胞黏蛋白对结直肠癌细胞增殖的影响及作用机制的初步探讨

目的:探讨胞黏蛋白在人结直肠癌细胞增殖中的作用及可能的作用机制.方法:分别采用RT-PCR法和免疫荧光法检测结直肠癌HT-29、HCT-116、SW620和SW480细胞中胞黏蛋白的表达情况.MTT法检测阻断剂SecinH3阻断胞黏蛋白,或小分子干扰RNA(small interfering RNA,siRNA)干扰胞黏蛋白-2(ARNO)表达后对HT-29细胞增殖的影响.蛋白质印迹法检测SecinH3阻断或ARNO-siRNA干扰对HT-29细胞中表皮生长因子受体(epidermal growth factor receptor,EGFR)通路分子激活情况的影响,对HCT-116细胞中胰岛素样生长因子Ⅰ型受体(insulin-like growth factor type Ⅰ receptor,IGF-IR)通路分子激活情况的影响.结果:胞黏蛋白的4个亚型在HT-29、HCT-116、SW620和SW480细胞中均有表达:其中以ARNO的表达量较高;SecinH3处理HT-29细胞后使细胞生长受到抑制,作用72 h后细胞增殖抑制率达(57.22±1.01)％,ARNO- siRNA干扰ARNO蛋白的表达亦能使该肿瘤细胞的增殖受到抑制,ARNO- siRNA转染HT-29细胞48 h后,其细胞增殖抑制率为(58.95±3.42)％.蛋白质印迹法检测结果提示,阻断剂SecinH3及ARNO-siRNA均能下调结直肠癌细胞中ARNO蛋白的表达,使HT-29细胞中EGFR信号通路、HCT-116细胞中的IGF-IR信号通路受到抑制,其相应的下游信号通路因子亦出现明显的下调.结论:胞黏蛋白与EGFR或IGF-IR信号通路的活化具有相关性,其有可能成为结直肠癌治疗的一个新的靶点.     

The effect of a dimeric Affibody molecule (ZEGFR:1907)2 targeting EGFR in combination with radiation in colon cancer cell lines

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently overexpressed in colorectal cancer and is therefore an attractive target for treatment. (ZEGFR:1907)2 is a newly developed dimeric affibody molecule with high affinity to the extracellular part of EGFR. In this study, we evaluated the cytotoxic effects of (ZEGFR:1907)2 in combination with external radiation and the possible inhibitory effects in the EGFR signalling pathways in the colon cancer cell lines HT-29 and HCT116. The effects were compared with an EGFR antibody (cetuximab) and the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib and sunitinib). These cell lines are genotypically different with respect to e.g. KRAS and BRAF mutational status, recently shown to be of clinical significance for therapeutic effects. Both cell lines express approximately 100,000-150,000 EGFRs per cell but differ in the radiation response (HCT116, SF2=0.28 and HT-29, SF2=0.70). Exposure to (ZEGFR:1907)2 produced a small, but significant, reduction in survival in HCT116 but did not affect HT-29 cells. Similar results were obtained after exposure to EGF and the EGFR antibody cetuximab. The EGFR tyrosine kinase targeting inhibitor erlotinib and the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib reduced survival in both cell lines. However, none of the drugs had any significant radiosensitizing effects in combination with radiation. Akt and Erk are central proteins in the EGFR downstream signalling and in the cellular response to ionizing radiation. The activation of Akt (Ser 473) and Erk (Thr202/Tyr204) by radiation was both dose- and time-dependent. However the activation of EGFR was not clearly affected by radiation. Neither (ZEGFR:1907)2 nor any of the other drugs were able to completely inactivate Akt or Erk. On the contrary, erlotinib stimulated Akt phosphorylation in both cell lines and in HCT116 cells Erk was activated. Overall the results illustrate the complexity in response to radiation and drugs in cells with differential phenotypic status.     

