Evaluation of a confidential method of excluding blood donors exposed to human immunodeficiency virus

A confidential self-administered questionnaire was given to all donors prior to blood donation (n = 95,917). The questionnaire describes acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) high-risk groups and requires the donor to designate his blood for either laboratory purposes or for transfusion. Six-hundred and twenty-seven people (0.65%; 78% men) designated their blood for laboratory purposes. In addition to routine enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA) screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody, all units from the latter group of donors were tested by Western blot (WB) irrespective of the EIA result. An equal number of donor units was selected from those designating their blood for transfusion (age, sex and clinic matched) and these too were tested by WB irrespective of the EIA result. We found that donors designating their blood for laboratory purposes had a 10 times (vs transfusion-designated controls) to 100 times (vs general donor population) greater exposure to HIV. In the laboratory-designated group, an EIA negative donor was WB positive, yielding an estimated EIA false-negative rate of 16 per million. A confidential questionnaire, as described, is a valuable adjunct in ascertaining high-risk blood donors.     

Donor self-exclusion patterns and human immunodeficiency virus antibody test results over a twelve-month period

Donor behavior in completing a pre-donation confidential self-exclusion form, which identified blood donors at high-risk of AIDS exposure, was evaluated. The form was completed by all donors during a 12 month period beginning in September, 1985. 188,824 units of blood were collected from 123,608 donors. On the first donation occasion 901 donors (0.73%) laboratory (LAB) designated, 224 (0.18%) did not complete the form correctly, and the remaining 122,483 transfusion (TRAN) designated. A greater proportion of LAB donors were men, under the age of 30 and had not donated in the previous two years than TRAN designated donors. Confirmed reactive anti-HIV, Western blot positive (WB+) results were greater in LAB than TRAN donors (1.664% vs 0.014%) on the first donation occasion. There were 43,982 donors who returned to donate on at least one other occasion. Of these, 43,778 designated TRAN initially, and only 217 (0.49%) changed their designation to LAB on any subsequent donation event. In contrast, of the 204 donors who designated LAB initially, 134 (65.6%) changed to TRAN on at least one other occasion. A variety of designation combinations from LAB to TRAN and back to LAB occurred. Thus, donors who initially LAB designated were more likely to change their designation on at least one other occasion than those who initially designated for TRAN. Of two donors who became anti-HIV WB positive on the second donation, one of these LAB designated on both occasions, was negative for anti-HIV by enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA-) on the first donation but converted to EIA+, WB+ on the second.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Characteristics of elderly blood donors

The aging of our society will result in an increased demand for blood components, but it also has the potential to produce a large group of blood donors, the elderly. To study the effects of regular donation by older persons, a randomized, controlled trial is being conducted among 244 healthy, elderly volunteers. This report focuses on the efficacy of the recruiting efforts for that study and describes the resultant population in terms of their demographics, medical status, and donation safety. Of 325 potential subjects, 18 percent were disqualified and 7 percent refused entry into the study. After medical evaluation, only 2 persons were disqualified for conditions not detected by the usual blood services screening protocols. The resultant elderly donor population (n = 244) was well-educated, middle-income, and, for the most part, married. The group reported more past and present medical conditions, past surgical procedures, and current medications than would be expected in a younger donor group. Reactions to donation were infrequent and mild. With current screening and donation procedures, blood donation by the elderly appears to be safe and practical.     

Retention of "safe" blood donors. The Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND: There are obvious advantages to increasing donor retention. However, for reasons of blood safety, certain donors may, in fact, be more desirable to retain than others. “Safe” donors are defined as those who provided a blood donation that was negative on all laboratory screening tests and who subsequently reported no behavioral risks in response to an anonymous survey. This study identifies the most important factors affecting the intention of “safe” donors to provide another donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anonymous survey asking about donation history, sexual history, injecting drug use, and recent donation experience was mailed to 50,162 randomly selected allogeneic donors (including directed donors) who gave blood from April through July or from October through December 1993 at one of the five United States blood centers participating in the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Before mailing, questionnaires were coded to designate donors with nonreactive laboratory screening tests at their most recent donation. RESULTS: A total of 34,726 donors (69%) responded, with substantially higher response among repeat donors. According to reported intentions only, the vast majority of “safe” donors indicated a high likelihood of donating again within the next 12 months. Only 3.4 percent reported a low likelihood of donating again. A comparison of those likely to return and those unlikely to return reveals significant differences in demographics and in ratings of the donation experience. A higher proportion of those unlikely to return were first-time donors, minority-group donors, and donors with less education. The highest projected loss among “safe” donors was seen for those who gave a fair to poor assessment of their treatment by blood center staff or of their physical well-being during or after donating. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that efforts to improve donors' perceptions of their donation experience, as well as attention to the physical effects of blood donation, may aid in the retention of both repeat and first-time donors.     

