Follow-up of patients with unexplained syncope and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias: analysis of the AVID registry and an AVID substudy. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators

INTRODUCTION: A prospective registry and substudy were conducted in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Study to clarify the prognosis and recurrent event rate, risk factors, and impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease, and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Included in the AVID registry were patients from all participating sites who had "out of hospital syncope with structural heart disease and EP-inducible VT/VF with symptoms." In addition, 13 collaborating sites provided more in-depth clinical and electrophysiologic data as part of a formal prospective substudy. Patients in the substudy were followed by local investigators for recurrent arrhythmic events and mortality. Registry patients were tracked for fatal outcomes by the National Death Index. A total of 429 patients with syncope were entered in the AVID registry, of whom 80 participated in the substudy. Of the substudy patients, 21 patients (26%) had inducible polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF), 11 patients (14%) had sustained monomorphic VT <200 beats/min, and 48 patients (60%) had sustained monomorphic VT > or = 200 beats/min. The ICD was used as sole therapy in 75% of the syncope substudy patients (and with antiarrhythmic drug in an additional 9%) and in 59% of the syncope registry patients. Survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 93% and 74% for the substudy patients and 90% and 74% for the registry patients, respectively. Survival of the syncope substudy patients (predominantly treated by ICD) was similar to the VT patients treated by ICD and superior to the VT patients treated by an antiarrhythmic drug (P = 0.05) in the randomized main trial. Mortality events in the substudy were marginally predicted by ejection fraction (P = 0.06) but not by electrophysiologic study-induced arrhythmia. The significant predictor of increased mortality in the registry was age (P = 0.003) and of reduced mortality was treatment with ICD (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The results of these analyses support the role of the ICD as primary antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease, and inducible VT/VF at electrophysiologic study.     

Implantable defibrillator event rates in patients with unexplained syncope and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison with patients known to have sustained ventricular tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical significance of inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope.

BACKGROUND

Induction of sustained ventricular arrhythmias at electrophysiology study in patients with unexplained syncope and structural heart disease is usually assigned diagnostic significance. However, the true frequency of subsequent spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic medications is unknown.

METHODS

In a retrospective case-control study, the incidence of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies for sustained ventricular arrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope or near syncope (syncope group, n = 22) was compared with that of a control group of patients (n = 32) with clinically documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Sustained ventricular arrhythmias were inducible in both groups and neither group received antiarrhythmic medications. All ICDs had stored electrograms or RR intervals. Clinical variables were similar between groups except that congestive cardiac failure was more common in the syncope group.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis of the time to first appropriate ICD therapy for syncope and control groups produced overlapping curves (p = 0.9), with 57 ± 11% and 50 ± 9%, respectively, receiving ICD therapy by one year. In both groups, the induced arrhythmia was significantly faster than spontaneous arrhythmias, but the cycle lengths of induced and spontaneous arrhythmias were positively correlated (R = 0.6, p < 0.0001). During follow-up, three cardiac transplantations and seven deaths occurred in the syncope group, and two transplantations and five deaths occurred in the control group (36-month survival without transplant 52 ± 11% and 83 ± 7%, respectively, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias, spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias occur commonly and at a similar rate to patients with documented sustained VT. Thus, electrophysiologic testing in unexplained syncope can identify those at risk of potentially life-threatening tachyarrhythmias, and aggressive treatment of these patients is warranted.     

Low recurrence of syncope in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

AIMS: To determine the effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in preventing recurrence of syncope in patients with structural heart disease, previously unexplained syncope and inducible ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias had an ICD implanted. All ICDs delivered antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy. Detection and therapy were programmed according to uniform criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 63+/-11 years and most of them were male (36/38). After a mean follow-up of 28+/-15 (4-61) months, six patients died and one underwent heart transplantation. Syncope recurred in three patients, but in none of them was it caused by an arrhythmic event. In 18 patients, 113 episodes of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation were detected and appropriately treated by the ICD. The mean time from implant until first appropriate therapy was 18+/-14 months. The actuarial probability of receiving appropriate therapy was 20% and 42% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible arrhythmias, ICD prevents syncope associated with arrhythmic events. Frequent effective use of antitachycardia pacing and shocks of adjusted energy seem essential to this aim.     