RPR-115135, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor,increases 5-FU- cytotoxicity in ten human colon cancer cell lines: role of p53

A new non peptidic farnesyltransferase inhibitor, RPR-115135, in combination with 5-FU was studied in 10 human colon cancer cell lines (HCT-116, RKO, DLD-1, Colo-320, LoVo, SW-620, HT-29, HCT-15, Colo-205 and KM-12) carrying several mutations but well characterized for p53 and Ras status. We found that there was a slight tendency (not statistically significant) for the p53 inactivated cells to be less sensitive to 5-FU after 6 days continuous treatment. Simultaneous administration of RPR-115135 and 5-FU, at subtoxic concentrations, resulted in a synergistic enhancement of 5-FU cytotoxicity in the p53 wildtype cells (HCT-116, RKO, DLD-1, Colo-320, LoVo). In the p53 mutated cells (SW-620, HT-29, HCT-15, Colo-205, KM-12) the effect was very complicated. In HCT-15 the combination resulted in antagonism, in KM-12 in antagonism or in synergy (at different concentrations) and in SW-620, HT-29 and Colo-205 cells in synergy but only when 5-FU was administered at high concentrations. Growth inhibition could be accounted for on the basis of a specific cell cycle arrest phenotype (G2-M arrest), as assayed by flow cytometry, only in the p53 functioning cell lines. The combination RPR-115135 + 5-FU increases apoptotic events only in these cell lines. In the mutated cell lines no major alterations on cell cycle arrest phenotype and no induction of apoptosis was observed. Although RPR-115135 can potentiate the effect of 5-FU in cells in which p53 function is disrupted, these data suggest strongly that RPR-115135 significantly enhances the efficacy of 5-FU only when p53 is functioning.     

Cetuximab potentiates oxaliplatin cytotoxic effect through a defect in NER and DNA replication initiation

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that the chemotherapeutic action of oxaliplatin, a third generation platinum derivative, is improved when combined with cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptors. To explore the mechanism of this synergistic benefit, we used HCT-8 and HCT-116, two human colon cancer cell lines, respectively, responsive and non-responsive to the oxaliplatin/cetuximab combination. We examined the effect of drug exposure on glutathione-S-transferase-mediated oxaliplatin detoxification, DNA-platinum adducts formation, cell cycle distribution, apoptosis, and the expression of multiple targets involved in DNA replication, recombination, and repair. The major changes we found in HCT-8 were a stimulation of oxaliplatin-DNA adduct formation associated with reduced expression of the key enzyme (excision repair cross complementation group1: ERCC1) in the key repair process of oxaliplatin-DNA platinum adduct, the nucleotide excision repair (NER), both at the mRNA and protein levels. We also observed a reduced expression of factors involved in DNA replication initiation, which correlates with an enrichment of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle as well as an acceleration of apoptosis. None of these changes occurred in the non-responsive HCT-116 cell that we used as a negative control. These findings support the fact that cetuximab potentiates the oxaliplatin-mediated cytotoxic effect as the result of inhibition of NER and also DNA replication initiation.     

Epidermal growth factor receptor activity determines response of colorectal cancer cells to gefitinib alone and in combination with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Up to now, there have been no established predictive markers for response to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER1/erbB1) inhibitors alone and in combination with chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. To identify markers that predict response to EGFR-based chemotherapy regimens, we analyzed the response of human colorectal cancer cell lines to the EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib (Iressa, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE), as a single agent and in combination with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cell viability was assessed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and crystal violet cell viability assays and analyzed by ANOVA. Apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, and caspase 3 cleavage. EGFR protein phosphorylation was detected by Western blotting. RESULTS: Cell lines displaying high constitutive EGFR phosphorylation (a surrogate marker for EGFR activity) were more sensitive to gefitinib. Furthermore, in cell lines exhibiting low constitutive EGFR phosphorylation, an antagonistic interaction between gefitinib and oxaliplatin was observed, whereas in cell lines with high basal EGFR phosphorylation, the interaction was synergistic. In addition, oxaliplatin treatment increased EGFR phosphorylation in those cell lines in which oxaliplatin and gefitinib were synergistic but down-regulated EGFR phosphorylation in those lines in which oxaliplatin and gefitinib were antagonistic. In contrast to oxaliplatin, 5-FU treatment increased EGFR phosphorylation in all cell lines and this correlated with synergistic decreases in cell viability when 5-FU was combined with gefitinib. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that phospho-EGFR levels determine the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to gefitinib alone and that chemotherapy-mediated changes in phospho-EGFR levels determine the nature of interaction between gefitinib and chemotherapy.     