Efficacy of preoperative donation of blood for autologous use in radical prostatectomy

To determine the amount of blood lost, the number of transfusions, and the effectiveness of preoperative autologous blood donation in radical prostatectomy, 163 patients' records from 1987 to 1991 were reviewed at four university hospitals and three community hospitals. Calculated red cell volume lost was 1003 +/− 535 mL (mean +/− SD), which corresponds to 44 +/− 18 percent (mean +/− SD) of total red cell volume. Preoperative donation of blood for autologous use reduced the rate of transfusion of allogeneic blood from 66 to 20 percent (p < 0.001). Of the patients who donated 1 to 2 units, 32 percent received allogeneic blood; 14 percent of those who donated 3 units received allogeneic blood. Donation of 4 units reduced the allogeneic transfusion rate to 11 percent. However, as the number of units donated increased (1-3 units), the units not transfused also increased (0-21%). Ninety-one (56%) of 163 patients donated fewer than 3 units. Autologous blood donation is effective in minimizing the transfusion of allogeneic blood to radical prostatectomy patients, but many patients do not donate enough blood (< 3 units). The donation of 3 units of blood for autologous use is recommended for patients who undergo radical prostatectomy.     

Attitudes towards blood donation and transfusion in Bamenda, Republic of Cameroon

Objectives: This study was conducted in Bamenda, Cameroon. The objectives of the study were to develop a theoretical framework to better understand local attitudes towards blood donation and transfusion, to identify factors that motivate and deter blood donation and to identify interventions to improve the supply of blood for transfusion at Bamenda Regional Hospital. Background: The supply of blood for transfusion in sub‐Saharan Africa is insufficient. Cameroon has no national blood service and the collection and screening of blood is the responsibility of individual hospitals. At Bamenda Regional Hospital patient relatives recruit replacement blood donors, who may or may not be family members, and shortages of blood and delays in transfusion are frequent. Materials and Methods: Qualitative research methods were used: direct observation, in‐depth interviews, focus group discussions and a simulation exercise. Participants were clinical and laboratory staff, patient relatives, blood donors, secondary school students and community members. Results: Attitudes towards blood donation and transfusion fit a transanctionalist framework of health decision making. Deterrents to blood donation are multiple and varied. Some form of compensation is often expected, even by family members, although the blood donation is still considered ‘voluntary’ by the donor. Conclusion: This study confirms that interventions to improve the blood supply must take into account local attitudes and conditions. In Bamenda, a variety of pragmatic approaches are required including education around specific biological misperceptions identified in the study and the retention of replacement donors as repeat donors. Issues around compensation for blood donation require further work.     

Safety and efficacy of preoperative donation of blood for autologous use by patients with end-stage heart or lung disease who are awaiting organ transplantation

Many patients are, perhaps inappropriately, denied the benefits of autologous blood transfusion, because they are thought to be too ill to donate blood safely. The safety and efficacy of autologous blood donation by selected patients with end-stage heart or lung disease who are awaiting organ transplantation were studied to determine if even these critically ill patients could be suitable candidates for autologous blood donation. Seventy-two adults awaiting heart or lung transplantation were evaluated for autologous blood donation in a hospital-based blood collection facility. Phlebotomy was performed if the patient met the required medical eligibility protocol, and if he or she consented to participate. Units of blood were separated into packed red cells and plasma and stored in a frozen state. Of 48 heart transplant candidates, 31 (65%) were each able to donate 1 to 8 units of blood. The median number of exposures to allogeneic components was 1 for patients who donated and 7 for nondonors (p = 0.0141). Among patients who donated, 54 percent required allogeneic components, as compared to 88 percent of nondonors (p = 0.0968). Of 24 lung transplant candidates, 15 (63%) made 1 to 6 donations each. The median number of exposures to allogeneic components was 0 for donors and 2 for nondonors (p = 0.1871), but only 45 percent of donors required allogeneic components, as compared to 100 percent of nondonors (p = 0.0418). No serious complications during or following phlebotomy were observed. It is concluded that autologous blood donation by patients with end-stage heart or lung disease may be safe.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Hemochromatosis probands as blood donors

