Clinical phase II evaluation of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin in metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: Paclitaxel as single agent has shown marked activity in several malignancies. The aim of the present phase II trial was to determine the activity of paclitaxel/cisplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Patients and methods: 200 mg/m² paclitaxel was administered over three hours followed by cisplatin (100 mg/m²), repeated every 22 days. Twenty-eight patients were entered and received a total of 99 cycles (median 2, range 1–6). All patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 25 for response.Results: Hematologic toxicities included leukopenia CTC grade 3 in 13 patients, and grade 4 in five patients, neutropenia grade 3 in nine patients, and grade 4 in eigth patients, grade 3 anemia and grade 2 thrombocytopenia in one patient each. Non-hematologic toxicities included hypotension grade 2 (six patients), grade 3 (four patients), and grade 4 (two patients). A decline in renal function was observed in 15 courses and 10 patients, leading to a median delay of 2.5 days. Neurosensory and neuromotor toxicity grade 1 were observed in 13 patients (grade 2: 12 patients; grade 3: one patient), myalgia grade 3 in one patient, asthenia grade 3 in two and grade 4 in one patient. Partial responses were observed in 12 patients for an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI: 28%–68%) with a median response duration of 6.5 months (range 1-10 months). Stable disease was observed in seven patients, of who two also had clinical benefit.Conclusions: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m² administered over three hours combined with cisplatin 100 mg/m² is an active regimen warranting further evaluation.     

A phase II study of docetaxel in patients with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

This study was designed to evaluate the activity, safety and tolerance of docetaxel (D) in a selected population with metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Twenty-four patients with no prior palliative therapy were enrolled and received D 100 mg m(-2) by 1 h of infusion, every 3 weeks. All but two patients had been evaluated for efficacy on lung metastatic sites. No prophylactic administration of anti-emetics or growth factors was given. A pharmacokinetic study was performed in 22 patients. Twenty-one patients were assessable for response and 24 for toxicity. One hundred and four cycles were administered with a median of 4.5 (range 1-9) per patient. The median cumulative dose was 449 mg m(-2). Partial responses were achieved in five patients with a median duration of 18.7 weeks (range 13.1-50.3). The overall response rate was 20.8% with a median duration of 11.0 weeks (range 2.4-52.6). The most frequent side-effect was neutropenia (79.2% grade IV) but with a short duration (median 4 days) and no febrile neutropenia. The incidence of moderate/severe fluid retention was 29.2% with one treatment discontinuation. Other toxicities (all grades) were common (skin 75%, asthenia 50%, infection 29.2%, nausea 16.7%, diarrhoea 12.5%, stomatitis 16.7%, vomiting 8.3% and HSR 8.3%). A mean clearance of 19.6 l h(-1) m(-2) and an area under the curve of 6.00 microg ml(-1) h(-1) was found in the pharmacokinetic analysis. Docetaxel is active in this selected population with metastatic SCCHN, with a good tolerance.     

Docetaxel and cisplatin: An active regimen in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: Docetaxel and cisplatin are among the most active antitumor agents in head and neck cancer, and phase I studies found the combination of the two drugs to be feasible. The EORTC ECSG performed a multicenter phase II study in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck to evaluate the antitumor efficacy and toxicity of this combination.Patients and methods: Eligibility criteria included written informed consent, a WHO performance status <2, life expectancy of >12 weeks, and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Neoadjuvant pretreatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy or prior radiotherapy were allowed. Patients were ineligible if pretreated with taxoids, had CNS involvement, concurrent malignancy, peripheral neuropathy, or no measurable disease. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (one-hour i.v. infusion), followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (three-hour i.v. infusion), repeated every three weeks. Supportive care included hydration, 5HT3- antagonists, and corticosteroids.Results: Forty-four patients (median age 55 years, range 35–76) entered the trial; 41 patients were eligible, 164 cycles of treatment were evaluable for toxicity, and 31 patients for response. Fourteen patients had undergone prior surgery, 15 had received radiotherapy, and five had had chemotherapy. A median number of four treatment cycles (range 1–6) was given. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were common, but hypersensitivity reactions and fluid retention were very infrequent due to corticosteroid prophylaxis. Four patients were taken off the study due to toxicity, and one toxic death occurred due to pneumonia. Among 41 eligible patients, objective responses as confirmed by independent review included six complete remissions and 16 partial remissions, resulting in an overall response rate of 53.7% (95% confidence interval: 37.4%–69.3%). Responses occurred in locally advanced, recurrent and metastatic disease, both in pre- and non-pretreated patients. Of 22 evaluable, non-pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease, five achieved complete responses, and 14 partial responses. Observed among nine evaluable pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer were one complete response and two partial responses.Conclusion: The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is feasible and active in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.     