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy improves long-term survival in patients with unexplained syncope, cardiomyopathy, and a negative electrophysiologic study

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with unexplained syncope, ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and a negative electrophysiologic study (EPS). BACKGROUND: EPS is frequently performed to evaluate syncope in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Limited long-term data evaluating all-cause mortality in patients with no inducible arrhythmia or examining the potential benefits from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy are available. METHODS: We evaluated 102 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope, cardiomyopathy, and a negative EPS from September 1996 to December 2000. A blinded matched case-control analysis utilized 51 of these patients (19 treated with an ICD and 32 matched controls treated with conventional therapy). We compared primary endpoint of death and documented cardiac arrest of patients treated with ICD therapy to matched controls. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were 14 primary events among the study population during a follow-up period of 44.3 +/- 20 months: 2 in the ICD group and 12 in the conventional therapy group. The hazard ratio for the risk of event in the ICD group compared with the conventional therapy group was 0.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.85; P = .04). Other comorbid conditions, including age, sex, ischemic etiology of heart failure, ejection fraction, and antiarrhythmic use, did not predict outcome. Appropriate ICD shocks occurred in 26% of patients at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that empiric ICD therapy improves long-term outcomes in patients with unexplained syncope, ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and negative EPS.     

Clinical and electrophysiologic predictors of ventricular tachyarrhythmia recurrence in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

INTRODUCTION: Not all patients experience recurrent sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias after placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). We evaluated the clinical and electrophysiologic predictors of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) recurrence following ICD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n = 133) underwent 4 +/- 3 serial electrophysiologic studies (EPS) over 50 +/- 26 months following ICD implantation. Sustained VT/VF could always be induced during follow-up EPS in 49 patients; sustained VT/VF was sometimes induced during follow-up EPS in 47 patients; and sustained VT/VF could never be induced during follow-up EPS in 37 patients. Spontaneous VT/VF requiring ICD therapy occurred in 107 patients during follow-up. Patients with sustained VT/VF that was always inducible or sometimes inducible during follow-up experienced more frequent episodes of VT/VF following ICD implant (20.5, 95% CI 12.7-33.0; and 17.8, 95% CI 11.3-28.1 episodes/patient respectively; vs 3.0, 95% CI 2.0-4.6 episodes/patient for patients with VT/VF never induced, P < 0.001). Inducibility of sustained VT/VF post-ICD implant (P < 0.001) and sustained VT as the presenting arrhythmia (P = 0.02) were independent predictors of spontaneous VT/VF recurrence. CONCLUSION: Reproducibly inducible VT/VF following ICD implantation predicts a high probability of VT/VF recurrence and identifies a cohort of patients who experience frequent episodes of VT/VF over time. Persistent noninducibility of sustained VT/VF identifies a group of patients who experience no or very few episodes of VT/VF recurrence.     

Comparison of event rates and survival in patients with unexplained syncope without documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias versus patients with documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias both treated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

Patients with unexplained syncope and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias during electrophysiologic testing have an increased cardiac mortality rate. We compared event rates and survival of 178 patients with unexplained syncope and no documented ventricular arrhythmias (syncope group) versus 568 patients with documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT or fibrillation (VF) (VT/VF group) treated, as part of a lead (Ventritex TVL) investigation, with similar implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) capable of extensive data storage. The 2 groups shared similar clinical characteristics. The mean follow-up was 11 months for the syncope group and 14 months for the VT/VF group. The mean time from device implantation to first appropriate therapy was similar in the 2 groups (109 +/- 140 vs 93 +/- 131 days, p = 0.40). Actuarial probability of appropriate ICD therapy was 49% and 55% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, in syncope group and 49% and 58% in VT/VF group (p = 0.57). Recurrent syncope was associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias in 85% and 92% of the syncope group and VT/VF group, respectively (p = 0.54). At 2 years, actuarial survival was 91% in the syncope group and 93% in VT/VF group (p = 0.85). We conclude that patients treated with ICD with unexplained syncope and induced VT/VF have an equally high incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and low mortality compared with similar patients with documented VT/VF. These findings, plus the high association between recurrent syncope and ventricular arrhythmias, indicate that VT/VF are likely etiologies in selected patients with unexplained syncope and support ICD therapy in such cases.     