Treatment of human colon cancer xenografts with TRA-8 anti-death receptor 5 antibody alone or in combination with CPT-11.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo efficacy of TRA-8, a mouse monoclonal antibody that binds to the DR5 death receptor for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (also called Apo2L), alone and in combination with CPT-11, against human colon cancer cells and xenografts. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: DR5 expression was assessed on human colon cancer cell lines using flow cytometry, and cellular cytotoxicity after TRA-8 treatment, alone and in combination with SN-38, was determined by measuring cellular ATP levels. Tumor growth inhibition and regression rates of well-established subcutaneous COLO 205, SW948, HCT116, and HT-29 colon cancer xenografts in athymic nude mice treated with TRA-8 or CPT-11 alone and in combination were determined. (99m)Tc-TRA-8 was used to examine tumor localization of TRA-8 in animals bearing each of the four xenografts. In addition, whole-body biodistribution and imaging was carried out in COLO 205-bearing animals using in vivo single-photon emission computed tomography imaging and tissue counting. RESULTS: DR5 expression was highest on HCT116, intermediate on SW948 and COLO 205 cells, and lowest on HT-29 cells. COLO 205 cells were the most sensitive to TRA-8-induced cytotoxicity in vitro, SW948 and HCT116 cell lines were moderately sensitive, and HT-29 cells were resistant. Combination treatment with TRA-8 and SN-38 produced additive to synergistic cytotoxicity against all cell lines compared with either single agent. The levels of apoptosis in all cell lines, including HT-29, were increased by combination treatment with SN-38. In vivo, combination therapy with TRA-8 and CPT-11 was superior to either single-agent regimen for three of the xenografts: COLO 205, SW948, and HCT116. COLO 205 tumors were most responsive to therapy with 73% complete regressions after combination therapy. HT-29 cells derived no antitumor efficacy from TRA-8 therapy. Tumor xenografts established from the four colon cancer cell lines had comparable specific localization of (99m)Tc-TRA-8. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro and in vivo effects of TRA-8 anti-DR5 monoclonal antibody on four different colon cancer cell lines and xenografts were quite variable. The HT-29 cell line had low surface DR5 expression and was resistant to TRA-8 both in vitro and in vivo. Three cell lines (COLO 205, SW948, and HCT116) exhibited moderate to high sensitivity to TRA-8-mediated cytotoxicity which was further enhanced by the addition of SN-38, the active metabolite of CPT-11. In vivo, the combination of TRA-8 and CPT-11 treatment produced the highest antitumor efficacy against xenografts established from the three TRA-8-sensitive tumor cell lines. All four colon cancer xenografts had comparable localization of (99m)Tc-TRA-8. These studies support the strategy of TRA-8/CPT-11 combined treatment in human colon cancer clinical trials.     

Influence of P-glycoprotein expression on in vitro cytotoxicity and in vivo antitumour activity of the novel pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer SJG-136

SJG-136 is a novel pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer analogue that acts as a minor-groove interstrand DNA cross-linking agent. The present study investigated the impact of ABCB1 (mdr-1) expression on the activity of SJG-136 using both in vitro and in vivo systems. SJG-136 was highly potent in the colon cancer cell lines HCT-116, HT-29 and SW620 (IC50 0.1-0.3 nM). However, HCT-8 and HCT-15 cells expressing significant levels of mdr-1 were less sensitive (IC50 2.3 and 3.7 nM, respectively) using a SRB assay. The cytotoxicity was increased in HCT-15 and A2780(AD) in presence of 5 microg/ml verapamil. Mdr-1 mRNA expression was determined by qRT-PCR and correlated to SJG-136 IC50s (r2=0.86, P=0.0001). Isogenic 3T3 cells expressing mdr-1 cDNA (3T3 pHamdr-1) were less sensitive to SJG-136 than the parental 3T3 cells (IC50 208 and 6.3 nM, respectively). Finally, SJG-136 (120 microg/kg/d dx5) was highly active against A2780 xenografts (SGD=275) but not A2780(AD) xenografts (SGD=67).     

