Significant role of middle hepatic vein in remnant liver regeneration of right-lobe living donors

For adult patients with end-stage liver disease, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) of right-lobe grafts with or without the middle hepatic vein (MHV) has been increasingly used in recent years. We investigated the role of the MHV in donor remnant liver regeneration after right-lobe LDLT, which has not been described in previous studies. A total of eight living donors were included in this study of right-lobe LDLT. Four donors underwent right lobectomy (without MHV), and the remaining four underwent extended right lobectomy (with MHV). Regeneration of the donor remnant liver was assessed by volumetric computed tomography studies before and 90 days after LDLT. Comparison between the right-lobe and extended right-lobe donors did not show a clear-cut difference in the net increase of remnant liver volume at 3 months. However, the mean volume increase of the medial segment at the 90th postoperative day was 7% in the extended right-lobe donors and 61% in the right-lobe donors, showing a lower value in the remnant livers without MHV. The MHV plays a specific role in remnant liver regeneration of right-lobe living donors. We expect that this knowledge will contribute to securing a margin of safety in right-lobe LDLT.     

Techniques of reconstruction of hepatic veins in living-donor liver transplantation, especially for right hepatic vein and major short hepatic veins of right-lobe graft

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is now widely accepted as a therapeutic option for adult patients with acute and chronic end-stage liver disease. In the early period, the left lobe was the major liver graft used in adult LDLT to ensure donor safety, especially in Eastern countries. However, the frequent extremes of graft-size insufficiency in left-lobe LDLT represented a greater risk of small-for-size graft syndrome in the recipient, which has focused attention on transplantation of the right lobe from a living donor. The major concern of right-lobe LDLT has focused on its safety for the donor and the necessity for including the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the graft to avoid congestion of the right anterior segment. The MHV carries out important venous drainage for the right anterior segment and is essential for perfect graft function. The decision of whether to take the MHV with the liver graft (extended right lobe graft) or whether to retain it in the donor, with reconstruction of the MHV tributaries in the liver graft (modified right lobe graft) has been extensively discussed in numerous studies. However, adequate right hepatic vein and major short hepatic vein (middle and inferior right hepatic vein [RHV]) drainage of the liver graft is perhaps equally important as MHV outflow drainage for the integrity of right-lobe graft function. Herein, the author describes various techniques of venoplasty of the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the major short hepatic veins to obviate venous outflow obstruction in these veins.     

Validity of preoperative volumetric analysis of congestion volume in living donor liver transplantation using three-dimensional computed tomography.

Reconstruction of middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries is controversial in right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of reconstructing MHV tributaries by volumetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Between November 2003 and January 2005, 42 donor livers (right-lobe graft, n = 25; left-lobe graft, n = 17) were evaluated using this software. The total congestion volume (CV) associated with the MHV tributaries and the inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV), and graft volume (GV) were calculated. In recipients with right-lobe grafts, CV/(right liver volume [RLV]) and (GV - CV)/(standard liver volume [SLV]) were compared between 2 groups: with reconstruction (n = 16) and without reconstruction (n = 9). To evaluate the influence of CV on the remnant right lobe in donors, total bilirubin was compared between 2 groups: high CV (CV > 20%, n = 13) or low CV (CV < or = 20%, n = 4). The mean CV/RLV ratio was 32.3 +/- 17.1% (V5, 15.2 +/- 9.9%; V8, 9.2 +/- 4.1%; and IRHV, 8.5 +/- 11.4%) and the maximum ratio was as high as 80.8%. The mean (GV - CV)/SLV ratio before reconstruction in patients with or without reconstruction resulted in 33.5 +/- 12.8% and 55.4 +/- 12.9%, respectively (P < 0.01). In donors, total bilirubin was significantly high in the high CV group on postoperative day 1 compared with the low CV group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, calculation of CV using 3D-CT software proved to be very useful. We concluded that this evaluation should be an integral part of procedure planning, especially for right-lobe LDLT.     