Weekly cisplatin paclitaxel and continuous infusion fluorouracil in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study

Background Cisplatin, paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have demonstrated significant activity in patients with advanced squamous head and neck cancer (HNSCC) despite relevant toxicity. A weekly administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel with continuous infusion of 5-FU could offer a better toxicity profile without affecting dose intensity or treatment outcome. We evaluated the toxicity and the activity of weekly cisplatin/paclitaxel with continuous infusion 5-FU in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC.Methods A total of 44 patients were studied. Treatment consisted of two 6-week cycles with weekly cisplatin 20 mg/m² and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² and daily continuous infusion 5-FU 200 mg/m² from day 1 to 42. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and response.Results 40 out of 44 patients were evaluable for response. After two cycles we observed seven complete responses (16%) and 12 partial responses (27%), with a 43% (95% CI 28–58%) overall response rate. Stable disease was seen in 13 patients (29%) and progressive disease in 12 patients (27%). Toxicity was mild in treated patients: we observed less than 10% of grade 3/4 hematological and gastroenteric toxicity.Conclusions A weekly schedule of cisplatin and paclitaxel associated with continuous infusion 5-FU showed low toxicity in the treatment of advanced HNSCC while significant activity was conserved.     

Phase II study of rubitecan in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

PURPOSE: Rubitecan is an oral camptothecin analogue that has shown activity against a broad spectrum of human tumor xenografts and has been tested in several diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the present study, 19 patients with incurable, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer were treated with rubitecan at the initial dose of 1.5 mg/m(2) x 5 days per week. An appropriate dose modification program was set up according to the observed toxicities. RESULTS: Thirteen out of the 19 treated patients were formally evaluable for tumor response. Ten patients had a disease progression and three patients had a stabilization of disease as their best response. The mean duration of stable disease was 141 days. Median survival was 16 weeks (range 2-22 weeks). Three patients died during the study or less than a month after their last dose of study medication. Hematologic toxicity was serious in this study since four patients discontinued their participation because of severe anemia. The drug was also associated with grade 1-4 neutropenia, and with 1-3 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: We conclude that rubitecan is not effective as a single-agent in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer with the doses and schedule used in this study.     

A phase 2 study of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine every 2 weeks for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer

BACKGROUND:

Preclinical studies suggest that additive or synergistic effects are achieved with the combination of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine. A phase 1 study of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine given every 2 weeks demonstrated encouraging preliminary efficacy against head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC).

METHODS:

This was an open‐label, single‐institution, single‐arm, phase 2 study for patients who had received no more than 2 cytotoxic regimens for recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. All patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m² intravenously plus gemcitabine 1250 mg/m² intravenously every 2 weeks with vitamin B12 and folate support. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); secondary endpoints were to estimate overall survival and to evaluate safety and tolerability.

