Prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in unselected patients with venous thromboembolism

We determined the prevalence of factor V Leiden and of prothrombin G20210A mutations in a cohort of unselected outpatients (n = 748) referred for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) and a pooled analysis of similar studies was also performed. Based on the clinical presentation, the prevalence of factor V Leiden was 15.7% in the 83 patients with DVT and 14.1% in the 99 patients with PE compared with 5.3% in patients without DVT and/or PE (control group). The prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A mutation did not differ among the three groups (3.9% for controls, 4. 8% for DVT and 3.9% for PE patients). We then divided the 99 patients with PE by separately analysing those with PE but without DVT (n = 57) and those with PE and DVT (n = 42). Compared with the control group, the prevalence of factor V Leiden was 10.5%, odds ratio (OR) 2.10 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.68-5.45] in patients with primary PE and 19.1%, OR 4.20 (95% CI 1.54-10.30) in patients with DVT and PE. For the prothrombin G20210A mutation, no statistically significant differences were found between the control group and the three other groups. In conclusion, our data and the pooled analysis indicate that patients with primary PE are less often affected by the factor V Leiden mutation. No statistically significant differences were observed between patients and controls for the prothrombin G20210A mutation.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A, and MTHFR C677T mutations in a Greek population of blood donors.

The pathogenesis of venous thrombosis involves the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. In order to estimate the frequency of the factor V Leiden, the prothrombin G20210A, and the MTHFR C677T mutations in the Greek population, we analyzed 160 healthy Greek blood donors by PCR amplification and detected allele frequencies of 2.5%, 2.2%, and 35.3%, respectively. The allele frequencies were compared with reported frequencies of other populations of southern Europe. The identification of these common genetic risk factors for thrombosis should enable easy DNA diagnosis and carrier detection in a high proportion of cases and will contribute to a better understanding of the interaction of genetic and environmental risk factors.     

Two common genetic thrombotic risk factors: factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A in adult Turkish patients with thrombosis

The prevalence of genetic risk factors for thrombosis varies greatly in different parts of the world, both in patients with thrombosis and in the general population. Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin G20210A (PT G20210A) mutations are the most common genetic defects leading to thrombosis. We have previously reported that those two thrombotic risk alleles are frequently found in Turkish children with thrombosis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the frequency of FVL and PT G20210A and their clinical manifestations in adult Turkish patients with thrombosis. Between January 1997 and February 2000, 146 patients with documented thrombosis were investigated in our center for the presence of the FVL and PT G20210A mutations. Forty-five of 146 patients with thrombosis (30.8%) were detected to have FVL mutation. Among those cases with the FVL mutation, seven (4.8%) had homozygote and 38 (26%) had heterozygote mutation. The PT G20210A mutation was detected in 10 of the 146 patients with thrombosis (6.8%). Another six cases (4.1%) had both FVL and PT G20210A mutations. The overall frequency of these two common risk alleles in our adult population with thrombosis was 41.6%. Our findings reveal that FVL and PT G20210A mutations are significant genetic risk factors contributing to the pathophysiology of thrombosis in the Turkish population.     

Prevalence of mild hyperhomocysteinaemia and association with thrombophilic genotypes (factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A) in Italian patients with venous thromboembolic disease

Mild hyperhomocysteinaemia is an established risk factor for deep vein thrombosis (DVT); few data concerning its potential interaction with thrombophilic genotypes are available at the present time. We investigated 121 thrombosis-free individuals and 111 patients with at least one objectively confirmed episode of DVT. A thrombophilic condition (deficiency in antithrombin, protein C and S, factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A) was detected in 25.2% of the patients; mutant factor V or prothrombin genotypes were present in 6.6% of the controls. Hyperhomocysteinaemia was found in 14.4% of patients and 3. 3% of the controls, with a 3.7-fold increase in risk for DVT (95% CI 1.1-12.3). Adoption of different cut-off levels for definition of hyperhomocysteinaemia did not substantially change the magnitude of the risk. Carriership of both hyperhomocysteinaemia and factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A was detected in 2.7% of patients for each combination and in none of the controls. An approximate estimate of 30-fold increased risk in carriers of both hyperhomocysteinaemia and factor V Leiden and 50-fold increased risk in carriers of both hyperhomocysteinaemia and prothrombin G20210A was calculated, suggesting a synergistic interaction between hyperhomocysteinaemia and such thrombophilic genotypes. Yet statistical analysis is highly unstable due to the small number of individuals with combined defects. Further investigations on large series of patients are needed.     