Safety and necessity of including the middle hepatic vein in the right lobe graft in adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of donors who have donated the middle hepatic vein in right lobe live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and to determine whether such inclusion is necessary for optimum graft function. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The necessity to include the middle hepatic vein in a right lobe graft in adult-to-adult LDLT is controversial. Inclusion of the middle hepatic vein in the graft provides uniform hepatic venous drainage but may lead to congestion of segment IV in the donor. METHODS: From 1996 to 2002, 93 right-lobe LDLTs were performed. All right-lobe grafts except 1 contained the middle hepatic vein. In the donor operation, attention was paid to preserve the segment IV hepatic artery and to avoid prolonged rotation of the right lobe. The middle hepatic vein was transected proximal to a major segment IVb hepatic vein whereas possible to preserve the venous drainage in the liver remnant. RESULTS: There was no donor death. Two donors had intraoperative complications (accidental left hepatic vein occlusion and portal vein thrombosis) and were well after immediate rectification. Twenty-four donors (26%) had postoperative complications, mostly minor wound infection. The postoperative international normalized ratio on day 1 was better in the donors with preservation of segment IVb hepatic vein than those without the preservation, but, in all donors, the liver function was largely normal by postoperative day 7. The first recipient had severe graft congestion as the middle hepatic vein was not reconstructed before reperfusion. In 7 other recipients, the middle hepatic vein was found occluded intraoperatively owing to technical errors. The postoperative hepatic and renal function of the recipients with an occluded or absent middle hepatic vein was worse than those with a patent middle hepatic vein. The hospital mortality rate was also higher in those with an occluded middle hepatic vein (3/9 vs. 5/84, P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Inclusion of the middle hepatic vein in right-lobe LDLT is safe and is essential for optimum graft function and patient survival.     

Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation: running suture under surgical loupes by cardiovascular surgeons in 180 recipients

Objectives

The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction by cardiovascular surgeons in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT).

Methods

From April 2007 to April 2011, 187 recipients underwent A-A LDLT. After excluding seven ABO-incompatible transplant recipients, we reviewed the courses of 180 patients including 125 men and 55 women of mean age 52.5 ± 9.2 years (range = 23-71). One hundred seventy-seven patients received right-lobe grafts with inclusion of middle hepatic vein (MHV); two, right-lobe grafts without MHV; and one, left-lobe graft. A continuous, single-stitch, running suture with the parachute technique was used for HA reconstruction. The anastomosis was performed by cardiovascular surgeons employing surgical loupes with 4.5× magnification.

Results

The mean time for an arterial reconstruction was 10.7 ± 4.0 minutes (median = 10, range = 4-30). Hepatic arterial thrombosis (HAT) was encountered in 3 (1.66%) patients. One HAT that developed on postoperative day 1 was successfully rescued by the intra-arterial infusion of urokinase. Another patient required reoperation due to a redundant kinked HA. A third HAT patient underwent successful retransplantation with a cadaveric graft on postoperative day 6. In our series, no delayed HAT was detected and no recipient deaths were related to HAT.

Conclusion

HA reconstruction with a running suture under surgical loupes is a feasible technique in A-A LDLT. A speedy reconstruction can be performed by an experienced cardiovascular surgeon with a low incidence of HAT.     

Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Donor Selection Criteria and Postoperative Outcomes. A Single-Center Experience With a 10-Year Follow-up

Background

Donor safety must be considered to be a priority in live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate these outcomes with special attention to surgical complications and their treatment.

Methods

From March 2001 to March 2012, 80 live donors underwent right hepatectomy (5-8 segments). The middle hepatic vein was always left in the donor. Our retrospective study analyzed surgical outcomes and complications according to the Clavien classification modified for live donors.

Results

With a median follow up of 63.2 ± 12.6 months, the mortality was 0%. Two donors experienced intraoperative complications, but all of them had complete recovery there after. Among the 22 complications in 17 donors (21.2%), 7 (8.7%) were major complications (Clavien grade 2b) but only 2 donors required surgical treatment.

Conclusions

LDLT is a safe and feasible modality to alleviate the cadaveric donor shortage. The efficacy of this procedure is similar to that with deceased donors.     