Utility of electrophysiological studies to predict arrhythmic events

AIM: To evaluate the prognostic value of electrophysiological stimulation (EPS) in the risk stratification for tachyarrhythmic events and sudden cardiac death (SCD).METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study and analyzed the long-term follow-up of 265 consecutive patients who underwent programmed ventricular stimulation at the Luzerner Kantonsspital (Lucerne, Switzerland) between October 2003 and April 2012. Patients underwent EPS for SCD risk evaluation because of structural or functional heart disease and/or electrical conduction abnormality and/or after syncope/cardiac arrest. EPS was considered abnormal, if a sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) was inducible. The primary endpoint of the study was SCD or, in implanted patients, adequate ICD-activation.RESULTS: During EPS, sustained VT was induced in 125 patients (47.2%) and non-sustained VT in 60 patients (22.6%); in 80 patients (30.2%) no arrhythmia could be induced. In our cohort, 153 patients (57.7%) underwent ICD implantation after the EPS. During follow-up (mean duration 4.8 ± 2.3 years), a primary endpoint event occurred in 49 patients (18.5%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.593 (95%CI: 0.515-0.670) for a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35% and 0.636 (95%CI: 0.563-0.709) for inducible sustained VT during EPS. The AUROC of EPS was higher in the subgroup of patients with LVEF ≥ 35% (0.681, 95%CI: 0.578-0.785). Cox regression analysis showed that both, sustained VT during EPS (HR: 2.26, 95%CI: 1.22-4.19, P = 0.009) and LVEF < 35% (HR: 2.00, 95%CI: 1.13-3.54, P = 0.018) were independent predictors of primary endpoint events.CONCLUSION: EPS provides a benefit in risk stratification for future tachyarrhythmic events and SCD and should especially be considered in patients with LVEF ≥ 35%.     

Predictive value of ventricular arrhythmia inducibility for subsequent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II patients.

In the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)-randomized patients underwent electrophysiologic testing. Both inducible and noninducible patients received an ICD. We correlated inducibility with the occurrence of subsequent ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Intracardiac ICD electrograms for subsequent events were analyzed to categorize the spontaneous arrhythmia as VT or VF. The two-year Kaplan-Meier event rate for VT in inducible patients was 29.0% versus 19.3% in noninducible patients. However, ICD therapy for spontaneous VF was less common at two years in inducible patients (3.2%) than in noninducible patients (8.6%). In the MADIT II study, inducibility predicted an increased likelihood of VT but decreased VF. OBJECTIVES: We correlated electrophysiologic inducibility with spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II. BACKGROUND: In the MADIT II study, 593 (82%) of 720 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) randomized patients underwent electrophysiologic testing. Patients received an ICD whether they were inducible or not. METHODS: A "standard" inducibility definition included sustained monomorphic or polymorphic VT induced with three or fewer extrastimuli or VF induced with two or fewer extrastimuli. We compared a narrow inducibility definition (only monomorphic VT) and a broad definition (standard definition plus VF with three extrastimuli). We used ICD-stored electrograms to categorize spontaneous VT or VF. RESULTS: Inducible patients (standard definition) had a greater likelihood of experiencing ICD therapy for VT than noninducible patients (p = 0.023). Unexpectedly, ICD therapy for spontaneous VF was less common (p = 0.021) in inducible patients than in noninducible patients. The two-year Kaplan-Meier event rate for VT or VF was 29.4% for inducible patients and 25.5% for noninducible patients. Standard inducibility did not predict the combined end point of VT or VF (p = 0.280, by log-rank analysis). The narrow inducibility definition outperformed the standard definition, whereas the broad definition appeared inferior to the standard definition. CONCLUSIONS: In the MADIT II study patients, inducibility was associated with an increased likelihood of VT. Noninducible MADIT II study subjects using this electrophysiologic protocol had a considerable VT event rate and a higher VF event rate than inducible patients. Induction of polymorphic VT or VF, even with double extrastimuli, appears less relevant than induction of monomorphic VT.     

