Combined use of frequency doubling perimetry and polarimetric measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma detection

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of the combined use of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry and polarimetry of the retinal nerve fiber layer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Seventy ocular hypertensive patients (normal optic disk and standard perimetry, elevated intraocular pressure [>21 mm Hg]), 59 patients with "preperimetric" open-angle glaucoma (glaucomatous optic disk atrophy, elevated intraocular pressure [>21 mm Hg], no visual field defect in standard perimetry), 105 patients with "perimetric" open-angle glaucoma (glaucomatous optic disk atrophy and clearly marked visual field defect), and 73 control subjects had FDT screening (protocol: C-20-5) and polarimetric measurements (GDx). Criteria for exclusion: optic disks larger than 4 mm(2), media opacities, patients younger than 33 years or older than 66 years. None of the subjects had earlier FDT perimetry. One eye of each patient and control subject entered the statistical evaluation. Database and statistical software were used for case-wise recalculation of all missed localized probability levels to create a FDT screening score. RESULTS: At a predefined specificity of 94.5% in control eyes, discrimination between "perimetric" glaucoma and normal subjects is superior using the FDT perimetry (sensitivity = 84.8%) in comparison to polarimetry (sensitivity = 63.8%), whereas sensitivity is similar with both methods in "preperimetric" patients (GDx, FDT: 25.4%). In several cases, patients classified as glaucomatous by the GDx are not the same patients as identified by the FDT perimetry. Therefore, a two-dimensional discrimination analysis can increase correct positive classification. Using a linear combination of the present FDT screening score and polarimetry ("the number"), 92.4% of "perimetric" glaucoma eyes and 44.1% of "preperimetric" glaucoma eyes have been classified as glaucomatous. CONCLUSION: Joint usage of polarimetry and FDT perimetry indicate that a combination of different techniques which can uncover different glaucoma properties, might be helpful in early glaucoma detection.     

Long-term reproducibility of screening for glaucoma with FDT-perimetry

PURPOSE: Aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term reproducibility of frequency doubling technology (FDT) screening procedures. METHODS: Longitudinal data of 433 eyes of 294 patients with no progression of glaucomatous optic disc atrophy were retrospectively analyzed: 62 control eyes, 184 ocular hypertensive eyes, 104 preperimetric, and 83 perimetric open-angle glaucoma eyes. All subjects had annual tests with the FDT perimeter and a standardized ophthalmologic examination (ie, conventional perimetry, optic disc inspection, tonometry, lens opacity measurement for exclusion of cataract). The present analysis used a published overall screening score with case-wise recalculation of missed localized probability levels. We analyzed long-term variability by correlation analysis, sign tests, and limits of agreement (LoA) as introduced by Altman and Bland. All subjects had at least 2 annual tests. Three hundred twenty-six eyes had 2 annual tests with the C-20 procedure and at least 1 test with the N-30 protocol another year later. One hundred thirty-five eyes had 1 C-20 and 2 annual tests with the N-30 protocol. RESULTS: Analyses of repeated measurements revealed a significant learning effect (P<0.001, LoA: -4, 17) between the first and second examination but no significant difference between the second and following tests with the C-20 protocol (P>0.6, LoA: +/-9). In addition, there was no significant difference between second C-20 and N-30 tests (P>0.5, LoA: -12, 6). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the variability of FDT tests over several years. Longitudinal FDT-results in a clinical study showed a higher reproducibility if the first test was discarded. Reproducibility of screening with the N-30 protocol is comparable to the C-20 procedure if an overall score is considered.     