1,1-Bis(3'-indolyl)-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)methanes induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma-mediated growth inhibition, transactivation, and differentiation markers in colon cancer cells

1,1-Bis(3'indolyl)-1-(p-substitutedphenyl)methanes containing p-trifluoromethyl (DIM-C-pPhCF)), p-t-butyl (DIM-C-pPhtBu), and p-phenyl (DIM-C-pPhC6H5) groups induce peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma)-mediated transactivation in HT-29, HCT-15, RKO, and SW480 colon cancer cell lines. Rosiglitazone also induces transactivation in these cell lines and inhibited growth of HT-29 cells, which express wild-type PPARgamma but not HCT-15 cells, which express mutant (K422Q) PPARgamma. In contrast, DIM-C-pPhCF3, DIM-C-pPhtBu, and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 inhibited growth of both HT-29 and HCT-15 cells with IC50 values ranging from 1 to 10 micromol/L. Rosiglitazone and diindolylmethane (DIM) analogues did not affect expression of cyclin D1, p21, or p27 protein levels or apoptosis in HCT-15 or HT-29 cells but induced keratin 18 in both cell lines. However, rosiglitazone induced caveolins 1 and 2 in HT-29 but not HCT-15 cells, whereas these differentiation markers were induced by DIM-C-pPhCF3 and DIM-C-pPhC6H5 in both cell lines. Because overexpression of caveolin 1 is known to suppress colon cancer cell and tumor growth, the growth inhibitory effects of rosiglitazone and the DIM compounds are associated with PPARgamma-dependent induction of caveolins.     

β-Catenin gene promoter hypermethylation by reactive oxygen species correlates with the migratory and invasive potentials of colon cancer cells

Purpose

Over half of the colon cancer patients suffer from cancer-related events, mainly metastasis. Loss of β-catenin activity has previously been found to facilitate cancer cell dissociation and migration. Here, we aimed to investigate whether epigenetic silencing of β-catenin induces human colon cancer cell migration and/or invasion.

Methods

HCT-116, Caco-2, HT-29 and SW620 cell migration and invasion capacities were assessed using scratch wound healing and Matrigel invasion assays, respectively. Confocal microscopy, qRT-PCR and Western blotting were performed to determine gene expression levels, whereas methylation-specific quantitative real-time PCR was used to assess the extent of β-catenin gene (CTNNB1) promoter methylation after treatment of the cells with TPA, hydrogen peroxide, 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine and/or VAS2870.

Results

We found that treatment of HT-29 and Caco-2 cells (differentiated and low metastatic) with 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate (TPA; a tumor promoter) suppressed E-cadherin and β-catenin expression at both the mRNA and protein levels and, in addition, enhanced cell migration. Furthermore, we found that the CTNNB1 gene promoter methylation levels were higher in the more invasive HCT-116 and SW620 colon cancer cells than in HT-29 and CCD-841 (normal colon epithelial) cells. We also found that TPA or hydrogen peroxide induced CTNNB1 gene promoter methylation to a higher extent in HT-29 and CCD-841 cells than in HCT-116 and SW620 cells, and that the degree of CTNNB1 gene promoter methylation positively correlated with cell dissociation and migration. In addition, we found that co-treatment with 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine, a DNA methyl transferase inhibitor) and VAS2870 (a NADPH oxidase inhibitor) almost completely blocked the invasion of TPA-treated HT-29 and TPA-untreated HCT-116 and SW620 cells, and that these inhibitions surpassed those of the cells treated with decitabine or VAS2870 alone.

Conclusions

From our data we conclude that the extent of CTNNB1 gene promoter methylation by reactive oxygen species correlates with the migratory and invasive abilities of colon cancer cells. Our results suggest that epigenetic regulation of CTNNB1 may serve as a novel avenue to block colon cancer cell migration and invasion.

