Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor–based immunosuppression to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors or belatacept in renal transplant recipients

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) remain the standard of care for maintenance immunosuppression following renal transplantation. CNIs have demonstrated their effectiveness in reducing acute cellular rejection; however, some evidence suggests that these compounds negatively affect native renal function and are associated with allograft injury in renal transplant recipients. CNIs have also been linked with hypertension, new‐onset diabetes after transplantation, tremor, and thrombotic microangiopathy, which have significant consequences for long‐term allograft function and patient health overall. Thus, converting patients to a non‐CNI‐based regimen may improve renal function and also provide extrarenal benefits. A number of studies have been conducted that explore CNI conversion strategies in renal transplant recipients in an effort to improve long‐term allograft function and survival. These include converting to alternative, non‐nephrotoxic, maintenance immunosuppressants, such as the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus) and the costimulation blocker belatacept. In this review of literature, evidence for the potential renal and extrarenal benefits of conversion to these non‐CNI‐based regimens is evaluated. Clinical challenges, including the adverse event profiles of non‐CNI‐based regimens and the selection of candidates for conversion, are also examined.     

Conversion to belatacept maintenance immunosuppression in HIV-positive kidney transplant recipients

There are only scattered case reports documenting belatacept use in HIV + kidney transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective review to describe short-term outcomes following conversion to belatacept in a cohort of HIV + patients. Patients were included if they were converted to belatacept between May 2015 and May 2019, had an HIV- donor, and received ≥4 doses of belatacept. All patients were treated with non-depleting induction and triple maintenance immunosuppression. Allograft and HIV-related outcomes were collected from the date of belatacept infusion until May 2020. Ten HIV + kidney transplant recipients were identified, who were converted to belatacept a median of 364 days post-transplant. At last follow-up (median 3.3 years), 8 patients remained on belatacept therapy, and all patients were alive with functioning allografts. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) improved from 31.6 mL/min at baseline to 42.8 mL/min at 1 year (P = .03). Two patients developed acute rejection, with one necessitating conversion back to tacrolimus. All patients maintained undetectable HIV-1 viral loads at last follow-up. One patient each developed pneumocystis pneumonia and Kaposi sarcoma following conversion, which were responsive to standard medical therapy. In our cohort of stable HIV + kidney transplant recipients, conversion to belatacept was associated with excellent early patient and allograft survival and improved eGFR at 1 year.     

Withdrawal of steroid immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients

The complications of long-term steroid immunosuppression are well known. During a 12-month period, 52 living-donor renal transplant recipients were entered into a protocol of intentional early steroid withdrawal. Selection criteria were primary living-related renal transplants in HLA-identical (12) or one-haplotype match (40) patients. The study population consisted of 25 diabetics (48.1%) with a mean age of 32.4 years. All patients received preoperative blood transfusions (3 donor-specific in haplotype-matched, 3 random in HLA-identical recipients). Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine, azathioprine, and corticosteroids, with deliberate steroid withdrawal after two weeks. Forty-six patients (88.5%) were successfully tapered off steroids, while the six protocol failures (11.5%) were due to early rejection or leukopenia that prevented steroid withdrawal. Twenty-three patients (50%) subsequently were returned to steroid therapy for rejection (21) or leukopenia (2). Inadequate immunosuppression precipitated six rejection episodes and were preventable, while the remaining 15 were true breakthrough crises. The overall rejection rate was 50%, with 92.3% of initial rejection episodes occurring within five weeks of steroid withdrawal. Rejection episodes were responsive to steroid therapy alone in 73.2% of cases. No graft loss from rejection has occurred after a mean follow-up interval of 8.5 months. At present, 33 patients (63.5%) are off steroids. In HLA-identical recipients, all but one successfully completed the protocol and 75% are currently steroid-free. In haplotype-matched patients, 87.5% completed the protocol and 60% are steroid-independent. Comparison with well-matched control groups on steroids failed to reveal any difference in graft or patient survival, rejection, infection, or mean serum creatinine level. No discriminating risk factors could be identified that were predictive of steroid withdrawal success or failure. In select patients, early steroid withdrawal can be accomplished without jeopardizing graft function. Long-term follow-up is required to assess the risk-benefit ratio of steroid withdrawal upon immunosuppressive morbidity.     

Pneumonitis associated with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in renal transplant recipients: a single-center experience

Background

The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) sirolimus (Si) and everolimus (Ev) induce pneumonitis, an unusual but potentially fatal adverse effect. We report 8 cases of suspected mTORi-induced pneumonitis over a 9-years experience from 2000 to 2009.

Methods

The switch from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNi) was made due to chronic transplant nephropathy, tumors, nephrotoxicity, or for rejection prophylaxis.