Überschwellige periphere Stimulation bei präperimetrischen Glaukomen

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early glaucomatous visual field defects can occur outside the central 30 degrees , which is usually examined in perimetric tests used for glaucoma diagnosis and screening. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of peripheral suprathreshold stimulation in open angle glaucoma before the development of reproducible visual field damage in standard 30 degrees automatic white-on-white perimetry. METHODS: A total of 352 eyes of 352 patients (ages 35-69 years; visual acuity 0.8 or better) from the Erlanger Glaucoma Registry were included in this study. They were divided into two groups: normal eyes and preperimetric glaucoma. All patients underwent a standardized glaucoma examination including Octopus 500EZ static perimetry (G1 program, all three phases); 95 eyes of 95 patients also received a 135-point suprathreshold test pattern of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (model 750i) for detecting peripheral visual field defects. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for any single test point in phase 3 of the G1 test pattern and the Humphrey 135-point pattern. A score was calculated, and cluster analysis was performed. RESULTS: In 33 of 176 (18.8%) eyes with preperimetric glaucoma, the score was 3 or higher in phase 3 of the G1 program (normal eyes: 19 of 196; 9.7%). For both examination modalities, the highest sensitivity was found in test locations in the superior nasal midperiphery, corresponding to neuroretinal rim loss predominantly in the inferotemporal sector in early glaucomatous optic disc atrophy. CONCLUSION: Positive test results using suprathreshold stimulation in the midperiphery can be found in patients with preperimetric glaucoma at a significantly higher frequency than in normal subjects. Longitudinal studies will show whether such tests can be useful for predicting perimetric manifestation of the disease.     

Glaucoma detection with frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry

PURPOSE: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry and short-wavelength perimetry (SWAP). Moreover, to study a combination of both methods using the machine-learning technique double-bagging, which was recently established in glaucoma research. METHODS: Forty-three patients with "preperimetric" open-angle glaucoma (glaucomatous optic disc atrophy and no visual field defect in standard perimetry), 26 patients with "perimetric" open angle glaucoma (glaucomatous optic disc atrophy and visual field defect in standard perimetry), and 40 control subjects had FDT screening (protocol: C-20-5) and SWAP (Octopus 101, G2). Criteria for exclusion were color vision abnormalities, media opacities, and an age below 31 years or above 63 years. Data of 1 eye of each patient and control subject entered the statistical evaluation. A point wise evaluation of the diagnostic power of SWAP values was performed to derive spatial patterns of visual field loss. A double-bagging machine-learning algorithm was used to train classification rules on the basis of a combination of FDT scores and nerve fiber related visual field losses in SWAP. The diagnostic power of the classifiers was compared regarding their misclassification error rates and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The combination of FDT perimetry and SWAP yielded better diagnostic results compared with FDT or SWAP separately. The overall estimated misclassification error rate of the combined classifier was 24% compared with 28% for both SWAP and FDT perimetry. Regarding the estimated performance of classifier at high specificities (>80%) in control eyes as measured by the partial area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, the combination of both instruments is also superior to the individual instruments. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of SWAP and FDT perimetry, each targeting different neuronal pathways, may improve early glaucoma detection.     

Polarimetric measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma diagnosis

PURPOSE: To evaluate reliability and diagnostic value of polarimetric measurements of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in the diagnosis of glaucoma. METHODS: The study included 81 eyes with perimetric glaucoma with glaucomatous changes of the optic disc and visual field defects; 52 eyes with preperimetric glaucoma with glaucomatous optic disc abnormalities and normal achromatic visual fields; and 70 normal eyes. For determination of reliability, four examiners repeated polarimetric measurements five times in ten normal subjects. RESULTS: The polarimetric variables were significantly correlated with increasing mean visual field defect and decreasing neuroretinal rim area. In correlation analyses with visual field defects, correlation coefficients were highest for the variable "superior/nasal ratio" and "the Number," a variable calculated by the neural network of the device. In correlations with neuroretinal rim area, correlation coefficients were highest for measurements of the inferior nerve fiber layer thickness. The preperimetric glaucoma group and the control group differed significantly in the variables "superior/nasal ratio" and "the Number" and, to a smaller degree, in the variables "superior/temporal ratio" and "superior/inferior ratio." The Number variable had a sensitivity of 82% and 58% at a predefined specificity of 80% in separating perimetric glaucoma patients and preperimetric glaucoma patients, respectively, from control subjects. Reproducibility of the polarimetric measurements ranged between 70% and 89%. CONCLUSION: Polarimetric measurements of the RNFL thickness can detect glaucomatous optic nerve damage in patients with visual field loss, and in some patients with preperimetric glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Considering the fast performance, easy handling, and low maintenance costs, RNFL polarimetry may be helpful in glaucoma diagnosis.     

