Topotecan and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Results of a multicenter NOGGO: phase I/II study

OBJECTIVE: Second-line treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin enhances survival of women with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). However, because of its cumulative neurotoxicity, there is a strong demand for platinum-combinations with better therapeutic index. Because of its pharmacological properties, topotecan is a good adjunct to carboplatin in this setting, but its safety and efficacy remains to be defined. METHODS: Patients with platinum-sensitive ROC were eligible in this multicenter phase I/II study, stratified according to treatment-free interval (TFI). Dose level 0 consisted of topotecan 1 mg/m(2)/d1-3/q21d plus carboplatin AUC5/d3/q21d. DLT was defined as grade > or =3 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia or grade > or =3 non-hematological toxicity excluding alopecia, nausea and vomiting, accompanied by a treatment delay >1 week. RESULTS: From June 2004 to August 2005, 26 patients were enrolled, receiving a total of 145 cycles of chemotherapy. MTD was reached at topotecan 0.75 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC5. We observed a single grade 4 leucopenia. There were 3 (12%), 15 (58%) and 8 (31%) events of grade 3/4 hematological anaemia, leucopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Response rate was 67% (95% CI 43-85), median progression-free survival 9.5 months (95% CI 7.3-12.0), median overall survival 19.4 months (95% CI 12.3-26.9). None of the toxicity or efficacy endpoints were associated with TFI. CONCLUSION: Topotecan and carboplatin is a well tolerated novel doublet option for women with platinum sensitive ROC. We encourage further studies on this approach, but to limit the doses of topotecan to 0.75 mg/m(2)/d1-3 and carboplatin AUC 5/d3.     

Carboplatin and paclitaxol (Taxol) as an induction regimen for patients with biopsy-proven stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer. an EORTC phase II study (EORTC 08958)

The aim of this study was to document the activity and toxicity of paclitaxel (Taxol)/carboplatin when used as induction chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prior to definitive local treatment within a large, ongoing comparative study (EORTC 08941). 52 eligible, consenting, chemotherapy-na?ve patients with NSCLC, median age of 60 years, stage IIIA N2 disease and the ability to tolerate a pneumonectomy received paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion followed by carboplatin at an area under the concentration curve (AUC) of 6 every 3 weeks for three courses. Most patients received three courses. No grade 3/4 anaemia or thrombocytopenia was documented. Over all of the cycles, 6% (3 patients) experienced grade 3 leucopenia while 63% (32/51 patients) experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia. There was 1 patient (2%) with febrile neutropenia, no early or toxic deaths and no hypersensitivity reactions. Severe non-haematological toxicity was uncommon, with the exception of grade 3 alopecia in 39%, lethargy in 8% and myalgia in 6%. Of the eligible patients (n=52), there was one complete response (CR) and 32 partial responses (PR), resulting in a response rate of 64% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 49%-76%). Of the 15 eligible patients randomised to surgery after induction chemotherapy, 3 patients did not receive surgery and 2 patients (n=12) had no tumour in the mediastinal nodes (17%). Resections were considered complete in 2 of the 12. Median survival for all eligible patients (n=52) was 20.5 months (95% CI 16.1-31.2), with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 68.5% (95% CI 55.2-81.7). In patients with N2 stage IIIA NSCLC, paclitaxel/carboplatin is an active and very well-tolerated induction regimen.     

A phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel as first line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is the leading cause of tumour-related deaths in the elderly population but the optimal management of advanced NSCLC in older patients has not been defined to date. The present phase II study was planned to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (>70 years old) who had pathologically been proven to have a NSCLC and measurable lesions were treated with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 for 3h) and carboplatin [area under the concentration-time curve (AUC=5)] on day 1 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled into the study. The median age was 74 years (range, 70-78 years). Approximately 85% of the patients had stage IV and 80% had a performance status (PS) of 0-1. Nine of the 40 (22.5%; 90% CI 17.6-28.1) included patients had a partial response; one patient (2.5%; 90% CI 1.7-3.2) achieved a complete response. The overall response rate was 25% (90% CI 15.3-38.6). In addition stable disease was observed in 13 patients (32.5%; 90% CI 24.3-40.7). The median survival was 7.8 months (95% confidence interval, 5.1-11.8 months). The actual 1-year survival was 18% (95% confidence interval, 12-29%). The median time to disease progression was 4.1 months (95% CI 2.8-8.5). Overall, 37.5% of patients experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia of any duration with only two patients (5%) developing neutropenic fever. Grade 3 or 4 non-haematological toxicity was uncommon apart alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: In the present phase II study the combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin has demonstrated to be active and safe in an age-selected population.     