     

miR-145-5p靶向TAGLN2调控结直肠癌SW620细胞侵袭和迁移的机制探讨

目的:探究微小RNA-145-5p（miR-145-5p）在结直肠癌组织和细胞中的表达情况及其靶向调控肌动蛋白凝胶蛋白2（TAGLN2）对结直肠癌细胞侵袭和迁移能力的影响。方法:采用实时荧光定量PCR（qPCR）技术对48例结直肠癌患者癌组织、配对癌旁组织、结直肠癌细胞株（HCT8、SW620、HCT116、HT-29）及结直肠黏膜细胞FHC中的miR-145-5p和TAGLN2 mRNA表达进行定量分析。将SW620细胞设为空白对照组、miR-145-5p mimics组、mimics-NC组、pcDNA3.1-TAGLN2组、pcDNA3.1-Vector组和miR-145-5p mimics+pcDNA3.1-TAGLN2组,采用qPCR检测miR-145-5p和TAGLN2 mRNA表达,采用Transwell法检测细胞侵袭及迁移能力,采用免疫印迹法（Western blot）检测TAGLN2蛋白及EMT相关蛋白表达,采用双荧光素酶报告实验检测miR-145-5p和TAGLN2间的靶向关系。结果:miR-145-5p在结直肠癌组织中的表达水平显著低于癌旁组织（P<0.05）,并与结直肠癌患者的TNM分期和淋巴结转移相关（均P<0.05）;TAGLN2在结直肠癌组织中的表达水平显著高于癌旁组织,并与miR-145-5p表达呈负相关（P<0.05）;miR-145-5p和TAGLN2在结直肠癌HCT8、SW620、HCT116和HT-29细胞中的表达水平显著低于或高于FHC细胞（均P<0.05）。miR-145-5p过表达可降低SW620细胞的侵袭和迁移能力。miR-145-5p靶向调控TAGLN2表达,单独转染TAGLN2阳性质粒可增加SW620细胞的侵袭和迁移能力,与miR-145-5p mimics同时转染后,TAGLN2蛋白、波形蛋白（Vimentin）和神经钙黏素（N-cadherin）表达降低,上皮钙黏素（E-cadherin）表达升高,TAGLN2对SW620细胞侵袭和迁移能力的增强作用被显著抑制。结论:miR-145-5p在结直肠癌中呈低表达状态,其表达水平与结直肠癌患者的TNM分期和淋巴结转移密切相关,miR-145-5p靶向调控TAGLN2抑制结直肠癌细胞的侵袭和迁移能力。     

Human colon cancer cells surviving high doses of cisplatin or oxaliplatin in vitro are not defective in DNA mismatch repair proteins

PURPOSE: Alterations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins have been associated with an increased resistance of many cancer cell lines to cisplatin. The aim of this work was to investigate whether defects in DNA MMR proteins are involved in the survival of human colorectal cancer cells in the presence of high concentrations of cisplatin and oxaliplatin, a diaminocyclohexane (DACH) platinum compound whose adducts are not recognized by the MMR system. METHODS: Six unselected human colon cancer cell lines (HT29, HCT15, HCT116, Caco2, SW480 and SW620) were treated with a single 3-h exposure to cisplatin or oxaliplatin at suprapharmacological concentrations, ranging from 50 to 200 microg/ml. The microsatellite stability and the expression of MMR proteins in the parental cell lines and in the drug-selected subpopulations were studied. RESULTS: Most cells underwent apoptosis in the days following the cisplatin or oxaliplatin treatment, but some colonies expanded 3 to 4 weeks after, suggesting the presence of innately resistant cells in the six parental cell lines. Microsatellite instability (MIN), which reflects genetic defects in the DNA MMR system, was detected only in the HCT116 parental cell line and its drug-selected counterparts, due to a known mutation in the hMLH1 gene. No acquired MIN was observed in the other cisplatin-selected sublines derived from the HT29, HCT15, Caco2, SW480 or SW620 parental cells. In the same way, Western blot analysis showed that expression of the DNA MMR proteins hMLH1, hPMS1, hPMS2, hMSH2 and hMSH6 did not differ between the parental and the drug-surviving cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that high-level resistance of human colon cancer cells to high doses of cisplatin and oxaliplatin does not seem to be related to acquired defects in the DNA MMR proteins.     

