Effects of removing food on maintenance of drinking initiated by pairings of sipper and food

Two experiments evaluated the effects of removing food presentations on the maintenance of drinking induced by experience with sipper — food pairings. In Exp 1, ethanol drinking was induced in non-deprived Long-Evans rats by Pavlovian conditioning procedures employing an ethanol sipper as conditioned stimulus (CS) and food pellet as unconditioned stimulus (US). The Paired/Ethanol group received presentations of the ethanol sipper CS followed immediately by the response-independent presentation of the food pellet US. The Random/Ethanol group received the ethanol sipper CS and food US randomly with respect to one another. For both groups, the concentration of ethanol in the sipper CS [(3%, 4%, 6%, 8% (vol./vol.)] was increased across sessions, and, as in previous studies employing low concentrations of ethanol in non-deprived rats (i.e., maintained with free access to food in their home cages), the two procedures induced comparable levels of sipper CS-directed ethanol drinking. Removing food US presentations had no effect on sipper CS-directed ethanol drinking in either group. In Exp 2, groups of non-deprived Long-Evans rats were trained either with water or ethanol in the sipper CS paired with food US. Removing food US presentations had no effect on ethanol drinking in the Paired/Ethanol group, but water drinking in the Paired/Water group declined systematically across sessions. Results indicate that food US presentations contribute to the maintenance of water drinking but not to the maintenance of ethanol drinking. Implications for accounts of ethanol drinking based on Pavlovian sign-tracking, behavioral economics and intermittent sipper procedures are considered.     

An inter-gender effect on ethanol drinking in rats: proximal females increase ethanol drinking in males

Three groups of male Long-Evans hooded rats were assessed for effects of social opportunity on drinking of ethanol or water. The ethanol/female group received intermittent presentations of a sipper containing ethanol that was followed by 15 s of social interaction opportunity with a female rat. The ethanol/male group received similar training except the social interaction opportunity was with a male rat. The water/female group received training similar to the ethanol/female group except that the sipper contained water. For the ethanol groups, the concentration of ethanol [3%, 4%, 6%, 8% and 10% (vol/vol)] in the sipper was increased across sessions. With 10% ethanol in the sipper, social opportunity with females induced more drinking and ethanol intake than did social opportunity with males. Social opportunity with females induced more intake of ethanol than water. Post-session plasma samples revealed social opportunity with females induced higher corticosterone and testosterone levels than did social opportunity with males, irrespective of the sipper fluid. This study documents, for the first time, an inter-gender effect on ethanol drinking in rats.     

Intermittent exposure to a social stimulus enhances ethanol drinking in rats

The present experiment evaluates the effects of intermittent exposure to a social stimulus on ethanol and water drinking in rats. Four groups of rats were arranged in a 2x2 factorial design with 2 levels of Social procedure (Intermittent Social vs Continuous Social) and 2 levels of sipper Liquid (Ethanol vs Water). Intermittent Social groups received 35 trials per session. Each trial consisted of the insertion of the sipper tube for 10 s followed by lifting of the guillotine door for 15 s. The guillotine door separated the experimental rat from the conspecific rat in the wire mesh cage during the 60 s inter-trial interval. The Continuous Social groups received similar procedures except that the guillotine door was raised during the entire duration of the session. For the Ethanol groups, the concentrations of ethanol in the sipper [3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16% (vol/vol)] increased across sessions, while the Water groups received 0% ethanol (water) in the sipper throughout the experiment. Both Social procedures induced more intake of ethanol than water. The Intermittent Social procedure induced more ethanol intake at the two highest ethanol concentration blocks (10-12% and 14-16%) than the Continuous Social procedure, but this effect was not observed with water. Effects of social stimulation on ethanol drinking are discussed.     

