Musculoskeletal ultrasound--a state of the art review in rheumatology. Part 1: Current controversies and issues in the development of musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology

As we begin the 21st century, musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is routinely used by an increasing number of rheumatologists throughout Europe and there is a growing interest in the application of MSUS in rheumatological practice in the UK. MSUS allows high-resolution, real-time imaging of articular and periarticular structures and has the advantages of being non-radioactive, inexpensive, portable, highly acceptable to patients and repeatable. There are a number of critical issues that need to be addressed in order to develop the role of MSUS within rheumatology. These include issues of equipment costs, training and certification and the relationship of rheumatologists and radiologists in advancing the field of MSUS. Rheumatologists must demonstrate the relevance of MSUS in their clinical practice through high-quality research. Emerging technologies such as power Doppler and 3D imaging will further improve imaging capabilities and the range of clinical applications of MSUS systems. This paper reviews how MSUS in rheumatology has evolved and the controversies and issues that rheumatologists must now address in developing MSUS as an indispensable, everyday clinical tool.     

Clinical implementation of musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology in Austria

The aim of the study is to assess the clinical implementation of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) in rheumatology in Austria. A survey was conducted among Austrian rheumatologists and physicians of other specialties with a focus on rheumatology. The questionnaire was designed by the members of the Austrian Radiology–Rheumatology Initiative for Musculoskeletal UltraSound including the following items: demographics, access to MSUS and MSUS training, application of MSUS to support diagnosis, monitoring and treatment decisions, and obstacles for the routine performance of MSUS. Eighty-eight (21.9 %) out of the 402 surveyed physicians responded. No access to MSUS and/or inadequate training in the technique was more commonly reported by senior (>50 years; 64.3 and 67.7 %, respectively) than by younger physicians (16.7 %, p = 0.01 and 18.5 %, p < 0.001, respectively). The lowest availability of sonography was found among senior rheumatologists (25.0 %, p = 0.001 compared to the total group). MSUS is routinely used for diagnosis and/or monitoring purposes by 12.5 % of physicians and 20.5 % perform sonography in clinically unclear cases. A limited number of physicians apply the method to support treatment decisions and/or to evaluate treatment success. The most important obstacles for routine application of MSUS in rheumatology are limited access to ultrasound machines, lack of training/education in the technique, and time constraints in daily routine. Low access to high-end ultrasound devices, lack of training, and time constraints may explain the low appreciation of MSUS among Austrian physicians evaluating patients with rheumatic diseases.     

Musculoskeletal ultrasound training in rheumatology: the Belfast experience

OBJECTIVES: Despite the increasing use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) as a clinical tool in rheumatology, there is no consensus yet regarding the standards required to achieve a basic level of competence in the use of this imaging technique. A number of sonographers worldwide are developing curricula and standardizing teaching methods in order to improve training in MSUS for rheumatologists. In the meantime, clinicians are devising informal means of training in order to acquire these new skills. Here we describe the informal team approach to MSUS training adopted by a group of rheumatologists from the Regional Rheumatology Centre in Belfast, UK. METHODS: Over a 5-yr period, eight rheumatologists from Musgrave Park Hospital in Belfast used a variety of means to learn the basic skills of MSUS. RESULTS: Seven of the team underwent a formal assessment of their competency in a practical examination devised by an experienced sonographer. All were judged to have attained a basic competency in MSU. CONCLUSIONS: This Belfast experience shows what can be achieved despite the absence of formal MSUS training. Nevertheless, the development of recognized training programmes and international standards of competency are important goals on the way to achieving more widespread acceptance of MSUS as a useful tool in everyday clinical practice.     

Self‐directed learning of basic musculoskeletal ultrasound among rheumatologists in the United States

Objective

Because musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is highly user dependent, we aimed to establish whether non‐mentored learning of MSUS is sufficient to achieve the same level of diagnostic accuracy and scanning reliability as has been achieved by rheumatologists recognized as international experts in MSUS.

