Evaluation of exposure dose to patients undergoing catheter ablation procedures—a phantom study

The aim of this study was to evaluate entrance skin dose (ESD), organ dose and effective dose to patients undergoing catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias, based on the dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom. ESD values associated with mean fluoroscopy time and digital cine frames were in a range of 0.12–0.30 Gy in right anterior oblique (RAO) and 0.05–0.40 Gy in left anterior oblique (LAO) projection, the values which were less than a threshold dose of 2 Gy for the onset of skin injury. Organs that received high doses in ablation procedures were lung, followed by bone surface, esophagus, liver and red bone marrow. Doses for lung were 24.8–122.7 mGy, and effective doses were 7.9–34.8 mSv for mean fluoroscopy time of 23.4–92.3 min and digital cine frames of 263–511. Conversion coefficients of dose-area product (DAP) to ESD were 8.7 mGy/(Gy·cm²) in RAO and 7.4 mGy/(Gy·cm²) in LAO projection. The coefficients of DAP to the effective dose were 0.37 mSv/(Gy·cm²) in RAO, and 0.41 mSv/(Gy·cm²) in LAO projection. These coefficients enabled us to estimate patient exposure in real time by using monitored values of DAP.     

Reduction of absorbed doses in radiography of the facial skeleton

Radiation absorbed doses from radiography of the paranasal sinuses and the facial skeleton were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) on a phantom head using high-sensitivity screens in an Orbix stand. The entrance doses to the skin of the head ranged from 0.31 to 2.9 mGy per exposure. The absorbed dose from a full series of sinus exposures averaged 0.33 mGy for the oral mucous membrane, 0.33 mGy for the maxillary sinus mucous membrane, 0.11 mGy for the parotid gland, 0.15 mGy for the submandibular gland, 0.61 mGy for the eye lens, and 0.75 mGy for the thyroid gland region. A leaded soft collar adapted to the thyroid region reduced the thyroid doses by more than one order of magnitude, but also reduced the image field. The mean energy imparted from a full series of paranasal sinus projections was 4.8 mJ and from a total series of the facial skeleton, 7.9 mJ.     

Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography

PURPOSE: To measure and compare patient radiation dose from computed tomographic (CT) urography and conventional urography and to compare these doses with dose estimates determined from phantom measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient skin doses were determined by placing a thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) strip (six TLD chips) on the abdomen of eight patients examined with CT urography and 11 patients examined with conventional urography. CT urography group consisted of two women and six men (mean age, 55.5 years), and conventional urography group consisted of six women and five men (mean age, 58.9 years). CT urography protocol included three volumetric acquisitions of the abdomen and pelvis. Conventional urography protocol consisted of acquisition of several images involving full nephrotomography and oblique projections. Mean and SD of measured patient doses were compared with corresponding calculated doses and with dose measured on a Lucite pelvic-torso phantom. Correlation coefficient (R(2)) was calculated to compare measured and calculated skin doses for conventional urography examination, and two-tailed P value significance test was used to evaluate variation in effective dose with patient size. Radiation risk was calculated from effective dose estimates. RESULTS: Mean patient skin doses for CT urography measured with TLD strips and calculated from phantom data (CT dose index) were 56.3 mGy +/- 11.5 and 54.6 mGy +/- 4.1, respectively. Mean patient skin doses for conventional urography measured with TLD strips and calculated as entrance skin dose were 151 mGy +/- 90 and 145 mGy +/- 76, respectively. Correlation coefficient between measured and calculated skin doses for conventional urography examinations was 0.95. Mean effective dose estimates for CT urography and conventional urography were 14.8 mSv +/- 90.0 and 9.7 mSv +/- 3.0, respectively. Mean effective doses estimated for the pelvic-torso phantom were 15.9 mSv (CT urography) and 7.8 mSv (conventional urography). CONCLUSION: Standard protocol for CT urography led to higher mean effective dose, approximately 1.5 times the radiation risk for conventional urography. Patient dose estimates should be taken into consideration when imaging protocols are established for CT urography.     

