Muscle forces and pronation stabilize the lateral ligament deficient elbow.

The influence of muscle activity and forearm position on the stability of the lateral collateral ligament deficient elbow was investigated in vitro, using a custom testing apparatus to simulate active and passive elbow flexion. Rotation of the ulna relative to the humerus was measured before and after sectioning of the joint capsule, and the radial and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments from the lateral epicondyle. Gross instability was present after lateral collateral ligament transection during passive elbow flexion with the arm in the varus orientation. In the vertical orientation during passive elbow flexion, stability of the lateral collateral ligament deficient elbow was similar to the intact elbow with the forearm held in pronation, but not similar to the intact elbow when maintained in supination. This instability with the forearm supinated was reduced significantly when simulated active flexion was done. The stabilizing effect of muscle activity suggests physical therapy of the lateral collateral ligament deficient elbow should focus on active rather than passive mobilization, while avoiding shoulder abduction to minimize varus elbow stress. Passive mobilization should be done with the forearm maintained in pronation.     

Effects of elbow flexion and forearm rotation on valgus laxity of the elbow

BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation of valgus elbow laxity is difficult. The optimum position of elbow flexion and forearm rotation with which to identify valgus laxity in a patient with an injury of the ulnar collateral ligament of the elbow has not been determined. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of forearm rotation and elbow flexion on valgus elbow laxity. METHODS: Twelve intact cadaveric upper extremities were studied with a custom elbow-testing device. Laxity was measured with the forearm in pronation, supination, and neutral rotation at 30 degrees, 50 degrees, and 70 degrees of elbow flexion with use of 2 Nm of valgus torque. Testing was conducted with the ulnar collateral ligament intact, with the joint vented, after cutting of the anterior half (six specimens) or posterior half (six specimens) of the anterior oblique ligament of the ulnar collateral ligament, and after complete sectioning of the anterior oblique ligament. Laxity was measured in degrees of valgus angulation in different positions of elbow flexion and forearm rotation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in valgus laxity with respect to elbow flexion within each condition. Overall, for both groups of specimens (i.e., specimens in which the anterior or posterior half of the anterior oblique ligament was cut), neutral forearm rotation resulted in greater valgus laxity than pronation or supination did (p < 0.05). Transection of the anterior half of the anterior oblique ligament did not significantly increase valgus laxity; however, transection of the posterior half resulted in increased valgus laxity in some positions. Full transection of the anterior oblique ligament significantly increased valgus laxity in all positions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this in vitro cadaveric study demonstrated that forearm rotation had a significant effect on varus-valgus laxity. Laxity was always greatest in neutral forearm rotation throughout the ranges of elbow flexion and the various surgical conditions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The information obtained from the present study suggests that forearm rotation affects varus-valgus elbow laxity. Additional investigation is warranted to determine if forearm rotation should be considered in the evaluation and treatment of ulnar collateral ligament injuries of the elbow joint.     

Ligamentous stabilizers against posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: The lateral ulnar collateral ligament, the entire lateral collateral ligament complex, and the overlying extensor muscles have all been suggested as key stabilizers against posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether either an intact radial collateral ligament alone or an intact lateral ulnar collateral ligament alone is sufficient to prevent posterolateral rotatory instability when the annular ligament is intact. METHODS: Sequential sectioning of the radial collateral and lateral ulnar collateral ligaments was performed in twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities. At each stage of the sectioning protocol, a pivot shift test was performed with the arm in a vertical position. Passive elbow flexion was performed with the forearm maintained in either pronation or supination and the arm in the varus and valgus gravity-loaded orientations. An electromagnetic tracking device was used to quantify the internal-external rotation and varus-valgus angulation of the ulna with respect to the humerus. RESULTS: Compared with the intact elbow, no differences in the magnitude of internal-external rotation or maximum varus-valgus laxity of the ulna were detected with only the radial collateral or lateral ulnar collateral ligament intact (p > 0.05). However, once the entire lateral collateral ligament was transected, significant increases in internal-external rotation (p = 0.0007) and maximum varus-valgus laxity (p < 0.0001) were measured. None of the pivot shift tests had a clinically positive result until the entire lateral collateral ligament was sectioned. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that, when the annular ligament is intact, either the radial collateral ligament or the lateral ulnar collateral ligament can be transected without inducing posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow.     