Methods

A group of 8 rheumatologists with more experience in MSUS and 8 rheumatologists with less experience in MSUS participated in an MSUS exercise to assess patients with musculoskeletal abnormalities commonly seen in a rheumatology practice. Patients' established diagnoses were obtained from chart review (gout, osteoarthritis, rotator cuff syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and seronegative arthritis). Two examining groups were formed, each composed of 4 less experienced and 4 more experienced examiners. Each group scanned 1 predefined body region (hand, wrist, elbow, shoulder, knee, or ankle) in each of 8 patients, blinded to medical history and physical examination. Structural abnormalities were noted with dichotomous answers, and an open‐ended answer was used for the final diagnosis.

Results

Less experienced and more experienced examiners achieved the same diagnostic accuracy (US‐established diagnosis versus chart review diagnosis). The interrater reliability for tissue pathology was slightly higher for more experienced versus less experienced examiners (κ = 0.43 versus κ = 0.34; P = 0.001).

Conclusion

Non‐mentored training in MSUS can lead to the achievement of diagnostic accuracy in MSUS comparable to that achieved by highly experienced international experts. Reliability may increase slightly with additional experience. Further study is needed to determine the minimal training requirement to achieve proficiency in MSUS.     

The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) presents many diagnostic, management and research challenges for rheumatologists who wish to obtain early diagnosis, differentiate synovitis and enthesitis, monitor disease activity accurately and objectively, prevent the development of structural damage, deliver local therapy accurately, and obtain PsA tissue for research purposes. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) is widely used by European rheumatologists in their clinical practice to meet these challenges and has the potential to become the rheumatologist’s stethoscope in Europe and North America. This paper examines the evidence that MSUS can improve clinical evaluation of patients with PsA for synovitis and enthesitis, that MSUS is more sensitive than plain radiography in detecting structural damage in joints, that MSUS can improve the success of joint aspiration and guide biopsy of PsA tissues. Recent exciting developments in the management of PsA are detailed including the role of power Doppler in the diagnosis of enthesitis in PsA, the role of MSUS in objective monitoring of disease activity, the evaluation of MSUS in the diagnosis of sacroiliitis, and the use of MSUS to guide therapeutic injection of the sacroiliac joints.     

Comparison of musculoskeletal ultrasound practices of a rheumatologist and a radiologist

OBJECTIVE: There is considerable debate regarding the role of the rheumatologist ultrasonographer and how this development will impact on musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) performed by radiologists. We compared the MSUS practices of a rheumatologist and a radiologist working within the same National Health Service Trust. METHODS: A retrospective review of MSUS reports of consecutive scans performed by a consultant rheumatologist with a special interest in MSUS and a consultant musculoskeletal radiologist. Reports were analysed for referring specialties, indications for MSUS, joint regions scanned, MSUS findings, frequency with which patients were referred for injection and how often injection was performed. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients were referred to the rheumatologist for MSUS of 282 joint regions (91% referred by rheumatologists). Of those, 84 (49%) patients had MSUS examination of more than one joint region, with up to five regions scanned per sitting. One hundred patients were referred to the radiologist for MSUS of 111 joint regions (49% referred by orthopaedic surgeons). The most frequently requested primary indication for MSUS performed by the rheumatologist was detection of synovitis [74 (44%) patients] while MSUS performed by the radiologist was most frequently for assessment for major structural changes [44 (44%) patients]. The rheumatologist performed MSUS-guided injection in 59 of 170 (35%) patients scanned and the radiologist in 13 of 100 (13%). CONCLUSION: MSUS performed by the rheumatologist was predominantly requested by rheumatologists to aid diagnosis of synovial and tendon inflammation and to guide injections, while MSUS performed by the radiologist was predominantly requested by orthopaedic surgeons to aid diagnosis of structural pathology. Curriculums in MSUS designed for rheumatologists may need to place appropriate emphasis on the identification of synovial and tendon inflammation, and injection guidance.     

