Effect of adjunctive lamotrigine treatment on the plasma concentrations of clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder

The effect of lamotrigine on the steady-state plasma concentrations of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, and risperidone was investigated in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder stabilized on chronic treatment with clozapine (200-500 mg/day; n = 11), risperidone (3-6 mg/day; n = 10) or olanzapine (10-20 mg/day; n = 14)). Lamotrigine was titrated up to a final dosage of 200 mg/day over 8 weeks, and pharmacokinetic assessments were made at baseline and during treatment weeks 6 and 10, at lamotrigine dosages of 100 and 200 mg/day respectively. The plasma concentrations of clozapine, norclozapine, risperidone, and 9-hydroxy-risperidone did not change significantly during treatment with lamotrigine. The mean plasma concentrations of olanzapine were 31 +/- 7 ng/mL at baseline, 32 +/- 7 ng/mL at week 6, and 36 +/- 9 ng/mL at week 10, the difference between week 10 and baseline being statistically significant (P < 0.05). Adjunctive lamotrigine therapy was well tolerated in all groups. These findings indicate that lamotrigine, at the dosages recommended for use as a mood stabilizer, does not affect the plasma levels of clozapine, risperidone, and their active metabolites. The modest elevation in plasma olanzapine concentration, possibly due to inhibition of UGT1A4-mediated olanzapine glucuronidation, is unlikely to be of clinical significance.     

Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of olanzapine in rats

The single dose pharmacokinetics of olanzapine in rats, following an oral dose and its distribution in the brain and other tissues after repeated oral and intra-peritoneal (i.p.) administration, were studied. Olanzapine in plasma, brain, liver, lung, kidney, spleen and fat was assayed at predose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 12, 24, 36, 48 h postoral dose of 6 mg/kg and after daily oral and i.p. doses of 0.25, 1, 3, and 6 mg/kg/day of olanzapine for 15 consecutive days by a sensitive and specific HPLC method with electrochemical detection. Olanzapine was readily absorbed and distributed in plasma and tissues as the peak concentrations were reached within approximately 45 min after the oral dose. The terminal half-life of olanzapine in plasma was 2.5 h and in tissues it ranged from 3 to 5.2 h. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(last)) was lowest in plasma and largest in liver and lung. The AUC(last) of olanzapine was eight times larger in brain and three to 32 times larger in other tissues than that in plasma. After repeated oral doses, the plasma and tissue concentrations of olanzapine were generally higher than those after repeated i.p. doses. The liver and spleen had the highest concentrations after oral and i.p doses, respectively. In both cases, the tissue concentrations were four- to 46-fold higher than that in plasma and correlated with administered doses. Likewise, plasma concentrations strongly correlated with the simultaneous brain and tissue concentrations (r(2)>0.908, p<0.0001). On average, the brain levels were 6.3-13.1 and 5.4-17.6 times higher than the corresponding plasma level after oral and i.p. doses, respectively. The tissue to plasma level ratio of olanzapine was higher in other tissues. The data indicated that olanzapine is rapidly absorbed and widely distributed in the tissues of rats after oral and i.p. administration. The plasma concentration appears to predict the simultaneous concentration in brain and other tissues. There was no marked localized accumulation of olanzapine in any of the regions of the rat brain.     

Fluvoxamine augmentation of olanzapine in chronic schizophrenia: pharmacokinetic interactions and clinical effects

Olanzapine is a substrate of the cytochrome P450 enzyme (CYP) 1A2. In this study, pharmacokinetic interactions and clinical effects of adding the CYP1A2 inhibitor fluvoxamine to steady-state olanzapine was examined in patients suffering from schizophrenia. Eight patients had been treated for at least 3 months with 10 to 20 mg/day olanzapine. Fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) was added (week 0) to the olanzapine treatment and continued for 8 weeks. Concentrations of olanzapine and its metabolite N-desmethylolanzapine and of fluvoxamine were analyzed at weeks 0, 1, 4, and 8. Addition of fluvoxamine resulted in a 12% to 112% ( < 0.01) increase of olanzapine from 31 +/- SD 15 ng/mL (week 0) to 56 +/- 31 ng/mL (week 8) in all patients. N-desmethylolanzapine concentrations were not significantly changed ( > 0.05). Fluvoxamine concentrations were 48 +/- 26 ng/mL on week 1 and 83 +/- 47 ng/mL on week 8. It is concluded that fluvoxamine affects olanzapine degradation and thus increases olanzapine concentrations. Although the combination was well tolerated in this sample and the negative symptom response appeared to be favorable in at least five patients, the combination therapy of olanzapine and fluvoxamine should be used cautiously and should be controlled by therapeutic drug monitoring to avoid olanzapine-induced side effects or intoxications.     