Factor V Leiden, prothrombin 20210A and the risk of venous thrombosis among cancer patients

Cancer patients have an increased risk of venous thrombosis (VT). The association of factor V Leiden (FVL) and the prothrombin 20210A variant with VT in cancer patients is not established. We genotyped 101 cancer patients with VT and 101 cancer patients without VT for these polymorphisms. Five cases and three controls were heterozygous for FVL, yielding an odds ratio of 1.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-10.7). Five cases and no controls were heterozygous for prothrombin 20210A, for an odds ratio of 6.7 (95% CI 0.9-infinity). Prothrombin 20210A may be associated with VT risk among cancer patients.     

Thrombophilic risk of individuals with rare compound factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A polymorphisms: an international case series of 100 individuals

The risk of thrombosis in individuals with rare compound thrombophilias, homozygous factor V Leiden (FVL) plus heterozygous prothrombin G20210A (PTM), homozygous PTM plus heterozygous FVL, and homozygous FVL plus homozygous PTM, is unknown. We identified, worldwide, individuals with these compound thrombophilias, predominantly through mailing members of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Physicians were sent a clinical questionnaire. Confirmatory copies of the genetic results were obtained. One hundred individuals were enrolled; 58% were female. Seventy‐one individuals had a venous thrombosis (includes superficial and deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), 4 had an arterial thrombosis and 6 had both. Nineteen individuals had never had a thrombotic event. Thrombosis‐free survival curves demonstrated that 50% of individuals had experienced a thrombotic event by 35 yrs of age, while 50% had a first venous thromboembolic event (VTE; includes all venous thrombosis except superficial thrombosis) by 41 yrs of age; 38.2% of first VTEs were unprovoked. 37% of patients had at least one VTE recurrence. Seventy percent of first pregnancies carried to term and not treated with anticoagulation were thrombosis‐free. In conclusion, patients with these rare compound thrombophilias are not exceedingly thrombogenic, even though they have a substantial risk for VTE.     

Contribution of the glycoprotein Ia 807TT, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT and prothrombin 20210GA genotypes to prothrombotic risk among factor V 1691GA (Leiden) carriers

The cooperative effects of the GPIa 807TT, MTHFR 677TT and prothrombin 20210GA genotypes with the FV Leiden 1691GA (FVL) genotype were evaluated by comparing these genotype frequencies in 77 asymptomatic and 156 symptomatic heterozygous FVL carriers. The GPIa 807TT and MTHFR 677TT genotypes did not segregate within the symptomatic FVL carrier group and did not contribute to venous thrombotic risk in this patient cohort. There was no difference in the prothrombin 20210GA genotype frequency between asymptomatic FVL carriers and a random Caucasian control group; however, the prothrombin 20210GA genotype was nearly 5 times as prevalent (19/156 v 2/77; P < 0.02) in the symptomatic FVL carriers (odds ratio 5.21; 95% confidence interval 1.20-47.62), demonstrating that this important prothrombotic risk factor acts synergistically with FVL.     

Pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in combined heterozygous factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin (FII) 20210 A mutation and in heterozygous FII single gene mutation alone

The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the absence of prophylaxis was evaluated in a retrospective study of 47 women (84 pregnancies) with combined thrombophilia [heterozygous factor V Leiden (FVL) plus prothrombin (FII) 20210A mutation (group I)] and in 82 women (193 pregnancies) with the FII alone (group II). VTE was more frequent in group I than in group II [17.8% versus 6.2%, P = 0.003, relative risk (RR) 2.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-5.9], ante partum (7.1% and 2.1%) and post partum (11.5% and 4.2%). The risk was higher in index cases than in family members (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-5.2 and RR 2.1, 95% CI 0.2-22.3 respectively) Even women who had no history of VTE before pregnancy had an increased risk (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.8). Our results suggest that, during ante partum, prophylaxis is indicated in women with combined thrombophilia and with a VTE before pregnancy. In those without VTE before pregnancy, prophylaxis might be decided for each individual case, taking into consideration all risk factors. In women with the FII mutation alone, the low risk may not justify prophylaxis in the absence of previous VTE. In post partum, prophylaxis is indicated in all cases.     

Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutation in children with cerebral thromboembolism

We investigated whether there is an association between factor V Leiden (FVL) and/or prothrombin gene G20210A mutation (PT20210A) and cerebral thromboembolism in a pediatric Argentinean population. From May 1992 to January 2002, 44 consecutive children with arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) and 23 children with cerebral sinovenous thrombosis (SVT) were prospectively studied at a single center. The prevalence of both mutations was compared with a 102 age-matched controls. In children with AIS, the frequencies (patients vs. controls), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the presence of FVL were as follows: 2.3% vs. 2%, OR/95% CI, 1.16/0.2 to 13.2; P value = 0.99. No cases of PT20210A were found in this group. In children with SVT, the frequencies (patients vs. controls), OR, and 95% CI were as follows: FVL (4.3% vs. 2%, OR/95% CI, 2.27/0.22 to 6.2; P value = 0.99) and PT20210A (4.3% vs. 1%; OR/95% CI, 4.6/0.3 to 76.3; P value = 0.3354). One child with PT20210A also had an inherited protein C deficiency. In 12 (18%) out of the 67 children with cerebral thromboembolism, without the aforementioned mutations, other prothrombotic disorders were detected. Although a multi-center prospective study with a large number of Argentinean pediatric patients is needed to obtain considerable evidence, no association between factor V Leiden and/or prothrombin gene G20210A mutation and cerebral thromboembolism was found in this pediatric series.     

Distinct association of factor V-Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations with deep venous thrombosis in Tunisia and Lebanon

Factor V G1691A (FV-Leiden) and prothrombin (PRT) G20210A single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were associated with venous thrombosis among Caucasians. We assessed the contribution of both SNPs to the genetic susceptibility of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) among Lebanese and Tunisian patients. Subjects comprised 198 DVT patients and 540 healthy controls from Lebanon and 126 Tunisian DVT patients and 197 control subjects; FV-Leiden (MnlI) and PRT G20210A (HindIII) genotyping was done by PCR-RFLP. While the prevalence of FV-Leiden mutant A allele and the G/A and A/A genotypes were significantly higher among DVT patients from Lebanon and Tunisia, the association of PRT G20210A with DVT was pronounced among Lebanese but not Tunisian patients. The prevalence of PRT G20210A mutant A allele (P < 0.001 vs. P = 181) and G/A genotype (P < 0.001 vs. P = 0.994) was significantly higher among Lebanese but not Tunisians, respectively. While FV-Leiden was a common genetic risk factor for DVT in both communities, the contribution of PRT G20210A to the genetic susceptibility of DVT differed among Lebanese and Tunisians, which underscores the need to determine prothrombotic gene polymorphisms associated with DVT among Arab and Mediterranean basin communities.     

An overview of methods for detection of factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutations

Venous thromboembolism, represented by deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a common disease with high mortality and morbidity. Within the last 25 years, risk factors for venous thromboembolism have been linked to mutations in the genes of the coagulation/anticoagulation system. Factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutations are the most prevalent inherited risk factors predisposing to venous thromboembolism in the Western world. Tests to detect these mutations are carried out when investigating a personal or family history of venous thromboembolism. At the present, there are several different methods available for the detection of these mutations in the laboratory. The choice of the method will depend on many variables. This article is aimed at reviewing the available methods for the detection of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations, their principle, applicability, advantages and disadvantages of use.     