Single-strand ligament reconstruction of the medial collateral ligament restores valgus elbow stability

The purpose of this study was to determine the contribution of the central portion of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) to elbow stability and to evaluate the effectiveness of a single-strand MCL reconstruction in restoring elbow stability. Testing of 11 fresh-frozen upper extremities was first performed on the intact elbow and then with the capsule, flexor-pronator muscle group, posterior bundle, anterior or posterior band, and central band cut sequentially. Next, a single-strand reconstruction of the MCL was performed. The elbow was moved passively through a full arc of flexion in both varus and valgus gravity-loaded positions. Ulnar movement with respect to the humerus was analyzed by means of an electromagnetic tracking system. Maximum varus-valgus laxity throughout the arc of supinated flexion and pronated flexion was 6.6 degree plus minus 2.4 degree and 7.4 degree plus minus 2.0 degree, respectively, for the intact specimen, 34.2 degree plus minus 5.6 degree and 37.7 degree plus minus 11.8 degree for the specimen with all of the medial valgus elbow stabilizers cut, and 9.0 degree plus minus 2.5 degree and 10.5 degree plus minus 2.7 degree for the reconstructed specimen. Maximum varus-valgus laxity was not significantly different among any of the sectioning sequences until the central band was cut (P <.0001). There was no significant difference in maximum varus-valgus laxity between the intact and reconstructed elbows (P <.05). Our results demonstrate that the central band is an important valgus stabilizer of the elbow and that a simplified single-strand reconstruction is able to restore stability to the MCL-deficient elbow.     

The effect of radial head fracture size on elbow kinematics and stability.

This study determined the effect of radial head fracture size and ligament injury on elbow kinematics. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were studied in an in vitro elbow simulator. Testing was performed with ligaments intact, with the medial collateral (MCL) or lateral collateral (LCL) ligament detached, and with both the MCL and LCL detached. Thirty degree wedges were sequentially removed from the anterolateral radial head up to 120 degrees . Valgus angulation and external rotation of the ulna relative to the humerus were determined for passive motion, active motion, and pivot shift testing with the arm in a vertical (dependent) orientation. Maximum varus-valgus laxity was calculated from measurements of varus and valgus angulation with the arm in horizontal gravity-loaded positions. No effect of increasing radial head fracture size was observed on valgus angulation during passive and active motion in the dependent position. In supination, external rotation increased with increasing fracture size during passive motion with LCL deficiency and both MCL and LCL deficiency. With intact ligaments, maximum varus-valgus laxity increased with increasing radial head fracture size. With ligament disruption, elbows were grossly unstable, and no effect of increasing radial head fracture size occurred. During pivot shift testing, performed with the ligaments intact, subtle instability was noted after resection of one-third of the radial head. In this in vitro biomechanical study, small subtle effects of radial head fracture size on elbow kinematics and stability were seen in both the ligament intact and ligament deficient elbows. These data suggest that fixation of displaced radial head fractures less than or equal to one-third of the articular diameter may have some biomechanical advantages; however, clinical correlation is required.     

Overhead arm positioning in the rehabilitation of elbow dislocations: An in vitro biomechanical study

Study DesignIn vitro biomechanical study.IntroductionElbow stiffness is a common complication following elbow dislocation. Overhead exercises have been proposed to initiate early motion to reduce stiffness through employing gravity to stabilize the elbow. The implications of this position with regard to elbow kinematics after dislocation have not been reported.Purpose of the StudyTo determine the influence of the overhead position on elbow stability following combined medial and lateral collateral ligament (MCL and LCL) injuries.MethodsPassive and simulated active extension were performed on 11 cadaveric elbows with the arm in the overhead, dependent, and horizontal positions and with the forearm in pronation, neutral, and supination. Internal-external rotation (IER) and varus-valgus angulation (VVA) of the ulnohumeral joint were assessed for the intact elbow and after simulated MCL-LCL injury. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted to analyze the effects of elbow state, arm position, forearm rotation, and extension angle.ResultsDuring passive extension with the arm overhead, the pronated position resulted in more internal rotation than supination (-2.6 ± 0.7°, P = .03). There was no effect of forearm rotation on VVA. The overhead position increased internal rotation relative to the dependent position when the forearm was neutral (-8.5 ± 2.5°, P = .04) and relative to the horizontal position when the forearm was supinated (-12.7 ± 2.2°, P= .02). During active extension, pronation increased valgus angle compared to the neutral (+1.2 ± 0.3°, P= .04) and supinated (+1.5 ± 0.4°, P= .03) positions, but did not affect IER. There was no difference between active and passive motion with the arm overhead (P > .05).DiscussionMovement of the injured elbow in the overhead position most closely replicated kinematics of the intact elbow compared to the other arm positions.ConclusionsOverhead elbow extension results in similar kinematics between an intact elbow and an elbow with MCL and LCL tears. As such, therapists might consider early motion in this position to reduce the risk of elbow stiffness after dislocation.     

