Antiepileptics and the treatment of neuropathic pain: evidence from animal models

Neuropathic pain is characterised by both positive (hyperalgesia and allodynia) and negative (sensory deficits) symptoms and remains intractable to many commonly used analgesics. Antiepileptics are increasingly utilised in the treatment of neuropathic pain. This class of drugs works via three major mechanisms of action in order to dampen neuronal hyperexcitability within the central nervous system: potentiation of GABA transmission, reduction of glutamate-mediated excitatory transmission, and block of voltage-activated ion channels. The latter mechanism of action in particular, is exemplified by the success of the newer generation of antiepileptics such as lamotrigine and gabapentin in the clinical treatment of neuropathic pain symptoms. In the current review article, we will examine in detail, the antinociceptive effects of a diverse range of antiepileptics as tested in animal models of nerve injury. Where appropriate, we will compare these findings with their analgesic efficacy in the clinical treatment of neuropathic pain.     

Antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of neuropathic pain

Antiepileptic drugs are an effective treatment for various forms of neuropathic pain of peripheral origin, although they rarely provide complete pain relief. Multiple multicentre randomised controlled trials have shown clear efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Theses drugs can be rapidly titrated and are well tolerated. Topiramate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are alternatives for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy, but should be titrated slowly. Carbamazepine remains the drug of choice for trigeminal neuralgia; however, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine are potential alternatives.There is an apparent need for large-scale randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in neuropathic pain in general, and in cancer-related neuropathic pain and neuropathic pain of central origin in particular. Trials with long-term follow-up are required to establish the long-term efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in neuropathic pain. There is only limited scientific evidence to support the idea that drug combinations are likely to be more efficacious and safer than each drug alone; further studies are warranted in this area.     

Anti-convulsants and anti-depressants

Damage to a nerve should only lead to sensory loss. While this is common, the incidence of spontaneous pain, allodynia and hyperalgesia indicate marked changes in the nervous system that are possible compensations for the loss of normal function that arises from the sensory loss. Neuropathic pain arises from changes in the damaged nerve which then alter function in the spinal cord and the brain and lead to plasticity in areas adjacent to those directly influenced by the neuropathy. The peripheral changes drive central compensations so that the mechanisms involved are multiple and located at a number of sites. Nerve damage increases the excitability of both the damaged and undamaged nerve fibres, neuromas and the cell bodies in the dorsal root ganglion. These peripheral changes are substrates for the ongoing pain and the efficacy of excitability blockers such as carbamazepine, lamotrigine and mexiletine, all anti-convulsants. A better understanding of ion channels at the sites of injury has shown important roles of particular sodium, potassium and calcium channels in the genesis of neuropathic pain. Within the spinal cord, increases in the activity of calcium channels and the receptors for glutamate, especially the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, trigger wind-up and central hyperexcitability. Increases in transmitter release, neuronal excitability and receptive field size result from the damage to the peripheral nerves. Ketamine and gabapentin/pregabalin, again with anti-convulsant activity, may interact with these mechanisms. Ketamine acts on central spinal mechanisms of excitability whereas gabapentin acts on a subunit of calcium channels that is responsible for the release of pain transmitters into the spinal cord. In addition to these spinal mechanisms of hyperexcitability, spinal cells participate in a spinal-supraspinal loop that involves parts of the brain involved in affective responses to pain but also engages descending excitatory and inhibitory systems that use the monoamines. These pathways become more active after nerve injury and are the site of action of anti-depressants. This chapter reviews the evidence and mechanisms of drugs, both anti-depressants and anti-convulsants, that are believed to be effective in pain control, with a major emphasis on the neuropathic state.     