Olanzapine plasma concentrations and clinical response: acute phase results of the North American Olanzapine Trial

Olanzapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is effective in the treatment of schizophrenia. Olanzapine plasma concentrations > or = 9.3 ng/mL (24 hours postdose) have been identified as a predictor of clinical response in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia. The authors report a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of 12-hour olanzapine concentrations and treatment response from the North American Double-Blind Olanzapine Trial. After a 4- to 7-day placebo lead-in, patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine, haloperidol, or placebo. Patients who were randomly assigned to receive olanzapine were given daily doses ranging from 2.5 to 17.5 mg/day for up to 6 weeks. Blood samples for the determination of olanzapine plasma concentrations were obtained between 10 and 16 hours (11.7 +/- 1.7 hours) after the last dose was administered. Therapeutic response data and olanzapine concentrations used for analysis were obtained from the endpoint visit for each patient if the patient had been receiving a fixed olanzapine dose for at least the last 2 weeks of the study. Plasma concentrations from previous visits were used if endpoint concentrations were invalid. Response was defined as a > or = 20% reduction in Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) scores and a Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity scale score of < or = 3 or a final BPRS score of < or = 35. The final ROC analysis included data from 84 patients and suggested an olanzapine concentration > or = 23.2 ng/mL to be a predictor of therapeutic response. Fifty-two percent of patients with 12-hour olanzapine concentrations > or = 23.2 ng/mL responded, whereas only 25% of patients with concentrations < 23.2 ng/mL responded. Furthermore, an olanzapine concentration > or = 23.2 ng/mL was a predictor of response in the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (> or = 20% decrease and endpoint CGI < or = 3). Olanzapine concentrations were found to be a function of olanzapine dose (in milligrams per day) and gender such that prospective olanzapine dosing is feasible. A 12-hour olanzapine plasma concentration of > 23.2 ng/mL was a predictor of therapeutic response in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia. Males required a higher olanzapine dose to reach this threshold concentration than their female counterparts.     

The effects of clozapine and high-dose olanzapine on brain function in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a case study

Although demonstrating superior efficacy in people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine may cause serious side effects, requires blood monitoring and is costly to administer. Olanzapine is similar to clozapine in molecular structure and pharmacologic action but has not demonstrated as robust results as clozapine at routine doses (10-25 mg). Here we present a case study measuring blood flow by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for a patient treated sequentially with a high dose of olanzapine (50 mg/day) followed by clozapine each for 8 weeks in a double-blind design. During a task, clozapine produced more brain activation patterns than during treatment with olanzapine or during the drug free condition (2 week washout). Clozapine resulted in recruitment of frontal, parietal and cingulate regions that did not appear to be active during olanzapine in this 44 year old right handed male. Additionally, a more robust decrease in symptoms was noted on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score than with olanzapine treatment. These findings suggest that high doses of olanzapine do not produce similar brain activation patterns as clozapine in people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.     

Lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between mirtazapine and the newer antipsychotics clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine in patients with chronic schizophrenia.

The effect of mirtazapine on steady-state plasma concentrations of the newer atypical antipsychotics clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine was investigated in 24 patients with chronic schizophrenia. In order to treat residual negative symptoms, additional mirtazapine (30 mg per day) was administered for six consecutive weeks to nine patients stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-650 mg per day), eight on risperidone (3-8 mg per day) and seven on olanzapine (10-20mg per day). There were only minimal and statistically insignificant changes in mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and its metabolite norclozapine, risperidone and its metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone, and olanzapine during the study period. Mirtazapine co-administration with either clozapine, risperidone or olanzapine was well tolerated. In the overall sample, a slight improvement in negative symptomatology, as assessed by the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms, was observed at final evaluation (P<0.01) and six patients (two in each treatment group) were classified as responders. While double-blind, controlled studies are needed to evaluate the potential clinical benefits of mirtazapine in chronic schizophrenia, our findings indicate that mirtazapine has a negligible effect on the metabolism of clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine and can be added safely to an existing treatment with these antipsychotics.     