Significance of inducible ventricular fibrillation in patients with coronary artery disease and unexplained syncope

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the incidence and prognostic significance of inducible ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and unexplained syncope. BACKGROUND: Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines recommend implantation of internal cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with unexplained syncope in whom either ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF is inducible during electrophysiologic (EP) testing. Although the prognostic significance of inducible monomorphic VT is known, the significance of inducible VF remains undefined. METHODS: We evaluated 118 consecutive patients with CAD and unexplained syncope who underwent EP testing. Sustained monomorphic VT was inducible in 53 (45%) patients; in 20 (17%) patients, VF was the only inducible arrhythmia; and no sustained ventricular arrhythmia was inducible in the remaining 45 (38%) patients. The latter two groups of 65 (55%) patients make up the study population. RESULTS: There were 16 deaths among the study population during a follow-up period of 25.3 +/- 19.6 months. The overall one- and two-year survival in these patients was 89% and 81%, respectively. No significant difference in survival was observed between patients with and without inducible VF (80% power to detect a fourfold survival difference). CONCLUSIONS: In 17% of patients with CAD and unexplained syncope, VF is the only inducible ventricular arrhythmia. Within the limits of this pilot study, long-term follow-up of patients with and without inducible VF demonstrates no difference in survival between the two groups. Therefore, the practice of ICD implantation in patients with CAD, unexplained syncope and inducible VF, especially with triple ventricular extrastimuli, may merit reconsideration.     

Implantable defibrillator event rates in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on Holter and a left ventricular ejection fraction below 30%

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the incidence of appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interventions for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) and nonsustained VT in the presence of a left ventricular ejection fraction below 30%, versus in patients with syncope and patients with a history of VT or VF. BACKGROUND: To date, only limited information is available about the prophylactic use of ICDs in patients with IDC. METHODS: From January 1993 to July 2000, 101 patients with IDC underwent implantation of ICDs with electrogram storage capability at our institution. Patients were placed into one of three groups according to their clinical presentation: asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic nonsustained VT in the presence of a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 30% (49 patients, prophylactic group), unexplained syncope or near syncope (26 patients, syncope group) and a history of sustained VT or VF (26 patients, VT/VF group). RESULTS: During 36 +/- 22 months follow-up, 18 of 49 patients (37%) in the prophylactic group received appropriate shocks for VT or VF, compared with 8 of 26 patients (31%) in the syncope group and with 9 of 26 patients (35%) of the VT/VF group. Multivariate Cox analysis of baseline clinical variables identified left ventricular ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation and a history of sustained VT or VF as predictors for appropriate ICD interventions during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IDC and prophylactic ICD implantation for nonsustained VT in the presence of a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 30% had an incidence of appropriate ICD interventions similar to that of patients with a history of syncope or sustained VT or VF. These findings indicate that ICDs may have a role in not only secondary but also primary prevention of sudden death in IDC.     

Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Utilization Among Device Recipients Presenting Exclusively with Syncope or Near-Syncope

ICD Use in Syncope. Introduction : Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are occasionally used in presumed high-risk patients with electrocardiographically undocumented syncope, although the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in this population is not well defined.
Methods and Results : We studied 33 consecutive patients receiving; an ICD (67% nonthoracotomy and 70% tiered therapy) after electrophysiologic testing for unmonitored "syncope" (n = 29) or "near-syncope" (n = 4). Atherosclerotic heart disease was present in 24 (73%); mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 0.39 ± 0.15; and sustained monomorphic ventricular tacycardia (SMVT) was inducible in 18 (55%). Over a median follow-up of 17 months (range 4 to 61), 12 patients (36%) received ≥ 1 appropriate ICD discharge triggered by SMVT (cycle length 230 lo 375 msec) in 10 and ventricular Mutter or fibrillation in 2—without concomitant antiarrhythmic medication in 8 of 12 cases, Inducible SMVT and LAEF ≤ 0.35 were statistically significant, independent predictors of an appropriate ICD discharge (P < 0.02 and P < 0.03, respectively). Estimated 1-year cumulative survival free of appropriate discharge was 34% versus 87%, respectively, in patients with versus without inducible SMVT (P < 0.02), and 18% versus 56%, respectively, in patients with LVEF ≤ 0.35 versus LVEF > 0.35 (P < 0.03).
Conclusion : In this highly select, multicenter population of ICD recipients with electrocardiographically undocumented syncope, a substantial incidence of appropriate device discharges was observed, particularly in patients with inducible SMVT and LVEF ≤ 0.35. These findings support the notion that, in patients with LV dysfunction and inducible SMVT, ventricular tachyarrhythmias are likely to account for episodes of syncope or near-syncope.     