成人右半肝活体肝移植切取肝中静脉对供者术后早期恢复的影响

目的 探讨带与不带肝中静脉活体右半肝移植对供者的影响.方法 连续观察本中心2007年8月至2008年8月实施的活体肝移植供者62例,其中带肝中静脉右半肝切取的供体30例(A组),不带肝中静脉右半肝切取的供体32例(B组).术前综合考虑移植物大小、残肝比例、有无脂肪肝、肝中静脉类型、受体术前门脉高压情况,确定是否带肝中静脉.术中以缺血线确定肝切平面,以术中B超了解肝中静脉的走向及分支,肝切线在肝中静脉左或右侧紧贴肝中静脉.所有供者均详细记录手术时间、术中失血以及术后住院期间胆红素、INR、谷丙转氨酶、白蛋白变化和各种并发症发生情况.结果 两组供者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间无明显差异.A组术后早期凝血功能(INR)、胆红素及谷丙转氨酶均高于B组,但术后1周时两组比较无明显差异.A组术后白蛋白恢复缓慢,腹水较多.两组供者术后早期并发症发生情况相似,术后切口感染A、B组分别为2例和3例;术后早期胆汁郁积A组3例,B组1例,术后2周逐渐恢复正常.A组、B组均有2例发生断面胆漏,经抗感染、外引流等治疗后均获痊愈.A、B组分别有6例、5例术后4 d至1周出现不同程度的胃排空障碍,经调整饮食、鼓励活动及应用胃动力药物后缓解.结论 切取肝中静脉可能存在供者术后恢复缓慢的问题.但是在术前系统评估,分析肝中静脉类型,特别是注意残余肝比例不得低于30%,注意保留左内叶上段静脉及Ⅳ段动脉,有效保护残存部分肝功能的前提下,带肝中静脉的右半肝切除对供者是安全的.     

Surgery-related morbidity in living donors of right-lobe liver graft: lessons from the first 200 cases

BACKGROUND: Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using the left lateral segment or left-lobe graft has been widely accepted, but currently, right-lobe grafts are more commonly used in many LDLT programs with yet unknown risks for donors. METHODS: We investigated our initial 200 donors of righ-lobe grafts to focus on the incidence and variety of surgery-related morbidity. Changes in liver function tests were also analyzed to clarify the relation with donor age, steatosis of the liver, and residual liver volume (RLV). Complications were surveyed for a median period of 28.7 months. RESULTS: In all the donors, liver enzymes and bilirubin were normalized within 1 month. Enzymes on day 1 were significantly higher in donors with older age, macrovesicular steatosis, and larger RLV. Bilirubin on day 1 was significantly higher in donors with smaller RLV. Biliary enzyme was not normalized in the majority at 1 month after donation. Seventy-five complications occurred in 69 donors. Biliary complications were most common, which consisted of 26 bile leakages (13%) and 3 biliary strictures (1.5%) in 27 donors. No significant dependence of the incidence was observed either for donor age (>or=50 years), body mass index (BMI) (>or=25 kg/m2), estimated RLV (<40%), or medical history. None of the complications led either to mortality or to long-term sequelae. CONCLUSIONS: Complications occurred in a significant proportion of right-lobe donors irrespective of donor age, BMI, estimated RLV, and medical history. Living-liver donor surgery requires more care in right-lobe transplants.     

Impact of Right Lobe with Middle Hepatic Vein Graft in Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

Technical improvements in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) have led to the use of right-lobe grafts to overcome the problems encountered with 'small-for-size grafts'. The major controversy remains that the venous drainage from anterior segment substantially depends on tributaries of the middle hepatic vein (MHV), and deprivation of such tributaries may critically influence the postoperative graft function. Right-lobe grafts with MHV could resolve the potential problem of congestion in anterior segment. From December 2000 to January 2004, we performed 217 right-lobe LDLTs for adult patients. Of these, 40 patients received a right lobe with MHV graft (18.4%). The overall cumulative 3-year graft survival rate of a right lobe with (n = 40) and without MHV (n = 177) was 86.2% and 74.8% (p = NS). The proximal side of the MHV and the drainage vein of segment IV to the MHV (the left medial superior vein) were preserved in 24 patients. All of them needed venous interposition graft for anastomosis. All patients had a patent right hepatic vein (RHV) and MHV anastomosis during the follow-up period. We adopted the right lobe with MHV graft in 40 LDLT cases. Vein graft is essential for safe MHV anastomosis in cases which preserve proximal side of the MHV.     