Learning effect and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in chronic open-angle glaucoma

PURPOSE: To prospectively study the learning effects and measurement variability in frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma patients who were well practiced in testing with an automated static perimeter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinically stable chronic open-angle glaucoma (n = 44) who had undergone repeated perimetric testing using a 30-2 full-threshold program with a Humphrey perimeter with reliable results were enrolled in the study. The authors tested each patient using frequency-doubling technology perimetry. After initial examination with the C-20-1 screening program, the N-30 full-threshold program was performed three times at 1- to 3-month intervals. RESULTS: Perimetric results of the N-30 program improved with repeated testing in both eyes between the first and second visits. The average of mean deviation (MD) of the N-30 program significantly improved by 0.6 dB ( < 0.001) in the right eye and 0.8 dB ( < 0.002) in the left eye between the first and second sessions. The sensitivity in 4 of 19 test points (right eye) and 5 of 19 points (left eye) improved significantly at the second sessions, but not the third session. There were no significant differences in the FDT results between the second and third sessions in both eyes. The standard deviation of the mean MD value for the three sessions ranged from 3.8 to 4.0 dB in both eyes.CONCLUSION: Baseline measurements for perimetric follow-up with the N-30 full-threshold program in patients with glaucoma should be repeated at least twice after testing with the C-20-1 screening program.     

Test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 screening-mode frequency doubling technology perimetry

PURPOSE: To investigate test-retest variability in glaucoma patients tested with C-20-1 (screening) Frequency Doubling Technology (FDT) perimetry. METHODS: Thirty-one glaucoma patients with a range of visual field defects (17 with mild, 11 with moderate, and 3 with severe defects by AGIS classification) and experienced in standard automated perimetry but not FDT perimetry were prospectively recruited. The C-20-1 screening mode of FDT was consecutively administered three times. Concordance between tests for each patient was measured by presence and severity of defects for each test location. Learning and/or fatigue effects were also evaluated using FDT test scores in which number and severity of defects was graded. RESULTS: Agreement between FDT test locations averaged 88% for any defect, but only 51% for severity of defect. Although the mean test score increased slightly over the three tests, subjects did not demonstrate a statistically significant change in test score across the three testings (P = 0.975). Among 17 patients with early glaucoma (AGIS score 1-5), two returned a normal initial FDT test, and four returned a normal second FDT test. CONCLUSIONS: Using C-20-1 FDT, concordance between tests at a given test location was high for the presence of any defect, which would be important in glaucoma screening, but was only fair for severity of defect. Six of 17 patients with early glaucoma returned normal tests during testing. This group of glaucoma patients with perimetric experience did not demonstrate a significant learning or fatigue effect with FDT screening perimetry.     

Frequency doubling technology and high-pass resolution perimetry in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

PURPOSE: To study the correlation between frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT) and high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP) in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma, suspect glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and in normal eyes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients (162 eyes) were studied. Visual fields were assessed by HRP, FDT screening C-20-5 and FDT threshold C-20 programs. In eyes with a discrepancy between the test results, a comprehensive clinical examination was performed, including optic disc photography and Heidelberg retinal tomography (HRT). RESULTS: There was a strong correlation between HRP global deviation and the FDT mean deviation (for FDT threshold C-20 test), and between HRP score and FDT score (for FDT screening C-20-5 ). The correlation coefficients were r = -0.83 and r = 0.77, respectively. In all, 75 eyes (46.3%) had normal HRP and FDT screening results, while 67 eyes (41.4%) showed abnormal results in both tests. In 12 eyes (7.4%) HRP was within normal limits while FDT screening was abnormal. Seven of these eyes were judged to have glaucoma; three of them had converted from ocular hypertension to glaucoma. In eight eyes (4.9%) HRP was abnormal while FDT screening was normal. Three of these were judged to have glaucoma. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of the FDT screening test for the detection of glaucoma were 91.7% and 87.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was a strong correlation between FDT threshold C-20, FDT screening C-20-5 and HRP test results. Frequency doubling technology perimetry C-20-5 represents a good screening test for the detection of optic nerve damage in open-angle glaucoma.     

Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage and to compare it between open-angle glaucoma with high pressure [high-tension glaucoma (HTG)] and those with normal pressure [normal-tension glaucoma (NTG)] groups. METHODS: FDT perimetry with the N-30 full threshold protocol and standard automated perimetry (SAP) using the Humphrey Field Analyzer with the 30-2 full threshold protocol were performed in 20 eyes of 20 HTG patients and 36 eyes of 36 NTG patients with visual field damage confirmed with SAP in only one hemifield. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographics, the Heidelberg Retina Tomography indices, and the Humphrey Field Analyzer indices between HTG and NTG groups. Regarding the FDT perimetry results, mean deviation in the global field (P=0.009) and mean sensitivity in the SAP-spared (P=0.001) and SAP-impaired (P=0.011) hemifields were lower; the numbers of FDT abnormal test points (probability of abnormality <5%) in the SAP-spared hemifield were significantly greater (P=0.005) in HTG than in NTG groups. Eyes in which FDT results of the SAP-spared hemifield were judged as abnormal was more frequent in HTG groups (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of FDT perimetry to detect early or preperimetric glaucomatous functional changes should be different between HTG and NTG eyes.     

Frequency doubling technology perimetry with the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test

PURPOSE: To assess the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test in detecting functional glaucomatous damage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One eye in each of 60 healthy individuals, 108 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 150 patients with preperimetric (48) or perimetric (102) high-tension primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were considered. Visual fields were assessed by the standard automated perimetry (SAP) Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2, frequency doubling technology (FDT) N-30, and Humphrey Matrix 30-2 tests. Significantly abnormal points in the pattern deviation probability plot, testing time, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the FDT tests were evaluated. RESULTS: FDT revealed a significantly greater percentage of depressed points than did SAP in OHT and preperimetric POAG eyes. The FDT-N-30 test showed a significantly greater percentage of areas with P < 5% in the OHT, preperimetric POAG, and early POAG groups. The Matrix-30-2 test provided an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve slightly lower than the FDT-N-30 test in the preperimetric POAG group, and significantly greater in the perimetric POAG group. CONCLUSIONS: FDT perimetry appeared more sensitive than SAP in detecting early glaucomatous VF loss. The FDT-N-30 test showed a slightly higher ability to detect early glaucomatous damage in patients at risk for the development of glaucoma, whereas the Matrix-30-2 test provided a more detailed characterization of the glaucomatous VF loss pattern, although it required 30% more time.     

Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) to detect glaucomatous damage in preperimetric glaucoma subjects. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred seventy-eight eyes of 278 subjects categorized as normal eyes [n=98; intraocular pressure <20 mm Hg, normal optic disc appearance, and standard automated perimetry (SAP)]; preperimetric glaucoma eyes (n=109; normal SAP and retinal nerve fiber layer defects or localized optic disc notching and thinning); and glaucoma patients (n=71; intraocular pressure >21 mm Hg, optic disc compatible with glaucoma, and abnormal SAP). METHODS: The preperimetric glaucoma group underwent at least 2 reliable full-threshold 24-2 Humphrey SAPs, full-threshold C-20 FDT, full-threshold 24-2 SWAP, optic disc topography using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II, laser polarimetry using the GDx VCC, and Optical Coherence Tomography (Zeiss Stratus OCT 3000). Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for the main Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, Optical Coherence Tomography, and GDx VCC parameters for the normal and glaucoma patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the parameters indicating glaucomatous damage in the optic disc or retinal nerve fiber layer, which were used to establish additional subgroups of patients with preperimetric glaucoma. FDT and SWAP sensitivities were calculated for the patient subsets with structural damage and normal SAP. RESULTS: At least 20% of the patients with preperimetric glaucoma demonstrated functional losses in FDT and SWAP. The more severe the structural damage, the greater the sensitivity for detecting glaucomatous visual field losses. CONCLUSIONS: FDT and SWAP detect functional losses in cases of suspected glaucoma before glaucomatous losses detected by SAP.     