Anticonvulsants for neuropathic pain syndromes: mechanisms of action and place in therapy

Neuropathic pain, a form of chronic pain caused by injury to or disease of the peripheral or central nervous system, is a formidable therapeutic challenge to clinicians because it does not respond well to traditional pain therapies. Our knowledge about the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain has grown significantly over last 2 decades. Basic research with animal and human models of neuropathic pain has shown that a number of pathophysiological and biochemical changes take place in the nervous system as a result of an insult. This property of the nervous system to adapt morphologically and functionally to external stimuli is known as neuroplasticity and plays a crucial role in the onset and maintenance of pain symptoms. Many similarities between the pathophysiological phenomena observed in some epilepsy models and in neuropathic pain models justify the rational for use of anticonvulsant drugs in the symptomatic management of neuropathic pain disorders. Carbamazepine, the first anticonvulsant studied in clinical trials, probably alleviates pain by decreasing conductance in Na+ channels and inhibiting ectopic discharges. Results from clinical trials have been positive in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, painful diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia. The availability of newer anticonvulsants tested in higher quality clinical trials has marked a new era in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Gabapentin has the most clearly demonstrated analgesic effect for the treatment of neuropathic pain, specifically for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia. Based on the positive results of these studies and its favourable adverse effect profile, gabapentin should be considered the first choice of therapy for neuropathic pain. Evidence for the efficacy of phenytoin as an antinociceptive agent is, at best, weak to modest. Lamotrigine has good potential to modulate and control neuropathic pain, as shown in 2 controlled clinical trials, although another randomised trial showed no effect. There is potential for phenobarbital, clonazepam, valproic acid, topiramate, pregabalin and tiagabine to have antihyperalgesic and antinociceptive activities based on result in animal models of neuropathic pain, but the efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of human neuropathic pain has not yet been fully determined in clinical trials. The role of anticonvulsant drugs in the treatment of neuropathic pain is evolving and has been clearly demonstrated with gabapentin and carbamazepine. Further advances in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain syndromes and well-designed clinical trials should further the opportunities to establish the role of anticonvulsants in the treatment of neuropathic pain.     

Antiepileptic drugs in non-epilepsy disorders: relations between mechanisms of action and clinical efficacy

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are used extensively to treat multiple non-epilepsy disorders, both in neurology and psychiatry. This article provides a review of the clinical efficacy of AEDs in non-epilepsy disorders based on recently published preclinical and clinical studies, and attempts to relate this efficacy to the mechanism of action of AEDs and pathophysiological processes associated with the disorders. Some newer indications for AEDs have been established, while others are under investigation. The disorders where AEDs have been demonstrated to be of clinical importance include neurological disorders, such as essential tremor, neuropathic pain and migraine, and psychiatric disorders, including anxiety, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Many of the AEDs have various targets of action in the synapse and have several proposed relevant mechanisms of action in epilepsy and in other disorders. Pathophysiological processes disturb neuronal excitability by modulating ion channels, receptors and intracellular signalling pathways, and these are targets for the pharmacological action of various AEDs. Attention is focused on the glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses. In psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, AEDs such as valproate, carbamazepine and lamotrigine appear to have clear roles based on their effect on intracellular pathways. On the other hand, some AEDs, e.g. topiramate, have efficacy for nonpsychiatric disorders including migraine, possibly by enhancing GABAergic and reducing glutamatergic neurotransmission. AEDs that seem to enhance GABAergic neurotransmission, e.g. tiagabine, valproate, gabapentin and possibly levetiracetam, may have a role in treating neurological disorders such as essential tremor, or anxiety disorders. AEDs with effects on voltage-gated sodium or calcium channels may be advantageous in treating neuropathic pain, e.g. gabapentin, pregabalin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine and valproate. Co-morbid conditions associated with epilepsy, such as mood disorders and migraine, may often respond to treatment with AEDs. Other possible disorders where AEDs may be of clinical importance include cancer, HIV infection, drug and alcohol abuse, and also in neuroprotection. A future challenge is to evaluate the second-generation AEDs in non-epilepsy disorders and to design clinical trials to study their effects in such disorders in paediatric patients. Differentiation between the main mechanisms of action of the AEDs needs more consideration in drug selection for tailored treatment of the various non-epilepsy disorders.     

