Complications of androgen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is indicated for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer and locally advanced disease. In addition to sexual side effects, long-term ADT results in several other changes, including hot flashes; gynecomastia; changes in body composition, metabolism, and the cardiovascular system; osteoporosis; anemia; psychiatric and cognitive problems; and fatigue and diminished quality of life. This review discusses these complications of ADT and treatments aimed at reducing them. It is important for clinicians to anticipate these effects and to initiate measures to prevent or minimize them in order to maintain quality of life in prostate cancer survivors.     

Adding abiraterone to androgen deprivation therapy in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThere is a need to synthesise the results of numerous randomised controlled trials evaluating the addition of therapies to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). This systematic review aims to assess the effects of adding abiraterone acetate plus prednisone/prednisolone (AAP) to ADT.MethodsUsing our framework for adaptive meta-analysis (FAME), we started the review process before trials had been reported and worked collaboratively with trial investigators to anticipate when eligible trial results would emerge. Thus, we could determine the earliest opportunity for reliable meta-analysis and take account of unavailable trials in interpreting results. We searched multiple sources for trials comparing AAP plus ADT versus ADT in men with mHSPC. We obtained results for the primary outcome of overall survival (OS), secondary outcomes of clinical/radiological progression-free survival (PFS) and grade III–IV and grade V toxicity direct from trial teams. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the effects of AAP plus ADT on OS and PFS, Peto Odds Ratios (Peto ORs) for the effects on acute toxicity and interaction HRs for the effects on OS by patient subgroups were combined across trials using fixed-effect meta-analysis.FindingsWe identified three eligible trials, one of which was still recruiting (PEACE-1 (NCT01957436)). Results from the two remaining trials (LATITUDE (NCT01715285) and STAMPEDE (NCT00268476)), representing 82% of all men randomised to AAP plus ADT versus ADT (without docetaxel in either arm), showed a highly significant 38% reduction in the risk of death with AAP plus ADT (HR = 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53–0.71, p = 0.55 × 10⁻¹⁰), that translates into a 14% absolute improvement in 3-year OS. Despite differences in PFS definitions across trials, we also observed a consistent and highly significant 55% reduction in the risk of clinical/radiological PFS (HR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.40–0.51, p = 0.66 × 10⁻³⁶) with the addition of AAP, that translates to a 28% absolute improvement at 3 years. There was no evidence of a difference in the OS benefit by Gleason sum score, performance status or nodal status, but the size of the benefit may vary by age. There were more grade III–IV acute cardiac, vascular and hepatic toxicities with AAP plus ADT but no excess of other toxicities or death.InterpretationAdding AAP to ADT is a clinically effective treatment option for men with mHSPC, offering an alternative to docetaxel for men who are starting treatment for the first time. Future research will need to address which of these two agents or whether their combination is most effective, and for whom.     

Osteoporosis and other adverse body composition changes during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Osteoporosis and other body composition changes are important complications of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer. Bilateral orchiectomy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment decrease bone mineral density and increase fracture risk. Other factors including diet and lifestyle may contribute to bone loss in men with prostate cancer. Estrogens play an important role in male bone metabolism. Androgen deprivation therapy with estrogens probably causes less bone loss than bilateral orchiectomy or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Bicalutamide monotherapy increases serum estrogen levels and may also spare bone. Lifestyle modification including smoking cessation, moderation of alcohol use, and regular weight bearing exercise are recommended to decrease treatment-related bone loss. Supplemental calcium and vitamin D are also recommended. Pamidronate (Aredia®), an intravenous bisphosphonate, prevents bone loss during ADT. Other bisphosphonates are probably effective but have not been studied in hypogonadal men. Androgen deprivation therapy increases fat mass and decreases muscle mass. These body composition changes may contribute to treatment-related decreases in physical capacity and quality of life.     

Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on depressive symptoms in men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

Up to 50% of prostate cancer (PC) patients receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), often for several years. Although depression has been reported after a diagnosis of PC, whether ADT leads to or worsens depression is not clear.