Radiation doses to paediatric patients up to 5 years of age undergoing micturating cystourethrography examinations and its dependence on patient age: a Monte Carlo study

The effective dose received by children up to 5 years of age from micturating cystourethrography (MCU) examinations was estimated in this study. The MCU examination consisted of 5 radiological views, 2 anteroposterior (AP) and three oblique (OBL) views. Entrance surface doses (ESD) were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters for 30 children. The average ESD values per view varied from 0.34 mGy up to 0.57 mGy. In order to calculate the organ and effective doses, Monte Carlo MCNP-4A radiation transport simulation code was used. It was applied to three mathematical phantoms representing newborn, 1 and 5 year old children and all the patients were classified in those three groups. The effective dose conversion factors (C(f)) were calculated as the ratio of effective dose over the entrance dose. The C(f) factors decrease as the children's age increases. Children simulated by a newborn mathematical phantom, had C(f) factors almost double those represented by a 1-year-old mathematical phantom. For children simulated by a 5 year old phantom, the C(f) factors for AP and OBL views were almost the same. This was true for both male and female patients. The mean effective dose per view for male and female patients was found to be E=0.16 mSv. The effective dose per examination for male patients was E=0.86+/-0.31 mSv and E=0.76+/-0.28 mSv for female patients.     

The doses absorbed by the patients and the exposure of the operators in dental radiodiagnosis]

The present paper reports an updated dosimetry of dental radiology since it presents the data relative to 7 radiological techniques. The doses to 9 organs were measured on a Randoman phantom using TLD (4 in each chosen cavity) for lenses, tongue, cervical vertebrae (C2), thyroid, ovaries, uterus and testes. The examinations were subsequently repeated after applying X-ray shields to the phantom. The main conclusions follow: a) local doses are never negligible but can be really high, especially for tongue (1.880 mGy), thyroid (1.011 mGy), and C2 (0.699 mGy); b) X-ray shields for lenses, ovaries, uterus and testes have proven to be unnecessary; in a more general context, X-ray shields should be evaluated by the Health Physics Dept., especially relative to radiation leaks from the X-ray tube. As for the thyroid, X-ray shields have proven very useful but can result in repeated acquisitions because of possible interference with the radiological image; c) technicians' risk, in the present experimental conditions, does not exceed the threshold values recommended by Italian laws. At any rate, the use of fixed or mobile shieldings should always be evaluated while keeping in mind the specific working conditions in radiology departments.     

Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study

OBJECTIVE: It is necessary to reduce the exposure doses from both fluoroscopy and angiocardiography. Pulsed fluoroscopy clearly reduces patients' exposure. By contrast, whether digital acquisition reduces patients' exposure is not clear. This study simulated the skin radiation doses of patients in cardiac catheterization laboratories with various radiography systems used in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty to determine whether digital acquisition reduces patient exposure as compared with cine film recording. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The entrance surface doses with cineangiography and fluoroscopy of acrylic phantoms were compared for 11 radiography systems at seven facilities; each performs more than 100 cardiac intervention procedures per year. The entrance surface dose for an acrylic plate (20 cm thick) was measured using a skin-dose monitor. RESULTS: The maximum dose exceeded the minimum dose by 6.44 times for cineangiography and by 3.42 times for fluoroscopy. The entrance surface dose with acrylic plate was lower with digital-only acquisition (mean +/- SD, 3.07 +/- 0.84 mGy/sec) than with film recording (6.00 +/- 3.04 mGy/sec). By contrast, the entrance surface frame dose, after correction for the cine frame rate, tended to be higher with digital acquisition than with film recording (0.210 +/- 0.053 vs 0.179 +/- 0.058 mGy/frame, respectively). CONCLUSION. The entrance surface dose was approximately 50% less with digital-only acquisition than with film recording. However, after correcting the dose for cine frame rate, filmless acquisition did not in itself reduce the exposure. For the surface dose to be reduced for cardiac interventional radiography, even with digital filmless radiography systems, a low recording speed is necessary for angiocardiography.     

Radiation exposure to patient and radiologist during transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiation exposure to patients and radiologists during transcatheter arterial embolization(TAE) for hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 39 TAE procedures performed at eight institutes, skin doses were evaluated with thermoluminescence dosimeters at the patient's back(entrance surface) and lower abdomen, and at the radiologist's forehead and abdomen. Real-time dosimeters were also used to evaluate patient skin dose. RESULTS: The patients' mean entrance surface dose was 973 +/- 681 mGy(range, 185 to 3543 mGy) with the mean fluoroscopic time of 21 minutes and 6 digital subtraction angiography(DSA) acquisitions. The dose at the patients' lower abdomen was 0.98 +/- 0.77 mGy. Doses for the radiologists were 0.04 +/- 0.04 mGy at the forehead and 0.15 +/- 0.19 mGy and 0.005 +/- 0.01 mGy at the abdomen over and under the apron, respectively. Fifty-six percent of the patients' skin dose was from DSA and 44% from fluoroscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Patient skin dose may occasionally exceed the dose for transient erythema. Because a patient may have repeated TAEs, skin doses or X-ray conditions should be recorded. The exposed doses of radiologists were considered to be acceptable with proper techniques. Further efforts to reduce radiation should be directed toward both DSA and fluoroscopy.     