Effects of ethanol on Pavlovian autoshaping in rats

 Approach responses, consummatory behaviors, and directed motor responses maintained by food reward resemble autoshaping CRs and are increased by lower doses of ethanol. This study evaluated the effects of presession IP injections of ethanol doses (0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.70, or 1.00 g/kg) on the acquisition of lever-press autoshaping CR performance in groups of male Long-Evans hooded rats. Paired groups received 15 daily sessions of Pavlovian autoshaping procedures, wherein the insertion of a retractable lever for 5 s (CS) was followed by the response-independent presentation of food (US). Ethanol facilitated lever-press autoshaping CR acquisition, as revealed by dose-related increases in the number of trials on which CRs were performed. The form of the dose-effect curve was inverted U-shaped with maximal responding induced during sessions 1–5 by the 0.70 g/kg ethanol dose. A similar dose-effect curve was observed during sessions 11–15, revealing that the effects of ethanol on autoshaping CR performance were relatively stable. A pseudoconditioning control group injected presession with 0.50 g/kg ethanol received training wherein the food US was presented randomly with respect to the lever CS. Few lever-presses were performed by the Random 0.50 group, indicating that ethanol’s effects on autoshaping CR acquisition and maintenance observed in the Paired 0.50 group were not due to its psychomotor activating effects. A non-injection control group performed more autoshaping CRs than did the control group injected presession with saline, indicating that daily presession IP injections per se suppress autoshaping CR performance. Results reveal that low doses of ethanol enhance Pavlovian conditioning of directed motor and consummatory-like responding maintained by food reward. Implications for autoshaping accounts of impulsivity and drug abuse are considered. Received: 15 December 1997 / Final version: 27 March 1998     

Pavlovian autoshaping procedures increase plasma corticosterone levels in rats

Pavlovian autoshaping conditioned responses (CRs) are complex sequences of conditioned stimulus (CS)-directed skeletal-motor responses that are elicited by CS objects predictive of food unconditioned stimulus (US). Autoshaping CRs are observed under conditions known to be conducive to elevations in plasma corticosterone levels, as, for example, in response to the eating of food as well as in response to signals predictive of food. Two experiments investigated the relationships between Pavlovian autoshaping procedures, the performance of Pavlovian autoshaping CRs, and plasma corticosterone levels in male Long-Evans rats. In Experiment 1, rats in the CS-US paired group (n=30) were given 20 daily sessions of Pavlovian autoshaping training wherein the insertion of a retractable lever CS was followed by the response-independent presentation of the food US. Tail blood samples obtained after the 20th autoshaping session revealed higher plasma corticosterone levels in the CS-US paired group than in the CS-US random control group (n=10). In Experiment 2, rats (n=35) were assessed for basal plasma corticosterone levels 2 weeks prior to autoshaping training. Plasma samples obtained immediately following the first autoshaping session, and prior to the acquisition of lever-press autoshaping CR performance, revealed higher plasma corticosterone levels in the CS-US paired group (n=24) relative to basal levels. This effect was not observed in the CS-US random control group (n=11). Data suggest that corticosterone release is a physiological endocrine Pavlovian CR induced by lever CS-food US pairings during Pavlovian autoshaping procedures, rather than a by-product of autoshaping CR performance. Implications of the link between autoshaping procedures and corticosterone release are discussed.     

Initiation of ethanol self-administration in the rat using sucrose substitution in a sipper-tube procedure

