Effects of anti‐TNF‐α agents on circulating endothelial‐derived and platelet‐derived microparticles in psoriasis

Psoriasis involves TNF‐α secretion leading to release of microparticles into the bloodstream. We investigated the effect of TNF blockers on microparticles levels before and after treatment in patients (twenty treated by anti‐TNF‐α agents and 6 by methotrexate) with severe psoriasis. Plasmatic microparticles were labelled using fluorescent monoclonal antibodies and were analysed using cytometry. Three months later, 70% of patients treated with anti‐TNF‐α agents achieved a reduction in PASI score of at least 75%. The clinical improvement in patients treated with anti‐TNF‐α agents was associated with a significant reduction of the mean number of platelet microparticles (2837/μl vs 1849/μl, P = 0.02) and of endothelial microparticles (64/μl vs 22/μl, P = 0.001). Microparticles are significantly decreased in psoriatic patients successfully treated by anti‐TNF‐α. Microparticles levels as circulating endothelial cells represent signs of endothelial dysfunction and are elevated in psoriasis. Then, TNF blockade may be effective to reduce cardiovascular risk through the reduction of circulating microparticles.     

Autoantibodies in psoriasis as predictors for loss of response and anti-infliximab antibody induction

Background Infliximab is successfully used to treat psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, some patients lose therapeutic response after several cycles. Antibodies to infliximab (infliximab‐Abs) are induced during treatment in a subgroup of patients and are thought to be associated with loss of response (LOR). Routine screening for infliximab‐Abs is expensive and not regularly performed. A reliable and affordable method for identifying patients who are at risk for LOR to infliximab is desirable. Objectives To analyse the development of antinuclear antibodies (ANA)/antidouble‐stranded DNA antibodies (anti‐dsDNA) over time in patients with psoriasis receiving infliximab. To analyse if there is an association between ANA titres/anti‐dsDNA concentrations, infliximab‐Ab status and LOR. Methods A retrospective data analysis of 29 patients with psoriasis receiving infliximab was carried out. ANA titres and anti‐dsDNA concentrations were regularly monitored in these patients and sera were tested for infliximab‐Abs by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Results Median ANA titres increased from 1 : 80 [interquartile range (IQR) 0 to 1 : 320, n = 29] pretreatment, to 1 : 1280 (IQR 1 : 640 to 1 : 1920, n = 15) after infusion 10, and 1 : 1920 (IQR 1 : 1280 to 1 : 2560, n = 10) after infusion 20. Infliximab‐Abs were found in 21% of patients. Infliximab‐Ab‐positive patients and patients with LOR had significantly higher pretreatment anti‐dsDNA concentrations and higher pretreatment ANA titres than infliximab‐Ab‐negative and responsive patients, respectively. Conclusions The results of this study suggest a role for autoantibodies in the identification of patients with psoriasis at higher risk of developing infliximab‐Abs and of LOR under treatment with infliximab.     

Secondary failure of TNF‐α inhibitors in clinical practice

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) is a leading inflammatory cytokine that plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. In case of a severe course of psoriasis and moderate‐to‐severe disease in which traditional systemic treatments are ineffective or contraindicated, TNF‐α inhibitors (iTNF‐α) are used. This class of drugs includes monoclonal antibodies and a fusion protein (etanercept) and can induce a humoral or cell‐mediated immune response, leading to formation of anti‐drug antibodies (ADAs). The immunogenicity may affect iTNF‐α drug pharmacokinetics, which would lead to hampering the clinical response (secondary drug failure), so a need to increase the drug dose arises. Antibodies against monoclonal antibodies (adalimumab, infliximab) have been associated with diminished clinical response, while against etanercept are non‐neutralizing and appear to have no significant effect on clinical response and treatment safety. Switching of biologic agents may be one strategy in ADA‐associated secondary failure of iTNF‐α. However researches are needed to identify risk factors for ADA development and investigate management strategies for optimized treatment response. The authors reviewed the literature on the effectiveness of iTNF‐α and pointed out the prevention of secondary failure in clinical practice.     