Influence of carbenoxolone on the anticonvulsant efficacy of conventional antiepileptic drugs against audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice

Carbenoxolone, the succinyl ester of glycyrrhetinic acid, is an inhibitor of 11beta-hydroxy steroid dehydrogenase and gap junctional intercellular communication. It is currently used in clinical treatment of ulcer diseases. Systemic administration of carbenoxolone (1-40 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) was able to produce a dose-dependent decrease in DBA/2 audiogenic seizure severity score. Glycyrrhizin, an analogue of carbenoxolone inactive at the gap-junction level, was unable to affect audiogenic seizures at doses up to 30 mg/kg. In combination with conventional antiepileptic drugs, carbenoxolone, 0.5 mg/kg, i.p., which per se did not significantly affect the occurrence of audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice, potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of carbamazepine, diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproate against sound-induced seizures in DBA/2 mice. This effect was not observed after the combination of glycyrrhizin (10 mg/kg, i.p.) with some conventional antiepileptic drugs. The degree of potentiation induced by carbenoxolone was greater for diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, phenobarbital and valproate, less for lamotrigine, phenytoin and carbamazepine. This increase was associated with a comparable impairment in motor activity; however, the therapeutic index of combined treatment of antiepileptic drugs with carbenoxolone was more favourable than the combination with glycyrrhizin or saline. Since carbenoxolone did not significantly influence the total and free plasma levels of diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, valproate and carbamazepine, pharmacokinetic interactions are not likely. However, the possibility that carbenoxolone can modify the brain clearance of the anticonvulsant drugs studied may not be excluded. In addition, carbenoxolone did not significantly affect the hypothermic effects of the anticonvulsants tested. In conclusion, carbenoxolone showed an additive anticonvulsant effect when administered in combination with some classical anticonvulsants, most notably diazepam, felbamate, gabapentin, phenobarbital, and valproate, implicating a possible therapeutic relevance of such drug combinations.     

Pharmacological management of neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) has a number of severe and disabling consequences, including chronic pain, and around 40% of patients develop persistent neuropathic pain. Pain following SCI has a detrimental impact on the patient's quality of life and is a major specific healthcare problem in its own right. Thus far, there is no cure for the pain and oral pharmaceutical intervention is often inadequate, commonly resulting in a reduction of only 20-30% in pain intensity. Neuropathic pain sensations are characterized by spontaneous persistent pain and a range of abnormally evoked responses, e.g. allodynia (pain evoked by normally non-noxious stimuli) and hyperalgesia (an increased response to noxious stimuli). Neuropathic pain following SCI may be present at or below the level of injury. Oral pharmacological agents used in the treatment of neuropathic pain act either by depressing neuronal activity, by blocking sodium channels or inhibiting calcium channels, by increasing inhibition via GABA agonists, by serotonergic and noradrenergic reuptake inhibition, or by decreasing activation via glutamate receptor inhibition, especially by blocking the NMDA receptor. At present, only ten randomized, double-blind, controlled trials have been performed on oral drug treatment of pain after SCI, the results of most of which were negative. The studies included antidepressants (amitriptyline and trazodone), antiepileptics (gabapentin, pregabalin, lamotrigine and valproate) and mexiletine. Gabapentin, pregabalin and amitriptyline showed a significant reduction in neuropathic pain following SCI. Cannabinoids have been found to relieve other types of central pain, and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors as well as opioids relieve peripheral neuropathic pain and may be used to treat patients with SCI pain.     