Metallic radial head arthroplasty improves valgus stability of the elbow

The stabilizing influence of radial head arthroplasty was studied in eight medial collateral ligament deficient anatomic specimen elbows. An elbow testing apparatus, which used computer controlled pneumatic actuators to apply tendon loading, was used to simulate active elbow flexion. The motion pathways of the elbow were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device, with the forearm in supination and pronation. As a measure of stability, the maximum varus to valgus laxity over the range of elbow flexion was determined from the difference between varus and valgus gravity loaded motion pathways. After transection of the medial collateral ligament, the radial head was excised and replaced with either a silicone or one of three metallic radial head prostheses. Medial collateral ligament transection caused a significant increase in the maximum varus to valgus laxity to 18.0 degrees +/- 3.2 degrees. After radial head excision, this laxity increased to 35.6 degrees +/- 10.3 degrees. The silicone implant conferred no increase in elbow stability, with a maximum varus to valgus laxity of 32.5 degrees +/- 15.5 degrees. All three metallic implants improved the valgus stability of the medial collateral ligament deficient elbow, providing stability similar to the intact radial head. The use of silicone arthroplasty to replace the radial head in the medial collateral ligament deficient elbow must be questioned. Metallic radial head arthroplasty provides improved valgus stability, approaching that of an intact radial head.     

Variability and repeatability of the flexion axis at the ulnohumeral joint.

Previous investigations have implemented screw displacement axes (SDAs) to define the elbow flexion axis for proper positioning of dynamic external fixators and endoprostheses. However, results across studies vary, which may be attributed to forearm position (pronation-supination) during elbow motion, or the mode of loading (active/passive) employed to generate flexion. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the influence of the flexion mode employed and forearm position on individual variation and repeatability of SDAs throughout elbow flexion. With the forearm pronated, the location of the average SDA was similar whether elbow flexion was generated actively or passively. In contrast, with the forearm supinated, the average SDA was 2.4 degrees and 1.4 degrees more valgus (p<0.001) and internally rotated (p<0.001), respectively, and positioned 1.6 and 0.8 mm further proximally (p=0.002) and anteriorly (p=0.005) relative to the capitellum, respectively, during active compared to passive flexion. During active flexion, the location of the average SDA was independent of forearm position. Conversely, during passive flexion, the average SDA angle was 3.4 degrees and 1.0 degrees more valgus (p<0.001) and internally rotated (p=0.009), respectively, and 1.7 and 0.7 mm more proximal (p<0.001) and anterior (p=0.001) relative to the capitellum, respectively, with the forearm held pronated rather than supinated. SDAs calculated throughout flexion deviated from the average SDA in both orientation and position, demonstrating that elbow flexion behaves similar to a loose hinge joint. These factors suggest that to encompass the location of all SDAs throughout flexion, and therefore properly mimic normal elbow joint motion, an endoprosthesis should be modeled similar to a "loose" rather than "pure" hinge joint. This would allow for dependencies of SDA angulation on forearm position and muscle activation, and slight freedom of movement to account for variances in SDA location. These factors should also be considered during soft-tissue reconstructions.     