银屑病患者抗肿瘤坏死因子α治疗前后血清抗核抗体、抗dsDNA抗体及抗ENA抗体的变化

目的：观察银屑病患者接受抗肿瘤坏死因子α制剂治疗后抗核抗体（ANA）、抗dsDNA抗体和抗可提取性核抗原（ENA）抗体的变化。方法回顾分析32例银屑病患者,其中13例使用英夫利西单抗治疗,19例使用依那西普治疗。英夫利西单抗组第0、2、6周各用药1次,此后每隔8周用药,于每次用药前检测患者ANA、抗dsDNA抗体及ENA的情况和临床症状的变化。依那西普组每周用药2次,每3~6个月检测患者ANA、抗dsDNA抗体及ENA的情况和临床症状的变化。采用银屑病皮损面积和严重度指数（PASI）75、疾病活动评分（DAS）28评估临床疗效,间接免疫荧光法检测血清ANA水平,免疫印迹法和ELISA法检测抗dsDNA抗体水平,免疫印迹法检测抗ENA抗体水平。结果32例银屑病患者临床症状有不同程度缓解。32例抗TNF?α治疗的患者中有7例（21.9%）出现自身抗体,其中英夫利西单抗组中4例治疗（8.3±5.1）个月后出现自身抗体,3例ANA阳性,3例ENA阳性;依那西普组中3例治疗（9.0±3.0）个月后出现自身抗体,3例ANA阳性,1例ENA阳性。结论部分银屑病患者接受抗肿瘤坏死因子α制剂治疗后可出现自身抗体。     

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab in psoriasis patients who failed ustekinumab and/or anti‐interleukin‐17 treatment: A real‐life 52‐week retrospective study

Recent major research advancements have significantly expanded our understanding of psoriasis pathophysiology, resulting in the development of highly effective, targeted therapies. Guselkumab is the first interleukin (IL)‐23 inhibitor approved for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe‐psoriasis, providing a new therapeutical option for psoriasis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in psoriatic patients who previously failed anti‐IL‐12/23 and/or anti‐IL‐17 treatment. A 52‐week single‐center retrospective study was performed enrolling moderate‐to‐severe patients attending our Psoriasis Care Center from October 2018 to May 2020. Study population included 13 patients; 46.1% have been previously treated with ustekinumab, while 69.2% have previously failed an anti‐IL‐17 treatment (38.5% secukinumab, 30.8% ixekizumab, and 38.5% both). At baseline, mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index was 13.2 ± 6.8, reducing up to 0.5 ± 0.7 at week 52 (P < .001). Body surface area reduced from 22.3 ± 10.5 (baseline) to 0.8 ± 1.1 at week 52 (P < .001). No statistically significant differences have been found between patients previously treated with anti‐IL‐12/23 compared to anti‐IL‐17 or both. Only one patient discontinued guselkumab at week 36 due to secondary inefficacy. This is a single institution study with a relatively small sample size. Our real‐life data confirm trial results, showing guselkumab as a safe and effective option in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis even in those who previously failed ustekinumab and/or anti‐IL‐17 treatment.     

Impact of anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α agents on serum levels of KL‐6 and surfactant protein‐D in patients with psoriasis

We longitudinally examined the influence of anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α treatment on serum levels of KL‐6 and surfactant protein‐D (SP‐D). The study group comprised 22 patients with psoriasis treated with infliximab or adalimumab and with no history of interstitial lung disease (ILD). KL‐6 and SP‐D levels were measured in serum samples. Twelve of the 22 patients (55%) showed at least a 20% increase in KL‐6 levels compared with baseline. Of these 12 patients, none exhibited any signs of ILD on chest computed tomography and nine who showed an increase in KL‐6 levels (75%) showed at least a 20% increase in SP‐D levels. Some patients showed simultaneous increases in KL‐6 and SP‐D levels after treatment with anti‐TNF‐α agents. Although these patients may have undetectable or subtle alveolar damage, careful observation is needed.     