Adjunctive agents in the management of chronic pain

Chronic pain syndromes include cancer-related pain, postherpetic neuralgia, painful diabetic neuropathy, and central poststroke pain and are common in the elderly. Adjunctive (or adjuvant) analgesics, defined as drugs that do not contain acetaminophen and those not classified as nonsteroidal antiinflammatory or opioid agents, play a role in the management of chronic pain. The term "adjunctive" (or "adjuvant") is a misnomer as several of these agents may constitute first-line therapy for many chronic pain syndromes. Tricyclic antidepressants have formed the backbone of therapy for chronic neuropathic pain for years. However, the difficulty with using agents of this class, due to their clinically significant adverse-event potential, has led to the evaluation of other agents, most notably, the antiepileptic drugs. The most useful are gabapentin, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine. In selected patients, baclofen, mexiletine, and clonidine may be useful as well. Cancer-related pain may respond substantially to corticosteroids, and pain associated with bone metastases to parenteral bisphosphonates and strontium. Practitioners should consider these alternative agents when treating chronic pain.     

Pharmacological comparison of anticonvulsant drugs in animal models of persistent pain and anxiety

Signs and symptoms of persistent pain are associated with neuronal hyperexcitability within nociceptive pathways. This manifests behaviourally as a decrease in the nociceptive threshold to sensory stimulation, and is closely correlated with altered affective pain processing and increased expression of anxiety-like symptoms. Anticonvulsant drugs can have marked analgesic actions in animals and humans, and some have also been reported to possess anxiolytic-like properties in animals. In the current study, we have compared the antinociceptive actions of diazepam (allosteric GABA(A) receptor modulator), gabapentin (binds to alpha(2)delta Ca(2+) channel subunit), lamotrigine, riluzole and phenytoin (Na(+) channel blockers), levetiracetam (unknown mechanism), sodium valproate (potentiates GABA-mediated inhibition), ethosuximide (T-type Ca(2+) channel blocker) and retigabine (K(v)7 channel opener) in the rat formalin test, with their anxiolytic actions in the rat conditioned emotional response (CER) model of anxiety. Lamotrigine, gabapentin, riluzole, retigabine and ethosuximide attenuated second phase nociceptive responses in the formalin test. Lamotrigine, gabapentin and riluzole also displayed an anxiolytic-like profile in the CER model. Notably, the minimum doses of these drugs required to attenuate anxiety behaviour were similar to, or considerably lower than those needed to reverse pain-like behaviours. Diazepam was anxiolytic but only attenuated pain-like behaviours at sedative doses. The other drugs tested were inactive in both models. Our data suggests: (i) an antiepileptic mechanism of action per se is not necessarily sufficient for a compound to display antinociceptive and/or anxiolytic actions; and (ii) the combined antinociceptive and anxiolytic-like profiles of lamotrigine, gabapentin and riluzole suggests that these compounds likely modulate both sensory and affective dimensions of pain.     

Evaluation of anticonvulsants for possible use in neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain is a kind of pain related with functional abnormality of neurons. Despite large progress in pharmacotherapy, neuropathic pain is still considered an unmet need. Nowadays, there are few drugs registered for this condition, such as pregabalin, gabapentin, duloxetine, carbamazepine, and lidocaine. Among them, pregabalin, gabapentin and carbamazepine are well known antiepileptic drugs. Among the group of new antiepileptic drugs, which are addressed to 1% of human world population suffering from seizures, it turned out that 30% of the seizures resistant to pharmacotherapy has not enough market to justify the costs of drug development. Therefore, it is already a phenomenon that researchers turn their projects toward a larger market, related with possible similar mechanism. Anticonvulsant mechanism of action is in the first place among primary indications for drugs revealing potential analgesic activity. Therefore, many drug candidates for epilepsy, still in preclinical stage, are being evaluated for activity in neuropathic pain. This review is focusing on antiepileptic drugs, which are evaluated for their analgesic activity in major tests related with neuropathic pain. Relation between structure, mechanism of action and result in tests such as the Chung model (spinal nerve ligation SNL), the Bennett model (chronic constriction injury of sciatic nerve CCI) and other tests are considered. The first examples are carbamazepine, gabapentin, and lacosamide as drugs well established in epilepsy market as well as drug candidates such as valnoctamide, and other valproic acid derivatives, novel biphenyl pyrazole derivatives, etc. Moreover, clinical efficacy related with listed animal models has been discussed.     