Ultrasound in rheumatology

Over the last decade, several studies have highlighted the value of ultrasonography for both clinical and research purposes in rheumatology. Ultrasonography is a non-invasive, inexpensive and free-of-radiation-hazards imaging technique providing quick and useful information for the management of rheumatic diseases. Considerable evidence supporting the role of ultrasonography in rheumatological clinical practice has led many rheumatologists to want to become experienced with this imaging technique. The main indications of ultrasonography in rheumatology include the evaluation of patients with regional pain syndromes and chronic arthritis, short-term therapy monitoring and guidance for invasive procedures. Ultrasonography's long learning curve is the main obstacle that hinders its widespread use in rheumatology. Many technical aspects may affect the scanning process and a correct interpretation of sonographic images depends on several elements such as a deep knowledge of ultrasonography anatomy and pathology.     

Health services in rheumatology

Studies of the costs associated with rheumatic diseases, the referral of patients to rheumatology subspecialty care, rheumatology practice patterns, and the relation between medical care and patient outcomes are reviewed. Direct medical costs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are higher among those with more functional disability. Direct medical costs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) did not differ among Canadian, American, and British patients, despite substantial differences in the mechanisms by which medical care is financed and delivered in these three countries. The diagnostic accuracy of rheumatic complaints by primary care physicians may be low, and concomitant psychiatric disorders may not be uncommon among patients referred to rheumatologists. Most patient visits to rheumatologists involve patients with rheumatic diseases or musculoskeletal complaints, and few visits involve primary care. Fewer than half of elderly patients with RA or SLE are seen by a rheumatologist in a given year; access is particularly limited among black women. Early access to rheumatology subspecialty care may be associated with improved health status in patients with RA, and mortality among patients with SLE varies with the experience a hospital has in treating patients with SLE.     

Medical arthroscopy: A tool for diagnosis and research in rheumatology

Arthroscopy is an important diagnostic procedure which can be used in rheumatology practice to provide direct visualization of the joint cavity, permitting macroscopic evaluation of the synovium, sampling for histopathologic and microbiologic examination and the potential therapeutic benefit of lavage. The term ‘medical arthroscopy’ is used here to refer to arthroscopy performed by rheumatologists for these purposes. This term differentiates arthroscopy performed by orthopedic surgeons for structural interventions such as meniscal debridement and ligament repair. Medical arthroscopy finds a place in rheumatology as an aid to diagnosis, to confirm the presence of synovitis when not expected, to provide histologic or microbiologic diagnosis, and potential stratification for therapy, for example in rheumatoid arthritis, as well as a range of other research purposes. It is performed with local anesthetic using a small bore arthroscope, most usually inserted into the knee, although the wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints may also be inspected in this way. In experienced hands it is well tolerated, safe and complications are comparable to those reported by orthopedic surgeons.     

Improvement in diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal conditions with one-stop clinic-based ultrasonography

We evaluated the impact of clinic-based musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) on diagnosis and management of cases as seen in day-to-day rheumatology practice. Data were retrieved for demography, background condition, clinical findings, indications, regions scanned, and outcomes of MSUS, and categorised as: new-patients and follow-up. New-patient records were analysed as to whether MSUS had helped to confirm or change clinical diagnosis or was of no additional help. In follow-ups, we determined whether MSUS had helped in disease assessment, detection of co-existing problems or revision of diagnosis. Its impact on treatment decisions was noted. A total of 237 patients (146 women; mean age 55.9 +/- 17.2 years) had 264 regions scanned; hands,50.7%. In 78/237 (32.9%) there was disagreement between clinical and MSUS findings. Amongst new-patients (72), 13/39 (33.3%) referred with inflammatory arthritis had no MSUS evidence of inflammation in or around joints. In 76.3% it helped in confirming or changing diagnosis. Of the follow-ups (165), in 78.7%, 13.9% and 7.2% it helped in assessment, detection of co-existing problems and revision of diagnosis, respectively. MSUS influenced treatment in 45/165 (27.27%) cases. In 60/67 (89.55%) cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), it was done for disease assessment; in 31/60 (51.66%) it influenced treatment. MSUS, as a clinic-based service in rheumatology, has significant impact on the diagnosis and treatment of patients. This has potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty and follow-up visits and ensure better outcomes.     

