The risk of glaucoma and corneal thickness

Intraocular pressure is still the most important risk factor for the development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage. There is growing evidence that corneal thickness is a risk factor for the development of glaucoma. This might be caused by the effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements. Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements are correlated with corneal thickness. Thick corneas lead to false high readings whereas thin corneas lead to false low readings. If corneal thickness as a risk factor for glaucoma is only related to the dependency of IOP measurements on corneal thickness or is related to possible different biomechanical tissue properties in glaucomatous eyes is not known. However, a large proportion of the corneal thickness effect seems to be related to the effect on IOP readings by applanation tonometry. Neglecting corneal thickness can lead to false measurements of IOP with consequent misdiagnosis and false treatment. Therefore, measurements of corneal thickness should be performed in glaucoma patients and suspects.     

Pediatric intraocular pressure measurements: Tonometers,central corneal thickness,and anesthesia

Measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) is the cornerstone of a comprehensive glaucoma examination. In babies or small children, however, IOP measurements are problematic, cannot often be performed at the slit lamp, and sometimes require general anesthesia. Therefore, it is essential for an ophthalmologist who examines a pediatric patient to be aware of the different tonometers used in children, as well as the effects of central corneal thickness and anesthesia on IOP measurements. Goldmann applanation tonometry is the gold standard for IOP assessment. Most alternative tonometers tend to give higher IOP readings than the Goldmann applanation tonometer, and readings between different tonometers are often not interchangeable. Similar to Goldmann tonometry, many of these alternative tonometers are affected by central corneal thickness, with thicker corneas having artifactually high IOP readings and thinner corneas having artifactually lower IOP readings. Although various machines can be used to compensate for corneal factors (e.g., the dynamic contour tonometer and ocular response analyzer), it is important to be aware that certain ocular diseases can be associated with abnormal central corneal thickness values and that their IOP readings need to be interpreted accordingly. Because induction and anesthetics can affect IOP, office IOPs taken in awake patients are always the most accurate.     

Augeninnendruck und Hornhautdicke

OBJECTIVE: Corneal thickness and deformation seem to have a considerable influence on intraocular pressure measurement. Due to differences in the corneal deformation in either non-contact tonometry or applanation tonometry, both methods should be compared in the same patient group depending on central corneal thickness. METHODS: In 106 eyes of 55 patients (18 males, 37 females, age 17-89 years, mean 63.3 years) with glaucoma and central corneal thickness between 409 and 644 microm (Orbscan II pachymetry) intraocular pressure was measured in each eye with non-contact tonometry (Reichert AT550) and 30 min later with Goldman applanation tonometry. RESULT: Non-contact tonometry as well as applanation tonometry showed a positive correlation between measured intraocular pressure and corneal thickness. The steepness of the line of regression was 0.33 mmHg per 10 microm of corneal thickness in non-contact tonometry and 0.17 mmHg per 10 microm of corneal thickness in applanation tonometry. CONCLUSION: Independently of the large differences in individual pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and applanation tonometry, we found higher IOP values with non-contact tonometry in thicker corneas as compared with applanation tonometry. In thinner corneas there was a better correspondence between both methods. Thus, it seems very likely that corneal rigidity increases with corneal thickness.     

The role of pachymetry in routine glaucoma diagnosis

The influence of corneal thickness on the precision of Goldman applanation tonometry is highly disputed. Goldmann and Schmidt assumed that the physiological variation of corneal thickness does not influence the measurement. But they indicated that an "abnormal" deviation of corneal thickness can lead to a false measurement. In the last 30 years many investigations have reliably demonstrated that thick corneas produce elevated applanation values and thin corneas lower values. The correction value is 1 mm Hg per 25 microm change in corneal thickness. The accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement is important for the detection and monitoring of glaucoma. Therefore it is necessary to recalculate applanation values based on corneal thickness in every patient, especially after refractive surgery. It is also necessary to keep in mind that with applanation tonometry we measure a force. From the force readings we deduce the value of the intraocular pressure. This conclusion is only correct if the theory of Goldmann applanation tonometry is right. But between force measurement and intraocular pressure there is the individual cornea with special properties like thickness, rigidity and astigmatism which can influence the correctness of the measurement. So we can understand why knowledge of corneal thickness can improve the deduction from force measurement of intraocular pressure. It is also reasonable that other individual corneal properties we do not measure or do not know so far can influence the deduction. This means that the corneal thickness is not the only variable. Pachymetry allows us to estimate the intraocular pressure with higher precision. Therefore it should be clinically used.     