Clinical and analytical relevance of the combination of prothrombin 20210A/A and factor V Leiden: results from a large family

We analysed the clinical and analytical features of 18 subjects from a Spanish family who bear several combinations of two prothrombotic mutations, factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin 20210A. We identified three subjects homozygous for the 20210A prothrombin mutation which additionally were heterozygous for FVL. The combination of both mutations increases the risk of developing venous thrombotic episodes at the earlier age. However, even in association with FVL, the homozygous condition of the prothrombin 20210A mutation requires additional risk factors to induce a thrombotic event. Finally, the plasma level of factor II showed a significant relationship with the prothrombin genotype.     

The risk of venous thromboembolism in family members with mutations in the genes of factor V or prothrombin or both

Factor V Leiden and the G20210A mutation in the prothrombin gene are the most frequent abnormalities associated with venous thromboembolism. It is unknown whether the risks due to the presence of either mutation are of the same magnitude. We compared the prevalence and incidence rate of venous thromboembolism in relatives with either mutation or both. The finding of different rates might influence the strategies for primary prevention of thrombosis in carriers of these mutations. The study population included 1076 relatives of probands with the prothrombin gene mutation, factor V Leiden or both who underwent screening for inherited thrombophilia and were found to be carriers of single mutations or double mutations or who were non-carriers. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 5.7% in relatives with the prothrombin gene mutation, 7.8% in those with factor V Leiden, 17.1% in those with both mutations and 2.5% in non-carriers. Annual incidences of thrombosis were 0.13% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.24], 0.19% (0.13-0.25), 0.42% (0.15-0.83) and 0.066% (0.03-0.11), respectively, and the relative risk of thrombosis was two times higher in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation, three times higher in those with factor V Leiden and six times higher in double carriers than in non-carriers. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in carriers of the prothrombin gene mutation is slightly lower than that observed in carriers of factor V Leiden, whereas in carriers of both mutations it is two or three times higher. These findings suggest that lifelong primary anticoagulant prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism is not needed in asymptomatic carriers of single or double mutations. Anticoagulant prophylaxis seems to be indicated only when transient risk factors for thrombosis coexist with mutations.     

Factor V G1691A (Leiden) and prothrombin G20210A single-nucleotide polymorphisms in type 2 diabetes mellitus

The association of the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) G1691A in coagulation factor V (FV)-Leiden and G20210A in prothrombin (PRT) genes with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were analyzed in 112 T2DM patients (58 males, 54 females; mean age 55.24 +/- 13.5 years) and 249 healthy control subjects (118 males, 131 females; mean age 53.03 +/- 13.8 years). No association was found for FV-Leiden with T2DM, as the frequency of the G/G (82.1% vs. 85.5%), G/A (17.0% vs. 14.1%), and A/A (0.9% vs. 0.4%) genotypes was not different between patients and controls, respectively (P = 0.644). Similarly, lack of association of PRT G20210A with T2DM was seen among the population studied, and the frequency of the G/G (92.9% vs. 97.2%), G/A (6.3% vs. 2.8%), and A/A (0.9% vs. 0.0%) genotypes was similar among patients and controls, respectively (P = 0.094). Neither FV-Leiden nor PRT G20210A was associated with, and no evidence for interactions between these mutations was seen in, T2DM.     

Association between adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal factor V G1691A (Leiden) and prothrombin G20210A genotypes in women with a history of recurrent idiopathic miscarriages

Thrombophilia was implicated in the development of pregnancy complications, including recurrent idiopathic pregnancy loss, and is aggravated in women who are carriers of factor V G1691A (FV Leiden) and prothrombin (PRT) G20210A single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Previous studies examined the role of FV-Leiden and PRT G20210A in recurrent pregnancy loss with conflicting results. Here we examined the prevalence of FV Leiden and PRT G20210A SNPs, in 200 women with 3 or more consecutive early (n = 87), late (n = 41), or early-late (n = 72) recurrent pregnancy losses, and 200 age-matched fertile parous control women. APC resistance (APCR) was detected functionally (measuring the activated clotting time triggered by activated factor X in presence of a fixed amount of purified APC), and FV-Leiden and PRT G20210A genotypes were assessed by PCR. The frequency of the mutant FV (0.1400 vs. 0.0276; P < 0.001) but not PRT 20210 (0.0100 vs. 0.0225; P = 0.159) allele was higher in patients than controls, respectively. APC resistance with factor V Leiden was seen in 27% of patients compared to 11.5% of controls, while APC resistance without factor V Leiden was seen in 12.5% of patients compared to 9.5% of controls. Regression analysis demonstrated that the significant predictors for early abortion was FV Leiden; those for late abortion were oral contraceptive, APCR, and FV Leiden; and predictors for early-late abortions were oral contraceptives, obesity, FV Leiden, and smoking. APC resistance and FV Leiden, as well as combination of both, are common thrombotic defects seen in women with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss, thus testing for these is recommended in women who have experienced recurrent miscarriages.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A in patients with gastric cancer