Correlation between the signal-averaged electrocardiogram and electrophysiologic study findings in patients with coronary artery disease and sustained ventricular tachycardia

Ventricular late potentials at the end of the surface QRS, detected on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) have been shown to be markers for spontaneous and/or inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We examined the correlations between electrophysiologic study (EPS) findings and SAECG indexes in 50 patients with chronic CAD with documented spontaneous VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF), who had either syncope (24 patients) or aborted sudden cardiac death (SCD). The prevalence of late potentials was significantly higher in the syncope patients (75%) compared with the SCD group (46%) (p less than 0.05). No correlation was found between the ventricular refractoriness and the SAECG indexes. There was a significant difference in quantitative SAECG indexes comparing the induction mode of the sustained VT/VF by single and double versus triple extrastimuli; the types of the induced VT (sustained monomorphic, sustained pleomorphic or VF, noninducible); and the cycle length of the induced sustained monomorphic VT with the high frequency QRS duration (QRSD). In conclusion, differences in prevalence and characteristics of ventricular late potentials were found between patients with syncope and with SCD. The degree of abnormality of SAECG indexes correlated with the type and the mode of induction of sustained VT. The magnitude of QRSD of the SAECG correlated with the cycle length of monomorphic VT. The above findings suggest that in patients with CAD and sustained VT/VF the SAECG variables are related to the area of reentry.     

Clinical significance of the electrophysiologic study (EPS)-guided therapy for the secondary prevention of ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Although electrophysiologic study (EPS) is one of the most reliable methods for selecting preventive therapy for patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), VT may recur during EPS-guided effective therapy; therefore, the importance of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been emphasized. In this study, the prognoses of VT patients were evaluated to clarify the importance of EPS-guided therapy for the secondary prevention of VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 99 consecutive patients with a history of sustained VT, which was inducible in EPS. The VT induction protocol used 1-3 extrastimuli and rapid ventricular pacing at 2 right ventricular sites and included additional isoproterenol infusion. ICD implantation was applied to all patients with an episode of hemodynamically unstable VT, regardless of the result of preventive therapy. For preventive therapy, an antiarrhythmic drug and/or catheter ablation were selected, and they were defined as being effective in the EPS-guided therapy when the induction of VT was completely prevented. When no therapy was effective for prevention, an antiarrhythmic drug was prescribed under ICD implantation. During the follow-up period of 19+/-20 months, VT recurred in 17 of 32 patients (53%) in the ineffective group and in 10 of 67 patients (15%) in the effective group (p=0.0001). The therapies used in the effective group were class I antiarrhythmic drug in 9, class III in 15, and catheter ablation in 35 patients. Between the patients with and without VT recurrence, there were no significant differences in the left ventricular ejection fraction and the maximum number of repetitive ventricular responses that remained in VT induction in EPS. CONCLUSIONS: Although VT may recur in up to 15% of patients with EPS-guided effective therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly reduced in comparison to that in the ineffective group. EPS-guided therapy may be useful to reduce the clinical recurrence of VT, as well as the action of ICD.     

Voraussetzungen der ICD-Implantation

An electrophysiological study (EPS) and a programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) are strongly recommended and clearly indicated before the implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), if patients present with a cardiac arrest and no structural heart disease or a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. In these patients the prevalence of a curable cause of the cardiac arrest, such as accessory pathways or an idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT), is high and the ICD implantation may be avoided. The same is true for patients who present with a cardiac arrest and a short PQ interval or a delta wave. If patients present with wide-complex tachycardias and the diagnosis of VT is unclear, an EPS and PVS are also clearly indicated. If patients have syncope or nonsustained VTs and a structural heart disease, PVS may be used for risk stratification. However, EPS and PVS may be of little use in patients with a structural heart disease and an impaired left ventricular function after a survived cardiac arrest or an unstable VT, which makes them candidates for ICD implantation anyway.     