The corneal thickness and intraocular pressure story: where are we now?

A review of the current literature was conducted regarding the effect of corneal thickness on the diagnosis of glaucoma, and the influence of excimer laser refractive surgery on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with Goldmann applanation tonometry. In general, normals and primary open angle glaucoma patients have a similar distribution of corneal thickness; however, there is a wide variation, ranging from 427 to 716 micro m. Normal tension glaucoma patients have a tendency towards thinner corneas than normals; however, there is an overlap of thickness measurements of more than two-thirds in 95% of patients. There is a trend for ocular hypertensives to have thicker corneas than normals, but again there is an overlap of about one-third in 95% of patients. The general trend after excimer laser refractive surgery is for a decrease in IOP, with a mean fall in IOP measured of 0.63 mmHg per dioptre correction. There is, however, a large scatter of values with some patients having the same or lower IOP post-laser, but with other patients measuring higher pressures. Corneal thickness can influence IOP measurement by Goldmann applanation tonometry; however, the magnitude of the effect is subject to much individual variation.     

The effect of central corneal thickness on tonometry

Central corneal thickness (CCT) affects IOP measurements and is an independent risk factor for the development of glaucoma. IOP measurements of all common tonometers, such as the Goldmann applanation tonometer, non-contact tonometer and rebound tonometer, are affected by CCT. Nomograms to correct IOP measurements according to CCT have been established. These nomograms lead to a reduction of the measurement error caused by CCT in groups of patients. However, one has to be aware of the fact that, in individuals, the correction of IOP measurements can even increase the deviation of the IOP measurement from the actual IOP. The effect of CCT on dynamic contour tonometry and IOP (cc) measured by ORA is negligible. CCT is an important parameter in glaucoma management and needs to be considered when interpreting IOP measurements. This can be done by using nomograms or by implementing CCT in the calculation of the individual target pressure.     

Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability of intraocular pressure measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry versus pneumotonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, corneal Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry measurements were made in 118 eyes of 60 patients before and 1 and 3 months after undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Manifest refraction, ultrasonic corneal thickness measurements, and keratometry readings were also obtained. RESULTS: Preoperative intraocular pressure showed a good correlation between Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry values (Pearson r = 0.71; P < 0.001). although Goldmann applanation tonometry readings were slightly higher at low intraocular pressure values and slightly lower at high intraocular pressure values. After a mean stromal ablation depth of 77.1 microm, mean intraocular pressure by Goldmann applanation tonometry decreased significantly (P < 0.001) from a preoperative value of 14.8 +/- 11.9 mm Hg to 11.9 +/- 2.1 mm Hg and 11.7 +/- 1.7 mm Hg after 1 and 3 months, respectively. Mean pre- and post-laser in situ keratomileusis measurements by pneumotonometry were similar (P = 0.8). Differences of postoperative intraocular pressure measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry were statistically significant. After 3 months, there was a poor correlation between Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry intraocular pressure values (Pearson r = 0.58). Postoperative intraocular pressure decrease in applanation tonometry correlated with changes in keratometry, spherical equivalent, and central corneal thickness. Regression analysis showed a decrease of 2.9 mm Hg per 70 microm reduction in central corneal thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Contact pneumotonometry measures the IOP reliably after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia, whereas Goldmann applanation tonometry underestimates the intraocular pressure. This may be important in the treatment of any future glaucoma.     

