Race,socioeconomic status,and breast carcinoma in the U.S: what have we learned from clinical studies

BACKGROUND: Whether African-American women have biologically more aggressive breast carcinoma compared with white women and whether race acts as a significant independent prognostic factor for survival have not been determined. Alternatively, race merely may be a surrogate for socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: A literature review was performed of clinical trials and retrospective studies in the U.S. that compared survival between white women and black women with breast carcinoma after adjustment for known prognostic factors (patient age, disease stage, lymph node status, and estrogen receptor status) to assess the impact of race and SES. RESULTS: Single institutional and clinical studies suggest that, when black patients are treated appropriately and other prognostic variables are controlled, their survival is similar to the survival of white patients. Twelve retrospective studies and 1 analysis of a clinical trial included SES and race as variables for survival. Only three of those studies revealed race as a significant prognostic factor for survival after adjusting for SES. CONCLUSIONS: SES replaces race as a predictor of worse outcome after women are diagnosed with breast carcinoma in many studies. However, black women present with more advanced disease that appear more aggressive biologically, and they present at a younger age compared with white women. Further research should be conducted concerning the precise elements of SES that account for the incidence of breast carcinoma, age at diagnosis, hormone receptor status, and survival to devise better strategies to improve outcome.     

Racial differences in treatment and survival from early-stage breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: African-American women have a significantly worse prognosis from breast carcinoma compared with white women, even when the stage at diagnosis is equivalent. The purpose of this study was to analyze racial differences in the treatment (use of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy) of women with early-stage breast carcinoma and the resulting effects on survival rates. METHODS: Subjects included 10,073 African-American and 123,127 white women diagnosed with Stage I, IIA, or IIB breast carcinoma in the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program between 1988 and 1998. Comparisons were made by race with treatment, age, hormone receptor status, and stage at the time of diagnosis. Survival analyses were conducted to compare risk of death for African-American and white women while controlling for age, stage, and hormone receptor status. RESULTS: Among women diagnosed with early-stage breast carcinoma who receive breast-conserving surgery, African-American women were significantly less likely to receive follow-up radiation therapy in every 10-year age group except in the older than 85 age group. Whether treatment was equivalent or suboptimal, survival for African-American women with early-stage breast carcinoma was significantly worse. However, when treatment was equivalent, the effects of racial differences on survival were significantly less compared with survival associated with suboptimal treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Significant racial differences exist in the treatment of women with early-stage breast carcinoma. Public health efforts to eliminate suboptimal treatment would reduce, but not eliminate, racial disparity in survival.     

Race and differences in breast cancer survival in a managed care population.

BACKGROUND: African-American women with breast cancer have poorer survival than European-American women. After adjustment for socioeconomic variables, survival differences diminish but do not disappear, possibly because of residual differences in health care access, biology, or behavior. This study compared breast cancer survival in African-American and European-American women with similar health care access. METHODS: We measured survival in women with breast cancer who are served by a large medical group and a metropolitan Detroit health maintenance organization where screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up are based on standard practices and mammography is a covered benefit. We abstracted data on African-American and European-American women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer from January 1986 through April 1996 (n = 886) and followed these women for survival through April 1997 (137 deaths). RESULTS: African-American women were diagnosed at a later stage than were European-American women. Median follow-up was 50 months. Five-year survival was 77% for African-American and 84% for European-American women. The crude hazard ratio for African-American women relative to European-American women was 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-2.2). Adjusting only for stage, the hazard ratio was 1.3 (95% CI = 0.9-1.9). Adjusting only for sociodemographic factors (age, marital status, and income), the hazard ratio was 1.2 (95% CI = 0.8-1.9). After adjusting for age, marital status, income, and stage, the hazard ratio was 1.0 (95% CI = 0.7-1.5). CONCLUSION: Among women with similar medical care access since before their diagnoses, we found ethnic differences in stage of breast cancer at diagnosis. Adjustment for this difference and for income, age, and marital status resulted in a negligible effect of race on survival.     

Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival

BACKGROUND: Survival after breast carcinoma diagnosis is significantly worse among African American women for reasons unknown. The purpose of this study was to update reports on the National Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and to examine the effect of race on breast carcinoma survival. METHODS: Subjects were 135,424 women diagnosed with primary breast carcinoma between 1988-1995. Patient age, tumor stage at the time of diagnosis, hormone receptor status, tumor histology, menopausal status, and survival were compared by race category. RESULTS: African American women diagnosed with breast carcinoma (n = 11,159) had a significantly increased risk of death from breast carcinoma and from all cancers compared with white women (n = 124,265), independent of the effects of other predictor variables. African American women were significantly younger at the time of diagnosis, with approximately 33% of the population age 相似文献   

Reproductive factors and risk of breast carcinoma in a study of white and African-American women

BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the association between reproductive factors and the risk of breast carcinoma among African-American women. The authors assessed whether the number of full-term pregnancies, age at first full-term pregnancy, and total duration of breastfeeding were associated with similar relative risk estimates in white and African-American women in a large multicenter, population-based case-control study of breast carcinoma. METHODS: Case patients were 4567 women (2950 white women and 1617 African-American women) ages 35-64 years with newly diagnosed invasive breast carcinoma between 1994 and 1998. Control patients were 4668 women (3012 white women and 1656 African-American women) who were identified by random-digit dialing and were frequency matched to case patients according to study center, race, and age. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: For white women, the reduction in risk of breast carcinoma per full-term pregnancy was 13% among younger women (ages 35-49 years) and 10% among older women (ages 50-64 years). The corresponding risk reductions for African-American women were 10% and 6%, respectively. Risk decreased significantly with increasing number of full-term pregnancies for both races and both age categories. Duration of lactation was inversely associated with breast carcinoma risk among younger parous white (trend P = 0.0001) and African-American (trend P = 0.01) women. African-American women tended to have more children compared with white women, but parity rates were lower in younger women than in older women in both racial groups. However, breastfeeding was substantially more common in young white women than in young African-American women. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, parity and lactation had similar effects on breast carcinoma risk in white and African-American women. If younger African-American women now are giving birth to fewer children than in the past, without a substantial increase in breastfeeding, breast carcinoma rates may continue to increase at a more rapid rate among these women compared with white women.     

Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found that African-American women are more likely than white women to have late-stage breast cancer at diagnosis and shortened survival. However, there is considerable controversy as to whether these differences in diagnosis and survival are attributable to race or socioeconomic status. Our goal was to disentangle the influence of race and socioeconomic status on breast cancer stage, treatment, and survival. METHODS: We linked data from the Metropolitan Detroit Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)(1) registry to Michigan Medicaid enrollment files and identified 5719 women diagnosed with breast cancer, of whom 593 were insured by Medicaid. We first calculated the unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) associated with race, Medicaid insurance, and poverty for breast cancer stage at diagnosis, breast cancer treatment, and death. We then estimated the ORs of having late-stage breast cancer at diagnosis, breast-conserving surgery, no surgery, and death using logistic regression after controlling for clinical and nonclinical factors. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Before controlling for Medicaid enrollment and poverty, African-American women had a higher likelihood than white women of each unfavorable breast cancer outcome. However, after controlling for covariates, African-American women were not statistically significantly different from white women on most outcomes except for surgical choice. African-American women were more likely than white women to have no surgery (adjusted OR = 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 2.37). Among women who had surgery, African-American women were more likely to have breast-conserving surgery than were white women (adjusted OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.33 to 1.98). CONCLUSIONS: The linkage of Medicaid and SEER data provides more in-depth information on low-income women than has been available in past studies. In our Metropolitan Detroit study population, race was not statistically significantly associated with unfavorable breast cancer outcomes. However, low socioeconomic status was associated with late-stage breast cancer at diagnosis, type of treatment received, and death.     

Breast and cervical carcinoma mortality among women in the Appalachian region of the U.S., 1976-1996

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown high cervical carcinoma mortality and increasing breast carcinoma mortality in the Appalachian region of the U.S. (which includes parts of 12 states and all of West Virginia). In the current study the authors report trends in breast and cervical carcinoma death rates among women in Appalachia for 1976-1996. METHODS: Death rates were calculated from information provided on death certificates and reported to the National Center for Health Statistics for Appalachian women and for women living elsewhere in the U.S. ("other U.S. women"). Trends were examined with joinpoint regression techniques overall and by age and race. Average annual mortality rates were calculated by state for 1992-1996 for each state's Appalachian and non-Appalachian areas. RESULTS: Overall breast carcinoma mortality was lower among Appalachian women than among other U.S. women throughout the study period; however, after rates decreased among both groups in the 1990s, the difference appears to have narrowed. No such decline was observed for women age >/= 70 years. Overall cervical carcinoma mortality was higher among Appalachian women than among other U.S. women but decreased during the study period to rates closer to those for other U.S. women. No significant decrease was observed among women age < 50 years. Overall, for both black and white women, breast carcinoma mortality was lower and cervical carcinoma mortality higher among women in Appalachia compared with their counterparts elsewhere in the U.S. For both breast and cervical carcinoma, the average annual death rates (1992-1996) varied by geographic areas within the Appalachian states, but most differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of mortality trends in breast and cervical carcinoma may provide guidance for prevention and control activities to reduce premature mortality from these diseases.     

Racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation,treatment, and survival among breast cancer patients under age 35

BACKGROUND: The age specific breast cancer incidence rate for African-American women under age 35 is more than twice the rate for white women of similar age, and the mortality rate is more than three times higher. To determine factors that may explain racial/ethnic variation in outcomes among young women diagnosed with breast cancer, the authors examined the clinical presentation, treatment, and survival of African-American, Hispanic, and white women under age 35 years. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data for 1990-1998 and SEER Patterns of Care data for 1990, 1991, and 1995 were used for this analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine factors associated with the receipt of selected breast cancer treatments. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to examine 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: The authors found racial/ethnic variation in clinical presentation, treatment, and survival. Both African-American and Hispanic women presented with higher disease stage and a higher prevalence of adverse prognostic indicators compared to white women. African-American and Hispanic women received cancer-directed surgery and radiation less frequently after undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Racial/ethnic differences in clinical presentation and treatment were associated with poorer overall survival in unadjusted analyses. African-American and Hispanic women also had poorer overall survival after controlling for clinical and demographic characteristics and type of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Future research studies should further examine the factors that influence racial/ethnic differences in incidence, clinical presentation, and treatment differentials among young women diagnosed with breast cancer. A better understanding of these factors will facilitate the development of strategies to help eliminate this health disparity.     

Racial differences in the expression of cell cycle-regulatory proteins in breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: African-American (AA) women are more likely to be diagnosed with an advanced stage of breast carcinoma than are white women. After adjustment for disease stage, many studies indicate that tumors in AA women are more likely than tumors in white women are to exhibit a high level of cell proliferation and features of poor prognosis. The purpose of the current study was to compare tumor characteristics and cell cycle alterations in AA women and white women that might affect the aggressiveness of breast carcinoma. METHODS: The study included 124 AA and 397 white women, ages 20-54 years. These women were enrolled in a case-control study in Atlanta, Georgia, between 1990 and 1992. Breast tumor specimens obtained from these women were centrally reviewed for histologic characteristics and evaluated for expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR), c-ErbB-2, Ki-67, p53, cyclin E, cyclin D1, p27, p16, pRb, and p21 by immunohistochemistry. Logistic regression models were used to assess the age- and stage-adjusted associations of various tumor characteristics with race. RESULTS: The odds of a breast carcinoma diagnosis at a younger age and at a later stage were higher for AA women than for white women. After adjustment for disease stage and age at diagnosis, AA women also were found to have increased odds of having a higher-grade tumor, a higher mitotic index, marked tumor necrosis, ductal histology, loss of ER and PR, overexpression of cyclin E, p16, and p53 and low expression of cyclin D1 at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The observed differences between tumor specimens obtained from AA women and tumor specimens obtained from white women, independent of stage and age at diagnosis, indicated that race may be a determinant, or a surrogate for other determinants, of aggressive breast carcinoma and specific cell cycle defects.     

Factors used to select adjuvant therapy of breast cancer in the United States: an overview of age, race, and socioeconomic status.

Age, race, and socioeconomic status all play a role in decisions regarding breast cancer adjuvant therapy. Increasing age remains the major risk factor for breast cancer, while in very young women breast cancer may have a poorer prognosis, even when adjusted for disease stage and other variables. More than half of all new breast cancers in the United States occur in women older than 65 years. Because of the higher frequency of coexisting (comorbid) serious illness in older women, the benefits of adjuvant therapy get smaller as age increases. Adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen and/or chemotherapy can statistically significantly improve survival in older women, but older women are less likely to receive chemotherapy and are less likely to be offered participation in clinical trials. Efforts are now under way to overcome age bias among health care providers and to develop clinical trials focusing on older patients. Breast cancer mortality is higher in African-Americans than in white Americans. Although the biologic characteristics of breast cancer are worse in African-Americans, major differences in survival are related to socioeconomic factors and access to care. When matched for disease stage and other major clinical and biologic variables, African-American and white patients have similar survival rates. Few data are available on the effects of adjuvant treatment on early breast cancer outcomes in Hispanic Americans and Asian-Americans. Poverty and lack of insurance are surrogates for poor outcomes; major efforts are needed to guarantee all Americans high-quality cancer care.     