BACKGROUND: There has been no estimate of the potential eligibility of hemochromatosis probands or patients as blood donors or the suitability for transfusion of their blood that was removed by therapeutic phlebotomy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: According to guidelines of the American Association of Blood Banks, a retrospective estimate of these factors in 211 adult white hemochromatosis probands diagnosed during routine medical care was performed. The findings were compared to those in volunteer white whole-blood donors. RESULTS: Before diagnosis of hemochromatosis, 49 probands had voluntarily donated 597 units of blood; 88 percent were donated by men. After diagnosis, 142 (67%) of 211 probands were potentially eligible. Data on each unit removed during iron-depletion therapy and during the first year of maintenance therapy (therapeutic phlebotomy) were available in 86 eligible probands. Of 1592 units, 1029 (65%) obtained during iron-depletion therapy in eligible probands were potentially suitable; 86 percent were from men. During maintenance therapy, 106 (88%) of 121 units from eligible probands were potentially suitable. In volunteer donors, 255,567 (94%) of 273,302 presenting donors were accepted. After testing and laboratory losses, 239,300 (94%) units were acceptable for transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with normal volunteers, hemochromatosis probands at diagnosis are less likely to be eligible as blood donors. The percentage of units obtained from patients during iron-depletion therapy that are suitable for transfusion is also lower, although the percentage increases during maintenance therapy.     

Limitations of the erythropoietic response to serial phlebotomy: implications for autologous blood donor programs

Autologous blood (AB) deposit before elective surgery is a widely endorsed and rapidly expanding transfusion practice that reduces homologous blood (HB) needs but does not minimize HB transfusion in donors who are unsuccessful in predonating the amount of AB requested by their surgeon. To study limitations of the erythropoietic response in AB donors we have conducted a prospective analysis of 72 consecutive adult AB donors scheduled for orthopedic surgery. The data in this report indicate that endogenous erythropoietin response is inadequate in at least 58% of AB donors who are successful in predonating the requested amount of AB and that AB donors with lower initial body iron reserves relative to the amount of blood requested have a greater risk of deferral; 15 of 45 female patients (33%) were unable to predonate the requested amount of AB. Lower circulating red cell volumes (reflecting anemia at first blood donation, smaller body size, or both) and/or lower storage iron pools are contributing factors in this population. This report also indicates that a significant number of AB units have red cell volumes below minimum standards for blood donation, which has important implications in a risk/benefit analysis of whether nontransfused AB units should be "crossed-over" for HB transfusion, and that future studies designed to maximize AB procurement should include an evaluation of recombinant erythropoietin therapy in AB programs and therapeutic alternatives to ferrous sulfate as iron supplementation in AB donors.     

陕西省宝鸡市286 109名献血者HIV抗体检测结果分析

目的 分析陕西省宝鸡地区无偿献血人群中艾滋病病毒(HIV)感染情况,分析发展趋势,关注临床用血安全。 方法 使用ELISA法对献血人群抗-HIV抗体进行检测,初筛阳性血液、确证真正感染情况。对检测结果及流行病情况进行分析。 结果 宝鸡地区献血者感染艾滋病呈逐年上升趋势,男性及流动人员感染者多,同性性传播占比重大,年龄以20~40岁为主。 结论 加强无偿献血和艾滋病防治知识的宣传,从低危人群中采集血液,加强街头体检人员的征询能力和技巧,宣传献血后回告和保密性弃血的作用提高回告率。     

Predonation screening of blood donors with rapid tests: implementation and efficacy of a novel approach to blood safety in resource-poor settings