Phase I/II study of daily carboplatin, 5-fluorouracil and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

A study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities and the response rate of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil administered daily with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. In a phase I/II clinical trial, patients with histologically documented, unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled. Carboplatin (20-40 mg m(-2) 2-h infusion, daily) and 5-fluorouracil (200 mg m(-2) 24-h continuous infusion, daily) were administered concurrently with radiotherapy on days 1-33. Radiotherapy, with a total dose of 60 Gy, was delivered in 30 fractions on days 1-40. In the phase I portion, the daily dose of carboplatin was escalated from 20 to 40 mg m(-2). Once the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of carboplatin was determined, the study entered the phase II portion. In the phase I portion, the daily MTD and RD of carboplatin were 40 and 35 mg m(-2), respectively. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. In the following phase II study, 30 patients were entered and the objective response rate was 76.7% (95% CI, 62-92%) and the local control rate was 85.7%. The median survival time was 19.8 months, with a survival rate of 70% at 1 year, 36.7% at 2 years. The major toxicities of treatment were neutropenia (>or=grade 3, 87.9%) and thrombocytopenia (>or=grade 3, 23.3%). This combined therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is promising and shows acceptable toxicity.     

Treatment of advanced seminoma with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and carboplatin on an outpatient basis.

This study describes the efficacy and toxicity of a combination regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine (oncovin) and carboplatin (COC) for advanced seminoma on an outpatient basis. Twenty-seven patients (mean age 43 years, range 28-63 years) were classified as stage IIC (n = 5), stage IID (n = 12), stage III (n = 9) or stage IV (n = 1). Six had been treated with prior radiotherapy; elevated beta-HCG and elevated LDH serum levels were observed in 15 and 25 patients respectively. Patients were treated with four cycles of 750 mg m-2 cyclophosphamide intravenously (i.v.), 1.4 mg m-2 vincristine i.v. (maximum 2 mg) and carboplatin adjusted to creatinine clearance. Cycles were given at 3 week intervals. The median dose of carboplatin administered was 400 mg m-2 (range 300-450 mg m-2). Six patients [22%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 6-38%] achieved a complete response (CR), 19 (70%; 95% CI, 51-88%) a partial response and two (8%; 95% CI, 0 18%) showed only a response in tumour markers but not a reduction of retroperitoneal mass (NR). Post-chemotherapeutic masses were not removed surgically or irradiated. After a median follow-up of 26 months (range 5-69 months), two patients have died, one from cardiac arrest 2 years after achieving CR, the other with relapsed seminoma 5 months after therapy. None of the other patients relapsed. Main toxicity was haematological, with 22 patients (81%) experiencing thrombocytopenia WHO grade III/IV and 27 (100%) leucocytopenia WHO grade III/IV, requiring dose reduction in five patients. Seven patients experienced granulocytopenic fever. Non-haematological toxicity was rare. Peripheral neuropathy grade I was observed in four patients and grade III in one. Haemorrhagic cystitis occurred once. In conclusion, despite considerable haematological toxicity, COC is feasible on an outpatient basis, even after prior radiotherapy, and is an effective regimen for advanced seminoma with only 1/27 treatment failures after a median follow-up of 26 months.     