Rationale: The concepts of appetitive and consummatory behaviors provide a framework for examining ethanol-drinking behavior. However, traditional studies of ethanol self-administration using dipper procedures make separating the appetitive from the consummatory components difficult. Objective: This study compared the ability to initiate ethanol self-administration using a new sipper-tube self-administration procedure with the older established sucrose-substitution initiation model that employed dipper presented reinforcement. The new model was developed to allow for an assessment of the appetitive and consummatory components in ethanol self-administration. Methods: For the sipper-tube procedure, the rats were initiated to self-administer ethanol using a sucrose-substitution procedure that provided limited access to a sipper tube containing ethanol. This procedure required the completion of a fixed ratio requirement (FR4) in order to gain access to a sipper tube for 20 min. Initially, a 20% sucrose solution with no ethanol was provided in the sipper tube. Over sessions, the concentration of sucrose was reduced and the ethanol concentration increased, until 10% ethanol in water was the solution presented. A second group of animals was initiated to self-administer ethanol using the dipper-presentation procedure employed in our laboratory for many years. This group was used for comparison of the effectiveness of initiation in the sipper-tube procedure. Results: Following initiation, the sipper-tube rats self-administered 10% ethanol in water with intakes averaging 0.75 g/kg during the 20-min drinking period. Increasing the ethanol concentrations as high as 20%, increased intakes as high as 1.5 g/kg. The ethanol intakes observed were similar to those obtained with the dipper initiation procedure but occurred in one-third of the time. Conclusions: The sipper-tube procedure employed here results in similar ethanol self-administration behavior as has been found with a dipper presentation procedure. More importantly, however, it allows for a separation of the appetitive and consummatory components of ethanol self-administration. This separation may prove useful for examining the strength of ethanol-seeking behaviors without the confound of increasing levels of ethanol interacting with the appetitive seeking behaviors. Received: 11 January 1999 / Final version: 28 June 1999     

Flavor quality and ethanol concentration affect ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences

A previous report showed that outbred rats acquired preferences for a sweetened conditioned stimulus (CS) flavor paired with intragastric ethanol. To evaluate the role of sweet taste in ethanol conditioning, this study compared training with sweetened and unsweetened flavors. In Experiment 1, nondeprived rats were trained to drink one flavored solution (CS+, e.g., grape) paired with intragastric infusion of 5% ethanol and another (CS-, e.g., cherry) paired with intragastric water on alternate days. The volume of ethanol solution infused was matched to the volume of flavored solution the rats consumed. The sweet group's flavors initially contained 0.2% saccharin, reduced to 0.1%, 0.05%, and 0% over days; the plain group's flavors were unsweetened. The sweet group drank more and self-infused more ethanol during training and its preference for the CS+ over the CS- (without saccharin) exceeded that of the plain group (75% versus 62%). Experiment 2 equated total ethanol intake in rats trained with two combinations of flavor quality and ethanol concentration. The Sweet5 group drank flavors with 0.2% saccharin throughout training and tests and received 5% ethanol when they drank CS+, while the Plain10 group drank unsweetened flavors and the CS+ was paired with 10% ethanol. Despite equal daily ethanol doses, the Sweet5 group strongly preferred the CS+ (89%) while the Plain10 group avoided it (31%). The two groups continued to show opposite CS+ preference profiles even when both were tested with sweet CS flavors and 10% ethanol infusions. Thus, sweet taste contributes to the development of ethanol-conditioned flavor preferences, and this effect is not explained by a simple enhancement of ethanol intake.     

Dopamine D3 receptor knockout mice and the motivational effects of ethanol

Dopamine D3 receptors have been implicated in the behavioral effects of abused drugs including ethanol. The present experiments characterized the acquisition of ethanol-induced place conditioning and ethanol self-administration in D3 knockout (D3 KO) mice compared with C57BL/6J (C57) mice. For place conditioning, D3 KO and C57 mice received six pairings of a tactile stimulus with ethanol (3 g/kg i.p.). D3 KO mice showed higher basal locomotor activity levels in comparison with the C57 mice during conditioning. Ethanol produced similar magnitudes of conditioned place preference in both genotypes. In a two-bottle drinking procedure, mice of each genotype received 24 h access to water and either 3% or 10% v/v ethanol. No difference was noted between D3 KO and C57 mice in either consumption or preference. In an operant self-administration procedure using 23 h sessions, D3 KO and C57 mice received access to 10% v/v ethanol on an FR4 schedule of reinforcement, food on an FR1 schedule of reinforcement and water from a sipper tube. D3 KO and C57 mice had similar response rates of ethanol and food as well as similar water intakes. Overall, these results indicate that elimination of D3 receptor function has little influence on ethanol reward or intake.     