脑血管造影术中X射线机房内辐射剂量分布研究

目的 研究脑血管造影术中不同照射方向下X射线机房内辐射剂量场的分布情况.方法 选用脑血管造影术程序,选取后前位、前后位、右前斜30°、左前斜30°、右侧位和左侧位6种照射方式,使用451B型空气电离室巡测仪对以散射模体为中心、半径为3 m范围内的辐射场的剂量率分布进行测量.结果 后前位及右侧位照射时主要操作人员所受到的辐射剂量最低,均为0.4 mGy/h;左侧位照射时主要操作人员受到的辐射剂量最高,为1.54 mGy/h;机架侧区域的辐射剂量水平最低,均小于10 μGy/h.结论 在脑血管造影术中,医护操作人员应尽可能选择剂量较低的后前位及右侧位照射方式投照,并合理选择工作位置,可明显降低受照剂量.

Abstract：

Objective To determine the distribution of irradiation dose in X-ray room with different radiation directions in cerebral angiography operations.Methods The Model 451B air ionization chamber survey meter was used to measure the irradiation dose distribution in the X-ray room when cerebral angiographies were performed at high kV and high dose.The doses were measured within 3 m when the phantom was irradiated in posterior-anterior (PA) position, anterior-posterior(AP) position, right anterior oblique (RAO) 30°, left anterior oblique (LAO) 30°, right-lateral (RL) position, and left-lateral(LL) position, respectively.Results Both the relative data and the distribution curves of the six radiation directions were obtained by using the same interventional operation model.The irradiation dose to the primary operator was minimal in P-A and RL positions,at 0.4 mGy/h, and was maximal in LL position, at up to 1.54 mGy/h.Furthermore, the lowest irradiation dose level was found to be lower than 10 μ Gy/h at the side of the framework field.Conclusions Low-irradiation position and rational work place were proposed to reduce the operators' absorption dose during interventional radiology procedures.     

Estimating the absorbed dose to critical organs during dual X-ray absorptiometry.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to estimate a patient's organ dose (effective dose) during performance of dual X-ray absorptiometry by using the correlations derived from the surface dose and the depth doses in an anthropomorphic phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom was designed and TLDs (Thermoluminescent Dosimeters) were placed at the surface and these were also inserted at different depths of the thyroid and uterus of the anthropomorphic phantom. The absorbed doses were measured on the phantom for the spine and femur scan modes. The correlation coefficients and regression functions between the absorbed surface dose and the depth dose were determined. The derived correlation was then applied for 40 women patients to estimate the depth doses to the thyroid and uterus. RESULTS: There was a correlation between the surface dose and depth dose of the thyroid and uterus in both scan modes. For the women's dosimetry, the average surface doses of the thyroid and uterus were 1.88 microGy and 1.81 microGy, respectively. Also, the scan center dose in the women was 5.70 microGy. There was correlation between the thyroid and uterus surface doses, and the scan center dose. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the effective dose to the patient's critical organs during dual X-ray absorptiometry can be estimated by the correlation derived from phantom dosimetry.     

CT扫描所致受检者器官剂量的体模实验研究

目的 了解不同部位X射线CT扫描所致受检者器官或组织的吸收剂量及其分布。方法 实测体模中重要组织器官的CT值,并转换成线性吸收系数与人体正常值进行比较;在体模中 布放光致辐射发光玻璃剂量计,分别模拟测量头部、胸部、腹部和盆腔CT扫描所致受检者主要器官或组织的吸收剂量。结果 实验用仿真人体模具有良好的组织等效性。头部扫描吸收剂量最大的器官是大脑,胸部扫描吸收剂量较大的器官是甲状腺、乳腺、肺和食道,腹部扫描吸收剂量较大的器官是肝、胃、结肠和肺,单次盆腔扫描体所致骨表面和结肠的吸收剂量可达50 mGy以上。结论 X射线CT扫描所致受检者的器官剂量及其分布随扫描部位的不同而异。盆腔扫描时结肠、红骨髓、性腺和膀胱等主要器官的吸收剂量较大,应引起注意。     