Undetected development of glaucoma after radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To report a case of advanced glaucomatous optic atrophy years after bilateral radial keratotomy. METHODS: Multiple intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements of both eyes in a 40-year-old woman who underwent previous bilateral radial keratotomy were obtained using Goldmann applanation tonometry as well as air-puff and Schiotz tonometry. In addition to regular eye examinations, corneal thickness, surface, and shape were examined using Orbscan and C-Scan. RESULTS: The cornea of both eyes did not show signs of corneal thinning, but flattening of the corneal surface was observed. The decreased corneal curvatures precipitated a misjudgment of IOP readings measured by central applanantion tonometry (12 to 18 mmHg), whereas impression and non-contact tonometry revealed elevated IOP values (21 to 27 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Changes of the corneal shape without corneal thinning can lead to falsely low IOP values. Therefore, in eyes that have undergone corneal refractive surgery, non-Goldmann measurement of IOP and continued examination of the optic nerve and possibly visual fields are recommended.     

Central corneal thickness measurements in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent studies have revealed patients with ocular hypertension to have thicker than normal central corneas and those with normal tension glaucoma to have thinner than normal ones, as determined by ultrasonic pachymetry. Since corneal thickness measurements and applanation tonometric estimates of intraocular pressure (IOP) correlate positively, monitoring of the former parameter have served as the basis for adjusting readings pertaining to the latter, with the consequence that many patients have had to be reclassified. With a view to validating these pachymetric studies, the central corneal thickness was determined in patients with normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, or ocular hypertension, as well as that of normal subjects, using optical low coherence reflectometry, which is a new and more precise method than ultrasonic pachymetry. METHODS: 34 patients with normal tension glaucoma, 20 with primary open angle glaucoma, 13 with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, and 12 with ocular hypertension, together with 21 control subjects, were included in this observational, concurrent case-control study. One eye per individual was randomly selected for investigation. IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness by optical low coherence reflectometry. RESULTS: Central corneal thickness was significantly higher (p < or =0.001) in patients with ocular hypertension than in normal individuals or in subjects with either normal tension glaucoma, primary open angle glaucoma, or pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, there being no significant differences between the latter four groups. Patients with ocular hypertension were also significantly younger (p < or =0.003) than those within any of the three glaucomatous groups. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that a significant number of patients with ocular hypertension have normal IOPs after the appropriate adjustments have been made for deviations from normal in their central corneal thickness. The accurate measurement of this latter parameter is important not only for individual patient care, in permitting more precise estimations of IOP, but also for clinical studies, in assuring a more reliable classification of subjects.     

Relation between corneal thickness and intraocular pressure measurement by noncontact and applanation tonometry.

PURPOSE: To assess whether there is a significant difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements between noncontact and applanation methods and if so, whether the difference is correlated with corneal thickness. SETTING: I?ik Eye Clinic, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 120 eyes of 60 randomly selected patients. Noncontact tonometry, applanation tonometry, and pachymetry were performed in each eye. The results were compared and an analysis was performed to determine whether there was a correlation between the differences in IOP measurements and corneal thickness in the entire group and in subgroups composed of the halves and quarters of the group. RESULTS: The mean IOP in the entire group was 20.38 mm Hg +/- 4.97 (SD) with the noncontact tonometer and 18.84 +/- 4.47 mm Hg with the Goldmann applanation tonometer. The difference between the measurements with the noncontact method and those with the applanation method was statistically significant (P <.01) except in cases having a corneal thickness between 513 microm and 539 microm (P >.01). There was a positive correlation between corneal thickness and the difference in measurements by noncontact and applanation tonometry, and the magnitude of correlation was greater in cases with thicker corneas. CONCLUSION: The reliability of tonometers decreased with increasing corneal thickness, in which case higher readings were found, especially with the noncontact tonometer.     

Changes in corneal thickness and curvature after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their impact on intraocular pressure measurements

Background Excimer laser refractive surgery alters the shape and thickness of the cornea by removing central corneal tissue with submicrometer precision. The aim of the study was to analyze the changes in central corneal thickness (CCT) and curvature before and after different excimer laser photorefractive procedures and their possible impact on intraocular pressure (IOP) estimations with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Methods Data on CCT, corneal curvature and IOP readings with Goldmann applanation tonometry before and after excimer laser photorefractive surgery were analyzed retrospectively. The data was further analyzed separately in two subgroups; the photorefractive keratectomy /laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (PRK/LASEK) group and the laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) group. Results The overall post-operative IOP readings were significantly lower than pre-operative values. There was a significant difference in the lowering of the IOP readings between the two subgroups: LASIK caused a lower IOP reading than PRK/LASEK. Conclusion The change in corneal thickness and curvature affects the estimation of IOP with Goldmann applanation tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive surgery. The amount of reduction in IOP reading might be influenced by the specific laser surgical procedure. This is of clinical importance in the evaluation of any future glaucoma in the increasing number of patients who undergo photorefractive laser surgery.     

Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and their relationship to corneal properties,refractive error,and ocular pulse amplitude

BackgroundAccurate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is essential in diagnosing and managing glaucoma. Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) is less dependent on corneal properties, such as thickness, elasticity, and rigidity, than Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). This study examined the relationship between GAT and DCT as well as their relationship with corneal properties and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA).MethodsGAT, DCT, OPA, pachymetry, refractive error, and corneal curvature measurements were obtained on 115 healthy volunteers.ResultsParticipants with thicker corneas (≥580 μm) had higher IOP measurements with GAT than DCT (P = 0.005). Those with thinner corneas (≤520 μm) had lower IOP with GAT versus DCT (P = 0.008). GAT and DCT readings did not differ significantly in corneas with average thickness (521 to 579 μm). A clinically significant IOP difference between DCT and GAT was found in 18.2% of subjects. A correlation was found between OPA and both refractive error and IOP (R² = .343, P < 0.0001). OPA was higher with increased IOP and decreased myopia.ConclusionDCT provides IOP measurements that are less dependent on corneal factors than GAT, aiding in diagnosis and treatment of patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Additional studies are necessary to examine the relationship between OPA, refractive error, and IOP and its possible association with increased incidence of glaucoma in myopic patients.     

Use of corneal pachymetry in ocular hypertension and chronic glaucoma

Among the numerous corneal variables that may influence the determination of the "true" intraocular pressure (IOP) from applanation tonometry measurements and considering the still non conclusive scientific data on all the different aspects of this topic, the measurement of the central corneal thickness (CCT) may be an interesting diagnosis tool in hypertensive and glaucomatous patients. As far as the physiologic variability of the corneal thickness is considered, the measurement of CCT can potentially become an important confounding variable when measuring applanation tonometry in patients with ocular hypertension. It could also improve the management of patients with normal tension glaucoma and patients with suspicious optic discs. In these three groups, the measurement of CCT may be useful in determining if there is an artefactual error in the IOP measurement due to a thicker (too high) cornea or thinner (too low) cornea. Therefore the IOP corrected by CCT may change or influence a decision to initiate or modify treatment. CCT measurement has also proved to be crucial in patients who have undergone laser refractive surgery.     

Poor utility of intraocular pressure correction formulae in individual glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients

Background: To compare Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) measurements with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) readings after adjustment with correction formulae in a population of Caucasian glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients. Design: Retrospective cross‐sectional case series in a specialist glaucoma practice. Participants: Consecutive glaucoma and glaucoma suspect Caucasian patients. Methods: Case notes review of the GAT and DCT intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements from patients who presented on a non‐acute basis over a 30‐month period. The GAT measurement was adjusted with six different correction formulae. Agreement between GAT IOP, adjusted GAT IOP and DCT IOP was evaluated with the Bland‐Altman analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Agreement between GAT IOP (both unadjusted and adjusted) and DCT IOP. Results: Data from 200 patients with a mean age of 58.4 (±12.7) years were analysed. The mean central corneal thickness was 554.8 (±36.9) µm and the mean corneal hysteresis was 9.8 (±1.9) mm Hg. Sixty five (32.5%) had confirmed glaucomatous optic neuropathy. GAT IOP demonstrated poor agreement with DCT IOP. GAT IOP was on average 2.1 mm Hg less than DCT IOP. None of the six correction formulae resulted in improved agreement with DCT IOP. General linear model analysis found no statistically significant measurement differences between the glaucoma and glaucoma suspect groups. Conclusions: GAT demonstrated poor agreement with DCT, and agreement did not improve after adjustment with correction formulae. Our results suggest that correction formulae for GAT IOP are unsuitable to clinically approximate ‘true’ IOP in Caucasian glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients.     

