输尿管内D-J管置入治疗孕妇输尿管结石16例临床体会

目的 探讨输尿管内D-J管置入治疗孕妇输尿管结石合并顽固性肾绞痛的疗效及安全性.方法 选取2012年1月至2015年12月局麻下应用膀胱镜或输尿管镜放置输尿管D-J管治疗经保守治疗无效的肾绞痛孕妇16例,患者年龄19 ～38岁,孕周12 ～31周,结石最大径4～13mm,均为顽固性肾绞痛,部分患者有脓肾形成.结果 16例顽固性肾绞痛孕妇患侧输尿管放置D-J管后肾绞痛均缓解,无一例出现先兆流产症状,其中2例DJ-JD管自动滑出,再次置管后未再滑出.16例D-J管留置1～8个月,术后5例患者有尿频尿急现象,可耐受;3例患者有肉眼血尿,对症治疗后缓解;6例患者腰部轻度不适,可耐受,无流产发生.15例孕妇足月分娩,1例患者因胎膜早破早产1周,分娩胎儿均健健.分娩后10例结石已排出,另6例:4例行体外冲击波碎石(ESW-L)后结石成功排出,2例行经皮肾镜超生碎石取石术(PCNL)成功清除结石.结论 对于输尿管结石并发顽固肾绞痛孕妇,患侧输尿管置入D-J管是一种安全有效的治疗方法.     

输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石221例

目的探讨输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石的效果。方法2003年1月～2007年6月，对输尿管结石221例，采用单腿截石位（架健侧腿患侧下肢平放外展），在腰麻硬膜外联合麻醉下行输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术，碎石取石后常规留置双J管作为支架引流。结果221例手术时间15～118min，平均55min。结石位于上段16例、中段52例、下段153例，228枚结石均原位粉碎，碎石成功率100％，术中结石排净率为95．5％（211／221），7例碎石不满意及3例伴同侧肾结石者术后ESWL治愈。189例随访3～6个月，无结石残留及复发。结论输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石创伤小、疗效好，术后联合ESWL术可以提高结石清除率，是一种可供选择的治疗方式。     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi: what a powerful machine can achieve

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL, Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia) for distal ureteral calculi with the HM3 (Dornier Medical Systems, Inc.) lithotriptor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 585 consecutive patients with distal ureteral calculi were treated with ESWL using an unmodified HM3 lithotriptor. Of these patients 67 referred for treatment only for whom no followup was available were excluded from further analysis. The remaining 518 cases were followed until they were radiologically documented to be stone-free or considered treatment failures. Before ESWL additional procedures were performed in 144 patients, including stone push back, ureteral catheter or Double-J (Medical Engineering Corp., New York, New York) stent placement, percutaneous nephrostomy, ureteral endoscopic maneuvers or stone basket manipulation. A total of 374 patients needed no preliminary treatment before ESWL. RESULTS: Of the 518 patients 469 (91%) were successfully treated with 1 ESWL session, while 49 (9%) needed 2 or 3. Manipulation after ESWL was performed in 22 cases, including stent placement, percutaneous nephrostomy, ureteral endoscopic stone removal and a stone basket procedure. On day 1 after ESWL 327 patients (63%) were stone-free, 158 (30%) had less than 5 mm. fragments and 33 (7%) had more than 5 mm. fragments. At 3 months the stone-free rate increased to 97%. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that ESWL for distal ureteral calculi with the powerful unmodified HM3 lithotriptor has a high success rate with a low rate of minimally traumatic manipulations before and after intervention. Results in terms of the re-treatment and stone-free rates are superior to those of any other second or third generation lithotriptor and comparable to the results of the best ureteroscopic series.     