RESULTS:

Twenty‐five patients received therapy. All patients had received prior radiotherapy, and half had received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Neutropenia (grade ≥3) occurred in 24% of patients. Four patients (16%) had a partial response (PR) according to RECIST, and 5 additional patients (20%) had objective tumor reductions of >20 but <30% did not meet RECIST criteria for a PR. The median overall survival for all treated patients was 8.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS:

Treatment with pemetrexed plus gemcitabine every 2 weeks with vitamin support generally was well tolerated. The results of this study provided further evidence that pemetrexed may have significant palliative activity against advanced HNSCC. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Open label, multi-centre phase II study of raltitrexed (`Tomudex') in patients with inoperable squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck

Background:Raltitrexed (`Tomudex') is a folate based inhibitorof thymidylate synthase which has been registered in Europe and Australia forthe treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. In a European phase I trial ofraltitrexed anti-tumour activity was seen in two patients with head and neckcancer, prompting the current study. Patients and methods:From November 1996 to December 1998, 24patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head andneck from 7 Australian centres received raltitrexed, 3 mg/m² givenintravenously over 15 minutes every 3 weeks, for a maximum of 6 cycles.Patients were required to be chemotherapy naïve and have measurabledisease, age >18 years, WHO performance status initially 2, nosignificant intercurrent illness or organ dysfunction and a life expectancy>12 weeks. Results:Twenty-two men and two women, median age 65 years, medianperformance status 1 were enrolled. Fifteen patients (63%) had receivedboth prior surgery and radiotherapy. In 15 patients (63%) there wasrecurrent locoregional disease only. Twelve patients (50%) received onecycle of treatment with only four patients (17%) receiving four or morecycles of treatment. No patient achieved a complete or partial response,although 5 patients experienced stable disease which lasted a median of 188days (range 61–436). The median survival for the whole group was 101days (range 20–436). Raltitrexed was generally well tolerated withminimal anti-proliferative toxicity. Conclusions:Single-agent raltitrexed does not demonstratesignificant anti-tumour response rates in patients with predominantly locallyrecurrent head and neck cancer.     

Management and palliative chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with distant metastases or locoregional relapse not amenable to radical surgery or radiation therapy are incurable. Median overall survival is approximately 10 months and the site of relapse, frequently in the head and neck area, is responsible for important local and regional complications that significantly impact quality of life. This article will focus on the general management and treatment of these recurrent and/or metastatic patients. We will discuss the challenges faced by the clinician when diagnosing tumor recurrence, as well as the indications and the limitations of the locoregional and systemic treatments available to treat this population.     

Phase I/II study of capecitabine and vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of the combination of capecitabine and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer who relapse after adjuvant and/or first-line treatment. In addition, we aimed to obtain data on efficacy and safety at the recommended dose. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer after failure of prior chemotherapy (including anthracyclines and/or taxanes) were eligible. Capecitabine was administered with a fixed dose of 1000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 1 week rest. One treatment cycle consisted of 6 weeks of treatment containing two treatment periods of capecitabine. Vinorelbine was given intravenously at escalated doses of 25 mg/m(2) (dose level 1) and 30 mg/m(2) (dose level 2) on days 1 and 8, and 22 and 29. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received a total of 91 cycles of capecitabine and vinorelbine. The median number of administered cycles per patient was three (range one to six). Thirty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity. At dose level 2 four out of seven patients experienced DLTs (nausea/vomiting, febrile neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia, infection and diarrhea); thus, the MTD was defined. In order to confirm the safety and efficacy, dose level 1 was extended to 24 patients. Two patients [8.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1% to 27%] showed DLTs (hospitalization due to febrile neutropenia and prolonged neutropenia). The main toxicity was neutropenia, which was observed at National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3 and 4 in 39% of patients. The overall response rate for capecitabine and vinorelbine was 55% (95% CI 36% to 72.7%), including three patients with a complete remission. The median time to disease progression was 8 months (95% CI 4.3-11.7) with an overall survival of 19.2 months (95% CI 11.3-27.1) based on intention-to-treat analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of capecitabine and vinorelbine can be administered with manageable toxicity and showed significant efficacy for patients with metastatic breast cancer even after failure of a anthracycline- and/or taxane-based therapy.     