Can the specificity of the FDT for glaucoma be improved by confirming abnormal results?

PURPOSE: To determine whether the specificity of the frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimeter in the screening mode for glaucoma can be improved by repeating abnormal screening results. METHODS: The FDT perimeter was used in C-20-5 screening mode, and the right eye was tested first. After both eyes were tested, the screening was repeated in eyes with any abnormal visual field defects on FDT perimetry. The printouts were categorized as possible visual field abnormality (zero or one miss), probable visual field abnormality (two to four misses), and definite visual field abnormality (more than five misses). A clinical ophthalmologic examination was conducted on the day of the FDT perimetry screening. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 223 people. The participants ranged in age from 23 to 91 years (mean, 68.5 years; standard deviation. 13.7 years), and 119 (53%) were women. The sensitivity of the FDT perimetry screening was 100%; both cases of glaucoma showed an abnormality on FDT perimetry both times. The specificity improved moderately from the first screening to the second screening. The specificity the first time was 62% (95% confidence interval, 53.1-71.2). The specificity the second time was 68.5% (95% confidence interval, 59.8-77.1). Improvement on FDT perimetry rescreening varied by the language spoken at home. Seven of the 19 non-English speakers without glaucoma improved on rescreening, compared with none of the 23 English speakers (P = 0.002). Seven of the 25 right eyes with FDT perimetry abnormalities both times and no glaucoma had no other detectable diseases. Three of 24 left eyes with FDT perimetry abnormalities both times and no glaucoma had no other detectable diseases. Of the 85 patients who did not have glaucoma but had FDT perimetry abnormalities both times, only one did not have some other detectable disease. DISCUSSION: In summary, the sensitivity for glaucoma of the C-20-5 screening mode is excellent, but a paradigm for screening with the FDT perimeter to improve the overall specificity for glaucoma still must be developed.     

Psychophysical investigation of ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma using a variety of psychophysical tests and to identify optimal perimetric technique(s) for detection of early glaucomatous visual function loss. METHODS: Five perimetric tests, short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), temporal modulation perimetry (TMP), frequency doubling technology perimetry (FDT), detection acuity perimetry (DAP), and resolution acuity perimetry (RAP) were compared in their ability to discriminate between normal individuals and patients with early glaucoma or glaucoma suspects. Comparisons were also made by their ability to produce repeatable defects. The tests examined different visual functions that are likely to be mediated by different retinal ganglion cell subpopulations, thereby permitting examination of hypotheses of ganglion cell death in early glaucoma. RESULTS: All visual field tests demonstrated high performance in separating glaucoma patients from normal individuals. SWAP, TMP, FDT, and DAP provided the greatest discrimination between normal individuals and high- and low-risk glaucoma suspects. However, SWAP, TMP, and FDT obtained better consistency across the various analysis approaches (global indices and pointwise) than DAP and RAP. Of all the test types, FDT exhibited the highest proportion of repeatable abnormal test locations, with poor confirmation rates achieved by DAP and RAP. CONCLUSION: The performance of SWAP, FDT, and TMP suggests that these test types may all be suitable for detection of early loss of visual function in glaucoma. Ganglion cell subpopulations with lower levels of redundancy and/or those with larger cell sizes offer the most parsimonious explanation for earliest ganglion cell losses occurring in glaucoma.     