Multicentre phase II study of oxaliplatin as a single-agent in cisplatin/carboplatin +/- taxane-pretreated ovarian cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This multicentre phase II open-label study evaluated safety and antitumour activity of oxaliplatin in cisplatin or carboplatin (cis/carboplatin) +/- taxane-pretreated advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients received oxaliplatin 130 mg/M2 intravenously every 3 weeks, 94% having a performance status (PS) 0-1. All were pretreated with cis/carboplatin and 21 (44%) with paclitaxel. The median number of involved organs was two, 18 (38%) had liver metastasis, 23 (48%) were platinum-resistant and 14 (29%) were taxane-resistant. Forty-two patients were evaluable for a response, 18 (43%) were platinum-resistant and 11 (26%) were taxane-resistant. RESULTS: A total of 253 cycles was administered (median: 5.5/patient). Median cumulative oxaliplatin dose was 666 mg/m2. National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria toxicity analysis showed that seven patients (15%) had grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, two patients (4%) had grade 3 neutropenia, and one patient had grade 3 anaemia. Eleven patients (23%) experienced grade 3 neurosensory toxicity. Of the 29 patients with peripheral neuropathy at the end of treatment, 55% had recovered or improved 1 month later. Eleven objective responses (two complete) were obtained in the 42 evaluable patients [ORR 26%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 14% to 42%], with 10/24 (42%, 95% CI 22% to 63%) in platinum-sensitive, and 1 of 18 (5.6%, 95% CI 0% to 27%) in platinum-resistant patients. Median response duration was 9.2 months (95% CI 6.6% to 11.8%), and median progression-free and overall survival in all treated patients were 4.3 months (95% CI 3.0% to 5.7%) and 15.0 months (95% CI 11.1% to 18.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin has a good safety profile and is active in cis/carboplatin +/- paclitaxel-pretreated AOC patients.     

不能手术的Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌患者每周紫杉醇和卡铂并同步放疗的诱导化疗:一个Ⅱ期研究结果(英文)

Objective: several trials have suggested the superiority of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. It has been hypothesized that the addition of systemic dose sequential chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy, as induction or as consolidation, might further improve survival rates. So we sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of induction paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in inoperable stage Ⅲ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Fifty-six patients with stage Ⅲ inoperable NSCLC received induction chemotherapy with 2 cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC-6 every 3 weeks then patients were assigned to concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel 45 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC-2 weekly along with concurrent radiotherapy at dose of 60 Gy (1.8 Gy/d x 5 d/week). Results: Median age of the 56 eligible patients was 61 years, most of them were males (87.5%). Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common pathological type (55.4%) and 85.7% had a performance status of 1. The majority of patients were presented with stage ⅢB (62.5%). Neutropenia was the most common toxicity during induction therapy (12.5% expressed grade 3) whereas esophagitis was the most common non hematologic adverse reaction during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (14.3% of grade 3). The overall response rate was 71.6% with complete response in 19.6%. After median follow up of 20 months, the median survival time was 13 months (95% CI: 10.917-15.083) and 1 year overall survival rate was 53.6%. Conclusion: This regimen has demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging response to treatment. Evaluation of this regimen in larger number and a phase Ⅲ trial are recommended.     

Combined modality treatment using concurrent radiotherapy and pharmacologically-guided carboplatin for inoperable and incompletely resected non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: In our previous randomised trial, radiotherapy (RT) was given concurrently with carboplatin 350 mg/m(2). We wanted to show that the safety and efficacy of the drug could be improved by pharmacologically-guided dosing based on renal function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had unresectable or incompletely resected NSCLC, good performance status (ECOG 0-2), weight loss < 10%, no distant metastases and adequate haematology and biochemistry. Radiotherapy was given to the primary site and regional lymph nodes to a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Two cycles of carboplatin were given in divided doses of 1-h infusions daily for 5 days before RT weeks 1 and 6. A total plasma AUC of 7 mg/ml per minute per cycle was targeted. The total dose was calculated by using Calvert or Chatelut formulae. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were treated. Patient characteristics included: 78% male; mean age 66 (range: 38--78); 80% stage 3A or 3B; incomplete resection in six patients. The median dose of carboplatin administered per cycle was 850 mg (range 435--1650); 89% of patients received a higher carboplatin dose compared with BSA-calculated dose (mean increase 41%). Forty-two patients (86%) completed treatment as planned. Myelosuppression > or = grade 3 occurred in 14 patients (29%) (one patient died of pneumonia while neutropenic); two patients developed > or = grade 3 acute oesophagitis and two patients had > or = grade 3 acute pulmonary toxicity. Late pulmonary toxicity > or = grade 3 occurred in two patients. The mean potential follow-up time was 2.7 years. The estimated proportion of patients alive and free of local or distant progression at 1 year was 42% and the median survival duration was 16 months (95% CI: 11--21 months). CONCLUSIONS: Radical chest irradiation can be combined with two cycles of pharmacologically-guided full-dose carboplatin, however because our study demonstrated significant haematologic toxicity, we recommend carboplatin dosing according to renal function at less than full dose (i.e. AUC 6 mg/ml per minute per cycle).     