Ethanol induces impulsive-like responding in a delay-of-reward operant choice procedure: impulsivity predicts autoshaping

 Autoshaping conditioned responses (CRs) are reflexive and targeted motor responses expressed as a result of experience with reward. To evaluate the hypothesis that autoshaping may be a form of impulsive responding, within-subjects correlations between performance on autoshaping and impulsivity tasks were assessed in 15 Long-Evans hooded rats. Autoshaping procedures [insertion of retractable lever conditioned stimulus (CS) followed by the response-independent delivery of food (US)] were followed by testing for impulsive-like responding in a two-choice lever-press operant delay-of-reward procedure (immediate small food reward versus delayed large food reward). Delay-of-reward functions revealed two distinct subject populations. Subjects in the Sensitive group (n=7) were more impulsive-like, increasing immediate reward choices at longer delays for large reward, while those in the Insensitive group (n=8) responded predominantly on only one lever. During the prior autoshaping phase, the Sensitive group had performed more autoshaping CRs, and correlations revealed that impulsive subjects acquired the autoshaping CR in fewer trials. In the Sensitive group, acute injections of ethanol (0, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 1.50 g/kg) given immediately before delay-of-reward sessions yielded an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve with increased impulsivity induced by the 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 g/kg doses of ethanol, while choice strategy of the Insensitive group was not influenced by ethanol dose. Ethanol induced impulsive-like responding only in rats that were flexible in their response strategy (Sensitive group), and this group also performed more autoshaping CRs. Data support the hypothesis that autoshaping and impulsivity are linked. Received: 30 September 1997 / Final version: 20 February 1998     

Flavor preference conditioning by oral self-administration of ethanol

 Oral self-administration and operant tasks have been used successfully to confirm ethanol′s positive reinforcing effects in rats. However, in flavor conditioning tasks, ethanol is typically found to have aversive effects. The present studies explored this apparent paradox by examining the change in value of a flavor paired with orally self-administered ethanol in two different limited-access procedures. Rats were food-deprived and trained to drink (experiment 1) or to barpress for (experiment 2) 10% (v/v) ethanol during daily 30-min sessions using prandial initiation techniques. All rats were then exposed to a differential flavor conditioning procedure in which banana or almond extract was added to the drinking solution. One flavor (counterbalanced) was always mixed with ethanol (CS+), whereas the other flavor was mixed with water (CS–). By the end of conditioning, rats in both experiments drank more flavored ethanol than flavored water, confirming ethanol’s efficacy as a reinforcer. Moreover, barpress rates for CS+ exceeded those for CS– in the operant task. Ethanol doses self-administered in final sessions averaged about 1 g/kg. The effect of the flavor-ethanol contingency was assessed in preference tests that offered a choice between the two flavor solutions without ethanol. In both experiments, subjects developed a preference for the flavor that had been paired with ethanol. Thus, the outcome of flavor conditioning was consistent with that of the oral self-administration tasks in providing evidence of ethanol’s rewarding effects. These experiments confirm and extend previous studies showing that flavor aversion is not the inevitable result of flavor-ethanol association in rats. It seems likely that ethanol’s nutrient and pharmacological effects both contributed to the development of conditioned flavor preference. Received: 15 February 1997 / Final version: 11 June 1997     

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric ethanol with limited access training