Effects of olanzapine and clozapine on radial maze performance in naive and MK-801-treated mice

Attention, working memory and long-term memory dysfunctions are the most commonly seen cognitive impairments in schizophrenic patients. Conflicting results exist regarding the effects of antipsychotics on cognitive abnormalities. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of atypical antipsychotic drugs olanzapine (0.4, 0.8 and 1.25?mg/kg, i.p.) and clozapine (0.5 and 1?mg/kg, i.p.) on spatial working memory in naive and MK-801 (0.2?mg/kg, i.p.) treated BALB-c mice in an 8-arm radial arm maze (RAM) task. None of the antipsychotic drugs studied altered number of errors in naive mice, whereas MK-801 significantly increased working memory errors in RAM test. Olanzapine and clozapine potently reversed MK-801 induced increasement of working memory errors. Olanzapine and clozapine prolonged latency of the animals in naive mice. The MK-801-induced enhancement in the speed of mice in performing the RAM task was blocked by olanzapine but not clozapine. Our study shows that atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and clozapine might improve cognitive deficits in schizophrenic patients.     

Plasma olanzapine in relation to prescribed dose and other factors: data from a therapeutic drug monitoring service, 1999-2009

Olanzapine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the measurement of plasma olanzapine to assess adherence and guide dosage. We have audited data from an olanzapine TDM service, 1999-2009. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to investigate the contribution of dose, age, sex, body weight, and smoking status to the plasma olanzapine concentration. There were 5856 samples from 3207 patients. The prescribed olanzapine dosage was 2.5 to 95 mg/d. No olanzapine was detected in 6% of samples. For olanzapine dosages of 2.5 to 20 mg/d, only 35% of results were within a suggested target range of 20 to 39 ng/mL. At doses above 20 mg/d, 30% to 59% of results were 60 ng/mL or greater depending on dose band. In patients aged 17 years or younger (92 samples), median plasma olanzapine was higher than that in adult patients at almost all olanzapine doses. Multiple linear regression analysis of results from 627 adults from whom complete data were available showed that dose, smoking status, sex, age, and body weight together explained 24% the variance in plasma olanzapine. Degree of adherence, timing of sample postdose, drug-drug interactions, and pharmacogenetic factors also may have contributed to the observed variance. However, it is clear that female nonsmokers had higher plasma olanzapine concentrations for a given dose than male smokers. Olanzapine TDM is useful in assessing adherence and may have a role in limiting olanzapine dosage to minimize the risk of long-term toxicity.     

Effects of age and sex on olanzapine plasma concentrations

Age and sex may influence both efficacy and side effects of second-generation antipsychotics. Women and elderly patients tend to have a higher prevalence for several side effects. Higher plasma levels in these groups of patients may be one reason. We studied the hypothesis that steady-state olanzapine plasma concentrations depend on age and sex. Sixty-seven inpatients on stable olanzapine dose were referred to routine therapeutic drug monitoring of olanzapine. Plasma levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Obtained data were then analyzed by analysis of covariance. Olanzapine plasma levels showed a marked sex difference with significantly higher mean concentrations in female patients (adjusted mean concentrations, 18.5 ng/mL for men and 31.7 ng/mL for women; P = 0.003). On average, the weight-corrected concentration/dose ratios shown by women were 33.5% higher than those shown by men, irrespective of age. Regarding the effect of age, weight-corrected concentration/dose ratios increased by an average of 9.4% per decade of life. All results were adjusted for smoking. Comedication did not significantly influence these results. In conclusion, age and sex are important variables to consider when prescribing olanzapine for women and in the elderly.     