Ocuton-S self tonometry vs. Goldmann tonometry; a diurnal comparison study

PURPOSE: To compare 24-hour diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the Ocuton-S applanation self tonometer and the Goldmann tonometer. METHODS: 24-hour diurnal IOP curves were obtained on 14 eyes of 7 trained patients suffering from medically controlled primary open angle glaucoma. IOP was measured every third hour starting at 9 a.m. with a calibrated Goldmann tonometer; one week later, a similar set of measurements was obtained with Ocuton-S self tonometry by the patients. One week later still, ultrasound corneal pachymetry was performed at the same hours. RESULTS: Overall IOP (24-hour mean) did not differ significantly between the different measuring techniques (ANOVA, p = 0.74), but the IOP differed in a statistically significant manner around the clock (ANOVA, p = 0.00006). The mean Goldmann tonometric readings were up to 2.8 mmHg lower than the Ocuton-S values during the daytime (9 a.m. to 9 p.m.), however, during the night (12 midnight to 6 a.m.) mean IOP measured with Goldmann tonometry was 2.2 to 3.3 mmHg higher than the corresponding average of the self tonometry readings. There was a statistically significant interaction between the type of tonometry and the time of the measurement (p = 0.0007). Central corneal thickness (CCT) showed a significant change during the 24-hour period (p = 0.000001). CONCLUSION: IOP shows a different diurnal curve when measured with the Goldmann tonometer and with the Ocuton-S applanation self tonometer. The instruments' readings might be influenced in different ways by the diurnal changes of the corneal thickness. Since Ocuton-S self tonometry underestimates the IOP in the early morning period, a careful evaluation is necessary when nocturnal and early morning IOP elevation is investigated with this technique.     

Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis

PURPOSE: To understand and quantify intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement errors introduced by corneal variables during applanation tonometry using a cornea biomechanical model. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Biomedical Engineering Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. METHODS: The model assumed an overall resultant pressure that was based on the summation of the applanation pressure, the true IOP, and the surface tension caused by the tear film to determine the final deformation of the corneal apex during IOP measurement. Corneal resistance was varied according to the cornea's biomechanical properties, thickness, and curvature, and the effect of each variable on the accuracy of IOP tonometry readings was examined quantitatively. RESULTS: The model demonstrated that tonometry readings do not always reflect true IOP values. They deviate when corneal thickness, curvature, or biomechanical properties vary from normal values. Based on the model, predicted IOP readings have a 2.87 mm Hg range resulting from the variation in the corneal thickness in the normal population and a 1.76 mm Hg range from the variation in the corneal radius of curvature. Considering that Young's modulus of the corneal varies from 0.1 to 0.9 MPa in the normal population, the model predicts tonometry IOP readings will have a range of 17.26 mm Hg because of the variation in this corneal biomechanical parameter alone. CONCLUSIONS: The simulation based on the model demonstrated quantitatively that variations in each corneal variable cause errors in tonometry IOP readings. The simulation results indicate that differences in corneal biomechanics across individuals may have greater impact on IOP measurement errors than corneal thickness or curvature.     

Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry

PURPOSE: The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT, Pascal tonometer, Swiss Microtechnology AG, Port, Switzerland) was recently introduced as a new method of intraocular pressure measurement, supposedly independent of corneal properties. In this study we analyzed the agreement and correlation of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and investigated the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal curvature. We also considered preferential patient groups for both methods. METHODS: In a prospective study of 100 eyes without glaucoma, intraocular pressure was measured using dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry, followed by measurements of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature. RESULTS: A clear correlation between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry was found (r = 0.693; P < 0.001). Dynamic contour tonometry generally resulted in higher intraocular pressure measurements (median difference + 1.8 mm Hg, mean difference + 2.34 mm Hg). Unlike dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry was remarkably affected by central corneal thickness, but neither method was significantly influenced by corneal curvature. Bland-Altman graphs showed remarkable disagreement between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry, which could be partially explained by the influence of central corneal thickness on Goldmann applanation tonometry. To obtain valid readings, dynamic contour tonometry required a more extensive selection of patients than Goldmann applanation tonometry. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic contour tonometry seems to be a reliable method for intraocular pressure measurement, which unlike Goldmann applanation tonometry is not influenced by central corneal thickness. In clinical practice, advantages from dynamic contour tonometry can be expected for cooperative patients, outpatients, and patients with sufficient bilateral ocular fixation, whereas Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements are more reliable in case of patients with inadequate cooperation, poor vision, or nystagmus.     