METHODS:

Three groups were assembled: ADT users (men initiating continuous ADT), PC controls (PC patients who were not on ADT), and healthy controls. All 3 cohorts were matched on age, education, and physical function, and none had metastases. Depression was measured at study entry and again at 3, 6, and 12 months using the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Our primary outcomes were worsening depressive symptoms and incident depression (defined as a GDS score ≥5), analyzed using adjusted linear regression and logistic regression, respectively.

RESULTS:

Of the 257 participants (mean age, 69.1 years), baseline characteristics including GDS score and prior depression were similar across cohorts. In adjusted analyses of initially nondepressed patients, ADT use was not a significant predictor of change in GDS score at 3 months (P = .42), 6 months (P = .25), or 12 months (P = 0.19). Among ADT users, 8%‐9% of participants developed incident depression compared with 0%‐4% among PC controls and 4%‐6% among healthy controls over 3‐12 months (P>.05 at all time points). In a separate analysis of patients with depression at baseline, there was no effect of ADT on depressive symptoms at 3, 6, or 12 months (P = .11, .74, and .12, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Twelve months of ADT use were not associated with worsening depressive symptoms among nondepressed or depressed patients with nonmetastatic PC. Cancer 2012;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Clinically relevant fatigue in men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer on long-term androgen deprivation therapy

BackgroundThe purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and associations of clinically relevant fatigue (CRF) in men with biochemically controlled prostate cancer on long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).Patients and methodsOne hundred and ninety-eight men were surveyed and the prevalence of CRF (Brief Fatigue Inventory score >3) determined. Associations with other measures (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; International Prostate Symptom Score; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire; Brief Pain Inventory worst pain; clinical and demographic information) were explored in univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsEight-one per cent (160 of 198) of questionnaires were analysable. CRF prevalence was 43% (68 of 160). CRF associations included moderate/severe urinary symptoms, anxiety and medical co-morbidities; the strongest associations were depression [odds ratio (OR) 9.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3–22.8] and pain (OR 9.2, 95% CI 4.0–21.5). After controlling for other factors, the independent associations were depression (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.6–14.0) and pain (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.0–8.9). There was no association with age, disease burden or treatment duration.ConclusionsTwo-fifths of men with biochemically controlled prostate cancer on long-term ADT report CRF that interferes with function. Management aimed at improving CRF should address depression and pain.     

Bone mineral density in Jamaican men on androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Background

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been reported to reduce the bone mineral density (BMD) in men with prostate cancer (CaP). However, Afro-Caribbeans are under-represented in most studies. The aim was to determine the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on the bone mineral density (BMD) of men with prostate cancer in Jamaica.

Methods

The study consisted of 346 Jamaican men, over 40 years of age: 133 ADT treated CaP cases (group 1), 43 hormone-naïve CaP controls (group 2) and 170 hormone naïve controls without CaP (group 3). Exclusion criteria included metastatic disease, bisphosphonate therapy or metabolic disease affecting BMD. BMD was measured with a calcaneal ultrasound and expressed in S.D. units relative to young adult men (T score), according to the World Health Organization definition. Patient weight, height and BMI were assessed.

Results

Mean ± sd, age of patients in group 1 (75± 7.4 yrs) was significantly greater than groups 2 and 3 (67 ± 8.1 yrs; 65±12.0 yrs). There was no significant difference in weight and BMI between the 3 groups. . The types of ADT (% of cases, median duration in months with IQR) included LHRH (Luteinizing hormone releasing hormone) analogues (28.6%, 17.9, IQR 20.4), oestrogens (9.8%, 60.5, IQR 45.6) anti-androgens (11.3%, 3.3, IQR 15.2) and orchiectomy (15.7%, 43.4, IQR 63.9). Unadjusted t score of group 1, mean ± sd, (-1.6± 1.5) was significantly less than group 2 (-0.9±1.1) and group 3 (-0.7±1.4), p <0.001. Ninety three (69.9%), 20 (45%) and 75 (42%) of patients in groups 1, 2 and 3 respectively were classified as either osteopenic or osteoporotic (p<0.001). Adjusting for age, there was a significant difference in t scores between groups 1 and 2 as well as between groups 1 and 3 (p<0.001). Compared with oestrogen therapy and adjusting for duration of therapy, the odds of low bone mineral density (osteopenia or osteoporosis) with LHRH analogue was 4.5 (95%CI, 14.3 to 3.4); with anti-androgens was 5.9 (95%CI, 32.7 to 5); with orchiectomy was 7.3 (95%CI, 30 to 5.8) and multiple drugs was 9.2 ((95%CI, 31 to 7.1).