In a prior study, ad libitum fed rats learned a strong preference (90%) for a flavored saccharin solution (conditioned stimulus, CS+) paired with concurrent intragastric (IG) infusions of 5% ethanol over another flavor (CS-) paired with water infusions in unlimited access sessions (22 h/day). The present study expanded the investigation of ethanol-conditioned preferences to limited access sessions (30 min/day). Experiment 1 revealed that ad lib or food-restricted rats failed to develop a CS+ preference using the same CS solutions (0.05% Kool-Aid+0.2% saccharin) and IG infusions that were effective with long-term training. Experiments 2 and 3 mimicked the parameters from a report of successful ethanol conditioning in deprived rats: ethanol (0.5 g/kg) or water was infused intragastrically 5 min before access to sweetened CS solutions flavored with HCl or NaCl. Rats learned to prefer the ethanol-paired CS+ when the flavors were mixed with 5% sucrose but not when mixed with 0.2% saccharin. Experiment 4 revealed that 5% sucrose solutions flavored with 0.25% Kool Aid also supported flavor preference conditioning by IG ethanol (0.5 g/kg). CS+ preferences were obtained in rats trained with ethanol infused 5 min before or concurrent with CS+ intake, but not in rats trained with ethanol infused 30 min before CS+ intake. These data confirm that flavor preferences can be conditioned by IG ethanol using a limited access procedure. However, in contrast to 22 h/day training, 30 min/day training requires more intense CS flavors and a nutritive sweetener. The preference reinforcing actions of ethanol may develop slowly and are thus most effective with long training sessions or when intense CS flavors are used in short training sessions.     

Chronic alcohol consumption in alcohol-preferring P rats attenuates subsequent conditioned taste aversion produced by ethanol injections

Rats of the P line were tested for the development of tolerance to the aversive effects of ethanol during 33 days of continuous availability of food, water and a 10% (v/v) ethanol solution. Beginning on the day following the removal of ethanol, five daily conditioned taste aversion (CTA) trials were administered to the ethanol-drinking P rats and an ethanol-naive control group. The CTA trials consisted of a 20-min access to a Polycose solution, followed by IP injection of saline, 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 g ethanol/kg. The ethanol-drinking rats developed a preference for the Polycose solution when it was paired with 0.5 g ethanol injections, but the control rats did not. Both control and ethanol groups had similar CTAs at the 1.5 g dose. However, at the 1.0 g dose, the ethanol group had an attenuated CTA compared with the water control group. The results suggest that P rats develop tolerance to aversive effects of ethanol during chronic drinking. This tolerance could contribute to the high ethanol intake in these selectively-bred rats.     

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusion of ethanol in rats

Sprague-Dawley rats were trained 22 h/day to associate a flavored solution [conditioned stimulus (CS+)] with intragastric infusions of 6% ethanol and another flavored solution (CS-) with water infusions. The infusions were matched to the CS intakes so that the animals determined their timing and size. In Phase 1, chow and water were available ad libitum, and both CS flavors were initially sweetened with saccharin that was then faded out. The rats displayed a preference for the CS+ over the CS- under both reinforced and extinction conditions. When food-restricted in Phase 2, the rats displayed an increased preference for the CS+. In Phase 3, the rats were fed ad libitum chow and given preference tests with the CS+ paired with ethanol infusions of increasing concentration (6%, 12%, 18%, and 24%). Their preference for the CS+ over the CS- persisted, and self-administered ethanol dose increased with concentration to 5 g/kg/day. The ethanol-based conditioned flavor preference resembled those conditioned by carbohydrate and fat infusions, suggesting that at least some of reinforcing ability of ethanol may be related to its postingestive nutritive effects.     

Autoshaping in adolescence enhances sign-tracking behavior in adulthood: impact on ethanol consumption

Autoshaping refers to a procedure during which a cue repeatedly paired with a reward elicits a conditioned response directed at either the reward delivery location (“goal-tracking”) or the cue itself (“sign- tracking”). Individual differences in expression of sign-tracking behavior may be predictive of voluntary ethanol intake. The present study was designed to explore the development of differences in sign-tracking behavior in adolescent and adult male and female rats in an 8-day autoshaping procedure. Consistency of sign-tracking and goal-tracking across age was examined by retesting adolescents again in adulthood and comparing their adult data with animals tested only as adults to explore pre-exposure effects on adult responding. In order to assess the relationship between sign-tracking and ethanol intake, voluntary ethanol consumption was measured in an 8-day, 2-hr limited access drinking paradigm following the 8-day autoshaping procedure in adulthood. Animals tested as adolescents showed notably less sign-tracking behavior than animals tested as adults, and sign-tracking behavior was not correlated across age. Animals exposed to the autoshaping procedure as adolescents demonstrated greater sign-tracking behavior as adults when compared to control animals tested only in adulthood. When examining the relationship in adulthood between sign-tracking and ethanol intake, an increase in ethanol intake among sign-trackers was found only in animals pre-exposed to autoshaping as adolescents. Whether or not these results reflect an adolescent-specific experience effect is unclear without further work to determine whether comparable pre-exposure effects are seen if the initial autoshaping sessions are delayed into adulthood.     

