Healing and relapse rates in gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with the newer proton-pump inhibitors lansoprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole compared with omeprazole, ranitidine, and placebo: evidence from randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND: The older proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole and the newer PPIs lansoprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole are approved for the acute and maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). OBJECTIVE: On the basis of the results of randomized clinical trials, this study sought to estimate healing and relapse rates in acute and maintenance treatment of GERD with the newer PPIs compared with omeprazole, the histamine2-receptor antagonist ranitidine (the most frequent non-PPI comparator in studies of PPIs), and placebo. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE was conducted to identify randomized, controlled clinical trials that included a PPI in > or =1 treatment arm and assessed the healing of erosive esophagitis endoscopically. The primary outcome for studies of acute therapy was healing rate, and the primary outcome for studies of maintenance therapy was relapse rate. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies were identified, of which 38 involved acute therapy (12 excluded) and 15 maintenance therapy. None of the studies of pantoprazole met the inclusion criteria for maintenance therapy. The 8-week overall healing rate ratios in the comparison of newer PPIs with omeprazole 20 mg/d were as follows: lansoprazole 30 mg/d, 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98-1.06): rabeprazole 20 mg/d, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-1.00); and pantoprazole 40 mg/d, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.90-1.07). In the comparison of any PPI with ranitidine 300 mg/d, the ratios were as follows: lansoprazole, 1.62 (95% CI, 1.46-1.76); rabeprazole, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.20-1.54); pantoprazole, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.33-1.96); and omeprazole, 1.58 (95% CI, 1.41-1.78). Relapse rates over 1 year of treatment were similar between lansoprazole and rabeprazole. Compared with ranitidine, there were statistically significant differences in the rates of resolution of heartburn symptoms (P < 0.002), ulcer healing (P < 0.05), and relapse (P < 0.01). Similar results were seen in the comparison of PPIs with placebo in terms of rates of resolution of heartburn symptoms (P < 0.01), ulcer healing (P < 0.001), and relapse (P < 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the newer PPIs were of similar efficacy to omeprazole in terms of heartburn control, healing rates, and relapse rates. All the PPIs were superior to ranitidine and placebo in healing erosive esophagitis and decreasing relapse rates.     

The proton-pump inhibitors: similarities and differences

OBJECTIVE: This paper examines the clinical pharmacology of the proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and briefly reviews some comparative studies of these agents. BACKGROUND: PPIs have emerged as the treatment of choice for acid-related diseases, including gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and peptic ulcer disease. Although these drugs-omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole-share a common structure (all are substituted benzimidazoles) and mode of action (inhibition of H+,K+-adenosine triphosphatase [ATPase]), each differs somewhat in its clinical pharmacology. RESULTS: In comparative clinical trials found in MEDLINE, PPIs administered once daily produced endoscopic evidence of healing in >90% of patients with duodenal ulcer after 4 weeks of treatment, in >90% of those with gastric ulcer after 6 weeks of treatment, and in >90% of those with ulcerative or erosive GERD after 8 weeks of treatment. Maintenance therapy with daily doses of a PPI has been shown to be an effective means of preventing GERD relapse. PPIs also inhibit the growth of Helicobacter pylori, now recognized as an important factor in peptic ulcer disease, and, when administered in combination with antibiotics, provide the best treatment for eradication of the bacterium. Rabeprazole has a more rapid onset of H+,K+-ATPase inhibition than the other PPIs and, compared with omeprazole, a greater effect on intragastric pH after the first dose. Omeprazole and lansoprazole have a greater potential for drug-drug interactions than do pantoprazole and rabeprazole. CONCLUSION: Although the individual PPIs have similar efficacy in many cases, differences between them should be considered when choosing a treatment regimen.     