Influence of ritonavir on olanzapine pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers

HIV infection and psychotic illnesses frequently coexist. The atypical antipsychotic olanzapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2 and glucuronosyl transferases, both of which are induced by the HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of olanzapine. Fourteen healthy volunteers (13 men; age range, 20-28 years) participated in this open-label study. Subjects received olanzapine 10 mg and blood samples were collected over a 120-hour post-dose period. Two weeks later, subjects took ritonavir 300 mg twice daily for 3 days, 400 mg twice daily for 4 days, and 500 mg twice daily for 4 days. The next morning, after 11 days of ritonavir, olanzapine 10 mg was administered and blood sampling was repeated. Plasma samples were analyzed for olanzapine with HPLC. We compared olanzapine noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameter values before and after ritonavir with a paired Student t test. Ritonavir reduced the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of olanzapine from 501 ng. hr/mL (443-582) to 235 ng. hr/mL (197-294) (p < 0.001), the half-life from 32 hours (28-36) to 16 hours (14-18) (p = 0.00001), and the peak concentration from 15 ng/mL (13-19) to 9 ng/mL (8-12) (p = 0.002). Olanzapine oral clearance increased from 20 L/hr (18-23) to 43 L/hr (38-51) (p < 0.001) after ritonavir. Ritonavir significantly reduced the systemic exposure of olanzapine in volunteers. Patients receiving this combination may ultimately require higher olanzapine doses to achieve desired therapeutic effects.     

Olanzapine and clozapine increase the GABAergic neuroactive steroid allopregnanolone in rodents.

The neuroactive steroid allopregnanolone is a potent gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor modulator with anxiolytic and anticonvulsant effects. Olanzapine and clozapine also have anxiolytic-like effects in behavioral models. We therefore postulated that olanzapine and clozapine would elevate allopregnanolone levels, but risperidone and haloperidol would have minimal effects. Male rats received intraperitoneal olanzapine (2.5-10.0 mg/kg), clozapine (5.0-20.0 mg/kg), risperidone (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), or vehicle. Cerebral cortical allopregnanolone and peripheral progesterone and corticosterone levels were determined. Adrenalectomized animals were also examined. Both olanzapine and clozapine increased cerebral cortical allopregnanolone levels, but neither risperidone nor haloperidol had significant effects. Olanzapine and clozapine also increased serum progesterone and corticosterone levels. Adrenalectomy prevented olanzapine- and clozapine-induced elevations in allopregnanolone. Allopregnanolone induction may contribute to olanzapine and clozapine anxiolytic, antidepressant, and mood-stabilizing actions. Alterations in this neuroactive steroid may result in the modulation of GABAergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission, potentially contributing to antipsychotic efficacy.     

Efficacy of olanzapine in social anxiety disorder: a pilot study

Based on evidence suggesting anxiolytic properties of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine, this study was conducted to evaluate whether olanzapine may be efficacious in treating social anxiety disorder (SAD). This study was an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of olanzapine as monotherapy in which 12 patients with the DSM-IV diagnosis of SAD were randomized to either olanzapine (n = 7) or placebo (n = 5). An initial dose of 5 mg/day was titrated to a maximum of 20 mg/day. Baseline to endpoint scores from the Brief Social Phobia Scale (BSPS), Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN), Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale and Sheehan Disability Scale, as well as Clinical Global Impression-Improvement ratings, were compared for olanzapine versus placebo. Seven subjects completed all 8 weeks of the study, four in the olanzapine group and three in the placebo group. In the intent-to-treat analysis, olanzapine yielded greater improvement than placebo on the primary measures: BSPS (p = 0.02) and SPIN (p = 0.01). Both treatments were well tolerated, although the olanzapine group had more drowsiness and dry mouth. Olanzapine and placebo were both associated with negligible weight gain. Olanzapine was superior to placebo on the primary outcome measures in this preliminary study of SAD. Additional studies of olanzapine as a treatment for SAD are warranted.     

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between lamotrigine and olanzapine in healthy volunteers