Food,water and ethanol consumption by rats under a fixed-interval schedule of food presentation

Rats could lever press 24 hours a day for 97 mg food pellets under a fixed-interval (FI) 90 second schedule. During the first 4 days, an ethanol solution was the only available fluid, after which both water and ethanol solutions were available. At ethanol concentrations (w/v) of 5%, 7.5% and 10%, total caloric intake and total fluid intake remained constant, while ethanol consumption was inversely proportional to the concentration of the solution. When the FI 90 s schedule was changed to FI 45 s, or to FI 180 s, there were only small changes in total caloric intake, total fluid intake and in percentages of total fluid consumptipn and total caloric intake as ethanol. The data suggest that the intake of ethanol under this fixed-interval schedule depends more on the ethanol concentration than on the calories obtained from ethanol drinking.     

Lack of operant ethanol self-administration in dopamine D2 receptor knockout mice

RATIONALE: Dopamine D2 receptors are postulated to play an important role in modulating the reinforcing effects of abused drugs including ethanol. OBJECTIVES: This experiment examined operant ethanol self-administration in dopamine D2 receptor knockout (KO) mice and wild-type (WT) mice using a continuous access procedure. METHODS: Adult male KO and WT mice were trained in 30-min sessions to perform a lever press response for access to 10% v/v ethanol. After training, the mice were placed in test chambers on a continuous (23 h/day) basis with access to food (one lever press, i.e., FR1), 10% v/v ethanol (four lever presses, i.e., FR4), and water from a sipper tube (phase 1). After 30 consecutive sessions, response patterns were determined for 0, 5, 10, 20 and 30% v/v ethanol (phase 2). Saccharin (0.2% w/v) was subsequently added to the ethanol mixture and responding was examined for 0, 5, 10 and 20% ethanol (phase 3). RESULTS: During phase 1, WT mice displayed higher ethanol-lever responding compared to KO mice. Food lever responding and water intake was the same in both genotypes. During phase 2, WT mice displayed concentration-dependent ethanol lever responding, whereas KO mice responded at low rates regardless of ethanol concentration. WT mice also responded more for food compared to KO mice. Each genotype showed similar water intakes except at the 20% ethanol concentration, where WT mice had lower intakes. During phase 3, WT mice continued to show higher responding for all concentrations including saccharin alone. WT mice also continued to respond more for food compared to KO mice, but drank less water. In each phase, WT mice displayed episodic (bout) responding on the ethanol lever. KO mice did not respond for ethanol in bouts. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced responding in the KO mice for several reinforcers including ethanol indicates a more general role for dopamine D2 receptors in motivated responding rather than a specific role in ethanol reinforcement.     

Induction and maintenance of ethanol self-administration without food deprivation in the rat

Rats were trained to lick at a drinking tube containing 5% ethanol to obtain access to a 0.1-ml dipper containing 20% sucrose. Following 20 of these drinking sessions, a lever press response was shaped and maintained with ethanol presentation in the dipper. This induction procedure resulted in rats responding on a FR 8 schedule of reinforcement to receive 40% (v/v) ethanol. Ethanol intakes over 0.5 g/kg in 30 min were obtained when ethanol concentrations over 10% were available. These intakes frequently resulted in blood ethanol levels over 100 mg ethanol/dl blood. This contingent sucrose induction procedure did not use food deprivation at any time. It is suggested that this procedure can be used to investigate the processes involved with the initiation of ethanol as a reinforcer independent of food restriction procedures.     