Scanning laser polarimetry versus frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional threshold perimetry: changes during a 12-month follow-up in preperimetric glaucoma. A pilot study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility for detecting the progression in preperimetric primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) using scanning laser polarimetry (SLP), frequency-doubling technology (FDT), and conventional automated perimetry (AP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 22 eyes of 11 preperimetric POAG patients were evaluated using SLP (Nerve Fiber Analyzer, GDx), AP (Humphrey 24-2 threshold test) and FDT (30 degrees threshold test). All eyes had intraocular pressure (IOP) higher than 21 mmHg before treatment, but were consistently lower than 22 mm Hg with unchanged topical medication before and during the study. At the initial evaluation session optic nerve heads showed mild glaucomatous changes but the visual fields were normal (MD better than 2.0 dB, Glaucoma Hemifield Test: within normal limits or borderline). AP and FDT measurements were repeated 6 months later, and all three tests were repeated 12 months after the first investigation. RESULTS: IOP, AP and FDT measurements showed no statistically significant changes during the 12-month follow up period. In contrast to this, a tendency for a glaucomatous type decrease was seen with SLP in the retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness parameters (mean superior and inferior sector thickness values, ellipse average thickness and maximal modulation). The mean decrease of RNFL thickness in the superior and inferior sectors was 2.77 microm and 2.48 microm, respectively. Using the two-way nested ANOVA, which considers the relation between the right and left eyes of the subjects, the decrease was statistically significant (p=0.021) for the inferior sector RNFL thickness. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that scanning laser polarimetry is a useful technique to detect and measure glaucomatous progression in early glaucoma. Scanning laser polarimetry of the RNFL may help to detect and quantify early progression even if worsening is not seen with perimetry and FDT tests.     

Glaucomatous visual field damage. Luminance and color-contrast sensitivities

Using a modified Humphrey perimeter, we evaluated 16 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and visual field loss (defects 0.5-3.0 log units in depth), and 14 normal eyes. Each eye was tested twice in random order with conventional luminance-increment static perimetry and with the perimeter modified to produce a high-luminance yellow adapting background and a blue test stimulus. The background was a broad-spectrum light of 500 nm and above (yellow), while the stimulus was a broad-spectrum light of 500 nm and below (blue). Paired comparisons were made between conventional and blue/yellow sensitivities for every point examined (1184 points in 16 diseased eyes and 1036 points in 14 normal eyes). Defect depths were determined by using the age-corrected norms distributed in the Humphrey Statpac software. In glaucomatous eyes, blue/yellow sensitivity showed greater impairment than did conventional perimetric sensitivity, in which defect depths were less than 1.0 log unit. However, for defects greater than 1.0 log unit in depth, conventional perimetric sensitivity and blue/yellow sensitivity showed equivalent degrees of damage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the ability of blue/yellow and of conventional perimetry in distinguishing between glaucomatous and normal eyes. Results indicated that although blue/yellow color-contrast perimetry may be more sensitive for the detection of incipient glaucomatous damage, in the manifest stages of visual field damage blue/yellow color-contrast perimetry is no more sensitive than is conventional (luminance-increment) perimetry for defining the extent of glaucomatous visual field defects.     

Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry

PURPOSE: To compare the detection and assessment of progression of visual field defects in primary open-angle glaucoma with manual suprathreshold perimetry on Goldmann perimeter and automated static threshold perimetry on Humphery visual field (HVF) analyzer. METHODS: 105 eyes of 54 patients of primary open-angle glaucoma were followed up with 3-monthly perimetry on Goldmann perimeter and HVF analyzer, for a period of 9 months. RESULTS: HVF analyzer picked up visual field defects in 48 (46%) eyes whereas Goldmann perimeter picked up visual field defects in 26 (25%) eyes. HVF analyzer demonstrated progression in 14 eyes whereas Goldmann perimeter detected progression in 7 eyes during follow up of 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: HVF analyzer is superior to Goldmann perimeter to document and to demonstrate progression of visual field defects in primary open-angle glaucoma.     

Application of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma

PURPOSE: Evaluation of the frequency doubling technology perimetry in the detection of an early glaucomatous field loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients (40 eyes), who were diagnosed with ocular hypertension were enrolled in the study. The diagnosis was made based on slit lamp examination, 3 measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) over 21 mmHg. Standard perimetry was performed with Humphrey perimeter and SITA program (30-2 threshold). Then, all patients underwent FDT perimetry with 30-2 threshold program. Patients, who had any changes in FDT visual field had to repeat the test, to confirm the results. RESULTS: Out of 40 eyes with the normal white on white perimetry 5 eyes (5 patients) presented defects in FDT perimetry. They had optic disc c/d asymmetry > 0.1 and the nerve fiber layer defects corresponding to the visual field defects in FDT perimetry. CONCLUSION: Frequency Doubling Technology perimetry may be useful as a supplemental method of the visual field evaluation, particularly in patients where standard perimetry does not show any functional damage.     