Elbow joint stability in relation to forced external rotation: An experimental study of the osseous constraint

The objective of this study was to evaluate the osseous constraint related to forced forearm external rotation as the initial stage in a posterior elbow dislocation. Six joint specimens without soft tissues were examined in a joint analysis system developed for simulation of dislocation. The osseous stability, expressed as the maximal torque needed for pathologic external forearm rotation, increased from varus to valgus stress (P =.0001) and from 10 degrees to 90 degrees of elbow flexion (P =.012) and also tended to increase from forearm supination to pronation. The work of pathologic external forearm rotation until the point of maximal torque decreased from a maximum in full extension to a minimum at 30 degrees of elbow flexion (P =.03). The elbow in a slightly flexed position, varus stress, and forearm external rotation trauma might be the important biomechanical factors in the posterior elbow dislocation, and they might serve as guidelines during clinical investigation for posterolateral instability.     

The effect of medial collateral ligament repair tension on elbow joint kinematics and stability

PURPOSE: Medial collateral ligament (MCL) repair is commonly performed for the management of acute or subacute instability after elbow dislocations and fracture-dislocations. The effectiveness of transosseous repair of the MCL, as is typically performed clinically, in restoring the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow is of interest as is the effect of MCL tensioning on the initial stability of the elbow. The purpose of this study was to determine whether suture repair of the MCL is able to restore the normal kinematics and stability of the elbow and to determine the optimal initial MCL repair tension. METHODS: Six cadaveric upper extremities were mounted in an upper limb joint simulator. Simulated active and passive elbow flexion was generated while the kinematics were measured with the arm in the dependent and the valgus gravity-loaded orientations. After testing the intact elbow, the MCL was released at its humeral attachment and repaired using a transosseous suture technique at three different repair tensions: 20, 40, and 60 N. RESULTS: Medial collateral ligament repair using a transosseous suture technique restored the kinematics and stability of the MCL-deficient elbow. Motion pathways were affected by the magnitude of initial MCL tension. For all arm orientations and forearm positions, the 20-N and 40-N repairs were not statistically different from each other or from the intact MCL. The 60-N repairs, however, were often statistically different than the other groups, suggesting an overtightening that tended to pull the ulna into a varus position-especially in the midrange of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that MCL repair using transosseous sutures provide adequate joint stability to permit early motion. There is a broad range of acceptable tensions for MCL repair, which is a favorable, clinically relevant finding. Clinical studies are needed to validate these in vitro results.     

A mechanical study of the moment-forces of the supinators and pronators of the forearm

We determined the torque generated by the muscles rotating the forearm at varying degrees of pronation and supination. We used 8 human cadaveric upper extremity specimens with the humerus and ulna rigidly fixed with the elbow in 90 degrees of flexion, while free rotation of the radius around the ulna was allowed. The tendons of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), supinator, biceps, pronator teres (PT), and the pronator quadratus' (PQ) superficial and deep heads were isolated. After locking the forearm at intervals of 10 degrees from 90 degrees of pronation to 90 degrees of supination, we loaded each muscle/tendon with a ramp profile. We found that the biceps and supinator are both active supinators, the biceps generating four times more torque with the forearm in a pronated position. As for pronation, the PT and both heads of the PQ are active throughout the whole rotation, being most efficient around the neutral position of the forearm. The ECU and FCU contribute significantly less to pronation and supination torque. However, they do generate potential pronating torque while the forearm is positioned maximally in supination and, to a lesser extent, potential supination torque while the forearm is positioned maximally in pronation.     

The effect of elbow position on the range of supination and pronation of the forearm

A kinematic study was performed to examine the influence of elbow position on the range of supination and pronation of the forearm. The ranges of supination and pronation were measured in 50 volunteers (25 men and 25 women) using a custom-designed jig which constrained unwanted and confounding movements of the limb. Measurements were taken with the elbow in full extension, 45 degrees flexion, 90 degrees flexion and full flexion. The data showed a reciprocal relationship between the range of supination and the range of pronation of the forearm which depended on the degree of elbow flexion. As the elbow is flexed, the maximum angle of supination increases while the maximum angle of pronation decreases (p<0.001). The converse is true as the elbow is extended (p<0.001).     

Elbow subluxation and dislocation. A spectrum of instability.

