoma: brain metastases, bone metastases, and spinal cord compression

The records of all patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for malignant melanoma metastatic to brain, to bone, or with spinal cord compression were reviewed. The median survival of 77 patients with brain metastases from the initiation of radiotherapy was 14 weeks. A statistically improved survival was observed only in the 10 patients who underwent subtotal to total resection of a solitary brain metastasis prior to radiotherapy (median = 36 weeks). No improved survival was observed in the 12 patients with a solitary brain metastasis treated by radiotherapy alone (median = 16 weeks). Multivariate analysis revealed that fraction size, total dose, patient age, sex, and duration of the interval between initial diagnosis and appearance of brain metastases did not significantly influence survival, but the use of chemotherapy was associated with a decreased survival. Twenty six patients with symptomatic and radiographic evidence of 39 bone metastases showed a palliative response rate of 85%. 18 of 20 bony lesions treated with high-dose-per-fraction (greater than or equal to 400 cGy) and 15 of 19 bony lesions treated with conventional fractionation (less than or equal to 300 cGy) were palliated. Total dose, patient age, sex, interval between initial diagnosis of malignant melanoma and the appearance of bone metastases, prior or concurrent chemotherapy, or lesion location did not significantly influence palliation. Seventeen patients were identified with symptomatic and myelographic evidence of spinal cord compression. Complete palliation was observed in 47% (8/17) and partial palliation was observed in 24% (4/17). The overall palliation response rate for neurologic symptoms due to spinal cord compression of 71% appeared to be independent of fraction size and total dose.     

Re-irradiation of brain metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression: clinical practice suggestions

The recent improvements of therapeutic approaches in oncology have allowed a certain number of patients with advanced disease to survive much longer than in the past. So, the number of cases with brain metastases and metastatic spinal cord compression has increased, as has the possibility of developing a recurrence in areas of the central nervous system already treated with radiotherapy. Clinicians are reluctant to perform re-irradiation of the brain, because of the risk of severe side effects. The tolerance dose for the brain to a single course of radiotherapy is 50-60 Gy in 2 Gy daily fractions. New metastases appear in 22-73% of the cases after whole brain radiotherapy, but the percentage of reirradiated patients is 3-10%. An accurate selection must be made before giving an indication to re-irradiation. Patients with Karnofsky performance status > 70, age < 65 years, controlled primary and no extracranial metastases are those with the best prognosis. The absence of extracranial disease was the most significant factor in conditioning survival, and maximum tumor diameter was the only variable associated with an increased risk of unacceptable acute and/or chronic neurotoxicity. Re-treatment of brain metastases can be done with whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Most patients had no relevant radiation-induced toxicity after a second course of whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. There are few data on fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in the re-irradiation of brain metastases. In general, the incidence of an "in-field" recurrence of spinal metastasis varies from 2.5-11% of cases and can occur 2-40 months after the first radiotherapy cycle. Radiation-induced myelopathy can occur months or years (6 months-7 years) after radiotherapy, and the pathogenesis remains obscure. Higher radiotherapy doses, larger doses per fraction, and previous exposure to radiation could be associated with a higher probability of developing radiation-induced myelopathy. Experimental data indicate that also the total dose of the first and second radiotherapy, interval to re-treatment, length of the irradiated spinal cord, and age of the treated animals influence the risk of radiation-induced myelopathy. An alpha/beta ratio of 1.9-3 Gy could be generally the reference value for fractionated radiotherapy. However, when fraction sizes are up to 5 Gy, the linear-quadratic equation become a less valid model. The early diagnosis of relapse is crucial in conditioning response to re-treatment.     

激素受体阳性乳腺癌脑转移药物治疗研究进展

目的 乳腺癌是仅次于肺癌最易发生脑转移的原发肿瘤.激素受体阳性乳腺癌是转移性乳腺癌的主体,脑转移是该类患者的主要死亡原因,但目前对于激素受体阳性乳腺癌脑转移(breast cancer brain metastases,BCBM)的有效治疗报道较少.本研究旨探讨激素受体阳性BCBM药物治疗的相关研究进展.方法 应用PubMed及CNKI期刊全文数据库检索系统,以"乳腺癌、脑转移和激素受体阳性乳腺癌"等为,检索2005-01-2016-06相关文献,共检测到中文文献128条,英文文献55条.纳入标准:1)BCBM的危险因素及其预后;2)BCBM的当前治疗选择;3)激素受体阳性BCBM药物治疗.根据纳入标准,符合分析的文献25篇.结果限制BCBM药物治疗进展的主要原因是血脑屏障的存在.激素在BCBM治疗中的疗效尚不明确,但有大量个案报道他莫昔芬等内分泌药物对BCBM治疗有效.非对照试验表明某些细胞毒类药物,如卡培他滨、替莫唑胺(temozolomide,TMZ)和卡莫司汀晶片植入剂,对激素受体阳性BCBM有效,但没有足够证据支持具体的治疗方案.免疫抑制剂abemaciclib在激素受体阳性BCBM患者中的应用正处于Ⅱ期临床试验阶段.虽然高分子药物难以通过完整的血脑屏障,但研究证实部分单克隆抗体,如曲妥珠单抗和贝伐单抗,对BCBM治疗有效.纳米药物传递系统能提高中枢神经系统药物转移,有较好发展前景.由纳米颗粒包裹的多柔比星和etirinotecanpegol对治疗激素受体阳性BCBM有一定的疗效.结论尽管目前没有专门批准用于激素受体阳性BCBM系统治疗的药物,但有大量的临床试验正在进行中,将为临床治疗带来启示.     