Effectiveness of anti‐interleukin 23 biologic drugs in psoriasis patients who failed anti‐interleukin 17 regimens. A real‐life experience

Among the most recent biologic drugs available for psoriasis therapy, those targeting interleukin‐17 (secukinumab and ixekizumab) or its receptor (brodalumab) have been shown to be quickly effective. However, in those patients who failed one or more of the above‐cited drugs, real‐life data on the effectiveness of switching to one anti‐interleukin‐23 biologic (guselkumab, risankizumab, or tildrakizumab) are very scarce. Here, we report our experience in treating 12 multi‐failure psoriatic patients, prospectively followed‐up over 6 months, who showed a significant improvement in their psoriasis after switching from an anti‐interleukn‐17 to an anti‐interleukin‐23 drug.     

Adalimumab administration after infliximab therapy is a successful treatment strategy for generalized pustular psoriasis

We report a case of a 70‐year‐old woman with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) who responded well to infliximab therapy and adalimumab therapy after secondary failure of infliximab therapy, but did not respond to ustekinumab therapy. We speculate that the pathogenic factor in this case favored anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α therapy to anti‐interleukin‐12/23 therapy. Herein, we also briefly present three additional cases of treatment with adalimumab after secondary failure of infliximab. GPP is often difficult to treat, and no placebo‐controlled trials have been conducted to guide the use of biologics against it because of a paucity of cases. Infliximab and adalimumab are anti‐TNF‐α antibodies that specifically block the interaction of TNF‐α with its receptors. Infliximab has been reported to be effective, with a rapid clearance of symptoms, even in cases of severe GPP. Adalimumab could be a good biologic candidate that can be administrated after secondary failure of infliximab therapy.     

Combination therapy of cyclosporine and anti‐tumor necrosis factor α in psoriasis: a case series of 10 patients

Combination therapy has become important in treating psoriasis, using synergism between different mechanisms to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity. Little has been published on the combination of cyclosporine and anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents. In this study, a retrospective chart review was made of the effects of this combination therapy in 10 patients with recalcitrant psoriasis. Treatment included a conditioning phase with cyclosporine, 3.14 ± 0.37 mg/kg for 4.6 ± 2 weeks, and a combination phase during which etanercept/adalimumab were initiated and cyclosporine was tapered over 10.2 ± 3.7 weeks. Treatment success, evaluated after each phase, was classified as complete recovery (CR, more than 75% improvement), partial response (PR, 25–75% improvement), and no response (NR, less than 25% improvement). All patients reached CR at the end of the combination therapy. Two were still on combination therapy after 12 and 20 weeks. Adverse event occurred in three cases, all in the conditioning phase. We conclude that combination therapy with cyclosporine and anti‐TNF α appears to offer an effective and safe approach to treatment of psoriasis.     

Adalimumab‐induced scalp psoriasis with severe alopecia

In recent years, with the increase usage of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, more side effects have revealed. The incidence of paradoxical psoriasis (psoriasis vulgaris, palmoplantar pustulosis, scalp psoriasis, or their combinations) ranges from 1 to 5%; however alopecia due to anti‐TNF‐α‐induced scalp psoriasis, rarely reported in the literature. We report a 37‐year‐old woman who developed palmoplantar pustulosis and scalp psoriasis with severe alopecia after 2 months of treatment with adalimumab for chronic plaque psoriasis. Biopsies from the palmar and scalp lesions showed psoriasiform changes. Adalimumab treatment was discontinued, and methotrexate was started (15 mg/weekly, subcutaneously) with topical adjuvant agents. A dramatic improvement was seen in both the skin and scalp with complete hair regrowth in 1 month. We conclude that, in anti‐TNF‐α‐induced scalp psoriasis, suspension of anti‐TNF‐α agent and systemic and topical treatments should be considered to avoid scarring alopecia.     