Salvage therapy with oral etoposide in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: The purpose of this retrospective evaluation was to assess the palliative effect of oral etoposide in heavily pretreated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Patients and Methods: Between October 1995 and February 2003, a total of 26 patients with metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) were treated with oral etoposide. Therapy consisted of etoposide at a total dose of 100 mg daily for 7 days and was repeated every 4 weeks until progression of disease or for a maximum of 8 courses. Eighteen patients underwent primary surgery of the tumour followed by adjuvant irradiation or surgery after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Eight patients had primary irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy. All patients previously received at least one palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin/5-floururacil (5-FU) or cisplatin/taxotere. Patients did not routinely receive anti-emetic medication. Results: All patients were eligible for toxicity and survival assessment, and 24 of 26 patients for response evaluation according to an intention-to-treat principle. Two patients had a partial response (8 percent); disease was stable in 9 patients (35 percent) and progressed in 13 patients (50 percent). The median time to progression for all patients was 3 months (range, 2-54), and median overall survival was 10 months (range, 2-52). Toxicity was in general mild and moderate (Grade 1 and 2), except three patients, who experienced Grade 3 anaemia, and one patient who had Grade 3 thrombocytopenia without bleeding complications. Severe nonhematologic adverse reactions were not seen, except for alopecia. Conclusion: Our data suggest that oral etoposid is markedly effective, in regard to stabilization of disease and survival, and an excellent tolerated therapy for pretreated patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck carcinomas. Its advantage over other commonly used and more intensive regimens such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + cisplatin or taxane-containing combinations is its superior tolerance, in particular the incidence of nausea and vomiting, complete alopecia, and/or hematologic complications.     

Optimizing treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction: The majority of patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) will recur. The treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M HNSCC) is rapidly evolving.

Areas covered: This article will comprehensively review the current systemic treatment of R/M HNSCC.

Expert commentary: For the time being, the EXTREME regimen (cetuximab in combination with platinum and 5-fluorouracil) still remains standard of care in previously untreated R/M HNSCC patients who are candidates for combination chemotherapy. Single agents with well documented activity in HNSCC include methotrexate, cisplatin, 5-FU, docetaxel, and paclitaxel. The anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab can be considered the current standard of care in patients with R/M HNSCC progressing after platinum-based therapy based on the results of CheckMate 141 showing a survival benefit over standard of care drugs, such as single agent weekly cetuximab, methotrexate, or docetaxel.

Multiple randomized phase III trials comparing anti-PD(L)-antibodies either as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy or an anti-CTLA-4 with the EXTREME as fist line treatment are ongoing or planned. The outcome of these trials might change the current treatment paradigm in previously untreated R/M HNSCC. Immunotherapeutic agents under active investigation include Toll-like receptor 8 agonists and inhibitors of IDO1.     

Single-agent docetaxel in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN)

BACKGROUND: The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of single-agent docetaxel in patients with platinum-refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). METHODS: Platinum-refractory disease was defined as cancer with documented tumor progression during platinum-based treatment or recurrence within 6 months after platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Patients fulfilling the following criteria were enrolled: histologically confirmed SCCHN, excluding nasopharyngeal cancer; measurable metastatic lesions as assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); and platinum-refractory disease. Docetaxel (60 mg/m2) was administered every 3-4 weeks and continued unless there was evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty patients were recruited. Overall response rate was 10% (2/20) and tumor control rate was 25% (5/20). Median progression-free and median overall survival times were 1.7 and 4.6 months, respectively. The most common hematological toxicities were leucopenia (grade 4: 35%) and neutropenia (grade 4: 30%). Grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 mucositis (functional/symptomatic) each occurred in two patients (10%). One fatal bleeding occurred during this treatment, however, the relation between this event and docetaxel was unlikely. Median inpatient period during treatment was 5.4 days (range, 0-50 days). CONCLUSION: A single-agent docetaxel regimen appeared to offer an acceptable clinical profile in patients with platinum-refractory SCCHN.     