Phase II trial of daily low-dose carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and daily low-dose carboplatin (CBDCA) in elderly patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to estimate tumor response, toxicity and survival. METHODS: Forty patients were entered in a multicenter phase II study. All were patients with pathologically documented unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB or medically inoperable stage I, II NSCLC. CBDCA 30 mg/m2 was given on days 1-5 in weeks 1-4 concurrently with TRT, mainly for radiosensitization. TRT was started 1 h after CBDCA (30 min infusion) was given. TRT was given in 2 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days a week for a total of 50-60Gy. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were assessable for treatment response and toxicity. One patient had a CR and 18 patients PRs with a response rate of 50% (95% CI, 33.4-66.6%). The main toxicities were hematological toxicity. Other toxicities were grade > or =2 esophagitis in one patient, grade 3 nausea/vomiting in one and grade > or =3 pulmonary toxicity in two. There was one treatment-related death due to pulmonary toxicity. For stage IIIA + IIIB patients, the median survival time was 15.1 months and 1-and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 52.6 and 20.5%, respectively. For stage I + II patients, 1- and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 90.9 and 69.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that TRT with daily low-dose CBDCA in elderly patients is effective and feasible because of its low toxicity and survival.     

A phase II study of pemetrexed and carboplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed and carboplatin have demonstrated activity in breast cancer. Their potential synergism in experimental models and the proven efficacy of pemetrexed/platinum in other indications make pemetrexed/carboplatin an attractive combination in breast cancer. Thus, this two-stage, sequential, open-label, multicenter, phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients >/= 18 years with a histologic/cytologic diagnosis and no prior chemotherapy for LABC or MBC received pemetrexed 600 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 5.0 on day 1 every 21 days with folic acid and vitamin B(12) supplementation. RESULTS: From June 2003 to April 2005, 50 patients with stage IIIB (30.0%) and stage IV (70.0%) disease were enrolled at 3 study centers. Twenty-eight percent of patients previously received adjuvant chemotherapy, 46.0% had visceral metastases, and 36.0% had >/=3 organs involved. Partial responses (RECIST criteria) were achieved in 27 (54.0%) patients (ORR = 54.0%; 95% CI, 39.3-68.2%). The median response duration was 11.1 months (95% CI, 6.5-14.0 months) and the median time to disease progression was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.3-14.6 months). CTC hematologic toxicities were grade 3/4 neutropenia (58.0%/28.0%) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia (10.0%) and anemia (18.0%). Two (4.0%) patients had febrile neutropenia, 1 of whom died. No grade 4 non-hematologic toxicities occurred. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities were ALT (4.0%) and AST elevation, and edema, fatigue, pruritus, rash/desquamation, and renal toxicity (2.0% each). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that the combination of pemetrexed and carboplatin has promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Further assessment of this combination in a randomized trial of various breast cancer patient populations is warranted.     

A phase II study of docetaxel weekly in combination with carboplatin every three weeks as first line chemotherapy in stage IIB-IV epithelial ovarian cancer: neurological toxicity and quality-of-life evaluation

The purpose of this study was to assess the response rate, toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in a series of advanced stage ovarian carcinoma patients treated with a first-line weekly docetaxel and three weekly carboplatin regimens. All eligible patients were treated with intravenous docetaxel (30?mg/m2) on Days 1, 8 and 15, and carboplatin (area under the curve, 5) on Day 1; Q21 days for at least 6 cycles. Neurological tests, questionnaires, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and OV28 were used for quality-of-life assessments. One hundred and six patients received at least one cycle of primary chemotherapy (median 6.0; range, 1-9) and they were evaluable for toxicity assessment. Eighty-five patients had evaluable disease and received at least 3 courses of chemotherapy and were evaluable for clinical response rate. The overall response rate was 78.8% (95% CI 70.1-87.5%) and the biochemical response was 92.8% (95% CI 87.2-98.4%). The median PFS was 12.0 months and the median OS was 35.3 months. Thirty-six patients (34.0%) experienced grades 3 and 4 neutropenia, which resulted in the removal of 3 patients. Six patients (5.7%) experienced grades 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. No patients experienced grade 3-4 sensory neuropathy. Epiphora, nail changes and fatigue were frequently recorded non-hematological side effects. The tolerable hematological toxicity (no need for colony-stimulating factors) and the low rate of severe neurotoxicity (only grade 1-2) and response rates in line with the standard 3-week paclitaxel-carboplatin regimen for advanced primary ovarian carcinoma after suboptimal cytoreductive surgery make this regimen an interesting alternative in selected patients.     