Lymphocytic Colitis Associated with Lansoprazole Treatment

Introduction: There have been several reported cases of lansoprazole-associated collagenous colitis (CC) reported in the literature but only 1 reported case of lansoprazole-associated lymphocytic colitis (LC) in the literature. Both CC and LC are considered inflammatory bowel diseases, but they are distinctly classified based on the condition of the colon, which is typically confirmed through biopsy.Case summaries: A 52-year-old white male (Patient 1), with a height of 178 cm and weight of 75 kg, presented to Gazi University Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, with a 3-month history of abdominal pain and nonbloody, watery diarrhea. The patient reported receiving PO lansoprazole 30 mg/d to treat heartburn ~1 week prior to the onset of diarrhea. The patient's medical history revealed that he did not have any preexisting conditions, other than gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) for which lansoprazole was prescribed. The medical history report also revealed that the patient was not receiving any concomitant medications or treatments at the time. A colon biopsy confirmed LC. Additionally, a 43-year-old white female (Patient 2), with a height of 168 cm and weight of 61 kg, presented to the same facility with a 6-month history of nonbloody, watery diarrhea and mild lower abdominal cramping. The patient reported that initial onset began ~2 months after receiving a 10-day Helicobacter pylori eradication combination treatment regimen that included lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin, followed by lansoprazole monotherapy to treat GERD. The patient's medical history revealed no other concomitant medications were being adminstered at the time. A colon biopsy confirmed LC.Discussion: A search of the literature using the MEDLINE database and all relevant English-language articles with key words lansoprazole and lymphocytic colitis, found that there were several cases of lansoprazole-associated CC reported and 1 reported case of lansoprazole-associated LC. Histologic findings from laboratory tests and colon biopsies confirmed diagnoses of LC in both patients in this case report. Patient 1 presented with diarrhea and cramping, which the patient reported had been ongoing for ~3 months, following lansoprazole administration. However, after lansoprazole was discontinued, the symptoms completely resolved within 7 days. Patient 2 presented with diarrhea and cramping, which had been occurring for ~6 months. That patient reported that initial onset commenced ~2 months after a 10-day H pylori eradication combination treatment regimen that included lansoprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin, followed by lansoprazole monotherapy to treat GERD. However, after sulfasalazine (3 g/d) was prescribed for 2 months immediately upon diagnosis of LC, there was little improvement in the effort to control the diarrhea in this patient. After omeprazole 20 mg/d was substituted for lansoprazole, the patient's diarrhea ceased. Follow-up sigmoidoscopy 2 months later revealed normal mucosa and complete normalization of histologic findings. The patient remains diarrhea-free while on omeprazole. A causality assessment using the Naranjo adverse reaction algorithm produced scores of 6 for both patients, suggesting that LC was probably associated with lansoprazole treatment.Conclusions: Here we report 2 cases of LC in patients probably associated with the administration of lansoprazole treatment. Complete remission occurred after lansoprazole was discontinued.     

Combination drug therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of combination therapy with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine(2) receptor antagonists in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). DATA SOURCES: Clinical literature identified through MEDLINE (January 1966-August 2001). Key search terms included gastroesophageal reflux, benzimidazoles; omeprazole; lansoprazole; pantoprazole; rabeprazole; receptor antagonists, histamine(2); therapy, combination drug; therapy, combined modality; and combinations, drug. DATA SYNTHESIS: Approximately 80-90% of patients show healing of reflux esophagitis after 8 weeks of once-daily PPI therapy. Patients taking PPI therapy twice daily still have nocturnal acid breakthrough (periods of gastric pH <4 lasting for > or =60 min during the night) as much as 70% of the time. The clinical application of this finding has not been shown. One trial has shown that omeprazole in the morning plus ranitidine at bedtime is not as effective as omeprazole twice daily given before the morning and evening meals at controlling nocturnal acid breakthrough. Further, 1 small trial in healthy subjects without GERD showed that the addition of a 1-time dose of ranitidine at bedtime to a twice-daily regimen of omeprazole may decrease the occurrence of nocturnal acid breakthrough. However, the clinical significance of this finding is not clear. CONCLUSIONS: No studies in patients with GERD demonstrate that the addition of histamine(2) receptor antagonists to twice-daily PPI therapy provides any further benefit above that derived from PPIs alone. The parameter used to measure the efficacy of combination regimens for GERD thus far--nocturnal acid breakthrough--has not been proven to correlate with improvement of GERD symptoms in any controlled or prospective clinical trials. Further investigation is needed to determine optimal therapy in patients refractory to standard doses of PPIs.     