孤立肾上尿路结石的ESWL治疗

目的:总结孤立肾并发上尿路结石ESWL治疗的经验。方法:电压比非孤立肾者略低,JT-Ⅲ型机8～12kV,HB-V型机4～8kV;放电次数比非孤立肾者略少,Ⅲ型机1500～2000次,V型机3000～3500次;同时减慢冲击频率;间隔时间二周以上比非孤立肾者稍长。直径大于2cm或多发结石且颗粒较大者,先行经皮肾镜取石后残石再行ESWL,多发或直径大于1.5cm的结石留置双J管后再ESWL,梗阻引起急性肾功能减退者急诊ESWL或先行肾造瘘或逆行插管引流积水,肾功能基本恢复后再ESWL。结果:22例独肾结石除7例多发外,15例一次成功,6例输尿管结石除1例再碎石外,5例一次成功。结论:ESWL治疗孤立肾上尿路结石损伤小且疗效好。     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal stones. To what size is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy alone feasible?

The complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for large renal calculi could be reduced by insertion of ureteral stents. In a prospective study, the critical stone size for ESWL combined with ureteral stenting was looked for. Sixty consecutive patients entered the study, 17 patients suffered from renal calculi with a length of greater than 4 cm and a width of greater than 3 cm (group 1), and in 43 patients the calculi measured between 4 x 3 and 2.5 x 1.5 cm2 (group 2). ESWL was performed with the Dornier apparatus HM-3. A ureteral stent was placed immediately before ESWL. In group 1 with very large stones, significantly more obstructive problems were encountered. Three months after ESWL, only 6 of 14 (43%) were free of stones or with stone material likely to discharge spontaneously. In group 2, a success rate of 25 of 29 (86%) was noticed, which was considered satisfactory. For most stones greater than 4 x 3 cm2 the combination of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ESWL seems to be the preferred treatment.     

Primary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of staghorn renal calculi.

186 patients with partial and 55 patients with complete renal staghorn calculi were treated with primary extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) at the Department of Urology, University of Würzburg Medical School. Partial staghorn calculi required an average of 1.4, complete staghorn calculi an average of 2.2 treatment sessions using the Dornier HM 3 lithotriptor. 55% of all patients and 46% of the patients with complete staghorn calculi were rendered stone-free within 1 year after ESWL. Pretreatment urinary tract infections present in 50.6% of all patients could be reduced to 22.5% 1 year after ESWL. The most frequent complications after ESWL were ureteral obstruction caused by 'steinstrasse' (41.4%), fever (38.4%), and renal colics (29.4%). Severe complications needing open operative procedures or blood transfusions did not occur. 50% of all patients underwent auxiliary procedures (e.g. insertion of indwelling ureteral stents: 25.3%, percutaneous nephrostomy: 20.3%, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: 2.9%). Pretreatment insertion of an indwelling ureteral stent was found to reduce posttreatment complications as well as the need for percutaneous nephrostomy only in patients with partial staghorn calculi. The data presented in this study demonstrate that primary ESWL therapy can be safely and successfully performed in the majority of patients with renal staghorn calculi. In patients requiring complete removal of all stone fragments, a percutaneous lithotripsy can be performed following ESWL.     

体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾感染石

作者采用体外冲击波碎石术连续性治疗72例肾感染石,观察其疗效。部分性鹿角结石69例,完全性鹿角结石3例.总共93枚,直径1.4～4.7cm,平均2.2 cm。在16例结石体积较大的患者中,术前15例放置双J管,1例放置Dormia支架、单次治愈者63.89％(46例),2次者19.44％(14例),3次者9.72％(7例),4次者2.78％(2例),5次者2.78％(2例),失败者1.39％(1例)。术后因尿路感染发热者9例,均用抗生素治愈。作者认为,采用体外冲击波治疗肾感染石是一种安全有效的方法。并侧重探讨了碎石过程中的定位技术和冲击方法以及有关尿路感染的预防和治疗。     