Factors influencing mortality among young women with second primary breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Tumor characteristics are strong predictors of survival among women with breast carcinoma, yet the variability in prognosis among women presenting with similar stages suggests other factors may also play an important role. We examine the prognostic significance of etiologic risk factors for breast carcinoma to determine whether factors that influence the development of breast carcinoma also affect the course of the disease among a prospective cohort of young women with bilateral breast carcinoma. METHODS: The 369 U.S. women included in this study were from the Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study who were diagnosed with an invasive first primary breast carcinoma between 1980 and 1982 and a second primary breast carcinoma before 1999. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate factors known and suspected to be associated with breast carcinoma and with survival, based on reporting at the time of the first primary. RESULTS: One hundred sixty women died during the 16-18-year follow-up period. The adjusted 1, 5, 10, and 15-year survival rates following diagnosis of second primary breast carcinoma were 94%, 70%, 55%, and 49%, respectively. Survival rates werepoorest among the youngest women, those diagnosed with a second primary within 5 years of their first, poor African American women, women with either primary diagnosed at a later stage, those with less than 12 years of school, single women, and those with major weight gain between age 18 and adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: This study provided little evidence that important etiologic factors for breast carcinoma predict mortality following diagnosis of a second primary breast carcinoma.     

Racial disparities in treatment and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Black women with breast cancer are known to have poorer survival than white women. Suboptimal treatment may compromise the survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy. We analyzed the association of race and survival with duration of treatment and number of treatment cycles among women receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were women in the Henry Ford Health System tumor registry who were diagnosed with stage I/II breast cancer between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2001, who received adjuvant chemotherapy. We calculated an observed/expected ratio of treatment duration and of completed chemotherapy cycles for each patient. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we analyzed the association of early treatment termination and treatment duration with all-cause mortality, controlling for age, race, stage, hormone receptor status, grade, comorbidity score, and doxorubicin use. RESULTS: Of 472 eligible patients, 28% (31% black, 23% white; P = .03) received fewer cycles of treatment than expected. Black race, receipt of < or = 75% of the expected number of cycles, increasing age, hormone receptor negativity, and a comorbidity score of more than 1 were associated with poorer survival. Among the 344 patients receiving the expected number of cycles, 60% experienced delays. These delays did not reduce survival. CONCLUSION: This study is the first to find that a substantial fraction of women with early-stage breast cancer terminated their chemotherapy prematurely and that early termination was associated with both black race and poorer survival. A better understanding of the determinants of suboptimal treatment may lead to interventions that can reduce racial disparities and improve breast cancer outcomes for all women.     

Racial differences in cervical cancer survival in the Detroit metropolitan area

BACKGROUND: African-American (AA) women have lower survival rates from cervical cancer compared with white women. The objective of this study was to examine the influence of socioeconomic status (SES) and other variables on racial disparities in overall survival among women with invasive cervical cancer. METHODS: One thousand thirty-six women (705 white women and 331 AA women) who were diagnosed with primary invasive cancer of the cervix between 1988 and 1992 were identified through the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System (MDCSS), a registry in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Pathology, treatment, and survival data were obtained through SEER. SES was categorized by using occupation, poverty, and educational status at the census tract level. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare overall survival between AA women and white women adjusting for sociodemographics, clinical presentation, and treatment. RESULTS: AA women were more likely to present at an older age (P<.001), with later stage disease (P<.001), and with squamous histology (P=.01), and they were more likely to reside in a census tract categorized as Working Poor (WP) (P<.001). After multivariate adjustment, race no longer had a significant impact on survival. Women who resided in a WP census tract had a higher risk of death than women from a Professional census tract (P=.05). There was a significant interaction between disease stage and time with the effect of stage on survival attenuated after 6 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, factors that affected access to medical care appeared to have a more important influence than race on the long-term survival of women with invasive cervical cancer.     