New ways to measure intraocular pressure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the last 10 years, several new means to measure intraocular pressure have emerged. This review covers recent findings concerning four new technologies: the ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, rebound tonometry and the Proview phosphene tonometer. RECENT FINDINGS: The ocular response analyzer provides measurements of corneal biomechanics, including corneal hysteresis. Intraocular pressure readings from the ocular response analyzer have correlated well with Goldmann applanation tonometry and seem to be independent of corneal thickness in nonglaucoma patients; however, further studies are needed to determine whether this is true in glaucoma patients. Dynamic contour tonometry also appears to give pressure readings that are independent of corneal thickness. Rebound tonometry is convenient, can be used without topical anesthesia and appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonometry; however, pressure readings from rebound tonometry are not independent of corneal properties. Use of the Proview phosphene tonometer appears to decrease patient anxiety regarding their glaucoma; however, studies have not been supportive of its accuracy. SUMMARY: Dynamic contour tonometry provides intraocular pressure readings that are less dependent on corneal properties than Goldmann applanation tonometry. Rebound tonometry appears to correlate well with Goldmann tonometry and can be used without topical anesthesia.     

Telemedicine-friendly, portable tonometers: an evaluation for intraocular pressure screening

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) readings from two portable, telemedicine-friendly tonometers for suitability in glaucoma screening. METHODS: 213 eyes of 107 consenting patients attending an eye clinic were tested with an I-care tonometer and a Pulsair-Easy Eye puff-air tonometer. Gold standard IOP was measured with a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Effect of central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth and refractive errors on IOP measurements were also analysed. RESULTS: The mean difference of IOP by GAT and both the portable tonometers was +/- 2.2 mmHg. The analysis indicates minimal difference between IOP readings of both the portable tonometers. The mean difference between two consecutive readings by I-care was 0.01 mmHg. Using 21 mmHg as a threshold for suspected glaucoma, both the portable digital tonometers reported a sensitivity of 38% and specificity of >95%. In the subjects studied, central corneal thickness had statistically significant influence on IOP measurements while refractive errors and anterior chamber depth had no significant influence on IOP measurements with any tonometry. CONCLUSION: The IOP readings by both portable tonometers are comparable and were within clinically acceptable range from GAT. These portable tonometers are useful tools for IOP screening.     

Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer

PURPOSE: Different from conventional tonometers, the pressure phosphene tonometer (FPT) measures intraocular pressure (IOP) through the upper eyelid without corneal applanation. We evaluated the usefulness of the FPT as a self-tonometer by comparing FPT IOP readings with those obtained with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). We also evaluated the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements obtained with the two different devices. METHODS: We confirmed the repeatability of FPT measurements in a preliminary study. The main investigation formed part of a prospective clinical trial, in which IOP was measured in 101 eyes of 101 participants (55 normal and 46 glaucomatous eyes) using GAT and FPT. FPT measurements were self-acquired by each participant. CCT was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter. The agreement between FPT and GAT measurements was evaluated by the method of Bland and Altman. Using individual IOP and CCT values, we determined the correlation coefficients and performed regression analysis. RESULTS: FPT met the British Standard criteria for reproducibility. Among 101 participants, seven patients with glaucoma were unable to detect the pressure phosphene and to measure IOP using the FPT. By the statistical method of Bland and Altman there was a significant difference between FPT readings self-measured by the remaining 94 participants and GAT readings obtained by an ophthalmologist. There was no correlation between FPT and CCT readings in 65 participants with no prior history of anti-glaucoma medications or glaucoma surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Self-tonometer FPT readings differed from GAT readings. However, we suggest that the FPT may be a clinically acceptable device because it enables patients to self-measure their IOP easily and safely. As FPT readings are not affected by CCT, this tonometer may be of clinical and practical value for the at-will measurement of IOP in patients with corneal changes.