After sequential releases of the ligaments and capsules of 13 fresh autopsy specimen elbows, external rotation and valgus moments with axial forces resulted in posterior dislocations in 12 of the 13 with the anterior medical collateral ligament (AMCL) intact. Kinematic displacements measured with a three-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device showed that dislocation involved posterolateral rotation of 34 degrees-50 degrees and 5 degrees-23 degrees valgus at about 80 degrees flexion. Dislocation is the final of three sequential stages of elbow instability resulting from posterolateral rotation, with soft-tissue disruption progressing from lateral to medial. In each stage, the pathoanatomy correlated with the pattern and degree of instability. Testing for valgus stability of the elbow during simulated active flexion revealed no significant increase (-0.3 degrees-2.4 degrees) in valgus laxity after reduction compared with the intact specimens (p greater than 0.05, beta = 0.1, delta = 2.5 degrees). In no case did the digitized AMCL origin-to-insertion distance increase beyond normal during the dislocation (p less than 0.01). The mechanism of dislocation during a fall on the outstretched hand would involve the body "rotating internally" on the elbow, which experiences an external rotation/valgus moment as it flexes. Posterior dislocations should therefore be reduced in supination. If valgus stability in pronation is demonstrated, the AMCL can be assumed to be intact, and rehabilitation in a hinged cast-brace with the elbow in full pronation can be commenced immediately.     

A mechanical study of the moment-forces of the supinators and pronators of the forearm

We determined the torque generated by the muscles rotating the forearm at varying degrees of pronation and supination. We used 8 human cadaveric upper extremity specimens with the humerus and ulna rigidly fixed with the elbow in 90° of flexion, while free rotation of the radius around the ulna was allowed. The tendons of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), supinator, biceps, pronator teres (PT), and the pronator quadratus' (PQ) superficial and deep heads were isolated. After locking the forearm at intervals of 10° from 90° of pronation to 90° of supination, we loaded each muscle/tendon with a ramp profile.

We found that the biceps and supinator are both active supinators, the biceps generating four times more torque with the forearm in a pronated position. As for pronation, the PT and both heads of the PQ are active throughout the whole rotation, being most efficient around the neutral position of the forearm. The ECU and FCU contribute significantly less to pronation and supination torque. However,they do generate potential pronating torque while the forearm is positioned maximally in supination and, to a lesser extent, potential supination torque while the forearm is positioned maximally in pronation.     

A mechanical study of the moment-forces of the supinators and pronators of the forearm

We determined the torque generated by the muscles rotating the forearm at varying degrees of pronation and supination. We used 8 human cadaveric upper extremity specimens with the humerus and ulna rigidly fixed with the elbow in 90° of flexion, while free rotation of the radius around the ulna was allowed. The tendons of the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), supinator, biceps, pronator teres (PT), and the pronator quadratus' (PQ) superficial and deep heads were isolated. After locking the forearm at intervals of 10° from 90° of pronation to 90° of supination, we loaded each muscle/tendon with a ramp profile. We found that the biceps and supinator are both active supinators, the biceps generating four times more torque with the forearm in a pronated position. As for pronation, the PT and both heads of the PQ are active throughout the whole rotation, being most efficient around the neutral position of the forearm. The ECU and FCU contribute significantly less to pronation and supination torque. However,they do generate potential pronating torque while the forearm is positioned maximally in supination and, to a lesser extent, potential supination torque while the forearm is positioned maximally in pronation.     

The excursion of the median nerve during nerve gliding exercise: an observation with high-resolution ultrasonography

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between the positioning of upper extremity and gliding distance of the median nerve during passive and active motion of the wrist and fingers. The longitudinal gliding of the medial nerve in the forearm was measured in 34 healthy subjects by ultrasonographic dynamic images. Those images were analyzed in a cross-correlation algorithm advocated by Dilley et al. (2001). In this experiment, passive extension of the wrist and fingers was applied manually by an examiner in four positions (elbow flexion and extension with forearm pronation, and elbow flexion and extension with forearm supination), two types of active finger motions (Hook and Grasp) were performed by the subjects. The distally oriented median nerve gliding ranged from 1.9 (in elbow extension with forearm pronation) to 3.0mm (in elbow flexion with forearm supination) during passive extension of the wrist and fingers. There was a statistically significant difference in nerve gliding between the positions (p=0.001). During active digital movement, the proximally oriented nerve gliding was observed from 0.8 (in the hook) to 1.3mm (in the grasp). There was a significant difference in nerve gliding between the two ways of active finger motions (p=0.001). On the basis of the data obtained from this study, it is concluded that forearm supination is the preferred position for the passive median nerve gliding exercise because of large distally oriented nerve gliding. The active digital motion with full finger grip may be an effective procedure to produce proximally oriented median nerve gliding.     