Phase I/II study of paclitaxel and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer

Paclitaxel and vinorelbine are among the most active new agents in metastatic breast cancer. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that the combined administration of these two microtubule-targeting agents is feasible and worthwhile. Based on the promising preclinical data, patients with metastatic breast cancer no longer amenable to conventional treatment were entered into a phase I/II study in which the vinorelbine dose was fixed at 30 mg/sqm and paclitaxel was started at 90 mg/sqm and then subsequently escalated by 30 mg/sqm per step. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Hematopoietic growth factor support was provided from the 4th dose level onwards. Grade III neutropenia was observed only in 2 patients treated at the 5th dose level. Thrombocytopenia never reached grade 3. Neurotoxicity was considered dose-limiting, since grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occured in all three patients treated at the 6th dose level. Other toxicities were mild. Paclitaxel 210 mg/sqm and vinorelbine 30 mg/sqm was the selected combination for phase II. Overall response rate in 34 evaluable patients was 38% (95% confidence interval (C.I.), 22% to 54%). In particular, 3 complete responses (9%) and 10 partial responses (29%) were observed. The observed level of antitumor activity, with an overall response rate of 38% and a median duration of response of 12 months, is of interest, since the study was targeted only to anthracycline-pretreated patients, most of whom had adverse prognostic features. The evaluation of a combination of vinorelbine and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer seems worthwhile and is currently undergoing.     

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine in association with vinorelbine for metastatic breast cancer

Background. Gemcitabine (G) and vinorelbine (V) have favorable safety profile and antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer. To exploit their different mechanism of action and lack of overlapping toxicity, we performed a phase I and II study of G and V in combination. Patients and methods. Fifty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated. In the dose-finding phase, seven cohorts of patients (22 women) received increasing doses to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. Patients recruited in the phase II portion of the study (31 women) received the dose level immediately below the one defined as MTD (i.e., G 1200mg/m², V 30mg/m², on day 1 and day 8, every 3 weeks). Results. Dose escalation was discontinued at G 1400mg/m² and V 30mg/m² because of toxic death due to thrombocytopenia and CNS hemorrage. No other limiting toxicities were observed, and tolerability was similar at all dose levels studied in the escalation portion of the study. The main toxicity was granulocytopenia of grade 3/4 in 36 and 48% of the patients on phase I and II respectively, without episodes of neutropenic fever. Thrombocytopenia was uncommon. Other side effects were usually mild to moderate. In 46 evaluable patients, the response rate was 24% (complete response 7%, partial response 17%). Disease stabilization was observed in further 17%. The median duration of response was 12 months (range 5–14) and the median survival was 20 months (range 1 to 45+). Conclusions. G and V, on day 1 and 8 of 3-weekly cycles, can safely be administered to patients with metastatic breast cancer at the dose of 1200 and 30mg/m², respectively. The antitumor activity of G and V in combination was similar to that reported when using either drug as single agent.     

Chemotherapy for symptom control in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: The role of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent squamouscell carcinomas of the head and neck (SCCHN) is unclear. The aim of this studywas to assess the ability of combination chemotherapy to control symptoms inthis setting.Patients and methods: Using a prospectively accrued database all patientsreferred for chemotherapy with symptomatic relapse following surgery wereidentified. Objective response was recorded using standard criteria andmaximum symptom response was assessed retrospectively from case notes usinga published scoring scale.Results: A total of 57 (median age 56, range 37–85) patients werestudied who had received mainly cisplatin/5-fluorouracil combinations.Thirty-seven had previously received radiotherapy. Fifty-two patients hadevaluable disease; 18 (35%) had objective responses (14 PRs and 4 CRs).There were a total of 103 symptoms recorded with eight different individualsymptoms. Forty-four (43%) symptoms improved on treatment, 52(50%) were unchanged and 7 (7%) worsened. The number of pateintswith improvement in the most frequently recorded symptoms were as follows:pain 11/28 (39%), swelling 12/23 (52%) and dysphagia 6/18(33%). Sixty-seven percent of patients with objective response also hadan improvement in their symptoms but a significant proportion (33%) ofnon-responders had a symptomatic response. Lack of objective response was notcorrelated with worsening symptoms. Grade 3/4 toxicity was uncommon(6%–17%) and there were no toxic deaths. A majority ofpatients (82%) experienced either no change or an improvement inperformance status.Conclusion: These results demonstrate that chemotherapy improves many ofthe symptoms associated with recurrent SCCHN, without deterioration inperformance status. Symptomatic improvement is more likely if there isevidence of significant tumour shrinkage, but even non-responding patients canbenefit.     