Prognostic significance of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after revascularization

INTRODUCTION: Two randomized trials (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial [MADIT] and Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial [MUSTT]) suggest that implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement is associated with improved survival in patients with coronary artery disease, depressed left ventricular function, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) who also have inducible sustained VT. However, neither study directly addresses the management of such patients who develop nonsustained VT early after revascularization. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 109 consecutive patients who underwent electrophysiologic testing to evaluate nonsustained VT, which occurred 5 +/- 4 days following revascularization. Sustained monomorphic VT was inducible in 46 (42%) patients; these patients received an ICD. The remaining 63 (58%) noninducible patients received neither antiarrhythmic drug therapy nor an ICD. During 27 +/- 12 months of follow-up, 15 (33%) of 45 patients with an implanted ICD received at least one appropriate therapy from the device and 26 (24%) of the 109 study patients died. The 1- and 2-year freedom from ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation or sudden death in noninducible patients (97% and 93%) was significantly greater than that of inducible patients (84% and 71%; P = 0.001). However, no difference was observed in total mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with nonsustained VT during the early postrevascularization period who have inducible VT have a high incidence of arrhythmic events. Although this study was not designed to assess the impact of ICD placement on the total mortality of inducible patients, the finding that one third of these patients received appropriate ICD therapy suggests that the device may have a protective effect in these patients.     

Evaluation of therapeutic interventions of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia guided by an electrophysiologic study: a case report

Therapeutic evaluation of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) using electrophysiologic study (EPS) is presented in a case of refractory VT. A 54-year-old man with a history of recurring syncope underwent coronary angiography which revealed total occlusion of the posterior descending branch of the right coronary artery. Left ventriculography showed a left ventricular aneurysm at the cardiac apex. Ejection fraction of the left ventricle was 36%. He had four VTs of different QRS morphologies in 12 lead electrocardiograms. According to our programmed ventricular stimulations, single or double, and rarely triple, extra stimuli were administered after eight basic stimuli at two basic cycle lengths. Rapid ventricular pacing, up to 210 bpm, was then added. The stimuli were delivered to two different sites in the right ventricle and to at least one site in the left ventricle. When the entire protocol could not induce VT, isoproterenol was given intravenously, and the same protocol was repeated. No drug could prevent VT attacks, even after the surgical resection of two VT foci, VT was still inducible. Postoperative drug therapy could not prevent VT induction in EPS. However, changes in the mode required for VT induction were observed. Among 47 patients with sustained monomorphic VT treated in our hospital, 24 had EPS to evaluate the efficacies of therapeutic interventions, such as drugs and surgery. In 14 patients, no VT was induced by the entire VT induction protocol. Among the remaining 10 patients, four showed changes in the VT induction mode, but VT recurred in their clinical courses even after their treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Role of electrophysiologic study (EPS)-guided preventive therapy for the management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF) are 1 of the most important factors determining the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). Although priority is given to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death, electrophysiologic-study (EPS)-guided preventive therapy could be important for reducing the number of cardiac events. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 864 patients with a history of HF, an EPS was performed in 168 and 121 had inducible VT/VF. Under the basic therapy of an ICD, additional catheter ablation was attempted for 95 of 124 monomorphic VT foci in 74 patients, and 78 of the VT were successfully ablated. The prognoses were compared among 5 patient groups with different results for the EPS and catheter ablation: (1) success group (n=43), (2) failure group (n=15), (3) not attempted group (n=16), (4) VF group (n=47), and (5) no inducible VT/VF group. During a follow-up period of 31+/-22 months, the incidence of VT/VF was lower in the success and no inducible VT/VF groups than in the other groups (p=0.0018), although a significant difference was not observed for the total deaths. CONCLUSION: EPS-guided preventive therapy using an ICD and catheter ablation can be useful, at least for the reduction of arrhythmic events in patients with HF.     