活体肝移植治疗HBV相关性急性亚急性肝功能衰竭

目的 探讨活体肝移植(living donor liver transplantation,LDLT)HBV感染导致的急性肝功能衰竭(acute liver failure,ALF)和亚急性肝功能衰竭(subacute liver failure,SALF)患者的可行性,并评价其疗效.方法 回顾性分析2000年11月至2007年10月完成的10例LDLT治疗ALF、SALF患者的临床资料.10例LDLT的供、受者均为成人,切取右半肝为移植物,8例含肝中静脉(middle hepatic vein,MHV).10例供者的评估均在确定实施LDLT的24 h内完成,供、受者手术均在确定供者后的12 h内完成.移植物质量与受者体质量比为(1.03±0.17)%(0.86%～1.22%),移植物体积与受者标准肝体积比为(52.2±11.8)%(47.6%～70.1%).结果 10例受者中,2例分别于术后7、28 d时因肺部感染、十二指肠球部溃疡穿孔腹腔感染死亡.1例胆管吻合口胆漏,经十二指肠镜下置入鼻胆管引流治愈.2例术后1周出现轻度急性排斥反应,增强免疫抑制强度后肝功能恢复正常.8例中位随访期9.6个月(2～84个月),生存质量优良.10例供者中,1例出现急性门静脉高压症导致脾脏破裂,行脾脏切除术,其后出现胆管断端胆漏,经鼻胆管引流结合经皮穿刺腹腔引流治愈.其余9例无并发症发生.结论 LDLT适宜治疗HBV感染导致的ALF、SALF,而且能获得较好的中、远期疗效.     

Donor complications among 500 living donor liver transplantations at a single center

Introduction

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become necessary because of the shortage of cadaveric organs. We retrospectively analyzed 500 living donor hepatectomies using the Clavien classification system for complications to grade their severity.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified and applied the Clavien clasification to 500 consecutive donors who underwent right for LDLT left hepatectomy between January 2007 and August 2011.

Results

The 149 complications were observed in 93 of 500 (18.6%) donors who were followed for a mean 30 months. There wan no donor mortality. Complications developed in 85 (18.6%) right 5 (35.7%) left, and 3 (10%) left lateral segment hepatectomy donors. The overall incidence of reoperations was 7.2%. Seventy-seven of 149 complications were grade I (51.6%) or 9 grade II (6%). The major complications consisted of 27 (18.1%) grade IIIa, 35 (23.4%) grade IIIb, and 1 (0.6%) grade IVa. Grade IVb and grade V complications did not occur. The most common problems were biliary complications in 14 of 181 donors (7.7%).

Conclusion

Donors for LDLT experienced a range of complications.     

Clinical Outcomes and Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Living Donors for Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Analysis of 100 Donors

There are few reports about the quality of life (QOL) and morbidities of pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) donors. We evaluated the potential morbidities and identified the predictive factors regarding the QOL of living donors after pediatric LDLT. This cross-sectional study was a single-center analysis of 100 donors for pediatric LDLT. The severity of morbidities was assessed with the Clavien classification, the QOL was investigated with the short form-36 (SF-36), and the decision-making process regarding donation was analyzed with questionnaires. The median follow-up period was 3.8 years (range, 2.2–6.0 years). A total of 13% of the donors developed postoperative complications of Clavien grades I (7%), II (3%), and IIIA (3%). There was no grade IV morbidity or mortality. Eighty-one donors responded to the questionnaire and SF-36. The analysis of the questionnaires revealed that the donors had difficulty in the decision-making process, and suggested that it may be necessary to administer multistep informed consent. We identified unique predictive risk factors for lower SF-36 scores in the donors, which were the time to donation (more than 4 weeks) and the predonation self-oriented perception. The donors who have risk factors require enhanced pre- and post-donation psychological care.     