Conclusions

ADT is associated with lower BMD in Jamaican men on hormonal therapy for prostate cancer.

     

Resistance exercise in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Androgen deprivation therapy is a common treatment in men with prostate cancer that may cause fatigue, functional decline, increased body fatness, and loss of lean body tissue. These physical changes can negatively affect health-related quality of life. Resistance exercise may help to counter some of these side effects by reducing fatigue, elevating mood, building muscle mass, and reducing body fat. METHODS: In a two-site study, 155 men with prostate cancer who were scheduled to receive androgen deprivation therapy for at least 3 months after recruitment were randomly assigned to an intervention group that participated in a resistance exercise program three times per week for 12 weeks (82 men) or to a waiting list control group (73 men). The primary outcomes were fatigue and disease-specific quality of life as assessed by self-reported questionnaires after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were muscular fitness and body composition. RESULTS: Men assigned to resistance exercise had less interference from fatigue on activities of daily living (P =.002) and higher quality of life (P =.001) than men in the control group. Men in the intervention group demonstrated higher levels of upper body (P =.009) and lower body (P <.001) muscular fitness than men in the control group. The 12-week resistance exercise intervention did not improve body composition as measured by changes in body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, or subcutaneous skinfolds. CONCLUSION: Resistance exercise reduces fatigue and improves quality of life and muscular fitness in men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy. This form of exercise can be an important component of supportive care for these patients.     

Depression in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a pilot study

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and one of the leading causes of cancer death in men internationally. Treatment for prostate cancer frequently includes androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Reports of depressive symptoms arising during ADT are emerging. This study examines the prevalence rates and risk factors associated with major depression in this population. METHOD: 45 men with prostate cancer receiving ADT at the MGH Cancer Center were surveyed for depression with the SCID for Axis I disorders for DSM-IV and the Beck Depression Inventory. RESULTS: Major depressive disorder was prevalent in 12.8% of the men with prostate cancer receiving ADT, eight times the national rate of depression in men, 32 times the rate in men over 65 years old. Major depression was not associated with worsening disease, medical response to ADT, receiving chemotherapy, or the type of ADT. Past history of depression was associated with current depression in this population (p<0.000). No first onset cases of depression occurred on ADT in this sample. CONCLUSION: This data suggests a significant rate of major depression in men with prostate cancer receiving ADT and that men with past histories of depression may be at particular risk for recurrence of their depression while undergoing this treatment.     

Intermittent androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer is associated with several complications, including loss of libido, hot flashes, night sweats, psychological stress, osteoporosis, anemia, fatigue, loss of muscle mass, glucose intolerance, and changes in lipid profile. The natural history of prostate cancer while on such therapy is the attainment of an incurable androgen-independent state. Early diagnosis by prostate-specific antigen screening, longer life expectancies, and a penchant for immediate therapy pose a problem where clinicians have to balance the potential benefits of early hormonal therapy with the risks of development of these metabolic and psychological complications. Intermittent androgen deprivation offers clinicians a prospect to improve quality of life in patients with prostate cancer by harmonizing the benefits of androgen ablation with a reduction in treatment-related side effects and expenditure. In this review we discuss the challenges and opportunities of this mode of therapy and shed light on some of the underlying molecular mechanisms.     

A comprehensive bone-health management approach for men with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy

For advanced and metastatic prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (adt) is the mainstay of treatment. Awareness of the potential bone-health complications consequent to adt use is increasing. Many studies have shown that prolonged adt leads to significant bone loss and increased fracture risk that negatively affect quality of life. Clinical practice guidelines for preserving bone health in men with prostate cancer on adt vary across Canada. This paper reviews recent studies on bone health in men with prostate cancer receiving adt and the current evidence regarding bone-health monitoring and management in reference to Canadian provincial guidelines. Based on this narrative review, we provide general bone-health management recommendations for men with prostate cancer receiving adt.     