Influence of antisecretory treatment with proton pump inhibitors on serum pepsinogen I levels

It has been reported in literature that serum pepsinogen levels rise during omeprazole and lansoprazole administration. However, the influence of pantoprazole and esomeprazole on serum pepsinogens levels is still to be assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on pepsinogen I (PGI) levels. PGI and gastrin (G17) levels (EIA; Biohit, Helsinki, Finland) in 126 consecutive patients (M 57; F 69, mean age 53, range 15-91), with upper gastrointestinal symptoms at baseline condition and after 2 months of PPI treatment, were evaluated. Patients underwent a therapy schedule based on: omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. (20 patients), pantoprazole 40 mg b.i.d. (27 patients), esomeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. (29 patients), lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. (21 patients) and rabeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. (26 patients) for 2 months. A significant increase in serum PGI (sPGI) levels was found after a 2-month treatment for all five different PPIs: omeprazole, pantoprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole and rabeprazole (P < 0.05). The effect of rabeprazole on sPGI was less pronounced as compared with other PPIs, whereas esomeprazole achieved superior sPGI levels, with no overall statistically significant difference among the five groups (P > 0.05). However, a comparison within a single group of PPIs showed a statistical significance when the esomeprazole group was compared with the rabeprazole group (P = 0.007). sPGI levels are significantly influenced by antisecretory therapy, rising under PPI treatment. Moreover, a statistically significant difference in sPGI levels between the rabeprazole and esomeprazole groups has been demonstrated.     

质子泵抑制剂导致的急性泛发性发疹性脓疱病:基于真实世界的药物警戒研究

  目的  探讨不同质子泵抑制剂(proton pump inhibitors, PPIs)与急性泛发性发疹性脓疱病(acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, AGEP)的关联性及特点。  方法  检索2004年1月至2020年6月美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(Food and Drug Administration's adverse events reporting system, FAERS)数据库中PPIs/AGEP相关报告,采用比例失衡测量法及贝叶斯法对不同PPIs导致的AGEP进行关联性分析,并比较其发病时间及预后。  结果  共检索到此期间PPIs导致的AGEP病例报告162例。应用的PPIs药物主要为奥美拉唑(33.95%,55/162),其次为埃索美拉唑(29.63%,48/162)、泮托拉唑(26.54%,43/162)。以泮托拉唑与AGEP的关联性最强,其次为奥美拉唑和兰索拉唑,埃索美拉唑与AGEP的关联性较弱。PPIs导致AGEP发病时间的中位数为6(2,12)d,60.00%~83.33%的患者于用药后10 d内发病(除雷贝拉唑外)。3例(1.86%)AGEP患者死亡,128例(79.50%)需住院治疗。以埃索美拉唑导致的AGEP患者住院比率最高(91.49%,43/47),其次为泮托拉唑(88.37%,38/43)、兰索拉唑(85.71%,12/44),奥美拉唑(61.82%,34/55)最低。  结论  基于对FAERS数据库的药物警戒研究,揭示不同PPIs导致AGEP的风险及特点,可为临床合理用药提供依据。     

Comparison of five-day Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens: rabeprazole-based and omeprazole-based regimens with and without omeprazole pretreatment

Background: The onset of antisecretory activity of rabeprazole is faster than that of omeprazole.Objective: This study was performed to compare the efficacy of short-term rabeprazole-based triple therapy with that of omeprazole-based triple therapy and to determine the influence of omeprazole pretreatment in omeprazole-based short-term triple therapy.Methods: This was a 2-center, open-label, prospective, randomized study. Patients who tested positive for Helicobacter (formerly Campylobacter) pylori were randomized to one of three 5-day regimens: (1) rabeprazole 20 mg BID, amoxicillin 500 mg TID, and clarithromycin 400 mg BID (RAC group); (2) omeprazole 20 mg BID, amoxicillin 500 mg TID, and clarithromycin 400 mg BID without omeprazole pretreatment (OAC1 group); and (3) omeprazole 20 mg BID, amoxicillin 500 mg TID, and clarithromycin 400 mg BID with 5 days of omeprazole pretreatment 20 mg BID (OAC2 group). Eradication was assessed by ¹³C-urea breath test and rapid urease test ∼1 month after completion of treatment. All patients who entered this study were included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, patients who completed the study were included in the per-protocol (PP) analysis, and patients who did not undergo the ¹³C-urea breath test and rapid urease test were included in the all-patients-treated (APT) analysis.Results: A total of 120 patients (86 men, 34 women; mean [SD] age, 55.8 [14.3] years; range, 19-86 years) were assigned to the RAC, OAC1, or OAC2 group (40 patients in each group). ITT, PP, and APT eradication rates in the RAC group were 90%, 92%, and 90%, respectively; in the OAC1 group, 75%, 83%, and 75%; and in the OAC2 group, 85%, 90%, and 87%. These eradication rates were not significantly different between groups.Conclusions: Eradication rates did not differ significantly between the three 5-day proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies in this study population. However, 5-day rabeprazole-based triple therapy tends to be more effective than 5-day omeprazole-based triple therapy in the eradication of H pylori, and treatment with omeprazole before eradication therapy may improve the eradication rates of 5-day omeprazole-based therapy.     