Preliminary analysis of a phase II study of Paclitaxel and CHART in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb) is one of the most active single agents for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and ideal in combination with radiation therapy. We designed a phase II study to determine the efficacy and toxicity of continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) and concurrent weekly Paclitaxel (T) in good performance status patients with unresectable stage III A and B NSCLC. T (60 mg/m2) was given as a 3-h infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36; CHART was started on day 15 with 150 cGy/fraction given three times a day for a total dose of 54 Gy in 12 days with no weekend break. Twenty patients were evaluable for acute toxicity. The major acute toxicities were esophagitis and pulmonary toxicity; 70% of the patients experienced grade 2-3 esophagitis and 50% experienced grade > or = 3 pulmonary toxicity. Grade 3 anemia developed in only one patient. Of the 17 patients evaluable for late toxicity, 12% of the patients had grade 3 pulmonary toxicity, one patient developed grade 4 esophagitis. Nineteen patients were evaluable response. The overall response rate was 84% (95% confidence interval, 60-97). CHART with concurrent weekly T seems to be an effective regimen, but tolerability needs to be documented with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up.     

Carboplatin and teniposide as third-line chemotherapy in patients with recurrent oligodendroglioma or oligoastrocytoma: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: This study was a phase II study of third-line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus teniposide in patients with recurrent oligodendroglioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with oligodendroglioma progressive or recurrent after surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy with PCV (lomustine/procarbazine/vincristine) and temozolomide were treated with 350 mg/m(2) carboplatin on day 1, and 50 mg/m(2) teniposide on days 1-3, every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Response and toxicity were evaluated in all 23 patients enrolled in the study. Two had partial response [8.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8% to 28.6%] and 12 stable disease (52.17%; 95% CI 30% to 73%). Median time to progression was 19 weeks (95% CI 11.4-35.0), and 34.8% of the patients (95% CI 20.0% to 61.0%) had progression-free survival at 6 months. Median survival time was 60.7 weeks (95% CI 39.8 to not achieved) and 51% of the patients (95% CI 33.5% to 79.7%) were alive at 12 months. A total of 103 cycles were administered (on average 4.4 per patient; range 1-9). Toxicity was mild and mainly hematological, with grade 4 neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in two (8.6%) and three patients (13%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the response rate of combined carboplatin and teniposide chemotherapy in heavily pretreated oligodendroglial tumors is moderate, the toxicity is manageable, and delay of progression in responders or stable patients may still confer a relevant clinical benefit.     

Carboplatin plus gemcitabine repeating doublet therapy in recurrent breast cancer

PurposeThe combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine is active in metastatic breast cancer. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine, widely used in ovarian and non–small-cell lung cancers, has also been used in breast cancer. This trial examined the efficacy and toxicity of split-dose carboplatin plus gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients with measurable disease, recurrent after adjuvant and ≤ 1 previous treatment for systemic disease, received carboplatin area under the curve = 2.0 (Calvert) plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m², both drugs administered days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Of 15 patients accrued, 13 are fully evaluable.ResultsThere were 2 complete (13.3%) and 6 partial (40%) responses, for an overall response rate by intention to treat of 53.3% (95% CI, 28%-82%). The median time to progression was 4.5 months (95% CI, 2.03-6.97 months), and median overall survival was 28.8 months (95% CI, 9.4-48.2 months). There were 2 patients with grade 3 (13.3%) anemia, 7 patients with grade 3 (46.6%) and 4 patients (26.6%) with grade 4 neutropenia, 4 patients with grade 3 (26.6%) and 3 patients (20%) with grade 4 thrombocytopenia.ConclusionThe repeating doublet of split-dose carboplatin plus gemcitabine reveals activity comparable to that of cisplatin plus gemcitabine, is well tolerated, and warrants evaluation in patients with recurrent breast cancer.     