Effect of topiramate on mechanical allodynia in neuropathic pain model in rats

Topiramate, unlike gabapentin, lamotrigine and tiagabine, resembles phenytoin and carbamazepine since it had been used as an antinociceptive drug in empirical treatment of neuropathic pain in humans, before its systemic and planned research was conducted in animal models of pain. Chronic administration of topiramate, at the dose of 50 mg/kg/day, significantly diminished the mechanical sensitivity and shortened the period of allodynia in the Seltzer mononeuropathy model in rats.     

Synergistic antiallodynic interaction between gabapentin or carbamazepine and either benfotiamine or cyanocobalamin in neuropathic rats

Anticonvulsants, including gabapentin and carbamazepine, have shown activity against several types of neuropathic pain; however, they have limiting side effects that may minimize their use. In this study the possible synergistic interaction between anticonvulsants and benfotiamine or cyanocobalamin on spinal nerve ligation-induced tactile allodynia was assessed. Oral administration of gabapentin (15-300 mg/kg), carbamazepine (10-300 mg/kg), benfotiamine (30-600 mg/kg) or cyanocobalamin (0.3-6.0 mg/kg) significantly reduced tactile allodynia in rats. Maximal antiallodynic effects were reached with gabapentin 300 mg/kg (approximately 70%), carbamazepine 300 mg/kg (approximately 66%), benfotiamine 600 mg/kg (approximately 51%) and cyanocobalamin 6 mg/kg (approximately 59%). At the highest tested doses, gabapentin, but not carbamazepine, benfotiamine or cyanocobalamin, significantly reduced motor coordination. Coadministration of gabapentin or carbamazepine with benfotiamine or cyanocobalamin in a fixed ratio markedly reduced spinal nerve ligation-induced tactile allodynia, showing a synergistic interaction between anticonvulsants and B vitamins. Data indicate that combinations of anticonvulsants with benfotiamine or cyanocobalamin are able to reduce tactile allodynia without affecting motor coordination in rats, and suggest the possible clinical use of these combinations in the treatment of neuropathic pain in humans.     

Comparison of the efficacy of carbamazepine, gabapentin and lamotrigine for neuropathic pain in rats

Background:

Neuropathic pain in cancer patients remain a treatment challenge. Many of the anticancer drugs have to be abandoned because patients develop neuropathic pain. Several antiepileptic drugs like carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, felbamate are effective in neuropathic pain and trigeminal neuralgia. However, their efficacy varies.

Aim:

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of antiepileptic drugs in neuropathic pain induced by anticancer drugs.

Materials and Methods:

Neuropathic pain was induced in rats by injecting 4 doses of paclitaxel. The rats were divided into four groups of six animals each. Group I was treated with oral carbamazepine (cbz) 100 mg/kg, group II received oral gabapentin (gbp) 60 mg/kg, and group III was treated with oral lamotrigine (lam) 40 mg/kg and group IV was the control group. Behavioural testing for thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical hyperalgesia was assessed from 26^th day of paclitaxel administration to next five days by hot plate method and Randall Siletto test, respectively, in all the four groups. One way analysis of variance followed by Scheffe''s post hoc test was used for statistical analysis.

Results:

In thermal hyperalgesia lam treated group was found to be significantly (P < 0.001) superior to cbz and gbp treated group. In mechanical hyperalgesia, lam group showed significant response (P < 0.05) as compared to gbp group. However, the gbp treated group showed a significant (P < 0.01) improvement after three days of treatment.

Conclusions:

In paclitaxel induced neuropathic pain, lamotrigine appears to be a promising drug. The difference in responses shown by different antiepileptics’ depends on the etiology of the underlying mechanisms in neuropathic pain.     