Management of patients with brain metastases receiving trastuzumab treatment for metastatic breast cancer

Background: With the more effective control of visceral metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), an increasing number of patients face brain metastases (BM). The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate the incidence and factors affecting the prognosis of patients with BM under trastuzumab treatment for MBC. Patients and Methods: A total of 75 HER2positive patients treated with trastuzumab for MBC were included. Results are discussed in the context of the current literature. Results: Patients who developed BM (n = 29) had longer median progression-free survival (PFS) during first-line chemotherapy and longer overall survival (OS) after diagnosis of MBC than 46 patients without BM (PFS: 27 vs. 14 months, p = 0.039; OS: 46 vs. 18 months, p = 0.067). Median survival of patients with continuation of trastuzumab after diagnosis of BM was longer than survival of patients with discontinuation of trastuzumab treatment after BM (18 vs. 3 months, p = 0.006). Survival of patients who were treated with surgery and radiotherapy for BM was better compared with radiotherapy alone (9 vs. 5 months, p = not significant) or best supportive care (9 vs. 2 months, p = 0.049). Conclusions: Continuation of trastuzumab treatment as well as resection of BM seem to give further benefit in the treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing MBC.     

Biochemotherapy of metastatic melanoma in patients with or without recently diagnosed brain metastases

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases are an alarming complication of advanced melanoma, frequently contributing to patient demise. The authors performed a retrospective analysis to determine whether the treatment of metastatic melanoma with biochemotherapy would result in similar outcomes if brain metastases were first controlled with aggressive, central nervous system (CNS)-directed treatment. METHODS: Seventy melanoma patients were treated with biochemotherapy for metastatic melanoma between 1999 and 2005. Of these, 20 patients had recently diagnosed brain metastases, whereas 50 did not. Brain metastases (if present) were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery >or=28 days prior to systemic therapy. All patients were treated with biochemotherapy consisting of either dacarbazine or temozolomide in combination with a 96-hour continuous intravenous infusion of interleukin-2 and subcutaneous interferon-alpha-2B. The primary endpoint was survival from the time of the initial diagnosis of metastatic disease. RESULTS: Median survival from the time of the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma was 15.8 months for patients with brain metastases and 11.1 months for those without CNS involvement (P = .26 by the log-rank test; P = .075 by the Gehan Wilcoxon test). Dacarbazine-based and temozolomide-based regimens appeared similar with regard to their effect on overall survival and CNS disease progression. A plateau in further brain recurrences was observed in patients who survived for > 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: Data from the current study suggest that the outcome of biochemotherapy is comparable in patients with and those without brain metastases, if brain metastases are controlled with multidisciplinary treatment. Prolonged survival can be achieved in approximately 15% of patients, regardless of whether or not brain metastases are present.     

Macrophage infiltration into experimental brain metastases: occurrence through an intact blood-brain barrier

The purpose of this study was to examine the nature of the blood-brain barrier in experimental brain metastases. Syngeneic fibrosarcoma or melanoma cells were injected into the internal carotid arteries of mice. Several weeks later, once the experimental brain metastases were established, the mice were given injections iv of sodium fluorescein. The capillaries within the metastatic foci were enlarged and irregular, but there was no leakage of sodium fluorescein, showing that the blood-brain barrier was intact. The neoplastic lesions were infiltrated by mononuclear phagocytes, which were identified by immunohistochemical localization of the macrophage-specific antigen F4/80, class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens, and the macrophage product interleukin-1 (IL-1). The metastatic foci contained numerous stellate macrophages that expressed F4/80 and MHC class II antigens, but little IL-1. Round, monocyte-like F4/80 and MHC class II-positive cells were also observed within the tumor lesions and adhering to walls of the tumor microvasculature. Mice with fibrosarcoma brain metastases also had edematous lesions at sites remote from the metastatic foci that contained numerous astrocytes expressing class II MHC but not F4/80 antigens. In conclusion, the blood-brain barrier is intact within experimental brain metastases, yet macrophages of blood monocyte origin can infiltrate the lesions.     