Moderators of resistance-based exercise programs' effect on sarcopenia-related measures in men with prostate cancer previously or currently undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: An individual patient data meta-analysis

IntroductionOlder men with prostate cancer are commonly affected by reductions in lean mass and physical function following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Resistance-based exercise programs are critical to counteract the musculoskeletal toxicities derived from prostate cancer treatment and aging. However, there is significant variability in the effects of exercise interventions. Examining demographic and clinical moderators of exercise effects in this patient group can assist in identifying which subgroups of patients benefit most. Therefore, we examined the effects and moderators of resistance-based exercise programs on sarcopenia-related outcomes that included lean mass, skeletal muscle index, physical function, and muscle strength in older men with prostate cancer.Materials and MethodsData were retrieved from the Predicting OptimaL cAncer RehabIlitation and Supportive care (POLARIS) consortium. For the present study, we included data from trials that examined the effects of supervised resistance-based exercise interventions on lean mass outcomes, muscle strength, and physical function in patients with prostate cancer previously or currently treated with ADT. Linear mixed models were undertaken to analyse the effects of resistance-based exercise programs considering the clustering of patients within studies. Effects were evaluated by regressing the study group on the post-intervention value of the outcome adjusted for the baseline value, while potential moderators were examined by adding the moderator and its interaction term into the regression model.ResultsA total of 560 patients with prostate cancer (age: 69.5 ± 7.8 yrs.; body mass index: 28.6 ± 4.0 kg.m⁻²) previously or currently treated with ADT were included. Resistance-based exercise programs resulted in significant effects on whole-body and appendicular lean mass and the skeletal muscle index (P < 0.05), with improvements observed across different characteristics. Improvements were also observed in 400-m walk and 6-m backwards tandem walk (P < 0.05), with patients presenting with lower baseline levels deriving greater exercise effects on 400-m walk (−19.4 s, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −36.6 to −2.3) and 6-m backwards tandem walk tests (−3.0 s, 95% CI: −5.7 to −0.3). For relative muscle strength, significant exercise effects were observed, with greater effects in younger patients (0.35 kg.kg⁻¹, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.48).DiscussionResistance-based exercise programs effectively improve well-known markers of sarcopenia in men with prostate cancer, with specific subgroups of patients, such as those younger and presenting with lower baseline levels of physical function, deriving greater effects on muscle strength and physical function, respectively.     

Intravenous nutrient therapy eliminated androgen deprivation therapy-induced hot flashes in two men with prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly used for the treatment of prostate cancer. For many undergoing ADT, hot flashes can affect and significantly reduce quality of life. Traditional medications for hot flashes are limited by both clinical effectiveness and side effects. In two case reports, ADT-induced hot flashes quickly resolved after a short course of a specific intravenous combination of vitamins and minerals. This therapeutic approach may have potential for the treatment of ADT-induced hot flashes.     

Contribution of androgen deprivation therapy to elevated osteoclast activity in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Biochemical markers of both osteoblast and osteoclast activity are elevated in men with osteoblastic metastases from prostate cancer. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the mainstay of therapy for advanced prostate cancer, increases markers of osteoblast and osteoclast activity, even in the absence of bone metastases. Little is known about the relative contributions of ADT and skeletal metastases to elevated bone turnover in men with prostate cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: To evaluate the relative contributions of ADT and skeletal metastases to osteoblast and osteoclast activity, we performed a cross-sectional study in three groups of men with advanced prostate cancer: (a) hormone-na?ve men without bone metastases; (b) castrate men without bone metastases; and (c) castrate men with bone metastases. The primary study end points were serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), a marker of osteoblast activity, and N-telopeptide (NTX), a marker of osteoclast activity. RESULTS: Serum levels of both BSAP and NTX were significantly higher in groups of castrate men (groups 2 and 3) than in hormone-na?ve men (group 1; P < 0.01 for all comparisons). Among castrate men, serum BSAP was significantly higher in men with bone metastases than in men without bone metastases (P = 0.01). In contrast, serum levels of NTX were similar in groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: The unintended effects of ADT on the skeleton are sufficient to explain increased osteoclast activity in castrate men with bone metastases. These results may have important implications for the optimal timing and schedule of osteoclast-targeted therapy in men with advanced prostate cancer.