共查询到2条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Aparajita Sohoni MD Danielle M. Gordon MS Farnaz Vahidnia MD MPH Douglas A. E. White MD 《Academic emergency medicine》2010,17(5):561-565
Objectives: The authors sought to determine staff satisfaction with an emergency department (ED) rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing program. Methods: A survey was conducted in an urban ED that has provided rapid HIV testing (routine screening and physician‐initiated testing) since August 2007. From May 1, 2008, to August 31, 2008, the survey was administered to all ED staff involved with HIV testing. The primary outcome was satisfaction, and secondary outcomes were the staff attitudes toward the program. Results: Surveys were administered to 215 of the 217 staff members, and 207 surveys were returned (96% response rate); 201 surveys had complete data available for analysis. The response rate by staffing type was as follows: physicians 64/64 (100%), nurses 124/134 (93%), and registration staff 16/19 (84%). The majority of ED staff (99%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 95% to 100%) were satisfied with the HIV testing program. Physicians, however, rated the program more favorably than nurses or registration staff. Most staff members agreed that HIV testing improved overall care (93%; 95% CI = 89% to 96%) and felt that HIV testing did not interfere with their ability to provide care (82%; 95% CI = 76% to 87%). The majority of staff perceived that patients were satisfied with the procedures for obtaining consent (73%; 95% CI = 67% to 79%) and with the way HIV testing was performed (83%; 95% CI = 77% to 87%). Conclusions: Emergency department staff satisfaction and overall attitudes with the HIV testing program is high. ED staff does not appear to be a barrier to program implementation. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:561–565 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine 相似文献
2.
Michael S. Lyons MD Christopher J. Lindsell PhD Jason S. Haukoos MD MSc Gregory Almond MD MPH MS Jeremy Brown MD Yvette Calderon MD MS Eileen Couture DO MS Roland C. Merchant MD MPH ScD Douglas A.E. White MD Richard E. Rothman MD PhD 《Academic emergency medicine》2009,16(2):168-177
Early diagnosis of persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) through diagnostic testing and screening is a critical priority for individual and public health. Emergency departments (EDs) have an important role in this effort. As EDs gain experience in HIV testing, it is increasingly apparent that implementing testing is conceptually and operationally complex. A wide variety of HIV testing practice and research models have emerged, each reflecting adaptations to site-specific factors and the needs of local populations. The diversity and complexity inherent in nascent ED HIV testing practice and research are associated with the risk that findings will not be described according to a common lexicon. This article presents a comprehensive set of terms and definitions that can be used to describe ED-based HIV testing programs, developed by consensus opinion from the inaugural meeting of the National ED HIV Testing Consortium. These definitions are designed to facilitate discussion, increase comparability of future reports, and potentially accelerate wider implementation of ED HIV testing. 相似文献