Ethnicity related differences in the survival of young breast carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND: African-American women face an increased risk of early-onset breast carcinoma compared to white American women, and breast carcinoma has been reported to be particularly aggressive in premenopausal women. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data were analyzed for 507 African-American and 1378 white patients from Detroit diagnosed with breast carcinoma under the age of 40 between 1990 and 1999. RESULTS: The proportion of in situ disease detected in African-American patients between 1995 and 1999 nearly doubled compared to the 1990-1994 interval (11.3% compared to 6.4%) but was consistently lower than the proportion of in situ disease seen in white patients for the same intervals (15.7% and 16.4% respectively). Evaluation of patients with invasive disease revealed that African-American patients had larger mean tumor size (3.4 cm versus 2.6 cm; P < 0.001), lower rates of localized disease (42.4% versus 52.1%; P < 0.001), higher rates of estrogen receptor negativity (61.9% versus 44.4%; P < 0.001), and higher proportions of medullary tumors (5.8% versus 3.3%; P = 0.021). Cox proportional hazards survival analysis adjusted for age, tumor size, nodal status, hormone receptor status, and histology showed higher mortality rates for African-American patients at all disease stages. Relative risk of death for African-American patients was 1.94 in patients with localized disease (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-3.05), 1.58 for regional disease (95% CI = 1.18-2.11), and 2.32 for distant disease (95% CI = 1.15-4.69). CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that young African-American breast carcinoma patients face an increased mortality risk. Additional studies evaluating risk and treatment response in this subset of patients are warranted.     

Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma, held in June 1990, recommended breast conservation therapy for the majority of women with Stage I or II breast carcinoma. The authors evaluated the national use of breast conservation therapy before and after the conference to determine whether the conference had had an impact on utilization. METHODS: Women with Stage I or II breast carcinoma (n = 109,880), diagnosed during the years 1983-1995, were identified via 9 population-based cancer registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the National Cancer Institute. The likelihood of breast conservation surgery versus mastectomy and, among women who underwent breast conservation surgery, the likelihood of postoperative radiation therapy versus none, were assessed for 3 time periods (January 1983 to April 1985, May 1985 to June 1990, and July 1990 to December 1995). Associations between the use of breast conservation surgery or postoperative radiotherapy according to patient stage, age, race, and region were compared among women diagnosed before and after the NIH Consensus Development Conference. RESULTS: From 1985 (the year that the U.S. randomized controlled trial demonstrating equivalent efficacy between breast conservation therapy and mastectomy was published) through 1989, approximately 35% of women with Stage I and 19% of women with Stage II breast carcinoma underwent breast conservation surgery; these percentages remained constant throughout this period. Beginning in 1990, the year of the NIH Consensus Development Conference, the use of breast conservation surgery increased in each subsequent year; by 1995, 60% of women with Stage I and 39% of women with Stage II breast carcinoma received such treatment. However, regional variation in use was observed (Stage I, range 41.4-71.4% for 1995) and no registry reported breast conservation therapy for the majority of women with Stage II disease (range, 23.8-48.0%). The use of postoperative radiotherapy for women who underwent breast conservation surgery was similar in the periods before and after the conference. CONCLUSIONS: Although breast conservation therapy was performed more frequently following the NIH Consensus Development Conference, variation in use by region of the U.S. suggests the continued presence of barriers to widespread adoption of the recommendations formulated at the conference.     

Cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends among white women and black women in the United States for 1976-2000

BACKGROUND: Although cervical carcinoma incidence and mortality rates have declined in the U.S. greatly since the introduction of the Papanicolaou smear, this decline has not been uniform for all histologic subtypes. Therefore, the authors assessed the differential incidence rates of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) of the cervix by race and disease stage for the past 25 years. METHODS: Data from nine population-based cancer registries participating in the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program were used to compute incidence rates for cervical carcinoma diagnosed during 1976-2000 by histologic subtype (SCC and AC), race (black and white), age, and disease stage (in situ, localized, regional, or distant). RESULTS: In black women and white women, the overall incidence of invasive SCC declined over time, and the majority of tumors that are detected currently are in situ and localized carcinomas in young women. The incidence of in situ SCC increased sharply in the early 1990s. AC in situ (AIS) incidence rates increased, especially among young women. In black women, invasive AC incidence rose linearly with age. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in screening, endocervical sampling, nomenclature, and improvements in treatment likely explain the increased in situ cervical SCC incidence in white women and black women. Increasing AIS incidence over the past 20 years in white women has not yet translated into a decrease in invasive AC incidence. Etiologic factors may explain the rising invasive cervical AC incidence in young white women; rising cervical AC incidence with age in black women may reflect either lack of effective screening or a differential disease etiology.     