Safety of donor right hepatectomy without abdominal drainage: a prospective evaluation in 100 consecutive liver donors.

Although the role of routine abdominal drainage after liver resection for tumors has been questioned, abdominal drainage after donor right hepatectomy for live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been a routine practice in most transplant centers. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety of the procedure without abdominal drainage. A prospective study was performed on 100 consecutive liver donors who underwent right hepatectomy for LDLT from July 2000 to September 2003. Biliary anatomy was carefully studied with intraoperative cholangiography using fluoroscopy. The middle hepatic vein was included in the graft in all except 1 patient. Parenchymal transection was performed using an ultrasonic dissector. The right hepatic duct was transected at the hilum and the stump was closed with 6-O polydioxanone continuous suture. Absence of bile leakage was confirmed with methylene blue solution instilled through the cystic duct stump. The abdomen was closed after careful hemostasis without drainage in all donors. The median age of the donors was 36 years (range 18-56 years). Median operative blood loss and operating time were 350 mL (range 42-1,400 mL) and 7.5 hours (range 5.2-10.7 hours), respectively. None of the donors required any blood or blood product transfusion. There was no operative mortality. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 5-30 days). Postoperative morbidity occurred in 19 patients (19%), most of which were minor complications. No donor experienced bile leakage, intraabdominal bleeding, or collection. None required surgical, radiologic, or endoscopic intervention for postoperative complications, except for 1 donor who developed late biliary stricture that required endoscopic dilatation. All donors were well with a median follow-up of 32 months (range 11-50 months). In conclusion, with detailed study of the biliary anatomy and meticulous surgical technique, donor right hepatectomy can be safely performed without abdominal drainage. Abdominal drainage is not a mandatory procedure after donor hepatectomy in LDLT.     

Analysis and Outcomes of Right Lobe Hepatectomy in 101 Consecutive Living Donors

The shortage of deceased organ donors has created a need for right lobe living donor liver transplantation (RLDLT) in adults. Concerns regarding donor safety, however, necessitate continuous assessment of donor acceptance criteria and documentation of donor morbidity. We report the outcomes of our first 101 donors who underwent right lobectomy between April 2000 and November 2004. The cohort comprised 58 men and 43 women with a median age of 37.8 years (range: 18.6-55 years); median follow-up is 24 months. The middle hepatic vein (MHV) was taken with the graft in 55 donors. All complications were recorded prospectively and stratified by grade according to Clavien's classification. Overall morbidity rate was 37%; all complications were either grade 1 or 2, and the majority occurred during the first 30 days after surgery. Removal of the MHV did not affect morbidity rate. There were significantly fewer complications in the later half of our experience. All donors are well and have returned to full activities. With careful donor selection and specialized patient care, low morbidity rates can be achieved after right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation.     

Background and clinical impact of tissue congestion in right-lobe living-donor liver grafts: a magnetic resonance imaging study

BACKGROUND: Although right-lobe liver grafts from living donors have been widely accepted as an option for adult patients, impact of middle hepatic vein (MHV) deprivation is a recent controversy. METHODS: Fifty recipients of right-lobe living-donor liver grafts without MHV or drainage reconstruction in anterior segment were evaluated for posttransplant tissue congestion with T2-weighted magnetic resonance imagings. Age of recipients and donors ranged from 19 to 69 (median 50) and 19 to 64 (46) years, respectively. Graft-to-recipient weight ratio ranged from 0.74% to 1.66% (1.06%). Cavoplasty was provided during right hepatic vein reconstruction to avoid anastomotic stricture. RESULTS: Congestion was observed in 88% of segments V and 85% of segments VIII in the first month. Congestion positively correlated with anatomic dependency on MHV. Also, donors were significantly older in age in grafts with more congestion. However, congestion improved within several months in most grafts. Graft congestion was associated neither with morbidities nor with graft loss except for temporary correlation with ascites production in the third and fourth posttransplant weeks. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of right-lobe liver grafts without MHV experience morphologic congestion of the anterior segment in the early phase after transplantation, which is dependent on venous anatomy and donor age. However, the congestion spontaneously resolves in most cases. These results suggest that reconstruction of drainage vein(s) from the anterior segment is not necessary for all grafts provided good outflow through compensatory routes is secured. Additional reconstruction may be indicated in grafts with marginal size, anatomy, and quality.     