Results

One hundred six patients were switched from CNi to Si (n = 29) or Ev (n = 134). Twenty-five additional patients were treated de novo with mTORi. The 8 patients (3 Si, 5 Ev) who developed pneumonitis included 5 females and 3 males of median age, 59.1 years (range, 40-68). The median time from switch to pneumonitis onset was 292 days (range, 60-982). The clinical presentation included fatigue (n = 6), fever (n = 7), dyspnea (n = 6), dry cough (n = 6), and weight loss (n = 5). In most cases, imaging tests (chest radiograph, computerized tomography) revealed bilateral lower lobe involvement. Bronchoalveolar lavage showed a lymphocytic alveolitis in 5 subjects with negative cultures. All patients recovered after mTORi withdrawal. All patients were treated with antibiotics and five with steroids.

Conclusion

mTORi associated pneumonitis is not a rare disease. It is equally induced by Si or Ev. Pneumonitis was not apparently dependent on the drug dose or the blood levels. Discontinuation of mTORi seems to be the safest treatment option to avoid pulmonary fibrosis or a fatal outcome.     

Methylprednisolone disposition in renal transplant recipients receiving triple-drug immunosuppression

Renal transplant patients commonly receive triple-drug immunosuppression with standardized doses of cyclosporine, azathioprine, and methylprednisolone. Although cyclosporine may decrease the clearance of oral prednisone, data are lacking for methylprednisolone, a glucocorticoid commonly prescribed via a standardized protocol for intravenous therapy and during periods of acute rejection. The disposition of methylprednisolone (doses: 10-60 mg/day) was examined in nine renal transplant patients during the post-transplant period (0.8-14 months). Plasma samples were collected over 24 hr and analyzed for methylprednisolone via HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by noncompartmental analysis. The mean total clearance of methylprednisolone was 379 ml/hr/kg (range 105-672) and the volume of distribution was 1.4 +/- 0.5 L/kg. The mean plasma half-life was 2.7 +/- 1.1 hr. When normalized to a 1 mg dose of methylprednisolone, the mean peak concentration at 1 hr was 10.0 +/- 3.5 ng/ml with an 8 hr concentration ranging from 0.3 to 5.5 ng/ml. An appreciable variability in methylprednisolone metabolism thus exists in renal transplant recipients receiving triple-drug immunosuppression. This may partially explain the variable response to steroid therapy during acute rejection episodes and chronic immunosuppression as well as the unpredictable occurrence of chronic steroid toxicity.     

Conversion from cyclosporine to sirolimus in stable renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to sirolimus (SRL) has mainly been done in clinical conditions warranting calcineurin inhibitor discontinuation. Little is known about the clinical outcome of conversion in renal transplant recipients without transplant dysfunction. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, multicentric pilot study evaluates the safety and efficacy of converting patients with stable renal function from CsA to SRL. RESULTS: Forty stable patients on CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1.5 g/day), and steroids (ST) were converted at 7.6+/-1.4 months after renal transplantation. At 1 year, graft and patient survival was 100% and the incidence of acute rejection 5%. Calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increased from 54+/-18 to 66+/-16 ml/min (P<0.0001). Blood pressure remained unchanged. A gradual increase in the incidence and severity of proteinuria was observed from month 6 onwards with de novo proteinuria in 30% of the patients at 1 year. Protein excretion was below 1 g/day in 12.5%, between 1 and 3 g/day in 17.5% and above 3 g/day in 7.5% of the proteinuric cohort (P=0.0043, compared to baseline). No predictors could be identified for the development of proteinuria. All patients had a reduction in protein excretion following renin-angiotensin blockade and were continued on SRL. CONCLUSION: Conversion of stable renal transplant recipients from a CsA-MMF-ST to a SRL-MMF-ST regimen is safe and results in improved renal function but is associated with the development of proteinuria in 30% of the patients requiring renin-angiotensin blockade.     

Optimization of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppression administered to renal transplant recipients

Kidney transplant recipients administered belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression present with a more favorable metabolic profile, reduced incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and improved renal function and long-term patient/graft survival relative to individuals receiving calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression. However, the rates and severity of acute rejection (AR) are greater with the approved belatacept-based regimen than with CNI-based immunosuppression. Although these early co-stimulation blockade-resistant rejections are typically steroid sensitive, the higher rate of cellular AR has led many transplant centers to adopt immunosuppressive regimens that differ from the approved label. This article summarizes the available data on these alternative de novo belatacept-based maintenance regimens. Steroid-sparing, belatacept-based immunosuppression (following T cell–depleting induction therapy) has been shown to yield AR rates comparable to those seen with CNI-based regimens. Concomitant treatment with belatacept plus a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi; sirolimus or everolimus) has yielded AR rates ranging from 0 to 4%. Because the optimal induction agent and number of induction doses; blood levels of mTORi; and dose, duration, and use of corticosteroids have yet to be determined, larger prospective clinical trials are needed to establish the optimal alternative belatacept-based regimen for minimizing early cellular AR occurrence.     