Enhanced antitumor activity of irofulven in combination with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in human colon and ovarian carcinoma cells

Irofulven (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene, MGI-114, NSC 683863) is a semisynthetic derivative of illudin S, a natural product obtained from the Omphalotus mushroom. Irofulven has demonstrated potent activity against a broad range of solid tumors in both cellular and xenograft models and has shown promising activity in clinical trials. To guide the clinical use of irofulven, the present study used the MTT viability assay to examine the cytotoxic effects obtained by combining irofulven with two other anticancer agents: cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The study was carried out with HT-29 and HCT-116 colorectal and A2780 ovarian carcinoma cells as well as with their irofulven- (HT-29/IF2, HCT-116/IF27) or cisplatin-resistant (A2780/CP70) variants. The combinations showed strong sequence specificity. Simultaneous exposure to cisplatin and irofulven was at least additive for four cell lines including the cisplatin-resistant A2780/CP70 ovarian cells which exhibit a multifactorial resistance phenotype. Cisplatin followed by irofulven was additive for parental HCT-116 and A2780 cells whereas irofulven followed by cisplatin was antagonistic in all cellular models. Simultaneous exposure to 5-FU and irofulven was at least additive for all six cell lines. 5-FU followed by irofulven was additive for the parental HT-29 and A2780 cells and synergistic for the irofulven-resistant HCT-116 cell line. Irofulven followed by 5-FU was synergistic for the two ovarian cell lines and additive for the two parental colon cell lines. These studies demonstrate that simultaneous exposure to irofulven and cisplatin is at least additive for most cell lines whereas simultaneous exposure to irofulven and 5-FU is additive to synergistic for all the cell lines tested, including the irofulven- and cisplatin-resistant variants. The enhanced cytotoxicity of irofulven in combination with cisplatin and 5-FU support the clinical application of these regimens.     

Displayed correlation between gene expression profiles and submicroscopic alterations in response to cetuximab, gefitinib and EGF in human colon cancer cell lines

Background

EGFR is frequently overexpressed in colon cancer. We characterized HT-29 and Caco-2, human colon cancer cell lines, untreated and treated with cetuximab or gefitinib alone and in combination with EGF.

Methods

Cell growth was determined using a variation on the MTT assay. Cell-cycle analysis was conducted by flow cytometry. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate EGFR expression and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evidenced the ultrastructural morphology. Gene expression profiling was performed using hybridization of the microarray Ocimum Pan Human 40 K array A.

Results

Caco-2 and HT-29 were respectively 66.25 and 59.24 % in G0/G1. They maintained this level of cell cycle distribution after treatment, suggesting a predominantly differentiated state. Treatment of Caco-2 with EGF or the two EGFR inhibitors produced a significant reduction in their viability. SEM clearly showed morphological cellular transformations in the direction of cellular death in both cell lines treated with EGFR inhibitors. HT-29 and Caco-2 displayed an important reduction of the microvilli (which also lose their erect position in Caco-2), possibly invalidating microvilli absorption function. HT-29 treated with cetuximab lost their boundary contacts and showed filipodi; when treated with gefitinib, they showed some vesicles: generally membrane reshaping is evident. Both cell lines showed a similar behavior in terms of on/off switched genes upon treatment with cetuximab. The gefitinib global gene expression pattern was different for the 2 cell lines; gefitinib treatment induced more changes, but directly correlated with EGF treatment. In cetuximab or gefitinib plus EGF treatments there was possible summation of the morphological effects: cells seemed more weakly affected by the transformation towards apoptosis. The genes appeared to be less stimulated than for single drug cases.

Conclusion

This is the first study to have systematically investigated the effect of cetuximab or gefitinib, alone and in combination with EGF, on human colon cancer cell lines. The EGFR inhibitors have a weaker effect in the presence of EGF that binds EGFR. Cetuximab treatment showed an expression pattern that inversely correlates with EGF treatment. We found interesting cyto-morphological features closely relating to gene expression profile. Both drugs have an effect on differentiation towards cellular death.     