Ethanol elimination rates in normal and ethanol dependent animals.

Ethanol elimination rates were determined in rats using an intravenous route of ethanol administration after several experimental manipulations. Twenty-four hr food deprivation resulted in a 30% reduction to 35 mg/100ml blood/hr in elimination rate from a non-deprived rate of 50 mg/100 ml blood/hr. After 2 months of ethanol drinking (5% v/v), 24 hr starvation resulted in only a 10% reduction in elimination rate (45 mg/100 ml blood/hr), and did not increase the non-food-deprived rate (49.2 mg/100 ml blood/hr) over that obtained in the above animals' drinking water rather than 5% ethanol. Animals which chronically overdrank ethanol or water for 3 months on a schedule-induced polydipsia procedure, known to result in ethanol physical dependence, showed a decreased rate of ethanol elimination (37.9 mg/100 ml blood/hr for water drinkers) in the non-food-deprived condition. By providing 750 mg of liver powder daily as a food supplement in the ethanol overdrinking regimen, the ethanol elimination rate remained at a rate comparable to the normal animal (48.4 mg/100 ml blood/hr).     

Characteristics of ethanol drinking patterns under schedule-induced polydipsia

Rats were induced to consume concentrations of ethanol between 5% and 10% (w/v) using the schedule-induced polydipsia technique. Although the substitution of ethanol solutions for water disrupted the usual post-pellet pattern of drinking, large amounts of ethanol were consumed and sound-induced convulsions were observed during ethanol withdrawal. In subsequent experiments, other rats chose 5% and sometimes 10% ethanol solutions over water where both water and ethanol were freely available during the first session of exposure to ethanol. Convulsions and wild running behavior could be observed in some of these rats after only 8 days of drinking, even though ethanol was freely available at all times. Use of the schedule-induced polydipsia technique served to bring the rats into early contact with the ethanol, but rats that received the same number of food pellets in a dish rather than by the schedule drank almost as much ethanol as did the rats receiving ethanol by the schedule. Rats with free access to food pellets drank very little ethanol.     

Effects of acute and chronic administration of delta 9-tetrahy-drocannabinol or cocaine on ethanol intake in a rat model.

The acute and chronic administration of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) or cocaine were studied in rats trained to obtain all of their daily food by lever pressing during four equally-spaced 30-min periods with water and 5% or 7.5% ethanol solutions freely available. With 5% ethanol available, rats consumed almost all of their daily fluid intake as ethanol, while with 7.5% ethanol available, rats consumed water and ethanol solution in approximately equal amounts. Rats consumed more food pellets with 7.5% ethanol available than with 5% ethanol available. Acute administration of delta 9-THC produced a dose-dependent decrease of 5% ethanol intake and food pellets consumed with a small increase in water intake, especially after the higher doses. Acute administration of delta 9-THC also depressed food intake when 7.5% ethanol was available, but decreases in ethanol solution intake were small. Chronic administration of delta 9-THC initially decreased ethanol intake, but tolerance occurred to this effect, so that during chronic delta 9-THC administration ethanol intake not only recovered, but increased above control levels. When the chronic administration of delta 9-THC was discontinued, ethanol intake was increased for 1 (5% ethanol) to 3 (7.5% ethanol) weeks. Animals with initially high, or initially low, but not with initially moderate ethanol intake, accounted for the increased ethanol intake during chronic delta 9-THC administration and withdrawal. Acute cocaine administration, at doses up to 30 mg/kg, had little effect on eating and drinking; however, during chronic cocaine administration, ethanol intake gradually increased, an increase which was sustained during cocaine withdrawal. The increased ethanol drinking was confined to the first 6-h period after cocaine administration. These data suggest that the chronic administration and withdrawal of other drugs can increase ethanol intake in this rat model.