床旁防护装置对冠状动脉造影术者辐射防护效果的体模研究

目的 测量冠状动脉造影8个投照体位在有与无床旁防护装置防护下术者所受辐射剂量,为冠心病介入治疗中减少术者辐射暴露提供参考。方法 在第一及第二术者站位,距地面20至180 cm处,每隔20 cm放置一个实时剂量测量仪。采用冠状动脉造影8个体位投照,测量在有与无床旁防护装置防护下,术者在不同投照体位的不同高度接受辐射剂量情况。结果 在第一术者位,除1.2 m高度仍可测到较高剂量(剂量率0.35~4.78 mSv/h,屏蔽率27.67%~89.33%),其余各点屏蔽率均在91%以上。左前斜尾位、左前斜位、左前斜头位辐射剂量较高。第二术者位屏蔽率较第一术者位低,剂量峰值可出现在0.8、1.0及1.4 m高度(剂量率0.27~1.86 mSv/h,屏蔽率30.34%~92.13%)。右前斜尾位、左前斜尾位、正头位、左前斜位辐射剂量较高。结论 床旁防护装置防护下,术者在左前斜尾位、左前斜位、左前斜头位、右前斜尾位的辐射暴露较高,应尽量少采用上述投照体位长时间曝光。同时应加强0.8~1.4 m高度的辐射防护。     

Importance of Dose Settings in the X-Ray Systems Used for Interventional Radiology: A National Survey

The purpose of this work was to investigate the differences in dose settings among the X-ray units involved in a national survey of patient doses in interventional radiology (IR). The survey was promoted by the National Society of IR and involved 10 centers. As part of the agreed quality control for the survey, entrance doses were measured in a 20-cm-thick acrylic phantom simulating a medium-sized patient. A standard digital subtraction angiography (DSA) imaging protocol for the abdomen was used at the different centers. The center of the phantom was placed at the isocenter of the C-arm system during the measurements to simulate clinical conditions. Units with image intensifiers and flat detectors were involved in the survey. Entrance doses for low, medium, and high fluoroscopy modes and DSA acquisitions were measured for a field of view of 20 cm (or closest). A widespread range of entrance dose values was obtained: 4.5–18.6, 9.2–28.4, and 15.4–51.5 mGy/min in low, medium, and high fluoroscopy mode, respectively, and 0.7–5.0 mGy/DSA image. The ratios between the maximum and the minimum values measured (3–4 for fluoroscopy and 7 for DSA) suggest an important margin for optimization. The calibration factor for the dose-area product meter was also included in the survey and resulted in a mean value of 0.73, with a standard deviation of 0.07. It seems clear that the dose setting for the X-ray systems used in IR requires better criteria and approaches. This paper was presented as a scientific poster at the CIRSE annual meeting in Copenhagen, September 2008.     

Entrance skin dose estimates derived from dose-area product measurements in interventional radiological procedures.

Patient skin doses resulting from interventional radiological procedures have the potential to exceed threshold doses for deterministic effects such as erythema and epilation. If the irradiation geometry is known, the entrance skin dose can be estimated from the measured dose-area product. For each of 10 non-coronary interventional procedures, a nominal geometry was identified. From a previous survey of patient dose-area products, the entrance skin doses were estimated under the assumption that all procedures were performed with the nominal geometry specific to it. An analysis of the uncertainties in these doses caused by realistic deviations from the nominal geometry was also performed and it was shown that the estimated entrance skin dose values are at least to within 40%, and generally to within about 30%, of those actually received. For example, the median estimated entrance skin doses for the posteroanterior and lateral projections of cerebral angiography were 100 and 110 mGy. respectively, and for hepatic angiography 425 mGy. The largest entrance skin dose estimate for a single projection was for the angiography component of a CT arterial portography procedure at 670 mGy. Comparisons between entrance skin dose estimates obtained from this study are made with data from other interventional radiology patient dose surveys.     

Bone marrow dose in chest radiography: the posteroanterior vs. anteroposterior projection.

The dose to active bone marrow resulting from anteroposterior (AP) and posteroanterior (PA) chest examinations was estimated using an Alderson Rando phantom and extruded lithium fluoride dosimeters. The AP projections resulted in a mean marrow dose range of 1.9-2.6 mrad (0.019-0.026 mGy) as compared to doses for PA projections of 3.4-3.8 mrad (0.034-0.038 mGy) for optimally diagnostic exposure taken at 70, 90, and 120 kVp.     