Cisplatin and carboplatin combination as second-line chemotherapy in dacarbazine-resistant melanoma patients

High-dose cisplatin regimens have been shown to be highly active in advanced melanoma patients but are associated with unacceptable side effects. In order to increase the platinum dose but avoid severe side effects, we treated 15 dacarbazine (DTIC)-resistant metastatic melanoma patients with a combination regimen of cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and carboplatin (200 mg/m2), two platinum analogues with a similar mode of action but a different toxicity pattern. After a mean follow-up period of 10.7 months (range 4-18 months), two patients (13.3%) achieved complete remission and two patients (13.3%) showed partial remission, giving an overall response rate of 26.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2-49%). Furthermore, three patients (20%; 95% CI 0-40.2%) experienced stable disease. The median duration of response was 7.1 months (95% CI 4.2-10.0 months), and the median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% CI 5.8-19.2 months), with eight patients still alive. The main side effects were haematological (leukopenia/thrombocytopenia World Health Organization [WHO] grade I-IV; anaemia WHO grade I-III), gastrointestinal (WHO grade I-III), neurological (WHO grade I-II) and renal (WHO grade I) toxicity. Nevertheless, except in one patient, side effects did not result in discontinuation of therapy. Despite the small number of patients treated in this preliminary study, we believe that combining cisplatin and carboplatin represents a novel, active and well-tolerated therapeutic option as second-line chemotherapy in DTIC-resistant advanced melanoma patients.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty patients with inoperable NSCLC were enrolled onto a multicenter phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Patients received six weekly cycles of paclitaxel 45 mg/m(2) over 1 h; carboplatin at (area under the curve) AUC 2; and radiation therapy of 60 Gy. Radiation was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy over 4 weeks) followed by a boost to the primary tumor (20 Gy in 2 weeks). After the initial phase of concurrent chemoradiation, patients received an additional four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h and carboplatin at AUC 6 every 3 weeks. The overall objective response rate of 30 assessable patients was 76.7%. At the median follow-up time of 13.1 months, the median survival time was 14.5 months (95% CI, 10.59-18.48). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.72-13.28). The major toxicity was hematologic. The incidence of grade 3 esophagitis was 10%. In conclusion, this chemoradiation regimen is well tolerated and shows significant clinical results for locally advanced NSCLC. Locoregional failure rate remains an important issue with this newer chemotherapeutic regimen. A novel chemotherapy and radiation therapy is clearly needed.     

Phase 2 trial of everolimus and carboplatin combination in patients with triple negative metastatic breast cancer

Introduction

Rapamycin acts synergistically with platinum agents to induce apoptosis and inhibit proliferation in breast cancer cell lines. Combination of everolimus also known as RAD001 (oral mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor) and carboplatin may have activity in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods

The primary objective of this study was to determine clinical benefit rate (CBR), that is (complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) + stable disease (SD) lasting ≥6 months) and the toxicity of everolimus/carboplatin in women with metastatic TNBC. Prior carboplatin was allowed. Treatment consisted of intravenous carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 6 (later decreased to AUC 5 and subsequently to AUC 4) every 3 weeks with daily 5 mg everolimus.

Results

We enrolled 25 patients in this study. Median age was 58 years. There were one CR, six PRs, seven SDs and eight PDs (progression of disease). CBR was 36% (95% confidence interval (CI) 21.1 to 57.4%). One SD was achieved in a patient progressing on single agent carboplatin. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI 1.6 to 4.6 months) and overall survival (OS) was 16.6 months (95% CI 7.3 months to not reached). There were seven patients (28%) with ≥ grade 3 thrombocytopenia; three (12%) with grade 3 neutropenia (no bleeding/febrile neutropenia) and one (4%) with grade 3 anemia. Greater hematological toxicity was seen in the first seven patients treated with carboplatin AUC5/6. After the amendment for starting dose of carboplatin to AUC 4, the regimen was well tolerated with only one out of 18 patients with grade 3 neutropenia and two patients with grade 3 thrombocytopenia. There was only one case of mucositis.

Conclusion

Everolimus-carboplatin was efficacious in metastatic TNBC. Dose limiting hematological toxicity was observed when AUC5/6 of carboplatin was combined with everolimus. However, carboplatin AUC 4 was well tolerated in combination with everolimus with continuing responses.

Trial registrations

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01127763","term_id":"NCT01127763"}}NCT01127763.     