BACKGROUND: In sub-Saharan Africa, the percentage of screened blood is limited to approximately 75 percent for human immunodeficiency virus antibodies (anti-HIV), 50 percent for hepatitis B surface antigen, and 19 percent for hepatitis C virus antibodies (anti-HCV), mainly because of costs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 2002 to 2003, candidate blood donors were screened before donation for HIV, HCV, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) serologic markers with rapid tests. The efficacy of this screening was assessed by nucleic acid testing (NAT) applied to pools of 10 plasma samples from donated units with a virus specific triplex assay. NAT-reactive pools were resolved by viral genome identification in individual plasma sample. Deferred candidate donors were referred to a donor-care program. RESULTS: A total of 9372 people were screened and 1534 (16.4%) were deferred. No HIV or HCV RNA-containing samples remained undetected by rapid tests unless a human testing error was involved. In contrast, 1.3 and 3.0 percent of HBV DNA-containing blood units were negative with rapid tests but were detected in individual donations with enzyme immunoassay and genomic amplification, respectively. Only half of these units were detectable in pools of 10 samples. One-third of deferred candidate donors attended the donor-care program and were informed and counseled. CONCLUSIONS: Predonation viral screening of blood donors is effective in high endemic areas, and the savings it generates may improve the safety and limit the cost of blood. Communication with deferred donors may contribute to public health. A new screening strategy associating serologic rapid test before donation and NAT on pools of 10 plasma samples after donation is proposed.     

Evaluation of a confidential method of excluding blood donors exposed to human immunodeficiency virus: studies on hepatitis and cytomegalovirus markers

A confidential self-administered questionnaire was given to all blood donors prior to donation (n = 95,917). The questionnaire describes groups at increased risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and requires the donor to designate his blood either for laboratory purposes or for transfusion. In a previous communication, we reported that donors in the former group had a much higher prevalence of antibody to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) than age, sex and clinic matched controls or a group of "miscellaneous" donors who did not fill out the form properly. In this communication, we report results of tests for other viral markers performed on the three designation groups, namely laboratory-designated, miscellaneous and controls. We found that the former two groups had a higher prevalence of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) and cytomegalovirus (anti-CMV) than controls, but there were no differences in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels among the groups. In addition, the laboratory-designated group had a higher prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) than the general donor population. These data indicate that a questionnaire designed to ascertain AIDS high-risk donors is valuable in excluding donors who may be carriers of other viruses as well.     

A survey of blood component use in a German university hospital

BACKGROUND: There are no recent studies on transfusion practice and blood use with regard to diagnoses of European recipients. We conducted a survey of blood component use, including packed red cells, fresh- frozen plasma, and platelets, in an acute-care university hospital in the Greater Nurnberg area. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey was carried out of blood component transfusion at a university hospital (Erlangen, Germany) between June 1994 and May 1996. Transfused units were listed by broad diagnostic categories formed from principal diagnoses of the recipients according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. RESULTS: Among 100,497 discharged patients, 6,590 patients who received transfusion (6.6%) are represented in this survey. Of 28,440 red cell units and 8,592 fresh- frozen plasma units, 72.4 percent and 66.9 percent, respectively, were used in patients with neoplastic diseases, circulatory system diseases, or disorders of the digestive system. Of 2704 platelet units, 78.1 percent were transfused to patients with neoplastic or gastrointestinal diseases or diseases of blood-forming organs. These four diagnostic categories accounted for 77.7 percent of all costs of transfusion therapy. Males received 60.1 percent of all blood components transfused, and patients less than 65 years old received 68.0 percent. CONCLUSION: This survey provides information on blood component usage in a German university hospital. It demonstrates the concentration of today's blood utilization among a few diagnostic categories. The study shows that detailed information on local blood use may be obtained quickly by using data available from transfusion services and medical record departments. This information is relevant for quality management of transfusion practice, cost analyses and for planning local and regional blood donation programs.     