Reduction of radiation dose for cerebral angiography using flat panel detector of direct conversion type: a vascular phantom study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Compared with image intensifier television (I.I.-TV) system, an angiography system using the flat panel detector (FPD) of direct conversion type has a high spatial resolution, which may improve image quality, reduce patient exposure, or both. Our purpose was to evaluate the detection of simulated aneurysmal blebs under dose reduction with the FPD system in comparison with the I.I.-TV system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A vascular phantom was designed to simulate various intracranial aneurysms with and without blebs, and this phantom was filled with 3 different concentrations of contrast material (300, 150, and 100 mg I/mL). 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA) at low-dose mode of FPD system was compared with 2D DSA at a standard-dose mode of FPD system and a conventional mode of I.I.-TV system. Data analysis was based on 171 observations (57 aneurysms [20 with bleb and 37 without bleb] x 3 contrast material concentrations) by each of 7 radiologists, and the detection performances of blebs were compared using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The mean dose measurements with a phantom during 2D DSA were 0.36 mGy/frame with low-dose mode of FPD system, 0.72 mGy/frame with standard-dose mode of FPD system and 0.76 mGy/frame with I.I.-TV system. The mean Az at 100 mg I/mL was significantly higher for low-dose mode of FPD than for conventional-dose mode of I.I.-TV mean Az, 0.85 versus 0.56; P < .01), though differences were not significant with 150 and 300 mg I/mL between both systems. CONCLUSION: The FPD system allows a considerable dose reduction during 2D DSA without loss of the image quality.     

Estimation of the beta+ dose to the embryo resulting from 18F-FDG administration during early pregnancy.

Although 18F-FDG examinations are widely used, data are lacking on the dose to human embryo tissues in cases of exposure in early pregnancy. Although the photon component can easily be estimated from available data on the pharmacokinetics of 18F-FDG in female organs and from phantom measurements (considering the uterus as the target organ), the intensity of embryo tissue uptake, which is essential for deriving the beta+ dose, is not known. We report the case of a patient who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for tumor surveillance and who was later found to have been pregnant at the time of the examination (embryo age, 8 wk). METHODS: The patient received 320 MBq of (18)F-FDG. Imaging started with an unenhanced CT scan 1 h after the injection, followed by PET acquisition. PET images were used to compute the total number of beta+ emissions in embryo tissues per unit of injected activity, from standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements corrected for partial-volume effects. A Monte Carlo track structure code was then used to derive the beta+ self-dose and the beta+ cross-dose from amniotic fluid. The photon and CT doses were added to obtain the final dose received by the embryo. RESULTS: The mean SUV in embryo tissues was 2.7, after correction for the partial-volume effect. The mean corrected SUV of amniotic fluid was 1.1. Monte Carlo simulation showed that the beta+ dose to the embryo (self-dose plus cross-dose from amniotic fluid) was 1.8E-2 mGy per MBq of injected 18F-FDG. Based on MIRD data for the photon dose to the uterus, the estimated photon dose to the embryo was 1.5E-2 mGy/MBq. Thus, the specific 18F-FDG dose to the embryo was 3.3E-2 mGy/MBq (10.6 mGy in this patient). The CT scan added a further 8.3 mGy. CONCLUSION: The dose to the embryo is 3.3E-2 mGy/MBq of 18F-FDG. The beta+ dose contributes 55% of the total dose. This value is higher than previous estimates in late nonhuman-primate pregnancies.     

Radiation dose to the lens of eye and thyroid gland in paranasal sinus multislice CT

CT has become an established examination in the evaluation of the paranasal sinuses. Until recently this was achieved by the direct coronal technique on conventional and single slice helical scanners. With the advent of multislice technology, thin slice axial CT with excellent coronal and sagittal reconstructions is now the norm. We describe a study designed to evaluate the radiation dose to the lens of the eye and thyroid gland in the axial and coronal planes on a Siemens Volume Zoom quad slice scanner at 140 kV and effective mAs of 100 using 1 mm collimation. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed on the eyelid and thyroid gland of 29 patients scanned axially in the supine position and a further 28 patients scanned coronally in the prone position with gantry tilt. The results show mean doses of 35.1 mGy (lens) and 2.9 mGy (thyroid gland) in the coronal plane compared with 24.5 mGy (lens) and 1.4 mGy (thyroid gland) in the axial plane. Results obtained from a head phantom and from using the ImPACT CT dose calculator were comparable. The kV and mAs were then reduced to 120 and 40, respectively, and the axial study repeated using the head phantom and predicted doses using the ImPACT CT dose calculator. The low dose scanning technique revealed a lens dose of 9.2 mGy and thyroid dose of 0.4 mGy. The eye dose on a multislice scanner is still substantially less than the threshold dose of 0.5-2 Gy for detectable lens opacities. These results indicate that, in addition to the established perceived advantages of multislice axial sinus CT, i.e. patient comfort, no artefact from dental amalgam and reproducible true coronal images, should be included a decreased radiation dose to both the eye lens and thyroid gland compared with direct coronal scanning.     