Attitudes of United Kingdom rheumatologists to musculoskeletal ultrasound practice and training

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to describe what clinical rheumatologists currently use musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) for, how they are currently training and is the first study to survey rheumatologists to determine their preferences for MSUS training implementation. METHODS: 250 questionnaires were distributed at the British Society of Rheumatology Annual General Meeting (BSR AGM), 2005. RESULTS: 126 (50%) of questionnaires were completed by UK rheumatologists and were analysed. 117 (93%) of the respondents use MSUS imaging for patient management, with 41 (33%) indicating they perform MSUS themselves. Only two (2%) performed MSUS for >5 years. Rheumatologists use MSUS to image all peripheral joints-particularly the hands and feet-to assess joint and soft tissue inflammation and to guide joint injections. Lack of training in MSUS was the principal reason for not performing MSUS. Respondents expressed a preference for future training to be via a programme of regular sessions, with training delivered by either consultant radiologists or rheumatologists. Mentoring was the educational tool and assessment method of choice. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of respondents use MSUS in the management of their patients, with a third performing MSUS themselves. The report indicates rheumatologists' preferences on how training should be delivered in the future.     

Utility and feasibility of musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSK US) in rheumatology practice in Canada: needs assessment

The utility of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK US) is being extensively explored and evaluated amongst European rheumatologists. However, utilization of MSK US by rheumatologists in Canada is much less common. This study aimed to evaluate the current use of MSK US in Canadian rheumatology practice, to determine beliefs and attitudes towards MSK US, and to determine factors that may encourage or limit its use. A 13-question needs assessment questionnaire was developed. All Canadian rheumatologists were invited via e-mail to participate in the survey. The overall response rate was 156/470 (33%). Fifty-one percent of participants used MSK US in their clinical practice. Lack of training appeared to be the main obstacle to its current use. Eighty-three percent believed that MSK US should be performed by rheumatologists and expressed a willingness to learn the technique. Skills offering greatest clinical utility were the assessment of inflammatory arthritis in small joints (i.e., hands (metacarpophalyngeal and proximal interphalangeal joints), wrists, feet (metatarsophalyngeal), shoulders, and ankles. Limited available time, equipment costs, and difficulties with billing were the main obstacles to MSK US utilization in the clinical setting. There is a great level of interest in learning and applying MSK US in Canadian rheumatology practice. The balance between added clinical value and lack of remuneration, equipment associated costs, and time to complete training is the major limiting factor influencing rheumatologists' willingness to take on MSK US. Training programs must be relevant to rheumatologists' needs before MSK US will be adopted into routine clinical practice in Canada.     

Ultrasound-guided injections in rheumatology: Actual knowledge on efficacy and procedures

Ultrasound allows one to detect easily joint involvement. In addition to its primary use as a diagnostic tool, ultrasound is increasingly used by rheumatologists to guide musculoskeletal interventions. The correct position of the needle in the target area offers the chance to improve efficacy of the local procedure. Knowledge of anatomy and probe positioning as well as the ability to coordinate probe and needle are necessary when injecting patients with ultrasound guidance. Lack of training and of clear guidelines on their practice is demonstrated by recent surveys and by the high variability of the literature results evaluating practice and outcome of ultrasound-guided injections. This chapter deals with actual knowledge and practical suggestions for the indications and procedures of ultrasound guidance in rheumatology daily practice.     

What practical skills do rheumatologists of the future need?

In this chapter, we consider future practical skills required for rheumatologists. While difficult to predict against a background of rapid technological advance and successive changes to health-care provision world wide, a number of questions are examined. The first question is what core skills are essential in the curriculum? This has been addressed in at least one joint European effort by UEMS. Great diversity in both clinical practice and training was found across Europe; clearly, the difference across continents may prove even more significant. Second, the role of arthroscopy is considered, the evidence for its therapeutic benefit in clinical rheumatology practice being inconclusive. Issues concerning diagnostic methods including electrophysiology and ultrasound (US) are also discussed in this chapter. There is evidence to support the use of electrophysiology in routine diagnosis for specific diseases. US has become popular as technology improves. It is cheap but highly operator dependent, and the feasibility of rheumatologists using US in the clinic remains to be proved. In conclusion, health care is changing rapidly, and training must adapt, and is adapting, to meet its challenges. A number of opportunities will present to the rheumatologist of the future, but the feasibility of these in routine clinical practice remains to be seen.     