Results from a single institution phase II trial of concurrent docetaxel/carboplatin/radiotherapy followed by surgical resection and consolidation docetaxel/carboplatin in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

The optimal treatment of locally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We hypothesized that using a trimodality approach in selected patients with stage IIIA/IIIB disease would be both feasible and efficacious with reasonable toxicity.

Patients/Methods

We enrolled 13 patients with resectable stage III NSCLC on a prospective phase II trial of trimodality therapy. Induction treatment consisted of weekly docetaxel 20 mg/m² and weekly carboplatin at an area under curve (AUC) of 2 concurrent with 45 Gy thoracic radiotherapy. Resection was performed unless felt to be unsafe or if patients had progressive disease. Postoperative consolidation consisted of docetaxel 75 mg/m² and carboplatin at an AUC of 6 every 3 weeks for 3 cycles with growth factor support.

Results

All patients responded to induction chemoradiotherapy as measured by total gross tumor volume reductions of 43% on average (range, 27%-64%). Twelve patients underwent resection of the tumor and involved nodes, yielding a resectability rate of 92%. The primary endpoint of 2-year overall survival (OS) was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36%-90%), and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 36% (95% CI, 9%-64%). The maximal toxicity observed per patient was grade II in 5 patients (38%); grade III in 7 patients (54%); grade IV in 1 patient (8%); and grade V in none.

Conclusion

This trimodality approach resulted in promising outcomes with reasonable toxicity in carefully selected patients with stage III NSCLC at a single institution.     

Phase I and II trials of vinorelbine with carboplatin for patients 75 years of age or older with previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. We conducted phase I and phase II trials of a combination of vinorelbine and carboplatin for patients ≥75 years of age and with advanced NSCLC.Patients and MethodsPreviously untreated patients (≥75 years of age) with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Based on a 4-week cycle, vinorelbine was given on days 1 and 8, and carboplatin was given on day 1. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as grade 4 hematologic toxicity that lasted 4 days or more, febrile neutropenia; grade 3 or worse nonhematologic toxicities; or the omission of vinorelbine administration on day 8 in the first cycle.ResultsThirteen patients were enrolled in phase I. dose-limiting toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia that lasted 4 days or more, observed in 2 of 4 patients at level 4. Phase II study used the dose of level 3 (20 mg/m² vinorelbine, area under the curve of 4 mg/mL/min carboplatin). Forty-two patients were enrolled. The response rate was 14.6% of 41 assessable patients (95% CI, 3.8-25.4). The median time to progression was 98 days (95% CI, 61-135 days), and the median survival time was 366 days (95% CI, 321-411 days). All toxicities were mild and manageable.ConclusionUse of 20 mg/m² vinorelbine on days 1 and 8, followed by carboplatin area under the curve of 4 mg/mL/min on day 1 every 4 weeks warrants a phase III study for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Combined chemoradiotherapy regimens of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II locally advanced multi-modality protocol.

PURPOSE: This phase II noncomparative randomized trial was conducted to determine the optimal sequencing and integration of paclitaxel/carboplatin with standard daily thoracic radiation therapy (TRT), in patients with locally advanced unresected stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Survival data were compared with historical standard sequential chemoradiotherapy data from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresected stages IIIA and IIIB NSCLC, with Karnofsky performance status > or = 70% and weight loss < or = 10%, received two cycles of induction paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (area under the plasma concentration time curve [AUC] = 6) followed by TRT 63.0 Gy (arm 1, sequential) or two cycles of induction paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 6) followed by weekly paclitaxel (45 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 2) with concurrent TRT 63.0 Gy (arm 2, induction/concurrent), or weekly paclitaxel (45 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 2)/TRT (63.0 Gy) followed by two cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m2)/carboplatin (AUC = 6; arm 3, concurrent/consolidation). RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 39.6 months, median overall survival was 13.0, 12.7, and 16.3 months for arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. During induction chemotherapy, grade 3/4 granulocytopenia occurred in 32% and 38% of patients on study arms 1 and 2, respectively. The most common locoregional grade 3/4 toxicity during and after TRT was esophagitis, which was more pronounced with the administration of concurrent chemoradiotherapy on study arms 2 and 3 (19% and 28%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Concurrent weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, and TRT followed by consolidation seems to be associated with the best outcome, although this schedule was associated with greater toxicity.