Interviews of individuals diagnosed as anti-human immunodeficiency virus-positive through the screening of blood donations in the Paris area to 1994: reflections on the selection of blood donors

BACKGROUND: One of the aims of the medical interview routinely preceding each blood donation is the identification of individuals with a risk factor for infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). STUDY DESIGN and METHODS: Interviews were performed with individuals diagnosed as being seropositive for HIV through the systematic biologic screening of blood donations in the Paris area to establish, first, the circumstances allowing HIV-seropositive individuals to pass through the predonation medical interview and, second, the motivation of these individuals as blood donors. Risk factors of 30 HIV-infected donors identified between 1991 and 1994 were determined. RESULTS: When asked whether they recognized the eventual risk to recipients of donated blood, 14 (47%) of 30 answered positively. Fifteen (50%) admitted having given their blood to determine their HIV status. CONCLUSION: These individuals did not exclude themselves from blood donation and probably hid their risk factor(s) at the predonation interview in order to be accepted as blood donors.     

The effectiveness of the confidential unit exclusion option

BACKGROUND: The confidential unit exclusion (CUE) option is intended to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission by excluding donors newly infected with HIV who have not yet developed HIV antibody (window-period donors); however, its efficacy in excluding window- period donors has not been evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The use of the CUE option was studied among the donors of 3.7 million units at 18 American Red Cross blood services regions during 1991 and 1992 and among 322 previously HIV-1-seronegative donors who subsequently donated a seropositive unit between 1987 and 1990 at 40 United States blood centers. These seroconverting donors had previously been shown to be highly likely to donate during their window period. RESULTS: On the basis of data from these two populations, it was estimated that only 3 to 5 percent of units donated by window-period donors were not transfused because of the CUE option, that 0.4 percent of all donations were from donors who confidentially excluded their blood from transfusion, and that donors who confidentially excluded their blood were 21 times more likely to be HIV antibody-positive than donors who did not use the CUE option. It is estimated that, if all US blood centers used the CUE option, a total of 2 to 17 otherwise acceptable units donated by window-period donors would not be transfused annually. CONCLUSION: Although donors who confidentially exclude their blood from transfusion are 21 times more likely to have HIV antibody, the rarity of window-period donors and the infrequency of confidential exclusion by window-period donors cause the CUE option to have minimal impact on transfusion safety.     

Utilization and effectiveness of a hospital autologous preoperative blood donor program

The utilization and effectiveness of a hospital preoperative autologous blood donation program were analyzed. Over 16 months, 180 donors, or 11.6 percent of eligible patients (those undergoing elective surgical procedures where blood was routinely crossmatched), were enrolled in the program. They donated an average of 2.2 units of red cells, or 59 percent of the mean order of 3.7 units. Donations were completed in 17.9 days, leaving 10.7 days between the last donation and hospitalization. Of all scheduled donations, 25.5 percent were cancelled due to deferrals; 47.8 percent of patients were deferred at least once. Most patients were able to donate a unit of blood weekly, with minimal drops in hematocrit (mean 3.2%). The reaction rate, 4.8 percent, was comparable to figures reported for homologous donors. Nearly two-thirds of participants used no homologous blood during their hospitalization: 28.6 percent used no blood whatsoever, and 36.9 percent used only autologous components. Including released autologous components subsequently administered to other recipients, transfused autologous red cells were 2.1 percent and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) 7.2 percent of the hospital's blood supply. Although the high deferral rate complicated the administration of the program, this complication was offset by the demonstration of donor safety, reduction in the proportion of patients who used homologous blood, and the contribution of autologous blood components to the hospital's blood inventory.     

Retention of prospective donors: A survey about services at a blood donation centre

BackgroundIn times of shrinking donor population the recruitment and retention of donors is of utmost importance.AimsTo gain information about the donors’ satisfaction with services at the blood donation service, and their reasons for not returning.MethodsProspective donors were interviewed by telephone about their eligibility examination. The survey included questions that measured the setting of the examination, staff friendliness, reminder for the first donation and questioned why the donor did not present for donation.ResultsEighty-eight prospective donors were surveyed. Most donors made an appointment for the eligibility evaluation and were content with the timeliness of the appointment by the transfusion staff. There were good scores (<2) for staff friendliness (2.0), registration of personal data (1.9), laboratory examination (1.7), information about blood donation (1.7) and medical examination (1.9). Various reasons for not returning for the first donation were mentioned, medical reasons and no time were mentioned most often.ConclusionMost prospective donors were content with the services offered by our blood donation service. Retention is difficult because most donors did not return for the first donation due to medical deferral reasons.     