Improvement in diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal conditions with one-stop clinic-based ultrasonography

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of clinic-based musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) on diagnosis and management of cases as seen in day-to-day rheumatology practice. Data were retrieved for demography, background condition, clinical findings, indications, regions scanned, and outcomes of MSUS, and categorised as: new-patients and follow-up. New-patient records were analysed as to whether MSUS had helped to confirm or change clinical diagnosis or was of no additional help. In follow-ups, we determined whether MSUS had helped in disease assessment, detection of co-existing problems or revision of diagnosis. Its impact on treatment decisions was noted. A total of 237 patients (146 women; mean age 55.9 ± 17.2 years) had 264 regions scanned; hands,50.7%. In 78/237 (32.9%) there was disagreement between clinical and MSUS findings. Amongst new-patients (72), 13/39 (33.3%) referred with inflammatory arthritis had no MSUS evidence of inflammation in or around joints. In 76.3% it helped in confirming or changing diagnosis. Of the follow-ups (165), in 78.7%, 13.9% and 7.2% it helped in assessment, detection of co-existing problems and revision of diagnosis, respectively. MSUS influenced treatment in 45/165 (27.27%) cases. In 60/67 (89.55%) cases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), it was done for disease assessment; in 31/60 (51.66%) it influenced treatment. MSUS, as a clinic-based service in rheumatology, has significant impact on the diagnosis and treatment of patients. This has potential to reduce diagnostic uncertainty and follow-up visits and ensure better outcomes.     

Imaging techniques in rheumatology: sonography in rheumatoid arthritis

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography has become an important diagnostic tool in rheumatoid arthritis. In Germany it is part of the rheumatology training, and many ultrasound courses provide further education. Only in the last five years the international importance of ultrasound in rheumatology has increased dramatically. Sonography can be performed as a bedside procedure and as an extension of the clinical investigation. It is easily tolerated by the patients, and it can be repeated any time. Sonography can have a great impact on therapeutic decisions. A > or = 5 MHz linear transducer is needed. Most transducers that are used for musculoskeletal ultrasound have about 7.5 MHz. Modern transducers with higher frequencies (>7.5 MHz) and high resolution improve the diagnostic value of the investigation. Sonography is superior to plain radiography to detect erosions as far as the region is accessible by ultrasound. It is more sensitive than the clinical investigation for the detection of synovitis, tenosynovitis, tendinitis, and bursitis as well as for the differentiation of these lesions. Color Doppler sonography aids in evaluating the activity of inflammation and in differentiating intraarticular structures. Carpal- and ulnar neuropathy occur secondary to rheumatoid arthritis and may lead to characteristic nerve swelling. Ultrasound-guided injections into joints and tendon sheets can be performed.     

Calidad percibida de formación en ecografía musculoesquelética en los servicios de reumatología españoles

Background and objectiveUltrasound has been included in the training of residents in rheumatology in recent years, as a result of its increased use in daily clinical practice. Our objective is to evaluate the perceived quality of ultrasound training of residents in rheumatology services in Spain.Material and methodsOnline survey aimed at rheumatologists who began their training in rheumatology between 2009 and 2019.ResultsOne hundred thirty-nine rheumatologists participated in the survey, of which 97.1% had at least one ultrasound machine in their training centre. Up to 51.1% performed a rotation in ultrasound and 56% had an ultrasound consultation. Access to SER courses was high (87.8%) while access to EULAR courses was limited (17.3%) and up to 69.1% of residents did not complete the competency accreditation. Training in evaluation of inflammatory joint activity, entheses and microcrystalline diseases received the highest scores. Evaluation of ultrasound training during the residency was good in 36% of cases, fair in 28.1%, poor in 18% and excellent in 12.9%. Of those surveyed, 88% consider their clinical practice as a rheumatologist to have improved.ConclusionsMost residents have performed ultrasound rotations. Participation in SER ultrasound courses is high and moderate in EULAR courses, while only a minority completed the competency accreditation. The overall degree of satisfaction with training in ultrasound during residency is good and, in the opinion of residents, contributes to the improvement of their skills as rheumatologists.     