Bevacizumab in the treatment of a patient with metastatic colorectal carcinoma with brain metastases

The development of brain metastases originating from colorectal cancer (CRC) is an infrequent phenomenon occurring in < 5% of patients. Yet, it is feasible that physicians will be diagnosing more patients with brain metastases because of the prolonged survival in our current patient population. The anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab is currently approved in bevacizumab-naive patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC). Initially, precautionary measures regarding the use of bevacizumab were recommended for patients at risk of bleeding based on earlier incidents of intracranial hemorrhage, hemoptysis, and pulmonary hemorrhage. However, recent data support the use of bevacizumab in the treatment of high-grade gliomas. We present a challenging case of a treatment-naive patient with mCRC with brain metastases and the challenges involved in weighing the risks and benefits of systemic chemotherapy when combined with a biologic agent.     

Presentation,patterns of care,and survival in patients with brain metastases

BACKGROUND:

It is largely unknown to what extent new oncologic treatment options have improved survival of patients with brain metastasis in recent decades. Therefore, a multi‐institutional time‐staggered analysis was performed.

METHODS:

Two cohorts of 103 patients each were analyzed, one treated between 2005 and 2009 and the other between 1983 and 1989, ie, approximately 20 years earlier. Stratified analyses by prognostic groups were also performed (graded prognostic assessment [GPA] and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis [RTOG‐RPA]).

RESULTS:

Patterns of care have changed significantly. Contemporary patients received focal treatments such as stereotactic radiosurgery and surgical resection far more frequently. Furthermore, systemic treatment was used more often in contemporary patients, both before and after diagnosis of brain metastasis. Improved survival was observed in the contemporary cohort (P = .03). The 1‐year survival rate increased from 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7%‐25%) to 34% (95% CI, 25%‐44%). However, this improvement was largely driven by patients with favorable prognostic features. More than 40% of the patients still belong to unfavorable prognostic groups with limited median survival and little improvement.

CONCLUSIONS:

Contemporary patients were managed on a much more individualized basis, requiring multidisciplinary case discussion and thorough assessment of prognostic features. Progress has been made, but the overall outcome needs to be improved further. Avoiding overtreatment in patients with poor prognosis is as important as aggressive treatment in patients who might survive for several years. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Vascular gene expression patterns are conserved in primary and metastatic brain tumors

Malignant primary glial and secondary metastatic brain tumors represent distinct pathological entities. Nevertheless, both tumor types induce profound angiogenic responses in the host brain microvasculature that promote tumor growth. We hypothesized that primary and metastatic tumors induce similar microvascular changes that could function as conserved angiogenesis based therapeutic targets. We previously isolated glioma endothelial marker genes (GEMs) that were selectively upregulated in the microvasculature of proliferating glioblastomas. We sought to determine whether these genes were similarly induced in the microvasculature of metastatic brain tumors. RT-PCR and quantitative RT-PCR were used to screen expression levels of 20 candidate GEMs in primary and metastatic clinical brain tumor specimens. Differentially regulated GEMs were further evaluated by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization to localize gene expression using clinical tissue microarrays. Thirteen GEMs were upregulated to a similar degree in both primary and metastatic brain tumors. Most of these genes localize to the cell surface (CXCR7, PV1) or extracellular matrix (COL1A1, COL3A1, COL4A1, COL6A2, MMP14, PXDN) and were selectively expressed by the microvasculature. The shared expression profile between primary and metastatic brain tumors suggests that the molecular pathways driving the angiogenic response are conserved, despite differences in the tumor cells themselves. Anti-angiogenic therapies currently in development for primary brain tumors may prove beneficial for brain metastases and vice versa.     

Extracranial metastases of brain tumors--a case report and survey of patients with extracranial metastasis sampled from a report on pathological autopsy cases in Japan

A 36-year-old man who suffered from recurrence of hemangiopericytoma originating in the cerebellar tentorium and multiple extracranial metastasis over 14 years was reported. Analysis of the 104 cases of extracranial metastasis sampled from the Annual of the Pathological Autopsy Cases in Japan revealed that the frequency of extracranial metastasis is 3.8% of all brain tumors. Extracranial metastasis was frequently found in medulloblastoma, glioblastoma multiforme, malignant meningioma and ependymoma. Organs of frequent metastasis were the lung, bone, liver, pleura, and kidney. Bone metastasis was especially frequent in the vertebra.     

A case of effective paclitaxel therapy for adriamycin resistant metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases

A 36-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of a right breast lump. Chest computed tomography revealed pulmonary metastases with lymphangitis carcinomatosa. Additional examination revealed liver metastases and axillary and cervical lymph node metastases. The patient was started on CA therapy (cyclophosphamide 900 mg, adriamycin 90 mg). A minor response was observed in the pulmonary metastases after two courses but new brain metastases were detected. We then tried paclitaxel administration (260 mg). A partial response was observed in the brain and pulmonary metastases. Thus, paclitaxel administration was continued on a weekly basis (120 mg) and the brain and pulmonary metastases continued to diminish. The primary breast cancer, liver metastases and axillary and cervical lymph node metastases were disappeared. Whole brain radiation was done with weekly paclitaxel administration and the brain metastases were diminished even more. Paclitaxel is as a radiosensitizer and seems to have a strong antineoplastic effect with concurrent radiation.