Antidepressant properties of anticonvulsant drugs for bipolar disorder

A growing number of anticonvulsant drugs are receiving attention as possible mood stabilizers. This attention is based mainly on the assumption that the antimanic efficacy of anticonvulsants makes them suitable as mood stabilizers. However, their antidepressant properties have received less scrutiny. In this review, current evidence concerning the acute and prophylactic efficacy of divalproex, carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, and topiramate in bipolar depression is evaluated. Clinical outcome data are considered, together with limitations of existing studies and the concept of unmet clinical needs. Findings in placebo-controlled trials suggest an acute and prophylactic antidepressant effect with lamotrigine monotherapy and more modest antidepressant benefits with other agents administered as monotherapies. Results of published studies are considered with respect to the conceptualization of mood stabilization as arising from antimanic and antidepressant efficacy in bipolar disorder.     

Protective Effect of Gabapentin on N-methyl-D-aspartate–Induced Excitotoxicity in Rat Hippocampal CA1 Neurons

Gabapentin was developed as an anticonvulsant, but has also been used to alleviate hyperalgesia in neuropathic pain. In this study, the protective effect of gabapentin against N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-induced excitotoxicity in rat hippocampal CA1 neurons was investigated. Pre-treatment with gabapentin reduced the degree of neuronal damage induced by NMDA exposure in cultured hippocampal slices. Patch-clamp studies revealed that gabapentin significantly inhibited the NMDA receptor–activated ion current in dissociated hippocampal CA1 neurons, resulting in suppression of glutamate-induced neuronal injury. These results show that gabapentin may exert protective effects against glutamate-induced neuronal injury at least in part by inhibiting the NMDA receptor–activated ion current.     

Current management of pain associated with multiple sclerosis

While pain is a common problem in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), it is not frequently mentioned by patients and a more direct approach is required in order to obtain information about pain from patients. Many patients with MS experience more than one pain syndrome; combinations of dysaesthesia, headaches and/or back or muscle and joint pain are frequent. For each pain syndrome a clear diagnosis and therapeutic concept needs to be established. Pain in MS can be classified into four diagnostically and therapeutically relevant categories: (i) neuropathic pain due to MS (pain directly related to MS); (ii) pain indirectly related to MS; (iii) MS treatment-related pain; and (iv) pain unrelated to MS. Painful paroxysmal symptoms such as trigeminal neuralgia (TN), or painful tonic spasms are treated with antiepileptics as first choice, e.g. carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, gabapentin, pregabalin, etc. Painful 'burning' dysaesthesias, the most frequent chronic pain syndrome, are treated with TCAs such as amitriptyline, or antiepileptics such as gabapentin, pregabalin, lamotrigine, etc. Combinations of drugs with different modes of action can be particularly useful for reducing adverse effects. While escalation therapy may require opioids, there are encouraging results from studies regarding cannabinoids, but their future role in the treatment of MS-related pain has still to be determined. Pain related to spasticity often improves with adequate physiotherapy. Drug treatment includes antispastic agents such as baclofen or tizanidine and in patients with phasic spasticity, gabapentin or levetiracetam are administered. In patients with severe spasticity, botulinum toxin injections or intrathecal baclofen merit consideration. While physiotherapy may ameliorate malposition-induced joint and muscle pain, additional drug treatment with paracetamol (acetaminophen) or NSAIDs may be useful. Moreover, painful pressure lesions should be avoided by using optimally adjusted aids. Treatment-related pain associated with MS can occur with subcutaneous injections of interferon-beta or glatiramer acetate, and may be reduced by optimizing the injection technique and by local cooling. Systemic (particularly 'flu-like') adverse effects of interferons, e.g. myalgias, can be reduced by administering paracetamol, ibuprofen or naproxen. A potential increase in the frequency of pre-existing headaches after starting treatment with interferons may require optimization of headache attack therapy or even prophylactic treatment. Pain unrelated to MS, such as back pain or headache, is common in patients with MS and may deteriorate as a result of the disease. In summary, a careful analysis of each pain syndrome will allow the design of the appropriate treatment plan using various medical and nonmedical options (multimodal therapy), and will thus help to improve the quality of life (QOL) of the patients.     