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with psoriasis previously treated with anti‐tumour necrosis factor agents: subanalysis of BELIEVE

Background Few large clinical studies have evaluated whether switching tumour necrosis factor antagonists (anti‐TNFs) is likely to improve psoriasis in patients with prior anti‐TNF treatment. Objective The aim of this subanalysis of the BELIEVE study was to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab for psoriasis in patients with and without previous anti‐TNF treatment. Methods The BELIEVE study enrolled patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and prior failure, intolerance or contraindication to ≥2 systemic therapies. In this 16‐week, double‐blind, randomized, controlled trial, patients received adalimumab (80 mg, week 0; 40 mg every other week, weeks 1–15) with either topical vehicle or topical calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (C/B) applied once daily for 4 weeks, then as needed. The primary endpoint was ≥75% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) at week 16. This post hoc subanalysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of adalimumab, with and without topical therapy, in BELIEVE patients who had prior exposure to anti‐TNFs. Results Of 730 patients enrolled, 282 (38.6%) had prior anti‐TNFs and 448 (61.4%) were anti‐TNF‐naïve. Combining topical vehicle and topical C/B study populations, 61.7% of patients with prior anti‐TNFs achieved PASI 75 at week 16, compared with 71.7% of anti‐TNF‐naïve patients (P = 0.095). Adalimumab resulted in clinically meaningful improvement regardless of which prior anti‐TNF agent had been used, the number of prior anti‐TNFs tried, or reasons for discontinuation of prior anti‐TNF therapy. Adverse event incidences were similar between patients with and without prior anti‐TNF therapy. Conclusion Adalimumab was effective and well‐tolerated in patients with psoriasis previously treated with anti‐TNF therapy.     

Efficacy comparison of ustekinumab between anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α drug‐naïve and anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α drug‐resistant Japanese psoriasis cases

Ustekinumab is highly efficacious for psoriasis; however, it has not been fully clarified whether previous failure in anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) therapy affects the treatment response with ustekinumab. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab in anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve and anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases and compared the clinical efficacies of adalimumab and ustekinumab in biologic naïve cases. Thirty‐five patients with plaque psoriasis who showed resistance to conventional therapies were enrolled; 26 patients, who had never been treated with biologics, were allocated to ustekinumab or adalimumab; nine patients who failed to achieve psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) 50 at week 16 with one or two TNF‐α antagonists were switched to ustekinumab. The end of the study was defined as 52 weeks after starting the first biologic for anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve patients and after switching to ustekinumab for anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant patients. The primary outcome measurement was the percentage of patients achieving PASI75 at week 16. In patients treated with ustekinumab, 87.5% of anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve and 77.8% of anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases achieved a PASI75 response at week 16, and no statistically significant difference was found between the treatment response rates (P = 0.60). When comparing the treatment efficacy of ustekinumab and adalimumab among anti‐TNF‐α‐naïve patients, there was also no statistically significant difference in PASI75 achievement rates (87.5 vs. 83.3%, P = 0.79). Our study suggests that ustekinumab can be considered as a first‐line biologic for psoriasis and a rescue therapy for anti‐TNF‐α‐resistant cases.     

Severe infliximab‐induced psoriasis treated with adalimumab switching

Background Antitumor necrosis factor (anti‐TNF) agents are a well‐established treatment for various medical conditions, including psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, anti‐TNF agents may themselves induce psoriasis in some patients. Methods The authors report two cases of patients with severe and refractory infliximab‐induced psoriasis. Results The patients had good clinical responses after switching to another TNF blocker. Conclusion For severe cases, infliximab withdrawal combined with conventional immunosuppressive psoriasis drugs or with adalimumab may be a therapeutic option.     

Genetic prediction of the effectiveness of biologics for psoriasis treatment

Anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α therapy is used for the treatment of psoriasis, with varying outcomes. However, the specific cause of inadequate response or treatment failure remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to identify useful clinical biomarkers for predicting therapeutic responses or to serve as new drug targets for refractory psoriasis cases. We performed a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) of 65 psoriasis patients who were prospectively followed after beginning anti‐TNF‐α therapy using Human Omni Express‐8 v1.2 Beadchips. Patients were enrolled at the dermatology departments of Kobe University Hospital and six collaborative hospitals. Associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and changes in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) after 12 weeks of treatment were evaluated. After genome data collection and quality control, a total of 731 442 SNPs were identified in 65 Asian psoriasis patients who were treated with adalimumab or infliximab. Here, we present 10 SNPs, such as those in JAG2 and ADRA2A, that were associated with treatment responses to anti‐TNF‐α agents (strongest effect, P < 7.11E‐06). This is the first GWAS to examine SNP associated with treatment responses in psoriasis patients. In addition, we identified other SNP that exhibited potential associations with anti‐TNF‐α treatment response, which merit further study. Of these, rs11096957 on TLR10, which is associated with increased TNF‐α production, was previously reported to be associated with treatment responses to TNF‐α inhibitors.     