In Vitro Study of the Variable Effects of Proton Pump Inhibitors on Voriconazole

Voriconazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal agent used for the treatment of severe fungal infections. Maintaining therapeutic concentrations of 1 to 5.5 μg/ml is currently recommended to maximize the exposure-response relationship of voriconazole. However, this is challenging, given the highly variable pharmacokinetics of the drug, which includes metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isotypes CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP2C9, through which common metabolic pathways for many medications take place and which are also expressed in different isoforms with various metabolic efficacies. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are also metabolized through these enzymes, making them competitive inhibitors of voriconazole metabolism, and coadministration with voriconazole has been reported to increase total voriconazole exposure. We examined the effects of five PPIs (rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, omeprazole, and esomeprazole) on voriconazole concentrations using four sets of human liver microsomes (HLMs) of different CYP450 phenotypes. Overall, the use of voriconazole in combination with any PPI led to a significantly higher voriconazole yield compared to that achieved with voriconazole alone in both pooled HLMs (77% versus 59%; P < 0.001) and individual HLMs (86% versus 76%; P < 0.001). The mean percent change in the voriconazole yield from that at the baseline after PPI exposure in pooled microsomes ranged from 22% with pantoprazole to 51% with esomeprazole. Future studies are warranted to confirm whether and how the deliberate coadministration of voriconazole and PPIs can be used to boost voriconazole levels in patients with difficult-to-treat fungal infections.     

The efficacy of extended-interval dosing of omeprazole in keeping gastroesophageal reflux disease patients symptom free.

The potential economic advantage of alternate-day therapy for GERD maintenance must be weighed against the potential cost of failure before it can be widely instituted. The studies presented have helped develop a clinical picture of the patients who may benefit from alternate-day therapy without risk of complications or potential increases in management costs. Bank et al., reporting on a group of patients, found that patients with Grade II-IV disease had a 61% success rate at two to eight years. Bank defined success as both maintenance of endoscopic healing and symptom control. Ladas et al. found a 66.7% success rate defined as clinical and endoscopic remission in Grades II-III disease. Kurucar et al. monitored symptom control and esophageal complications in his patients and found the regimen to have a 26% success rate in Grades III-IV disease. Lind et al. found that 83% of patients could remain symptom free with on-demand therapy if they were endoscopy-negative at baseline. The results of the Mantides et al. study are important because they imply that alternate-day omeprazole therapy may be more effective than alternatives for step-down treatment, such as ranitidine or cisapride. Furthermore, patients can be educated to increase their frequency of use if symptoms should arise. Not only does this give the patient a sense of self-empowerment over his or her disease state, but it avoids the cost of switching to a PPI due to failure with an H2RA or a motility agent. Alternate-day use of omeprazole should be attempted only during the maintenance phase of GERD therapy. Patients requiring >20 mg/d to achieve healing appeared to be poor candidates for alternate-day omeprazole maintenance therapy. Based on available studies, it would seem that patients with Grades 0-II GERD would benefit most from alternate-day therapy. A role for alternate-day therapy in Grades III-IV is apparent from the results presented but requires greater caution in view of the differing success rates (26-61%) in various studies. With Grades II-III esophagitis, a mean 24-hour gastric pH >6 and a gastric pH <4 less than 10% of the time during the initial healing phase with omeprazole 20 mg/d appeared to be associated with success on alternate-day therapy. Evidence that all marketed PPIs have similar success is not available and should not be extrapolated from the data presented. Evidence that downward dosage adjustments of PPIs versus extending dosage intervals are effective in the maintenance of GERD should be recognized. Lansoprazole has been approved for treating erosive esophagitis at 30 mg/d, with the maintenance dose established at 15 mg/d. Studies showing that lansoprazole 15 mg/d is more effective than alternate-day therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg exist, although similar studies with omeprazole have not been performed. The abstracts describing the use of alternate-day omeprazole accounted for all enrollees and included endoscopic grading or pH monitoring to document disease severity at baseline. Most also included these same objective measures as end points in combination with symptom control. This strengthens the data since the positive predictive value of typical symptoms is variable. However, there are also several significant limitations. Abstracts provide only limited information on methods. All studies other than Lind et al. lacked randomization. This study was also the only one that blinded patients to their treatment. Sample sizes for the majority of the trials were quite small. Statistical analyses were not performed on any of the trial results with the exception of the trial by Lind et al. In light of the lack of evidence of statistical significance as well as study design flaws, conclusions should be drawn cautiously. Larger well-designed trials looking at both the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of alternate day omeprazole are required before a definitive recommendation can be made.     