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential drug-drug interaction between lamotrigine, an antiepileptic agent used to treat bipolar disorders, and olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic drug also used to treat bipolar disorders, both of which are metabolized by the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase system. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University center for clinical research. SUBJECTS: Fourteen nonsmoking, healthy volunteers. INTERVENTION: Subjects received lamotrigine 25 mg/day for 5 days, then 50 mg/day for 10 days to achieve steady-state concentrations. On day 15, blood samples were obtained before and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours after the dose. Lamotrigine 50 mg/day was then given for an additional 3 days. On the next day, lamotrigine 50 mg and olanzapine 5 mg were coadministered. Blood samples were obtained at the same times as before and at 48, 72, and 96 hours after dosing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood samples were assayed for lamotrigine and olanzapine concentrations by means of high-performance liquid chromatography. Olanzapine did not significantly affect lamotrigine disposition, as we observed no differences in the area under the concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours or in lamotrigine plasma concentrations at baseline or at 24 hours. For lamotrigine, the mean time to reach maximum concentration was significantly prolonged during olanzapine coadministration (mean +/- SD 1.9 +/- 1.3 vs 4.0 +/- 3.0 hrs, p = 0.025), possibly because of the anticholinergic properties associated with olanzapine. Mild sedation was the only adverse effect that occurred during lamotrigine and olanzapine coadministration. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine and olanzapine can safely be combined in healthy volunteers at the low doses studied, without a clinically significant interaction. When prescribing high doses of olanzapine and lamotrigine for bipolar disorder, patients must be carefully monitored.     

Relationship between plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine and therapeutic response in patients with schizophrenia resistant to conventional neuroleptics

Rationale: Monitoring plasma clozapine concentrations may play a useful role in the management of patients with schizophrenia, but information on the relationship between the plasma levels of the drug and response is still controversial. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between plasma concentrations of clozapine and its weakly active metabolite norclozapine and clinical response in patients with schizophrenia resistant to conventional neuroleptics. Methods: Forty-five patients, 35 males and ten females, aged 19–65 years, were given clozapine at a dosage up to 500 mg/day for 12 weeks. Steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine were measured at week 12 by a specific HPLC assay. Psychopathological state was assessed at baseline and at week 12 by using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and patients were considered responders if they showed a greater than 20% reduction in total BPRS score compared with baseline and a final BPRS score of 35 or less. Results: Mean plasma clozapine concentrations were higher in responders (n=18) than in non-responders (n=27) (472±220 versus 328±128 ng/ml, P<0.01), whereas plasma norclozapine levels did not differ between the two groups (201±104 versus 156±64 ng/ml, NS). A significant positive correlation between plasma levels and percent decrease in total BPRS score was found for clozapine (r _s=0.371, P<0.02), but not for norclozapine (r _s=0.162, NS). A cutoff value at a clozapine concentration of about 350 ng/ml differentiated responders from non-responders with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 70%. At a cutoff of 400 ng/ml, sensitivity was 67% and specificity 78%. The incidence of side effects was twice as high at clozapine concentrations above 350 ng/ml compared with lower concentrations (38% versus 17%). Conclusions: These results suggest that plasma clozapine levels are correlated with clinical effects, although there is considerable variability in the response achieved at any given drug concentration. Because many patients respond well at plasma clozapine concentrations in a low range, aiming initially at plasma clozapine concentrations of 350 ng/ml or greater would require in some patients use of unrealistically high dosages and imply an excessive risk of side effects. Increasing dosage to achieve plasma levels above 350–400 ng/ml may be especially indicated in patients without side effects who failed to exhibit amelioration of psychopathology at standard dosages or at lower drug concentrations. Received: 5 May 1999 / Final version: 30 August 1999     

The differential effects of steady-state fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of olanzapine and clozapine in healthy volunteers

The combination of atypical antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is an effective strategy in the treatment of certain psychiatric disorders. However, pharmacokinetic interactions between the two classes of drugs remain to be explored. The present study was designed to determine whether there were different effects of steady-state fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of olanzapine and clozapine in healthy male volunteers. One single dose of 10 mg olanzapine (n = 12) or clozapine (n = 9) was administered orally. Following a drug washout of at least 4 weeks, all subjects received fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) for 9 days, and one single dose of 10 mg olanzapine or clozapine was added on day 4. Plasma concentrations of olanzapine, clozapine, and N-desmethylclozapine were assayed at serial time points after the antipsychotics were given alone and when added to fluvoxamine. No bioequivalence was found in olanzapine alone and cotreatment with fluvoxamine for the mean peak plasma concentration (C(max)), the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to last sampling time point (AUC(0-t)), and from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0- infinity )). Under the cotreatment, C(max) of olanzapine was significantly elevated by 49%, with a 32% reduced time (t(max)) to C(max), whereas the C(max) and t(max) of clozapine were unaltered. The cotreatment increased the AUC(0-t) and AUC(0- infinity ) of olanzapine by 68% and 76%, respectively, greater than those of clozapine (40% and 41%). The presence of fluvoxamine also prolonged the elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of olanzapine by 40% and, to a much greater extent, clozapine by 370% but reduced the total body clearance (CL/F) of clozapine (78%) more significantly than it did for olanzapine (42%). The apparent volume of distribution (V(d)) was suppressed by 31% in olanzapine combined with fluvoxamine but was unaltered in the clozapine regimen. A significant reduction in the N-desmethylclozapine to clozapine ratio was present in the clozapine with fluvoxamine regimen. The effects of fluvoxamine on different aspects of pharmacokinetics of the two antipsychotics may have implications for clinical therapeutics.     