AIM: To analyze the prevalence of the two commonest thrombophilic mutations, factor V Leiden and prothrom-bin G20210A, in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-one patients with primary gastric carcinoma and 130 healthy subjects, comparable for age and sex, were investigated. Factor V Leiden was detected by using polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme digestion, and prothrombin G20210A gene mutation by allele-specific PCR. RESULTS: Among the 121 cancer patients, factor V Leiden was found in 4 cases (GA genotype: 3.3%) and prothrombin G20210A in 10 cases (GA genotype: 8.3%). Of the 130 control subjects, factor V Leiden was detected in 6 cases (GA genotype: 4.6%) and prothrombin G20210A in 8 cases (GA genotype: 6.1%). No double heterozygous carriers of both mutations were found in either group. The prevalence of both factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A variant was not statistically different between the cancer patients and the healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that, in gastric cancer, the risk factors of thrombophilic cancer state are on acquired rather than on a genetic basis and that prothrombin G20210A does not seem to be a cofactor in gastric cancer pathogenesis.     

Prevalence of factor V Leiden (G1691A) and prothrombin (G20210A) among Kurdish population from Western Iran

BACKGROUND: The mutation in factor V (FV) G1691A, known as factor V Leiden, and prothrombin (FII) gene G20210A are the two most prevalent causes of inherited thrombophilia. The present study reports the prevalence of factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A gene mutations among healthy individuals of Kurdish ethnic background in Western Iran. METHODS: Four hundred thirty-four healthy unrelated individuals, 255 male and 179 female, with a mean age of 28.7+/-15.5 from the Kermanshah Province of Iran were studied for prothrombin G20210A mutation. The factor V Leiden mutation was studied in 404 healthy individuals, of whom 232 were male and 172 were female. The factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A were detected by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment-length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method using Mnl I and Hind III restriction enzymes, respectively. RESULTS: Among 434 individuals studied for prothrombin G20210A mutation seven carried this mutation as heterozygous (four female subjects and three male), giving a prevalence of 1.6% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.5-2.7) and an allele frequency of 0.8%. No homozygous prothrombin 20210AA was found. Factor V G1691A mutation was detected as heterozygous in 11 of 404 healthy individuals (five female and six male) and as homozygous in one male indicating a prevalence of 2.97% (95% CI 1.3-4.6) and allele frequency of 1.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that the factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations are not rare among populations of Western Iran and that the relationship between venous thrombophilia and these mutations have to be further studied in Western Iran population, which, in turn, may suggest a causal effect.     

Coincidence of 20210A prothrombin variant and factor V Leiden predisposing to venous thromboembolism

Coexistence of inherited and environmental risks leads to the high hazard of venous thromboembolism. In such cases, there might be difficulties in the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent episodes. The importance of Factor V Leiden and prothrombin variant 20210A in the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolic disease, is widely accepted, but the carriership of thrombophilic genes' variants is usually not sufficient for the development of the disease. We report two cases of familial thrombophilia with concurrent presence of prothrombin variant 20210A and factor V Leiden. In a 28-year-old woman: pregnancy, immobilization, obstetric intervention appeared to precipitate the thromboembolic complication. In the second patient, the genetic studies revealed both thrombophilic mutations which could predispose to the recurrent venous thromboembolism, previously thought to be idiopathic. We discuss diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties in such patients.