Overview of the efficacy of cetuximab in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in patients who previously failed platinum-based therapies

BACKGROUND: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab is active in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The activity of cetuximab was compared with that of commonly used treatments in this setting. METHODS: All patients had recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN and had progressed on cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Efficacy data from 3 prospective studies (n=278 patients) that administered cetuximab as a single agent (n=103 patients) or combined with either cisplatin/carboplatin (n=96 patients) or cisplatin (n=79 patients) were compared with the results from a retrospective study of patients who received various second-line treatments (all treatments including best supportive care only, n=151 patients; chemotherapy, n=43 patients). Safety data considered were only those from the cetuximab studies. RESULTS: Over the 3 cetuximab trials, overall response rates from 10% to 13% and disease control rates from 46% to 56% were observed. The median time to disease progression ranged between 2.2 months and 2.8 months, and the median overall survival ranged between 5.2 months and 6.1 months. No patients who progressed on cetuximab alone responded to additional platinum. These survival data compared favorably with those from the retrospective study (median survival, 3.4 months [n=151 patients] and 3.6 months [n=43 patients]). Cetuximab-based treatments generally were tolerated well, and cetuximab did not increase the side effects associated with platinum therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab has the potential to prolong survival in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN who fail on platinum therapy compared with various second-line therapies. Cetuximab did not increase the toxicities associated with chemotherapy. The results obtained by treatment with cetuximab alone after platinum failure did not appear to differ from the results obtained by reintroducing platinum in combination with cetuximab.     

Late phase II clinical study of vinorelbine monotherapy in advanced or recurrent breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes

BACKGROUND: At present, it is one of the most important issues for the treatment of breast cancer to develop the standard therapy for patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. With the objective of determining the usefulness of vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer after standard therapy, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine in patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. METHODS: Vinorelbine was administered at a dose level of 25 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 3 week cycle. Patients were given three or more cycles in the absence of tumor progression. A maximum of nine cycles were administered. RESULTS: The response rate in 50 evaluable patients was 20.0% (10 out of 50; 95% confidence interval, 10.0-33.7%). Responders plus those who had minor response (MR) or no change (NC) accounted for 58.0% [10 partial responses (PRs) + one MR + 18 NCs out of 50]. The Kaplan-Meier estimate (50% point) of time to progression (TTP) was 115.0 days. The response rate in the visceral organs was 17.3% (nine PRs out of 52). The major toxicity was myelosuppression, which was reversible and did not require discontinuation of treatment. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that vinorelbine monotherapy is useful in patients with advanced or recurrent breast cancer previously exposed to both anthracyclines and taxanes.     

Phase II trial of irinotecan plus cisplatin in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNC have a poor response and survival with currently available chemotherapy agents. Thus, new agents are needed. The authors report the results of a phase II trial of irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent HNC. METHODS: Patients were treated with irinotecan 65 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 were administered intravenously weekly for four weeks, followed by a two week rest. However, after 17 patients were treated with weekly irinotecan at a dose of 65 mg/m2, toxicity analysis demonstrated the poor tolerance of that dose in this patient population. Thus, the protocol was amended, and irinotecan was dose reduced to a starting dose of 50 mg/m2. Twenty-three additional patients were treated with this dose. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled on study between February 2002 and April 2006, 17 patients at the first dose level and 23 patients at the amended dose level. Overall, 12 of 17 patients (71%) treated with irinotecan 65 mg/m2 experienced clinically significant grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Twelve patients required dose reductions. Toxicity was reduced but 17% of patients still experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity on the lower irinotecan dose. The response rate was 35% for patients treated at irinotecan 65 mg/m2 and 22% for patients treated at 50 mg/m2. No complete responses were noted. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of irinotecan and cisplatin is efficacious in a poor prognosis group of patients but toxicity is substantial.