Pharmacokinetic properties of lansoprazole (30-mg enteric-coated capsules) and its metabolites: A single-dose, open-label study in healthy Chinese male subjects

Background: Lansoprazole, a benzimidazole derivative, is indicated for the treatment of various peptic diseases. It is metabolized mainly in the liver, and its primary active metabolites present in plasma are 5′-hydroxy lansoprazole and lansoprazole sulfone. Few data are available on the pharmacokinetic properties of lansoprazole, 5′-hydroxy lansoprazole, and lansoprazole sulfone, which can be used to measure cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 activity.Objectives: The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical plasma pharmacokinetic properties of lansoprazole and its metabolites in healthy Chinese male volunteers, and to assess the influences of CYP2C19 on the pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole.Methods: Healthy adult Chinese male volunteers were enrolled in this single-dose, open-label study. All patients received a single oral enteric capsule containing 30 mg of lansoprazole after a 12-hour overnight fast. Serial blood samples were collected immediately before (0 hour) and at 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes and 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, and 24 hours after study drug administration. The plasma concentrations of lansoprazole, 5′-hydroxy lansoprazole, and lansoprazole sulfone were determined using a validated internal standard high-performance liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic properties (including C_max, T_max, elimination t_½ [t_½z], mean residence time [MRT], AUC_0-24, AUC_0−∞, apparent oral clearance [CL_z/F], and apparent volume of distribution [V_z/F]) were determined using the noncompartmental method.Results: Twenty volunteers (mean [SD] age, 34.9 [2.9] years; weight, 64.6 [2.2] kg; height, 171.3 [3.3] cm) were enrolled in and completed the study. The mean (SD) pharmacokinetic properties of lansoprazole were as follows: C_max, 1047 (344) ng/mL; T_max, 2.0 (0.7) hours; t_½z, 2.24 (1.43) hours; MRT, 3.62 (0.87) hours; AUC₀₋₂₄, 3388 (1484) ng/mL/h; AUC_0-∞, 3496 (1693) ng/mL/h; CL_z/F, 9.96 (3.74) L/h; and V_z/F, 32.83 (11.74) L. The findings with 5′-hydroxy lansoprazole and lansoprazole sulfone, respectively, were as follows: C_max, 111.2 (41.8) and 66.6 (52.9) ng/mL; T_max, 2.1 (0.8) and 1.9 (0.8) hours; t_½z, 2.31 (1.18) and 2.52 (1.54) hours; and AUC₀₋₂₄, 317.0 (81.2) and 231.9 (241.7) ng/mL/h. No adverse events were reported throughout the study.Conclusions: In these healthy Chinese male volunteers administered a single oral dose of lansoprazole 30 mg, absorption of lansoprazole was rapid (mean C_max, 1047 ng/mL; T_max, ~2.0 hours). Its 2 primary active metabolites, 5′-hydroxy lansoprazole and lansoprazole sulfone, were identified in measurable quantities in plasma (C_max, 111.2 and 66.6 ng/mL, respectively; and T_max, 2.1 and 1.9 hours). The plasma t_½z did not appear to reflect the duration of suppression of gastric acid secretion: the t_½z values of lansoprazole and the 2 metabolites were ~2 to 2.5 hours, while the acid-inhibitory effect lasted >24 hours. C_max, AUC, and t_½z of lansoprazole, and especially lansoprazole sulfone, varied. Differences in metabolism types and/or genotype of CYP2C19 should be taken into account when planning a lansoprazole dosing regimen.     