Safety of anti‐tumour necrosis factor‐α agents in psoriasis patients who were chronic hepatitis B carriers: a retrospective report of seven patients and brief review of the literature

Background Issues concerning the potential risks of reactivating chronic hepatitis B virus arise when the use of anti‐Tumour Necrosis Factor‐α (TNFα) agents is imperative in patients with concurrent psoriasis and hepatitis B virus infection. Objective The aim of this study was to report the experience regarding safety in the management of patients with coexisting psoriasis and chronic hepatitis B with the anti‐TNFα agents: infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab. Methods The psoriasis outpatient database of our dermatological department was searched for psoriasis and hepatitis B diagnoses and the medical records of these patients were reviewed for use of anti‐TNFα agents. Results Seven cases (four women and three men) were identified, with mean age of 51 years (34–65 years). Three patients received adalimumab, three patients were given etanercept and one infliximab. All patients received lamivudin, 100 mg/day, which started 2 weeks before the initiation of anti‐TNFα medication and went on during the whole treatment period. Follow‐up period extended from 6–24 months. All patients were inactive HbsAg (+) carriers. Liver function tests – at baseline and at the end of follow‐up period – were within the normal range. There was no considerable rise in the viral load in any case, from baseline until the last available measurement, although a patient receiving infliximab showed an increase that reached 600 IU/mL. Conclusion Successful treatment of psoriasis with anti‐TNFα agents in patients who are inactive HBsAg carriers is possible and could be safe under the conditions of concomitant lamivudin administration and intensive monitoring. Larger randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.     

TNF‐alpha‐Antagonisten in der Therapie der Psoriasis – Nutzen und Risiken

Summary: Anti‐TNF‐α agents including etanercept, a fusion protein of the p75 TNF receptor and IgG1 and infliximab, a chimeric human‐mowie monoclonal antibody. They have been approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and/or Crohn's disease. New understanding of the importance of the inlammatory cytokine TNF‐α in the pathophysiology of psoriasis led to the use in open‐label and randomized studies in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Although larger randomized trials are needed to confirm early results, both anti‐TNF‐α agents, have demonstrated activity in improving the signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. Further investigations will fully elucidate the role of infliximab in these and other dermatological diseases.     

Presence of anti‐phosphatidylserine–prothrombin complex antibodies and anti‐moesin antibodies in patients with polyarteritis nodosa

We measured both serum anti‐phosphatidylserine–prothrombin complex (anti‐PSPT) antibodies and anti‐moesin antibodies, as well as various cytokines (interleukin [IL]‐2, IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐10, IL‐13, IL‐17, granulocyte macrophage colony‐stimulating factor, γ‐interferon, tumor necrosis factor‐α) levels in polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) patients with cutaneous manifestations. All patients showed the presence of a histological necrotizing vasculitis in the skin specimen. They were treated with i.v. cyclophosphamide pulse therapy (IV‐CY) and prednisolone therapy or steroid pulse therapy. The immunological assessments were performed on sera collected prior to and after treatment with IV‐CY or steroid pulse therapy. We found a significant positive correlation between serum anti‐moesin antibodies and both clinical Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Scores and Vasculitis Damage Index. Anti‐PSPT antibody and IL‐2 levels after treatment in PAN patients were significantly lower than before treatment. In contrast, anti‐moesin antibody levels were higher following IV‐CY or steroid pulse therapy compared with the pretreatment levels. In the treatment‐resistant PAN patients (n = 8), anti‐PSPT antibody levels after treatment were significantly lower than before treatment. In contrast, anti‐moesin antibody levels after treatment in the patients were significantly higher compared with the pretreatment levels. Immunohistochemical staining revealed moesin overexpression in mainly fibrinoid necrosis of the affected arteries in the PAN patients. We suggest that measurement of serum anti‐PSPT antibody levels could serve as a marker for PAN and aid in earlier diagnosis of PAN. We also propose that elevated serum anti‐moesin antibodies could play some role of the exacerbation in patients with PAN.     