Lack of Effect of Olanzapine on the Pharmacokinetics of a Single Aminophylline Dose in Healthy Men

Study Objective . To test whether olanzapine, an atypical antipsychotic, is an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 activity, we conducted a drug interaction study with theophylline, a known CYP1A2 substrate. Design . Two-way, randomized, crossover study. Setting . Clinical research laboratory. Subjects . Nineteen healthy males (16 smokers, 3 nonsmokers). Interventions . Because the a priori expectation was no effect of olanzapine on theophylline pharmacokinetics, a parallel study using cimetidine was included as a positive control. In group 1, 12 healthy subjects received a 30-minute intravenous infusion of aminophylline 350 mg after 9 consecutive days of either olanzapine or placebo. In group 2, seven healthy subjects received a similar aminophylline infusion after 9 consecutive days of either cimetidine or placebo. Measurements and Main Results . Concentrations of theophylline and its metabolites in serum and urine were measured for 24 and 72 hours, respectively. Plasma concentrations of olanzapine and its metabolites were measured for 24 hours after the next to last dose and 168 hours after the last olanzapine dose. Olanzapine did not affect theophylline pharmacokinetics. However, cimetidine significantly decreased theophylline clearance and the corresponding formation of its metabolites. Urinary excretion of theophylline and its metabolites was unaffected by olanzapine but was reduced significantly by cimetidine. Steady-state concentrations of olanzapine (15.3 ng/ml), 10-N-glucuronide (4.9 ng/ml), and 4′-N-desmethyl olanzapine (2.5 ng/ml) were observed after olanzapine 10 mg once/day and were unaffected by coadministration of theophylline. Conclusion . As predicted by in vitro studies, steady-state concentrations of olanzapine and its metabolites did not affect theophylline pharmacokinetics and should not affect the pharmacokinetics of other agents metabolized by the CYP1A2 isozyme.     

Effects of cocaine and putative atypical antipsychotics on rat social behavior: an ethopharmacological study

The effects of cocaine, amperozide, clozapine, olanzapine and cocaine/atypical antipsychotic combinations on aggression, affiliation and defensive behaviors was examined. Acute cocaine (30.0 mg/kg) decreased basal aggression and affiliation yet increased basal defense. Amperozide (1.0, 3.0 and 5.0 mg/kg) decreased basal aggression, affiliation and defense had no effect on the cocaine-induced decrease in affiliation, and accentuated the cocaine-induced decrease in aggression. Near basal levels of defense were observed for animals treated with either amperozide, clozapine (3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg but not 30.0 mg/kg) or olanzapine followed by cocaine. Clozapine (3.0, 10.0 and 30.0 mg/kg) decreased basal aggression and affiliation. Clozapine (30.0 mg/kg but not 3.0 or 10.0 mg/kg) decreased basal defense. Clozapine attenuated the cocaine-induced decrease in aggression. Although 3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg clozapine attenuated the cocaine-induced decrease in affiliation, 30.0 mg/kg clozapine accentuated this cocaine-induced effect. Olanzapine (1.0, 3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg) decreased basal aggression, affiliation and defense. Olanzapine had no effect on the cocaine-induced decrease in aggression. Olanzapine (3.0 mg/kg but not 1.0 or 10.0 mg/kg) attenuated the cocaine-induced decrease in affiliation. Thus, acute cocaine administration had an antiaggressive effect, suppressed affiliative behavior and enhanced defensive behavior. Amperozide, clozapine and olanzapine have anticonflict and anxiolytic effects, as well as potent and specific antiaggressive effects.     