Clinical effect of proton pump inhibitors on reflux esophagitis]

The clinical efficacy of proton pump inhibitors (PPI, omeprazole 20 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg), once daily, after breakfast, was studied in patients with erosive/ulcerative reflux esophagitis. The following results were obtained. 1) Twenty-four hour esophageal pH monitoring was performed before treatment and on 7th day of PPI medications. Omeprazole reduced the percent time pH less than 4 from 29.1 to 1.2 and lansoprazole from 68.0 to 2.4. 2) The cumulative disappearance rate of overall symptom was 52% after 1 week and 62% after 2 weeks with omeprazole these were 66% and 91%, and with lansoprazole respectively 3) The endoscopic healing rate was 63% was after 2 weeks and 76% after 4 weeks with omeprazole medication, and 76% and 97% respectively with lansoprazole. These results indicate that PPI medication inhibits the acid reflux almost completely and is a more useful therapeutic agent for GERD than H2-antagonists.     

Direct medical costs in patients with Alzheimer's disease in Taiwan: A population-based study

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) has the potential to become a major health concern and associated health care costs may become a significant economic burden on society.Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs attributable to AD in patients aged ≥60 years in Taiwan from 2000 through 2002 and to explore the correlation of these costs with patients' age and sex.Methods: This study was based on the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) program. The NHI program insures >98% of the 23 million inhabitants of Taiwan. Detailed data were extracted from a random sample of 0.2% of inpatient and 5% of outpatient recipients with AD (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code 331.0) who were aged ≥60 years and who received inpatient or outpatient services with claims from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2002. Duplicate charges for a specific patient and diagnoses of other types of dementia were excluded from this study.Results: A total of 69,780 patients were found to have a diagnosis of AD. The direct medical costs for outpatients were estimated at US $1.2 million in 2000, US $1.9 million in 2001, and US $2.3 million in 2002; the costs for inpatient care were estimated at US $670,000 in 2000, US $2.4 million in 2001, and US $3.2 million in 2002. The total direct medical costs were estimated at US $1.86 million in 2000, US $4.24 million in 2001, and US $5.48 million in 2002. The increase of total direct medical costs was not significantly correlated with patients' age or sex.Conclusions: From 2000 through 2002, the direct medical costs of AD increased annually in Taiwan among patients with AD aged ≥60 years. No significant correlation was found between increased total direct medical costs and sex or age. The cost estimate presented here has implications for future decision making about reallocating medical resources for treating AD in Taiwan.     

Anaphylactic reactions to proton-pump inhibitors

OBJECTIVE: To report two cases of anaphylactic reactions to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). CASE SUMMARIES: A 54-year-old woman who had taken omeprazole in the past was treated with omeprazole 40 mg and developed periorbital edema, edema of the skin, pruritus, nausea, and vomiting about 45 minutes after taking one capsule. Five months later, she was treated with lansoprazole 30-mg capsules. Again, within 45 minutes she developed an even more serious reaction, with pruritus and urticaria on her whole body, increased sweating, facial edema, and loss of consciousness. A 61 -year-old man took one tablet of pantoprazole 40 mg one year after first being treated with the drug. Within hours after ingestion, he developed malaise, generalized pruritus and urticaria, a swollen tongue and eyes, and diffuse sweating; his blood pressure decreased to 75/50 mm Hg. DISCUSSION: Because of the acute onset of symptoms and close temporal association with exposure to the drug, as well as previous exposure to it, the reactions can be classified as anaphylactic shock to PPIs. These benzimidazole derivatives are chemically related; observations in a few patients, such as the first case above, suggest that cross-sensitivity may occur. The Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC) has received a total of 42 reports of anaphylactic reactions or anaphylactic shock in association with PPIs. These reports account for 0.2% of the total of reported suspected adverse drug reactions to PPIs, compared with 0.8% anaphylactic reactions in the UMC database as a whole. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the chemically related PPIs can, as a group, cause anaphylactic reactions; however, the rate is comparatively low. Since anaphylaxis is a potentially serious reaction, more precise information is needed regarding its frequency, and healthcare professionals need to be aware of this possibility when prescribing these agents.     