ESWL monotherapy for large-volume renal calculi: efficacy and morbidity

We assessed the efficacy and morbidity of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) monotherapy in the treatment of 25 consecutive patients with large-volume renal calculi (surface area greater than or equal to 5.0 cm2). Eighteen of the calculi were infection (struvite) stones and 7 were sterile stones. In 21 cases internal ureteral stents were positioned before ESWL, but no patient underwent pretreatment percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) or percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PNL). An average of 2.1 procedures including ESWL, PCN, or ureteral interventions were required to achieve a stone-free renal collecting system and ureter, or residual stone particles less than 4 mm in diameter confined to the renal collecting system. Sixty percent of the patients required no ancillary procedures after ESWL. There were no differences in the mean duration of hospitalization, need for post-treatment ancillary procedures, time to clearance of ureteral fragments, and incidence of residual stone particles among patients with infection and sterile stones. Of 23 patients observed greater than three months (mean 10.9 mos) after ESWL, 43 percent had residual stone particles in the renal collecting system. Expansion of these particles or stone recurrence in the absence of residual particles has not been observed. We conclude that large volume renal calculi may be managed effectively and safely with ESWL monotherapy.     

Pediatric staghorn calculi: the role of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy with special reference to ureteral stenting

PURPOSE: Treatment for staghorn calculi in children represents a unique challenge. We assessed the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) (Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia) monotherapy for the management of staghorn calculi in children with special reference to ureteral stenting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From June 1992 to January 2001 we treated 42 children 9 months to 12 years old with staghorn stones using the Piezolith 2501 (Richard Wolf GmBH, Knittlingen, Germany) lithotriptor. The initial group of 19 patients underwent ESWL without prophylactic ureteral stenting, while in the latter group of 23 a Double-J (Medical Engineering Corp., New York, New York) ureteral stent was inserted immediately before the first ESWL session. Mean patient age, stone size, number of shock waves and ESWL sessions, hospital stay, stone-free rate and major complications were compared in the 2 groups. RESULTS: Overall 33 children (79%) were stone-free after 3 months. The 2 groups were comparable in regard to patient age, stone size, number of shock waves and ESWL sessions, and stone-free rates. Major complications developed in 21% of the unstented group, whereas none were observed in stented cases. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.035). Seven post-ESWL auxiliary procedures were required in the unstented group to manage complications. Hospital stay was significantly longer in the unstented compared with the stented group (p = 0.022). At a followup of 9 to 102 months (mean 47) stones recurred in 2 children, who were treated with further ESWL. CONCLUSIONS: ESWL monotherapy was an efficient and safe modality for the treatment of staghorn calculi in children. Stented patients had fewer major complications and a shorter hospital stay. Prophylactic ureteral stenting is advisable before ESWL for staghorn calculi in children.     

经皮肾穿刺造瘘术联合输尿管镜碎石术治疗梗阻性肾积脓86例体会

目的 总结经皮肾穿刺造瘘术(PCN)联合输尿管镜碎石术(URL)治疗结石梗阻性肾积脓的临床经验体会. 方法单侧输尿管结石导致单侧肾积脓患者86例.输尿管下段结石69例,中上段结石17例.右肾积脓34例,左肾积脓52例.病程2～57 d.86例均有不同程度患侧腰痛或腹痛伴不同程度发热.结石大小0.5 cm×0.8 cm～1.1 cm×1.8 cm.均行PCN联合URL治疗.结果 平均手术时间51(37～81)min.69例输尿管下段结石一次碎石、取石成功.17例输尿管中上段结石中6例术中击碎结石后碎石回缩至肾盂内.留置双J管后抗炎治疗7～16 d内结石碎块自行排出或由肾造瘘管排出,11例结石未被击碎即回缩至肾盂内,肾盂内留置双J管后经抗感染、支持对症治疗2～3周后行ESWL治疗.未发生感染加重、菌血症、败血症、休克等并发症. 结论应用PCN联合URL治疗结石梗阻性肾积脓疗效确切、迅速,创伤小,恢复快.     