Donor outcome after living liver donation: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVES: To objectively evaluate outcomes after living donor hepatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between November 2002 and August 2006, a total of 44 procedures were performed (35 right, eight left, and one aborted after surgical incision). The Clavien classification was used to record surgical complications as follows: grade I, alterations from the ideal postoperative course not requiring specialized pharmacological or surgical treatment; grade II, complications requiring specialized pharmacological treatment, blood transfusion, or total parental nutrition; grade III-a, complications requiring invasive intervention without general anesthesia; Grade III-b, requires general anesthesia; Grade IV-a, single organ dysfunction; Grade IV-b, multiorgan dysfunction; grade V, death; The suffix "d" indicated disability. In this study, grades I and II complications were considered minor, while grades III and V and any lasting disability, serious complications. RESULTS: Male/female ratio was 34/10; median age was 25 years (range, 18 to 42); median hospital stay was 6 days (range, 4 to 14); and only two donors required intraoperative blood transfusion. After a median follow-up of 529 days (range, 8 to 1354), a total of 28 morbidities were encountered in 17 donors (38.6%), including nine donors (20.4%) who had serious complications. Among the 28 donor morbidities, 18 were grade I complications; three were grade III-a complications; five were grade III-b complications; and two were grade IV-a complications. No death was encountered in our experience. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, donor hepatectomy was not an entirely safe procedure; therefore, extreme care should always be given by the transplant teams to living donors to avoid any distressing morbidity or even, the less likely but more catastrophic, mortality.     

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using extended right lobe grafts.

OBJECTIVE: The authors report their experience with living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using extended right lobe grafts for adult patients under high-urgency situations. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The efficacy of LDLT in the treatment of children has been established. The major limitation of adult-to-adult LDLT is the adequacy of the graft size. A left lobe graft from a relatively small volunteer donor will not meet the metabolic demand of a larger recipient. METHODS: From May 1996 to November 1996, seven LDLTs, using extended right lobe grafts, were performed under high-urgency situations. All recipients were in intensive care units before transplantation with five having acute renal failure, three on mechanical ventilation, and all with hepatic encephalopathy. The median body weight for the donors and recipients was 58 kg (range, 41-84 kg) and 65 kg (range, 53-90 kg), respectively. The body weights of four donors were less than those of the corresponding recipients, and the lowest donor-to-recipient body weight ratio was 0.62:1. The extended right lobe graft was chosen because the left lobe volume was <40% of the ideal liver mass of the recipient. RESULTS: Median blood loss for the donors was 900 mL (range, 700-1600 mL) and hospital stay was 19 days (range, 8-22 days). Homologous blood transfusion was not required. Two donors had complications (one incisional hernia and one bile duct stricture) requiring reoperation after discharge. All were well with normal liver function 5 to 10 months after surgery. The graft weight ranged from 490 g to 1140 g. All grafts showed immediate function with normalization of prothrombin time and recovery of conscious state of the recipients. There was no vascular complication, but six recipients required reoperation. One recipient died of systemic candidiasis 16 days after transplantation and 6 (86%) were alive with the original graft at a median follow-up of 6.5 months (range, 5-10 months). CONCLUSIONS: When performed by a team with experience in hepatectomy and transplantation, LDLT, using an extended right lobe graft, can achieve superior results. The technique extends the success of LDLT from pediatric recipients to adult recipients and opens a new donor pool for adults to receive a timely graft of adequate function.     