Appropriate choice of proton pump inhibitor therapy in the prevention and management of NSAID-related gastrointestinal damage

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are associated with gastrointestinal adverse effects, ranging from dyspepsia and peptic ulcer disease to more serious complications such as haemorrhage or perforation. NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity is a significant medical problem worldwide. Misoprostol is effective in reducing NSAID-induced mucosal damage, but patient compliance is limited by poor tolerance. Histamine receptor antagonists are relatively effective against duodenal ulcers but offer no significant protection against gastric ulcers. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), such as pantoprazole, omeprazole and lansoprazole, have been shown to be effective in preventing the development of gastric and duodenal ulcers in high-risk patients taking NSAIDs. PPI therapy is also beneficial in healing NSAID-induced ulcers and preventing their recurrence in patients requiring ongoing NSAID therapy. PPIs have an excellent safety profile, and pantoprazole--with its low potential for drug-drug interactions--is particularly suitable for administration to elderly patients who often require concomitant treatment with other medications.     

Lessons from two cases of anaphylaxis to proton pump inhibitors

What is known and Objective: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which are widely used for the treatment of peptic ulcers and gastroesophageal diseases, reduce both basal and stimulated gastric acid secretion by inhibiting the parietal cell enzyme H(+)‐K(+)‐adenosine triphosphatase. There have been several reports of hypersensitivity reactions to PPIs but anaphylaxis is very rare. We report on two cases of anaphylaxis to PPIs. Case summary: Our two interesting and instructive cases of anaphylaxis to PPIs relate to the orally disintegrating form of lansoprazole and omeprazole. The first patient had taken esomeprazole 20 mg/day for 1 month without any side effects before experiencing anaphylaxis to lansoprazole. To our knowledge, this is the first report of anaphylaxis to the orally disintegrating form of lansoprazole. In the second case, the patient was misdiagnosed with penicillin allergy which she suffered from earlier. What is new and Conclusion: Physicians need to be more aware of the possibility of hypersensitivity to PPIs.     

Lansoprazole versus omeprazole for duodenal ulcer healing and prevention of relapse: a randomized, multicenter, double-masked trial.

The aim of this randomized, multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group study was to compare the efficacy of lansoprazole with that of omeprazole monotherapy in duodenal ulcer healing and prevention of relapse. A total of 251 patients with duodenal ulcer were treated with either lansoprazole 30 mg/d (n = 167) or omeprazole 40 mg/d (n = 84). Patients with healed ulcers were then randomly allocated to 12 months of maintenance therapy with lansoprazole 15 mg/d (n = 74), lansoprazole 30 mg/d (n = 71), or omeprazole 20 mg/d (n = 73). Healing rates at 4 weeks (intent-to-treat analysis) were 93.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.2% to 97.6%) with lansoprazole and 97.5% (95% CI, 93.7% to 100%) with omeprazole; there were no significant differences between groups. Endoscopic relapse rates after 6 months were 4.5% (95% CI, 0% to 10.6%) with lansoprazole 15 mg, 0% with lansoprazole 30 mg, and 6.3% (95% CI, 1.5% to 12.5%) with omeprazole 20 mg, compared with 3.3% (95% CI, 0% to 8.2%), 0%, and 3.5% (95% CI, 0% to 8.8%), respectively, at 12 months. Again, there were no significant differences between groups. The incidence of adverse events during acute treatment was 6.0% and 7.1% in the lansoprazole and omeprazole groups, respectively; during maintenance therapy, the incidences were 12.2% (lansoprazole 15 mg), 5.6% (lansoprazole 30 mg), and 11.0% (omeprazole 20 mg). Within treatment groups, pain was significantly ameliorated after the acute phase but not after maintenance therapy (P < 0.05); no differences were observed between groups. Gastrin values increased significantly after acute therapy (P < 0.05), persisted at these increased levels during maintenance therapy, and returned to normal after 6-month follow-up. Both lansoprazole and omeprazole were highly effective and well tolerated in the treatment of duodenal ulcer; relapse rates were similar for all doses studied. Thus no additional benefit is to be gained from using a proton-pump inhibitor at a dose > 15 mg lansoprazole to prevent relapse.     