肾鹿角形结石的3种治疗方法比较

目的：总结肾鹿角形结石的治疗经验。方法：应用体外冲击波碎石(ESWL)，开放手术，经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)，治疗鹿角形结石102例．并随访其疗效及并发症的发生率。结果：EWSL57例，3个月后结石排净率86％；开放手术36例．手术均获成功，无石率达92％；PCNL9例，3个月后结石排净率为89％。结论：PCNL加ESWL为首选方法，ESWL适用于无肾盂肾盏扩张的部分鹿角形结石．开放手术可作为适当的补充术式。     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stones using MPL 9000 spark gap technology and ultrasound monitoring

Between November 7, 1988 and December 31, 1989, 881 treatments were given with the MPL 9000 lithotriptor to 513 sites in 510 renal units in 464 patients. Of the stones 447 (87.1%) were in the kidney, 64 (12.5%) in the ureter and 2 (0.4%) in the bladder. Stone size was up to 2 cm. in 58.5% of the cases, greater than 2 to 3 cm. in 25.8% and more than 3 cm. in 15.7%, including complete or partial staghorn, or multiple stones. Of the patients 54.2% received only 1 treatment, 17.6% received 2 treatments and 28.2% received more than 2 treatments (re-treatment was necessary in 45.8%). The number of shocks used varied from 610 to 4,000 at 14 to 24 kv., the usual energy used being 18 kv. Of the stones 30.2% were treated after Double-J stents were inserted. A patient was declared stone-free only when no stone particle was visible on a plain abdominal x-ray (or ultrasound if the stone was radiolucent). X-rays 3 months after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) were available for review in 397 patients (79.9%) and 72.8% were stone-free (with the aforementioned criteria) at 6 months (61.5% without ancillary procedures and 11.3% after ancillary procedures). Of a subset of 106 patients 84% were stone-free within 3 months when ESWL was restricted to a smaller stone burden, the number of shock waves administered was increased and energy was restricted to 14 to 18 kv. Over-all, 9.1% of the patients needed ancillary measures, including percutaneous nephrostomy in 1.6%, push-back for ESWL in 1.9%, ureterorenoscopy in 5.4%, percutaneous nephrolithotomy in 0.6% and pyelolithotomy/ureterolithotomy in 2.8%. The MPL 9000 device has the unique combination of electrohydraulic shock wave generation and ultrasound monitoring. The latter attribute has the distinct advantage of avoiding radiation to allow for visualization of nonopaque renal and gallbladder calculi. In addition, because there is continuous stone visualization during fragmentation accurate stone targeting can be maintained. The combination of ultrasound monitoring and spark gap technology allows for effective stone fragmentation.     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for large renal calculi: the role of ureteral stents. A randomized trial

Ureteral stents reduce complications after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL*) and contribute to successful stone passage. However, some reports note complications that are attributed to indwelling ureteral stents. We randomized 64 patients with large renal calculi (stone burden more than 200 mm.2) for in situ treatment or treatment with a prophylactically inserted stent. We used a 6Ch round stent with single-coiled ends or a triangular shaped stent with double-coiled ends. Patients were treated with a Siemens Lithostar lithotriptor. After 3 months we evaluated the results of treatment and post-ESWL morbidity. Of the in situ group (23 patients) treatment complications consisted of fever in 3, pyelonephritis in 1 and steinstrasse in 3. After 3 months 8 patients (35%) were free of stones. Of the stented population (41 patients) treatment complications consisted of fever in 7, pyelonephritis in 1, steinstrasse in 6 and bladder discomfort in almost half of the patients. Stent calcification and stent migration were also seen in 7 and 10 patients, respectively. Calcified stents had been in situ longer than noncalcified stents. The round stents migrated and calcified more often than the more rigid triangular stents. After 3 months 18 of the stented patients were stone-free (44%). We conclude that ureteral stents do not reduce post-ESWL complications. They are clearly associated with morbidity and do not improve stone passage markedly. Therefore, patients with a stone burden of more than 200 mm.2 should be treated in situ without auxiliary stenting.     