Risk of malignancy with long-term immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Improvements in immunosuppressive regimens have significantly enhanced patient and graft survival in renal transplant recipients. However, susceptibility to neoplastic disorders is increased as a consequence of prolonged immunosuppression. Available data pertaining to cancer risks in renal transplant recipients have been inconsistent, and much of it is derived from international studies, which may not be truly representative of the United States population. METHODS: We studied a total of 1979 transplants performed in 1739 patients from a single center in the United States with a mean follow-up of 6.1 years, and a total of 9852 person-years' follow-up. RESULTS: The mean age at the time of diagnosis of cancer was 50 years, and the mean interval between transplant and diagnosis of cancer was 95 months. Older patients receiving a transplant had a significantly higher risk for developing cancer as opposed to younger patients (RR 6.2 for >60 years compared with <40 years). When compared with the general population using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry, the overall risk for nonskin malignancies was modestly increased in our transplant recipients, with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.4 (P= 0.01). When stratified by age groups, younger age at transplant (<40 years) had the highest SIR, at 2.3 (P < 0.001). Similarly, duration post-transplant >10 years had an SIR of 2.4 (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We believe that this study is representative of the United States' renal transplant population, and highlights the need for reduced immunosuppression in the long-term and increased vigilance for cancers in younger patients receiving renal transplantation.     

Sirolimus immunosuppression in pediatric heart transplant recipients: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus has been used in heart transplant recipients for treatment of rejection, alternative immunosuppression (IS) and promotion of regression and prevention of graft vasculopathy (coronary artery disease [CAD]). This study reports on our center's experience with 16 children who underwent heart transplantation. METHODS: Data were obtained by retrospective review. RESULTS: Median age at time of review was 12.3 years (n = 16, 5.1 to 18.0 years; 9 boys, 7 girls), and at time of transplant 7.5 years (6 months to 18.0 years). Median time of sirolimus introduction was 2.7 years (1 month to 8.2 years) post-transplant. Fifteen patients were on steroids, 10 on tacrolimus (FK) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), 5 on FK and 1 on MMF with no calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). The average dose of sirolimus was 0.25 mg/kg or 7.0 mg/m(2) to maintain a target level of 5 to 15 mug/liter. Sirolimus was started for CAD in 6 patients (38%), rejection in 5 (31%), and in 5 with combinations of CNI intolerance, CAD, renal dysfunction and rejection. All 6 who received sirolimus for rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT] Grade 3A) showed improvement on follow-up biopsies. Two of 3 who received sirolimus for renal dysfunction showed improvement (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 43 to 67 and 32 to 106 ml/min per 1.73 m(2), respectively). Side effects included hyperlipidemia (38%), abdominal pain (31%), mouth ulcers (26%), anemia or neutropenia (12.5%), persistent pericardial effusion (6%) and interstitial lung disease (6%). Sirolimus therapy was discontinued in 3 patients due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: In this study sirolimus was found to be a valuable IS agent for the management of rejection, significant renal dysfunction and CNI side effects. These results support the need for prospective studies of the role of sirolimus in primary rejection prophylaxis, primary CAD prophylaxis and CAD regression. There also exists a need to establish an adverse event profile for this drug.     

Induction versus noninduction in renal transplant recipients with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction treatment with antithymocyte globulins (ATG) followed by tacrolimus therapy with immediate tacrolimus therapy in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: This 12-month, open, prospective study was conducted in 15 centers in France and 1 center in Belgium; 309 patients were randomized to receive either induction therapy with ATG (n=151) followed by initiation of tacrolimus on day 9 or immediate tacrolimus-based triple therapy (n=158). In both study arms, the initial daily tacrolimus dose was 0.2 mg/kg. Steroid boluses were given in the first 2 days and tapered thereafter from 20 mg/day to 5 mg/day. Azathioprine was administered at 1-2 mg/kg per day. RESULTS: At month 12, biopsy-confirmed acute rejections were reported for 15.2% (induction) and 30.4% (noninduction) of patients (P=0.001). The incidence of steroid-sensitive acute rejections was 7.9% (induction) and 22.2% (noninduction)(P=0.001). Steroid-resistant acute rejections were reported for 8.6% (induction) and 8.9% (noninduction) of patients. A total of nine patients died. Patient survival and graft survival at month 12 was similar in both treatment groups (97.4% vs. 96.8% and 92.1% vs. 91.1%, respectively). Statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events were found for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (induction, 32.5% vs. noninduction, 19.0%, P=0.009), leukopenia (37.3% vs. 9.5%, P<0.001), fever (25.2% vs. 10.1%, P=0.001), herpes simplex (17.9% vs. 5.7%, P=0.001), and thrombocytopenia (11.3% vs. 3.2%, P=0.007). In the induction group, serum sickness was observed in 10.6% of patients. The incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus was 3.4% (induction) and 4.5% (noninduction). CONCLUSION: Low incidences of acute rejection were found in both treatment arms. Induction treatment with ATG has the advantage of a lower incidence of acute rejection, but it significantly increases adverse events, particularly CMV infection.