Bioequivalence of Two Formulations of a Single Oral Dose of 500-mg Azithromycin Granules: A Randomized, Open-Label, Two-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Han Chinese Volunteers

Background: In recent years, the use of generic drugs has been increasing due to their effectiveness and to the increasing variety of drugs that are now available in generic formulations. Although several generic oral formulations of azithromycin are available in China, information concerning the bioavailability of these formulations in the Chinese population is unavailable.Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the bioequivalence and tolerability of a single oral dose of 2 commercial brands of 500-mg azithromycin granules in healthy Han Chinese volunteers.Methods: In a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study, the bioequivalence and tolerability of 2 commercial formulations of azithromycin granules (test: Dayin Ocean Biochemical Company Ltd., Shandong, China; reference: Taiyang Drug Company Ltd., Beijing, China) were compared in healthy adult Han Chinese volunteers. Both the test and the reference formulations were administered to each subject. The 2 treatment phases were separated by a 3-week washout period. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine plasma drug concentrations. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the natural log-transformed ratios of C_max and AUC were within the predetermined equivalence range of 70% to 143% and 80% to 125%, respectively, and if P ≤ 0.05 for the 90% CIs.Results: Twenty-four male Han Chinese volunteers (mean [SD] age, 21.0 [2.0] years [range, 18-25 years]; mean [SD] weight, 67.6 [5.6] kg [range, 56-81 kg]; mean [SD] height, 176.0 [5.0] cm [range, 165-188 cm]) were enrolled. Twenty-two subjects completed the study, with 2 withdrawing for personal reasons. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the corresponding ratios of C_max, AUC from hour 0 to time t, and AUC from hour 0 to any time point were 85.9 to 103.9, 83.6 to 106.0, and 84.7 to 105.9 (in the 2 one-sided t tests; all, P < 0.05), respectively. Similar results were found in data without a logarithmic transformation. There were no significant differences in the plasma concentration-time curves of the test and reference formulations. No adverse events were reported by the subjects or revealed by clinical or laboratory tests.Conclusions: Single oral doses of 2 commercial brands of azithromycin granules (500 mg) were equivalent with regard to the rate and extent of absorption among these healthy Han Chinese volunteers. Both formulations were well tolerated.     

Second-line and third-line trial for helicobacter pylori infection in patients with duodenal ulcers: A prospective, crossover, controlled study

Background: Following standard first-line triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection, up to 20% of patients require further eradication.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of second-line triple therapies and third-line quadruple therapies for the eradication of H pylori.Methods: This 7-week, prospective, crossover, controlled, second- and third-line trial was conducted at the Department of Gastroenterology, Ferencváros Health Center (Budapest, Hungary). Patients aged 18 to 80 years with duodenal ulcers and an H pylori infection resistant to first-line triple therapy (pantoprazole 40 mg BID + amoxicillin 1000 mg BID + clarithromycin 500 mg BID [PAC] given as tablets) received a different triple therapy regimen (ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg BID + metronidazole 500 mg BID + clarithromycin 500 mg BID [RBC-MC]) for 7 days (group 1A), and nonresponders after RBC + 2 antimicrobials received the pantoprazole-based regimen (group 1B). After secondary failure, patients were randomized to receive quadruple therapies: pantoprazole, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and either nitrofurantoin or bismuth subsalicylate (groups 2A and 2B).Results: One hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled in the second-line study (56 men, 78 women; mean [SD] age, 51.1 [12.4] years; group 1A, 68 patients; group 1B, 66 patients). Subsequently, 41 (30.6%) of these patients were randomized to receive quadruple therapies. Using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the eradication rates did not differ significantly (60.3% and 65.2% in groups 1A and 1B, respectively; 61.9% and 55.0% in groups 2A and 2B, respectively). Perprotocol eradication rates did not differ significantly (66.1% and 68.3% in groups 1A and 1B, respectively); however, the rates were significantly different in group 2A (66.7%) versus group 2B (55.5%) (P = 0.03).