Internet and postal survey of endourologic practice patterns among American urologists

PURPOSE: We determine endourological practice patterns among American urologists for the management of distal ureteral calculi, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, staghorn calculi and the use of ureteral stents with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWLdagger). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys were mailed by the United States postal service to 1,000 American urologists selected randomly from the American Urological Association membership roster. The same survey was sent via the Internet to 3,065 American urologists with an electronic mail address listed in the roster. RESULTS: Responses were received from 1,029 urologists (postal 601, Internet 428). Ureteroscopy was the preferred treatment for all distal ureteral calculi less than or equal to 10 mm. Acucisedouble dagger endopyelotomy was the most frequently selected therapy for adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (50.3%, 514 of 1,022). Open pyeloplasty was recommended by a significantly greater percentage of urologists in practice longer than 15 years compared with the remaining survey respondents (166 of 485, 34.2% versus 92 of 427, 21.5%). For patients with renal pelvic stones 10, 15 or 20 mm. who are treated with ESWL routine stent placement was preferred by 25.3% (259 of 1,022), 57.1% (584 of 1,022) and 87.1% (888 of 1, 019) of urologists, respectively. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy was preferred for patients with staghorn calculi by 80.5% (828 of 1,028) of survey respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Most urologists follow the American Urological Association practice guidelines for patients with distal ureteral calculi and staghorn stones. There is a significant difference of opinion regarding the use of stents with ESWL. No clear consensus has been reached concerning the management of adults with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. These data may be useful in designing physician education programs and/or future investigations to help define standard treatment practices for urological diseases.     

输尿管镜钬激光联合两重双J管引流术处理ESWL治疗失败的输尿管结石

目的：评价输尿管镜钬激光碎石联合腔内两重双J管引流术处理ESWL治疗失败输尿管结石的临床疗效,并探讨其影响因素。方法：2005年1月～2010年6月对ESWL失败的21例输尿管结石患者行输尿管镜钬激光碎石术,碎石后置入两根双J管,术后常规留置2～4周后拔除。结石合并息肉形成的13例患者均同期采用钬激光汽化切割息肉。结果：21例输尿管结石行钬激光碎石成功率达95．2%（20／21）,手术时间10～70min,平均（40．4±10．3）min;术后住院时间1～7天,平均（3．1土1．2）天。结论：输尿管镜钬激光碎石联合腔内两重双J管引流术处理ESWL治疗失败输尿管结石是安全可行的,保证结石清除率的同时不增加并发症发生率。     

钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较

目的　比较输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术 (ESWL)治疗输尿管结石的有效性和安全性。　方法　采用输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石 15 9例 16 8侧 ,其中结石直径≥ 1cm者 76侧 ,<1cm者 92侧。ESWL治疗输尿管结石 319例 334侧 ,其中结石直径≥ 1cm者 14 3侧 ,<1cm者 191侧。比较两组手术时间 结石排净率 手术并发症发生率指标的差异。　结果　对直径≥ 1cm和 <1cm的输尿管结石钬激光碎石术治疗平均手术时间分别为 5 8min和 4 3min ,短于ESWL的平均手术时间 6 8min和 5 6min(P <0 .0 1) ;钬激光碎石术对直径≥ 1cm的输尿管结石 3个月结石排净率为 92 % ,高于ESWL的 6 1% (P <0 .0 1) ;对直径 <1cm的输尿管结石钬激光碎石术和ESWL的 3个月结石排净率分别为 95 %和 85 % (P >0 .0 5 )。钬激光碎石术组并发症发生率为 4 .8%( 8/ 16 8) ,ESWL组无明显并发症发生。　结论　输尿管镜钬激光碎石术治疗直径≥ 1cm的输尿管结石疗效明显优于ESWL ,而直径 <1cm的结石二者疗效差异无显著性 ,ESWL为直径 <1cm结石的首选治疗方法     

Ureteric stone management using a second generation lithotriptor.