La ecografía en reumatología: dónde estamos y hacia dónde nos dirigimos

ObjectiveTo know rheumatologists’ opinion on the usefulness of ultrasound in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making as applied to rheumatic diseases.Material and methodsA National survey was sent to all rheumatology units in hospitals with at least 200 beds. The questionnaire included: a) general data, b) purpose and most common areas of ultrasound exploration and c) assessment of the usefulness of ultrasound in routine clinical practice in general and in some rheumatologic diseases.ResultsOne-hundred-sixty-nine out of 234 rheumatology units contacted answered the questionnaire. The utility in routine clinical practice was scored at 7.8 (scale 0-10) and ultrasound was integrated in making diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Half of the indications (50.9%) were ultrasound related to the process of diagnosis of diseases or treatment decision making (monitoring synovitis 14.6%, guided puncture 11.4%, early detection of joint erosion or synovitis 10.3%, early detection of enthesopathy 5.9%, carpal tunnel syndrome or other peripheral neuropathies 3.4%, detection of uric acid or pyrophosphate deposits 3%, vasculitis 1% and others 1.1%. On a 1-5 Likert, scale most of the answers support the use of ultrasound in clinical practice, especially in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making for detection of subclinical synovitis, erosions and treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis, enthesitis diagnosis, crystal diseases, polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis.ConclusionsUltrasound is becoming a useful tool integrated into clinical practice and is linked to the decision making processes in the areas of diagnosis, activity and treatment.     

Ultrasound imaging in paediatric rheumatology

The role of ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis and monitoring of paediatric rheumatic diseases with special emphasis on recent scientific work regarding the evidence base and standardization of this technique is being reviewed. An overview of the most important practical aspects for the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in a clinical setting is also provided.Huge scientific efforts and advances in recent years illustrate the increasing importance of musculoskeletal ultrasound in pediatric rheumatology. Several studies focused on setting an evidence-based standard for the ultrasound appearance of healthy and normal joints in children of all age groups. Physiologic vascularization and ossification were two main aspects of these studies. Other publications demonstrate that ultrasound imaging is also an important and useful tool to detect pathology as synovitis, tenosynovitis or enthesitis in children and to monitor pediatric patients with rheumatic conditions. Important practical aspects include training in the use of correct ultrasound techniques, as well as knowledge and experience of normal pediatric sonoanatomy and the appearance of pathological findings on ultrasound.     

Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in routine rheumatology practice: data from Central and Eastern European countries

The main aim was to gain structured insight into the use of musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) in routine rheumatology practices in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. In a cross-sectional, observational, international, multicenter survey, a questionnaire was sent to investigational sites in CEE countries. Data on all subsequent routine MSUS examinations, site characteristics, MSUS equipment, and investigators were collected over 6 months or up to 100 examinations per center. A total of 95 physicians at 44 sites in 9 countries provided information on a total of 2810 MSUS examinations. The most frequent diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (34.8 and 14.9 % of cases, respectively). Mean number of joints examined was 6.8. MSUS was most frequently performed for diagnostic purposes (58 %), particularly in patients with undifferentiated arthritis, suspected soft tissue disorders, or osteoarthritis (73.0–85.3 %). In RA patients, 56.3 % of examinations were conducted to monitor disease activity. Nearly all investigations (99 %) had clinical implications, while the results of 78.6 % of examinations (51.6–99.0 %) were deemed useful for patient education. This first standardized multicountry survey performed in CEEs provided a structured documentation of the routine MSUS use in participating countries. The majority of MSUS examinations were performed for diagnostic purposes, whereas one-third was conducted to monitor disease activity in RA. A majority of examinations had an impact on clinical decision making and were also found to be useful for patient education.