Presence of antidrug antibodies correlates inversely with the plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α level and the efficacy of TNF‐inhibitor therapy in psoriasis

Antidrug antibodies have been shown to be associated with a loss of response during biologic therapy. Despite the potential association, there has been no report on the simultaneous monitoring of the following parameters in psoriasis: presence of neutralizing antibodies, plasma tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α concentration, TNFi concentration and disease activity. Plasma concentrations of adalimumab, infliximab, etanercept and their respective antidrug antibodies, as well as plasma concentrations of TNF‐α were measured in 77 psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapy, and the values were correlated with the clinical activity of the skin disease. Antidrug antibodies were identified in the plasma of 25% of infliximab‐treated patients and 29.6% of adalimumab‐treated patients, but not in the etanercept group. Clinical severity scores were significantly higher in the antibody‐positive patients. In patients receiving infliximab or adalimumab therapy, the presence of antidrug antibodies was directly associated with reduced plasma TNF‐inhibitor concentration and elevated plasma TNF‐α level.     

Anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐alpha therapy improves endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: A 6‐month prospective study

The aim of the present study was to determine if the use of the anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α monoclonal antibody adalimumab could improve endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. This was a prospective study on a series of consecutive patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who completed 6 months of therapy with adalimumab. Patients with history of cardiovascular events, diabetes mellitus, kidney disease, hypertension or body mass index of 35 kg/m² or more were excluded. Assessment of endothelial function by brachial artery reactivity measuring flow‐mediated endothelial dependent vasodilatation (FMD%), and carotid arterial stiffness by pulse wave velocity (PWV) was performed at the onset of treatment (time 0) and at month 6. Twenty‐nine patients were studied. Anti‐TNF‐α adalimumab therapy yielded a significant improvement of endothelial function. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) FMD% values increased from 6.19 ± 2.44% at the onset of adalimumab to 7.46 ± 2.43% after 6 months of treatment with this biologic agent (P = 0.008). Likewise, following the use of adalimumab, PWV levels decreased from 6.28 ± 1.04 m/s at the onset of adalimumab to 5.69 ± 1.31 m/s at 6 months (P = 0.03). In conclusion, patients with moderate to severe psoriasis exhibit improvement of endothelial function and arterial stiffness following anti‐TNF‐α therapy. These findings are of potential relevance due to increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with severe psoriasis.     

Asymmetric dimethylarginine but not osteoprotegerin correlates with disease severity in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis undergoing anti‐tumor necrosis factor‐α therapy

Patients with psoriasis, in particular those with severe disease, have an increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) events compared with the general population. The aim of the present study is to determine whether correlation between asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and osteoprotegerin (OPG), two biomarkers associated with CV disease, and disease severity may exist in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. We also aimed to establish if baseline serum levels of these two biomarkers could correlate with the degree of change in the clinical parameters of disease severity following the use of anti‐tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α therapy in these patients. This was a prospective study on a series of consecutive non‐diabetic patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis who completed 6 months of therapy with anti‐TNF‐α‐adalimumab. Patients with kidney disease, hypertension or body mass index of 35 kg/m² or more were excluded. Metabolic and clinical evaluation was performed immediately prior to the onset of treatment and at month 6. Twenty‐nine patients were assessed. Unlike OPG, a significant positive correlation between ADMA and resistin serum levels was found at the onset of adalimumab and also after 6 months of biologic therapy. We also observed a positive correlation between the percent of body surface area affected (BSA) and ADMA levels obtained before the onset of adalimumab and a negative correlation between baseline ADMA levels and a 6‐month BSA change compared with baseline results. In patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis, ADMA levels correlate with clinical markers of disease severity.