Changing trends and disparities in 5-year overall survival of women with invasive breast cancer in the United States, 1975-2015

Relative survival is the ratio of overall survival (OS) over survival of the general population, and widely used in epidemiological studies. But it is artificially higher than OS and thus inferior to OS for cancer prognostication of individual patients. Moreover, trend-changes and disparities in OS of breast cancer are unclear while the relative survival of breast cancer has been reported on a regular basis. Therefore, we estimated trends in age-standardized 5-year OS of invasive breast cancer, using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry program and piecewise-linear regression models. Among 188,052 women with breast cancer diagnosed during 2007-2010 (SEER-18, 155,515 [79.3%] survived by year 5), the 5-year OS significantly differed by age, histology, tumor grade, tumor stage, hormone receptors, race/ethnicity, insurance status, region, rural-urban continuum and selected county-attributes. Among 469,498 women with breast cancer diagnosed during 1975-2010 (SEER-9) in the U.S., we observed an upward trend in the age-standardized 5-year OS (stage- and race/ethnicity-adjusted annual percentage change = 0.97 [95% CI, 0.76-1.18]). The 36-year trends/slopes in age-standardized 5-year OS of breast cancer differed by histology, tumor grade, stage, race/ethnicity, region and socioeconomic attributes of the patient’s residence-county, but not by those of rural-urban continuum. The 3-joinpoint model on the 36-year trend identified significant slope changes in 1983, 1987 and 2000, with the largest slope (2.5%/year) during 1983-1987. In conclusion, we here show trends in the age-standardized 5-year OS among U.S. women with breast cancer changed in diagnosis-years of 1983, 1987 and 2000, and differed by tumor characteristics and race/ethnicity. More efforts are needed to understand the trend changes and to address the OS disparities of breast cancers.     

Impact of breast carcinoma on African-American women: the Detroit experience

BACKGROUND: National and regional population-based data have demonstrated substantially worse outcome in African-American patients with breast carcinoma when compared with white patients, as well as a younger age distribution among African-American patients with breast carcinoma. The extent to which various socioeconomic, environmental, lifestyle, and genetic factors interact to account for this ethnicity-related disparity in survival is poorly understood. Greater than one-half of the inner-city population of Detroit, Michigan is African American, and greater metropolitan Detroit has been one of the contributing registries for the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program since its inception in 1973. The impact of breast carcinoma on African Americans in the Detroit area is therefore well documented and provides significant insight into the history, epidemiology, and biology of this major public health care problem. METHODS: A review of the medical literature published over the past 20 years regarding African-American patients with breast carcinoma was performed. The pertinent findings were summarized in the context of advances made in breast carcinoma screening, treatment, and risk reduction during that period. RESULTS: The large African-American population of Detroit is a major factor contributing to the excessive breast carcinoma mortality rate reported for this city, which is one of the highest in the United States. Improvements in early detection of breast carcinoma by using screening mammography have been apparent in the earlier stage distributions of breast carcinoma observed in both white and African-American patients; however, progress has lagged substantially for the latter group. Detroit SEER registry data also have shown a younger age distribution of African-American patients with breast carcinoma and higher rates of estrogen receptor negative tumors. Finally, preliminary data from health maintenance organizations have suggested improved breast carcinoma outcome for African Americans who possess greater socioeconomic benefits, but disparities in disease stage at presentation persist. CONCLUSIONS: The diverse Detroit community is ideally suited for breast carcinoma screening programs and clinical investigations that seek to address and overcome ethnicity-related survival disparities and barriers to health care. Findings from these studies can be correlated with results from similar projects in other geographic areas.     

Effect of axillary lymphadenectomy on breast carcinoma survival

Summary Purpose. To determine the effect of axillary lymphadenectomy on breast carcinoma survival, and to determine racial and age differences in the extent of axillary lymphadenectomy.Methods. Cases were 257,157 women diagnosed with breast carcinoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program from 1988 through 2000. Variables included number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, ratio of positive nodes to number of nodes removed, use of radiation therapy, surgery (breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy), stage, age, race, and hormone receptor status. Correlation statistics were used to determine associations between survival and lymph nodevariables for all cases and when stratified by stage. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to compare survival by lymph node categories overall and stratified by stage. Cox regression analyses were used to determine factors associated with survival.Results. Older women were significantly less likely to have lymph nodes examined and lymph node involvement compared to younger women, and black women were significantly less likely to have lymph nodes examined, but were significantly more likely to have lymph node involvement compared to white women. Risk of death was significantly reduced for cases who had lymphadenectomy compared to those who did not. For cases diagnosed at stage IIA or higher, risk of death increased significantly with increased number of positive nodes and increased ratio of positive to total nodes removed.Conclusions. Improved survival in node negative cases of breast carcinoma may be due to removal of undetected micrometastases. Women diagnosed at more advanced stages as well as black women may also benefit from more extensive lymphadenectomy.