Potent analgesic effects of anticonvulsants on peripheral thermal nociception in rats

1. Anticonvulsant agents are commonly used to treat neuropathic pain conditions because of their effects on voltage- and ligand-gated channels in central pain pathways. However, their interaction with ion channels in peripheral pain pathways is poorly understood. Therefore, we studied the potential analgesic effects of commonly used anticonvulsant agents in peripheral nociception. 2. We injected anticonvulsants intradermally into peripheral receptive fields of sensory neurons in the hindpaws of adult rats, and studied pain perception using the model of acute thermal nociception. Commonly used anticonvulsants such as voltage-gated Na+ channel blockers, phenytoin and carbamazepine, and voltage-gated Ca2+ channel blockers, gabapentin and ethosuximide, induced dose-dependent analgesia in the injected paw, with ED50 values of 0.30, 0.32 and 8, 410 microg per 100 microl, respectively. 3. Thermal nociceptive responses were not affected in the contralateral, noninjected paws, indicating a lack of systemic effects with doses of anticonvulsants that elicited local analgesia. 4. Hill slope coefficients for the tested anticonvulsants indicate that the dose-response curve was less steep for gabapentin than for phenytoin, carbamazepine and ethosuximide. 5. Our data strongly suggest that cellular targets like voltage-gated Na+ and Ca2+ channels, similar to those that mediate the effects of anticonvulsant agents in the CNS, may exist in the peripheral nerve endings of rat sensory neurons. Thus, peripherally applied anticonvulsants that block voltage-gated Na+ and Ca2+ channels may be useful analgesics.     

Antiepileptic drugs for central post-stroke pain management

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly prescribed for a wide range of disorders other than epilepsy, including both neurological and psychiatric disorders. AEDs play also a role in pharmacological management of neuropathic pain. Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a disabling morbidity occurring in 35% of patients with stroke. The pathophysiology of CPSP is not well known but central disinhibition with increased neuronal excitability has been suggested. AEDs include many different drugs acting on pain through several mechanisms, such as reduction of neuronal hyperexcitability. To our knowledge conclusive evidence has not been published yet. The aim of this review is to delineate efficacy and safety of AEDs in CPSP.     

Acute disruption of bone marrow hematopoiesis by benzo(a)pyrene is selectively reversed by aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated processes

Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder (PEPD) and inherited erythromelalgia (IEM) are inherited pain syndromes arising from different sets of gain-of-function mutations in the sensory neuronal sodium channel isoform Nav1.7. Mutations associated with PEPD, but not IEM, result in destabilized inactivation of Nav1.7 and enhanced resurgent sodium currents. Resurgent currents arise after relief of ultra-fast open-channel block mediated by an endogenous blocking particle and are thought to influence neuronal excitability. As such, enhancement of resurgent currents may constitute a pathological mechanism contributing to sensory neuron hyperexcitability and pain hypersensitivity associated with PEPD. Furthermore, pain associated with PEPD, but not IEM, is alleviated by the sodium channel inhibitor carbamazepine. We speculated that selective attenuation of PEPD-enhanced resurgent currents might contribute to this therapeutic effect. Here we examined whether carbamazepine and two other sodium channel inhibitors, riluzole and anandamide, exhibit differential inhibition of resurgent currents. To gain further insight into the potential mechanism(s) of resurgent currents, we examined whether these inhibitors produced correlative changes in other properties of sodium channel inactivation. Using stably transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells expressing wild-type Nav1.7 and the PEPD mutants T1464I and M1627K, we examined the effects of the three drugs on Navβ4 peptide-mediated resurgent currents. We observed a correlation between resurgent current inhibition and a drug-mediated increase in the rate of inactivation and inhibition of persistent sodium currents. Furthermore, although carbamazepine did not selectively target resurgent currents, anandamide strongly inhibited resurgent currents with minimal effects on the peak transient current amplitude, demonstrating that resurgent currents can be selectively targeted.