X射线摄影所致受检者器官剂量-入射体表剂量转换系数的研究

目的 比较简单程式化数学模型(MIRD)与体素模型在常见X射线摄影下得到的器官剂量-入射体表剂量的转换系数差异。方法 利用蒙特卡罗模拟技术,分别模拟计算体素模型的5种常见摄影下受检者的器官剂量与入射体表剂量,并计算两者的转换系数,与MIRD模型所得结果进行比较。结果 体素模型得到射野内器官的转换系数分别是,胸部后前位0.149~0.650,胸部左侧位0.067~0.382,胸部右侧位0.023~0.374,腹部前后位0.035~0.431,腰椎前后位0.083~0.432。在胸部后前位下,两种模型模拟肺的剂量转换系数结果相差最大约54.3%;胸部左侧位照射的肝脏剂量转换系数差异最大为54.5%;胸部右侧位照射胃剂量转换系数差异最大为63.8%;而腹部前后位,两种模型模拟脾脏的剂量转换系数差异最大为65.0%;腰椎前后位发现胃的剂量转换系数相差最大约43.7%。结论 利用两种模型模拟得到的器官剂量转换系数偏差可达50%以上,由于MIRD模型的解剖结构过于简化,计算误差较大。利用体素模型得到的转换系数数据更加科学合理。     

Patient and staff exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Despite a number of efforts being put into the radiological protection of both patient and staff during interventional radiological (IR) procedures during recent years, information about radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures remains scarce. The purpose of this study was to estimate both patient and staff radiation doses during therapeutic ERCP procedures by direct measurement and to compare these results with data from other IR procedures. For 54 patients, effective dose and skin dose were estimated by measuring the dose-area product. For staff, entrance surface doses to the lens of the eye, thyroid and hands were estimated by thermoluminescent dosemeters. A median effective dose of 7.3 mSv and a median entrance surface dose of 271 mGy per procedure were estimated for patients. The gastroenterologist received a median dose of 0.34 mGy to the lens of the eye, 0.30 mGy to the skin at the level of the thyroid and 0.44 mGy to the skin of the hands, per procedure. When comparing the dosimetric quantities presented in this study with data from other IR procedures, it is clear that patient skin doses and doses to staff are high owing to the use of inappropriate X-ray equipment. ERCP requires the same radiation protection practice as all IR procedures. It should be consistently included in future multicentre IR patient and staff dose survey studies at national or international level.     

"Anode heel effect" on patient dose in lumbar spine radiography

Appropriate use of the "anode heel effect" of the output beam from an X-ray tube can reduce the effective dose to patients in some common radiological examinations. We investigated the variation in radiation intensity across the X-ray beam caused by the anode heel effect, and quantified the difference in absorbed dose to critical organs resulting from lumbar spine X-ray projections carried out with the two possible orientations of the patient along the tube axis (cathode to anode). A Rando phantom and some high sensitivity thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) (LiF:Mg,Cu,P) were used. With the tube axis horizontal, radiation intensity profiles, parallel and perpendicular to the axis, were measured. Lumbar spine radiographs were recorded using the Rando phantom in the standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral projections. TLD pellets were used to measure the absorbed radiation dose at various sites corresponding to critical organ tissues (ovaries, testes, breasts, thyroid and lens). Each set of projections was recorded in two phantom orientations, first with the phantom head placed towards the cathode end of the X-ray tube, and then in the reverse direction. From the radiation intensity profile of the incident X-ray beam, the "cathode end" to "anode end" air dose ratio was found to be 1.8. In lumbar spine radiography, with the phantom head placed towards the anode end of the X-ray tube, the ovaries and testes received an average dose 17% and 12% higher, respectively, in the lateral projection, and 16% and 27% higher, respectively, in the AP projection, than those obtained in the reverse "patient" orientation. These results indicate that patients (particularly females) should always be positioned with the head placed towards the cathode end of the X-ray tube for lumbar spine radiography to achieve significant dose reductions.