Adult-to-adult live-donor liver transplantation: the current status

Adult-to-adult live-donor liver transplantation (ALDLT) has emerged successfully to partially relieve the refractory shortage of deceased donor grafts caused by the increasing demands of patients with endstage liver diseases. Following the first successful live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for a child with biliary atresia in 1989, further extension of the technique, using left-lobe liver grafts for LDLT for large adolescents and adults, has resulted in satisfactory graft and patient survival outcomes. However, small-for-size syndrome may occur in some patients with large body size, and in those with acute-on-chronic liver failure or severe portal hypertension. To overcome the problem of graft-to-body-size mismatch, ALDLT, using a right-lobe liver graft was developed. Although routine inclusion of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the right-lobe liver graft is still controversial, the importance of providing good venous drainage for the right anterior sector to ensure better early graft function has gained wide recognition. Preservation of the MHV in the donor is intuitively considered important in reducing the donor risk. However, there are scarce data supporting the contention that postoperative complication is related to the absence of the MHV in the left-liver remnant. Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction has potential advantages over hepaticojejunostomy, and has become the preferred technique in ALDLT. However, biliary complications, especially biliary strictures on long-term follow-up, occur in about 30% of the recipients. The potential beneficial effect of internal or external biliary drainage in reducing the biliary complication rate after duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in ALDLT also remains controversial. Dual-liver grafts and right-posterior sector grafts have been used in ALDLT, and are reported to result in satisfactory survival outcomes at selected transplant centers. There is no strong evidence supporting the postulate that patients with hepatitis C infection have an inferior survival outcome after ALDLT when compared with recipients of a deceased-donor liver transplant. ALDLT has contributed to satisfactory survival outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It allows early surgery for the patients and eliminates the uncertainty of prolonged waiting for a deceased-donor liver graft, and the risks of dropout related to disease progression. The exact selection criteria of patients with HCC for ALDLT have yet to be defined.     

Donor quality of life after living donor liver transplantation

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for children and adults has gained widespread acceptance due to the severe organ shortage. LDLT provides potential recipients with timely transplantation, but this procedure engenders a potentially significant risk to the donor. This study analyzed medical, functional, and psychological donor outcomes after LDLT. Nineteen donors (mean age 33.9 +/- 12 years), who underwent hepatectomy for LDLT (13 right lobectomy for adult LDLT) from March 1998 to November 2002, were interviewed at a median of 13 months after donation (range, 2 to 58 months). According to the Clavien System classification, major complications occurred in three donors (16%), and minor in four (21%). The mean length of hospital stay was 5.7 +/- 1.6 days. Five patients (27%) needed rehospitalization. Complete recovery was achieved at a mean time of 8.5 +/- 3.5 weeks. All 19 donors were able to return to predonation activities. The donor's relationship to the recipient and to their families was improved after donation in all cases; 12 (63%) cited a positive psychological impact on their lives. About 90% would donate again and 84% would recommend donation to someone contemplating it. In conclusion, all donors are alive and well after donation and were able to return to their predonation occupation. Most of them felt that this experience changed their lives for the better and would donate again. Donor safety and quality of life should remain the priority in all donation processes.     

Safety of donor in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft

BACKGROUND: The growing gap between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and available organs has continued to be the primary issue facing the transplant community. To overcome the waiting list mortality, living donor liver transplantation has become an option, in which the greatest concern is the safety of the donor, especially in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT) using a right lobe liver graft. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety of donors after right lobe liver donation for A-A LDLT performed in our center. METHODS: From January 2002 to March 2006, 26 patients underwent A-A LDLT using right lobe liver grafts in our center. Seven donors were men and 19 were women (range, 19-65 years; median age, 38 years). The right lobe liver grafts were obtained by transecting the liver on the right side of the middle hepatic vein without interrupting the vascular blood flow. The mean follow-up time for these donors was 9 months. RESULTS: These donor residual liver volumes ranged from 30.5% to 60.3%. We did not experience any donor mortality. Two cases (7.69%) experienced major complications: intra-abdominal bleeding and portal vein thrombosis in one each and three (11.54%), minor ones: wound steatosis in two, and transient chyle leak in one. All donors were fully recovered and returned to their previous occupations. CONCLUSIONS: A-A LDLT using a right lobe liver graft has become a standard option. The donation of right lobe liver for A-A LDLT was a relatively safe procedure in our center.