A series of 209 consecutive patients with ureteric calculi underwent 296 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments on the Siemens Lithostar over a 25-month period; 123 stones were upper ureteric, 30 mid-ureteric and 56 lower ureteric; 46.9% were right-sided stones, 53.6% were left-sided and 0.5% (1 patient) were bilateral. On referral, 60 patients had stents and 15 had nephrostomies for obstruction. All treatments were performed without anaesthesia except for 9 patients in whom stent insertion or ureteroscopic manipulations were attempted concomitant to ESWL. The average number of treatments was 1.42, with 27.5% of patients requiring more than 1 treatment. The average number of shocks per treatment was 3995 and the average hospital stay was 1.79 days. Complete clearance of the stone was achieved in 82% of upper ureteric stones, 89% of mid-ureteric and 80% of lower ureteric stones. The facility for X-ray localisation of stones allows a high proportion of ureteric calculi to be treated successfully by ESWL, including the more taxing middle and lower ureteric calculi.     

输尿管支架管在腔内泌尿外科的应用(附230例报告)

目的 探讨输尿管支架管在腔内泌尿外科手术中的适应证及并发症。方法 对230例复杂肾结石、输尿管结石、输尿管狭窄、肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻患者在腔内泌尿外科手术中应用输尿管支架管作内支架和内引流，置管时间1-12个月（一般小于5周）。结果 体外冲击波震波碎石术后肾结石排出顺利，未形成石街；输尿管结石、输尿管狭窄、肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻经输尿管镜腔内手术后梗阻均被解除，肾积水改善或消失；腔内插管延长了盆腔肿瘤晚期致输尿管梗阻患者的生存时间。结论 留置输尿管内支架管治疗效果肯定，操作简便，并发症少，在腔内泌尿外科手术中有良好的应用价值。     

Therapy of extrinsic ureteral obstruction with 2 parallel ureteral Double-J stents

We present our experiences with the approach of placing 2 parallel ureteral Double-J stents simultaneously in extrinsically obstructed ureters. In all 5 reported patients therapy with single ureteral stents had failed despite correct stent position. With the increased stiffness of 2 parallel ureteral silicon 7F Double-J stents ureteral kinking and luminal compression could be reduced leading to sufficient reduction of hydronephrosis. This approach with potential space between the stents preserves urinary flow through as well as around the stents which is considered to be the most important mechanism in stented ureters. In cases of extrinsic ureteral obstruction with failure of a single stent the simultaneous use of 2 parallel Double-J ureteral stents should be taken into account as a technically easy therapeutic option. It may obviate percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement or more invasive therapy.     

Epidural anesthesia is effective for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic and biliary calculi

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of thoracic epidural analgesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).METHODS: ESWL is an effective, non-invasive technique for the treatment of difficult pancreatic and large bile duct calculi. The procedure is often painful and requires large doses of analgesics. Many different anesthetic techniques have been used. Patients with either large bile duct calculi or pancreatic duct calculi which could not be extracted by routine endoscopic methods were selected. Thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA) was routinely used in all the subjects unless contraindicated. Bupivacaine 0.25% with or without clonidine was used to block the segments D6 to D12. The dose was calculated depending on the age, height and weight of the patient. It was usually 1-2 mL per segment blocked.RESULTS: Ninety eight percent of the 1509 patients underwent ESWL under TEA. The subjects selected were within American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I to III. ESWL using EA permitted successful elimination of bile duct or pancreatic calculi with minimal morbidity. The procedure time was shorter in patients with TEA than in those who underwent ESWL under total intravenous anesthesia.CONCLUSION: Almost all patients undergoing ESWL with EA had effective blocks with a single catheter insertion and local anesthetic injection.