Japanese randomized trial for investigation of a combined therapy of amiodarone and implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation: the Nippon ICD Plus Pharmachologic Option Necessity study design.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are the most effective therapy in reducing the mortality of patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, the ICD cannot prevent the recurrence of tachycarida attacks and that limits the clinical usefulness of them. The Nippon ICD Plus Pharmachologic Option Necessity (NIPPON) trial was designed as the first prospective randomized study to test the hypothesis whether amiodarone could improve the patient's clinical outcome by reducing the amount of ICD therapy in the Japanese patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Approximately 400 patients with organic heart disease and spontaneous episode(s) of sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) will be randomly assigned to one of 2 groups; the amiodarone group and non-amiodarone group. Both groups of patients will be followed at least for 24 months. The end-point committee will adjudicate events in a blinded fashion. The primary end-points of this study are determination of the appropriate therapy from the ICD and alteration of the assigned treatment because of its harmful effects and/or frequent ICD therapies. CONCLUSION: The NIPPON study is expected to confirm our understanding of the prognostic and therapeutic usefulness of adjuvant amiodarone therapy for patients with an ICD and with a history of sustained VT/VF.     

Ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: clinical presentation, risk stratification and results of long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: Not all patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) are at risk for sudden cardiac death. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk stratification in patients with ARVD/C. METHODS AND RESULTS: Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) was performed in 34 ARVD/C patients. Twenty-two, 7 and 4 patients had documented sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (smVT), non-smVT and ventricular fibrillation, respectively. One patient experienced syncope only. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted in 11 patients inducible in smVT with hemodynamic compromise, in 4 patients with documented ventricular fibrillation and in one patient with non-smVT (194 ms tachycardia cycle length) (ICD group, n = 16). Ten patients were left without any antiarrhythmic therapy, 5 patients received antiarrhythmic drugs and 3 patients underwent successful VT ablation (non-ICD group, n = 18). Thirteen patients had an abnormal signal averaged ECG. During 6.5 +/- 2.4 years 69% of ICD patients received appropriate discharges and one non-ICD patient had a hemodynamically tolerated smVT recurrence (no sudden cardiac death in both groups). Comparison between the cycle lengths of clinical VT, induced VT and follow-up VT revealed a strong relationship (R = 0.62-0.88). On multivariate analysis abnormal signal averaged ECG and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction were statistically significant predictors for VT recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In ARVD/C the tachycardia cycle length of clinical VT, PVS-induced VT and follow-up VT correlate well implicating that a PVS-guided approach does not provide additional information. Spontaneous arrhythmia in combination with clinical presentation allows identification of patients in need for an ICD.     

Value of programmed ventricular stimulation in the evaluation and management of patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia associated with coronary artery disease

Programmed ventricular stimulation with up to 3 extrastimuli at the right ventricular apex was performed in 52 patients with spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) associated with coronary artery disease. There were 44 men and 8 women, aged 66 +/- 9 years (range 45 to 86). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 41 +/- 14%. Nonsustained VT was asymptomatic in 10 patients (19%), while the arrhythmia was detected during evaluation of palpitations in 5 patients (10%), presyncope in 11 (21%) and syncope in 26 patients (50%). All patients were tested in the drug-free state and were classified as having no inducible arrhythmia (31 patients, group I), or an inducible arrhythmia (21 patients, group II). The age, gender, type of heart disease, symptoms and left ventricular ejection fraction were similar in both groups. Group I patients had a higher overall incidence of syncope. Group I patients received no therapy, while group II patients received antiarrhythmic therapy guided by electropharmacologic testing. At 21 +/- 17 months there was no sustained VT in either group. There were 3 deaths in group I patients, including 1 sudden, 1 nonsudden cardiac and 1 noncardiac death. In group II patients 6 deaths occurred including 4 nonsudden cardiac and 2 noncardiac deaths. In patients with nonsustained VT and coronary artery disease undergoing programmed ventricular stimulation, the incidence of significant arrhythmic events is low in those without therapy with no inducible arrhythmia, and in those with an inducible arrhythmia with therapy guided by electrophysiologic testing.