Contribution of monoblock and bipolar radial head prostheses to valgus stability of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stabilizing effect of radial head replacement in cadaver elbows with a deficient medial collateral ligament. METHODS: Passive elbow flexion with the forearm in neutral rotation and in 80 degrees of pronation and supination was performed under valgus and varus loads (1) in intact elbows, (2) after a surgical approach (lateral epicondylar osteotomy of the distal part of the humerus), (3) after release of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament, (4) after release of the anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament and resection of the radial head, and (5) after subsequent replacement of the radial head with each of three different types of radial head prostheses (a Wright monoblock titanium implant, a KPS bipolar Vitallium [cobalt-chromium]-polyethylene implant, and a Judet bipolar Vitallium-polyethylene-Vitallium implant) in the same cadaver elbow. Total valgus elbow laxity was quantified with use of an electromagnetic tracking device. RESULTS: The mean valgus laxity changed significantly (p < 0.001) as a factor of constraint alteration. The greatest laxity was observed after release of the medial collateral ligament together with resection of the radial head (11.1 degrees +/- 5.6 degrees). Less laxity was seen following release of the medial collateral ligament alone (6.8 degrees +/- 3.4 degrees), and the least laxity was seen in the intact state (3.4 degrees +/- 1.6 degrees). Forearm rotation had a significant effect (p = 0.003) on valgus laxity throughout the range of flexion. The laxity was always greater in pronation than it was in neutral rotation or in supination. The mean valgus laxity values for the elbows with a deficient medial collateral ligament and an implant were significantly greater than those for the medial collateral ligament-deficient elbows before radial head resection (p < 0.05). The implants all performed similarly except in neutral forearm rotation, in which the elbow laxity associated with the Judet implant was significantly greater than that associated with the other two implants. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study showed that a bipolar radial head prosthesis can be as effective as a solid monoblock prosthesis in restoring valgus stability in a medial collateral ligament-deficient elbow. However, none of the prostheses functioned as well as the native radial head, suggesting that open reduction and internal fixation to restore radial head anatomy is preferable to replacement when possible.     

Force transmission through the radial head

A technique has been developed to study the transmission of axial force across the radiohumeral joint during simulated active motion of the elbow. Variations in the line of action and in the amount of muscle load, as well as in rotation of the forearm during flexion and extension of the elbow, were assessed. Consistent patterns of force transmission were demonstrated in the three specimens that were studied. The greatest force transmission occurred between zero and 30 degrees of flexion, and it consistently decreased with increased flexion. Force transmission was consistently greater in magnitude when the forearm was in pronation than when it was in supination. The varus-valgus pivot point with the elbow extended was established to closely approximate the line of action of the brachial muscle, which crosses near the center of the lateral portion of the trochlea.     

Surgical management of forearm pronation

Active volitional supination enhances upper limb function. In the spastic forearm with pronation deformity, careful preoperative assessment of muscle function is necessary to design a treatment plan to improve supination. Concomitant procedures performed for flexion contractures have to be taken into consideration. The release of the forearm, wrist, and fingers from a contracted pronated position may unmask active supination or may make the need for a tendon transfer with supinatory activity obvious.     

The effect of suture fixation of type I coronoid fractures on the kinematics and stability of the elbow with and without medial collateral ligament repair

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of suture repair of type 1 coronoid fractures on elbow kinematics in ligamentously intact and medial collateral ligament (MCL)-deficient elbows. Cadaveric testing was performed in stable and MCL-deficient elbows with radial head arthroplasty and with the coronoid intact, with the coronoid fractured, and after suture repair. Ulna versus humerus angulation was measured during active motion. Varus and valgus motion pathways were measured during passive gravity-loaded flexion. With intact ligaments, there was a small increase in valgus angulation after a type 1 fracture that was not corrected with suture fixation. With MCL deficiency, there was no change in kinematics regardless of coronoid status. Type 1 coronoid fractures cause only small changes in elbow kinematics that are not corrected with suture repair. MCL repair, rather than type 1 coronoid fixation, should be considered if the elbow remains unstable after radial head repair or replacement and lateral ligament repair.