Correlation between confocal tomography of the optic nerve (HRT) and the perimetric frequency doubling technology

PURPOSE AND METHODS: To correlate the five phases of optic nerve (ON) damage staging, as assessed by means of confocal tomography (HRT) with the five stages of visual field, assessed by conventional perimetry (standard automatic perimetry, SAP) and classified in five stages according to the "GLAUCOMA STAGING SYSTEM". The second step was to correlate the same optic nerve staging system with the results of the visual field tested with non-conventional perimetry using the frequency doubling technology (FDT) employing the Humphrey-Zeiss and Welch-Allyn perimeter. The five stages of FDT visual field data evolution were classified according to the new "FDT STAGING SYSTEM". MATERIAL: 58 visual fields of 58 consecutive selected patients with either ocular hypertension or glaucoma with an age-range between 15 and 65 years. METHOD: Visual field examination was performed with conventional (Octopus G2 threshold test) and non-conventional perimetry (FDT N30 threshold test), and the ON was assessed with confocal tomography (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph). RESULTS: In 40 % of the visual fields tested normal with conventional perimetry, non-conventional perimetry (FDT) detected glaucomatous visual field defects corresponding topographically with the optic nerve damage revealed by HRT. CONCLUSIONS: New non-conventional perimetric techniques such as FDT enable the very early detection of visual field defects topographically correlated to optic nerve damage.     

The usefulness of frequency doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma screening in health-check program

PURPOSE: Visual field testing has not been used as a screening procedure because it requires too much testing time and manpower. We evaluated the usefulness of Frequency Doubling Technology(FDT) visual field testing as a screening procedure for glaucoma in a health-check screening program. METHODS: A total of 800 eyes of 400 persons were examined for visual acuity, noncontact tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, funduscopy, and FDT testing of visual fields (N-30-5). The initial screening result was considered positive for glaucoma if any abnormality of FDT perimetry was detected, the intraocular pressure exceeded 21 mmHg, or funduscopy showed glaucomatous disc cupping or retinal nerve fiber layer defect. The re-examination comprised several ophthalmic examinations such as automatic perimetry 9 Humphrey field analyzer). RESULTS: Glaucoma was suspected in 118 eyes; 16 eyes were thus diagnosed after re-examination. FDT detected visual field abnormalities in 15 eyes. There were 40 eyes that were not diagnosed although FDT detected visual field abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: FDT detected visual field abnormalities in glaucoma patients with high sensitivity and specificity. FDT is a useful screening test for glaucoma.     

Prediction of visual field defects on standard automated perimetry by screening C-20-1 frequency doubling technology perimetry

PURPOSE: To determine if perimetric defects, initially seen with C-20-1 frequency doubling technology (FDT) in eyes with normal standard automated perimetry (SAP), will subsequently develop on standard automated perimetry. METHODS: Review of patients considered high-risk glaucoma suspects (GS) or with ocular hypertension (OHT), who underwent one C-20-1 FDT in 1997 or 1998. An abnormal frequency doubling technology was defined in two ways, as having either at least one, or at least two abnormal locations. An abnormal standard automated perimetry was defined as fulfilling two of three modified Anderson criteria for abnormality on two consecutive tests and at final standard automated perimetry. RESULTS: Of 63 eyes (50 patients), 18 (28.6%) had >or=1 FDT defects, and 12 (19.0%) had >or=2 defects. After follow-up of 62 +/- 26 months, an abnormal standard automated perimetry developed in 5 eyes (28%) with frequency doubling technology defects at 22 +/- 13 months (28% of eyes with >or=1 defect and 42% of eyes with >or=2 FDT defects), and in 4 of 45 eyes (9%) with normal frequency doubling technology at 32 +/- 30 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed the risk of an abnormal standard automated perimetry at 5 years with or=1 defects, and >or=2 defects, was 10.3%, 11.8%, 30.6%, and 46.4% respectively (P = 0.060 for >or=1 defects compared with no defects; P = 0.002 for >or=2 defects compared with 相似文献