Sequence-dependent growth inhibition and DNA damage formation by the irinotecan-5-fluorouracil combination in human colon carcinoma cell lines

We evaluated irinotecan (CPT-11) together with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for improved cell growth inhibition with respect to that by either agent alone in the human colon carcinoma cell lines SW620, HT-29 and SNU-C4. Cells were exposed for 24 h to each drug, as well as to various combinations and sequences of low, fixed doses of one drug with higher varying doses of the other, cultured for two more days in drug-free medium and then assessed for growth response with the sulphorhodamine B assay. Multiple drug effect analysis was used to evaluate the data, which were then related to the amount of DNA damage occurring in the cells which was determined by a fluorescence-enhancement assay for DNA unwinding. Cellular responses were also related to thymidylate synthase topoisomerase I and carboxyl esterase activities, which were assessed by a ligand-binding and a 3H-release assay; a DNA decatenation assay; and a spectrophotometric method, respectively. IC50 values for 5-FU alone in the SW620, HT29 and SNU-C4 cells were 15.3 +/- 0.8, 8.2 +/- 1.3 and 2.2 +/- 0.7 microM, respectively, and for CPT-11 2.0 +/- 0.9, 2.5 +/- 0.5 and 3.8 +/- 0.3 microM, respectively. The differential responses to 5-FU alone were possibly determined by differences in substrate affinity and conversion rate of thymidylate synthase (K(m) of approximately 7.5, 5.0 and 2.5 microM and V0 of approximately 800, 200 and 2400 microM/h, respectively). The comparable cellular responses to CPT-11 alone might be accounted for by the counterbalancing effects of differences in topoisomerase I (1, 1, and 1.5 arbitrary units, respectively) and carboxyl esterase activities (5055 +/- 1789, 4080 +/- 752, 1713 +/- 522 mU/mg, respectively). IC20 CPT-11 prior to 5-FU was additive to synergistic in SW620, HT-29 and SNU-C4 cells (CIs of 0.7 +/- 0.1). By contrast, pre-treatment with IC20 5-FU antagonised the CPT-11-mediated growth inhibition (CIs of 1.9 +/- 0.4, 1.7 +/- 1.1, 2.5 +/- 0.9, respectively). Simultaneous drug treatment did not produce more cell growth inhibition than either drug alone in the SW620 and the HT-29 cells, but was additive or antagonistic in the SNU-C4 cells (CIs of 1.1 +/- 0.3 and 2.2 +/- 1.4), depending on the ratio of the drugs. Increased DNA damage in the SW620 and HT-29 cells was only seen when IC20 CPT-11 preceded IC50 5-FU, resulting in approximately 40 and 25%, respectively, more lesions than for IC50 5-FU alone. In the SNU-C4 cells, not only such a treatment, but also simultaneous drug treatment produced (30 to 60%) more DNA damage than either drug alone. Our results show clear sequence-dependent antiproliferative effects and DNA damage formation by CPT-11 and 5-FU at combinations of low, fixed doses with higher, varying doses in cultured human colon carcinoma cells, and may be of relevance to the design of improved chemotherapeutic regimens in this disease.     

NO donor and MEK inhibitor synergistically inhibit proliferation and invasion of cancer cells

Nitric oxide (NO) shows tumoricidal activity. We had previously reported that NO downregulates the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt pathway, but upregulates the MEK/ERK pathway downstream of growth factor signaling. We hypothesized that NO donor and MEK inhibitor in combination synergistically inhibit the viability of cancer cells compared to either NO donor or MEK inhibitor alone. We determined the effects of S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO, NO-donor) and U0126 (MEK inhibitor) on insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) signaling, proliferation and invasion in cancer cell lines. GSNO inhibits phosphorylation of IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR), EGF receptor (EGFR) and Akt, but upregulates ERK1/2 phosphorylation in MIAPaCa-2 and HCT-116 cells after stimulation by IGF-I and EGF. On the other hand, U0126 inhibits phosphorylation of ERK1/2, but upregulates phosphorylation of IGF-IR and EGFR in MIAPaCa-2 and HCT-116 cells. The combination of GSNO and U0126 downregulates phosphorylation of IGF-IR, EGFR, Akt and ERK1/2 after stimulation by IGF-I and EGF. GSNO as well as U0126, inhibits the proliferation of MIAPaCa-2, HCT-116, Panc-1, MCF-7, HT-29 and AGS cells in a dose-dependent manner. GSNO and U0126 in combination synergistically inhibit proliferation and invasion of cancer cells. These results indicate that the combined treatment of NO donor and MEK inhibitor may be promising in cancer therapy.     