Heterosexually acquired human immunodeficiency virus infection and the United States blood supply: considerations for screening of potential blood donors. HIV Blood Donor Study Group

The impact of heterosexual transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) on the United States blood supply was assessed, and deferral criteria that may exclude potential donors who are at high risk for heterosexually acquired HIV infection were evaluated. Interviews were conducted with 508 HIV-seropositive blood donors from May 1, 1988, to August 31, 1989 (Phase 1), and with 472 donors from January 1, 1990, to May 31, 1991 (Phase 2), at 20 blood centers. From Phase 1 to Phase 2, the overall HIV prevalence decreased from 0.021 to 0.018 percent (p < 0.001). HIV risk factors among HIV-1-seropositive donors were similar during both study phases. Eleven percent of the men and 56 percent of the women reported as their only risk that they had a heterosexual partner who was at increased risk for HIV or was known to have HIV. These percentages were similar during both study periods. During Phase 2, 13 percent of the men and 17 percent of the women with heterosexual transmission risk had a positive serologic test for syphilis, hepatitis B core antibody, or hepatitis C antibody. Among HIV- 1-seropositive donors reporting heterosexual risk, the median numbers of previous-year and lifetime sex partners for men were 2 and 30, respectively; for women, those numbers were 1 and 7, respectively. Thirty-one percent of the men and 6 percent of the women reporting heterosexual transmission risk also reported having had syphilis or gonorrhea within 3 years of donation. It is concluded that the impact of heterosexual transmission of HIV infection on transfusion safety is not worsening at this time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Epidemiologic background and long-term course of disease in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected blood donors identified before routine laboratory screening. Transfusion Safety Study Group

BACKGROUND: The long-term course of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-related disease among seropositive blood donors has not been described. The enrollment and epidemiologic background of HIV-1- infected donors in the Transfusion Safety Study and their immunologic and clinical progression are described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Through the testing of approximately 200,000 sera from donations made in late 1984 and early 1985, 146 anti-HIV-1-positive donors and 151 uninfected matched donors were enrolled. These two cohorts were followed with 6-month interval histories and laboratory testing. RESULTS: Seropositive donors detected before the institution of routine anti-HIV-1 screening disproportionately were first-time donors and men with exclusively male sexual contacts. The actuarial probability of a person's developing AIDS within 7 years after donation was 40 percent; the probability of a person's dying of AIDS was 28 percent. AIDS developed more often when the donor was p24 antigen-positive at donation. Over a 3-year period, significant decreases occurred in CD4+, CD2+CD26+, CD4+CD29+, and CD20+CD21+ counts, but not in CD8+ subsets, CD20+, or CD14+. CONCLUSION: The high proportions of first-time donations and exclusively homosexual men among seropositive donors suggest that test-seeking may have contributed to the high HIV-1 prevalence in the repository. Implementation of alternative test sites when routine donor screening began in 1985 may have averted many high- risk donations. The disease course in HIV-1-infected donors had the same wide spectrum of immunologic and clinical manifestations as were reported for other cohorts.     

Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus through blood transfusion: the use of lookback and traceback approaches to optimize recipient identification in a regional population

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to define the epidemiologic features of the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by blood transfusion in a region of Canada between 1980 and 1985 and the results of intensive recipient-identification practices. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Lookback (notification of all recipients of blood from an HIV-infected donor) and traceback (identification of the HIV-infected source donor, after an HIV-infected recipient of blood cites transfusion as a risk for infection) programs were established linking (with patient consent) a transfusion service and an HIV clinic to identify HIV-infected donors and the recipients of their blood. RESULTS: Twenty-two cases of documented HIV infection and 26 cases of presumed infection were found in local blood recipients. Twenty-eight recipients have died of causes unrelated to HIV. Twelve recipients have developed AIDS. Six of the seven living recipients have yet to develop an AIDS condition. These 48 infections have been linked to 11 donors who have subsequently tested positive for HIV infection. Six donors were found on subsequent blood donation. Five donors were found by traceback. CONCLUSION: Forty-eight recipients of blood from donors who subsequently tested positive for HIV were identified in a low- prevalence area. Active lookback and traceback programs linking a transfusion service and an HIV clinic were successful in identifying infected recipients.