No effect of reboxetine on plasma concentrations of clozapine, risperidone, and their active metabolites.

The effect of reboxetine on steady-state plasma concentrations of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and risperidone was studied in 14 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with associated depressive symptoms. Seven patients stabilized on clozapine therapy (250-500 mg/day) and seven receiving risperidone (4-6 mg/day) were given additional reboxetine (8 mg/day). After 4 weeks of reboxetine therapy, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine, norclozapine, and risperidone active moiety (sum of concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone) increased slightly but not significantly by 5%, 2%, and 10%, respectively. The mean plasma clozapine/norclozapine and risperidone/9-hydroxyrisperidone ratios were not modified during reboxetine treatment. Reboxetine coadministration with either clozapine or risperidone was well tolerated. These findings indicate that reboxetine has minimal effects on the metabolism of clozapine and risperidone and may be added safely to patients receiving maintenance treatment with these two antipsychotics.     

Differential effects of olanzapine and risperidone on plasma adiponectin levels over time: Results from a 3-month prospective open-label study

Second-generation antipsychotics (SGA), especially clozapine and olanzapine, are associated with an increased metabolic risk. Recent research showed that plasma adiponectin levels, an adipocyte-derived hormone that increases insulin sensitivity, vary in the same way in schizophrenic patients as in the general population according to gender, adiposity and metabolic syndrome (MetS). The aim of the present study was to investigate whether different SGAs differentially affect plasma adiponectin levels independent of body mass index (BMI) and MetS status.113 patients with schizophrenia (65.5% males, 32.3 years old) who were free of antipsychotic medication were enrolled in this open-label prospective single-center study and received either risperidone (n = 54) or olanzapine (n = 59). They were followed prospectively for 12 weeks. Average daily dose was 4.4 mg/day for risperidone and 17.4 mg/day for olanzapine. Plasma adiponectin levels as well as fasting metabolic parameters were measured at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks.The two groups had similar baseline demographic and metabolic characteristics. A significant increase in body weight was observed over time. This increase was significantly larger in the olanzapine group than in the risperidone group (+ 7.0 kg versus + 3.1 kg, p < 0.0002). Changes in fasting glucose and insulin levels and in HOMA-IR, an index of insulin resistance, were not significantly different in both treatment groups. MetS prevalence increased significantly more in the olanzapine group as compared to the risperidone groups where the prevalence did not change over time. We observed a significant (p = 0.0015) treatment by time interaction showing an adiponectin increase in the risperidone-treated patients (from 10,154 to 11,124 ng/ml) whereas adiponectin levels decreased in olanzapine treated patients (from 11,280 to 8988 ng/ml). This effect was independent of BMI and the presence/absence of MetS.The differential effect of antipsychotic treatment (risperidone versus olanzapine) on plasma adiponectin levels over time, independent of changes in waist circumference and antipsychotic dosing, suggests a specific effect on adipose tissues, similar to what has been observed in animal models. The observed olanzapine-associated reduction in plasma adiponectin levels may at least partially contribute to the increased metabolic risk of olanzapine compared to risperidone.     

Is the time course of clozapine response correlated to the time course of clozapine plasma levels? A one-year prospective study in drug-resistant patients with schizophrenia.

The relationship between the time course of clinical response to clozapine and the time course of clozapine plasma levels has never been investigated. In the present study, we assessed prospectively the clinical response to clozapine and the plasma levels of the drug and its major metabolites in 32 drug-resistant patients with schizophrenia kept on a fixed dose of 600 mg/day for 1 year Four of the patients met response criteria at week 4 of treatment. At weeks 8, 12, and 24, new responders were 7, 6, and 6, respectively. Nine patients never achieved clinical response. In responders at week 4, clozapine and clozapine-N-oxide plasma levels were significantly higher than in both new responders at weeks 8, 12, and 24 and nonresponders. In new responders at weeks 8, 12, and 24, in spite of a fixed clozapine daily dose, mean drug plasma levels progressively rose up to when clinical response occurred; then, the levels remained stable over time. Nonresponders exhibited mean clozapine plasma levels constantly below the value of 260 ng/ml, with N-demethylation as the preferred metabolic route.The present findings show, for the first time, that the time course of the clinical response to clozapine may be linked to the time course of plasma levels of clozapine and its major metabolites.