Diosgenin induces death receptor-5 through activation of p38 pathway and promotes TRAIL-induced apoptosis in colon cancer cells

Previously, we demonstrated that diosgenin induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell lines HCT-116 and HT-29. HT-29 cells have been reported to be one of the most resistant colorectal cancer cell lines to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In this study, we investigated the effect of diosgenin on TRAIL-induced apoptosis in HT-29 cells. We showed that diosgenin sensitizes HT-29 cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Mechanisms underlying this sensitization mainly involved diosgenin-induced p38 MAPK pathway activation and subsequent DR5 overexpression. Furthermore, we showed that diosgenin alone, TRAIL alone or combination treatment increased COX-2 expression and that the use of a COX-2 inhibitor further increased apoptosis induction.     

Diverse sensitivity of cells representing various stages of colon carcinogenesis to increased extracellular zinc: implications for zinc chemoprevention

The relationship between zinc intake and risk of colon cancer is widely recognized. Despite reported mechanisms of zinc-mediated effects in colonic cells no information is available on whether zinc is capable of inducing cell death of malignant colonocytes. The present study shows that increased external zinc concentrations inhibit cell growth of three different colon cancer cell lines representing different stages of colon cancer: HCT-116, HT-29 and SW620 cells and induce their death. Of the tested cell lines, SW620 cells proved to be the most sensitive to externally added zinc and this sensitivity was at least partly due to increased levels of intracellular free zinc and the inability to overexpress metallothionein. Further studies into the mechanisms of zinc-induced cell injury and cell death revealed oxidative stress as the most important underlying mechanism activating stress kinase-dependent signaling, perturbation of mitochondria and plasma membrane damage. In addition, observed cell death in individual cell populations was cell line-dependent and variable including cells displaying features of apoptosis, necrosis, autophagy and other mixed-types. In conclusion, presented results for the first time show variability of responses to zinc in colon cancer at different stages as modeled in vitro and suggest that zinc-induced cell death despite common underlying mechanism(s) might have a variable nature.     

Low dose fractionated radiation enhances the radiosensitization effect of paclitaxel in colorectal tumor cells with mutant p53

BACKGROUND: The current study was undertaken to investigate the influence of wild-type or mutant p53 status on the radiosensitizing effect of paclitaxel in colorectal tumor cell lines. METHODS: HCT-116 (contains wild-type p53) and HT-29 (contains mutant p53) established from moderately differentiated colorectal carcinomas were used in this study. Colony-forming assay was performed after exposure to either different radiation doses (0.5-6 gray [Gy]) or paclitaxel (1-10 nM) or in combination. Induction of p53 and p21(waf1/cip1) by these treatments were determined by immunocytochemistry and Western blot analysis. RESULTS: Radiation caused an increase in nuclear p53 and p21(waf1/cip1) proteins in HCT-116 cells, indicating that p53 functionally induced p21(waf1/cip1). However, induction of nuclear p53 and p21(waf1/cip1) protein was not evident in HT-29 cells, suggesting that p53 was not functional in these cells. Survival data showed that the HCT-116 cells (survival fraction of exponentially growing cells that were irradiated at the clinically relevant dose of 2 Gy [SF(2)] = 0.383; dose required to reduce the fraction of cells to 37% [D(0)] = 223 centigray [cGy]) were significantly sensitive to ionizing radiation (P < 0.008) when compared with the HT-29 cells (SF(2) = 0.614; D(0) = 351 cGy). Paclitaxel caused a higher degree of clonogenic inhibition in HCT-116 (D(0) = 0.7 nM) than HT-29 (D(0) = 1.11 nM) cells (P < 0.06). When paclitaxel and radiation were combined, an enhanced radiosensitizing effect (P < 0.05) was observed in HCT-116 cells (SF(2) = 0.138; D(0) = 103 cGy), whereas in HT-29 cells no significant radiosensitization of paclitaxel was observed (SF(2) = 0.608; D(0) = 306 cGy). However, pretreatment with paclitaxel followed by multifractionated low dose radiation (0.5- or 1-Gy fractions for a total dose of 2 Gy) significantly enhanced the radiosensitizing effect in both HCT-116 and HT-29 cells. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggested that multifractionated radiation given at very low doses after exposure of cells to paclitaxel conferred a potent radiation sensitizing effect irrespective of p53 status.